Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2014/freebsd-net/20140831.freebsd-net

Messages: 76, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:53 UTC 2023

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Aug 26 Raimundo Santos            9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer
  2. Aug 26 Raimundo Santos             Re: 9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer
  3. Aug 26 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Coc  Re: 9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer
  4. Aug 27 Raimundo Santos             Re: 9.3 RELEASE not forwarding pkt-gen (netmap) packets over XenServer
  5. Aug 24 =?UTF-8?Q?Support?=        =?UTF-8?Q?Account_Blocked?=
  6. Aug 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 181741] [kernel] [patch] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with
  7. Aug 26 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services
  8. Aug 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services
  9. Aug 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services
 10. Aug 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services
 11. Aug 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services
 12. Aug 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 191975] [ng_iface] [regression] in 10.0: cannot contact local services
 13. Aug 26 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 192426] [bpf] [panic] [patch]: Kernel panic when using BPF
 14. Aug 26 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 193053] ixgbe(4) IXGBE_LEGACY_TX + ALTQ path broken
 15. Aug 25 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bugzilla] Commit Needs MFC
 16. Aug 26 John Baldwin               Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendm
 17. Aug 26 Alan Somers                 Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendm
 18. Aug 26 John Baldwin                Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendm
 19. Aug 26 Mark Johnston               Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendm
 20. Aug 26 Alan Somers                 Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendm


21. Aug 26 Adrian Chadd Re: [PATCH] Packet loss when 'control' messages are present with large data (sendm 22. Aug 26 Sean Bruno [RFC] PLPMTU Blackhole Detection 23. Aug 24 Lev Serebryakov Does anybody have set of scripts to support two uplink connections (with two ISPs) 24. Aug 24 Jim Thompson RE: Does anybody have set of scripts to support two uplink connections (with two I 25. Aug 24 Julian Elischer Re: Does anybody have set of scripts to support two uplink connections (with two I 26. Aug 27 David help porting netmap to new driver 27. Aug 27 Luigi Rizzo Re: help porting netmap to new driver 28. Aug 27 David how join the mail list? 29. Aug 27 Jason Hellenthal Re: how join the mail list? 30. Aug 28 Eggert, Lars igb "requests for mbufs denied" 31. Aug 28 Mike Tancsa Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 32. Aug 28 Alexander V. Chernikov Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 33. Aug 28 Eggert, Lars Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 34. Aug 28 Eggert, Lars Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 35. Aug 28 Eggert, Lars Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 36. Aug 28 Eggert, Lars Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 37. Aug 28 Mike Tancsa Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 38. Aug 28 hiren panchasara Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 39. Aug 28 Steven Hartland Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 40. Aug 29 Eggert, Lars Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied"
41. Aug 29 John-Mark Gurney Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 42. Aug 30 Adrian Chadd Re: igb "requests for mbufs denied" 43. Aug 26 Nick Rogers ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included) 44. Aug 26 Adrian Chadd Re: ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included) 45. Aug 26 Nick Rogers Re: ixgbe IXGBE_LEGACY_TX breaks build (patch/fix included) 46. Aug 26 SoundCloud New message from SoundCloud PR 47. Aug 25 David Somayajulu OFED support on FreeBSD 48. Aug 25 Navdeep Parhar Re: OFED support on FreeBSD 49. Aug 26 Eggert, Lars Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 50. Aug 26 Tom Jones Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 51. Aug 26 Adrian Chadd Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 52. Aug 27 Eggert, Lars Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 53. Aug 27 Adrian Chadd Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 54. Aug 27 Eggert, Lars Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 55. Aug 27 Adrian Chadd Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 56. Aug 27 Eggert, Lars Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 57. Aug 28 George Neville-Neil Re: Patches for RFC6937 and draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-00 58. Aug 24 jmoore Re: Re: Set arbitrary protocol for route? 59. Aug 24 Adrian Chadd Re: Re: Set arbitrary protocol for route? 60. Aug 27 freebsd@jonathanprice.org Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pre
61. Aug 30 Chris H Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pre 62. Aug 26 freebsd@jonathanprice.org Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_prefer" 63. Aug 27 Kevin Oberman Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 64. Aug 27 Peter Wemm Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 65. Aug 27 Jonathan Price Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 66. Aug 27 Kevin Oberman Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 67. Aug 27 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 68. Aug 27 Kevin Oberman Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 69. Aug 27 Jonathan Price Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 70. Aug 27 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 71. Aug 29 John Hay Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 72. Aug 29 Hiroki Sato Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 73. Aug 29 Peter Wemm Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 74. Aug 29 John Hay Re: Should I be using ipv6_activate_all_interfaces or ip6addrctl_policy="ipv6_pref 75. Aug 29 Notification Team We need your help resolving an issue with your account 76. Aug 29 Notification Team We need your help resolving an issue with your account !


home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date