From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Nov 18 10:34:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9103337B401 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:34:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from thor.acuson.com (thor.acuson.com [157.226.71.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B49543E4A for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:34:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch02.acuson.com (mvaexch02.acuson.com [157.226.230.209]) by thor.acuson.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H5S00LDWBLN7P@thor.acuson.com> for freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mvaexch02.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:30:13 -0800 Received: from balderdash.acuson.com (dhcp-46-132.acuson.com [157.226.46.132]) by mvaexch01.acuson.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id V00LMQQ2; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:32:15 -0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:34:30 -0800 From: Johnson David Subject: The worst security problems? To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <200211181034.30828.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Organization: Siemens Medical Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Here's a story about how a recent report on security vulnerabilities was skewed in Microsoft's favor. "In my opinion, the result was misleading in that many readers and editors would have seen this as an FBI certification of the relative equality of security problems between systems running Microsoft Windows and those running Unix." http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/1111.fbi.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Mon Nov 18 17:22:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5044637B404 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtiwmhc14.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc14.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1DB43E91 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:22:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eminker@att.net) Received: from mtiwebc16 ([204.127.135.42]) by mtiwmhc14.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.12 201-253-122-126-112-20020820) with SMTP id <20021119012206.DHEA21264.mtiwmhc14.worldnet.att.net@mtiwebc16> for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:22:06 +0000 Received: from [67.96.112.139] by mtiwebc16; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:22:04 +0000 From: eminker@att.net To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Help Needed for FreeBSD Presentation Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:22:04 +0000 X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 23 2002) X-Authenticated-Sender: MjQ4ZkJGO0g0WEhjL0U+Z1MvMSw6YFRRQWE+YkEqOA== Message-Id: <20021119012206.DHEA21264.mtiwmhc14.worldnet.att.net@mtiwebc16> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I was hoping that someone might know of a listing of businesses using FreeBSD. In the not too distant past, I've seen online articles, but I can't seem to find anything today. Any help would be greatly appreciated as I am doing a presentation of FreeBSD vs Windows (TCO and Stability) and would like some ammunition. -- Regards, Evan M Inker To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 2:45:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B0437B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:45:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from t-indiv5-88.athome.tue.nl (t-indiv5-88.athome.tue.nl [131.155.241.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0536B43EA3 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:45:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 66928 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2002 10:45:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO amd760.piwebs.com) (192.168.0.100) by 0 with SMTP; 19 Nov 2002 10:45:44 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: 5.0-DP2 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:45:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200211191145.12974.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Now that 5.0-DP2 is out, isn't it a good idea to make a press release out= of=20 it, that the media can quote from? Remember, we need to hype 5.0... Arjan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 4:27: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EDC37B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 04:26:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C6243E3B for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 04:26:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fwd04.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18E7Sv-0004Ud-00; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:26:53 +0100 Received: from jhs.muc.de (520006753247-0001@[217.228.213.53]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18E7Se-0t1hnEC; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:26:36 +0100 Received: from flip.jhs.private (flip.jhs.private [192.168.91.24]) by jhs.muc.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJCUxC53188; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:31:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from flip.jhs.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flip.jhs.private (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJCUas94546; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:30:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@flip.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200211191230.gAJCUas94546@flip.jhs.private> To: Arjan van Leeuwen Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2 In-Reply-To: Message from Arjan van Leeuwen of "Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:45:12 +0100." <200211191145.12974.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:30:36 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" X-Sender: 520006753247-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > Now that 5.0-DP2 is out, isn't it a good idea to make a press release out of > it, that the media can quote from? Remember, we need to hype 5.0... Until `cvs -r RELENG_5_0_RELEASE src` delivers, I'd suggest caution in case release builders have to withdraw something. Julian Stacey jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer & Unix Consultant, Munich. Ihr Rauchen = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz ! Schnupftabak probieren. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 4:52:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC0437B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 04:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from progress-neva.ru (Progress-Neva-1.vmb-service.ru [80.73.195.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4827C43E3B for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 04:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kubyshkin@progress-neva.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by progress-neva.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id PAA07793 for freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org.KAV; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:59:35 GMT Received: from dmitry ([192.168.20.7]) by progress-neva.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id PAA07785 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:59:35 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: progress-neva.ru: Host [192.168.20.7] claimed to be dmitry Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:49:26 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?69XC2dvLyc4g5M3J1NLJyg==?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?69XC2dvLyc4g5M3J1NLJyg==?= Organization: =?koi8-r?B?8NLPx9LF09Mg7sXXwQ==?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <18921624140.20021119154926@progress-neva.ru> To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.org Subject: help MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG help To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 5:14:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A823C37B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:14:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from proxy.centtech.com (moat.centtech.com [207.200.51.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A134443E88 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:14:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from sprint.centtech.com (sprint.centtech.com [10.177.173.31]) by proxy.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJDE8c22236; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:14:09 -0600 (CST) Received: (from root@localhost) by sprint.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id gAJDE8d28516; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:14:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from centtech.com (electron [204.177.173.173]) by sprint.centtech.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJDE4X28501; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:14:05 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3DDA391B.40104@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:14:03 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: Arjan van Leeuwen , advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2 References: <200211191230.gAJCUas94546@flip.jhs.private> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > >>Now that 5.0-DP2 is out, isn't it a good idea to make a press release out of >>it, that the media can quote from? Remember, we need to hype 5.0... > > > Until `cvs -r RELENG_5_0_RELEASE src` delivers, I'd suggest caution in > case release builders have to withdraw something. I think we can still hype it up - without disclosing much. We can do just the same as everyone else - make a big deal about DP2, and what it means to the community, how people "feel" about it, blah blah. Just something to get people recognizing that FreeBSD 5.0 is coming and all should be getting ready to enjoy the benefits. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Beware the fury of a patient man. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 5:29:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBBB37B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from isy.liu.se (isy.liu.se [130.236.48.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1889243E77 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:29:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@isy.liu.se) Received: from isy.liu.se (tuttle.isy.liu.se [130.236.49.189]) by isy.liu.se (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id gAJDT2202946; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:29:03 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:29:50 +0100 Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v546) Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG To: Eric Anderson From: Michael Josefsson In-Reply-To: <3DDA391B.40104@centtech.com> Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.546) Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Precisely. Get people primed for the release. When it is released everyone should feel they want to take the natural step and deploy it. Take a peek at how Microsoft et al do. Raise expectations enormously. Disclose some well defined issues (like that irritating paper clip helper or something --- mind you FreeBSD have better things). People will talk about it and that's the point. Nothing succeeds like success! Press releases (releasii:) are always good material. /Micke On tisdag, nov 19, 2002, at 14:14 Europe/Stockholm, Eric Anderson wrote: > Julian H. Stacey wrote: >> Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: >>> Now that 5.0-DP2 is out, isn't it a good idea to make a press >>> release out of it, that the media can quote from? Remember, we need >>> to hype 5.0... >> Until `cvs -r RELENG_5_0_RELEASE src` delivers, I'd suggest caution >> in >> case release builders have to withdraw something. > > I think we can still hype it up - without disclosing much. We can do > just the same as everyone else - make a big deal about DP2, and what > it means to the community, how people "feel" about it, blah blah. > Just something to get people recognizing that FreeBSD 5.0 is coming > and all should be getting ready to enjoy the benefits. > > Eric > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology > Beware the fury of a patient man. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 5:31:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8931F37B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B59C43E4A for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 05:31:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fwd11.sul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18E8T0-0005KG-03; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:31:02 +0100 Received: from jhs.muc.de (520006753247-0001@[217.228.213.53]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18E8Sy-20s7zEC; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:31:00 +0100 Received: from flip.jhs.private (flip.jhs.private [192.168.91.24]) by jhs.muc.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJDZOC53354; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:35:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from flip.jhs.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flip.jhs.private (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAJDYrs94960; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:34:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@flip.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200211191334.gAJDYrs94960@flip.jhs.private> To: Eric Anderson Cc: Arjan van Leeuwen , advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2 In-Reply-To: Message from Eric Anderson of "Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:14:03 CST." <3DDA391B.40104@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 14:34:52 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" X-Sender: 520006753247-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eric Anderson wrote: > Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > > > >>Now that 5.0-DP2 is out, isn't it a good idea to make a press release out o > f > >>it, that the media can quote from? Remember, we need to hype 5.0... > > > > > > Until `cvs -r RELENG_5_0_RELEASE src` delivers, I'd suggest caution in > > case release builders have to withdraw something. > > I think we can still hype it up - without disclosing much. We can do > just the same as everyone else - make a big deal about DP2, and what it > means to the community, how people "feel" about it, blah blah. Just > something to get people recognizing that FreeBSD 5.0 is coming and all > should be getting ready to enjoy the benefits. > > Eric Sounds a good middle course :-) Julian Stacey jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer & Unix Consultant, Munich. Ihr Rauchen = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz ! Schnupftabak probieren. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Nov 19 10:56:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C303A37B401 for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:56:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from thor.acuson.com (thor.acuson.com [157.226.71.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFD543E9C for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:56:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch02.acuson.com (mvaexch02.acuson.com [157.226.230.209]) by thor.acuson.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H5U00MK27AMG6@thor.acuson.com> for advocacy@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mvaexch02.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:52:23 -0800 Received: from balderdash.acuson.com (dhcp-46-188.acuson.com [157.226.46.188]) by mvaexch01.acuson.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id V00LNDTR; Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:54:27 -0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:56:44 -0800 From: Johnson David Subject: Re: 5.0-DP2 In-reply-to: <200211191145.12974.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> To: advocacy@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <200211191056.44469.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Organization: Siemens Medical Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200211191145.12974.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 19 November 2002 02:45 am, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > Now that 5.0-DP2 is out, isn't it a good idea to make a press release out > of it, that the media can quote from? Remember, we need to hype 5.0... Since I was challenged to offer benefits corresponding with 5.0 features, here's a tentative list for a few features that strike my fancy... FreeBSD now has additional support from many hot-swappable devices, such as Firewire and USB modems. New classes of consumer devices are available to the FreeBSD user, increasing the value of their hardware investment. FreeBSD now supports an extensible Mandatory Access Control framework and filesystem Access Control Lists (ACLs). A robust and flexible security framework lets systems administrators sleep easily. Access to sensitive company data can be easily partitioned among development groups. The uvisor(4) driver for connecting Handspring Visors via USB has been added. Users of FreeBSD can now use their Handspring Visors with all of their systems at home or at work. Support for the 80386 processor has been removed from the GENERIC kernel. The default FreeBSD kernel is now more optimized for modern CPUs. No longer do you have to settle for performance draining compatibility with hardware you haven't owned in a decade. ``Zero copy'' support has been added to the networking stack. This eliminates one of the more significant bottlenecks in network throughput, improving the performance of your network servers and front line portals. FreeBSD can now treat ATA devices as SCSI devices. Software that expects SCSI hardware can now be used even if your hardware is the common and inexpensive ATA format. Now there is no need to reboot into another operating system to burn your Compact Discs. Preliminary Cardbus support under NEWCARD has been added. Installing and using FreeBSD on laptops has never been easier! Drivers have been added to support the Direct Rendering Infrastructure, which can used to provide 3D acceleration within XFree86. Faster graphics and higher framerates means that FreeBSD is more suitable than ever for 3D gaming and scientific simulations. fsck now has support for background checks, speeding up the boot process. Harddrives can now be checked while you work on other tasks. gcc has been updated to version 3.2.1. The full power of C++ templates and the STL are available to the developer, while gaining even greater code optimization. FreeBSD packages are now compressed with bzip2, a more efficient data compression method than gzip. Packages smaller and consume less of your valuable bandwidth and storage. A network install of FreeBSD will be faster than ever. That's it... Just some ideas... David Johnson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 1:56: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE5D37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:56:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from dl36061.travelcheap.com (dl36061.travelcheap.com [198.172.138.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51B543E6E for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Knives@Zapo.Net) Received: from mail.Zapo.Net ([67.234.73.27]) by dl36061.travelcheap.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 35-65457U3000L300S0V35) with ESMTP id com; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 04:57:44 -0500 Message-ID: <000043783591$00000bff$00003d83@mail.Zapo.Net> To: From: "Damascus" Subject: Award Winning TiNives 5th Year Anniversary 20% Savings Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 03:55:45 -1800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: Knives@Zapo.Net X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: USANET web-mailer (34FM.0700.4.03) Sensitivity: Confidential X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
TiNives Custom Shop provides specialty handle coatings, inlay of preciuos metals, and titanium contoured handles with a variety of texturing. Blade material consist of an assortment of Devin Thomas damascus, Damasteel damascus, 154 CM (option for black diamond coating).
Visit Us at: www.tinives.com
