Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:33:09 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Am I getting too old Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK1uiMPnUfSQQ1DL=MOz-56LBDeeekgvO359eG6VcEuZWA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2Bg%2BBvhVNSwXH%2BYCd5X4y6jjKTZJMSvPvpRj1N=NXessFYXOrg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2Bg%2BBvhVNSwXH%2BYCd5X4y6jjKTZJMSvPvpRj1N=NXessFYXOrg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th > wrote: > Hi, > > in the old times (FreeBSD 8) it took me 5 minutes to partition a disk > for a test machine: create a couple of MS DOS partitions, install the > MBR, create FreeBSD partitions, done. It used to be working easily, > efficiently and reliably. > > Now it had been one day since I tried to reproduce that with FreeBSD > 9, not to avail: I always end up with messaged saying things like > invalid partition, or stuff like that. > > What was the rational behind the decision of breaking something that > used to work fine (that had been working fine for over 10 years) and > replace it with something that is ugly, unfriendly (you have to give > some types to the partitions, but nowhere is it written what type is > allowed or not) and that is not working? > > Oh maybe if I choose to go all by default it will work, but I don't > want the default, I want to be allowed to make my own choices easily. > > Best regards > > Olivier >From a FreeBSD admin since the 2.2.x era, I find GPT much easier to work with. I guess this is a preference thing. -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK1uiMPnUfSQQ1DL=MOz-56LBDeeekgvO359eG6VcEuZWA>