From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 01:20:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F51A16A41F; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7714A13C457; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F461A3C1A; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CAD511D0; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:20:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 729CCBE98; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:20:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 21:20:13 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Marcus Kaatari Message-ID: <20070617012013.GA32410@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <6f50eac40706151829g64b8a8abg798f97449c05888f@mail.gmail.com> <20070616030328.GA17075@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070616201921.GA29173@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070616205234.GN2268@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20070616222413.GA29804@rot13.obsecurity.org> <94e0cac00706161602r2c5a6e56if7c714b0341cec4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94e0cac00706161602r2c5a6e56if7c714b0341cec4@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 01:20:14 -0000 On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 01:02:05AM +0200, Marcus Kaatari wrote: > On 17/06/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 11:52:34PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:19:21PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 12:21:42PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:38:29AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> > > >> Indigo 23 wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> the ports? (I already know that it does require a recompilation > >of > >> > > >>> world and the kernel). > >> > > >> AFAIK nobody has succeeded in this (i.e. upgrading i386 to amd64 > >via > >> > > >> buildkernel/world) on-line far enough to tell the tale. You might > >be the > >> > > >> first :) > >> > > > > >> > > > Nah, I've done it several times. > >> > > > >> > > That's good news. Are there any particular problems in the process or > >> > > does it "just work"? > >> > > >> > I may have had to use the statically linked /rescue to do some things, > >> > I don't remember. It's not completely trivial, but someone who knows > >> > their way around a FreeBSD system can do it. > >> We did it by using miniroot on swap partition of the system disk. > >> This approach has an advantage of keeping at least one good bootable > >> base system installation in any moment. Also, it allows move in both > >> directions, i.e. i386 <-> amd64. > > > >Yeah, that's a neat trick to remember. Another trick for doing > >i386->amd64 is to install your new world into a DESTDIR, tar it up, > >put the tarball onto the root filesystem, boot the new amd64 kernel > >into single-user mode and use /rescue/tar to spam the amd64 tarball > >over the i386 world. > > > >Kris > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > That is quite interesting, but, let's say 'world' would be quite large > (although I know it's not all that huge..), isn't there a limit to how > much data tar can handle? I believe myself to have encountered such a > limit, at least with GNU tar on a Linux system.. Maybe there is a limit on the order of terabytes or higher, but in practise it's not something to worry about. Linux has had issues with 2GB file size limits in various utilities even in recent years, but AFAIK FreeBSD has not had issues for more than a decade. World is only 100-200MB depending on architecture anyway. Kris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 10:04:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279A016A469 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:04:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B447513C480 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5HA41gH019848; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:04:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 871EDB873; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:04:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:04:01 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Indigo 23 Message-ID: <20070617100401.GA48338@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Indigo 23 , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <6f50eac40706161521r2b524263la2385138f67e10bc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f50eac40706161521r2b524263la2385138f67e10bc@mail.gmail.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:04:05 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:21:40PM -0400, Indigo 23 wrote: > Does anyone think that its worth the hassle? If you do manage to get > it up and running, will you see any noticeable advantages or is it > better to just stick with i386? The only caveat that I can see is a > recompilation of all the ports. Any thoughts? You don't really _need_ it unless you've got more than four gigs of RAM and are routinely running out of memory on i386. Then again, I installed amd64 instead of i386 because I could. :-) No regrets so far. Some stuff like binary drivers, flash player, is not available on amd64 (not necessarily a bad thing :-). I think i386 has more ports available as packages. Amd 64 will use some more disk space and RAM. Doing a clean reinstall instead of an upgrade will probably less of a hassl= e. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGdQcREnfvsMMhpyURAoZ0AJ4o6wWgRTSTfXBn7KcTN9DrUscy6ACfR2aa LwV3s+A9FzsQm7smlldea7M= =wlpy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 10:57:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A031F16A41F; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6D313C48C; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:57:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC6E1A3C1A; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 03:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF051513E1; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:57:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B299BC283; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:57:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 06:57:29 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Indigo 23 , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070617105729.GA41789@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <6f50eac40706161521r2b524263la2385138f67e10bc@mail.gmail.com> <20070617100401.GA48338@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070617100401.GA48338@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:57:32 -0000 On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:21:40PM -0400, Indigo 23 wrote: > > Does anyone think that its worth the hassle? If you do manage to get > > it up and running, will you see any noticeable advantages or is it > > better to just stick with i386? The only caveat that I can see is a > > recompilation of all the ports. Any thoughts? > > You don't really _need_ it unless you've got more than four gigs of RAM > and are routinely running out of memory on i386. Then again, I installed > amd64 instead of i386 because I could. :-) No regrets so far. s/'ve got more than four gigs of RAM and//. Regardless of amount of RAM, lack of virtual address space on i386 is crippling for certain uses, for example ZFS. > Some stuff like binary drivers, flash player, is not available on > amd64 (not necessarily a bad thing :-). I think i386 has more ports > available as packages. > > Amd 64 will use some more disk space and RAM. Certain CPU-intensive applications will be faster when compiled for amd64 (because of e.g. more registers being available). Other applications may be slower because of increased time required to copy 64-bit pointers compared to 32-bit. There are other architectural differences (e.g. 4 levels of page tables) that may also cause different performance characteristics, plus and minus. It all depends on your workload, so you have to test it and see. Kris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 12:21:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092DF16A400 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C008813C448 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.schuh@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so323019anc for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:21:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AmiqUyY0sDPpXk6UduMe02irVsnhrVJFY5zHMEa2C7Mu9T8uszDeDDRX5oRGBZA/gNV/4YXqPrIkkyLFpmrm0ecxcVB8kMuqyKIGKI2CbdDQ1SrzDZ4PO5en4cv/OrSdVHsNIFY52/jmm0lQ5Sj7oDjGOmQ6Y9zRSDx/gZBq3OU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Ak8ncSnyunfWl54wg+rPWFe8Q/UFxDWroPuwa+W/UZAhil2w1GiKZMcbBoKL6TsOYE5J7i3vu5F4ESdioxSrAWB+LjpqRndOsDKapG5EOshpyBBCQiYYxJyp9jPRs8VkWydVbAZRPQ4xp/574Hllab+VYKfrlgrDwg5VzUomEA8= Received: by 10.100.195.10 with SMTP id s10mr2861715anf.1182082887244; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.125.11 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1dbad3150706170521m6e4272e8nb31c74e170a5b4f8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:21:27 +0200 From: "Michael Schuh" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:21:28 -0000 Hi, i have another Way that might be good, also for remote take over. You know Colin's depenguinator? I have made my own new depenguinator, that could install a complete base-system by building it on another box. Anyone interested? I have written an Howto, that is at the time not online. cheers michael From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 14:59:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0D116A468; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com) Received: from mindcrime.bit0.com (bit0.com [207.246.88.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF50213C455; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.bit0.com [127.0.0.1]) by mindcrime.bit0.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559D9730024; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:43:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bit0.com Received: from mindcrime.bit0.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mindcrime.bit0.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b+iPZLDaGgld; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.bit0.com [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mindcrime.bit0.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 10:43:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Andrews To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20070616222413.GA29804@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20070617104023.V50590@bit0.com> References: <6f50eac40706151829g64b8a8abg798f97449c05888f@mail.gmail.com> <20070616030328.GA17075@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070616201921.GA29173@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070616205234.GN2268@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20070616222413.GA29804@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kostik Belousov , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to amd64 requires recompilation of ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:59:21 -0000 On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> I may have had to use the statically linked /rescue to do some things, >>> I don't remember. It's not completely trivial, but someone who knows >>> their way around a FreeBSD system can do it. >> We did it by using miniroot on swap partition of the system disk. >> This approach has an advantage of keeping at least one good bootable >> base system installation in any moment. Also, it allows move in both >> directions, i.e. i386 <-> amd64. > > Yeah, that's a neat trick to remember. Another trick for doing > i386->amd64 is to install your new world into a DESTDIR, tar it up, > put the tarball onto the root filesystem, boot the new amd64 kernel > into single-user mode and use /rescue/tar to spam the amd64 tarball > over the i386 world. I've used the miniroot-on-swap approach before. Another trick I used this week (when I had to do four i386->amd64 migrations) was to build a netbootable amd64 system, PXE-boot that, and then installworld to the local disks that way. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 22:52:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E854B16A41F for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D44613C45A for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 32439 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2007 22:26:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LWtsZE91fLUh60JSkFacuL0dZuABAAN5i6AGApmqLLnrluy1V4XVEzBJaP6YQoOLkzwWfU9glvOE6rzRjv+5ih/FN4WkOsHCWDqfTbUJUXdN06ud2NZrJefbtHVVyEyngJBDqV1Hg/CSSrRZ2luXMovUad+i7Kg7cAbugXXS1sQ= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.165?) (mikej@rogers.com@99.244.15.156 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jun 2007 22:26:05 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: _R0T7vIVM1neGrqv5WCwZfZ_SAP6cUllx3gG1Kb_LkCQVM1fSepVt3Wcykt4LTouEg-- Message-ID: <4675B46A.100@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:23:38 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Buildkernel error in acpi_hpet.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:52:48 -0000 cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../contrib/dev/acpica -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_ec.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../contrib/dev/acpica -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c: In function `acpi_hpet_table_probe': /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: error: `ACPI_TABLE_HPET' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: error: for each function it appears in.) /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:89: error: `hpet' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:96: error: `ACPI_SIG_HPET' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:96: warning: passing arg 3 of `AcpiGetTable' from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi/../../../dev/acpica/acpi_hpet.c:104: error: syntax error before ')' token *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi. *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 00:11:05 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C802016A468 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F56513C480 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.0.0.222] (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l5I0B1H7006495; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:11:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4675CD95.9040004@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:11:01 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robin Gruyters References: <20070601114047.z6qgi686os4ogw4o@server.yirdis.nl> <46658EEB.5000008@freebsd.org> <20070606084406.8v6nkbtv9csgs880@server.yirdis.nl> <200706061715.06603.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20070606095820.83tast6s0804osos@server.yirdis.nl> <46679117.5060909@freebsd.org> <20070607153845.24h3nl968skg4scc@server.yirdis.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070607153845.24h3nl968skg4scc@server.yirdis.nl> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050302020900060504030805" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Listing tar archives from tape (was Re: Unrecognized archive format with RELENG_6_2 and RELENG_6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:11:05 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050302020900060504030805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> After that I try to read/list the tar from tape with tar -t: >> $ sudo tar -tf /dev/sa0 >> archive.dmp >> tar: Unrecognized archive format: Inappropriate file type or format >> >> But when I extract the archive from tape, it works perfectly: >> $ sudo tar -xvf /dev/sa0 Please try the most recent -STABLE version of libarchive and bsdtar, with the attached patch. This simply disables the skip optimization when reading archives from character or block devices. Tim Kientzle --------------050302020900060504030805 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="libarchive_tape_drive_fix.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="libarchive_tape_drive_fix.patch" Index: archive_read_open_filename.c =================================================================== --- archive_read_open_filename.c (revision 124) +++ archive_read_open_filename.c (working copy) @@ -165,6 +165,15 @@ struct read_file_data *mine = (struct read_file_data *)client_data; off_t old_offset, new_offset; + /* + * Workaround for broken tape interfaces that don't support + * seek(), but return success if you ask them to seek(). This + * also, of course, slows down archive scanning significantly + * on devices that can seek. Yuck. + */ + if (S_ISCHR(mine->st_mode) || S_ISBLK(mine->st_mode)) + return (0); + /* Reduce request to the next smallest multiple of block_size */ request = (request / mine->block_size) * mine->block_size; /* --------------050302020900060504030805-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 01:37:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3F116A400 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7B4513C43E for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 2122 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 01:37:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nf6Sl/knpLLXWXOdLddJgReYlqlsN/kcH7jcJzUHfh9t5MCBjDL3ZrBt6HIjseS+v8JNou0zwoQLrGHdn+ERMAIY++qCum0IazWx7re4hL+qhcSi9/WFv4p+orMRp2V0cIfmYcvMtMBGmUNv0lgoW9Ood+DSJ1oZYqcORiTFnp0= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.165?) (mikej@rogers.com@99.244.15.156 with plain) by smtp101.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2007 01:37:23 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 3IMlUdcVM1kLaEE2q3TQiefWPCTuAOY4GwkD9gxNtEIzw93MI5OXxbAVvwRfDYPtpw-- Message-ID: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:34:55 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kmacy@freebsd.org Subject: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:37:24 -0000 mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mc5.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc7323.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_ael1002.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mv88e1xxx.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_xgmac.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_t3_hw.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_lro.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_l2t.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/sys/uipc_mvec.c if_cxgb.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c:34:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_ael1002.c:34:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mv88e1xxx.c:34:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_xgmac.c:35:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_t3_hw.c:35:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c:76:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c:62:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c:178:3: #error "SGE_NUM_GENBITS must be 1 or 2" /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_lro.c:53:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.c:58:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_l2t.c:53:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/sys/uipc_mvec.c:45:26: cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb. *** Error code 1 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 01:51:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4B916A46D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7931113C487 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1425261uge for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j0TSXI7cihqJa0r+vnQWZWdfiR+s6UFDkIZ4Ftz4jXhszOAsOIVxbTp3DmfrkqtwUdahTBDCoij3A9fBArqeYVwgARqgRVl36YhybEYL5KB3OAUKFlJ7hAdJlgwUGCcYw4bafFBKMO4xKHOJJvMDQWRTojvRya8FHtjYsBKowhA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Me3aTIeqC7K2X4jZV8brJ8bKOyzSh67vu7NxlrtOpKSyi1TEEcJGl4GzCuVgF7hBwyy3xQq8AK3nQjc47nn6bIFfmGqVUU1AIxPsP5J5lrJLzjnEi0fJyJj8ZCZQHw9WU2f/roCPA2c6I0drn6gWDz0ab4J+HLPTpYx3P5sz03s= Received: by 10.78.170.17 with SMTP id s17mr2066876hue.1182131481146; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.162.18 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:51:21 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Mike Jakubik" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> Cc: Subject: Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:51:23 -0000 Oops - thanks. On 6/17/07, Mike Jakubik wrote: > mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -DDEFAULT_JUMBO > -DCONFIG_DEFINED -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS > -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mc5.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc7323.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_ael1002.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mv88e1xxx.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_xgmac.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_t3_hw.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_lro.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_l2t.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/sys/uipc_mvec.c if_cxgb.