Offer Expires December 30, 2002. Offer not available with other discounts.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 5:51:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6283937B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 05:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061D643E9E for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 05:51:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gALDpLx2063237 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:51:21 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost) by happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gALDpFZR063236 for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:51:15 GMT Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 13:51:15 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: TheRegister article on Hotmail Message-ID: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.43 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/28226.html Cites an internal MS white paper discussing switching Hotmail from Unix over to Win2k, which ends up sounding like a sales pitch for FreeBSD... Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 7:27:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF80337B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:27:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89A743EAC for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:27:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gALFRH962861 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:27:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <006d01c29172$7abb7500$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:27:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is MS still trying to port Hotmail to Windows?? Hotmail is a good example of exactly the kind of environment that will probably _never_ benefit from migration to Windows. Single-purpose, high-volume applications work best with stripped, simple operating systems that are designed to do nothing but achieve that purpose as efficiently as possible; this is diametrically opposed to the philosophy of a do-it-all, general-purpose, GUI-based operating system such as Windows. And as Microsoft itself apparently admits, UNIX is admirably suited to this type of use, since it is simple to begin with and can be stripped further for speed by any qualified administrator. MS was already looking to replace Hotmail's custom SMTP (IIRC) with Microsoft Exchange Server years ago, but Exchange just would not scale, and Exchange Server is ill-suited to simple, high-volume environments (although it is ideally suited to lower-volume, complex environments such as internal corporate mail systems). Still, anything is possible if you can throw enough hardware at it, and if you are willing and able to tweak software until it looks like what you should have installed in the first place. One reason MS is so hellbent on this, incidentally, is that the company was constantly belittled by customers back in the days when it sold Microsoft Mail. See, Microsoft never actually used Microsoft Mail internally; the company itself used the MS Mail client, true ... but it used a Xenix-based back-end that was never sold to customers in place of the standard MS Mail MS-DOS-based MTA. Customers knew this and humuliated Microsoft regularly over the fact. When Microsoft Exchange Server was released, Microsoft vowed to move all internal e-mail to Exchange ... and it did. It took a while, but the migration went well, and Microsoft Exchange Server is perfectly suited to Microsoft's internal use (in fact, some design features were influenced by Microsoft's own practices). It also happens to be well suited to just about any other corporate or organizational e-mail environment, much more so than SMTP or similar bare-bones e-mail systems. Microsoft's dream, though, extended further, to using Microsoft Exchange Server (which represented a staggering development investment for the company) for ISPs and heterogenous, Internet-based e-mail systems. But Exchange Server has never really been able to handle that. The same feature-rich design and resulting bloat that makes the e-mail systems arguably the best anyone can buy for internal corporate use also makes it a poor choice for high-volume, feature-lean, heterogenous environments such as Internet Service Providers ... and Hotmail. The fact is, one size does not fit all, and you simply cannot write an e-mail system and OS that will be all things to all people. Windows and Exchange definitely have very secure places in the IT world, but they can't do all e-mail for everyone, and Hotmail is just about as far from the ideal case for Exchange as any e-mail system can be (even standard SMTP really was never quite suitable for Hotmail, and had to be modified). The attempt to convert Hotmail to Windows and Exchange is a good example of politics and marketing overruling common sense. I often think that nobody is really fooled by this except Microsoft itself. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Seaman" To: Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 14:51 Subject: TheRegister article on Hotmail > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/28226.html > > Cites an internal MS white paper discussing switching Hotmail from > Unix over to Win2k, which ends up sounding like a sales pitch for > FreeBSD... > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 8: 0: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4429437B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:00:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from rhadamanth.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust47.cdf.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E5943E3B for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:00:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 18EtkG-000Hvd-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:00:00 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:00:00 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Message-ID: <20021121160000.GA68892@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Anthony Atkielski , FreeBSD Advocacy References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <006d01c29172$7abb7500$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006d01c29172$7abb7500$0a00000a@atkielski.com> X-message-flag: All your linuxconf-configured redhat are belong to us. X-message-flag-attribution: suresh, sdm. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 04:27:18PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Is MS still trying to port Hotmail to Windows?? Hotmail is a good example > of exactly the kind of environment that will probably _never_ benefit from > migration to Windows. > The attempt to convert Hotmail to Windows and Exchange is a good example of > politics and marketing overruling common sense. I often think that nobody > is really fooled by this except Microsoft itself. If you actually read the article, you'll see that they are converting the web servers. > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/28226.html Ceri -- I am the axe of a 250 pound woman! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 8: 3:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D737B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:03:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E96043E8A for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:03:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gALG3b963158 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:03:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <007f01c29177$8e2106a0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <006d01c29172$7abb7500$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021121160000.GA68892@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:03:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ceri writes: > If you actually read the article, you'll see that > they are converting the web servers. I did read the article, and both the front-end and the back-end servers are mentioned. In any case, the same observations I've already made (albeit to a lesser extent) apply to front-end web servers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 8:15: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0482E37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from rhadamanth.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust47.cdf.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABB543E42 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:14:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 18Etyf-000Hyi-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:14:53 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:14:53 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Message-ID: <20021121161453.GA69019@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Anthony Atkielski , FreeBSD Advocacy References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <006d01c29172$7abb7500$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021121160000.GA68892@submonkey.net> <007f01c29177$8e2106a0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <007f01c29177$8e2106a0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> X-message-flag: All your linuxconf-configured redhat are belong to us. X-message-flag-attribution: suresh, sdm. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 05:03:38PM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Ceri writes: > > > If you actually read the article, you'll see that > > they are converting the web servers. > > I did read the article, and both the front-end and the back-end servers are > mentioned. grep -i exchange shows no matches, and grep -i smtp only brings up one match where it says "The SMTP service of IIS was used to handle outgoing mail", and this is referring to the webservers themselves. > In any case, the same observations I've already made (albeit to > a lesser extent) apply to front-end web servers. Only this one (which I like, and will probably quote at parties ;) : Still, anything is possible if you can throw enough hardware at it, and if you are willing and able to tweak software until it looks like what you should have installed in the first place. The rest of your mail was about Exchange and how it isn't suited to Hotmail, which nobody said anyway. Sorry for jumping on you anyway. Ceri -- By the fearless blood! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 8:26: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A156037B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C8D43E4A for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 08:26:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gALGPv963323 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:25:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <006d01c29172$7abb7500$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021121160000.GA68892@submonkey.net> <007f01c29177$8e2106a0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021121161453.GA69019@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:25:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ceri writes: > The rest of your mail was about Exchange and > how it isn't suited to Hotmail, which nobody > said anyway. If they are converting Hotmail mail servers to Windows, they are converting to Exchange. Microsoft really doesn't have any other e-mail products worth mentioning; they put pretty much all their eggs into one basket with Exchange. Besides, there wouldn't be much point (ideologically or technically) to converting to Windows just to run a Windows version of sendmail. If they are still running Apache on the front-end, that very much surprises me, as I had understood that they went to IIS for the front end long ago. The corporate site (microsoft.com) has been on IIS for ages; it takes a tremendous amount of hardware to do the job, especially given the penchant of Microsoft to make every single last page on the Web site an ASP page (such that the servers spend a great deal of their time executing scripts), but it can be done. Despite all that hardware, Microsoft's site is invariably slow to respond, probably because of the six billion lines of VBScript and Javascript that it must execute on the server for each page served. (I sometimes get the impression that, from Microsoft's standpoint, a mere document containing only data is somehow unacceptable, and everything must also contain executable code before it is satisfactory--clearly developers rule in some respects at MS!) Anyway, converting from UNIX to Windows makes no sense for high-volume, dedicated server farms with critical uptime requirements. It does make sense in some other environments, where other considerations are paramount (ease of use for the uninitiated, flexibility and features, GUI support, etc.). Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is just as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that many people try it anyway just proves that there are irrational and fanatical people on both sides of the fence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 10:53:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED8C37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:53:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from thor.acuson.com (thor.acuson.com [157.226.71.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA0A43E88 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:53:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch02.acuson.com (mvaexch02.acuson.com [157.226.230.209]) by thor.acuson.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H5X002A6WH9D5@thor.acuson.com> for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:53:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by mvaexch02.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:49:08 -0800 Received: from balderdash.acuson.com (dhcp-46-188.acuson.com [157.226.46.188]) by mvaexch01.acuson.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id V00L3KLV; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:51:14 -0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:53:33 -0800 From: Johnson David Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail In-reply-to: <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a@atkielski.com> To: FreeBSD Advocacy Message-id: <200211211053.33411.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Organization: Siemens Medical Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <20021121161453.GA69019@submonkey.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is just > as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that many > people try it anyway just proves that there are irrational and fanatical > people on both sides of the fence. Mac OSX is absurd? David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 11:31:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B6E37B43F for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:31:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail17.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984FF43E6E for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:31:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 26430 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2002 19:31:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) by mail17.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 21 Nov 2002 19:31:25 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gALJVI2D039363; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:31:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.2 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200211211053.33411.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:31:23 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Johnson David Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21-Nov-2002 Johnson David wrote: > >> Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is just >> as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that many >> people try it anyway just proves that there are irrational and fanatical >> people on both sides of the fence. > > Mac OSX is absurd? Only to people who haven't used it. :) Ignorance is bliss, didn't you know? :) -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 11:33:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB6C37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F3B43E42 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 11:33:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gALJXY965060 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:33:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <008f01c29194$e1cd9850$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121135115.GA63164@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophi> <20021121161453.GA69019@submonkey.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <200211211053.33411.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 20:33:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David writes: > Mac OSX is absurd? Mac OS X has a tremendous amount of proprietary code added to it to make it a dedicated desktop. It's arguable that UNIX was still a poor choice for the underlying OS, but I'm sure it was orders of magnitude cheaper than writing a completely new OS, which Apple probably could not afford. Anyway, obviously if you add enough code to an operating system, you can make it usable for just about any purpose--and that's what Apple did. (See my previous comments on throwing hardware at a problem and "tweaking" the OS ... same principle.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Thu Nov 21 12:43:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0C37B401 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:43:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from w3c.sp0x.net (w3c.sp0x.net [217.97.202.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3EF43E97 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ftyczka@ftyczka.org) Received: from pc01 (unknown [192.168.1.11]) by w3c.sp0x.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF2A32F87 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:43:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:43:15 +0100 From: ftyczka X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Personal Reply-To: ftyczka X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <8817280498.20021121214315@ftyczka.org> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Recent Article MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think this is an excellent article, when it comes to recommending FreeBSD to corporations: http://www.securityoffice.net/mssecrets/hotmail.html --- Jan "ftyczka" Szumiec, 504125060 zobacz http://ftyczka.org http://wazelina.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 7: 2:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B0C37B404 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (mailhost1.bishopston.net [24.87.68.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C5D43E3B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:02:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.com) X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gAMF2aBO089969 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:02:36 GMT (envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id gAMF2a6a089963; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:02:36 GMT (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Jones Message-Id: <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail In-Reply-To: <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> X-newsgroup: sol.lists.freebsd.advocacy X-In-Response-To: anthony@freebie.atkielski.com Newsgroups: sol.lists.freebsd.advocacy X-newsgroup: sol.lists.freebsd.advocacy Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:02:36 +0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Nov 2002 16:26:08 +0000, anthony@freebie.atkielski.com wrote in newsgroup sol.lists.freebsd.advocacy: > Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is just > as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that many people > try it anyway just proves that there are irrational and fanatical people on > both sides of the fence. You were doing well up until then. For some it may not be suitable, but I'm currently sitting here with over 50 windows open on a FreeBSD X desktop, and its stable, and fast. I only boot into windows for those apps that only work on windows, but 99% of the time I sit in the FreeBSD desktop, because I use my system SERIOUSLY. Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 10:37:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2947E37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:37:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from thor.acuson.com (thor.acuson.com [157.226.71.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4836543EAF for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:37:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch02.acuson.com (mvaexch02.acuson.com [157.226.230.209]) by thor.acuson.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H5Z003TOQE3LQ@thor.acuson.com> for advocacy@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:37:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mvaexch02.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:32:46 -0800 Received: from balderdash.acuson.com (dhcp-46-188.acuson.com [157.226.46.188]) by mvaexch01.acuson.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id V00L3502; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:34:51 -0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:37:11 -0800 From: Johnson David Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail In-reply-to: <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> To: Jamie Jones , advocacy@freebsd.org Message-id: <200211221037.11131.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Organization: Siemens Medical Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 22 November 2002 07:02 am, Jamie Jones wrote: > > Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is > > just as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that > > many people try it anyway just proves that there are irrational and > > fanatical people on both sides of the fence. > > You were doing well up until then. > For some it may not be suitable, but I'm currently sitting here with over > 50 windows open on a FreeBSD X desktop, and its stable, and fast. I second that sentiment. I have FreeBSD at work and at home. Monday I had to boot into Win2K at work for ten minutes to schedule a meeting via Outlook Calendar. The rest of the week has been FreeBSD (and Solaris) only. Yesterday at home I booted into Windows to watch the LOTR:TT trailer on Quicktime. The rest of the week has been on FreeBSD. Both systems are FreeBSD 4.7, running KDE and OpenOffice. These are desktop/workstation machines, not servers. If I were a game player, then I might stick with Windows. But I'm not. All my web surfing, emailing, development, multimedia, painting and drawing, office "productivity", and solitaire needs are met in an environment that makes Windows look like a child's tool. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 15:40:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38FA37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:40:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBF443EA9 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:40:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 5C24451915; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:10:47 +1030 (CST) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:10:47 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Jamie Jones Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, 22 November 2002 at 15:02:36 +0000, Jamie Jones wrote: > On 21 Nov 2002 16:26:08 +0000, > anthony@freebie.atkielski.com > wrote in newsgroup sol.lists.freebsd.advocacy: > >> Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is just >> as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that many people >> try it anyway just proves that there are irrational and fanatical people on >> both sides of the fence. > > You were doing well up until then. > For some it may not be suitable, but I'm currently sitting here with over 50 > windows open on a FreeBSD X desktop, and its stable, and fast. Agreed 100%. I've had to use Microsoft from time to time, but for my purposes it's a toy compared to FreeBSD. It would take me several times as long to get things done if I had to use Microsoft. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 16:32:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B61437B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (external.osdn.org.ua [212.40.34.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF58343EB3 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:32:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAN0W2TP061953; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:32:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAN0Vxvm061952; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:31:59 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:31:59 +0200 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Johnson David Cc: Jamie Jones , advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Message-ID: <20021123003158.GA57146@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <200211221037.11131.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211221037.11131.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Johnson David! On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:37:11AM -0800, you wrote: > > You were doing well up until then. > > For some it may not be suitable, but I'm currently sitting here with over > > 50 windows open on a FreeBSD X desktop, and its stable, and fast. > > I second that sentiment. I have FreeBSD at work and at home. Monday I had to > boot into Win2K at work for ten minutes to schedule a meeting via Outlook > Calendar. The rest of the week has been FreeBSD (and Solaris) only. Yesterday > at home I booted into Windows to watch the LOTR:TT trailer on Quicktime. The > rest of the week has been on FreeBSD. You can watch QT movies on FreeBSD using wine, it works just great. :) -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 16:35:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0458737B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (mailhost1.bishopston.net [24.87.68.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3235243E6E for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:35:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.com) X-Envelope-From: Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gAN0Z1BO044721; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:35:02 GMT (envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id gAN0Z1Qh044673; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:35:01 GMT (envelope-from jamie) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:35:01 GMT From: Jamie Jones Message-Id: <200211230035.gAN0Z1Qh044673@catflap.bishopston.net> To: DavidJohnson@Siemens.com, never@nevermind.kiev.ua Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, jamie@dyslexicfish.com In-Reply-To: <20021123003158.GA57146@nevermind.kiev.ua> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > You can watch QT movies on FreeBSD using wine, it works just great. :) I thought "mplayer" worked natively with QT files.. Is this not so ? Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 16:44:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD7437B40B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:44:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (external.osdn.org.ua [212.40.34.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C04143EA3 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:44:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAN0iQTP062249; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:44:27 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAN0iQSj062248; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:44:26 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:44:25 +0200 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Jamie Jones Cc: DavidJohnson@Siemens.com, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Message-ID: <20021123004425.GA61965@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20021123003158.GA57146@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200211230035.gAN0Z1Qh044673@catflap.bishopston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211230035.gAN0Z1Qh044673@catflap.bishopston.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, Jamie Jones! On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:35:01AM +0000, you wrote: > > You can watch QT movies on FreeBSD using wine, it works just great. :) > > I thought "mplayer" worked natively with QT files.. Is this not so ? It doesn't play Sorenson-encoded videos, AFAIR. -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 17: 5:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0487C37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from thor.acuson.com (thor.acuson.com [157.226.71.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0E243E91 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:05:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DavidJohnson@Siemens.com) Received: from mvaexch02.acuson.com (mvaexch02.acuson.com [157.226.230.209]) by thor.acuson.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0H60003N48C8L7@thor.acuson.com> for advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:04:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by mvaexch02.acuson.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:00:29 -0800 Received: from balderdash.acuson.com (dhcp-46-188.acuson.com [157.226.46.188]) by mvaexch01.acuson.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id V00LPA6Z; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:02:34 -0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:04:54 -0800 From: Johnson David Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail In-reply-to: <20021123003158.GA57146@nevermind.kiev.ua> To: Alexandr Kovalenko Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <200211221704.54665.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Organization: Siemens Medical Systems MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <200211221037.11131.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> <20021123003158.GA57146@nevermind.kiev.ua> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 22 November 2002 04:31 pm, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > I second that sentiment. I have FreeBSD at work and at home. Monday I had > > to boot into Win2K at work for ten minutes to schedule a meeting via > > Outlook Calendar. The rest of the week has been FreeBSD (and Solaris) > > only. Yesterday at home I booted into Windows to watch the LOTR:TT > > trailer on Quicktime. The rest of the week has been on FreeBSD. > > You can watch QT movies on FreeBSD using wine, it works just great. :) How?!? Everytime I've tried to use it I get an error about a bad installation (or something to that effect). This occurs using the Windows install, and a native FreeBSD install using WINE. I assume this is due to the registry. Does the local WINE registry need certain permissions? Can I copy over the Windows registry? Yada, yada, yada. It's not that big of a deal to me, or I would have asked someone more knowledgable before now. But this might be a good mini-article to write up for advocacy: how to run that fussy Windows programs under FreeBSD. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 18:21:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C9037B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:21:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7E943EB7 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:21:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN2L4980598 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:21:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:21:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg writes: > Agreed 100%. I've had to use Microsoft from > time to time, but for my purposes it's a toy > compared to FreeBSD. It would take me several > times as long to get things done if I had to > use Microsoft. I'd hardly expect to hear anything different on a FreeBSD advocacy list. There are lots of people at Microsoft who say _exactly_ the same thing about UNIX as a server ("it would take me several times as long to get things done if I had to use UNIX" or "UNIX is a toy compared to Windows 2000"). Part of rational advocacy is recognizing the strengths AND the weaknesses of one's favored OS. UNIX is a usually a poor choice for the desktop, and Windows is often a poor choice for a server. It's important for objective parties to remain wary of anyone who claims that a single operating system can do everything better than any other OS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 18:36:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5664937B404 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:36:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F260F43EB2 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:36:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b192.otenet.gr [212.205.244.200]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAN2aPU6027545; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:36:26 +0200 (EET) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAN2aPA5002877; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:36:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAN2aO0d002876; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:36:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:36:24 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2002-11-23 03:21, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Greg writes: > > Agreed 100%. I've had to use Microsoft from > > time to time, but for my purposes it's a toy > > compared to FreeBSD. It would take me several > > times as long to get things done if I had to > > use Microsoft. The contortions through which you had to go to quote the above text (and then manually rewrap it to such a short line width), are really not necesary when you use better tools than Outlook Express for mail. I'm writing this reply using Emacs, which wraps and refills the paragraphs as I type, to the width that I have configured it to do. I still don't know of a way that Outlook Express can be forced to wrap text *and* display it correctly in line shorted than 70 columns. This probably seem irrelevant at first, but if you read it in context of what Greg has pointed out above, you'll notice that a point is made. Doing exactly the same thing (write a page of text with lines shorter than 70 characters) is a ton of work in Outlook, and a pair of keypresses away in a Unix tool. > Part of rational advocacy is recognizing the strengths AND the > weaknesses of one's favored OS. UNIX is a usually a poor choice for > the desktop, and Windows is often a poor choice for a server. You are not following your own suggestion. Why are you presenting only the weaknesses (or at least, a rough outline of the weaknesses) of these two environments and never mention any of their strengths? > It's important for objective parties to remain wary of anyone who > claims that a single operating system can do everything better than > any other OS. Then one that needs to compare Windows to UNIX would have to do a comparison of a great number of operating systems. "Windows" is a family of operating systems, and UNIX is an even greater family. Are you suggesting that you know everything about all of them when you are implying that Unix is not good as a desktopo and Windows is not good as a server? :P To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 18:51:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E0437B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:51:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D2443E9C for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:51:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN2pC980859 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:51:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <017a01c2929b$2ff2c260$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:51:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Giorgos writes: > The contortions through which you had to go > to quote the above text (and then manually > rewrap it to such a short line width), are really > not necesary when you use better tools than > Outlook Express for mail. I don't see how that it relevant to the discussion. > This probably seem irrelevant at first ... Yes, see above. > ... but if you read it in context of what Greg > has pointed out above, you'll notice that a > point is made. No point is made, except that you have a personal preference for some e-mail program other than Outlook Express. There are thousands of e-mail programs available, so you have your choice. I still don't see the connection to the discussion at hand, however. > Doing exactly the same thing (write a page of text > with lines shorter than 70 characters) is a ton of > work in Outlook, and a pair of keypresses away in > a Unix tool. E-mail is composed and sent with e-mail client programs, not operating systems. > You are not following your own suggestion. Why > are you presenting only the weaknesses (or at > least, a rough outline of the weaknesses) of these > two environments and never mention any of their > strengths? Perhaps you haven't read all of my posts. I've consistently praised UNIX where its strengths reside, namely, as a server. > Then one that needs to compare Windows to UNIX > would have to do a comparison of a great number > of operating systems. It would be a good idea, if practical. > Are you suggesting that you know everything about > all of them when you are implying that Unix is not > good as a desktopo and Windows is not good > as a server? No, I'm _stating_ that I have no emotional investment in the use of any operating system, and I simply use the best OS for the job. On my three computers, I run Windows NT, Windows XP Home Edition, and FreeBSD UNIX. The XP machine is purely a destkop. The NT machine is much more a desktop than a server, although I have a few services running on it as well. The UNIX machine is exclusively a server. My router appears to run a stripped version of UNIX--or something UNIX-like--as well, but I'm not exactly sure what it is. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 19: 2:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCF037B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (mailhost1.bishopston.net [24.87.68.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E35843E3B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:02:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.com) X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gAN32XBO088899; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:02:33 GMT (envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id gAN32XJf088882; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:02:33 GMT (envelope-from jamie) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:02:33 GMT From: Jamie Jones Message-Id: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> To: anthony@freebie.atkielski.com, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) In-Reply-To: <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'd hardly expect to hear anything different on a FreeBSD advocacy list. > There are lots of people at Microsoft who say _exactly_ the same thing about > UNIX as a server ("it would take me several times as long to get things done > if I had to use UNIX" or "UNIX is a toy compared to Windows 2000"). That doesn't necesarrily necesarily make the comments any less valid. "people at microsoft" are paid to work there. "people on freebsd-advocacy" are there because of their experience with FreeBSD > Part of rational advocacy is recognizing the strengths AND the weaknesses of > one's favored OS. Yes, of course. And, I didn't say that FreeBSD on the desktop is for everyone. I know some people who I'd never recommend anything other than windows at the moment (people who tweak with downloading some stuff but have no real technical knowledge) Also, people like my dad who know EVEN LESS I recommend FreeBSD - that I set up - he gets his email, reads web sites, and doesn't keep accidently deleting icons and screwing things up, requiring my help, like he did with win98 ! > UNIX is a usually a poor choice for the desktop, and > Windows is often a poor choice for a server. It's important for objective > parties to remain wary of anyone who claims that a single operating system > can do everything better than any other OS. But in the post I responded to, you didn't use "usually" - and whilst I may still debate "usually", it's not as cut and dry as when you wrote: | Conversely, though, converting from Windows to UNIX on the desktop is just | as absurd as doing the opposite on the server, and the fact that many people Such an extreme statement is not "rational advocacy" in my opinion. Cheers, Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 19:22:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FB137B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pop.freedomvoice.com (pop.freedomvoice.com [65.244.199.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ABD43EB3 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:22:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgowdy@cox.net) Received: (qmail 66206 invoked by uid 0); 23 Nov 2002 03:22:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cptnhosedonkey) (jeremiah@68.7.36.2) by pop.freedomvoice.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2002 03:22:04 -0000 Message-ID: <001101c2929f$8c50dc00$0200a8c0@cptnhosedonkey> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:22:26 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG /pokes head in for a second. "What's going on? Oh, FreeBSD-as-a-desktop debate with anti-Microsoft generalizations?" "Lemme know when we're back on the subject of promoting FreeBSD" /goes back to sleep To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 19:39:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD45637B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:39:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1627F43EB2 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:39:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN3dZ983473 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:39:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:39:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jamie writes: > That doesn't necesarrily necesarily make the > comments any less valid. It doesn't make them more valid, either. In fact, comments like that are usually devoid of any real validity, and reflect only personal preferences. > "people at microsoft" are paid to work there. > "people on freebsd-advocacy" are there because > of their experience with FreeBSD Same thing. Both groups have a bias, with rare exceptions. > But in the post I responded to, you didn't > use "usually" ... Since absolute statements are the exception rather than the rule (and I normally qualify them as such when making them, personally), "usually" can be assumed. > Such an extreme statement is not "rational > advocacy" in my opinion. It's not extreme at all. What is extreme is tossing out or avoiding working solutions in order to yield to an emotional attachment to some piece of software. I see it all the time, with people trying to do unreasonable things with Windows, UNIX, or the Mac (or any number of other software products). It's surprising how attached people become to their favorite software or even their favorite vendors; eventually they are willing to do anything to get their preferred software to work, no matter how ill-suited it might be to their purposes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 19:52:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E4537B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AF143E88 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:52:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN3qK983573 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:52:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:52:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Giorgos writes: > The "ease of use" part of working with a system > is very relevant. I don't see a problem with ease of use. > There aren't really thousands, but I was trying > to illustrate with an example what I consider > "difficult about working with Windows". You're entitled to express your opinion, but it may not be representative of a general rule. > Ah, but you will almost certainly agree that > it's not the "operating system" that users are > faced with, but its applications. Yes. > When those applications are not fit for the > purpose they were written or are incomplete, > flawed or buggy in the way they work, problems > do arise. Yes. However, the choice of an operating system is often a function of the _average_ functionality, reliability, security, etc., of the applications it runs. If most of the applications are buggy or weird, the OS may be excluded from consideration; conversely, if the applications are smoothly efficient and reliable, the OS may be given more consideration than it would merit on its own features alone. Additionally, the _number_ of choices for applications is a huge factor in choosing an OS. The more applications that are available (and the more choices there are for a given type of application), the more the OS is favored. After you get past these considerations, the final consideration is usually the technical merit of the OS itself. Windows wins on all three counts for the desktop. UNIX wins on all three counts for servers. I'm not sure that the Mac wins on any of these counts for general use, which might explain why it is very much a niche operating system. > Not really. I haven't seen any arguments posted > to back this claim :-/ Therefore they must not exist? > Sounds like tons of fun :) I don't run these computers for fun. I run them to get work done. I exhausted the novelty of playing with computers for their own sake many years ago, and now I consider them tools, as 99.9% of the human race does. I usually only deal with them for their own sake if I'm paid for it. > Windows is not bad or evil or inadequate for > fulfilling the purpose of a desktop machine. > It just isn't fit for me, and the style of work > that I have acquired after long years of being > a UNIX user. I already know that. However, your experience is not representative of the mainstream. Most people using computers have never even heard of UNIX, so they have no experience with it to color their preferences. > All that, of course, if one puts aside the > licensing and cost issues of Windows (which are > irrelevant to the suitability of Windows for a > desktop), are major factors in my deciding not > to use them on my desktop machines. Licensing and cost are not irrelevant in the big picture, although they are external to technical considerations. The cost of licensing Windows operating systems, in fact, has been a significant factor in the choice of UNIX (and FreeBSD) for many organizations. If you can run a server with an OS that is at least equivalent and usually superior to Windows, and you can do it for free, that's a _very_ strong point in favor of that OS. Even for individuals it may be a factor, if the budget is tight. That's why I run Windows XP Home Edition on one of my machines--it came with the machine, and the upgrade to XP Pro is too expensive for my purposes, and seems to add virtually nothing to my environment. FreeBSD cost me $10 (for the Wind River CD). FreeBSD represents _by far_ the best value for the money. It's unfortunate that it cannot replace Windows on the desktop, as I'm not keen on being so dependent on one vendor. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 20: 7:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2CA37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (mailhost1.bishopston.net [24.87.68.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9D243EB2 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:07:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.com) X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-To: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from catflap.bishopston.net (jamie@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gAN47OBO028039; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:07:24 GMT (envelope-from jamie@catflap.bishopston.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by catflap.bishopston.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id gAN47Orr028025; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:07:24 GMT (envelope-from jamie) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 04:07:24 GMT From: Jamie Jones Message-Id: <200211230407.gAN47Orr028025@catflap.bishopston.net> To: anthony@freebie.atkielski.com, freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) In-Reply-To: <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Since absolute statements are the exception rather than the rule (and I > normally qualify them as such when making them, personally), "usually" can > be assumed. Errrm Ok. > It's not extreme at all. What is extreme is tossing out or avoiding working > solutions in order to yield to an emotional attachment to some piece of > software. I see it all the time, with people trying to do unreasonable > things with Windows, UNIX, or the Mac (or any number of other software As with most of your original post, I don't disagree with this statement. But now it's gone 4.00am, this is turning into a religious war now, and anyway you'll find that I'm not the zeolot you may perceive me as ! My point was simply that it's not "absurd" to use FreeBSD on the desktop. It's certainly the best choice for me and a number of others, if not for the populace, but that's another argument altogether.. That's really the only thing I wanted to pick up on. Cheers, Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 20: 9:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8299D37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:09:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailsrv.otenet.gr (mailsrv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0F43E4A for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:09:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-b192.otenet.gr [212.205.244.200]) by mailsrv.otenet.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAN49QU6004145; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:09:27 +0200 (EET) Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gAN49QA5035584; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:09:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAN49Pp2035583; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:09:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:09:25 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2002-11-23 04:52, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Giorgos writes: > > The "ease of use" part of working with a system > > is very relevant. > > I don't see a problem with ease of use. Anthony. This is not related to FreeBSD advocacy anymore. You (or the programs you're using, I'm not personally attacking you here) also seem unable to distinguish between personal replies and list replies. What you quote above and in the rest of that post was part of a personal reply I wrote to a personal reply from you to one of my posts on the list. Taking the discussion off-list and bringing back to the lists parts of it is both confusing and unfair for the rest of the people of the list. Even more so, when the discussion isn't even about a topic that the list might get somethinng beneficial out of. I'm not going to take part in any of this. Thanks for your comments so far. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 20:16:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8F537B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C1843E9C for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:16:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN4Gk983785 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 05:16:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 05:16:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Giorgos writes: > Taking the discussion off-list and bringing > back to the lists parts of it is both confusing > and unfair for the rest of the people of the list. So is having a list with no proper Reply-To header in messages, making it impossible to reply to the list without changing the recipient name for each and every reply by hand. I don't understand the logic behind that. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 21: 0:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6F837B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pilchuck.reedmedia.net (pilchuck.reedmedia.net [209.166.74.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD3943EAA for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:00:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reed@reedmedia.net) Received: from reed by pilchuck.reedmedia.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18FSPH-0005vd-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:00:39 -0800 Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:00:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" To: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) In-Reply-To: <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So is having a list with no proper Reply-To header in messages, making it > impossible to reply to the list without changing the recipient name for each > and every reply by hand. I don't understand the logic behind that. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:16:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B9B37B404 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:16:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1488443E88 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:16:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FTaN-0001Pp-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:16:12 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF1C37.801087D6@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:12:07 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Greg writes: > > Agreed 100%. I've had to use Microsoft from > > time to time, but for my purposes it's a toy > > compared to FreeBSD. It would take me several > > times as long to get things done if I had to > > use Microsoft. > > I'd hardly expect to hear anything different on a FreeBSD advocacy list. > There are lots of people at Microsoft who say _exactly_ the same thing about > UNIX as a server ("it would take me several times as long to get things done > if I had to use UNIX" or "UNIX is a toy compared to Windows 2000"). Yeah, but Microsoft signs their paycheck, so they're hardly unbiased sources. No one on this list is being paid by "FreeBSD, Inc.". -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:28:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B2137B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:28:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF7843E91 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:28:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN6Sb984824 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:28:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01be01c292b9$8f288e40$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:28:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jeremy writes: > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 Nope, it's not that. The relevant headers look like this on messages resent to FreeBSD distribution lists: --- Return-Path: Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id gAN51x984132 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:02:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) [...] From: "Jeremy C. Reed" [...] Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG --- Under RFC 2822 (3.6.2), which obsoletes RFC 822, replies are sent as follows: "The originator fields also provide the information required when replying to a message. When the 'Reply-To:' field is present, it indicates the mailbox(es) to which the author of the message suggests that replies be sent. In the absence of the 'Reply-To:' field, replies SHOULD by default be sent to the mailbox(es) specified in the 'From:' field unless otherwise specified by the person composing the reply. In the case of FreeBSD list messages, the "From:" field points to the person who posted to the list, not to the list itself. Replying to the person who posted, then, is correct behavior for the mail agent. The headers should contain a "Reply-To:" header pointing to the list. Majordomo is capable of doing this, so somebody has turned it off for the FreeBSD lists, for reasons unknown. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:29:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EE537B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:29:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B78343E91 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:29:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN6Tm984838 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:29:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01c101c292b9$b8a129d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF1C37.801087D6@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:29:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Yeah, but Microsoft signs their paycheck, so > they're hardly unbiased sources. The strongest sources of bias have nothing to do with paychecks. Most adherents of the world's major religions, for example, receive no pay in exchange for their adherence to those religions, but their beliefs and bias remain very strong, just the same. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:32:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F3C37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:32:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A6543E88 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:32:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN6WL984862 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:32:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01c801c292ba$13c22c60$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021116232242.S23359-100000@hub.org> <04f801c28e20$0a3665b0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <10525754683.20021123004206@dds.nl> <014901c29297$74dc8040$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF1CEF.B800AC55@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:32:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Both of which take you away from the configuration > of the system as it is shipped from the vendor. Just changing the name of the server does that. > If you have to do a heck of a lot of work, that > kind of makes it a dubious benefit to have the > OS preinstalled on the hardware, which is the main > argument in favor of Windows. Server operating systems are not usually preinstalled; and security is usually easy to obtain for client operating systems, since it is normally sufficient to block most types of incoming traffic. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:37:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236F037B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:37:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pop.freedomvoice.com (pop.freedomvoice.com [65.244.199.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8A143E9C for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:37:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremiah@sherline.com) Received: (qmail 75012 invoked by uid 0); 23 Nov 2002 06:36:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cptnhosedonkey) (jeremiah@68.7.36.2) by pop.freedomvoice.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2002 06:36:57 -0000 Message-ID: <000f01c292ba$c58f9950$0200a8c0@cptnhosedonkey> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Terry Lambert" , "Anthony Atkielski" Cc: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF1C37.801087D6@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:37:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Yeah, but Microsoft signs their paycheck, so they're hardly > unbiased sources. > > No one on this list is being paid by "FreeBSD, Inc.". Geez, Terry, you mean to say they don't have you on the payroll yet? I got a huge bonus last month. You need to talk to HR about those missing paychecks before they move your desk to the basement and take your red Swingline stapler. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:45: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF62237B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:45:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9965C43E4A for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:45:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FU2A-0005vY-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:44:54 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF2306.FBDB6E38@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:41:10 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Jamie writes: > > "people at microsoft" are paid to work there. > > "people on freebsd-advocacy" are there because > > of their experience with FreeBSD > > Same thing. Both groups have a bias, with rare exceptions. The first is biased because of avarice; the second, because of altruism. That's not "the same thing" at all. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 22:58:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC8F37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:58:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2C043E3B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:58:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN6wq985088 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:58:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01d301c292bd$c8897100$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2306.FBDB6E38@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:58:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > The first is biased because of avarice; the > second, because of altruism. So you agree that they are both biased. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 23:15:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AC537B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCC043E3B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:15:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FUVu-00067c-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:15:38 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:11:14 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Giorgos writes: > > Taking the discussion off-list and bringing > > back to the lists parts of it is both confusing > > and unfair for the rest of the people of the list. > > So is having a list with no proper Reply-To header in messages, making it > impossible to reply to the list without changing the recipient name for each > and every reply by hand. I don't understand the logic behind that. Then you should read section 3.5 of RFC-2076 and section 3.6.2 of RFC-2822, so you can be enlightened. See also all of the Draft RFC draft-meyer-reqbehaviors-manager, which mandates that end-to-end fields not be modified, and specifically prohibits their insertion by mailing list server software. Frankly, your headers indicate that your MUA is Outlook Express version 6.00.2720.3000. In that MUA, there is an icon bar in the message viewing window, ans the second and third buttons from the left are "Reply" and "Reply All", respectively. In addition, if you were in the message crowsing window, which displays the "Subject:" lines and other information about messages, you can use the right mouse button to get a menu, where the third menu item is "Reply to Sender" , and the fourth is "Reply to All". Finally, the fifth entry in the program menu bar is "Message", and the thirs and fourth items are identical to those in the right-button menu previously discussed. Actually, you had to go a fair distance out of your way to send a private message to a mailing list, since you had to manually add an address. The manual addressing of a message that you are claiming, being unnecessary (despite your claim to the contrary) because of the seperation of reply options. -- Terry -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 23:16:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFCD37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3187943E88 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:16:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 48D825190A; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:45:34 +1030 (CST) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:45:34 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [reformatted to a standard line length] On Saturday, 23 November 2002 at 3:21:04 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Greg writes: > >> Agreed 100%. I've had to use Microsoft from time to time, but for >> my purposes it's a toy compared to FreeBSD. It would take me >> several times as long to get things done if I had to use Microsoft. > > I'd hardly expect to hear anything different on a FreeBSD advocacy > list. You don't read your own messages? > There are lots of people at Microsoft who say _exactly_ the same > thing about UNIX as a server ("it would take me several times as > long to get things done if I had to use UNIX" or "UNIX is a toy > compared to Windows 2000"). We were talking about desktops. > Part of rational advocacy is recognizing the strengths AND the > weaknesses of one's favored OS. Or others. But yes, agreed. > UNIX is a usually a poor choice for the desktop, and Windows is > often a poor choice for a server. It's important for objective > parties to remain wary of anyone who claims that a single operating > system can do everything better than any other OS. I think you've either misunderstood or misrepresented me. Since I've (rather unwisely) come back into this discussion, I'd like to make a few points: 1. I am most definitely not a fanatic user of FreeBSD. I've used many operating systems in my time, including Microsoft. 2. You seem to have overlooked the "for my purposes" in the message you replied to. 3. There's a tradeoff between "ease of learning" and "ease of use". It's quite possible that Microsoft is easier for beginners, though I'm getting the feeling lately that it has become much more complicated. When I was forced to use Microsoft, I was continually calling the help desk, because I couldn't understand how to do things. The reason for this is that "intuitive" is very subjective. If you've used Microsoft all the time, you'll get the idea of the look and feel. If, like me, you've never used "Windows" in anger, you'll find it completely bizarre. OK, so you can say "yes, but it's easy when you know it". You can say that about FreeBSD as well. I don't believe it's true with Microsoft. The reasons have less to do with Microsoft itself than with the user interface; that's why I think things like OpenOffice are the wrong thing to do. A couple of examples (as I say, for my purposes): 1. I get about 1500 mail messages a day. They're usually in threads, like this one. It's possible that Outlook can arrange things hierarchically, but I haven't been able to find out how to do it. mutt does this out of the box. I can delete whole threads with a single keystroke. I won't even get started on the contortions you need to get Outlook not to break correct text. 2. I suppose it's possible to use Microsoft without the mouse, but I'd guess it's not easy. Every mouse click takes as long at 20 keystrokes, so using the mouse is inefficient where a keystroke can do the same thing. In addition, the screen on which I'm writing this has a resolution of 2048x1536. The window into which I'm typing right now has a size of 110x110 characters, which enables me to see the entire message on a single screen. Just positioning the mouse on the correct place is quite difficult. That's not to say that mice are bad; I use one all the time, but for things where mice are better. Microsoft overdoes it. 3. I recently watched somebody prepare some slides for a presentation with OpenOffice. He had to make a large number of tradeoffs in order to get what he wanted. There seems to be no way to automate things. By contrast, I make my slides with groff, and I have a complete programming language behind it to help me do exactly what I want. I suppose I make some tradeoffs too, since I don't have all these silly themes (or whatever they're called) which things like PowerPoint offer. But that's OK by me. Too often, Microsoft comes across like a child's toy: brightly coloured and weak on functionality. IMO the real reason why Microsoft is still used so much is because computer users are (still) mainly newbies. When it becomes important for them to be able to use computers effectively, more and more of them will move on to something more powerful. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 23:24:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0B437B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB0A43E9C for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:24:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FUeh-00047i-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:24:43 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF2C27.759E7D7@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:20:07 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremiah Gowdy Cc: Anthony Atkielski , FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF1C37.801087D6@mindspring.com> <000f01c292ba$c58f9950$0200a8c0@cptnhosedonkey> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: > > Yeah, but Microsoft signs their paycheck, so they're hardly > > unbiased sources. > > > > No one on this list is being paid by "FreeBSD, Inc.". > > Geez, Terry, you mean to say they don't have you on the payroll yet? I got > a huge bonus last month. > > You need to talk to HR about those missing paychecks before they move your > desk to the basement and take your red Swingline stapler. Not a problem, since they fired Bill... plus there's a new printer... ;^). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 23:26:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C485D37B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:26:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFE943E4A for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:26:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FUgX-0005KB-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:26:37 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF2C97.D6DFAD4B@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:21:59 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2306.FBDB6E38@mindspring.com> <01d301c292bd$c8897100$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > The first is biased because of avarice; the > > second, because of altruism. > > So you agree that they are both biased. No, I disagree that they are the same thing. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 0: 4: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF1A37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:04:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238FE43E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:04:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN841985594 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:04:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:04:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Then you should read section 3.5 of RFC-2076 > and section 3.6.2 of RFC-2822, so you can be > enlightened. RFC-2076 is documentation, not prescriptive; in any case, section 3.5 does not conflict with my observations. I've already cited section 3.6.2 of RFC-2822, which is the standard upon which I based my observations. > See also all of the Draft RFC draft-meyer= > reqbehaviors-manager, which mandates that > end-to-end fields not be modified ... That draft no longer exists, and did not become a RFC. > Frankly, your headers indicate that your MUA > is Outlook Express version 6.00.2720.3000. In > that MUA, there is an icon bar in the message > viewing window, ans the second and third buttons > from the left are "Reply" and "Reply All", > respectively. But there is no button for "reply to a mailing list that isn't identified anywhere in the headers." > ... where the third menu item is "Reply to > Sender" , and the fourth is "Reply to All". The sender is the list owner, not the list itself. A reply to all still requires that I delete the sender; it saves no effort as compared with simply typing the list name over the sender's name. (Many posters here are lazy and leave the original sender's address in the To: field, but I don't like to receive two copies of everything, and I presume others don't like that, either.) > Actually, you had to go a fair distance out > of your way to send a private message to a > mailing list, since you had to manually > add an address. No, I simply performed my usual operation of typing the mailing list address in the To: field. I have to do that for every reply to these lists. It required no additional effort beyond what I usually expend to reply to the list. However, I didn't deliberately send a private message to the list. I'm just so used to replacing that field for every single reply to the list that I do it automatically. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 0:12:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB60F37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:12:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6437443E9C for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:12:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN8Cj985666 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:12:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:12:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg writes: > You don't read your own messages? I'm an exception to the rule. > We were talking about desktops. We were also talking about bias. > I think you've either misunderstood or > misrepresented me. I don't recall addressing you specifically at all. > It's quite possible that Microsoft is easier > for beginners, though I'm getting the feeling > lately that it has become much more complicated. Actually, Windows XP is vastly simpler to use for most users, as compared with its predecessors. It's one of the most frequent comments I hear about the OS. > In addition, the screen on which I'm writing > this has a resolution of 2048x1536. What type of monitor is it, and how large is it, and what aspect ratio does the monitor have? > Just positioning the mouse on the correct > place is quite difficult. A graphics tablet can solve this problem in many cases. In any case, the problems you describe are common to all GUIs. And Microsoft software generally does have keyboard equivalents for everything, although they aren't very well documented. > By contrast, I make my slides with groff, and > I have a complete programming language behind > it to help me do exactly what I want. By contrast, I make my slides with Quark XPress, and I've never seen any need for any programming language when preparing documents. > Too often, Microsoft comes across like a child's > toy: brightly coloured and weak on functionality. That's what the market wants. > IMO the real reason why Microsoft is still used > so much is becausecomputer users are (still) mainly > newbies. When it becomes important for them to be > able to use computers effectively, more and more of > them will move on to something more powerful. No. The real reason why Microsoft is still used (or at least one of the reasons) is that most people couldn't care less about computers; they just want to get their work done. They do not share your interest in computers for the sake of computers, and thus do not want anything "more powerful," and do not care about using computers "more effectively." They have lives outside of computerland, and so they only use the computer long enough to finish some straightforward task, and then they go on to other things. Since this is not likely to change, neither is the dominance of software such as that produced by Microsoft likely to change, at least on the desktop. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 0:14: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16F837B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:14:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8492243E88 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:14:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN8E2985682 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:14:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <01ee01c292c8$48738540$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2306.FBDB6E38@mindspring.com> <01d301c292bd$c8897100$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2C97.D6DFAD4B@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:14:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > No, I disagree that they are the same thing. You agree that they were both biased. The "thing" in my original post was the condition of being biased. And yet you disagree that they are the same thing (= being biased). Hmm. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 0:24:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92CF37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5E8543E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:24:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 10477 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Nov 2002 08:22:18 -0000 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:22:18 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3?= Pasternak To: Alexandr Kovalenko Cc: Jamie Jones , DavidJohnson@Siemens.com, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TheRegister article on Hotmail Message-ID: <20021123082218.GC10263@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Reply-To: Michal Pasternak References: <20021123003158.GA57146@nevermind.kiev.ua> <200211230035.gAN0Z1Qh044673@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021123004425.GA61965@nevermind.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20021123004425.GA61965@nevermind.kiev.ua> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexandr Kovalenko [Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:44:25AM +0200]: > Hello, Jamie Jones! > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 12:35:01AM +0000, you wrote: > > > > You can watch QT movies on FreeBSD using wine, it works just great. :) > > > > I thought "mplayer" worked natively with QT files.. Is this not so ? > > It doesn't play Sorenson-encoded videos, AFAIR. Update your information then :) From the mplayer.hq.hu: How To Enable QuickTime Codecs In MPlayer - 2002.11.19. A'rpi whipped up a small text which describes how to use closed-source QuickTime codecs (Sorenson, QDesign Audio, etc) in MPlayer. The process is a bit difficult, but currently the only solution. Be patient, we are working on a better implementation. It is important to emphasize the fact that although this method includes usage of the windows emulator Wine, this is NOT just like using the QuickTime Player. Wine is only used for the decoder, thus from MPlayer's viewpoint it looks just like any other codec: you can use xmga, aalib, vidix, whatever to display the movie. And, you can even encode it with for example DivX, with MEncoder. The instructions can be found in DOCS/tech/qt-libwine-howto.txt. Good luck! --- I never tested it, BTW. -- Micha³ Pasternak - http://pasternak.w.lub.pl - +48606570000 www.anti-dmca.org, www.debian.org/devel/debian-med "Ufamy ¶wiatu, jak p±ki kwiatów, gdy jesieñ jeszcze trwa..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 0:27:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8989E37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:27:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B10043EAA for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:27:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id CE8185190A; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:57:10 +1030 (CST) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:57:10 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [artificially shortened lines *again* fixed] On Saturday, 23 November 2002 at 9:12:45 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Greg writes: >> I think you've either misunderstood or misrepresented me. > > I don't recall addressing you specifically at all. Go back and check your message, since you've removed the relevant part from this reply. >> Just positioning the mouse on the correct place is quite difficult. > > A graphics tablet can solve this problem in many cases. Possibly. But that's only one of the reasons, and you ignored the other. > In any case, the problems you describe are common to all GUIs. Agreed. As I went on to say, that's an objection. >> By contrast, I make my slides with groff, and I have a complete >> programming language behind it to help me do exactly what I want. > > By contrast, I make my slides with Quark XPress, and I've never seen > any need for any programming language when preparing documents. Well stated. Most Microsoft users "don't see a need" to do things better. That's amply demonstrated in email which is so badly laid out that you'd think people would be ashamed of it. >> Too often, Microsoft comes across like a child's toy: brightly >> coloured and weak on functionality. > > That's what the market wants. The market doesn't know what it wants. >> IMO the real reason why Microsoft is still used so much is >> becausecomputer users are (still) mainly newbies. When it becomes >> important for them to be able to use computers effectively, more >> and more of them will move on to something more powerful. > > No. The real reason why Microsoft is still used (or at least one of > the reasons) is that most people couldn't care less about computers; > they just want to get their work done. You're not listening, are you? > They do not share your interest in computers for the sake of > computers, and thus do not want anything "more powerful," and do not > care about using computers "more effectively." That's what getting your work done is all about. If I had to use Microsoft Outlook, I wouldn't even get through my mail: it would take me more than a working day to get through it. > They have lives outside of computerland, and so they only use the > computer long enough to finish some straightforward task, and then > they go on to other things. I'm not sure what relevance this statement has. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 0:40:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8522D37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570A843EA9 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 00:40:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAN8eh985889 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:40:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:40:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg writes: > Most Microsoft users "don't see a need" to do > things better. Perhaps, although Quark XPress is written by Quark, not Microsoft, and it is the standard of the industry. > That's amply demonstrated in email which is so > badly laid out that you'd think people would be > ashamed of it. Most people don't care. They are interested only in the content of e-mail, not in its formatting or in the conformance of its headers to any arbitrary standard. Only geeks care about the latter things, and geeks are an increasingly small minority of computer users. > The market doesn't know what it wants. More precisely, the market refuses to want what you think is best for it. > You're not listening, are you? I am listening, even though I've heard it all before. Most people dramatically overestimate the objective importance of things that interest them. Computer geeks thus dramatically overestimate the importance of just about any aspect of computers. People who are not computer geeks, however, do not care, and will consistently opt for whatever requires the smallest amount of thought on their part ... since they prefer to think about other things instead. > That's what getting your work done is all about. No, you can get work done with just about anything. It doesn't have to be ideal. And in fact, the time, effort, and money required to implement and use someone's notion of an "ideal" solution to getting work done is simply not justified for people who have other interests in life. Anything will do for them. > If I had to use Microsoft Outlook, I wouldn't even > get through my mail: it would take me more than a > working day to get through it. But lots of people use Microsoft Outlook or Microsoft Outlook Express and are entirely happy with it. They do not have your emotional investment in e-mail products. > I'm not sure what relevance this statement has. I'm trying to make clear that you have an extremely skewed perspective on the importance of many aspects of computer science in the real world--the world outside the geek community. Just as you lament ordinary computer users not using your idea of the perfect system, there are dentists lamenting the fact that you do not carefully brush and floss after every meal, and there are cardiologists lamenting the fact that you do not precisely weigh the quantities of saturated and unsaturated fats in every meal you consume. There are car mechanics who lament your failure to rotate your tires and change your oil according to a precise and optimal schedule. There are environmentalists who lament your failure to shut off your computer whenever you step away from your desk, and your failure to install optimal, maximally efficient insulation in your home to save energy. There are clergymen who lament your failure to pray for at least one hour daily in order to ensure your salvation in the afterlife. And so on. Do you see the point? What is important to you is not necessarily important to others. Microsoft and many other companies in many domains understand this, and design and market their products accordingly. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 1:19:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9777337B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:19:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B6843E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FWRS-00053A-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:19:10 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:08:18 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Frankly, your headers indicate that your MUA > > is Outlook Express version 6.00.2720.3000. In > > that MUA, there is an icon bar in the message > > viewing window, ans the second and third buttons > > from the left are "Reply" and "Reply All", > > respectively. > > But there is no button for "reply to a mailing list that isn't identified > anywhere in the headers." Of course not. It's a breach of ettiquite to do that. Only a jerk forwards a private email, or part of a private email, to a mailing list. That's what people were complining about you doing. > > ... where the third menu item is "Reply to > > Sender" , and the fourth is "Reply to All". > > The sender is the list owner, not the list itself. You're wrong. That's not how Outlook interprets "Reply to Sender"; it interprets it as "Reply to the address(es) in the `Reply-To:' header, if there is one, otherwise reply to the address in the `From:' header". If you need me to post the relevent portion of the Outlook Express version 6 Help file for you because you are unable to click on the "Help" button yourself, I can oblige you. > A reply to all still requires that I delete the sender; Why? So that if the sender is not a subscriber to the list, they don't se your response to their message? That's a foolish thing odo, unless it's your goal in life to see your email on mailing lists, rather than engaging in rational discourse. > it saves no effort as compared with simply typing the list name > over the sender's name. (Many posters here are lazy and leave > the original sender's address in the To: field, but I don't > like to receive two copies of everything, and I presume others > don't like that, either.) It is the job of the receiving system to perform duplicate suppression. If it's a site-wide option, this should be done on your mailing list server (or your ISP). If it's not (it usually is not, for a myriad of very good reasons), then it's the job of your mail client and your mail client's filters to deal with it. Personally, I like it: it lets me differentiate important messages (messages which are addressed to me directly in the "To:" or "Cc:") from relatively unimportant messages (messages addressed to a list to which I am subscribed). If it weren't for duplication, I would not be able to prioritze the mail I receive properly. > > Actually, you had to go a fair distance out > > of your way to send a private message to a > > mailing list, since you had to manually > > add an address. > > No, I simply performed my usual operation of typing the mailing list address > in the To: field. I have to do that for every reply to these lists. It > required no additional effort beyond what I usually expend to reply to the > list. Why do you have to do that? THe "To:" or "Cc:" field contains the list name. If you want that behaviour ("send only to list mail received from a mailing list"), then you should set "Sender:" as your highest or second-highest priority header for "Reply to Sender". I guess you need to spring for the full version of Outlook to do that: cost of using a feature-poor mail client. > However, I didn't deliberately send a private message to the list. I'm just > so used to replacing that field for every single reply to the list that I do > it automatically. You should probably point that out to the person whose private email you sent to the list, in case they are not a list subscriber and didn't see this message, and appologize. 8-|. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 1:29: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3539537B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA49F43E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:29:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FWax-0002VW-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:28:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:17:58 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Too often, Microsoft comes across like a child's > > toy: brightly coloured and weak on functionality. > > That's what the market wants. Given that Microsoft is a monopoly, how can you tell the difference between "what the market wants" and "what the market is forced to use by virtue of an illegal leveraging of monopoly powers"? Just because the primary focus of the Antitrust decision that recognized the Microsoft monopoly was their leveraging of their OS to force competing broswer vendors out of business doesn't mean that they haven't used that same leverage against vendors of other applications. Most Windows boxes come with Outlook Express [leveraging the monopoly to extinguish competing mail clients, such as ZMail] and Microsoft Word [leveraging the monopoly to extinguish competing word processors, such as Word Perfect] and Microsoft Peer-to-peer Networking [leveraging the monopoly to extinguish competing peer-to-peer networking, such as LANtastic] and Microsoft Client networking [leveraging the monopoly to extinguish competing client/server networking, such as Novell NetWare]. In all these cases, Microsoft has driven competitors out of business with "free" software, whise actual costs were borne by the 80% profit margin on Windows, which they could charge that much for, due to their OS monopoly. IMO, ZMail kicks Outlook's butt, but you are never going to see it any more, despite it's higher quality, not because it's not what the market wants, but because Outlook Express is illegally bundeled in the Windows pricing, instead of priced seperately. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 1:30:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0CC37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:30:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D1C43E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:30:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FWc8-0003AT-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:30:13 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF480C.21CE7349@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:19:08 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <200211230302.gAN32XJf088882@catflap.bishopston.net> <019201c292a1$f4ee67d0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2306.FBDB6E38@mindspring.com> <01d301c292bd$c8897100$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2C97.D6DFAD4B@mindspring.com> <01ee01c292c8$48738540$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > No, I disagree that they are the same thing. > > You agree that they were both biased. The "thing" in my original post was > the condition of being biased. And yet you disagree that they are the same > thing (= being biased). Hmm. Except "being biased" was not the part I was disagreeing with; I can quote you the context you removed from two messages back, if necesary. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 1:33:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B7A37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:33:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486AF43E88 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:33:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FWfb-000537-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:33:47 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF48DD.8A522A2A@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:22:37 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > If I had to use Microsoft Outlook, I wouldn't even > > get through my mail: it would take me more than a > > working day to get through it. > > But lots of people use Microsoft Outlook or Microsoft Outlook Express and > are entirely happy with it. They do not have your emotional investment in > e-mail products. Post their email addreses to BugTraq. They will quickly find themselves lss than entirely happy. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 2:10:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B677837B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:10:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258C543E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:10:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANAAl986637 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:10:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ¤æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹¤( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! ing.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:10:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > You're wrong. That's not how Outlook interprets > "Reply to Sender" ... I wasn't talking about Outlook; I was talking about the meanings of the headers in the message. > ... it interprets it as "Reply to the address(es) > in the `Reply-To:' header, if there is one, otherwise > reply to the address in the `From:' header". That's exactly what it should do. > If you need me to post the relevent portion of > the Outlook Express version 6 Help file for you > because you are unable to click on the > "Help" button yourself, I can oblige you. I don't use the help files, but thanks, anyway. > Why? Because the sender is one of the "all" to which the "Reply all" is sent. > So that if the sender is not a subscriber to > the list, they don't se your response to their > message? If they were not subscribers to the list, they would not have seen the message to which they are replying, and to which I am responding in turn. > It is the job of the receiving system to > perform duplicate suppression. I guess my FreeBSD UNIX receiving system doesn't do its job, then. > If it's not (it usually is not, for a myriad of > very good reasons), then it's the job of your > mail client and your mail client's filters to > deal with it. If I am separately addressed and addressed as part of a mailing list, I _expect_ to receive two copies of the message. The problem is with the sender specifying both me and the mailing list as recipients; I imagine many senders are using "Reply all" or its equivalent. > Why do you have to do that? THe "To:" or "Cc:" > field contains the list name. No, it contains the address of the sender of the post to which I'm replying. The headers do not specify a "Reply-To:" address, and the "From:" field is filled with the address of the person who posted the message. Thus, when I reply, the To: field is filled with the address of the poster, not the address of the list. The error is not in the mail client, it is in the mailing list software. > I guess you need to spring for the full version > of Outlook to do that: cost of using a feature-poor > mail client. I'm not aware of any "full version" of Outlook. In any case, I should not wish to change the priority of headers in determining how the reply address is obtained. The current behavior conforms to the RFCs, and that's fine with me. > You should probably point that out to the person > whose private email you sent to the list, in case > they are not a list subscriber and didn't see this > message, and appologize. This is a discussion forum, not an exchange of love letters. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 2:14:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBEA37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:14:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4C843E9C for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:14:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANAEW986665 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:14:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:14:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Given that Microsoft is a monopoly, how can > you tell the difference between "what the > market wants" and "what the market is forced > to use by virtue of an illegal leveraging > of monopoly powers"? I'm not interested in rabid bashing of Microsoft or any other vendor or product. Sorry. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 2:15:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A0F37B406 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:15:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B409943E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:15:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANAFg986683 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:15:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <022701c292d9$47aa5920$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF48DD.8A522A2A@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:15:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Post their email addreses to BugTraq. They > will quickly find themselves lss than entirely > happy. They control the distribution of their e-mail addresses, not I. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 2:52:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790BA37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net (flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC9A43E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:52:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FXu3-00049g-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:52:47 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF5AB4.E71E4E67@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:38:44 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ¤æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹¤( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! ing.com> <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Why? > > Because the sender is one of the "all" to which the "Reply all" is sent. Duplicate supression is a function of the receiver. > > So that if the sender is not a subscriber to > > the list, they don't se your response to their > > message? > > If they were not subscribers to the list, they would not have seen the > message to which they are replying, and to which I am responding in turn. Not true. A frequent use of mailing lists is to: 1) Have a problem. 2) Search list archives for a solution to the problem. 3) If a solution is found in the archives, STOP. 4) If there is no solution in the archives, but there are other people with the probem, contact them directly, and see how they solved it (if they did). 5) If the other people found a solution, and they share it with you, STOP (Note: subsequent people will repeat this process, until the people with the solution post it to the list to avoid being pestered). 6) Post a request for a fix to a mailing list *without necessarily subscribing to the list* 7) Receive an answer to the question, which is sent both to them directly, and o the list, for the purposes of being archived for future people with the problem. Note that in step 7, the respondant sends to the list and to the original sender, both, without the orignl sender being on the list. In the case of cross-posting, etc., it's possible to have a set of lists [A,B,C], and a set of users ith list membership a[A,B], b[A,C], c[B,C], all involved in the discussion, due to an initial cross-post. > > It is the job of the receiving system to > > perform duplicate suppression. > > I guess my FreeBSD UNIX receiving system doesn't do its job, then. I guess you haven't configured it correctly, then. If you are using POP3 against a FreeBSD mail server, then configure it to use procmail, and maintain a rolling archive of "Message-Id:" field contents, and suppress duplicate deliveries, on a per-user basis: # weed out duplicates :0 Whc: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 $PMDIR/msgid.cache :0 a: $DELETE See also: Procmail Mini-Tutorial by Tony Nugent http://www.sektorn.mooo.com/era/procmail/tony.html It's generally accepted that this is actually the job of the MUA (in this case, OutLook Express is failing to provide this feature for you, for whatever reason; most likely, it's an overabundance of the property "suck"). The reason for this is that suppression of duplicates prevents you from greating MUA filter rules that do proper archiving of messages and/or delivery into list archive and standard mailboxes, as a result of their method of arriving at the recipient (e.g. keying of the existance of a "Sender:" or a "List-ID:" or "List-Unsubscribe:" or other header). > > If it's not (it usually is not, for a myriad of > > very good reasons), then it's the job of your > > mail client and your mail client's filters to > > deal with it. > > If I am separately addressed and addressed as part of a mailing list, I > _expect_ to receive two copies of the message. The problem is with the > sender specifying both me and the mailing list as recipients; I imagine many > senders are using "Reply all" or its equivalent. Your problem. Not the sender's problem. You could argue that it's also a mailing list manager issue, since the mailing list manager could note that the "To:" or "Cc:" line contained an address which mtched that of a known list member for the message, and suppress delivery. However, this has two problems: 1) The same problem with non-archival delivery that should be handled on behalf of the user by the MUA; at a bare minimum, this would have to be a subscriber controllable option, since most sae people *do not want the behaviour you want*. 2) Doing this is computationally expensive, and the general rule in client/server software design is to push all the processing you possible can off onto the client, since clients outnumber servers by a wide margin, and the left-over 200MHz Pentium 2 box you are given to build a mail server with has far less balls than the 3GHz boxes sitting on the desks of the VP of sales, the VP of marketing, or the CEO's, CTO's, or even the technical writer's desk -- or even the 600MHz boxes they stick you with in engineering, because you don't "rate" a faster box, and since when is compiling the company's product as important as minimizing the browser containing porn, when someone walks into the sales manager's office? If you are going to this much trouble to hack the crap out of your list manager software, you'd be *much* better off addressing things like the ability to send email to a list *minus* specific people, and oher features that are requested a lot more than duplicate suppression at the server instead of at the client. > > Why do you have to do that? THe "To:" or "Cc:" > > field contains the list name. > > No, it contains the address of the sender of the post to which I'm replying. > The headers do not specify a "Reply-To:" address, and the "From:" field is > filled with the address of the person who posted the message. Thus, when I > reply, the To: field is filled with the address of the poster, not the > address of the list. The error is not in the mail client, it is in the > mailing list software. The error is in the use of temil client, who used "Reply to Sender" button, rather than t non-existant (because it's useless) "Reply to List" button, or the "Reply to All" button that they should have used, instead. > > I guess you need to spring for the full version > > of Outlook to do that: cost of using a feature-poor > > mail client. > > I'm not aware of any "full version" of Outlook. "Outlook", as oppoed to "Outlook Express". > In any case, I should not wish to change the priority of headers in > determining how the reply address is obtained. The current behavior > conforms to the RFCs, and that's fine with me. Then lump it, because so does the mailing list management software, and that's fine with everybody else. 8-). > > You should probably point that out to the person > > whose private email you sent to the list, in case > > they are not a list subscriber and didn't see this > > message, and appologize. > > This is a discussion forum, not an exchange of love letters. In other words, you are an unrepentant poster-of-private-email, rather than an accidental poster-of-prviate-email. Therefore the rest of us should consider that you will not honor a confidence, before sending you private email. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 2:53:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395E837B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net (flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54AE43EA9 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:53:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FXuo-0004YV-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:53:35 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:39:27 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > Given that Microsoft is a monopoly, how can > > you tell the difference between "what the > > market wants" and "what the market is forced > > to use by virtue of an illegal leveraging > > of monopoly powers"? > > I'm not interested in rabid bashing of Microsoft or any other vendor or > product. Sorry. Except UNIX in general, and FreeBSD in particular, it seems. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 2:55:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46C437B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net (flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C9EB43EAF for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:55:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by flamingo.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FXwx-0005kH-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:55:47 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF5B5C.C1BE4091@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 02:41:32 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF48DD.8A522A2A@mindspring.com> <022701c292d9$47aa5920$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > Post their email addreses to BugTraq. They > > will quickly find themselves lss than entirely > > happy. > > They control the distribution of their e-mail addresses, not I. Do they have signature lines that contain their email addresses? Given your track record of unrepentantly posting private email to mailing lists, it's sufficient for you to post one of their private emails to the mailing list over there, with commentary, just as you posted the private email to this list, with commentary, earlier, right? The effect will be the same as merely posting their email addresses. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 3:27:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB0337B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:27:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC8D43EAF for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:27:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANBRX987230 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:27:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <024301c292e3$51b6ef50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ?æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    ÇS lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ ing.com> <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5AB4.E71E4E67@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:27:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Duplicate supression is a function of the receiver. Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you require. Didn't Jon Postel say that once? > I guess you haven't configured it correctly, then. I guess I have better things to do than to configure it to conform to some other person's notion of what is "correct." > "Outlook", as oppoed to "Outlook Express". Two different products, despite the names. > Then lump it ... I do. > In other words, you are an unrepentant poster= > of-private-email, rather than an accidental > poster-of-prviate-email. No, I just don't have very high testosterone levels, so a desire to compete and conquer is lacking in my case, as is the tendency to endlessly bicker that such a desire often engenders. > Therefore the rest of us should consider that > you will not honor a confidence, before sending > you private email. The rest of you should assume that I do not want any private e-mail concerning this public discussion. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 3:28:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9C137B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:28:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F107E43EA9 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:28:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANBSt987245 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:28:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <024801c292e3$824f45e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:28:55 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Except UNIX in general, and FreeBSD in particular, > it seems. No, not even those. An unwillingness to mindlessly endorse FreeBSD or UNIX for every conceivable use under the sun is not synonymous with bashing; in fact, it isn't even close. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 3:30: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28F037B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24DA43E88 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:30:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANBU6987262 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:30:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <025101c292e3$ac6ea8c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF48DD.8A522A2A@mindspring.com> <022701c292d9$47aa5920$0a00000a@atkielski.com> 8^( ³(?æ¿¿}s( ³(H òÿÿÿÊ-y êO (øf (À| <3DDF5B5C.C1BE4091@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:30:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Do they have signature lines that contain > their email addresses? I don't remember. I don't usually read signature lines. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 3:41:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37B137B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:41:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA0B43EAF for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:41:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FYej-0006he-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:41:02 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF65A4.6F21D8D5@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:25:24 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ?æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    ÇS lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ ing.com> <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5AB4.E71E4E67@mindspring.com> <024301c292e3$51b6ef50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > Duplicate supression is a function of the receiver. > > Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you require. Didn't > Jon Postel say that once? Yes. Applies equally well to MUAs. > > I guess you haven't configured it correctly, then. > > I guess I have better things to do than to configure it to conform to some > other person's notion of what is "correct." Hey, you're the one complaining about the duplicates. If you don't want to run a proper MUA, and you want to correct it in your mail server, follow the instructions in the pervious post. Otherwise, quit your complaining, because no one is going to change all the MUA's, mail servers, and mailing list software in the world to be different than it is, just to make you not need to type in list addresses on intentional posts, to avoid "accidently" posting private email to mailing lists. > > "Outlook", as opposed to "Outlook Express". > > Two different products, despite the names. You're still not running the full version of "Outlook". > > Then lump it ... > > I do. And take responsibility when your defective coping mechanism results in private emails bein posted to a public mailing list, in whole or in part. > > In other words, you are an unrepentant poster= > > of-private-email, rather than an accidental > > poster-of-prviate-email. > > No, I just don't have very high testosterone levels, so a desire to compete > and conquer is lacking in my case, as is the tendency to endlessly bicker > that such a desire often engenders. No one asked you to "compete and conquer", only to appologize for something you claimed as a mistake, which hardly anyone actually believes was a mistake, but would be willing to treat it as such, as a polite fiction, were you to acknowledge that your error was in fact an error. > > Therefore the rest of us should consider that > > you will not honor a confidence, before sending > > you private email. > > The rest of you should assume that I do not want any private e-mail > concerning this public discussion. You should set your "Reply-To:"... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 3:54:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C84737B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:54:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A590143E88 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:54:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FYro-0005gt-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:54:32 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF68AF.E5F94C90@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:38:23 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> <024801c292e3$824f45e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > Except UNIX in general, and FreeBSD in particular, > > it seems. > > No, not even those. An unwillingness to mindlessly endorse FreeBSD or UNIX > for every conceivable use under the sun is not synonymous with bashing; in > fact, it isn't even close. Earlier you stated, in a post to the list, in response to a post by Greg Lehey (though you made this difficult to discern, by altering mail headers unnecesarily): Part of rational advocacy is recognizing the strengths AND the weaknesses of one's favored OS. What you neglected to state was: And then playing up the strengths, while playing down and/or providing workarounds for the weaknesses. You seem intolerant of the idea of "an advocate", as in "someone who advocates", as opposed to "somone who only advocates under specific conditions which Anthony decides upon". I don't understan the idea of a "conditional advocate"; it seems to me that this would be similar to someone who cheers for their favorite baseball team, except when they are playing teams from the West Coast, becuse they are supposed to realize that they should "bend over and take it like a man" when their team plays a West Coast team. Advocacy doesn't work like that: it's "all or nothing". A Cubs fan is a Cubs fan, and comes out and yels for their team, even if they *know* that their team is going to get creamed. I think what you are describing isn't "advocacy", it's "consulting". Maybe you would have better luck selling this idea, if you were posting on the "freebsd-consulting" mailing list? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 5: 8:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE22B37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 05:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from rhadamanth.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust47.cdf.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B26C43E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 05:08:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by rhadamanth.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 18Fa1P-0002Dq-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:08:31 +0000 Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:08:31 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021123130831.GB5036@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Anthony Atkielski , FreeBSD Advocacy References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> X-message-flag: All your linuxconf-configured redhat are belong to us. X-message-flag-attribution: suresh, sdm. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 09:40:43AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > That's amply demonstrated in email which is so > > badly laid out that you'd think people would be > > ashamed of it. > > Most people don't care. They are interested only in the content of e-mail, > not in its formatting or in the conformance of its headers to any arbitrary > standard. Only geeks care about the latter things, and geeks are an > increasingly small minority of computer users. Everybody here cares (except you). By not formatting your email with respect to it's targeted audience, you are displaying rudeness, in much the same way as posting private email to the list is (especially when you refuse to apologize, even after being told that it's not the done thing). Ceri -- Reckoning awaits! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 5:59:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A8337B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 05:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D8143EA3 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 05:59:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANDxr988350 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:59:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <025b01c292f8$9941b480$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ?æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    ÇS lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ ing.com> <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5AB4.E71E4E67@mindspring.com> <024301c292e3$51b6ef50$0a00000a@atkielski.com>    >U lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF65A4.6F21D8D5@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:59:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Hey, you're the one complaining about the duplicates. I wasn't complaining about them, I was simply explaining how I handle them. I _was_ complaining about a mailing list that doesn't provide a proper reply address to respond to the list, however. > You're still not running the full version > of "Outlook". I know. I have an SMTP server, not an Exchange server, so the "full" version of Outlook would be a waste of time. > And take responsibility when your defective coping > mechanism results in private emails bein posted to > a public mailing list, in whole or in part. Accidents happen. > You should set your "Reply-To:"... I can't, at least not for individual e-mails. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 6: 7:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6600C37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE3943E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:07:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANE76988420 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:07:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <026201c292f9$9b84aa30$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> <024801c292e3$824f45e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> À| <3DDF68AF.E5F94C90@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:07:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Earlier you stated, in a post to the list, > in response to a post by Greg Lehey [...]: > > > Part of rational advocacy is recognizing > > the strengths AND the weaknesses of one's > > favored OS. Yes. I don't see any bashing there. > What you neglected to state was: > > And then playing up the strengths, while > playing down and/or providing workarounds > for the weaknesses. It is not neglect to avoid stating what I do not believe. I prefer to present an objective picture insofar as possible. While emphasizing strengths when the situation warrants it seems harmless enough, I will not "play down" weaknesses, nor will I suggest workarounds for fundamental defects in a product. I have no sacred mission to cause anyone to adopt or avoid any particular software product, and so I will not attempt to deceive anyone in my descriptions. > You seem intolerant of the idea of "an advocate" ... I have no problem with advocates. Proselytizers are a different story. And prostitutes are more extreme still. > Advocacy doesn't work like that: it's "all or > nothing". You may be confusing advocacy with religion. > I think what you are describing isn't "advocacy", > it's "consulting". It's advocacy. What you are describing is irrationality, i.e., religious fervor. > Maybe you would have better luck selling this > idea, if you were posting on the "freebsd-consulting" > mailing list? What leads you to believe that my luck has been poor up to now? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 6: 8:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012FA37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:08:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A40A43E3B for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:08:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANE8Y988435 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:08:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <026701c292f9$cf835d40$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123130831.GB5036@submonkey.