Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:20:05 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: Joshua Isom <jrisom@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: The future of USENET? Message-ID: <20130327212004.GA1571@tiny.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <51535897.3000901@gmail.com> References: <CAD2Ti2-5GDjpOoue1gCb5ZJryT9b%2B1kEGkaehMkTk0CECxrr3w@mail.gmail.com> <kivkjp$hpg$1@ger.gmane.org> <51535897.3000901@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El día Wednesday, March 27, 2013 a las 03:37:43PM -0500, Joshua Isom escribió: > The last ISP I knew had usenet complained about the bandwidth and > storage required. They had a dedicated satellite instead of using their > backbone, and only cached a couple days. All the porn and warez has the > side affect of wiping out the cost benefit. I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works. matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz | - No system with backdoors like Apple/Android E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | - Never being an iSlave WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments, no HTML/RTF in E-mail phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130327212004.GA1571>