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c:34:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_ael1002.c:34:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mv88e1xxx.c:34:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_xgmac.c:35:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_t3_hw.c:35:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c:76:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c:62:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c:178:3: #error > "SGE_NUM_GENBITS must be 1 or 2" > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_lro.c:53:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.c:58:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_l2t.c:53:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/sys/uipc_mvec.c:45:26: > cxgb_include.h: No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb. > *** Error code 1 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 01:59:30 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465E16A46B for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57C8F13C48A for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:59:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 1886 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 01:59:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=NJyg8GvMCgtSLkU4Kx8V6kLV3yWpXNqj6lKJdc8kNYV7pCyaNJ66+/26uBY/0PkCujB5BPyUy2xMrMoZPCLTfEM7VoTN8vwRzk4QBpWiN2/MH1uCOgyyDrCSwG00lW6TrrAyz0SsGlSly+8BLcvm6Tk406iAkIDyAsCqOXaQJYU= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.165?) (mikej@rogers.com@99.244.15.156 with plain) by smtp100.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2007 01:59:29 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: oPh.wBMVM1m.91SUMUZHKvOGa7KJxV24kKsrkK9XBqpess9ozPWK1gLHzquQeMNidg-- Message-ID: <4675E66E.10600@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:57:02 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kip Macy References: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:59:30 -0000 Kip Macy wrote: > Oops - thanks. I've included the file from cvs on my box, however i now get this error while compiling. --- cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -g -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mc5.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -g -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -Werror -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c In file included from /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_include.h:10, from /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c:34: /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.h:83: warning: "struct l2t_entry" declared inside parameter list /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.h:83: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb. --- I then noticed that the contents of that file are all commented out, so i tried uncommenting but it fails during the depend stage. --- mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mc5.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc7323.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_ael1002.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mv88e1xxx.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_xgmac.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_t3_hw.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_lro.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_l2t.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/sys/uipc_mvec.c if_cxgb.c /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c:178:3: #error "SGE_NUM_GENBITS must be 1 or 2" mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb. --- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 04:42:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ABCB16A421 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F8F13C448 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1445597uge for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:42:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nrOnB5sjSm7YYu+/GxVgQ14Bs7e/zP3jcHCD6/l3v/6GCFE9Ye9++n51LUmcs0krEJijr9aCJ1c0kRQkTd0id2a1gXvVM1cBtSZhZMWcE72h7w6gEzm6lFMx2UZVNhafW7Qab5qcOTKK2h/liQiAs94NPyqw1o9SzPqvtD17bQw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ElgVzIQ+OW3NXpT3BsuRR9I9eZ+tZ69+98W7nbj3vunGqPdFG+3cnMvXtGjdaN5p/0xNwRI5vY6AtLN7ls34Fhz89jR65oNs7ot+r2eoFGCky1cOhUbDMm32/ffU4gc038SuKlUJyRJg7XH5fGgntNMi9JRIsilcINNerAg1AXs= Received: by 10.78.170.6 with SMTP id s6mr2093771hue.1182141771121; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.162.18 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:42:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:42:51 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Mike Jakubik" In-Reply-To: <4675E66E.10600@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> <4675E66E.10600@rogers.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:42:53 -0000 I don't know. I just deleted dev/cxgb and recreated it from cvs and LINT builds for me. -Kip On 6/17/07, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Kip Macy wrote: > > Oops - thanks. > > I've included the file from cvs on my box, however i now get this error > while compiling. > > --- > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott > -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -g -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -Werror > -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS > -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ > -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mc5.c > cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott > -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -g -DDEFAULT_JUMBO -DCONFIG_DEFINED -Werror > -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS > -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER/opt_global.h -I. -I@ > -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -finline-limit=8000 -fno-common > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER -mno-align-long-strings > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c > In file included from > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_include.h:10, > from > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c:34: > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.h:83: warning: > "struct l2t_entry" declared inside parameter list > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.h:83: warning: its > scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what > you want > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb. > --- > > I then noticed that the contents of that file are all commented out, so > i tried uncommenting but it fails during the depend stage. > > --- > mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -DCONFIG_CHELSIO_T3_CORE -DDEFAULT_JUMBO > -DCONFIG_DEFINED -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- > -I/usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS > -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPAMTOASTER > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mc5.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc8211.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_vsc7323.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_ael1002.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_mv88e1xxx.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_xgmac.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/common/cxgb_t3_hw.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_main.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_lro.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_offload.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_l2t.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/sys/uipc_mvec.c if_cxgb.c > /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb/../../dev/cxgb/cxgb_sge.c:178:3: #error > "SGE_NUM_GENBITS must be 1 or 2" > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/cxgb. > --- > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 05:15:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BE516A421 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9212213C468 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 97100 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 05:15:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UtoGguNb6oqLTkbc8mTZFuZ8ALFbqvUWpIeyrUkBT8WvLoncuFFA3SMHW8JGgA2Osz6VFRF8GHkzULkQnZQCkD1i/5wsgmCx1tM8iDvX/OgwmoMEsYbe2MvmMXPF4yk5RtqpUAUWDnRoV5HE+ojhoi/AyyKwqBtSXVKetgTA+7U= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.165?) (mikej@rogers.com@99.244.15.156 with plain) by smtp108.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2007 05:15:47 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: dBnj.lwVM1kE4xrsCfaX68jSrLOIiylPszYkFWOSXoAT39Xekxyva7uzFvKK0W4uOw-- Message-ID: <46761470.7010900@rogers.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:13:20 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kip Macy References: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> <4675E66E.10600@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:15:49 -0000 Kip Macy wrote: > I don't know. I just deleted dev/cxgb and recreated it from cvs and > LINT builds for me. Re-cvsupped your version from RELENG_6 and all is well now. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 05:18:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA3116A421 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD7C13C46C for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1450144uge for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:18:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PWx80jX0dF+kOk3sa40xrVaI3kCMpEsOw+9pWyCDIJkM4nhOZs/Q8dfEypWk9xEpwS/HEOdcnoSsFkS3T6OSy0t4uMuYEr//9CH5ulQNSgHkEVkdvVlElrB5ak14RrtdsQJ4jcHi7ft4uR/fbTVZjzj0c5eTavDtrUsApfA06pM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lv64PsakLOFsNQEUceVMBb6C8S/oMXAD7to2KxBOJYic1N36EDDWNqF17dI9YCPyYZnpKoqexwNlTKz1zKmHuZJFXSVxvW/JpY9GpVr7EVnlDoegVVsAG6VKbqLHeaE5M3y96jMhH3T6PIOtpCFwdvUnYhrX55drha1ZhT2Osuw= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr2107226hue.1182143909447; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.162.18 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:18:29 -0700 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Mike Jakubik" In-Reply-To: <46761470.7010900@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4675E13F.7040706@rogers.com> <4675E66E.10600@rogers.com> <46761470.7010900@rogers.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cxgb mfc is missing cxgb_include.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 05:18:31 -0000 On 6/17/07, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Kip Macy wrote: > > I don't know. I just deleted dev/cxgb and recreated it from cvs and > > LINT builds for me. > > Re-cvsupped your version from RELENG_6 and all is well now. Good to hear. Thanks. -Kip From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 11:56:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8EF16A421 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:56:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buganini@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120B513C455 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buganini@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so375738anc for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:56:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=M8ry1S/NV+cQcBj7UnpSxKk5msWw3zplEGC69vkjxZlMtCJD4CZEZg1Y2vTdU+qujI6b++TdK7MBCbaDTekPcTDjmLs3cP8zHUFI8XDssacwXJlW79sxO/1M2+VuwMfbN17fc2xiNqd47UP0X+oC9EhrO+g8bE+EBWBi5krKRec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=QGcG9YiTS5d5E82H+vTl9AsHE3IcRvKig0AGVcHo/EJXhNgROQWyeT1XqPsxQbFeuix/G370bvEtvp/9m/T05XED1fQOFpIfk0E+ocwDJrcioOcWQN5XIqk7Zzoues4jYTBWmDACUDntFj92IHNbYOEp6neXJCo5/w5JPY/PcNU= Received: by 10.100.42.7 with SMTP id p7mr1152776anp.1182166093543; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.151.5 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:28:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:28:13 +0800 From: Buganini To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: buildkernel error about mmd/sd driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:56:14 -0000 I add these lines in my kernel config file: device mmcsd device mmc then I got: cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../dev/ath -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../dev/mmc/mmc.c awk -f ../../../tools/makeobjops.awk ../../../dev/mmc/mmcbr_if.m -c awk -f ../../../tools/makeobjops.awk ../../../dev/mmc/mmcbr_if.m -c ; cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf -I../../../dev/ath -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -ffreestanding -Werror mmcbr_if.c In file included from mmcbr_if.c:20: ./mmcbr_if.h:20: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:20: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h:22: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:23: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h: In function `MMCBR_UPDATE_IOS': ./mmcbr_if.h:25: error: `brdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h:25: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ./mmcbr_if.h:25: error: for each function it appears in.) ./mmcbr_if.h:26: error: `reqdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h: At top level: ./mmcbr_if.h:32: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:33: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h:35: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:37: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h: In function `MMCBR_REQUEST': ./mmcbr_if.h:39: error: `brdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h:40: error: `reqdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h:40: error: `req' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h: At top level: ./mmcbr_if.h:46: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:46: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h:48: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:49: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h: In function `MMCBR_GET_RO': ./mmcbr_if.h:51: error: `brdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h:52: error: `reqdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h: At top level: ./mmcbr_if.h:58: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:58: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h:60: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:61: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h: In function `MMCBR_ACQUIRE_HOST': ./mmcbr_if.h:63: error: `brdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h:64: error: `reqdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h: At top level: ./mmcbr_if.h:70: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:70: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h:72: error: syntax error before "brdev" ./mmcbr_if.h:73: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ./mmcbr_if.h: In function `MMCBR_RELEASE_HOST': ./mmcbr_if.h:75: error: `brdev' undeclared (first use in this function) ./mmcbr_if.h:76: error: `reqdev' undeclared (first use in this function) *** Error code 1 -- Oops From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 14:05:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110DD16A421 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smainv@yahoo.com) Received: from web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C10C13C45E for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smainv@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 7063 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Jun 2007 13:38:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=pcsJDkE/JXC5t8zIUT+u6eB2Y9/2s0a5whac1ZozIQrhAd9eq++pY5f7NxjyEbPBiipt7+zgKktupZ8/EAbmSzZm1nme1STUOsSii8HpXZSK1FJyAhICnq+2/pNie1EAQ+U0Mk+MwKZByz9lFqKw1iogNP6jFD+8kZaBQreRi8o=; X-YMail-OSG: .TOr2hYVM1kWzrZskUOf_E47wy2sDM_Q9gf8uKji5vIxPlLwvaitDhtTRwwi.Y6TNlzky_ypRlEsZzcxPPZPx.nJSQdTAYR_17f237cYOTP39AtK9OEN0C345_Pm93_J9jbbHYxgbi3vlgILtJd3ayxV Received: from [193.33.92.3] by web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 06:38:31 PDT Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 06:38:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Vladislav Storojenco To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: deinstall ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:05:13 -0000 Hello all, I'm new user in FreeBSD and have a question about ports.. If a port is depend on others ports, during the deinstall it will deinstall and all dependencies? Many Thanks Best regards "The only fear we have to feat its fear itself". ____________________________________________________________________________________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 14:15:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC7516A400 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@helenmarks.co.uk) Received: from mail.goodforbusiness.co.uk (mail.goodforbusiness.co.uk [81.19.179.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62D913C455 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@helenmarks.co.uk) Received: from latham.london.helenmarks.co.uk (unknown [192.168.100.1]) by mail.goodforbusiness.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94611478; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:15:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.helenmarks.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by latham.london.helenmarks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96B2E041B; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:15:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from 195.12.22.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dom@helenmarks.co.uk) by mail.helenmarks.co.uk with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:15:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <54537.195.12.22.194.1182176146.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:15:46 +0100 (BST) From: "Dominic Marks" To: "Vladislav Storojenco" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deinstall ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:15:49 -0000 Vladislav Storojenco wrote: > Hello all, > I'm new user in FreeBSD and have a question about > ports.. > If a port is depend on others ports, during the > deinstall it will deinstall and all dependencies? It depends on what command you issue. If you try and remove an installed package which had other packages dependent upon it, then it will fail. # pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/apache-2.2.4_2/ pkg_delete: package 'apache-2.2.4_2' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled: php5-5.2.1_3 php5-mysql-5.2.1_3 php5-pcre-5.2.1_5 php5-posix-5.2.1_3 php5-session-5.2.1_3 php5-simplexml-5.2.1_3 ... But you could force it by using `pkg_delete -f` if you wanted. This on its own will not remove the dependancies, you need to use `pkg_delete -rf` for that. If you run `make deinstall` from the port directory you get the same result as having used `pkg_delete -f` (but not -rf). Dominic From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 14:34:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277F016A469 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:34:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from dd15624.kasserver.com (dd15624.kasserver.com [85.13.136.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2999813C44C for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@chillt.de) Received: from hundertwasser.cs.tcd.ie (dslb-084-060-120-230.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.60.120.230]) by dd15624.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395A61817296B; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:07:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <467691EA.8010006@chillt.de> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 15:08:42 +0100 From: Bartosz Fabianowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladislav Storojenco References: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deinstall ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 14:34:12 -0000 > If a port is depend on others ports, during the > deinstall it will deinstall and all dependencies? No. Only the one port you specify will be deinstalled. If you want to remove dependencies that are no longer needed, use ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves. - Bartosz From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 22:11:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813D616A46C for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigo@liralink.com) Received: from bloco-11.gmail.comdominio.com.br (bloco-11.gmail.comdominio.com.br [200.155.11.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E7E13C45D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:11:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodrigo@liralink.com) Received: (qmail 17188 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2007 21:43:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO OsvaldoVieirPC) (Authenticatedgmail:rodrigo@liralink.com@[217.168.120.232]) (envelope-sender ) by bloco-11.gmail.comdominio.com.br (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Jun 2007 21:43:23 -0000 From: "Rodrigo Galiano" To: "'Dominic Marks'" , "'Vladislav Storojenco'" References: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <54537.195.12.22.194.1182176146.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <54537.195.12.22.194.1182176146.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:44:04 -0800 Organization: GALICOM Message-ID: <007e01c7b23d$46ce41a0$d46ac4e0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acexs4Ad/4pgEt5wQPKIthZKbMmU9gAiNg9Q Content-Language: pt x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AWNI FRfw HoeF KmP1 NiOH O51P O7R1 QYHK TMTx UXPS ZO+R aCi/ c13N gQEL hlUg iR1w; 3; ZABvAG0AQABoAGUAbABlAG4AbQBhAHIAawBzAC4AYwBvAC4AdQBrADsAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAtAHMAdABhAGIAbABlAEAAZgByAGUAZQBiAHMAZAAuAG8AcgBnADsAcwBtAGEAaQBuAHYAQAB5AGEAaABvAG8ALgBjAG8AbQA=; Sosha1_v1; 7; {BD58DA49-410D-4E27-9B8E-2F73E34056A9}; cgBvAGQAcgBpAGcAbwBAAGwAaQByAGEAbABpAG4AawAuAGMAbwBtAA==; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:42:31 GMT; UgBFADoAIABkAGUAaQBuAHMAdABhAGwAbAAgAHAAbwByAHQAcwA= x-cr-puzzleid: {BD58DA49-410D-4E27-9B8E-2F73E34056A9} Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: deinstall ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rodrigo@liralink.