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:08:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ceri writes: > Everybody here cares (except you). But everybody here is part of a small minority of geeks; we are not representative of typical computer users. > By not formatting your email with respect to > it's targeted audience, you are displaying > rudeness, in much the same way as posting > private email to the list is (especially when > you refuse to apologize, even after being told > that it's not the done thing). Worrying about the details of e-mail formatting is precisely the type of geek behavior to which I've alluded. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 10:29:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DAE37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from t-indiv5-88.athome.tue.nl (t-indiv5-88.athome.tue.nl [131.155.241.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B4D243E3B for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:29:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from avleeuwen@piwebs.com) Received: (qmail 21243 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2002 18:29:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO amd760.piwebs.com) (192.168.0.105) by 0 with SMTP; 23 Nov 2002 18:29:25 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Arjan van Leeuwen To: "Anthony Atkielski" , "FreeBSD Advocacy" Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 19:29:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <20021123130831.GB5036@submonkey.net> <026701c292f9$cf835d40$0a00000a@atkielski.com> In-Reply-To: <026701c292f9$cf835d40$0a00000a@atkielski.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200211231929.18012.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Although I am tempted to reply to Anthony's many emails, I won't, because= the=20 other messages have already made clear to me that Anthony doesn't seem to= be=20 really open towards new solutions or arguments. As this discussion doesn't look like advocacy to me _at all_, I suggest=20 Anthony and everyone else who'd like to reply to him move this discussion= to=20 the freebsd-chat mailing list. Thank you. On Saturday 23 November 2002 15:08, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Ceri writes: > > Everybody here cares (except you). > > But everybody here is part of a small minority of geeks; we are not > representative of typical computer users. > > > By not formatting your email with respect to > > it's targeted audience, you are displaying > > rudeness, in much the same way as posting > > private email to the list is (especially when > > you refuse to apologize, even after being told > > that it's not the done thing). > > Worrying about the details of e-mail formatting is precisely the type o= f > geek behavior to which I've alluded. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 12:24:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437F537B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:24:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7534843EA9 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 12:24:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fwd11.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18Fgpc-0007dq-09; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:24:48 +0100 Received: from jhs.muc.de (520006753247-0001@[217.228.212.241]) by fmrl11.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18FgpQ-0FyD7AC; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:24:36 +0100 Received: from flip.jhs.private (flip.jhs.private [192.168.91.24]) by jhs.muc.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gANKTwC69270; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:29:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from flip.jhs.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flip.jhs.private (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gANKTOs50088; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:29:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@flip.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200211232029.gANKTOs50088@flip.jhs.private> To: "Anthony Atkielski" Cc: "FreeBSD Advocacy" Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) In-Reply-To: Message from "Anthony Atkielski" of "Sat, 23 Nov 2002 03:21:04 +0100." <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:29:24 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" X-Sender: 520006753247-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: "Anthony Atkielski" > one's favored OS. UNIX is a usually a poor choice for the desktop, and Expanded Reality ;-) UNIX is a poor choice for the intellectually lazy, or incompetent; Usually than 50% of PC users are intellectually lazy, or incompetent; So UNIX is a poor choice for these people's desktop. Microsoft get paid heavily to support their choice market sector: the mostly intellectually lazy, ignorant, or hopelessly incompetent. Many MS users would be an unpaid liability for BSD. Dumb fumble & click lazy losers are best left to their MS rip off prices, bootlegs, viruses & crashes. Those prepared to exercise their brain learning are worth recruiting to BSD though, if they realise that though BSD requires no purchase price, it does require time to read docs & think. 6500 ported FreeBSD packages inc. many window managers gives a wide choice of desktops, but never would I try to recruit all classes of MS-users to BSD. Julian Stacey jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer & Unix Consultant, Munich. Ihr Rauchen = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz ! Schnupftabak probieren. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 13:26:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FB137B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1961C43E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:26:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANLQn991316 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:26:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <02d701c29337$08749e60$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <200211232029.gANKTOs50088@flip.jhs.private> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:26:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Julian writes: > Expanded Reality ;-) > UNIX is a poor choice for the intellectually > lazy, or incompetent; Usually than 50% of PC > users are intellectually lazy, or incompetent; > So UNIX is a poor choice for these people's desktop. The last statement is true. The previous two are not. UNIX is a poor choice for people who are not interested in computers _per se_, but instead only in computers as tools. UNIX requires too much technical knowledge to exploit usefully on the desktop. The ideal desktop for the non-specialist in IT is a desktop that requires minimal knowledge to use successfully in the accomplishment of whatever tasks the user has in mind. This tends to favor the Mac much more than Windows, except that the Mac has other compensating disadvantages that prevent it from reaching a position of dominance in the market. The next in line is Windows; and in fact, Windows is the leading desktop OS by far. The various flavors of UNIX are far, far behind. > Microsoft get paid heavily to support their > choice market sector: the mostly intellectually > lazy, ignorant, or hopelessly incompetent. Your disdain for people who happen not to share your interests or obsessions is an excellent illustration of precisely the attitude that impedes the advocacy of operating systems such as UNIX. Microsoft knows better than to call its customers lazy, incompetent, or stupid--but you, apparently, have not yet learned this essential fact. One reason FreeBSD and many other operating systems remain only marginally present in many environments is that their primary supporters are socially naïve and gratuitously aggressive young males. > Many MS users would be an unpaid liability for BSD. Worry not ... no mass migration from Microsoft operating systems to FreeBSD is likely in the foreseeable future; and even if all other obstacles were overcome to such a migration, the attitudes of people like yourself would still prevent it. > Dumb fumble & click lazy losers are best left > to their MS rip off prices, bootlegs, viruses > & crashes. See above. > Those prepared to exercise their brain learning > are worth recruiting to BSD though ... Many people with brains are not interested in BSD, however; and those who might be are likely to be put off by the puerile behavior of many of the operating system's advocates. Clubs of thirteen-year-old boys tend to be attractive only to thirteen-year-old boys. > ... if they realise that though BSD requires no > purchase price, it does require time to read docs > & think. If they are given the impression that they will be surrounded by rabid teenagers prone to violent and ill-considered religious tirades should they undertake to use BSD, however, they may well abandon the project before it has begun. > 6500 ported FreeBSD packages inc. many window > managers gives a wide choice of desktops ... People don't want a wide choice of desktops. They just want a machine that does the job, and then they're done. > ... but never would I try to recruit all classes > of MS-users to BSD. If any of them are reading this thread, I'm sure you've scared them off pretty effectively--more so than I can realistically counter with my own meager dose of unemotional rationality, I'm afraid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 13:35:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0BC37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6361443E3B for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:35:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANLZ8991376 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:35:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:35:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Freddie writes: > Actually, they aren't. Actually, they are. Two entirely different codebases, last time I looked at the code. The similarity is in name alone. > OE is nothing more than the mail engine for > Outlook, and Outlook is nothing more than a > PIM wrapper around OE. They are one and the > same, just with different feature sets. Unless both products have been rewritten from scratch in the past 36 months, this is completely untrue. OE evolved from a crude Internet e-mail function integrated into Internet Explorer. Outlook was a separately developed product originally associated with Office, IIRC, and then adapted to work with Exchange Server in place of the original Exchange client. I believe there was still a third version of Outlook shipped with Windows 95 (the details are fuzzy now). OE handles only Internet e-mail. Outlook handles any kind of e-mail, as long as an appropriate provider is installed, e.g., Internet e-mail (POP3 or IMAP), Exchange Server's proprietary e-mail interface, the old Microsoft Mail interface, and so on (I believe there are providers for Lotus Notes and other systems as well, although obviously Microsoft does not sell those). I consider Outlook overkill if one uses only Internet mail. I use Outlook Express exclusively. However, if one is using Microsoft Exchange Server, Outlook is a very nice client for that product. OE can go against MXS if the latter is configured to serve SMTP and POP3 clients. Outlook can go against SMTP and POP3 (and IMAP or HTTP) servers if the proper providers are configured. I wouldn't mind having a text-only client for UNIX, if one exists that does not require memorization of a hundred arcane keyboard sequences just for basic use. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 14: 8:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7133E37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1327843E3B for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:08:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANM8f991640 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:08:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <02ed01c2933c$e2b7c390$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDFF5A3.10708@mtbiker.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:08:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John writes: > Look, dude, why don't you go and start > microsoft-windowsxp-advocacy somewhere else. I'm curious: How do you hope to win new converts to FreeBSD if you cannot tolerate anyone who isn't already converted? > Leave the rest of us UNIX/BSD users alone. How will you increase your numbers if you are unwilling to discuss your favorite operating system with heathen users of other operating systems? > We enjoy UNIX desktops. Obviously. > How hard is that for you to comprehend? Not hard at all. But the list is dedicated to advocacy, not the status quo, and telling people to go away every time they fail to embrace FreeBSD unconditionally and completely isn't going to encourage the spread of the OS. > Actually, I invite you to try Mac OS X. Windows already does everything that I require, and nowadays I don't play with computers for their own sakes unless I'm paid for it. > Wonderful desktop, BSD underneath, beats the > snot out of WindowsXP as far as ease of use. So what do you run for your desktop? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 14:33:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2D737B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:33:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57A043E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:33:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0259.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.4] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18Fipv-0001Jy-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:33:16 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE001DB.29C07F4D@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:31:56 -0800 From: Terry Lambert Reply-To: anthony@freebie.atkielski.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ?æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    ÇS lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ ing.com> <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5AB4.E71E4E67@mindspring.com> <024301c292e3$51b6ef50$0a00000a@atkielski.com>    >U lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF65A4.6F21D8D5@mindspring.com> <025b01c292f8$9941b480$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > You should set your "Reply-To:"... > > I can't, at least not for individual e-mails. I guess you should use ZMail instead of Outlook. If you can't do that, Netscape also supports setting a "Reply-To:". For example, this message sets it to you. --Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 14:36:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651D237B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:36:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB6F43E88 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:36:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gANMaq991867 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:36:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <02fc01c29340$d26c7b30$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> <01dc01c292c6$e31cca90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> ?æ¿¿ìë¿¿ü¿¿á  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿?(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(?® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(?® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    §P lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF4582.91B6820B@mindspr! (= ¿ð?¤(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    ÇS lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ ing.com> <021601c292d8$97fc49c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5AB4.E71E4E67@mindspring.com> <024301c292e3$51b6ef50$0a00000a@atkielski.com>    >U lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DDF65A4.6F21D8D5@mindspring.com> <025b01c292f8$9941b480$0a00000a@atkielski.com>    Ãf lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DE001DB.29! C07F4D@mindspring.com > Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:36:53 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > I guess you should use ZMail instead of Outlook. I don't use Outlook, I use Outlook Express. Anyway, it would not make much sense to change e-mail clients just for one feature used on only one list in one circumstance. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 14:46:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5F237B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073C243E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:46:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0259.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.4] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18Fj2R-00070K-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:46:12 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE004E3.74E12938@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 14:44:51 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> <024801c292e3$824f45e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> À| <3DDF68AF.E5F94C90@mindspring.com> <026201c292f9$9b84aa30$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > I think what you are describing isn't "advocacy", > > it's "consulting". > > It's advocacy. What you are describing is irrationality, i.e., religious > fervor. The Macintosh Way Guy Kawasaki ISBN 0-06-097338-2 I'm guessing since he has more money than you, and money is how we keep score in Western society, that he's right, and you're wrong. > > Maybe you would have better luck selling this > > idea, if you were posting on the "freebsd-consulting" > > mailing list? > > What leads you to believe that my luck has been poor up to now? People's universally negative reaction to you? No one has posted in support of your position. No one. It's very obvious that you are a paid Microsoft advocate, and that Summer vacation is over, so here you are, back on the list again. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 15:10:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA4E37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E690143E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:10:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 60F645190A; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:40:25 +1030 (CST) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:40:25 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021123231025.GF39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF48DD.8A522A2A@mindspring.com> <022701c292d9$47aa5920$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5B5C.C1BE4091@mindspring.com> <025101c292e3$ac6ea8c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <025101c292e3$ac6ea8c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] On Saturday, 23 November 2002 at 12:30:06 +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > >> Do they have signature lines that contain their email addresses? > > I don't remember. I don't usually read signature lines. Too far down the page? Greg -- When replying to this message, please take care not to mutilate the original text. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/email.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 15:26:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8821737B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B16C43E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0259.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.4] helo=mindspring.com) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FjfJ-0007lr-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:26:21 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE00E4A.1B6A0D8A@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:24:58 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: [ ... BSD about Outlook and Outlook Express ... ] Actually, both were written by a contracting company in Tucson, Arizona. My former manager at a company I worked in between 1994 and 1997 works for that company, which no longer does the developement for Microsoft (i.e. he is not to blame for Outlook). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 15:30:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAAD37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:30:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BE443E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:30:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0259.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.4] helo=mindspring.com) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FjjH-00040L-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:30:27 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE00F41.D5D828E9@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:29:05 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDFF5A3.10708@mtbiker.net> <02ed01c2933c$e2b7c390$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > John writes: > > Look, dude, why don't you go and start > > microsoft-windowsxp-advocacy somewhere else. > > I'm curious: How do you hope to win new converts to FreeBSD if you cannot > tolerate anyone who isn't already converted? If you kill everyone who is not a FreeBSD user, all you have left is FreeBSD users. Then you win. 8-) 8-). > Not hard at all. But the list is dedicated to advocacy, not the status quo, It's dedicated to advocacy of FreeBSD. Feel free to advocate FreeBSD. If you feel the need to advocate Windows, go elsewhere. > > Actually, I invite you to try Mac OS X. > > Windows already does everything that I require, and nowadays I don't play > with computers for their own sakes unless I'm paid for it. So basically, you are being paid to hang out here. I wonder by whom... not. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 16:57:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBDF37B404 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:57:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ocis.net (mailserver.ocis.net [209.52.173.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D6343E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:57:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fcash@mail.ocis.net) Received: from host64.wireless.kamloops.net ([64.114.144.93] helo=rizzen) by mail.ocis.net with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 18Fl5c-0007sx-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:57:36 -0800 From: "Freddie Cash" Organization: PhoenixTek Consulting To: "Anthony Atkielski" Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:55:11 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Reply-To: fcash@bigfoot.com Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3DDFB2EF.19129.5E88EE4@localhost> In-reply-to: <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 23 Nov 2002 at 22:35, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Freddie writes: > > Actually, they aren't. > Actually, they are. Two entirely different codebases, last time I looked at > the code. The similarity is in name alone. > > OE is nothing more than the mail engine for > > Outlook, and Outlook is nothing more than a > > PIM wrapper around OE. They are one and the > > same, just with different feature sets. > Unless both products have been rewritten from scratch in the past 36 months, > this is completely untrue. As of Outlook 2000, you cannot install it without first installing OE 5. And if you uninstall OE 5, then Outlook 2000 will not run. I haven't tried Outlook XP. I went through this whole rigamarole two weeks ago as I set up my helpdesk station. I hate OE with a passion, and Outlook only slightly less, but have to run Outlook for the helpdesk. I installed Office 97 with Outlook. OE 5 was installed along with it. I uninstalled OE 5. Outlook gave some weird errors that I ignored. I tried to install Office 2000 with Outlook. The installer installed OE 5 again. I uninstalled OE. Outlook wouldn't start. Upgraded to IE 6 with OE 6. Tried to uninstall OE 6 and the installer popped up saying that OE cannot be installed as Outlook 2000 depends on it. Try this on your system. I've fought with OE/Outlook and have come to the conclusion that OE is the mail engine in Outlook. There's no other explanation for it that I can think of. Cheers, Freddie fcash@bigfoot.