From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 10:09:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE93516A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:09:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAB343D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n28so19486nfc for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:09:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=k313A42y9ocA8rH44W1KJ5sa7F0se/47YhoY8DqsrJDswtTE1Lny4RIPx9p/LHfsjWPevQEEP6ZE+DSKwnB3API2kfsnD/Wq6H0mgqr+CGLXBMz134lQD+9I97pCWpMYY7sOzrrB+4yX56Ru/7Pn+pjMFK9LWN43XIAJoMY18a0= Received: by 10.48.142.8 with SMTP id p8mr842461nfd; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:09:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.216.4 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:09:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:09:51 -0500 From: Xn Nooby To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Will VMWare 5.5 run on FreeBSD 6.x ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:09:55 -0000 I notice VMWare 5.5 worked with Redhat 8, and FreeBSD 6 uses Redhat 8 for its linux emulation. Does the Linux version of VMWare 5.5 work on FreeBSD 6.x ? I saw the VM 5.5 toolbox and some kind of "guest daemon" in the ports tree, but it didn't look like VMWare 5.5 itself was in there. I bought VMWare 5.5 for Linux, and assumed I'd have to run Ubuntu to use it= , but I would prefer FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:07:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C4216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:07:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timopie@fastmail.fm) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC09743D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:07:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timopie@fastmail.fm) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29883D2EC6B for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:07:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from web1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.210]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:07:34 -0500 Received: by web1.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2BA3826B1D; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:07:34 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1136783254.17548.251382603@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: IFlAuFwWavIjl4qFbDDamg9rdIAPhC0RpL2jNTk/NTj5 1136783254 From: "Tim Opie" To: "freebsd-emulation" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.15; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <20060107120028.ADB1016A436@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060107120028.ADB1016A436@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:07:34 +1000 Subject: Microsoft Offfice on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:07:37 -0000 The howto hinges heavily on CrossCver office running via linux..... I personally feel it would be easier to make a pledge to Crossover Office that you will buy one copy when it is available on FreeBSD (which they are currently taking http://www.codeweavers.com/site/compatibility/browse/cat/?app_id=573 ), and wait for them to do the really hard work.....which they have stated they will do of there is enough interest.....but that's just me :) btw: this post is not intended as any kind of promotion. I have nothing to do with CrossOver, I just support applications that support FreeBSD, which I am hoping will soon include this :) > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 04:22:09 -0500 > From: Tom Wickline > Subject: Microsoft Offfice on FreeBSD > To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > <53e3a9930601070122p577159d4oab42d283ed1b619d@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Hello, > > Since this is the emulation list I thought I would post this here. > I have put together a small MS Office on BSD via Wine Howto here: > > http://wiki.winehq.org/Office-BSD?action=show > > Tom / All wiyht. Rho sritched mg kegtops awound? / * Timothy Opie * timopie@fastmail.fm / http://www.granularsynthesis.com '--- FreeBSD? Naturally! ---http://www.freebsd.org -- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:02:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ABC16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C36B43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k09B2IAg066018 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:02:18 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k09B2HCq066012 for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:02:17 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:02:17 GMT Message-Id: <200601091102.k09B2HCq066012@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:02:19 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2000/09/22] kern/21463 emulation Linux compatability mode should not allow f [2002/11/07] kern/45023 emulation [linux] [patch] flexlm does not run with f [2003/09/24] kern/57192 emulation [linux] [hang] linux-ibm-java1.4 freeze f [2005/01/25] ports/76644 emulation FreeBSD 5.3 will freeze or crash when run o [2005/02/19] kern/77710 emulation [linux] Linux page fault sigcontext infor o [2005/12/27] ports/90958 emulation linux-* are not built on amd64 6 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [1999/04/16] kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with f [2001/08/14] kern/29698 emulation [linux] [patch] linux ipcs doesn'work f [2002/06/12] kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLIN o [2002/08/11] kern/41543 emulation [patch] feature request: easier wine/w23 o [2003/08/21] kern/55835 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux IPC emulation missi f [2004/10/19] ports/72865 emulation emulators/vmware3 crashes on 5.3-STABLE f [2004/10/20] kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on o [2004/11/10] kern/73777 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir f [2005/02/08] kern/77253 emulation [linux] meminfo in linprocfs returns bad o [2005/08/21] kern/85175 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation layer wit o [2006/01/04] kern/91293 emulation [svr4] [patch] *Experimental* Update to t 11 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 04:24:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FFE16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:24:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulbeard@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B87943D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:24:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulbeard@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout14/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k0A4O6K1012653 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.8] (dsl001-134-183.