Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:49:24 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gr=FCnewald_Micha=EBl?= <michaelgrunewald@yahoo.fr> Cc: freebsd general questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Cooking LLVM in FreeBSD 8 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171347550.57834@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CF72636E-0A45-4970-BAF0-FDD53C8456B7@yahoo.fr> References: <CF72636E-0A45-4970-BAF0-FDD53C8456B7@yahoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1626729238-1278541689-1237294164=:57834 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT > On Ivoras'FreeBSD page, ``What's cooking for FreeBSD 8'' > > http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html LLVM site shows it's something like precompiler+runtime compiling. will it be used that way, or as usual compiler? the first way sound really good (single binary for every arch, and optimized at runtime) but i think it will need HUGE change in system. second would be just a replacement > > one can read about the possible substitution of GCC by LLVM (among other > candidates). Under the assumption that LLVM is selected, would this mean that > FreeBSD will somehow integrate the OCaml compiler? > > Of course OCaml is already in the ports, but if it is somehow integrated in > the base system, there is serious opportunities to write system tools with > this language. > -- > Cheers, > Michaël > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --1626729238-1278541689-1237294164=:57834--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171347550.57834>