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 17: 9:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CFE37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0D343EB7 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:09:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAO195993089 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <030601c29356$15c57d90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> <024801c292e3$824f45e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> À| <3DDF68AF.E5F94C90@mindspring.com> <026201c292f9$9b84aa30$0a00000a@atkielski.com>  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿¾(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(¨® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(¨® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    /g lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DE004E3.74E12938@mindspr! ing.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:09:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > I'm guessing since he has more money than you, > and money is how we keep score in Western society, > that he's right, and you're wrong. I try to draw conclusions based on something more tangible than guessing. > People's universally negative reaction to you? What leads you to believe that people universally react negatively to me? > No one has posted in support of your position. > No one. I post in support of my own position. I don't need cheerleaders, and I know better to believe that a widely held opinion is necessarily a correct opinion (or vice versa). More significantly, you haven't posted anything in support of your _own_ position. All of your posts up to now have been essentially just personal attacks on me; but you don't provide any actual support for your own position, which I find intriguing. > It's very obvious that you are a paid Microsoft > advocate, and that Summer vacation is over, so here > you are, back on the list again. I don't understand. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 17: 9:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA82A37B4EB for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:09:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3CD43E3B for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:09:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAO19b993098 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:09:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <030b01c29356$28767e80$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123082710.GD39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <020501c292cc$03275c10$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF48DD.8A522A2A@mindspring.com> <022701c292d9$47aa5920$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5B5C.C1BE4091@mindspring.com> <025101c292e3$ac6ea8c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123231025.GF39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:09:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg writes: > Too far down the page? No, simply irrelevant to the content of the message. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 17:10:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9327F37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:10:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC53A43EA3 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:10:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAO1AZ993111 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:10:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <031001c29356$4b383300$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DE00E4A.1B6A0D8A@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:10:35 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > Actually, both were written by a contracting > company in Tucson, Arizona. Name the company. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 17:12: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32A937B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:12:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0179D43E9C for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:12:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAO1C3993130 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:12:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <031c01c29356$7f408300$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDFF5A3.10708@mtbiker.net> <02ed01c2933c$e2b7c390$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DE00F41.D5D828E9@mindspring.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:12:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Terry writes: > It's dedicated to advocacy of FreeBSD. Feel > free to advocate FreeBSD. If you feel the > need to advocate Windows, go elsewhere. It is increasingly obvious to me why Windows is doing so well. > So basically, you are being paid to hang out > here. I wonder by whom... not. Please elaborate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 17:18:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0191637B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:18:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C146743E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:18:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAO1Ip993193 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:18:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <032801c29357$72507af0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <3DDFB2EF.19129.5E88EE4@localhost> Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 02:18:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Freddie writes: > As of Outlook 2000, you cannot install it > without first installing OE 5. I'll take your word for it, as I have not worked with Outlook 2000. > I installed Office 97 with Outlook. OE 5 > was installed along with it. OE 5 didn't exist when Office 97 was released, as I recall. > Try this on your system. Why? I have Office 97 installed already. I use OE 6 for e-mail. Outlook is installed but I no longer use it. > I've fought with OE/Outlook and have come to > the conclusion that OE is the mail engine in > Outlook. As I've said, unless the code has been _completely rewritten_, that is not the case. They are two different products. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 17:48:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983DB37B401; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:48:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from softweyr.com (softweyr.com [209.63.227.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A99D43E88; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:48:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from homer.softweyr.com ([204.68.178.39] helo=softweyr.com) by softweyr.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18Flsv-0006F3-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:48:33 -0700 Message-ID: <3DE02FE8.AAF4FBFB@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:48:24 -0800 From: Wes Peters Reply-To: advocacy@freebsd.org Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anders Nordby Cc: Paul Saab , developers@FreeBSD.org, advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advocacy: HotJobs moving to FreeBSD References: <20021124004518.GA8042@totem.fix.no> <20021124005014.GA41304@elvis.mu.org> <20021124010245.GA8345@totem.fix.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anders Nordby wrote: > > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 04:50:14PM -0800, Paul Saab wrote: > > Umm.. Hotjobs is owned by Yahoo! now.. Sorta makes sense... ;) > > For us, yes. For other people, well? The more we can get the word out, > the better, right? Also, since HotJobs is a large site (?), we have lots > to win by telling the world IMO. It's on daily.daemonnews.org. If you have contacts in the "real" press, and can get them to do a case study of this, that would be great. I'm a little confused that this message was sent to developers@ rather than advocacy@, where you're at least likely to find some people who WANT to help in some way. Replies have been directed there. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 18:53:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9796E37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:53:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D550C43E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:53:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 18Fmto-0005HQ-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:53:32 +0100 Received: from jhs.muc.de (520006753247-0001@[217.235.123.171]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 18Fmtm-1iGZouC; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:53:30 +0100 Received: from flip.jhs.private (flip.jhs.private [192.168.91.24]) by jhs.muc.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAO2wuC70851 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:58:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from flip.jhs.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flip.jhs.private (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gAO2wfs54255 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:58:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@flip.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200211240258.gAO2wfs54255@flip.jhs.private> To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" Subject: Non compliance with list remit. Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:58:41 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" X-Sender: 520006753247-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have informed postmaster@ that IMO, one person's postings these last 2 days have distracted us from our objective: From: Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG >>>> info freebsd-advocacy FREEBSD-ADVOCACY Furthering the Use of FreeBSD Share ideas and plan to increase the number of companies and individuals using FreeBSD If others also tell postmaster similar, it may help. Julian Stacey jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer & Unix Consultant, Munich. Ihr Rauchen = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz ! Schnupftabak probieren. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 18:56:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4825B37B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:56:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-101-2-1-14.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.59.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA92643E9C for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:56:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Received: from contactdish (contactdish.atkielski.com [10.0.0.10]) by freebie.atkielski.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id gAO2uC994398 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:56:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from anthony@freebie.atkielski.com) Message-ID: <034901c29365$0ce5ec50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> From: "Anthony Atkielski" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <200211240258.gAO2wfs54255@flip.jhs.private> Subject: Re: Non compliance with list remit. Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 03:56:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Doesn't your FreeBSD system include a delete key? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julian H. Stacey" To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 03:58 Subject: Non compliance with list remit. > I have informed postmaster@ that IMO, one person's postings > these last 2 days have distracted us from our objective: > > From: Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG > >>>> info freebsd-advocacy > FREEBSD-ADVOCACY Furthering the Use of FreeBSD > Share ideas and plan to increase the number of companies and > individuals using FreeBSD > > If others also tell postmaster similar, it may help. > > Julian Stacey > jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer & Unix Consultant, Munich. > Ihr Rauchen = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz ! Schnupftabak probieren. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 20: 3: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF9137B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pop.freedomvoice.com (pop.freedomvoice.com [65.244.199.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E097943E9C for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:03:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgowdy@cox.net) Received: (qmail 28881 invoked by uid 0); 24 Nov 2002 04:02:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cptnhosedonkey) (jeremiah@68.7.36.2) by pop.freedomvoice.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2002 04:02:35 -0000 Message-ID: <003b01c2936e$60ec74f0$0200a8c0@cptnhosedonkey> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Anthony Atkielski" , "FreeBSD Advocacy" References: <200211240258.gAO2wfs54255@flip.jhs.private> <034901c29365$0ce5ec50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Subject: Re: Non compliance with list remit. Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:02:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You are entitled to your opinions, and I'm sure you're not the only FreeBSD user who thinks FreeBSD makes a fantastic server, but prefers Windows on the desktop. I actually feel that way myself. But at this point, you are simply trolling the list and detracting from the advocacy campaign. I would like to politely request that you keep future messages on these threads or any derived threads off the main list, and merely CC them to the parties you think are interested in the topic. Either that, or use -chat. > Doesn't your FreeBSD system include a delete key? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Julian H. Stacey" > To: "FreeBSD Advocacy" > Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 03:58 > Subject: Non compliance with list remit. > > > > I have informed postmaster@ that IMO, one person's postings > > these last 2 days have distracted us from our objective: > > > > From: Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG > > >>>> info freebsd-advocacy > > FREEBSD-ADVOCACY Furthering the Use of FreeBSD > > Share ideas and plan to increase the number of companies and > > individuals using FreeBSD > > > > If others also tell postmaster similar, it may help. > > > > Julian Stacey > > jhs @ berklix.com Computer Systems Engineer & Unix Consultant, Munich. > > Ihr Rauchen = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz ! Schnupftabak probieren. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 20:25:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AF437B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-232-220-15.client.attbi.com [12.232.220.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAB943E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id gAO4P9Uf002204; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id gAO4P9px002203; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:25:09 -0800 From: David Schultz To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) Message-ID: <20021124042509.GA2154@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Anthony Atkielski , FreeBSD Advocacy References: <3DDFB2EF.19129.5E88EE4@localhost> <032801c29357$72507af0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <032801c29357$72507af0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Insufficient SNR. Please take this discussion off-list, or to a more appropriate place such as comp.os.linux.advocacy. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 22:18: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF1237B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:18:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568B043E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:18:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0280.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.25] helo=mindspring.com) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18Fq5h-0000I0-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:18:02 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE06EC8.5576053A@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:16:40 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com> <021c01c292d9$1dd01590$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDF5ADF.21BC5B31@mindspring.com> <024801c292e3$824f45e0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> À| <3DDF68AF.E5F94C90@mindspring.com> <026201c292f9$9b84aa30$0a00000a@atkielski.com>  eI (øf ( "P ( æ¿¿CSß;pæ¿¿Àå¿¿ ±( Èð `ç¿¿ ³ð 0À øå¿¿ æ¿¿Ìæ¿¿¾(tæ¿¿¿ð8ç¿¿u(¨® (àÑ (Dç¿¿á (Ò ( à aÒ( ç¿¿ àÑ (= üæ¿¿6Ò(¨® (àÑ (Ò ( (ìë¿¿ÜQç¿¿¹?( ç¿¿ àÑ (= ¿ð??(ìë¿¿lQìë¿¿ (ç¿¿ t (    /g lü¿¿ÿ¿ðì¿¿ <3DE004E3.74E12938@mindspr! ing.com> <030601c29356$15c57d90$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > People's universally negative reaction to you? > > What leads you to believe that people universally react negatively to me? The meager evidence of my eyes and ears. > More significantly, you haven't posted anything in support of your _own_ > position. All of your posts up to now have been essentially just personal > attacks on me; but you don't provide any actual support for your own > position, which I find intriguing. Hardly. I don't engage in adhominim attacks. A person who engagers in discussion like this needs to be able to seperate an attack on their ideas from an attack on their person. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 22:18:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D830837B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:18:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9007243E6E for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:18:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0280.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.25] helo=mindspring.com) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18Fq6L-0000lV-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:18:41 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE06EEF.F321ECDA@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:17:19 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DE00E4A.1B6A0D8A@mindspring.com> <031001c29356$4b383300$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > Actually, both were written by a contracting > > company in Tucson, Arizona. > > Name the company. IKON Office Systems. -- terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 22:31:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABE337B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:31:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B072243E88 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:31:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0280.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.25] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FqIp-0001Me-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:31:35 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE071F3.F7D8CAAA@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:30:11 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <3DDF7691.22726.4FCB4F2@localhost> <02dc01c29338$320168c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DDFF5A3.10708@mtbiker.net> <02ed01c2933c$e2b7c390$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <3DE00F41.D5D828E9@mindspring.com> <031c01c29356$7f408300$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Terry writes: > > It's dedicated to advocacy of FreeBSD. Feel > > free to advocate FreeBSD. If you feel the > > need to advocate Windows, go elsewhere. > > It is increasingly obvious to me why Windows is doing so well. Blind, unreasoning support of it by morons who have bought into the idea that "What's good for Microsoft, is good for America"? > > So basically, you are being paid to hang out > > here. I wonder by whom... not. > > Please elaborate. You are a paid troll. You are paid to put opinions which are dictated to you by your employers in the FreeBSD-Advocacy lists and list archives, such that if someone wants to go find out if FreeBSD will be a good desktop system, instead of getting honest opinions by people using FreeBSD as a desktop system, they see your crap about how "FreeBSD is just a server OS, and doesn't work well as a desktop" -- which is a blatant lie on your part. Further, you go out of your way to remove message headers; specifically, you re-address each message, so that there is no "In-Reply-To:" header, so it's impossible to find the arguments preceeding yours, lending them an apparent higher score than they would be able to achieve on your own in context. It is this, not an hinest mistake, which resulted in your posting of private email to the mailing list: because you start with a new message body for your reponse, rather than using a reply option, and then cut-and paste the message you are replying to into the message body. The tools you use to do this are also the reason that you tend to truncate quoted message bodies line lengths, reformatting messages into near-unreadability. It is my opinion that this is probably an intended effect of the tools, so that the messages you post have two portions: the portion to which you are replying, which is formatted into near-unreadability, and the portion that you yourself wrote, which is not formatted this way, thus increasing the probability that anoyone reading such a message will skip your opponents arguments, and read only the crap you have written. Other rhetorical techniques are also used to substantiate your position, particularly when you are faced with someone who is catching you out for the shill you are, such as dangling short questions, quoting material out of context, answering questions not asked, etc., etc.. You are a moron, if you believe that the people on this list do not see through your little charade at "advocacy"(*). Luckily, there are people who will refuse to allow them to be archived as stand-alone statements; when people go searhing the mailing list archives for threads, they will find followups, like this one, which shows your post for what it is. -- Terry (*) Conditionalized -- therefore not ad hominim; if you chose to trigger the condition, you're the one calling yourself names To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat Nov 23 22:36:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3C037B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:36:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6700B43E91 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:36:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0280.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.193.25] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FqNd-00059j-00; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:36:33 -0800 Message-ID: <3DE0731D.594FD3AE@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:35:09 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <3DDFB2EF.19129.5E88EE4@localhost> <032801c29357$72507af0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > I've fought with OE/Outlook and have come to > > the conclusion that OE is the mail engine in > > Outlook. > > As I've said, unless the code has been _completely rewritten_, that is not > the case. They are two different products. Both Outlook Express and the full edition share a number of bugs. One would expect them to have different bugs, if they were truly different (which they are not: they share code). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message