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:11:21 -0000 No, if you make 'deinstall' under a specific port it will only uninstall the software package with the dependencies. If you want to deinstall dependencies do the command 'make clean' to check out what will be actually installed and diff the output with the results obtained with the 'pkg_info' command. Then finally do the command 'pkg_delete #package_name#' to deinstall the dependencies. Regards -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dominic Marks Sent: segunda-feira, 18 de Junho de 2007 06:16 To: Vladislav Storojenco Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: deinstall ports Vladislav Storojenco wrote: > Hello all, > I'm new user in FreeBSD and have a question about > ports.. > If a port is depend on others ports, during the > deinstall it will deinstall and all dependencies? It depends on what command you issue. If you try and remove an installed package which had other packages dependent upon it, then it will fail. # pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/apache-2.2.4_2/ pkg_delete: package 'apache-2.2.4_2' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled: php5-5.2.1_3 php5-mysql-5.2.1_3 php5-pcre-5.2.1_5 php5-posix-5.2.1_3 php5-session-5.2.1_3 php5-simplexml-5.2.1_3 ... But you could force it by using `pkg_delete -f` if you wanted. This on its own will not remove the dependancies, you need to use `pkg_delete -rf` for that. If you run `make deinstall` from the port directory you get the same result as having used `pkg_delete -f` (but not -rf). Dominic _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 18 23:52:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0573116A41F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9811213C483 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 32466 invoked by uid 399); 18 Jun 2007 23:52:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.5?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jun 2007 23:52:51 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <46771AD0.2050908@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:52:48 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (Windows/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rodrigo@liralink.com References: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <54537.195.12.22.194.1182176146.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> <007e01c7b23d$46ce41a0$d46ac4e0$@com> In-Reply-To: <007e01c7b23d$46ce41a0$d46ac4e0$@com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, 'Dominic Marks' , 'Vladislav Storojenco' Subject: Re: deinstall ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:52:52 -0000 ports-mgmt/portmaster has some features that might be interesting here. One is the -e (expunge) feature that will delete a port for you, and offer to delete all its distfiles. The other is the -s (stale) option that will look through /var/db/pkg to find any ports that were installed as a dependency but no longer needed. You might also be interested in the -l feature that classifies your installed ports into those that have dependencies, are depended on, etc. If you find a "leaf" port that is no longer needed, you can use the -e feature which will then call the -s feature to help you keep things clean. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 05:46:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B34716A400 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D58313C457 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b14so2363464qbc for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:46:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jglhqsnfpQuqv98cg60H/O8jSxb7pjSN9yDcr7tkOyt3NY6Nh37Nw0fjOkWpoMgA7H09taVqOXhQTbtR+K6Rn11rHV1OZyFzqZKXm51CQIvhnh/zcnAnpQFT+bP9VYuyNljhb1U9g0/JzRAwkrP1eym+MlipWsQlvdZyDYAf7f4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=PeC2I5Xs6HL3aYE67jnT1wESl01PloajVL4HulHsn3UPSGI2uXYXHARrG/DLcIyjJ0zf9I9pIzqe6+8TZ47lmfTKhsu/ch2FeAZCId/1mTQDGKythE3UD92avDreKccjVmyfFyfx0UR1/O+aTvpeol8JltJ/QGNbcAdWMeJkmgU= Received: by 10.65.159.3 with SMTP id l3mr10783676qbo.1182231980472; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.196.20 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:46:20 +0800 From: "Rong-en Fan" To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 05:46:21 -0000 I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. Is this still the case? Regards, Rong-En Fan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 06:24:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B565716A421 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D5F13C455 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:24:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D2C811B; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:24:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [192.168.2.1]) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0195341C00; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:26:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 01:24:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1729392.jKB6uXWQCB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Rong-en Fan Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:24:41 -0000 --nextPart1729392.jKB6uXWQCB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote: > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > Is this still the case? > > Regards, > Rong-En Fan I've been using r/w nullfs in production for ages without issue...sure=20 you're not confusing nullfs with unionfs? =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel --nextPart1729392.jKB6uXWQCB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGd3amJvkB8SevrssRAkW8AJ9owjX+J5Ajbq0zX5hgBjH675w7bwCfbZAM EqlcfdJUTtAjT5xRMDVREwg= =orzm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1729392.jKB6uXWQCB-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 06:39:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181D516A421 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:39:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C929E13C44C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b14so2381897qbc for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:39:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=P4SGA5Hi5bO6esN4NJDFG3fzBqv0sgiEadUxZ84g9hJXXqbR3P4t5x/usHfj5mzCantw2xTxO6VIzxLFCXnqJNqadsp+0wYS/Rw6DlBGWCPJrO1PEpucCSSnrzNeiWidEeLLpr+fKY9BPGV80RQf+8J2q2Wygu4lO3b07fvtN2c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZYaN6r60wBWddfG8PKkqE39/jRkPYFtfwjrr5fBn7IeJNPlvNz39s8MuambYzkFDucnLePz7X5MmJlMMhfD/Lh29uAXuM8vLafMAqu3eX3Vby/EymOMNEVzB0gDrSfXb6recnFaUDI+Fa6xxU0O4cEXbBn0uObUu5yX1g4YNGe4= Received: by 10.65.237.15 with SMTP id o15mr10859093qbr.1182235162794; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.196.20 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:39:22 +0800 From: "Rong-en Fan" To: "Josh Paetzel" In-Reply-To: <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:39:31 -0000 On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote: > > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > > Is this still the case? > > > > Regards, > > Rong-En Fan > > I've been using r/w nullfs in production for ages without issue...sure > you're not confusing nullfs with unionfs? I'm aware that unionfs status and I think it's usable in 7.x, right? I was asking about nullfs because the following lines in sys/conf/NOTES: # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising # soul to sit down and fix them. Regards, Rong-En Fan > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 06:58:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96CC516A4CD for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:58:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D426C13C4E5 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0448D1A4D83; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [192.168.1.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD37513C6; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 502C2BE96; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:58:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 02:58:20 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rong-en Fan Message-ID: <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Josh Paetzel , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 06:58:24 -0000 --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > On 6/19/07, Josh Paetzel wrote: > >On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Rong-en Fan wrote: > >> I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > >> if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > >> My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > >> Is this still the case? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rong-En Fan > > > >I've been using r/w nullfs in production for ages without issue...sure > >you're not confusing nullfs with unionfs? >=20 > I'm aware that unionfs status and I think it's usable > in 7.x, right? >=20 > I was asking about nullfs because the following lines > in sys/conf/NOTES: >=20 > # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be > # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with > # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising > # soul to sit down and fix them. Yeah, that's almost completely stale for both 6.x and 7.x. nullfs is entirely stable, and unionfs is much better (i.e. not the instant disaster it used to be), although it still has some serious issues. I think umap was actually disconnected entirely from the kernel and module build, although the code was not removed (it should be, that's what the attic is for). portal probably has bugs since no-one uses it. Kris --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGd36MWry0BWjoQKURAleTAKD7KEmjMYJRlv412Gf+fb1BkhvSwQCgnK3D IP0Ty5igkpYa7zAGOV/oI4U= =lYRy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 07:10:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F97916A46C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B85913C484 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so2637583waf for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:10:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V3AahOPyJ6/kxRhMo8Q0DpFNi4ge4hwtzs0SG8kLmtuMgNwXBZtX5W6CGl9E/v92+YHmOU2sTJqUL2GVXFtKr8No9Hd2AzAQQQRTHjVo83a8Ud4IzXSs9/5cbMm5MEPwOfpa+8YdmeivBVaeMjRgwigAqwr7M5EXI4oQ/aJ/jPY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JUz7fUxIPW8MoXkSikoiH/sq1uyiT5pITq6W577ZhIWxNDkLbho01RgIGuLUlZE3AIw6Fk3jTqw3sWiK2ZsLF9KyekmpAebbw2zD2JEpBUvC96/awNVQ5RRTgiZcjtGhyB8gfLAbUxruRGS2+0xsEJuWfsKE2IP1vK1z5p+AGq0= Received: by 10.114.177.1 with SMTP id z1mr6980265wae.1182233596966; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.125.14 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7579f7fb0706182313j143a4798n9a55decdac9337d2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:13:16 -0700 From: "Matthew Jacob" To: "Rong-en Fan" In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:10:06 -0000 I use it all the time for compiles on top of nfs On 6/18/07, Rong-en Fan wrote: > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > Is this still the case? > > Regards, > Rong-En Fan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 08:40:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E59316A400 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@helenmarks.co.uk) Received: from mail.goodforbusiness.co.uk (mail.goodforbusiness.co.uk [81.19.179.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5645713C46E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@helenmarks.co.uk) Received: from latham.london.helenmarks.co.uk (unknown [192.168.100.1]) by mail.goodforbusiness.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D1F11478; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:40:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.helenmarks.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by latham.london.helenmarks.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B22E041B; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:40:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from 195.12.22.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dom@helenmarks.co.uk) by mail.helenmarks.co.uk with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:40:35 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <56344.195.12.22.194.1182242435.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <007e01c7b23d$46ce41a0$d46ac4e0$@com> References: <47805.6899.qm@web50009.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <54537.195.12.22.194.1182176146.squirrel@mail.helenmarks.co.uk> <007e01c7b23d$46ce41a0$d46ac4e0$@com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:40:35 +0100 (BST) From: "Dominic Marks" To: rodrigo@liralink.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, 'Dominic Marks' , 'Vladislav Storojenco' Subject: RE: deinstall ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 08:40:37 -0000 Rodrigo Galiano wrote: > No, if you make 'deinstall' under a specific port it will only uninstall > the > software package with the dependencies. If you want to deinstall > dependencies do the command 'make clean' to check out what will be > actually > installed and diff the output with the results obtained with the > 'pkg_info' > command. Then finally do the command 'pkg_delete #package_name#' to > deinstall the dependencies. I believe the original question was if removing a package would by default removes the dependencies of the package too, to which the answer is no. I don't think the intention of the original poster was to attempt to actually deinstall the dependencies. Perhaps I misread the original post. Dominic From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 11:42:53 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A2B16A469 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.m.cooper@borgsdemons.com) Received: from smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE36213C45B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.m.cooper@borgsdemons.com) Received: (qmail 18113 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2007 11:16:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO borgdemon2.hsd1.md.comcast.net) (j.m.cooper@borgsdemons.com@69.251.16.205 with login) by smtp103.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 11:16:11 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: Uj1yyf0VM1kM30yF6y1WC9Oa5ptQhsldfvlFAc_K9eObkRPGCRSgu_DMAQ5J0Mn9LJMiTJoxIex02pSBYY841w8wbiVFbdC34CLOS8xkZ_7bJY1JKKlWsNIzeZkrpkiKd7x1EqVnNSpRqHkKbSuGvjy3kw-- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by borgdemon2.hsd1.md.comcast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6405D01 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:16:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4677BAF9.2060305@borgsdemons.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:16:09 -0400 From: John Merryweather Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1pre (X11/20070521) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Stable Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010506010500090606010305" Subject: WAS: misc/113825: WARN Error in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (/usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:42:53 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010506010500090606010305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sigh . . . Here are the patches I was trying to upload when the PR was closed without mercy. :) jmc --------------010506010500090606010305 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-csup" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-csup" # Patch for misc/113825 for csup # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -c 'contrib/csup/proto.c.old' 'contrib/csup/proto.c' Index: ./contrib/csup/proto.c.old *** ./contrib/csup/proto.c.old Tue Jun 19 04:29:42 2007 --- ./contrib/csup/proto.c Tue Jun 19 05:31:31 2007 *************** *** 68,74 **** }; static void killer_start(struct killer *, struct mux *); ! static void *killer_run(void *); static void killer_stop(struct killer *); static int proto_waitconnect(int); --- 68,74 ---- }; static void killer_start(struct killer *, struct mux *); ! static void killer_run(void *); static void killer_stop(struct killer *); static int proto_waitconnect(int); *************** *** 963,968 **** --- 963,970 ---- /* Start the killer thread. It is used to protect against some signals during the multi-threaded run so that we can gracefully fail. */ + typedef void *(*start_routine)(void *); + static void killer_start(struct killer *k, struct mux *m) { *************** *** 976,988 **** sigaddset(&k->sigset, SIGTERM); sigaddset(&k->sigset, SIGPIPE); pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &k->sigset, NULL); ! error = pthread_create(&k->thread, NULL, killer_run, k); if (error) err(1, "pthread_create"); } /* The main loop of the killer thread. */ ! static void * killer_run(void *arg) { struct killer *k; --- 978,991 ---- sigaddset(&k->sigset, SIGTERM); sigaddset(&k->sigset, SIGPIPE); pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &k->sigset, NULL); ! error = pthread_create(&k->thread, NULL, (start_routine)killer_run, k); if (error) err(1, "pthread_create"); } /* The main loop of the killer thread. */ ! ! static void killer_run(void *arg) { struct killer *k; #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 06:52:53 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'contrib/csup/proto.c.old' 25477 1182245491 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 06:52:53 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 96 2948 4469 #### #### Checksum: 114 3601 58469 #### --------------010506010500090606010305 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-ggated" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-ggated" # Patch for misc/113825 for ggated # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -c 'sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old' 'sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c' Index: ./sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old *** ./sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old Mon Jun 18 23:05:16 2007 --- ./sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c Mon Jun 18 23:08:02 2007 *************** *** 756,761 **** --- 756,762 ---- error = pthread_mutex_unlock(&outqueue_mtx); assert(error == 0); } + return arg; } static void * *************** *** 810,815 **** --- 811,817 ---- } free(req); } + return arg; } static void #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 06:56:44 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old' 25474 1182222482 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 06:56:44 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 58 1777 40909 #### #### Checksum: 76 2433 29595 #### --------------010506010500090606010305 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-ip6fw" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-ip6fw" # Patch for misc/113825 for ip6fw # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -c 'sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old' 'sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c' Index: ./sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old Prereq: 1.1.2.2.2.2 *** ./sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old Tue Jun 19 00:59:48 2007 --- ./sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c Tue Jun 19 01:14:33 2007 *************** *** 1112,1118 **** if (!ac) show_usage("missing argument" " for ``icmptypes''"); ! fill_icmptypes(rule.fw_icmp6types, av, &rule.fw_flg); av++; ac--; continue; } --- 1112,1118 ---- if (!ac) show_usage("missing argument" " for ``icmptypes''"); ! fill_icmptypes((u_long *)rule.fw_icmp6types, av, &rule.fw_flg); av++; ac--; continue; } #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 06:57:45 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old' 35300 1182230073 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 06:57:45 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 56 1919 49188 #### #### Checksum: 74 2574 37750 #### --------------010506010500090606010305 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-rpc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-rpc" # Second patch for misc/113825 for rpc (getpublickey.c) # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -c 'lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old' 'lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c' Index: ./lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old Prereq: 1.10 *** ./lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old Mon Jun 18 18:25:14 2007 --- ./lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c Mon Jun 18 18:31:07 2007 *************** *** 65,71 **** */ int __getpublickey_real(netname, publickey) ! char *netname; char *publickey; { char lookup[3 * HEXKEYBYTES]; --- 65,71 ---- */ int __getpublickey_real(netname, publickey) ! const char *netname; char *publickey; { char lookup[3 * HEXKEYBYTES]; *************** *** 92,98 **** int getpublicandprivatekey(key, ret) ! char *key; char *ret; { char buf[1024]; /* big enough */ --- 92,98 ---- int getpublicandprivatekey(key, ret) ! const char *key; char *ret; { char buf[1024]; /* big enough */ #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 06:55:31 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old' 4227 1182205867 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 06:55:31 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 73 2105 1931 #### #### Checksum: 91 2781 57998 #### --------------010506010500090606010305 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-rpc-auth" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-rpc-auth" # First patch for misc/113825 for rpc (auth.h) # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -c 'include/rpc/auth.h.old' 'include/rpc/auth.h' Index: ./include/rpc/auth.h.old Prereq: 1.17 *** ./include/rpc/auth.h.old Mon Jun 18 19:54:59 2007 --- ./include/rpc/auth.h Mon Jun 18 21:07:43 2007 *************** *** 299,305 **** */ __BEGIN_DECLS extern int getpublickey (const char *, char *); ! extern int getpublicandprivatekey (char *, char *); extern int getsecretkey (char *, char *, char *); __END_DECLS --- 299,305 ---- */ __BEGIN_DECLS extern int getpublickey (const char *, char *); ! extern int getpublicandprivatekey (const char *, char *); extern int getsecretkey (char *, char *, char *); __END_DECLS #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 06:54:14 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'include/rpc/auth.h.old' 10401 1182215263 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 06:54:14 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 56 1912 53784 #### #### Checksum: 74 2580 43450 #### --------------010506010500090606010305-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 12:07:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CE416A46B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: from smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.52.