From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 18:19:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F279E16A417 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Juergen.Dankoweit@t-online.de) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.de [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCEB13C467 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 18:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Juergen.Dankoweit@t-online.de) Received: from fwd32.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.aul.t-online.de with smtp id 1IRu2S-00051j-03; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:19:12 +0200 Received: from mail.juergendankoweit.net (XRwWf6ZfYeHVtFFNbmgJ6pGV5j6QK6MXMYczec4zJXjiSb-BDQ0osh@[84.150.109.75]) by fwd32.aul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1IRu2H-0G1VhY0; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:19:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.juergendankoweit.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.juergendankoweit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9164120A4 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:19:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at juergendankoweit.net Received: from mail.juergendankoweit.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.juergendankoweit.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skunlWgwgtKw for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:19:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from primergy470.juergendankoweit.net (primergy470.juergendankoweit.net [192.168.1.1]) by mail.juergendankoweit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27B61209B for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:19:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen.Dankoweit@t-online.de (Juergen Dankoweit) To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: FreeBSD-Onkel Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:19:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1188757175.37114.8.camel@primergy470.juergendankoweit.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: XRwWf6ZfYeHVtFFNbmgJ6pGV5j6QK6MXMYczec4zJXjiSb-BDQ0osh X-TOI-MSGID: 66619ca6-ebf3-4eca-a581-725be3e9828c Subject: Was: Possible solution for LSI chip problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen.Dankoweit@FreeBSD-Onkel.de List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 18:19:15 -0000 Hello to the list and to the people who are responsible for SCSI in FreeBSD. On Aug, 3rd and Aug, 12th 2007 I showed a possible solution for the LSI problems on several machines. I never heard something about that. So my final question: is it interesting to include it in that sym-driver or not. If not, why not. Best regards J.Dankoweit From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 3 11:08:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E016A417 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFF913C46C for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l83B8adW079192 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:08:36 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l83B8YM7079188 for freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:08:34 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 11:08:34 GMT Message-Id: <200709031108.l83B8YM7079188@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:08:37 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/39388 scsi ncr/sym drivers fail with 53c810 and more than 256MB m o kern/40895 scsi wierd kernel / device driver bug o kern/52638 scsi [panic] SCSI U320 on SMP server won't run faster than s kern/57398 scsi [mly] Current fails to install on mly(4) based RAID di o kern/60598 scsi wire down of scsi devices conflicts with config o kern/60641 scsi [sym] Sporadic SCSI bus resets with 53C810 under load s kern/61165 scsi [panic] kernel page fault after calling cam_send_ccb o kern/74627 scsi [ahc] [hang] Adaptec 2940U2W Can't boot 5.3 o kern/81887 scsi [aac] Adaptec SCSI 2130S aac0: GetDeviceProbeInfo comm o kern/90282 scsi [sym] SCSI bus resets cause loss of ch device o kern/92798 scsi [ahc] SCSI problem with timeouts o kern/93128 scsi [sym] FreeBSD 6.1 BETA 1 has problems with Symbios/LSI o kern/94838 scsi Kernel panic while mounting SD card with lock switch o o kern/99954 scsi [ahc] reading from DVD failes on 6.x (regression) o kern/110847 scsi [ahd] Tyan U320 onboard problem with more than 3 disks 15 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/23314 scsi [aic] aic driver fails to detect Adaptec 1520B unless o kern/35234 scsi World access to /dev/pass? (for scanner) requires acce o kern/38828 scsi [feature request] DPT PM2012B/90 doesn't work o kern/44587 scsi dev/dpt/dpt.h is missing defines required for DPT_HAND o kern/76178 scsi [ahd] Problem with ahd and large SCSI Raid system o kern/114597 scsi [sym] System hangs at SCSI bus reset with dual HBAs 6 problems total. From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 8 08:15:45 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155ED16A418 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 621C813C469 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 08:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Sep 2007 07:49:03 -0000 Received: from f049174024.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO m2a2.dyndns.org) [78.49.174.24] by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 08 Sep 2007 09:49:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19gsqFc2gNgdv6QG0cBti4KevBEGRCLvl1AOMiUHP L826qvLH40MNM3 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E982017A9; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:49:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at emma.line.org Received: from m2a2.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (m2a2.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TRTrmLzbI3UJ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:49:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by merlin.emma.line.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id D5BEE2017AA; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:49:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Matthias Andree To: Juergen.Dankoweit@FreeBSD-Onkel.de In-Reply-To: <1188757175.37114.8.camel@primergy470.juergendankoweit.net> (Juergen Dankoweit's message of "Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:19:35 +0200") References: <1188757175.37114.8.camel@primergy470.juergendankoweit.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-PGP-Key: http://home.pages.de/~mandree/keys/GPGKEY.asc Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:49:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Was: Possible solution for LSI chip problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:15:45 -0000 Juergen.Dankoweit@t-online.de (Juergen Dankoweit) writes: > On Aug, 3rd and Aug, 12th 2007 I showed a possible solution for the LSI > problems on several machines. I never heard something about that. So my > final question: is it interesting to include it in that sym-driver or > not. If not, why not. How about (1) you asked the maintainer directly and (2) considered that it's (been) vacation time and people often have to look through HUGE PILES of real-life work when returning? -- Matthias Andree