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [72.1.134.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k0A4O3ZU009070 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:24:06 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: paul beard Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:23:57 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: Subject: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:24:07 -0000 Convoluted steps tin upgrading linux-realplayer have forced an upgrade of linux-pango and this is where it comes to an ugly end. libXft is installed ===> Generating temporary packing list pango-1.6.0-7.i386.rpm /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.96087: line 1: sed: command not found /usr/bin/pango-querymodules-32: error while loading shared libraries: libXft.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory error: execution of %post scriptlet from pango-1.6.0-7 failed, exit status 127 /compat/linux/usr/bin/pango-querymodules-32: error while loading shared libraries: libXft.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory *** Error code 127 Stop in /opt/ports/x11-toolkits/linux-pango. *** Error code 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1262 Dec 18 05:01 /opt/ports/x11-fonts/ libXft/Makefile -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 429 Dec 18 05:01 /opt/ports/x11-fonts/ libXft/distinfo -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 442 May 14 2003 /opt/ports/x11-fonts/ libXft/pkg-descr -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 168 Jun 14 2005 /opt/ports/x11-fonts/ libXft/pkg-plist -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 80250 Jan 9 19:28 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11 Jan 9 19:28 /usr/X11R6/lib/ libXft.so -> libXft.so.2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 77185 Jan 9 19:28 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13 Dec 12 00:33 /usr/compat/linux/usr/ X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1 -> libXft.so.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 62460 Apr 1 2005 /usr/compat/linux/usr/ X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Dec 12 00:33 /usr/compat/linux/usr/ X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2 -> libXft.so.2.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 84580 Apr 1 2005 /usr/compat/linux/usr/ X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1.1 What can I try to resolve this? -- Paul Beard contact info: www.paulbeard.org/paulbeard.vcf Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 19:25:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C4016A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:25:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB4B43D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:25:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E4CB.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.228.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0AJKWsV057461; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:20:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0AJPhn1009623; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:25:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:25:42 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: paul beard Message-ID: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:25:48 -0000 On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:23:57 -0800 paul beard wrote: > Convoluted steps tin upgrading linux-realplayer have forced an > upgrade of linux-pango and this is where it comes to an ugly end. amd64 or x86? What does "portversion -v linux\*" print? Which version of FreeBSD (if -stable or -current: from when)? Bye, Alexander. -- ...and that is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 WL http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/registry/1FZ4DTHQE9PQ8/ref=wl_em_to/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 09:08:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D21F16A424 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:08:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD507442C7 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E4CB.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.228.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0B8sbse066873; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:54:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0B8xse6059034; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:59:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:59:54 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: paul beard References: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:08:40 -0000 paul beard wrote: > linux_base-rh-9 = up-to-date with port You're using a non-default linux_base port, so don't expect everything to work. The problem is, that the rh-9 one doesn't adds the linux X11 lib directory to the runtime linker search path by default. The default linux_base port does this. I told this (and the reason for it) to the maintainer of the rh-9 port several times, but he doesn't change the rh-9 port. Do this: echo '/usr/X11R6/lib' >> /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 One expresses well the love he does not feel. -- J.A. Karr From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 13:36:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F9316A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840F343D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:36:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1]) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Ewg9E-000Oyc-9Q; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:36:20 +0300 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ewg90-000KvQ-JF; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:36:06 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:36:06 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:59:54 +0100") Message-ID: <71140889@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, paul beard Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:36:29 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:59:54 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > paul beard wrote: > > linux_base-rh-9 = up-to-date with port > You're using a non-default linux_base port, so don't expect everything to > work. > The problem is, that the rh-9 one doesn't adds the linux X11 lib directory to > the runtime linker search path by default. The default linux_base port does > this. I told this (and the reason for it) to the maintainer of the rh-9 port > several times, but he doesn't change the rh-9 port. > Do this: > echo '/usr/X11R6/lib' >> /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf > /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig Yes, there is a PR on the matter: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/85254 Pay attention to followups. WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:53:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:53:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7CE43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:53:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5FD58.