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F65813C469 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john_m_cooper@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 79105 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2007 11:40:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type; b=B1Io/uwfFoqqmS2QFSmdJLm1+NKGRX6RDFoCpOzQuu13EtZmvsjNf9kp6SZ3xl4+JlYkpDM5ooPzrKndycU9Z8jNRDbsDNvYDOfUEYRiF78ixKnbT3APRlSD7LTGXgyQld+ZkiX4L3C8zDEQ/79vxKF+HtGuAb8/6wZ1z3wO0h4= ; Received: from unknown (HELO borgdemon2.hsd1.md.comcast.net) (j.m.cooper@borgsdemons.com@69.251.16.205 with login) by smtp105.biz.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 11:40:45 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: H3wp_t0VM1lfu_hUUSh8B5jsi2.dZLvaXAxP7nj12PInsSa2VIt_k1yk5eFpvFQA8VyNOfJg_jlk085Ov.4FaqFf8GSBkgLzSjsJAL_MvbOdNExDbbXDsAeLYmp_dyFMy7RLuwAOHFZPTKTK0.M3OG1CdQ-- Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by borgdemon2.hsd1.md.comcast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BA85D01 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:40:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4677C0BB.30806@yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 07:40:43 -0400 From: John Merryweather Cooper User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b1pre (X11/20070521) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Stable Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------040409080507080403040202" Subject: WAS: misc/113825: WARN Error in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE (/usr/src/lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:07:28 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040409080507080403040202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Maybe you would like unified diff's better? Sorry . . . jmc --------------040409080507080403040202 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-csup" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-csup" # misc/113825 # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -ruN 'contrib/csup/proto.c.old' 'contrib/csup/proto.c' Index: ./contrib/csup/proto.c.old --- ./contrib/csup/proto.c.old Tue Jun 19 04:29:42 2007 +++ ./contrib/csup/proto.c Tue Jun 19 05:31:31 2007 @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ }; static void killer_start(struct killer *, struct mux *); -static void *killer_run(void *); +static void killer_run(void *); static void killer_stop(struct killer *); static int proto_waitconnect(int); @@ -963,6 +963,8 @@ /* Start the killer thread. It is used to protect against some signals during the multi-threaded run so that we can gracefully fail. */ +typedef void *(*start_routine)(void *); + static void killer_start(struct killer *k, struct mux *m) { @@ -976,13 +978,14 @@ sigaddset(&k->sigset, SIGTERM); sigaddset(&k->sigset, SIGPIPE); pthread_sigmask(SIG_BLOCK, &k->sigset, NULL); - error = pthread_create(&k->thread, NULL, killer_run, k); + error = pthread_create(&k->thread, NULL, (start_routine)killer_run, k); if (error) err(1, "pthread_create"); } /* The main loop of the killer thread. */ -static void * + +static void killer_run(void *arg) { struct killer *k; #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 07:31:02 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'contrib/csup/proto.c.old' 25477 1182245491 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 07:31:02 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 73 2412 32655 #### #### Checksum: 91 3047 19426 #### --------------040409080507080403040202 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-ggated" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-ggated" # misc/113825 # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -ruN 'sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old' 'sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c' Index: ./sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old --- ./sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old Mon Jun 18 23:05:16 2007 +++ ./sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c Mon Jun 18 23:08:02 2007 @@ -756,6 +756,7 @@ error = pthread_mutex_unlock(&outqueue_mtx); assert(error == 0); } + return arg; } static void * @@ -810,6 +811,7 @@ } free(req); } + return arg; } static void #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 07:35:00 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'sbin/ggate/ggated/ggated.c.old' 25474 1182222482 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 07:35:00 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 54 1705 38343 #### #### Checksum: 72 2340 25117 #### --------------040409080507080403040202 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-ip6fw" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-ip6fw" # misc/113825 # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -ruN 'sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old' 'sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c' Index: ./sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old Prereq: 1.1.2.2.2.2 --- ./sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old Tue Jun 19 00:59:48 2007 +++ ./sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c Tue Jun 19 01:14:33 2007 @@ -1112,7 +1112,7 @@ if (!ac) show_usage("missing argument" " for ``icmptypes''"); - fill_icmptypes(rule.fw_icmp6types, + fill_icmptypes((u_long *)rule.fw_icmp6types, av, &rule.fw_flg); av++; ac--; continue; } #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 07:36:03 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'sbin/ip6fw/ip6fw.c.old' 35300 1182230073 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 07:36:03 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 48 1731 38403 #### #### Checksum: 66 2366 25176 #### --------------040409080507080403040202 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-rpc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-rpc" # misc/113825 # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -ruN 'lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old' 'lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c' Index: ./lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old Prereq: 1.10 --- ./lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old Mon Jun 18 18:25:14 2007 +++ ./lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c Mon Jun 18 18:31:07 2007 @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ */ int __getpublickey_real(netname, publickey) - char *netname; + const char *netname; char *publickey; { char lookup[3 * HEXKEYBYTES]; @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int getpublicandprivatekey(key, ret) - char *key; + const char *key; char *ret; { char buf[1024]; /* big enough */ #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 07:34:09 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'lib/libc/rpc/getpublickey.c.old' 4227 1182205867 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 07:34:09 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 57 1826 48921 #### #### Checksum: 75 2461 35705 #### --------------040409080507080403040202 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-rpc-auth" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-rpc-auth" # misc/113825 # # To apply this patch: # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'applypatch' program with this patch file as input. # # If you do not have 'applypatch', it is part of the 'makepatch' package # that you can fetch from the Comprehensive Perl Archive Network: # http://www.perl.com/CPAN/authors/Johan_Vromans/makepatch-x.y.tar.gz # In the above URL, 'x' should be 2 or higher. # # To apply this patch without the use of 'applypatch': # STEP 1: Chdir to the source directory. # STEP 2: Run the 'patch' program with this file as input. # #### End of Preamble #### #### Patch data follows #### diff -ruN 'include/rpc/auth.h.old' 'include/rpc/auth.h' Index: ./include/rpc/auth.h.old Prereq: 1.17 --- ./include/rpc/auth.h.old Mon Jun 18 19:54:59 2007 +++ ./include/rpc/auth.h Mon Jun 18 21:07:43 2007 @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ */ __BEGIN_DECLS extern int getpublickey (const char *, char *); -extern int getpublicandprivatekey (char *, char *); +extern int getpublicandprivatekey (const char *, char *); extern int getsecretkey (char *, char *, char *); __END_DECLS #### End of Patch data #### #### ApplyPatch data follows #### # Data version : 1.0 # Date generated : Tue Jun 19 07:33:09 2007 # Generated by : makepatch 2.03 # Recurse directories : Yes # Excluded files : (\A|/).*\~\Z # (\A|/).*\.a\Z # (\A|/).*\.bak\Z # (\A|/).*\.BAK\Z # (\A|/).*\.elc\Z # (\A|/).*\.exe\Z # (\A|/).*\.gz\Z # (\A|/).*\.ln\Z # (\A|/).*\.o\Z # (\A|/).*\.obj\Z # (\A|/).*\.olb\Z # (\A|/).*\.old\Z # (\A|/).*\.orig\Z # (\A|/).*\.rej\Z # (\A|/).*\.so\Z # (\A|/).*\.Z\Z # (\A|/)\.del\-.*\Z # (\A|/)\.make\.state\Z # (\A|/)\.nse_depinfo\Z # (\A|/)core\Z # (\A|/)tags\Z # (\A|/)TAGS\Z # p 'include/rpc/auth.h.old' 10401 1182215263 0100644 #### End of ApplyPatch data #### #### End of Patch kit [created: Tue Jun 19 07:33:09 2007] #### #### Patch checksum: 48 1735 41901 #### #### Checksum: 66 2370 28675 #### --------------040409080507080403040202-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 13:04:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915C516A400 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from mail2.secureworks.net (mail2.secureworks.net [65.114.32.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5FE13C4C3 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:04:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.secureworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7068E17405; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secureworks.net Received: from mail2.secureworks.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.secureworks.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxXiv0yqeZ9A; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from descartes.internal.secureworks.net (mole1.secureworks.net [63.239.86.3]) by mail2.secureworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F81E17425; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4677D455.9020401@jellydonut.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:04:21 -0400 From: Michael Proto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070615 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rong-en Fan References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:04:24 -0000 Rong-en Fan wrote: > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > Is this still the case? I've been using a r/w nullfs for the last several months with no issues. Granted, I don't do a heavy amount of writing to the mount point but I haven't seen any issues with it whatsoever. -Proto From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 13:40:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0646916A469 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD4E13C48A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 29540 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2007 08:40:47 -0500 Received: from 210-84-48-213.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.48.213) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 08:40:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:40:43 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "eculp@argosteve.com" Message-ID: <20070619234043.48169311@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20070614092909.553h1gdf2g4gg4ks@correo.argosteve.com> References: <20070614092909.553h1gdf2g4gg4ks@correo.argosteve.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange problem with skype on RELENG_6 KERNEL since the end of may. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:40:48 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500 "eculp@argosteve.com" wrote: > A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer > kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show > nothing. I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80 > answers with what would seem to be binary chars. I close skype and > all is back to normal. I had originally thought that it had to do > with the new xorg installation but it seems to be something in the > kernel. The configurations were the same, basically GENERIC with all > the pf stuff. Hi, Skype has an option to listen on tcp/80 and tcp/443 for incoming connections, because it assumes somehow that firewalls will be configured to allow that traffic in (some Windowze world assumption, i guess). In the tools menu, go to Options, Advanced, untick the option that reads "Use port (sic) 80 and 443 as alternatives for incoming connections". Apply, exit skype, restart it. confirm with sockstat -4 | grep skype | grep \*:80 that skype is NOT listening on port 80 (you shouldn't see any output back from that cmd) ( similar for 443) _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome RTFM and STFW before anything bad happens. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 15:27:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F4816A400 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from wmail.teledomenet.gr (wmail.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78CC13C457 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by wmail.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753161C951C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:27:26 +0300 (EEST) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:27:24 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <003801c7b05c$cac2c3b0$0c00a8c0@Artem> In-Reply-To: <003801c7b05c$cac2c3b0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706191827.25457.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 15:27:29 -0000 On Sunday 17 June 2007 00:24, Artem Kuchin wrote: > Maybe someone can englighten me when > inode change time changes? What must be done > with file to change it (except writing to it)? stat(2) would be very enlightening in this context. > I tried chmoding - it does not affect inode time. chmod works for me: nik:1:~$ stat -f "%c" /tmp/test 1182266005 nik:1:~$ chmod -rw /tmp/test nik:1:~$ stat -f "%c" /tmp/test 1182266014 How do check the timestamps? Do you use stat(1) or something else? Nikos From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 16:27:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44BC16A46C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD9913C44B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tevans.uk@googlemail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so1639656wxd for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=qVgYHxiYWMjjqhqECCbgTzfbx0X9/s2vseOIFpDF/akGyzwOVYqx1krJ1o9x2VAua711EviC6lZREuskjj+ITAAsdA1B3Knx+FOUsQUse5CRdH/N8QJznLA6VH9RfCmv73VmeiVvw8J4uvwXwQtqC4wrwXSnxQrJ6tylYb4F3pw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; b=U1eHZH/IRTINi/Fqttz61QGgYdfTqg1ptY2Dw4kciBAnK+f+iT2QCYvCDQM9XeT2qrjdxIcrUTSOeUG6kXFXNe3N99p7F2LzuEiz8pTpWuvHWQvbt9RN42W9IVUSRCwCF0KuQCy2dJrNgAuARpmmwxRyR+p4z8O5FYJGLe4r6fc= Received: by 10.90.119.15 with SMTP id r15mr5107455agc.1182270422588; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1? ( [217.206.187.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i7sm5330583nfh.2007.06.19.09.27.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Evans To: Norberto Meijome In-Reply-To: <20070619234043.48169311@localhost> References: <20070614092909.553h1gdf2g4gg4ks@correo.argosteve.com> <20070619234043.48169311@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UdoSzRkn2ZK7xVxw+7ho" Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:26:59 +0100 Message-Id: <1182270419.1253.19.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: "eculp@argosteve.com" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange problem with skype on RELENG_6 KERNEL since the end of may. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:27:03 -0000 --=-UdoSzRkn2ZK7xVxw+7ho Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500 > "eculp@argosteve.com" wrote: >=20 > > A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer =20 > > kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show =20 > > nothing. I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80 =20 > > answers with what would seem to be binary chars. I close skype and =20 > > all is back to normal. I had originally thought that it had to do =20 > > with the new xorg installation but it seems to be something in the =20 > > kernel. The configurations were the same, basically GENERIC with all =20 > > the pf stuff. >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Skype has an option to listen on tcp/80 and tcp/443 for incoming connecti= ons, > because it assumes somehow that firewalls will be configured to allow tha= t > traffic in (some Windowze world assumption, i guess). >=20 > In the tools menu, go to Options, Advanced, untick the option that reads= "Use > port (sic) 80 and 443 as alternatives for incoming connections". >=20 > Apply, exit skype, restart it. >=20 > confirm with=20 >=20 > sockstat -4 | grep skype | grep \*:80 >=20 > that skype is NOT listening on port 80 (you shouldn't see any output back= from > that cmd) ( similar for 443) >=20 Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root? --=-UdoSzRkn2ZK7xVxw+7ho Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGeAPTlcRvFfyds/cRAiewAJ4lvDmjMkO8rSlMlC9iNB4Zh0rUHACeL9Ng 34VD9+ogBEcDoK6n945Hjbg= =GVFa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UdoSzRkn2ZK7xVxw+7ho-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 17:41:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCB316A468 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: from smtp811.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp811.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A5A613C45A for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@tomjudge.com) Received: (qmail 87592 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2007 17:41:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (thomasjudge@btinternet.com@217.44.143.76 with plain) by smtp811.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 17:41:06 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: Qv6GMgAVM1knRBgfUuseVXA08hZE.E7Fp9ua9u_6HrFg3yxD Message-ID: <4678154A.5080005@tomjudge.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:41:30 +0100 From: Tom Judge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Evans References: <20070614092909.553h1gdf2g4gg4ks@correo.argosteve.com> <20070619234043.48169311@localhost> <1182270419.1253.19.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1182270419.1253.19.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "eculp@argosteve.com" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Norberto Meijome , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange problem with skype on RELENG_6 KERNEL since the end of may. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:41:08 -0000 Tom Evans wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 23:40 +1000, Norberto Meijome wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:29:09 -0500 >> "eculp@argosteve.com" wrote: >> >>> A RELENG_6 kernel from May 21 works fine with skype but boot a newer >>> kernel and skype seems to be blocking port 80. Apache logs show >>> nothing. I can find no logs errors anywhere but a telnet to port 80 >>> answers with what would seem to be binary chars. I close skype and >>> all is back to normal. I had originally thought that it had to do >>> with the new xorg installation but it seems to be something in the >>> kernel. The configurations were the same, basically GENERIC with all >>> the pf stuff. >> Hi, >> >> Skype has an option to listen on tcp/80 and tcp/443 for incoming connections, >> because it assumes somehow that firewalls will be configured to allow that >> traffic in (some Windowze world assumption, i guess). >> >> In the tools menu, go to Options, Advanced, untick the option that reads "Use >> port (sic) 80 and 443 as alternatives for incoming connections". >> >> Apply, exit skype, restart it. >> >> confirm with >> >> sockstat -4 | grep skype | grep \*:80 >> >> that skype is NOT listening on port 80 (you shouldn't see any output back from >> that cmd) ( similar for 443) >> > > Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root? Yes if the sysctl's below net.inet.ip.portrange all have there default values. Tom From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 18:34:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B058916A46B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlove@pixelfish.com) Received: from mail01.vmatrixmail.com (mail01.vmatrixmail.com [216.219.244.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59C813C4B7 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlove@pixelfish.com) Received: (root@mail01.vmatrixmail.com) by vmatrixmail.com id S6134479AbXFSS2E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:28:04 -0700 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Rich Media Mail V4. Vmatrix, (C) 2003 From: "Justin Love" Sender: "Justin Love" Message-Id: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:28:04 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Video Turns Software Leads Into Buyers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jlove@pixelfish.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:11 -0000 Greetings!

