Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 01:04:36 -0700 From: Frank Fenderbender <frankfenderbender@council124.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD desktop "best-fit" Dell platform suggestions? (sp. DC reply) Message-ID: <F89E6058-8BD2-499C-AA45-F1FE6E76939E@council124.org> In-Reply-To: <06447bee-f1d3-6967-f2af-73c68df05351@holgerdanske.com> References: <CANx7MpfDQJEUsjo_SSYqnExagj30NAAD8cPYiR3mDZq_ztor8Q@mail.gmail.com> <43760917-5FAA-4C75-A4D2-923A5EA0E624@council124.org> <2d7ff5f5-603f-004d-31fc-14eef658997e@holgerdanske.com> <06447bee-f1d3-6967-f2af-73c68df05351@holgerdanske.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks much, David C! This type of research, unpacked from personal experience for a general = perusal, salvages from the private pains & pangs, as well as the joyous = successes, encountered while fitting releases to systems, and = vice-[re]versa. As payback for the efforts made towards pulling me towards the success = side, I will see if i can create a spreadsheet, which I'll put up on my = <http://lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-Life/Computing/Computing.htm>; web = page. Its goal will roughly be to list issues based on release:hardware. = I' also like to work on a page that helps with add-on dependencies so = that collisions can be avoided and troubleshooting made a bit easier. = Any help on either page is greatly appreciated and open to different = approaches entirely. For now, I'll plan to post the additional page title(s) and url(s) = soon... and how to send in verifiable additions to elevate its coverage = (perhaps with links back to contributors for spec-test-verification = details). I'm open to how best to approach each mini-project.... best wishes, frank re: On 02-April-2019, at 02:24 PM, David Christensen wrote:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F89E6058-8BD2-499C-AA45-F1FE6E76939E>