Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:43:59 +1000 From: Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-update? Message-ID: <5178602F.9010805@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20130424213110.c277bd304c00ab64bcac2225@sohara.org> References: <kl8vjf$nll$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130424203430.e127c9a56fe88f968eed6ad5@sohara.org> <op.wv19hfhe34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> <20130424213110.c277bd304c00ab64bcac2225@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/25/13 06:31, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:17 -0500 > "Mark Felder" <feld@feld.me> wrote: > >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith >> <steve@sohara.org> wrote: >> >>> You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since there have been no >>> kernel changes since 9.1-RELEASE the kernel version message hasn't >>> changed. >>> This could very reasonably be regarded as bug in the update/version >>> reporting process but I wouldn't hold my breath for a fix, as things >>> stand >>> the version reported only changes when the kernel is updated, or if you >>> recompile it after the update. >> It would be nice if the version of the OS itself was stored in something >> like /etc/freebsd-version so you know what the version of the OS as a > Yes it would. > sysctl kern.version
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5178602F.9010805>