You have a state-of-the-art software application, but do your customers know it?

Bridge the gap between your latest software solutions and the end user with video.

PixelFish is a video production company that excels at producing high-quality videos that sell. Our talented and accomplished crew starts with a focused and innovative script to match your messaging needs. We then hand off the approved script to our team of videographers who coordinate each and every detail to get the best footage. Experienced and savvy editors complete the final stages to produce the marketing or educational video that keeps you at the cutting edge of software development.

I have embedded a few samples of our work to the right. Click on the videos to see what we can do. We digitize our videos for optimal distribution over the web, via e-mail, CD-ROM and other popular media platforms. We also provide the right tools for measuring the positive impact of each video investment instantly and around the clock.

Whether you are looking to train your customers on your latest application, promote your software, or simply create a software demonstration guide, PixelFish is your one-stop-shop for affordable video solutions for all types of purposes. Call us today to begin the planning process of your video or to gather more information. You can reach us at 800.503.3020 or on our website at www.pixelfish.com.

We’d love to work with you to help turn your software leads into sales.

Sincerely,

Justin Love
PixelFish, Inc.
800.503.3020 x7109
jlove@pixelfish.com
http://www.pixelfish.com
Certiport
Quadrant
InvesTools
------------------------------------------------ Unsubscribe to safely remove yourself from this email list, please send email to info@pixelfish.com. Powered by Pixelfish http://www.pixelfish.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 18:34:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53616A46F for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlove@pixelfish.com) Received: from mail01.vmatrixmail.com (mail01.vmatrixmail.com [216.219.244.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F0913C484 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlove@pixelfish.com) Received: (root@mail01.vmatrixmail.com) by vmatrixmail.com id S6135109AbXFSS3Q for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:29:16 -0700 To: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Rich Media Mail V4. Vmatrix, (C) 2003 From: "Justin Love" Sender: "Justin Love" Message-Id: Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:29:16 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Video Turns Software Leads Into Buyers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jlove@pixelfish.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:34:49 -0000 Greetings!

You have a state-of-the-art software application, but do your customers know it?

Bridge the gap between your latest software solutions and the end user with video.

PixelFish is a video production company that excels at producing high-quality videos that sell. Our talented and accomplished crew starts with a focused and innovative script to match your messaging needs. We then hand off the approved script to our team of videographers who coordinate each and every detail to get the best footage. Experienced and savvy editors complete the final stages to produce the marketing or educational video that keeps you at the cutting edge of software development.

I have embedded a few samples of our work to the right. Click on the videos to see what we can do. We digitize our videos for optimal distribution over the web, via e-mail, CD-ROM and other popular media platforms. We also provide the right tools for measuring the positive impact of each video investment instantly and around the clock.

Whether you are looking to train your customers on your latest application, promote your software, or simply create a software demonstration guide, PixelFish is your one-stop-shop for affordable video solutions for all types of purposes. Call us today to begin the planning process of your video or to gather more information. You can reach us at 800.503.3020 or on our website at www.pixelfish.com.

We’d love to work with you to help turn your software leads into sales.

