From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 12 6:27:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1278037BE00 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 06:27:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by david.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07735 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:27:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA17905 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:27:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA69246 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:27:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:27:20 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: "Sean O'Connell" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Acrobat405 and linux_base Message-ID: <20000312152720.A38363@internal> References: <20000310125243.H5009@stat.Duke.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000310125243.H5009@stat.Duke.EDU>; from sean@stat.Duke.EDU on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 12:52:43PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 10-Mar-2000 at 12:52:43 -0500, Sean O'Connell wrote: > >Andre Albsmeier wrote: > >> > >> Stable-3.4 and linux_base from the ports with Acrobat405: > >> > >> andre@bali:~>/usr/local/Acrobat405/bin/acroread > >> zsh: 39367 floating point exception (core dumped) /usr/local/Acrobat405/bin/acroread > >> > >> Any hints on that? Acrobat400 works good... > > > >It's easy to say that it's a bug in acrobat405, but that may not be the > >case. Does acrobat405 work on Linux? > > > >-- > >Marcel Moolenaar > > mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org > > tel: (408) 447-4222 > > This look suspiciouly like the problems that I have with > linux_base-6.1 under both -current and -stable using > > realplayer :( Hmm, version 6.0.4.433 beta seems to work here apart from a LINUX: 'ioctl' fd=7, typ=0x44d(M), num=0x76 not implemented However, I use rvplayer 5.0.0.45 since video is much smoother. > Splus ** makes me have to use linux_base-5.2 > > to name a few. Fortunately, StarOffice, Mathematica and > Matlab don't seem to care. Splus is a real show stopper > for me. > > However of course, linux netscape dies with a Sig 10 under > linux_base-5.2. > > [70]<12:50pm>sto@feta:/tmp> Splus > Signal: floating point exception > Illegal instruction(core dumped) > Exit 132 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 12 6:40:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de [194.138.37.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB0437BCE3 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 06:40:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07917 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:40:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA04163 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:40:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA69322 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:40:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:40:20 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: "Sean O'Connell" Cc: Andrew Gallatin , FreeBSD emulation , cracauer@freebsd.org, marcel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_base 6.1 may work now Message-ID: <20000312154020.A486@internal> References: <14538.64168.213977.432746@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20000311235754.A5556@stat.Duke.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000311235754.A5556@stat.Duke.EDU>; from sean@stat.Duke.EDU on Sat, Mar 11, 2000 at 11:57:55PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 11-Mar-2000 at 23:57:55 -0500, Sean O'Connell wrote: > Andrew Gallatin stated: > > > > Sean, > > > > There was a commit yesterday which may have fixed the linux problem. > > I don't have an x86 handy to play with -- can you see if it makes > > splus et al run with linux_base 6.1? > > > > Drew > > > > > > [9074/9167] Martin Cracauer cvs commit: src/sys/i386/inclu 14 lines -- (all) > > Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:56:33 -0800 (PST) > > From: Martin Cracauer > > To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org > > Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include npx.h > > Precedence: bulk > > X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > > cracauer 2000/03/10 09:56:33 PST > > > > Modified files: > > sys/i386/include npx.h > > Log: > > Change the default FPU control word so that exceptions for new > > processes are now masked until set by fpsetmask(3). > > > > Submitted by: bde > > Approved by: jkh, bde > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.18 +5 -35 src/sys/i386/include/npx.h > > Drew- > > This did it! I can run Splus! Confirmed for -STABLE with acroread 4.05! Might someone commit this to -STABLE as well, please? Thanks, -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 12 8:51:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B5337BB15 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 08:51:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.3/frmug-2.5/nospam) with UUCP id RAA04715 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 17:51:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 2DEF98864; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 17:00:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 17:00:37 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Weird errors from linux (compat) rpm] Message-ID: <20000312170037.A16619@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <38C95344.AADE2983@simplenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <38C95344.AADE2983@simplenet.com>; from DougB@simplenet.com on Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 11:55:48AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF AMD-K6/200 & 2x PPro/200 SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Doug Barton: > Now I've got some real work to do, namely getting the linux version of the > legato backup client running on freebsd. I upgraded the ports on my Get the native FreeBSD version from Legato's ftp site instead. It was packaged by Matthew Jacob and works fine. It is in Unsupported/. