Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 13:08:25 -0400 From: Paul Kraus <paul@kraus-haus.org> To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: FreeBS(s)D Message-ID: <7FAD6DAA-56F9-4F74-9E6B-A5AD310326F0@kraus-haus.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407311021520.34015@wonkity.com> References: <53DA3AF8.2090600@webrz.net> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407310843430.34015@wonkity.com> <C18DD449-3AF8-4F9C-852B-98EBC97C3DDE@kraus-haus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407311021520.34015@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 31, 2014, at 12:33, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > True, but I was talking about the onboard controllers on the SSDs = themselves. There are two common ones out there: Marvell and Sandforce. I had not thought about that. I knew about Sandforce controllers (as a = bunch of SSD manufactures tout that they are using them). > Sandforce controllers show high speeds on compressible data, but seem = to have more problems. I have used Kingston SSDs with Sandforce = controllers in a couple of Windows machines without problems, but not = for myself or for any serious duration with FreeBSD. I have not had any issues with the Kingston (Sandforce) units, and I = have pounded on them in pre-production testing. -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7FAD6DAA-56F9-4F74-9E6B-A5AD310326F0>