Sincerely,

Justin Love
PixelFish, Inc.
800.503.3020 x7109
jlove@pixelfish.com
http://www.pixelfish.com
Certiport
Quadrant
InvesTools
------------------------------------------------ Unsubscribe to safely remove yourself from this email list, please send email to info@pixelfish.com. Powered by Pixelfish http://www.pixelfish.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 19:37:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCADE16A400 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.c0mplx.org (home.c0mplx.org [213.178.180.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235D13C448 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from pi by home.c0mplx.org with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I0jVs-0000hZ-Hu; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:37:16 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:37:16 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: daichi@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070619193716.GA2628@home.c0mplx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: unionfs6-p19-20070504 and devfs on a very recent 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:37:17 -0000 Hello, I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed 6.2-STABLE with the http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs. I made a testsetup in March where I used a 6.2-STABLE at that time without additional patches. On the testsystem it works fine. On the new system, devfs does not work, a devfs mounted below some unionfs mount point can be seen in df and mount, but no device nodes appear in ..../dev/. Let me explain in more detail: I mount a template of a jail using unionfs: /sbin/mount -t unionfs -o noatime,below /vserv/template/stage2 /vserv/somehost Then I mount the necessary devfs: mount_devfs devfs /vserv/somehost/dev In parallel, I mount a devfs somewhere else: mount_devfs devfs /mnt Both mounts show up: # mount /dev/ad4s1a on / (ufs, local) devfs on /dev (devfs, local) /dev/ad4s1f on /vserv (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad4s1d on /usr (ufs, local, soft-updates) /dev/ad4s1e on /var (ufs, local, soft-updates) procfs on /proc (procfs, local) linprocfs on /usr/compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) :/vserv/template/stage2 on /vserv/somehost (unionfs, local, noatime) devfs on /vserv/ns2.vistec.net/dev (devfs, local) devfs on /mnt (devfs, local) But: no files in the devfs below the unionfs mount point, while on the other point, plenty of files appear: # ls -la /vserv/ns2.vistec.net/dev/ | wc -l 3 # ls -la /mnt/ | wc -l 100 Is this some bug with devfs and the recent unionfs patch ? -- pi@c0mplx.org +49 171 3101372 13 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 21:17:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C19C16A41F for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.c0mplx.org (home.c0mplx.org [213.178.180.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0840213C457 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from pi by home.c0mplx.org with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I0l4j-0000tE-Sa for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:17:21 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:17:21 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070619211721.GG13981@home.c0mplx.org> References: <20070619193716.GA2628@home.c0mplx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070619193716.GA2628@home.c0mplx.org> Cc: Subject: Re: unionfs6-p19-20070504 and devfs on a very recent 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:17:22 -0000 Hi! > I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed > 6.2-STABLE with the > > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff > > patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs. Going back to the most recent stable without unionfs6-p19-20070504 works. -- pi@c0mplx.org +49 171 3101372 13 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 00:31:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CCA16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF20F13C458 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from localhost (tarsier.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C43BEB1B42; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:31:49 +0800 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at geekcn.org Received: from tarsier.geekcn.org ([210.51.165.229]) by localhost (mail.geekcn.org [210.51.165.229]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 433GVF5kioS3; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:31:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from charlie.delphij.net (unknown [221.221.171.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tarsier.geekcn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1E4EB1977; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:31:47 +0800 (CST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=default; d=delphij.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ubocXBpkJr5jIGDB3gzwysiBe9nSfMTzh3V1pm08MwbG84mrn4kKLxTUDOsLoleWg Y7DmPqH06SGvzEzpX4rqQ== Message-ID: <46787572.1090800@delphij.net> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:31:46 +0800 From: Xin LI User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rong-en Fan References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 OpenPGP: url=http://www.delphij.net/delphij.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:31:50 -0000 Rong-en Fan wrote: > I'm running 6.2-RELEASE, and I am wondering > if using nullfs w/ rw is safe in a production environment? > My impression is that ro nullfs is ok, but not rw. > Is this still the case? nullfs is quite stable from my impression at least for my workload. We use it for some heavily loaded package building environment. The old unionfs implementation may have some problems. Cheers, From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 01:58:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4C116A468 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D82613C483 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 10800 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2007 20:58:23 -0500 Received: from 210-84-48-213.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (210.84.48.213) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 19 Jun 2007 20:58:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:58:16 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: Tom Evans Message-ID: <20070620115816.2f404cd6@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1182270419.1253.19.camel@localhost> References: <20070614092909.553h1gdf2g4gg4ks@correo.argosteve.com> <20070619234043.48169311@localhost> <1182270419.1253.19.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "eculp@argosteve.com" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange problem with skype on RELENG_6 KERNEL since the end of may. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:58:23 -0000 On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:26:59 +0100 Tom Evans wrote: > Doesn't this imply that the OP was running Skype as root? touche. but from what OP described, that's what was happening... :D ouch :D _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both." Benjamin Franklin I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 04:26:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A1E16A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F091413C45A for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:26:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.66.240.106] (public-wireless.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5K3t1DP025213 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:55:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Jo Rhett Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:47:48 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - SENDER Whitelisted (jrhett@svcolo.com: Mail from user authenticated via SMTP AUTH allowed always) X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 114196 - 57288358e980 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Subject: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 04:26:47 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems to not get useless e-mail. It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 07:49:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3270816A421 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florian.heigl@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E868413C44C for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florian.heigl@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so209196pyi for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:49:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BK1Stc2laDqNCilKifHmqa3HhprmJX0b+BRbvtN/rl1qoi7XR+7/86QS16F29gY9umNhawAQ1sCG27XCv1Fp1sncgo3LWUtBRXiXURTprTSZ9Ev3sLdjNrI4yhAkpGKS9bJehpKoWkMgitaFRQ92ezrgDGaaFry0akTaCJH7gSk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GCAgIKSyNiXFC8e1D2EeAvM1gttViCgyTMjBhH0Uar63uBKO3k00aPemCsYsqhoLLU7aWVvT50KIwJne3eNIS8CUoY8ceRVwbczI08FVSY+m9QMGsHNgtpH0GDepqDPAI5QC/FXBTqQ9plNRHWVM6mg1PrgG4T37kKw/FH6hmtw= Received: by 10.64.149.15 with SMTP id w15mr906433qbd.1182324351536; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.182.4 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <77abe410706200025l25b478ceua652fed8e4f3cdaa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:25:51 +0200 From: "Florian Heigl" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070620071532.EDD7713C45E@mx1.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070620071532.EDD7713C45E@mx1.freebsd.org> Subject: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 07:49:54 -0000 Hi list, i've made the following changes to my /etc/rc.conf for a small appliance system. fsck_y_enable="YES" root_rw_mount="NO" squid_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_pidfile="/var/run/sendmail.pid" sendmail_procname="/usr/sbin/sendmail" sendmail_flags="-L sm-mta -bd -q30m" sendmail_submit_enable="YES" tmpmfs="YES" tmpsize="4m" tmpmfs_flags="-S -M" varmfs="YES" varsize="16m" varmfs_flags="-S -M" populate_var="YES" i was under the assumption that populate_var would carry over vital data from the on-disk /var, but there seem to be a few exceptions. s100-mum# pkg_info pkg_info: no packages installed i assume i will just hack the corresponding script to copy over a bit of data, but maybe someone has better advice than that. of course i need to go back to full r/w mode to add packages but a false result from pkg_info is not too great. any tipps / experiences are highly welcome :) -- 'Sie brauchen sich um Ihre Zukunft keine Gedanken zu machen' From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 09:42:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B0D16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel-dvorak@atlas.cz) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz (pipa.vshosting.cz [81.0.201.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5919D13C46A for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:42:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel-dvorak@atlas.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C5E1C97F7; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:24:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pipa.vshosting.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pipa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23344-03; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:24:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.40.8.101] (rikgw.hellteam.net [82.208.56.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pipa.vshosting.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58B01C97F2; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:24:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4678F262.4010701@atlas.cz> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:24:50 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Daniel_Dvo=F8=E1k?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger References: <20070619193716.GA2628@home.c0mplx.org> <20070619211721.GG13981@home.c0mplx.org> In-Reply-To: <20070619211721.GG13981@home.c0mplx.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pipa.vshosting.cz Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unionfs6-p19-20070504 and devfs on a very recent 6.2-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: daniel-dvorak@atlas.cz List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:42:10 -0000 So at the end, maybe we are two how couldn´t use p19 diff right. My recent post about this patch and its no working state at th 8th of June in this mailling list. Dan Kurt Jaeger napsal(a): > Hi! > > >> I'm using unionfs on a recently (approx. 5 days ago) cvsup'ed >> 6.2-STABLE with the >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p19-20070504.diff >> >> patch and have a problem with devfs mounted over unionfs. >> > > Going back to the most recent stable without unionfs6-p19-20070504 > works. > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 13:54:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9F416A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D9413C43E for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:54:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (czgzuv@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5KDsQKr022665; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:54:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l5KDsPtl022664; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:54:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200706201354.l5KDsPtl022664@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, matrix@itlegion.ru In-Reply-To: <003801c7b05c$cac2c3b0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:54:31 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, matrix@itlegion.ru List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:54:33 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: > I use gtar (gtar because it has incremental > backups, and tar does not) You _can_ use BSD tar for incremental backups. I do that every day. When you do a level-0 backup, simply "touch" a flag file somewhere. Then when you do the level-1 backup, use the --newer-than option with that flag file, so only files that were modified after the level-0 backup get archived. The --newer-than option checks the ctime. If you want to look at the mtime only (i.e. ignoring renames, chmod, chown etc.), use --newer-mtime-than instead. Please refer to the tar(1) manpage for details. > I use inode change time in order to backup > all changed files. I have notices that some > files are always backed up even if they did not > change. For example all mysql database. > I checked their file change time and it is not > changed, howeever, inode change time changes > on every mysql restart. > > Maybe someone can englighten me when > inode change time changes? What must be done > with file to change it (except writing to it)? > I tried chmoding - it does not affect inode time. The mtime changes upon every data write to the file, the ctime additionally changes upon every change of the inode data (i.e. file meta data). This is documented in the stat(2) manpage: st_ctime Time when file status was last changed (inode data modification). Changed by the chmod(2), chown(2), link(2), mknod(2), rename(2), unlink(2), utimes(2) and write(2) system calls. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 15:28:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78AF16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from nest.therub.org (mn-69-68-192-216.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.68.192.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A2413C45A for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: by nest.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 58D5873053; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500 From: Dan Rue To: Jo Rhett Message-ID: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:28:58 -0000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 > > This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/ > expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems > to not get useless e-mail. > > It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when everything is OK? Dan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 16:09:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878BC16A46B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from skywagon.kjsl.com (skywagon.kjsl.com [69.36.240.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713EC13C465 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from dhcp-64-102-51-214.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-51-214.cisco.com [64.102.51.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by skywagon.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B342A68EC; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:50:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:50:23 -0400 From: Javier Henderson To: Dan Rue Message-ID: <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:09:48 -0000 On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 >> >> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/ >> expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems >> to not get useless e-mail. >> >> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... > > I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when everything > is OK? So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to complain? -jav From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 16:19:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6EB16A421 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 269BF13C4C7 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 10328 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2007 20:18:58 +0400 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 20 Jun 2007 20:18:58 +0400 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.33, engine: 4.33.5.10110, virus records: 213321, updated: 20.06.2007] Message-ID: <04e601c7b356$b47cddf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: References: <200706201354.l5KDsPtl022664@lurza.secnetix.de> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:18:55 +0400 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 Cc: Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:19:03 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > Artem Kuchin wrote: >> I use gtar (gtar because it has incremental >> backups, and tar does not) > > You _can_ use BSD tar for incremental backups. I do that > every day. Yes, but that's not real incremental backup because if you restore data you'll get a bunch of files that were deleted along the way. gtar stores full file list and actually deleted the deleted files when restoring. And i have excessively many of such created and deleted files and i need only current ones. So tar is of no use for me. Also, i use inode time because i only need files which really have been changed. For example, i you restore a file from a month ago it will have a date which is a month ago. Then that backup is destroyed but this file would not be backed up because the date is too much in the past. So, we loose the file. If i used inode change time the file will be backup in any case. However, some "stupid" programs like mysql or qmail seem to touch files so, for example, all mail message and databases are backed up every time. And this sucks. So, when backing up these files i need to use file modification time and it is suitable here, since these file are never managed by human, only by daemon and old file eather go away (like in email) or change its mod time (like in mysql). What is still do not understand is what time gtar uses for --newer option. Man page says: --newer date Only store files with creation time newer than date. This is simply not true. NOT creation time defenetly. It is either modification time or inode change time. Which one? -- Regards, Artem From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 16:47:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1670816A421 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from nest.therub.org (mn-69-68-192-216.sta.embarqhsd.net [69.68.192.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FAB13C487 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: by nest.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6627073053; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500 From: Dan Rue To: Javier Henderson Message-ID: <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:47:50 -0000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 > >> > >> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change > >> current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, > >> many systems to not get useless e-mail. > >> > >> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... > > > > I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when > > everything is OK? > > So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to > complain? If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or without this patch. Dan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 17:21:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4005F16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from skywagon.kjsl.com (skywagon.kjsl.com [69.36.240.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C67913C484 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier@kjsl.com) Received: from dhcp-64-102-51-214.cisco.com (dhcp-64-102-51-214.cisco.com [64.102.51.214]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: javier) by skywagon.kjsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2EC2A6928; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:21:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:21:08 -0400 From: Javier Henderson To: Dan Rue Message-ID: <20070620132108447264.6b8a3cd5@kjsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:21:13 -0000 On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 >>>> >>>> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change >>>> current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, >>>> many systems to not get useless e-mail. >>>> >>>> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... >>> >>> I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when >>> everything is OK? >> >> So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to >> complain? > > If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or > without this patch. I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be quiet when everything is OK. Maybe it's a personal preference, I guess. -jav From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 18:08:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADAF16A469 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C5313C457 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so225085waf for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:08:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BrlCrzEG7ny5feuC3+emi8Lboo6qooCdUsZDKZDj9+5MKKMQ6FGwghKKmI/bmXKHHNtU9dzHT1WIc53ADTnk3naOuOuIe8W+OjtAR5q9TeqwhX6S21QpVztKsrTqG6XppAmq9XnPU24gwlkVGw2HKMNKmleqVfzW4ZUEbRynz9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CjNzf/UF04eAmmyul6wCVf4qiRUQHzJsy630tgE5zptMXi0C3y1dWliEnznTxIoC8KhklUPYPVtQI8n0BvqsaWh4iRc6ZX51BIPT0mwgquwN740kZzCw/CsyUfPdmyQW9O2jPa488QTrL8epH+M+Ri+cVdGA4WbUAwtaPtf7OJ8= Received: by 10.115.17.1 with SMTP id u1mr551873wai.1182361228172; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.11 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:40:28 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:08:41 -0000 On 6/20/07, Dan Rue wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 > > >> > > >> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change > > >> current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, > > >> many systems to not get useless e-mail. > > >> > > >> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... > > > > > > I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when > > > everything is OK? > > > > So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to > > complain? > > If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or > without this patch. Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea. In this case, absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence, which is contrary to the general case. Perhaps the OP needs a better way of dealing with the notifications than simply turning them off. My $US0.02 Kurt From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 19:36:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DD416A468 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE67213C44B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.67.240.119] (public-wireless.sc.svcolo.com [64.13.143.