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #78: Sun Feb 27 15:32:39 CET 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 12 18:19: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C6E37B645 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:18:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from [128.130.111.2] (deneb [128.130.111.2]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA20494; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 03:18:50 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 03:18:50 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: David Elliott Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, wine-devel@winehq.com Subject: Re: I'm afraid you broke Wine on FreeBSD 3.3 In-Reply-To: <38C962B1.909C6490@netnitco.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, David Elliott wrote: > Sorry about that. It is due to the header files having an ifdef linux > around them. Seriously, code like #ifdef linux /* Copy of info from 2.2.x kernel */ #define SG_MAX_SENSE 16 /* too little, unlikely to change in 2.2.x */ really seems quite bad to me! One should never just copy code from system headers and I really think Alexandre never should have approved something like that. As a matter of fact I have been disappointed several times lately when Alexandre applied patches that broke Wine on non-Linux platforms due to typos or "there's nothing apart from Linux" coding. :-( What's the purpose of an extremely strict development model if even the simplest such issues are not caught during patch review? Anyway, the patch below brings Wine back into buildworld on FreeBSD 3.4. Gerald Index: aspi.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winaspi/aspi.c,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -c -3 -p -r1.1 aspi.c *** aspi.c 2000/03/08 19:41:49 1.1 --- aspi.c 2000/03/13 02:14:11 *************** SCSI_OpenDevice( int h, int c, int t, in *** 144,149 **** --- 144,150 ---- return fd; } + #ifdef linux int SCSI_LinuxSetTimeout( int fd, int timeout ) { *************** SCSI_GetProcinfo() *** 344,347 **** RegCloseKey(hkeyScsi); return; } ! --- 345,348 ---- RegCloseKey(hkeyScsi); return; } ! #endif Index: winescsi.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/winaspi/winescsi.h,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -c -3 -p -r1.1 winescsi.h *** winescsi.h 2000/03/08 19:41:49 1.1 --- winescsi.h 2000/03/13 02:14:11 *************** SCSI_OpenDevice( int h, int c, int t, in *** 47,57 **** --- 47,59 ---- int SCSI_LinuxSetTimeout( int fd, int timeout ); + #ifdef linux BOOL SCSI_LinuxDeviceIo( int fd, struct sg_header * lpvInBuffer, DWORD cbInBuffer, struct sg_header * lpvOutBuffer, DWORD cbOutBuffer, LPDWORD lpcbBytesReturned ); + #endif BOOL SCSI_GetDeviceName(int h, int c, int t, int d, LPSTR devstr, LPDWORD lpcbData); To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 12 18:55: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from c543746-a.valpo1.in.home.com (c543746-a.valpo1.in.home.com [24.17.32.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A5837B789 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:55:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dfe@netnitco.net) Received: from netnitco.net (IDENT:dfe@c543746-a [24.17.32.20]) by c543746-a.valpo1.in.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA26925; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 20:50:44 -0600 Message-ID: <38CC5784.111DC5AF@netnitco.net> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 20:50:44 -0600 From: David Elliott X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.15-2.5.0 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, wine-devel@winehq.com Subject: Re: I'm afraid you broke Wine on FreeBSD 3.3 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, David Elliott wrote: > > Sorry about that. It is due to the header files having an ifdef linux > > around them. > > Seriously, code like > > #ifdef linux > /* Copy of info from 2.2.x kernel */ > #define SG_MAX_SENSE 16 /* too little, unlikely to change in 2.2.x */ > > really seems quite bad to me! One should never just copy code from system > headers and I really think Alexandre never should have approved something > like that. > > As a matter of fact I have been disappointed several times lately when > Alexandre applied patches that broke Wine on non-Linux platforms due to > typos or "there's nothing apart from Linux" coding. :-( > > What's the purpose of an extremely strict development model if even the > simplest such issues are not caught during patch review? > > Anyway, the patch below brings Wine back into buildworld on FreeBSD 3.4. > > Gerald > Actually, that is not at all Alexandre's fault. While I didn't like the idea of copying kernel headers, that was how it was originally done. Basically all I did was move the Linux headers out of aspi.h and into winescsi.h but then forgot the appropriate ifdef's in the new file source file I created. I'll go ahead and send that patch to wine-patches then. I suppose we could require kernel headers and do a configure test for them and stuff. With a modern distribution you should have kernel headers installed even if you don't have the kernel source. You can do that in RedHat at least, I would assume other distros have similar packaging designs. -Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 12 23:32: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from knight.cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A55737B5C0; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:31:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cracauer@knight.cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by knight.cons.