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.253.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BFlmMm068470; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:47:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0BFr7Hh035478; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:53:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:53:07 +0100 Message-ID: <20060111165307.lz00xrvhw8w8okok@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:53:07 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Boris Samorodov References: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> <71140889@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <71140889@srv.sem.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, paul beard Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:53:14 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: > Yes, there is a PR on the matter: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/85254 > > Pay attention to followups. The linux X11 port was modifying a file which belongs to the linux_base port. The value it added was fixed (the path to the linux X11 lib directory) and doesn't result in any breakage when added in the linux_base port. Modifying the contents of a file which does belong to another port results in warnings because of a changed MD5 sum when the file is deinstalled without the removal of the corresponding line by the port which added the line. Files from other ports shouldn't be touched if not absolutely necessary. Additionally the linux X11 port not only added one directory, it generated the file completely at install time (so it was possible to add a directory, the user may not wanted to add), but didn't resurrected the original file at deinstall time. In this case it isn't necessary to touch the file if the directory is included in the file at installation time of the linux_base port. Adding the entry to the file in the linux_base port was easy and solved 2 problems (adding and removing the entry to/from the file). It would have been possible to write code which does it correctly, but you have to consider all possible cases. This wouldn't have been as easy as the current solution, and you don't have to fear to have missed a case. It also solved an "distraction" (the warning of a changed file on upgrade). Summary: doing it the way it is is better than to do it the way it was before. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 Are we THERE yet? My MIND is a SUBMARINE!! From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 21:27:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02AC16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9FD43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from doc.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwnV9-0000In-9Z; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:27:27 +0300 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EwnUu-000FLV-GC; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:27:12 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> <71140889@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060111165307.lz00xrvhw8w8okok@netchild.homeip.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:27:12 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20060111165307.lz00xrvhw8w8okok@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:53:07 +0100") Message-ID: <83622623@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, paul beard Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:33 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:53:07 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Yes, there is a PR on the matter: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/85254 > > > > Pay attention to followups. > The linux X11 port was modifying a file which belongs to the linux_base port. > The value it added was fixed (the path to the linux X11 lib directory) and > doesn't result in any breakage when added in the linux_base port. > Modifying the contents of a file which does belong to another port results in > warnings because of a changed MD5 sum when the file is deinstalled without > the removal of the corresponding line by the port which added the line. > Files from other ports shouldn't be touched if not absolutely necessary. > Additionally the linux X11 port not only added one directory, it generated > the file completely at install time (so it was possible to add a directory, > the user may not wanted to add), but didn't resurrected the original file at > deinstall time. > In this case it isn't necessary to touch the file if the directory is > included in the file at installation time of the linux_base port. > Adding the entry to the file in the linux_base port was easy and solved 2 > problems (adding and removing the entry to/from the file). It would have > been possible to write code which does it correctly, but you have to > consider all possible cases. This wouldn't have been as easy as the current > solution, and you don't have to fear to have missed a case. It also solved > an "distraction" (the warning of a changed file on upgrade). As for me, I agree with you... > Summary: doing it the way it is is better than to do it the way it was > before. ...and understand that "the way it was before" means old linux x11 port that was changing the file... ..but don't quite understand what did you mean saying "the way it is". There are two ways: 1. The linux_base-rh9 port should be patched according to the PR. 2. Don't patch both, don't recommend using the linux_base-rh9 (and others) and answer on questions here? I.e. leave it as is. So far we do have the latter. Is it "the way it is" that you meant? [some time later] I wrote those words, but now think they are not very polite. Let me rephrase my thought. I'm very thankful for you and trevor@ for your contribution to FreeBSD. But we have two maintainers/committers with polar points of view on the matter. Something should be done. BTW, what if to print a message like this at after-install time for the linux X11 port: ----- Note that you may need to add a line "/usr/X11R6/lib" to the file ${LINUXBASE}/etc/ld.so.conf" manually (if you don't one) and then run ${LINUXBASE}/sbin/ldconfig. ----- I know that it won't be very helpful but at least we tried... WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 07:34:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAED716A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:34:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (jojo.ms-net.de [84.16.236.