Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 15:46:48 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports upgrade script Message-ID: <20160416154648.642c867c@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708@cloudzeeland.nl> References: <2daca22c-7719-0776-fbe8-3c37021298bf@cloudzeeland.nl> <20160416122425.b603d040.freebsd@edvax.de> <a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708@cloudzeeland.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:23:32 +0200 JosC wrote: > In een bericht van 16-4-2016 12:24: > > Use either portsnap (binary upgrade) or svn (source upgrade) to > > keep your ports collection current. In your specific case, I'd > > probably be a good idea to entirely remove /usr/ports (or rename > > it) and start with a fresh copy, to be obtained by _one_ of the two > > methods. > Thanks for your suggestion - what I don't understand is why > my /user/src folder is emty. > Is that normal using portsnap? > It updates the ports tree, not the base system source.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160416154648.642c867c>