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA25958; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:31:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 08:31:38 +0100 From: Martin Cracauer To: Andre Albsmeier Cc: "Sean O'Connell" , Andrew Gallatin , FreeBSD emulation , cracauer@FreeBSD.ORG, marcel@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux_base 6.1 may work now Message-ID: <20000313083137.A25830@cons.org> References: <14538.64168.213977.432746@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20000311235754.A5556@stat.Duke.EDU> <20000312154020.A486@internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000312154020.A486@internal>; from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de on Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 03:40:20PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > There was a commit yesterday which may have fixed the linux problem. > > > I don't have an x86 handy to play with -- can you see if it makes > > > splus et al run with linux_base 6.1? [my commit] > > > Change the default FPU control word so that exceptions for new > > > processes are now masked until set by fpsetmask(3). > > > > Confirmed for -STABLE with acroread 4.05! Folks, I am surprised that this affected the Linux emulator. Emulators should set the default FPU control word to what the native kernel would, they should not inherit this value from the one that FreeBSD assigns to its native processes. Although FreeBSD-4.0 now defaults to what Linux and Solaris expect, this should be fixed in the Linux and Solaris emulators. Because the FreeBSD control word may still be set to the old value by users and/or a dynamic scheme for FreeBSD processes may be implemented. Is a person who feels responsible for the svr4 emulator on the CC: list of this message? Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 13 17: 2:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com (imo-d03.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D1537B691 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:02:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from AzWoman@aol.com) Received: from AzWoman@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v25.3.) id n.76.22433be (4559) for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 20:01:53 -0500 (EST) From: AzWoman@aol.com Message-ID: <76.22433be.25fee981@aol.com> Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 20:01:53 EST Subject: FreeBSD To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 66 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am back to school, and doing a group project on YAHOO. What is FreeBSD. Our group project is on how Yahooo uses other computers, not how the end user uses Yahoo. Any Help? Thanks D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 5:32:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from drawbridge.ctc.com (drawbridge.ctc.com [147.160.99.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BC237B777; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:32:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cameron@ctc.com) Received: from server2.ctc.com (server2.ctc.com [147.160.1.4]) by drawbridge.ctc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA25928; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:32:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from ctcjst-mail1.ctc.com (ctcjst-mail1.ctc.com [147.160.34.4]) by server2.ctc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA08484; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:31:34 -0500 (EST) Received: by ctcjst-mail1.ctc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:21:56 -0500 Message-ID: <604CC98C4E6BD311AEF900A0C9EA54E1878B91@ctcjst-mail1.ctc.com> From: "Cameron, Frank" To: "'freebsd-question@freebsd.org'" Cc: "'AzWoman@aol.com'" , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:21:53 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Transfering this to questions. . . D, Check out: www.freebsd.org www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ.html www.freebsd.org/handbook/index.html www.freebsdmall.com/newsletter1/yahoo_and_freebsd.phtml -frank P.S. General questions should be directed to freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org. For a list of all the FreeBSD mailing lists and their charters see: www.freebsd.org/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL -----Original Message----- From: AzWoman@aol.com [mailto:AzWoman@aol.com] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 8:02 PM To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: FreeBSD I am back to school, and doing a group project on YAHOO. What is FreeBSD. Our group project is on how Yahooo uses other computers, not how the end user uses Yahoo. Any Help? Thanks D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 5:42:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat200.164.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.200.164]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C95D37B513 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:42:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA53333; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:42:22 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:42:22 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: Stephanie Finkelstein Cc: Geoff Smith , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, marketing@vmware.com Subject: Re: FW: VMware under FreeBSD ... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Stephanie ... After spending some time working with VMWare under FreeBSD (thanks to the work that Vladimir N. Silyaev did to get things working nicely), I'm interested in getting a permanent license for it ... has there been any progress made on getting a full port made to FreeBSD, as well as an appropriate license (ie. one that doesn't say 'for Linux' in it)? Thanks ... On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Stephanie Finkelstein wrote: > Dear Marc > > Thank you very much for your interest in VMware. > > We appreciate feedback, and we will look in to your suggestion to include > FreeBSD as an option in the registration form. > > Thanks for taking the time to write us. > > Sincerely, > > Stephanie Finkelstein > VMware, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 10:18 PM > To: webmaster@vmware.com; feature-request@vmware.com > Subject: VMware under FreeBSD ... > > > > I'm currently evaluating the VMWare port that is available for FreeBSD, > and, if all works well, will be licensing a copy for that ... > > But, I think that it would be nice if your online registration form had a > 'FreeBSD' option as to Host OS, so that those of us that do use FreeBSD > can provide an indication of the kind of market you could see by doing a > full port to it ... > > Thanks... > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: > Scrappy > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: > scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 5:50:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat200.164.