From owner-freebsd-hubs Mon May 5 09:22:14 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA03985 for hubs-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 09:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA03978 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 09:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id SAA10031 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 18:23:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id SAA14774 for freebsd-hubs@freefall.cdrom.com; Mon, 5 May 1997 18:39:49 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 18:39:49 +0200 (MET DST) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199705051639.SAA14774@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hubs@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: incoming --- files Sender: owner-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk There are a bunch of rwxrwx--- files in ftp.freebsd.org/pub/incoming lately. Is this the result of some 'accident' ? Also, the present structure of /pub/FreeBSD could deserve some cleanup, I think. Especially the artful link of ../../.3/FreeBSD/ 3.0-970502-SNAP is a major challenge for us mirrorers ;-) -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de From owner-freebsd-hubs Tue May 6 10:34:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA23156 for hubs-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (root@mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA23152 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 10:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ole.cs.tu-berlin.de (wosch@ole.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.28.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA04888 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 19:33:55 +0200 (MET DST) From: Wolfram Schneider Received: (from wosch@localhost) by ole.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA29546; Tue, 6 May 1997 19:33:55 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 19:33:55 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199705061733.TAA29546@ole.cs.tu-berlin.de> To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: /.3/FreeBSD/3.0-970502-SNAP MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-hubs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I thought ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/.3/FreeBSD/ is only for old releases? And symlinks like lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp-Free 37 May 3 13:00 packages -> ../../../pub/FreeBSD/packages-current lrwxr-xr-x 1 root ftp-Free 26 May 3 13:00 tools -> ../../../pub/FreeBSD/tools will be ignored by most (all?) mirrors. Wolfram From owner-freebsd-hubs Tue May 6 17:25:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA15921 for hubs-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 17:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA15916 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 17:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA05786; Tue, 6 May 1997 17:25:13 -0700 (PDT) To: Wolfram Schneider cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /.3/FreeBSD/3.0-970502-SNAP In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 06 May 1997 19:33:55 +0200." <199705061733.TAA29546@ole.cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 17:25:13 -0700 Message-ID: <5784.862964713@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I thought ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/.3/FreeBSD/ > is only for old releases? Not at all - it's where we've been putting the overflow now that FreeBSD is > 4GB. Better get used to it, because such distribution (and aggregation purely by symlink) is only going to increase as the bit count rises. Jordan From owner-freebsd-hubs Thu May 8 23:49:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA15656 for hubs-outgoing; Thu, 8 May 1997 23:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA15651 for ; Thu, 8 May 1997 23:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA16889 for ; Thu, 8 May 1997 23:49:10 -0700 (PDT) To: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Ack, resend.. Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 23:49:10 -0700 Message-ID: <16886.863160550@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hubs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk To: hub@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Please remove all 3.0-SNAP releases from mirror sites... Date: Thu, 08 May 1997 23:48:36 -0700 Message-ID: <16871.863160516@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" After thinking long and hard about this for the last 8 weeks (and the currently broken snapshot was simply the last in a long series of annoyances with -current release building), I've concluded that 3.0 is simply not ready yet, even to be SNAPshoted, and I am discontinuing SNAPs for now. SNAPshots are reasonable test vehicles only when the pain/benefit ratio for making them is reasonable, and that definitely has not been the case for quite some time. Even when you can somehow manage to build one, and that's generally true only for perhaps one day in ten right now, what you wind up with is usually so broken as to be unusable (as were the last two attempts). And so, to avoid confusion, please delete any 3.0 snaps from your sites. I will no longer support them nor will Walnut Creek CDROM be releasing any on CD. Should a "SNAP server" appear at some point then it'll be a somewhat different ballgame since that's a fully automated, totally non-supported release mechanism and if it falls over or cranks out crap for a few weeks, well, you should have read the warning labels on it first before using it. :) Jordan From owner-freebsd-hubs Fri May 9 06:18:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA00614 for hubs-outgoing; Fri, 9 May 1997 06:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.116.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA00607 for ; Fri, 9 May 1997 06:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de (gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de [137.226.31.2]) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE (RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) with ESMTP id PAA16956 for ; Fri, 9 May 1997 15:19:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from kuku@localhost) by gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id PAA01480 for freebsd-hubs@freefall.cdrom.com; Fri, 9 May 1997 15:18:32 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 9 May 1997 15:18:32 +0200 (MEST) From: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <199705091318.PAA01480@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de> To: freebsd-hubs@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: invalid hostname Sender: owner-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In my 'last' logs a host shows up like: ftp ftp invalid hostname Fri May 9 10:46 - 10:46 (00:00) ftp ftp invalid hostname Fri May 9 10:45 - 10:46 (00:00) ftp ftp invalid hostname Thu May 8 15:43 - 15:43 (00:00) I believe I saw that on freefall (hub) too. Is this a utmp thing requiring to rebuild wuftpd? Interestingly I cannot find entries at the said times in my xferlog. -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku@gil.physik.rwth-aachen.de