Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:53:33 -0500
From:      Chris Bowman <chris@korcett.com>
To:        Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, "Chris Bowman \(Home\)" <chrishome@austin.rr.com>
Subject:   Re: [6.x patchset] Ipfw nat and libalias modules
Message-ID:  <46E0146D.8060508@korcett.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070906123417.GA95067@tin.it>
References:  <46DF68EE.1010905@austin.rr.com> <20070906123417.GA95067@tin.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050804050202030505010607
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It was indeed the tarball downloaded from 
http://ubi8.imc.pi.cnr.it/~flag/libalias/libalias.tgz  ... Thank you, 
I'll give the 7.x code a try.

Paolo Pisati wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:41:50PM -0500, Chris Bowman (Home) wrote:
>   
>>    I was recently testing the in kernel nat patch, which is an absolutely  
>> wonderful addition in my opinion.  I have however run into one issue, when 
>> for example I do the following :
>>
>> ipfw nat 10 config ip 2.2.2.2
>>     
> [snip]
>
> Where did you get the 6.x patch? Did you find a tarball around or 
> you backported the code from 7.x?
>
> In the first case, that patch is old and buggy, and AFAIK the bug you encountered 
> was due to an uninitialized conditional variable.
>
> bye,
> P.
>
>
>   

-- 

--------------050804050202030505010607--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46E0146D.8060508>