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.200.164]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14A937B751 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 05:50:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA53371 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:50:28 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:50:28 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: VMWare port(s) ... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is anyone working on getting the rtc/linux_procfs ports brought into the main stream, as well as the vmware port itself upgraded? Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 7:26:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from melete.ch.intel.com (melete.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8397E37B59D for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 07:26:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com) Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21]) by melete.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.19 2000/01/29 00:15:43 dmccart Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA09370; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 15:28:01 GMT Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68]) by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.10 2000/02/10 21:38:16 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id IAA07460; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:25:33 -0700 (MST) X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Received: (from jreynold@localhost) by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id KAA23424; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 10:26:34 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f From: John Reynolds~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14542.23082.67770.640747@hip186.ch.intel.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:26:34 -0700 (MST) To: AzWoman@aol.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <76.22433be.25fee981@aol.com> References: <76.22433be.25fee981@aol.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.3.11 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ On Monday, March 13, AzWoman@aol.com wrote: ] > I am back to school, and doing a group project on YAHOO. What is FreeBSD. > Our group project is on how Yahooo uses other computers, not how the end user > uses Yahoo. > Any Help? > Thanks FreeBSD is an operating system for x86 and alpha architecture PCs. Yahoo uses FreeBSD as the operating system for thousands of its server machines (i.e. instead of windows NT or Linux, etc.). This question (and all further questions you might have) stands a better chance at actually being answered if you send it to questions@freebsd.org. This mailing list is for emulation issues only. -Jr -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | John Reynolds WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction | | Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 602-868-6512 | | jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 9:26:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from atlrel1.hp.com (atlrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AC337B6C8 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:26:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@cup.hp.com) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by atlrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697641211; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:26:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.3 TIS 5.0.1) id JAA09899; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:26:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38CE7645.F59CB8DA@cup.hp.com> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:26:29 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: The Hermit Hacker Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMWare port(s) ... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > Is anyone working on getting the rtc/linux_procfs ports brought into the > main stream, as well as the vmware port itself upgraded? Having a Linux compatible procfs for Linux binaries has been on my TODO list for some time. I'm not currently working on that, though. I personally prefer a procfs implementation that doesn't need to be loaded as a module, but is part of the Linuxulator itself and also uses /proc as the mount point. Such an implementation is less confusing (ie doesn't generate a stream of questions of which the answer is: "load linux_procfs" :-). The expected infrastructural changes in the kernel to have the proper procfs implementation depending on the ABI also helps other emulators. Such an approach seems beneficial... Thoughts, ideas or other comments? -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 9:44: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from geneva.vmware.com (geneva.vmware.com [205.178.44.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1971737B707 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:43:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stephanie@vmware.com) Received: from portland (portland [205.178.44.101]) by geneva.vmware.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA29801; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:43:47 -0800 From: "Stephanie Finkelstein" To: "The Hermit Hacker" Cc: "Geoff Smith" , , Subject: RE: FW: VMware under FreeBSD ... Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:44:15 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear Marc, I'm glad that you're interested in a license. However, at this time we still have no plans to support FreeBSD as a host. Thanks for your interest, and for taking the time to write us. Regards, Stephanie VMware, Inc. stephanie@vmware.com -----Original Message----- From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 5:42 AM To: Stephanie Finkelstein Cc: Geoff Smith; freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; marketing@vmware.com Subject: Re: FW: VMware under FreeBSD ... Hi Stephanie ... After spending some time working with VMWare under FreeBSD (thanks to the work that Vladimir N. Silyaev did to get things working nicely), I'm interested in getting a permanent license for it ... has there been any progress made on getting a full port made to FreeBSD, as well as an appropriate license (ie. one that doesn't say 'for Linux' in it)? Thanks ... On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Stephanie Finkelstein wrote: > Dear Marc > > Thank you very much for your interest in VMware. > > We appreciate feedback, and we will look in to your suggestion to include > FreeBSD as an option in the registration form. > > Thanks for taking the time to write us. > > Sincerely, > > Stephanie Finkelstein > VMware, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:scrappy@hub.org] > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 10:18 PM > To: webmaster@vmware.com; feature-request@vmware.com > Subject: VMware under FreeBSD ... > > > > I'm currently evaluating the VMWare port that is available for FreeBSD, > and, if all works well, will be licensing a copy for that ... > > But, I think that it would be nice if your online registration form had a > 'FreeBSD' option as to Host OS, so that those of us that do use FreeBSD > can provide an indication of the kind of market you could see by doing a > full port to it ... > > Thanks... > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: > Scrappy > Systems Administrator @ hub.org > primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: > scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org > > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 14 11:56:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F5E37B7E1 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:56:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16902; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:56:23 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA08229; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:55:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:55:53 -0500 (EST) To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: The Hermit Hacker , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMWare port(s) ... In-Reply-To: <38CE7645.F59CB8DA@cup.hp.com> References: <38CE7645.F59CB8DA@cup.hp.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14542.37673.790614.348267@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marcel Moolenaar writes: > The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > Is anyone working on getting the rtc/linux_procfs ports brought into the > > main stream, as well as the vmware port itself upgraded? > > Having a Linux compatible procfs for Linux binaries has been on my TODO > list for some time. I'm not currently working on that, though. I > personally prefer a procfs implementation that doesn't need to be loaded > as a module, but is part of the Linuxulator itself and also uses /proc > as the mount point. Such an implementation is less confusing (ie doesn't > generate a stream of questions of which the answer is: "load > linux_procfs" :-). The expected infrastructural changes in the kernel to > have the proper procfs implementation depending on the ABI also helps > other emulators. Such an approach seems beneficial... > > Thoughts, ideas or other comments? > Sure. Ditch our native procfs & adopt the linux procfs interface as standard (eg, mount it on /proc). This would allow us to do away with most of the groveling around in kvm & thereby most of the problems caused by running kernels which are mismatched to their userlands. As a long-time -current user, I'm really quite jealous that you can mix-n-match linux kernels & userlands. Sure, there would be a few more gnu programs in src/contrib, but it would be so much easier to deal with. (ducks, runs for cover..) Drew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 15 0:12:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1D337B8BB for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:12:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igiveup@ix.netcom.com) Received: from ix.netcom.com (user-2ini8gv.dialup.mindspring.com [165.121.34.31]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA00571 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 03:12:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <38CF45F6.7316C9AD@ix.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 00:12:38 -0800 From: Ben Speirs X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Patches to Wine work ... Almost Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I had to add an additional "#ifdef linux" to make it compile. See diff output below. Feel free to make corrections. I was just guessing based on the compiler errors. Thanks. -- -Ben Speirs (I'm not on the mailing list, hope you don't mind the input) diff -c -3 -p aspi.c.orig aspi.c *** aspi.c.orig Sun Mar 12 12:19:23 2000 --- aspi.c Tue Mar 14 23:54:34 2000 *************** HKEY_DYN_DATA *** 40,45 **** --- 40,46 ---- DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(aspi); /* Internal function prototypes */ + #ifdef linux static void SCSI_GetProcinfo(); *************** SCSI_Init() *** 50,55 **** --- 51,57 ---- /* For now we just call SCSI_GetProcinfo */ SCSI_GetProcinfo(); } + #endif int ASPI_GetNumControllers() To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 15 12:57:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from madli.ut.ee (madli.ut.ee [193.40.5.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB5037BB16 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 12:57:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ants_a@ut.ee) Received: (from ants_a@localhost) by madli.ut.ee (8.10.0/8.10.0/madli-1.12) id e2FKv5l25290; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:57:05 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <20000315225705.B9797@madli.ut.ee> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:57:05 +0200 From: Ants Aader To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: SAS Institute to port SAS software to Linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, http://www.sas.com/new/preleases/031400/news1.html I hope that FreeBSD will support SAS through emulation as soon as possible. Ants Aader aader@ebc.