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5KJamId020364; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:36:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: <20070620132108447264.6b8a3cd5@kjsl.com> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <20070620132108447264.6b8a3cd5@kjsl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:36:42 -0700 To: Javier Henderson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - jrhett@svcolo.com is whitelisted. X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 114485 - 70754243ba16 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Dan Rue Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:36:49 -0000 On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Javier Henderson wrote: >>> So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too >>> broken to >>> complain? >> >> If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or >> without this patch. > > I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be > quiet when everything is OK. Maybe it's a personal preference, I > guess. No difference. If every day you get dozens of messages saying "No output from 5 commands" then you'll never know that a problem occurred because the message is the same. And more than likely, you just delete the messages every morning without reading them anyway -- which is worse. So the net effect of this change is zero, except that you can disable getting useless messages and thus if you do get e-mail you know that a problem has been happened and you won't ignore it. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 19:43:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CD716A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5AD13C4AE for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.67.240.119] (public-wireless.sc.svcolo.com [64.13.143.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5KJhgin020423; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:43:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:43:36 -0700 To: Kurt Buff X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - jrhett@svcolo.com is whitelisted. X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 114488 - 4f4a1afdd063 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:43:43 -0000 On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > On 6/20/07, Dan Rue wrote: >> If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or >> without this patch. > > Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea. In this > case, absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence, which is > contrary to the general case. You appear to be completely confused about what this change does. All it does is TO ALLOW (not require) the OP to disable the spurious and empty output from successful cron jobs. If I get a message every day saying "No output", how do I know when a failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that behavior. Getting no message is equally useless in the situation where no output was generated *AND* the result code is positive. The more likely is that the OP starts deleting the messages unread each day and thus never sees an actual failure report. > Perhaps the OP needs a better way of dealing with the notifications > than simply turning them off. How do you suggest dealing with 1200-1800 messages which simply say "no output" each day? The commands were successful, and the processes had no output. 1. In that load level I won't notice one missing, so absence of the e- mail is not useful. 2. In that load level I can't possibly read them all. So actual reports of failure will be overlooked. 3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't have to delete thousands of non-errors. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 19:56:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C11016A421 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4314513C489 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so37934waf for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:56:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=be4Q6oeIaHL/tgxxuziwMCNC5nvDLuCtm1caZAiYtNv9Nzh2Xs51PjC3kuoGReejwPOBjNVDpHE9mFewstk1d7CdGa2bR9JEBbNoOVeYz4UzN0OHdINWwKbadz9ghTaxFBzoPmHlJ6QytpXHsD0oGV7DAa6h7Bhn1/OSlE6NvC8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Oatt1FvXIuJuIqqW3ReqtjIChGXZd4l2hT+WJLsX/Q1bpjsxFhVlm9ouXuYeOdHmz4hZ3RJHUK/zAy5+f8rIqnt/0U5JfWa7mHbXLixh6KX8R+90c9a+EBvVovzOfUf+VfnbtJ8s8KgWUV0iXxcAJwJSifAT605G+/hZ6Ym5vYw= Received: by 10.115.94.1 with SMTP id w1mr678452wal.1182369406785; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.173.11 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:56:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:56:46 -0700 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Jo Rhett" In-Reply-To: <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 19:56:47 -0000 On 6/20/07, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: > > > On 6/20/07, Dan Rue wrote: > >> If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or > >> without this patch. > > > > Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea. In this > > case, absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence, which is > > contrary to the general case. > > You appear to be completely confused about what this change does. > All it does is TO ALLOW (not require) the OP to disable the spurious > and empty output from successful cron jobs. > > If I get a message every day saying "No output", how do I know when a > failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that > behavior. Getting no message is equally useless in the situation > where no output was generated *AND* the result code is positive. Currently, if you get no message from that box, *something* is broken. > The more likely is that the OP starts deleting the messages unread > each day and thus never sees an actual failure report. Failure of imagination. > > Perhaps the OP needs a better way of dealing with the notifications > > than simply turning them off. > > How do you suggest dealing with 1200-1800 messages which simply say > "no output" each day? The commands were successful, and the > processes had no output. > > 1. In that load level I won't notice one missing, so absence of the e- > mail is not useful. > > 2. In that load level I can't possibly read them all. So actual > reports of failure will be overlooked. > > 3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't > have to delete thousands of non-errors. Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as well? Kurt From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 20:05:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C8316A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C78413C447 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.67.240.119] (public-wireless.sc.svcolo.com [64.13.143.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5KK5Q2n020729; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:05:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:05:20 -0700 To: "Kurt Buff" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - jrhett@svcolo.com is whitelisted. X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 114502 - b1d7de07baf2 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:05:27 -0000 On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > Currently, if you get no message from that box, *something* is broken. I am not capable as a human being of noticing the lack of one message, when without this patch I would get more than 2,000 each day. >> The more likely is that the OP starts deleting the messages unread >> each day and thus never sees an actual failure report. > > Failure of imagination. No. Having done the work to verify that failures will be reported, I configure the mail system to only send me mail on errors. Better design. > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages > noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as > well? This doesn't solve the "lack of a message" problem you mentioned above. It also requires a new system to be designed and configured, which could have failures of its own. This is more abstraction and zero gain for our environment. Any error should be read in our situation. A non-error does not need to be read. In any case, the primary consideration with this patch is that it allows either model to work. You can do it your way, and we can do it our way. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 20:32:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A385616A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@parodius.com) Received: from mx01.sc1.parodius.com (mx01.sc1.parodius.com [72.20.106.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAA313C44B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@parodius.com) Received: by mx01.sc1.parodius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72BBA1CC044; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:32:15 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Kurt Buff Message-ID: <20070620203215.GA73521@eos.sc1.parodius.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kurt Buff , Jo Rhett , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: Jo Rhett , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:32:15 -0000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:56:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > On 6/20/07, Jo Rhett wrote: > > If I get a message every day saying "No output", how do I know when a > > failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that > > behavior. Getting no message is equally useless in the situation > > where no output was generated *AND* the result code is positive. > > Currently, if you get no message from that box, *something* is broken. Daily Emails with no useful information in them will, by default, get ignored by most SAs. I happen to be one of those SAs, and this is how I have operated for 15+ years. Every SA co-worker I've had has run off the same mentality: "make noise if there's a problem. Silence means things are good." I think this is generally how UNIX operates as well; it gets messy when programmers don't do things like handle error conditions properly (fopen() failed? exit(0) and say nothing!), but programs like that are usually sniffed out and the programmer shunned. If that's not enough for you, let's use cronjobs as an example (and probably the best example). cron by default ONLY MAILS YOU when there's output on stdout/stderr. There's a reason you find 2>&1 >/dev/null in lots of cronjob entries: because people want silence if they don't care things might break. The inverse of that is when things get noisy, things are broken. cron *does not* mail you daily saying "Hey man, things are OK!" > > 3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't > > have to delete thousands of non-errors. > > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages > noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as > well? I think by "unsent" you mean "remaining" (that is, messages not deleted are obvious signs of a problem, thus spawning an Email saying "hey there's messages in this queue still, check it out"). I understand your POV, but I disagree with it. Maybe I'm biased because I work in a NOC, where if we received empty Emails that said nothing other than "No output", after 24 hours we'd be hunting down the responsible owner of the cronjob/script to strangle them. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 20:39:50 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD06616A46B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: from pickle.queue.to (pickle.queue.to [71.180.69.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3739713C45A for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:39:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hg@queue.to) Received: (qmail 83865 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2007 16:13:08 -0400 Received: from cally.queue.to (172.16.0.6) by pickle.queue.to with ESMTP; 20 Jun 2007 16:13:08 -0400 Message-ID: <46798A54.20801@queue.to> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:13:08 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:39:50 -0000 This is a no brainer. The patch seems to retain the current behavior. The desired behavior is on a knob. It doesn't run enough to worry about the extra cycles to run the conditional. A superficial googling will show that emitting messages when there's no exception is a human factors boo-boo, therefore this is a bug fix or at least not a request for spurious feature. Even though the present incarnation appears to be (IMO) borked, least surprise doctrine and inertia suggests committing the patch and moving on. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 20:49:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E1A16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@danielbond.org) Received: from mail.nsn.no (mailone.nsn.no [62.89.38.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 688E113C45D for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@danielbond.org) Received: (qmail 87547 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jun 2007 20:22:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.3.90?) (85.95.44.187) by mail.nsn.no with SMTP; 20 Jun 2007 20:22:24 -0000 Message-ID: <46798C80.6020108@danielbond.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:22:24 +0200 From: Daniel Bond User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jo Rhett References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:49:08 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I like Kurt's approach, having a mailfilter/script-pipe which could remove dynamic variables like timestamps etc, and checksum it against against a "empty" template to see if its deletable. This also verifies that mail-delivery is working, and machine is not dead. What also could be done is feed this information into a database, and show more information, ie: group portaudits on host like: www/apache2: (apache-2.0.55_3,apache-2.0.58) host1,host2,host3,host4,....,[see all] For portaudit I use a small ruby-program w/Net::SSH which runs portaudit-threads on machines, and groups it like somewhat like above on a web-interface. I intend to publish this when it's more "production ready", and not so specific for my use. Sorry for going off-topic. - -DB. Jo Rhett wrote: > On Jun 20, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Currently, if you get no message from that box, *something* is broken. > > I am not capable as a human being of noticing the lack of one message, > when without this patch I would get more than 2,000 each day. > >>> The more likely is that the OP starts deleting the messages unread >>> each day and thus never sees an actual failure report. >> >> Failure of imagination. > > No. Having done the work to verify that failures will be reported, I > configure the mail system to only send me mail on errors. Better design. > >> Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script >> (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for >> expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages >> noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as >> well? > > This doesn't solve the "lack of a message" problem you mentioned above. > > It also requires a new system to be designed and configured, which could > have failures of its own. This is more abstraction and zero gain for > our environment. Any error should be read in our situation. A > non-error does not need to be read. > > In any case, the primary consideration with this patch is that it allows > either model to work. You can do it your way, and we can do it our way. > > --Jo Rhett > senior geek > > Silicon Valley Colocation > Support Phone: 408-400-0550 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGeYyAUR3pKhqN0EoRAgbUAJ93Rq0FwoYRZfL2PnUGaDHwl8jbbgCfcc22 uUkANgaHrRsY9RQrDKLUbKk= =N5D4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 20:50:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409DB16A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from home.c0mplx.org (home.c0mplx.org [213.178.180.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C0413C45E for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@c0mplx.org) Received: from pi by home.c0mplx.org with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1I16Mb-0003Zq-3l for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:13 +0200 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:13 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070620200113.GH13981@home.c0mplx.org> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:50:34 -0000 Hi! [on a bikeshed:] > >3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't > >have to delete thousands of non-errors. > > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages > noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as > well? Yes, that's what I have hoped for in the past as well. That script to analyse is not that easy to write, because there are many border cases. This script never materialized until now, and therefore, for the time being, I seriously hope this patch will be committed. -- pi@c0mplx.org +49 171 3101372 13 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 21:14:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741CD16A481 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57AD413C45A for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.67.240.119] (public-wireless.sc.svcolo.com [64.13.143.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5KLEYve021838; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:14:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: <46798C80.6020108@danielbond.org> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> <46798C80.6020108@danielbond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:14:27 -0700 To: Daniel Bond X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - jrhett@svcolo.com is whitelisted. X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 114558 - 7e662ca87e56 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:14:42 -0000 On Jun 20, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Bond wrote: > I like Kurt's approach Well the goal is to allow either approach to work. Kurt is arguing against this patch because it doesn't work for him... > having a mailfilter/script-pipe which could > remove dynamic variables like timestamps etc, and checksum it against > against a "empty" template to see if its deletable. > This also verifies that mail-delivery is working, and machine is > not dead. But thats where the logic fails. Show me a mailfilter that will observe the lack of a message? Nobody who is against this patch is making logical arguments... Yes, I agree in theory. If you have scripts that output a lot of data every time and you need to look for anomolies, then a mailfilter/ pipe approach makes a lot of sense. But that doesn't mean that this patch is a bad idea. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 21:48:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9251B16A46B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7985413C48A for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.67.240.119] (public-wireless.sc.svcolo.com [64.13.143.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5KLmvbZ022468; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:48:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:48:51 -0700 To: Alban Hertroys X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - jrhett@svcolo.com is whitelisted. X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 114574 - b6c28aa0c0ad X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Cc: Kurt Buff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:48:57 -0000 On Jun 20, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Alban Hertroys wrote: > Would it help if "everything is all right"-mails would be easily > discerned from messages saying "there is a problem"? Not for me. I would like to not receive mail when everything is alright. > IMHO that way you could move the "everything is all right" messages > into a separate mailbox which would serve as a coarse check > (there'd be about the same amount of new messages in it every day), > while the "there's a problem" mails would still stick out like a > soar thumb. The latter stick out very well when the former never arrive ;-) Obviously you are welcome to create such a patch for yourself. However for my needs this patch would be good. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 21:52:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A681016A41F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl) Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (solfertje.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFA213C4AD for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.internal [127.0.0.1]) by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FB0B8033 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:17:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.236.150.4] (hollewijn.internal [10.236.150.4]) by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E044F802E; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:17:46 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Alban Hertroys Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:19:18 +0200 To: Jo Rhett X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Wed Jun 20 23:17:48 2007 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 74,4679997c10034581612333 X-DSPAM-Factors: 27, mails, 0.40000, mails, 0.40000, result+code, 0.40000, could, 0.40000, but, 0.40000, You+obviously, 0.40000, From*Alban, 0.40000, right, 0.40000, Cc*gmail.com>+freebsd, 0.40000, easily+discerned, 0.40000, AM, 0.40000, Mime-Version*Message, 0.40000, "there+is, 0.40000, TO, 0.40000, both+make, 0.40000, when+>, 0.40000, never, 0.40000, an, 0.40000, an, 0.40000, (there'd, 0.40000, References*<20070620151306.GM45993, 0.40000, patch+changes, 0.40000, obviously+both, 0.40000, 10, 0.40000, output+from, 0.40000, indeed, 0.40000, 21+43, 0.40000 Cc: Kurt Buff , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:52:23 -0000 On Jun 20, 2007, at 21:43, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:40 AM, Kurt Buff wrote: >> Indeed, which is why this patch might not be such a good idea. In >> this >> case, absence of evidence is indeed evidence of absence, which is >> contrary to the general case. > > You appear to be completely confused about what this change does. > All it does is TO ALLOW (not require) the OP to disable the > spurious and empty output from successful cron jobs. > > If I get a message every day saying "No output", how do I know when > a failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that > behavior. Getting no message is equally useless in the situation > where no output was generated *AND* the result code is positive. > > The more likely is that the OP starts deleting the messages unread > each day and thus never sees an actual failure report. You obviously both make a good point. You don't want to get flooded by messages saying that everything is all right, but you do want to know when not every machine is able to send such a message. Would it help if "everything is all right"-mails would be easily discerned from messages saying "there is a problem"? IMHO that way you could move the "everything is all right" messages into a separate mailbox which would serve as a coarse check (there'd be about the same amount of new messages in it every day), while the "there's a problem" mails would still stick out like a soar thumb. I don't know how hard this would be, it'd probably be more work than the suggested patch. My 2 cents. -- Alban Hertroys "This person has performed an illegal operation, and will be shot down." !DSPAM:74,4679997c10034581612333! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 22:01:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B829216A421 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [82.208.36.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7224E13C43E for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C3E19E02A; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2FD19E027; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4679A3BE.9000807@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:01:34 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Buff References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jo Rhett , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 22:01:22 -0000 Kurt Buff wrote: [...] > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages > noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as > well? I think that topic is not about "how we can do it another way", but why this patch was not commited. This patch doesn't change current behavior, but allows operator to choose another behavior. Allowing more choices is always good thing, so I am for commiting this patch. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 23:03:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256DD16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zenture@argonath.homeunix.org) Received: from argonath.homeunix.org (239.Red-88-3-116.