Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:03:50 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: lev@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? Message-ID: <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pSiLNJdf6wFEA8TNOA1npFEEVgxaV3ou0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="WPtlGaJ4pVrUeE4ufWDl39GR8Nr8ux2EL" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: lev@freebsd.org, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Message-ID: <46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: IPFW: more "orthogonal? state operations, push into 11? References: <9229d4f7-8466-57b0-c954-117736102bd7@FreeBSD.org> <5755F0D3.9060909@FreeBSD.org> <5759DB79.10205@FreeBSD.org> <3d09497c-136c-e217-154c-ba00e6879c6f@freebsd.org> <20160616005016.A15883@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <d7bef617-70a4-f761-7d09-9413eb720b11@freebsd.org> <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <64d6bdea-fa32-f16f-2fdd-abd33d54d04e@freebsd.org> --WPtlGaJ4pVrUeE4ufWDl39GR8Nr8ux2EL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02.08.16 09:47, Julian Elischer wrote: > Do we have any movement on these improvements? > even similar functionality by different names is ok. >=20 > 1/ ability to use keep-state without an implicit check-state. <--- most= > important for me. (store-state)? > 2/ ability to keep-state without actually doing it <---- less important= > for me. So, if there are nobody against, I plan to commit this part in a several days. > 3/ multiple state tables? this was discussed and I thought I saw patche= s > but I haven't seen it going in, <-- super luxurious AFAIR, this was a part of "per-interface firewall" patch from eri@ and I think it is mostly outdated now, because in head/ we did very complex changes in ipfw. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --WPtlGaJ4pVrUeE4ufWDl39GR8Nr8ux2EL-- --pSiLNJdf6wFEA8TNOA1npFEEVgxaV3ou0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEsBAEBCAAWBQJXojIHDxxhZUBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZwAKCRABxeoEEMihei60B/9T ABGo4jcYrIZvwEnZCJye+Loa831xxVTQOBfzsjypShw6Hu3EdaurWEiI86FrEl1W 0XSbHkNaDSz8IplDSkpYDpUDCj55FZvYefimyzr38dB05Rlr5X3xQmdoT/yBkagx /7jpNXuv+NLANL/4FFTy0tjgNnMg37Vr+YUcuJ/6DT0y6xBzpQ6cyR29dA7o8H09 P19+MmYI00Y1gZrQJC8nRgxEsCmSwCy6FJ5CujWnGw46qhUA8T4LCECzi46lCGqD gHBmrXrlH6kSb6DAkuIW8FuOdaxa5BbCgtCIHIuy1isTzsoDWXEEs/qeXtmEpGmc Bz0YF203mbKfnJe7JvgY =n5sT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pSiLNJdf6wFEA8TNOA1npFEEVgxaV3ou0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46d5cfde-c4ac-ebd0-3c13-2759037621f3>