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA4243D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (p54A5E681.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.230.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.ebusiness-leidinger.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0C7Suil076361; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:28:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0C7YPHG030378; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:34:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:34:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20060112083425.t66g4lfb0gsks88o@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:34:25 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Boris Samorodov References: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> <71140889@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060111165307.lz00xrvhw8w8okok@netchild.homeip.net> <83622623@srv.sem.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <83622623@srv.sem.ipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.3) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, paul beard Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:34:29 -0000 Boris Samorodov wrote: >> Summary: doing it the way it is is better than to do it the way it was >> before. > > ...and understand that "the way it was before" means old linux x11 > port that was changing the file... Yes. > ..but don't quite understand what did you mean saying "the way it is". > There are two ways: > > 1. The linux_base-rh9 port should be patched according to the PR. > 2. Don't patch both, don't recommend using the linux_base-rh9 (and > others) and answer on questions here? I.e. leave it as is. > > So far we do have the latter. Is it "the way it is" that you meant? No, I was talking about the default linux_base port and the linux X11 port. Option number 1 should be done. > [some time later] > I wrote those words, but now think they are not very polite. Let me > rephrase my thought. > > I'm very thankful for you and trevor@ for your contribution to > FreeBSD. But we have two maintainers/committers with polar points of > view on the matter. Something should be done. I may want to note, that the default linux_base port was taken away from Trevor. It was handed over to emultaion@ by me after talking with portmgr about the responsivenes of Trevor and the importance of the linux infrastructure. While some other committers than me started to do a little bit of work on the emultaion-maintained ports, I seem to be the only major player (as in "committer") here. I don't like this. I would be happy if there would be some kind of redundancy and load-balancing here. And my opinions about the linux ports are not set in stone. Everybody is free so make sensible suggestions. Unfortunately Trevor doesn't seems to want to participate here. And while I try to give sensible technical reasons why the current linux_base is handled the way it is, Trevor just says something like "it was different before, change it back and it will work again" (paraphrased). Summary: - The default linux infrastructure is the standard. Every other port has to follow, or some good technical reasons have to be given to change the default linux infrastructure. - If someone want to earn a ports commit bit, I'm willing to mentor someone who is willing to work on the linux infrastructure. Prerequisites: * several good PR's for the linux infrastructure (TODO list available on request) * proven track record of endurance and availability (e.g. by providing PR's over a (unspecified) timespan and fixing bugs which pop up in a timely manner) * a mind (you don't have to say YES to everything I suggest, as long as you come up with good technical reasons to say no) > BTW, what if to print a message like this at after-install time for > the linux X11 port: > ----- > Note that you may need to add a line "/usr/X11R6/lib" to the file > ${LINUXBASE}/etc/ld.so.conf" manually (if you don't one) and then run > ${LINUXBASE}/sbin/ldconfig. > ----- Adding something like this sounds good, but I wouldn't be that polite: "Because of a bug in non-default linux_base ports, you have to add ...". Do you have an idea how one can detect a non-default linux_base port in a pkg-install script (pre-build package case)? I don't want to print something like this when using the default linux_base port. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 Paranoia is heightened awareness. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 13:59:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB2A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:59:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BA643D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:59:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from stat.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=srv.sem.ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1ExPSx-0006J3-2n; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:59:43 +0300 Received: from bsam by srv.sem.ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExPT6-00047J-1g; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:59:52 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20060110202542.7e049c4c@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20060111095954.c710azp5c0wwwkcg@netchild.homeip.net> <71140889@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060111165307.lz00xrvhw8w8okok@netchild.homeip.net> <83622623@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060112083425.t66g4lfb0gsks88o@netchild.homeip.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:59:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20060112083425.t66g4lfb0gsks88o@netchild.homeip.