From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Apr 20 07:25:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA23776
          for stable-outgoing; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 07:25:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fmv.mitsumine.co.jp (ns1.ris.co.jp [202.233.13.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA23770
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 07:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from kino@localhost) by fmv.mitsumine.co.jp (8.8.3/8.6.12) id XAA00204; Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:25:12 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:25:12 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199704201425.XAA00204@fmv.mitsumine.co.jp>
From: Masaya Kinoshita <mkino@po.iijnet.or.jp>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Is there a perceived need for a 2.1.8 release?
In-Reply-To: Jordan K. Hubbard's message of Fri, 18 Apr 1997 09:56:15 -0700
References: <17971.861382575@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello !

I can't speak ( and write ) English. Sorry!

I like 2.1-stable branch.

It thinks that I want 2.1.8 as one complete type of FreeBSD.

It thinks that it surely becomes the base of my work for any year from  
now. Therefore, it is Freeze on the media, the CD-ROM, if made It thinks
that it wants to place at hand in the done form.

I therefore already It ordered 2.1.x(Subscription).

We were discourteously.

                        Masaya Kinoshita (PXI14346@niftyserve.or.jp    )
                                         (mkino@po.iijnet.or.jp        )