From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 20:02:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F57106566B for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:02:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689958FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12447 invoked by uid 399); 14 Sep 2009 20:02:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 14 Sep 2009 20:02:39 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4AAEA154.3080805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:02:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laurent Frigault References: <4A9314B7.90405@FreeBSD.org> <20090911134307.GA96627@troll.free.org> In-Reply-To: <20090911134307.GA96627@troll.free.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request: Please hook up IPv6 to cvsup mirrors X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:02:44 -0000 Laurent Frigault wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 03:31:19PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Now here comes the request. My understanding is that there is a fairly >> simple netcat trick to link the cvsup port on the IPv6 address to that >> of the IPv4 address. If that actually is possible, I'd like to request >> that y'all actually do that. :) > > cvsup1.fr.freebsd.org (aka cvsup.free.org) handling both IPv6 and IPv4 > - IPv6 with netcat trick. Thanks, I've made a note of that for future reference. :) I am trying to avoid sending my packets all the way across the Atlantic and back, although I have an excellent route between California and that server. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection