Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:35:54 +0000 From: Mark Blackman <mark@exonetric.com> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: posix compliance Message-ID: <92468E79-ED9B-4C05-B891-875FA0B65C0E@exonetric.com> In-Reply-To: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > sorry to be a pain. > > Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? Depending on how you weight the various items of POSIX compliance, a finger-in-the-air guess would be around 90%, but I think only the -hackers list can give you a good answer. It's probably instructive to compare to various other OSes level of compliance as well (for your presentation). - Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?92468E79-ED9B-4C05-B891-875FA0B65C0E>