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:34:25 +0100") Message-ID: <26483271@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@freebsd.org, paul beard Subject: Re: having some trouble with linux-pango X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:59:55 -0000 On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:34:25 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: [skip] > > BTW, what if to print a message like this at after-install time for > > the linux X11 port: > > ----- > > Note that you may need to add a line "/usr/X11R6/lib" to the file > > ${LINUXBASE}/etc/ld.so.conf" manually (if you don't one) and then run > > ${LINUXBASE}/sbin/ldconfig. > > ----- > Adding something like this sounds good, but I wouldn't be that polite: > "Because of a bug in non-default linux_base ports, you have to add ...". > Do you have an idea how one can detect a non-default linux_base port in a > pkg-install script (pre-build package case)? I don't want to print something > like this when using the default linux_base port. I have another idea. Seams it's more strict to the message's goal: check for the line (/usr/X11R6/lib) at ${LINUXBASE}/etc/ld.so.conf. ;-) WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 14:24:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267F416A422; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netchild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF18043D46; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netchild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EEOkve009207; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:46 GMT (envelope-from netchild@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from netchild@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0EEOiOi009202; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:44 GMT (envelope-from netchild) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:44 GMT From: Alexander Leidinger Message-Id: <200601141424.k0EEOiOi009202@freefall.freebsd.org> To: avg@icyb.net.ua, netchild@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/72920: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:24:47 -0000 Synopsis: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: netchild State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 14 14:23:47 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: Feedback reveived, the bug still exist in -current. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72920 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 14:27:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B78116A41F; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:27:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netchild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9D543D79; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from netchild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EER2Pc009318; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:27:02 GMT (envelope-from netchild@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from netchild@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0EER2HZ009302; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:27:02 GMT (envelope-from netchild) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:27:02 GMT From: Alexander Leidinger Message-Id: <200601141427.k0EER2HZ009302@freefall.freebsd.org> To: turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp, netchild@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/77253: [linux] meminfo in linprocfs returns bad value about swap. X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:27:09 -0000 Synopsis: [linux] meminfo in linprocfs returns bad value about swap. State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open State-Changed-By: netchild State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 14 14:26:04 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: Still a problem on 5-stable: ---snip--- Yes, it is still bogus... polymer3 % uname -a FreeBSD polymer3.scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #11: Mon Dec 26 11:23:23 JST 2005 turutani@polymer3.scphys.kyotou.ac.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POLYMER i386 polymer3 % cat /compat/linux/proc/meminfo total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 527863808 90378240 437485568 16003072 0 25706496 Swap: 18446744071562067968 229376 18446744071561838592 MemTotal: 515492 kB MemFree: 427232 kB MemShared: 15628 kB Buffers: 0 kB Cached: 25104 kB SwapTotal:18014398507384832 kB SwapFree: 18014398507384608 kB polymer3 % swapinfo Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity /dev/ad0s1b 1048576 88 1048488 0% /dev/ad1s1b 1048576 136 1048440 0% Total 2097152 224 2096928 0% polymer3 % cat /var/run/dmesg.boot | grep memory real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 515629056 (491 MB) ---snip--- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77253 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:19:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA6B16A41F; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:19:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87AE43D48; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:19:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EIJd5r028622; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:19:39 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0EIJcJf028618; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:19:38 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:19:38 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200601141819.k0EIJcJf028618@freefall.freebsd.org> To: avg@icyb.net.ua, linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/72920: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:19:40 -0000 Synopsis: [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain socket addresses State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 14 18:19:19 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: ISTM 'analyzed' is a better state for this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72920 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:20:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523BA16A420; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088DC43D45; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EIKNBU028741; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:20:23 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0EIKN1H028737; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:20:23 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:20:23 GMT From: Mark Linimon Message-Id: <200601141820.k0EIKN1H028737@freefall.freebsd.org> To: turutani@scphys.kyoto-u.ac.jp, linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/77253: [linux] meminfo in linprocfs returns bad value about swap. X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:20:24 -0000 Synopsis: [linux] meminfo in linprocfs returns bad value about swap. State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sat Jan 14 18:20:04 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: ISTM 'analyzed' is a better state for this. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77253