Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:30:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org> Cc: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best file system for a busy webserver Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208170629350.31628@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org> References: <47AFB706686083E99B3A3F3E@localhost> <20120816180257.6f5d58e5.steve@sohara.org> <175D3B4E21331C5682EE2148@localhost> <20120816214230.0f4fb446.steve@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> OK I would say there's no pressing reason to consider ZFS for this another ZFS fanatics. it is about performance. > direction for a filesystem, at 15GB if performance ever becomes a problem a > RAID1 of SSDs with UFS would make it fly probably into the hundreds of hits > per second range. classic for ZFS and "modern things" fanatics. lots of talk about high end hardware nothing about a thread.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208170629350.31628>