Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:27:01 -0400
From:      Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        Chris Knipe <savage@savage.za.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Mailing List Etiquette was freebsd vs. netbsd
Message-ID:  <CAGBxaXnVZwPCB1Ltx6xhEyi7u0606GXNkvBTUG9FUSPrmvOjew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2B4TWFsawpbAyTx_aro01f_0vi1%2BtQ1sfVBoDvrKD_oONX8UGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20200613154409.GA89618@neutralgood.org> <13115.1592302784@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <20200616071153.00006f4d@seibercom.net> <CA%2B4TWFuWN1BV=FftC1xNCYRgqwX%2BCb=wMg_L9MxFHx17Nzjm5Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200616075548.000066f1@seibercom.net> <20200616140416.bd7b8bf2.freebsd@edvax.de> <CA%2B4TWFtgaMkJWAOuvEpSg2TOo2hrG-P7EHJUigCQwgQw3iXtWQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200616142043.7d599458.freebsd@edvax.de> <CA%2B4TWFvf7w=4djQfWLtXhqmip0Rb72Js6BbOW=F_gUkufXuQFw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaX=AG7gi_2B0srPdJ6hGxaO%2B61APREHOL8WmUKvO8s%2Bt%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> <20200616092901.000002f7@seibercom.net> <CAGBxaXkCLvpuswhLuyuRh=UeDm_Xk8JF87KURysrkPbL4Q0qEw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B4TWFt9grnS0_zhZh8ag9tGC_7xkeSVEK8EHnf=m2m-8tmsRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaXkWps%2BNLJvrUdnhjg2HV32cTXTRXHEjrgb%2BAaaAocFSOA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B4TWFsawpbAyTx_aro01f_0vi1%2BtQ1sfVBoDvrKD_oONX8UGQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:02 AM Chris Knipe <savage@savage.za.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:56 PM Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>> More like it has been fire tested to hell and back and passes with flying
>> colors where newer stuff can't always make that claim.
>>
>
> I bet they said the same about SSL1.0 / SSL2.0, or WPA, or well, take your
> pick... :-)
>
> Even medical technologies, envolve at a rapid, rapid pace...  The MAX had
> nothing to do with 80x25 text, neither does a heart monitor.
>

It doesn't evolve as fast you *THINK* it does for example our system
supports over 200 different doctor offices/practices and about 10% still
use Windows XP at 1024x768 and *REFUSE* to move to anything newer even
after being told that using anything older than Windows 8  is an automatic
HIPAA violation (DHS OCR [the office that oversees HIPAA enforcement] has
said anything that lacks active vendor support is an automatic
violation).   About another 20% use Windows 7 and also refuse to upgrade.
The console for the monitors (rarely used directly by anyone except for us
the programmers) is 24x80 via a USB connector.   So yes such screen sizes
are an issue for us.

-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaXnVZwPCB1Ltx6xhEyi7u0606GXNkvBTUG9FUSPrmvOjew>