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 15 22:17:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5569A37BA56 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:17:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07396; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:17:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38D07C85.A271E634@gorean.org> Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 22:17:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-0313 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ants Aader Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SAS Institute to port SAS software to Linux References: <20000315225705.B9797@madli.ut.ee> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ants Aader wrote: > > Hi, > > http://www.sas.com/new/preleases/031400/news1.html > > I hope that FreeBSD will support SAS through emulation as soon as possible. We eagerly await your patches! :) -- "While the future's there for anyone to change, still you know it seems, it would be easier sometimes to change the past" - Jackson Browne, "Fountain of Sorrow" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 15 23: 7:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5B637BA56 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 23:07:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA08658; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 01:07:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 01:07:03 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Doug Barton Cc: Ants Aader , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SAS Institute to port SAS software to Linux Message-ID: <20000316010702.A8570@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20000315225705.B9797@madli.ut.ee> <38D07C85.A271E634@gorean.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.5i In-Reply-To: <38D07C85.A271E634@gorean.org>; from "Doug Barton" on Wed Mar 15 22:17:41 GMT 2000 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In the last episode (Mar 15), Doug Barton said: > Ants Aader wrote: > > http://www.sas.com/new/preleases/031400/news1.html > > > > I hope that FreeBSD will support SAS through emulation as soon as > > possible. > > We eagerly await your patches! :) I don't anticipate any problems myself. The SAS server isn't anything special; it's certainly not as complicated as Oracle's multi-process synchronization. I only hope that they build it with 64-bit filesize support (which Linux is apparently finally supporting). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 15 23:51:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.net [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EAB37BBA0 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 23:51:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from regnauld@ftf.net) Received: from ns.int.ftf.net (fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged)) by mail.ftf.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3/gw-ftf-1.2) with ESMTP id IAA14216; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:54:02 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host fw2.ftf.dk [192.168.1.2] (may be forged) claimed to be ns.int.ftf.net Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by ns.int.ftf.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) id IAA84771; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:58:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20000316085759.05506@ns.int.ftf.net> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 08:57:59 +0100 From: Phil Regnauld To: Doug Barton Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SAS Institute to port SAS software to Linux References: <20000315225705.B9797@madli.ut.ee> <38D07C85.A271E634@gorean.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <38D07C85.A271E634@gorean.org>; from Doug Barton on Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 10:17:41PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386 Organization: FTFnet Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Doug Barton writes: > Ants Aader wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > http://www.sas.com/new/preleases/031400/news1.html > > > > I hope that FreeBSD will support SAS through emulation as soon as possible. > > We eagerly await your patches! :) Wow, cool, now we can bring FreeBSD down to the performance of an overloaded NT server. -- You can take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake up in front of your Windows PC, and you believe whatever you want to believe. Or you take the red pill and you stay in UNIXland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. http://www.BSD-Dk.dk/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Mar 18 20:48:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from matrix.buckhorn.net (matrix.buckhorn.net [208.129.165.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BF037B6A0; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 20:48:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bob@buckhorn.net) Received: from buckhorn.net (nebula.buckhorn.net [208.129.165.66]) by matrix.buckhorn.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18310; Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:48:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@buckhorn.net) Message-ID: <38D45C93.D5C6B1BC@buckhorn.net> Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:50:27 -0600 From: Bob Martin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc To: questions@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: CDE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone know where I can find CDE that will run on BSD? Bob -- "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." -- Albert Einstein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message