From owner-freebsd-security  Sun Jun  6  6:11:46 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923FB15249
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun,  6 Jun 1999 06:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA27310;
	Sun, 6 Jun 1999 15:11:27 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Nicholas Brawn <ncb@zip.com.au>
Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, Mike Nowlin <mike@argos.org>,
	freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NIS strangeness
References: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9906061631420.5855-100000@zipper.zip.com.au>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 06 Jun 1999 15:11:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: Nicholas Brawn's message of "Sun, 6 Jun 1999 16:32:17 +1000 (EST)"
Message-ID: <xzp1zfpbhj5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Nicholas Brawn <ncb@zip.com.au> writes:
> Correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't that a security hazard?

Only insofar as one may consider NIS a security hazard.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message