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [88.3.116.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6282913C46C for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:03:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zenture@argonath.homeunix.org) Received: from localhost (amsterdam [10.0.0.3]) by argonath.homeunix.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9D67303A for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:47:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 00:46:55 +0200 From: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jim=E9nez?= Solano To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070620224655.GA6458@localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> X-Editor: Vim 7.1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:03:20 -0000 On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 > >> > >> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/ > >> expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, many systems > >> to not get useless e-mail. > >> > >> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... > > > > I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when everything > > is OK? > > So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to complain? If you want cronjobs to complain you just don't pipe them to /dev/null. Reporting that cronjobs setup not to write to stderr/stdout are not writing to stderr/stdout is plain nonsensical. Right now the only meaning of those emails is "mail delivery is working fine". -- How fortunate the man with none. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 23:37:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF2F16A400 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahmoh@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE8E13C455 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahmoh@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so108423waf for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:37:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=uEUY0v2PtI6ZBSSLnNKbhX0d3ZV+3OcgaQqSJtJlSgZdkyAO65kxQLpajaNMg+xPzI2vskI5U0flJE2u2CmPpo7UzgaW1fG1C26kw17UQhsX35/U7y5FsCftmGQS3zJpNRepdIx2/ab5tU9ecz+3GeVJdbAmxVWNVe8co2AffDw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZK4LeNpHO2ywfukYNbvV5cm8t7Do3kVDYdDpDcJbl9vtMBcmri/lGPj9PqaXbTHm+tv0MgfXWlGswtDEuW8ThGesa3kNYahiCtjjb9Cve6qrC09N4BzJtOLyIS4NjKbG0EsrvspEK808fOzokx/UxgilcoUpNAdtKy10R03ir6I= Received: by 10.114.181.1 with SMTP id d1mr853135waf.1182381181324; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.123.12 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:13:01 +0300 From: "Maher Mohamed" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: I need to confgure Ati X700 to support dual layouts with the Xorg7.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 23:37:32 -0000 Dear reader ... I have been fighting for a while to configure the the xorg on my laptop Acer Ferrari 4005 Wmli, to be able to at least a clone of my laptop windowmaker on the Other monitor that i have attached to the TV-OUT but with no luck. If any one can help please do not hesitate. Thank you in advanced. -- Mohamed M. Maher From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 08:56:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7028316A468 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennis.melentyev@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110C013C489 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennis.melentyev@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 14so427106nzn for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:56:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oCbvzQbT/4pxZ3y77xcT/amSeXu/2orbOQ+UqRefcKQXbJEIWREVAweKM8LY6QjpMnl6XOA8iJcCImgEaAMU1RXSMYxObN75r7Fjywe2S+dvGDWtqs1c+a6UehJxlEHISQHNR2w02k4s9OdSijJ+9giqjkK17FjryYJbwh1Y/Is= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sxok2OjwZ9vY7PF0yPsk8vq6/kbztQ16FAc+/XAcyDRHps+BD+x63MhhTZpg6Iig9I4pQe5b0N/HY5gLZOAEk97jTJFM7jWuSGR/H6UHdL+GqlXwH7IxUxCJU+stZhk2w3b9UWLPlDyytwG6SSsQVXpXL60ca3P9Ff90RPKM274= Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr1327937wad.1182414698993; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.78.2 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 01:31:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:31:38 +0300 From: "Dennis Melentyev" To: "Kurt Jaeger" In-Reply-To: <20070620200113.GH13981@home.c0mplx.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> <20070620200113.GH13981@home.c0mplx.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:56:06 -0000 While I haven't seen any problem with patch itself since it just adding a _useful_ knob, I personaly managed to use procmail to filter most of that SPAM. My solution is not as CPU friendly as patch but 2000 messages is not an ultimate load for modern comps. +1 for adding the patch. Also, will not die if not added :) Just another 0.02UAH into the bike sched budget. 2007/6/20, Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > > [on a bikeshed:] > > >3. Actual errors *will* be reported, and *will be read* if I don't > > >have to delete thousands of non-errors. > > > > Perhaps a separate mailbox dedicated to this task, with a script > > (grep?) that parses the emails in that mailbox daily looking for > > expected messages, noting and deleting them, with unsent messages > > noted via an email and messages with unexpected content forwarded as > > well? > > Yes, that's what I have hoped for in the past as well. > > That script to analyse is not that easy to write, because > there are many border cases. > > This script never materialized until now, and therefore, for the > time being, I seriously hope this patch will be committed. > > -- > pi@c0mplx.org +49 171 3101372 13 years to go ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Dennis Melentyev From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 10:23:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903BF16A469 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c220-239-20-82.belrs4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.20.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A55A13C45B for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5LANhno001912; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:23:43 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l5LANgtg001911; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:23:42 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:23:42 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20070621102342.GF1144@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:23:47 -0000 --i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: >> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines >> in sys/conf/NOTES: >>=20 >> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be >> # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with >> # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising >> # soul to sit down and fix them. > >Yeah, that's almost completely stale for both 6.x and 7.x. Since this issue pops up fairly regularly, would it be possible to correct, tone down or remove this warning before 6.3/7.0? --=20 Peter Jeremy --i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGelGu/opHv/APuIcRAq6TAJsHAaNSIg1eoPOat6bZCaXj1+Nn0ACfUglW cPvs4Tzj1X54BR2iR1fJbyE= =c2tk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --i9LlY+UWpKt15+FH-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 13:33:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FB916A468 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443E413C469 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:33:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (zohwns@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5LDXLEk085663; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:33:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l5LDXKcl085662; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:33:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200706211333.l5LDXKcl085662@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, 000.fbsd@quip.cz, Kurt Buff , Jo Rhett In-Reply-To: <4679A3BE.9000807@quip.cz> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:33:27 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, 000.fbsd@quip.cz, Kurt Buff , Jo Rhett List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:33:28 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I think that topic is not about "how we can do it another way", but why > this patch was not commited. This patch doesn't change current behavior, > but allows operator to choose another behavior. > Allowing more choices is always good thing, so I am for commiting this > patch. I agree completely. The point of this patch is to add an option (remember: options are optional ;-) and the default is off, i.e, no change in behaviour. So those who don't like the new option don't have to do anything, and nothing will change. Those for whom the new option is useful will enable it. Everybody happy, right? I also vote for committing the patch. (Personally I will probably also enable that new option. I prefer to be notified only if something does _not_ work. YMMV, of course.) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd PI: int f[9814],b,c=9814,g,i;long a=1e4,d,e,h; main(){for(;b=c,c-=14;i=printf("%04d",e+d/a),e=d%a) while(g=--b*2)d=h*b+a*(i?f[b]:a/5),h=d/--g,f[b]=d%g;} From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 13:49:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2283E16A41F for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44E113C457 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1031042pyi for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:49:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MNLWE3TRJCJqGoR+ZsnpzBgdAGbGQCzyTyhxEiTwdXSk0mhTgl4SntoD7vapzQq7IUVk4r1g4HNwai+lfRkwETfXYhA2KdHDrCm9Z4UN3ivFzDlg07yn3DRaflABt4TLvVu4dvhxtVFIEec3Xh65KsnYHq9Zq9K+ARCj0aDAuY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eHPWp3k2wn3Znl+YaPAO3/hsKBgYdpDk0+6U2c6CmbF9/yzE0zbtsc2OF5wv3BNc5aPV3Q9DGQLR+m0BFdN0SEqH5EoIxVsUyXCGzo0X0K7BsESXIYzyT/yejhLxKxBMkB7730cxhygz549SOeCyeCJkT9ZQbqkBEp5ECXdNqzU= Received: by 10.65.139.9 with SMTP id r9mr3573080qbn.1182433756355; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.196.20 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 06:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0706210649r8188a52h11b8b4f903484d1b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:49:16 +0800 From: "Rong-en Fan" To: "Peter Jeremy" In-Reply-To: <20070621102342.GF1144@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070621102342.GF1144@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:49:17 -0000 On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > >> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines > >> in sys/conf/NOTES: > >> > >> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be > >> # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with > >> # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising > >> # soul to sit down and fix them. > > > >Yeah, that's almost completely stale for both 6.x and 7.x. > > Since this issue pops up fairly regularly, would it be possible to > correct, tone down or remove this warning before 6.3/7.0? Ya, how about this one: http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/remove-nullfs-warning.diff It just remove NULL from the warning list. If no one objects, I will ask re@ for approval tomorrow. BTW, since umapfs is disconnected from build, shall we axe it? Regards, Rong-En Fan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 14:16:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20AF16A421 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520DD13C448 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extazyti@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so472824wra for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:16:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=lqH5zdkxbhKziWouXK2qtS8jpUNed/qre/emDIYP5oeag6+CwzXSkY/6yZBSndgr4ViAIVxosV8WKXnjDOw/2wYB4f+2m7S9i++vgcBIEfxCs8lM+3UHB5vjZitIhhYW+cfsR9Jo1bgbjgOY8vF4u9bA8u62ru+yOhMrHQamsTY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=YovlrCN/2A1QB0oPA3GiDNJoLNczbztANXzxVrduIBtubRI7oJ61FXw11PXfZ5S2FxYZqTZafVZp/hyxWGOeHKxTgp5h4DL6iUV5DU5QLJAApBY73zMT50KglzrOASXJZwRvKCOKStOvk1dAECVaARh3LUM3I9BzTJgXuZ93Oao= Received: by 10.100.106.5 with SMTP id e5mr1085466anc.1182435359554; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.131.8 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <468d29450706210715m31c112acs1936dabf1b287d82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:15:59 +0300 From: ExTaZyTi To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Network Problem in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:16:01 -0000 Hi, I have a serious problem with my network. I have connected 2 PC's, 1 - FreeBSD, 2 - Windows XP. The problem is follow - My FreeBSD limmiting connections , I cannot open more 224 TCP4-Sockets in my Windows Box. When I downloading torrent file, I cannot create more connections to the web, and while this time I can't open for example - web sites. Tow problem who worry myself is when I scan a my freebsd box or other "server" for open ports its FAKE show me: 81 82 ,83 ,465,463 and other ports open.. but It's FAKE .. it's not really open.. I Cleared my sysctl, and test, cleared my firewall and test, re-build my kernel with any options changed and test again.. Just don't Work :(( I have use PF firewall and FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5. I Think this problem is from "net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2" in my sysctl because it's work before i do sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2.. but when back this option to value = 0 this problem is stay there.. and no restarts or re-build my kernel can fix this..or maybe be wrong to this supposition. Sorry for my english. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 15:57:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A7416A400 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3611013C44B for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0DAB1A3C19; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D98FC42A; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:57:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:57:38 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rong-en Fan Message-ID: <20070621155738.GA18615@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070621102342.GF1144@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <6eb82e0706210649r8188a52h11b8b4f903484d1b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706210649r8188a52h11b8b4f903484d1b@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:57:39 -0000 On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > >>> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines > >>> in sys/conf/NOTES: > >>> > >>> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be > >>> # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with > >>> # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising > >>> # soul to sit down and fix them. > >> > >>Yeah, that's almost completely stale for both 6.x and 7.x. > > > >Since this issue pops up fairly regularly, would it be possible to > >correct, tone down or remove this warning before 6.3/7.0? > > Ya, how about this one: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/remove-nullfs-warning.diff Maybe note that UNIONFS is being maintained now and is in a much better state, although there are still some issues being resolved. > It just remove NULL from the warning list. If no one objects, > I will ask re@ for approval tomorrow. BTW, since umapfs > is disconnected from build, shall we axe it? I would recommend it. Kris From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 16:59:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F5716A46F for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAEC13C48C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so1148866pyi for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BDzNLrLhWnADkJYtt2rJxGVJHwmx5kjS9RyFS+bmyVHTquvwzJbpXSfmVh0/Ayuc8buYBzujHLdYkdPr3HsFjgRgpq50D8KYzc5vrzKKMdCs4Mnj67DhaprXr0AxJGaq7pVyAq9Y1XXITl1Z9BBNxEh6k3+g9OkkcvDw6qK3saI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L91Nr/0V+2JfHmWCwY61LGm670I8qJ6EaEooLqYpFiXXZ7aGibKnpth7tyxRAlYVHxPQe0Wia4samsVEPd0JlQnSHDEF1l7/YLvOAiNSeiELc+EGctGeM1piqbRSeYj6Di/OBt9d9mBsP11m/dGOJPGzhY6kyWcBYQot1cCad7M= Received: by 10.65.95.12 with SMTP id x12mr3835798qbl.1182445171840; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.196.20 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6eb82e0706210959o4e5bce06l7c72f8b31bc3956e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 00:59:31 +0800 From: "Rong-en Fan" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20070621155738.GA18615@rot26.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070621102342.GF1144@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <6eb82e0706210649r8188a52h11b8b4f903484d1b@mail.gmail.com> <20070621155738.GA18615@rot26.obsecurity.org> Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:59:33 -0000 On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > > On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > > >>> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines > > >>> in sys/conf/NOTES: > > >>> > > >>> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be > > >>> # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything with > > >>> # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising > > >>> # soul to sit down and fix them. > > >> > > >>Yeah, that's almost completely stale for both 6.x and 7.x. > > > > > >Since this issue pops up fairly regularly, would it be possible to > > >correct, tone down or remove this warning before 6.3/7.0? > > > > Ya, how about this one: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/remove-nullfs-warning.diff > > Maybe note that UNIONFS is being maintained now and is in a much > better state, although there are still some issues being resolved. OK, I add them. See the patch in the url above. > > It just remove NULL from the warning list. If no one objects, > > I will ask re@ for approval tomorrow. BTW, since umapfs > > is disconnected from build, shall we axe it? > > I would recommend it. > > Kris > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 21 17:06:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E530116A46F for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D029613C43E for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:06:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BAE1A3C19; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 10:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0B70DC42A; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:06:01 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 13:06:01 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rong-en Fan Message-ID: <20070621170600.GA19886@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <6eb82e0706182246q6563ba03x31038082125b50ae@mail.gmail.com> <200706190124.38935.josh@tcbug.org> <6eb82e0706182339r6328f009sf66631f1570977ba@mail.gmail.com> <20070619065820.GA87172@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20070621102342.GF1144@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <6eb82e0706210649r8188a52h11b8b4f903484d1b@mail.gmail.com> <20070621155738.GA18615@rot26.obsecurity.org> <6eb82e0706210959o4e5bce06l7c72f8b31bc3956e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0706210959o4e5bce06l7c72f8b31bc3956e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Peter Jeremy , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: is read-write nullfs safe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 17:06:02 -0000 On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:59:31AM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > On 6/21/07, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:49:16PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > >> On 6/21/07, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> >On 2007-Jun-19 02:58:20 -0400, Kris Kennaway > >wrote: > >> >>On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:39:22PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > >> >>> I was asking about nullfs because the following lines > >> >>> in sys/conf/NOTES: > >> >>> > >> >>> # NB: The NULL, PORTAL, UMAP and UNION filesystems are known to be > >> >>> # buggy, and WILL panic your system if you attempt to do anything > >with > >> >>> # them. They are included here as an incentive for some enterprising > >> >>> # soul to sit down and fix them. > >> >> > >> >>Yeah, that's almost completely stale for both 6.x and 7.x. > >> > > >> >Since this issue pops up fairly regularly, would it be possible to > >> >correct, tone down or remove this warning before 6.3/7.0? > >> > >> Ya, how about this one: > >> > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/remove-nullfs-warning.diff > > > >Maybe note that UNIONFS is being maintained now and is in a much > >better state, although there are still some issues being resolved. > > OK, I add them. See the patch in the url above. Looks good to me, thanks. Kris > > >> It just remove NULL from the warning list. If no one objects, > >> I will ask re@ for approval tomorrow. BTW, since umapfs > >> is disconnected from build, shall we axe it? > > > >I would recommend it. > > > >Kris > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 02:28:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B6616A41F for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D7213C4B0 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1377A1A4F; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:28:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:28:51 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: r5TV8xaDQy0bEGqHjKKYRyi88epj3QnTDJj1k2jpQ04c 1182479346 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F943670; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:29:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <467B33E1.60100@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 03:28:49 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070407) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kurt Buff , Jo Rhett , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> <20070620203215.GA73521@eos.sc1.parodius.com> In-Reply-To: <20070620203215.GA73521@eos.sc1.parodius.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:28:52 -0000 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:56:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > >> On 6/20/07, Jo Rhett wrote: >> >>> If I get a message every day saying "No output", how do I know when a >>> failure has occurred? This patch changes nothing about that >>> behavior. Getting no message is equally useless in the situation >>> where no output was generated *AND* the result code is positive. >>> >> Currently, if you get no message from that box, *something* is broken. >> > > Daily Emails with no useful information in them will, by default, get > ignored by most SAs. I am playing this game right now with one of my systems. +1 for committing this patch. BMS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 07:52:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F9416A400 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23C413C45A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (fwnetw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5M7qXII034359; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:52:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l5M7qW8W034358; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:52:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:52:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200706220752.l5M7qW8W034358@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, matrix@itlegion.ru In-Reply-To: <04e601c7b356$b47cddf0$0c00a8c0@Artem> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:52:38 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, matrix@itlegion.ru List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:52:40 -0000 Artem Kuchin wrote: > Also, i use inode time because i only need files > which really have been changed. For example, > i you restore a file from a month ago it will have > a date which is a month ago. Then that backup > is destroyed but this file would not be backed up > because the date is too much in the past. So, we > loose the file. If i used inode change time the file > will be backup in any case. However, some > "stupid" programs like mysql or qmail seem to > touch files so, Pretty much _any_ operation on a file (except reading it) will update the ctime of the inode. So I'm not surprised that the ctime of database files and mail files gets updated often. (However, I do agree that mysql and qmail are "stupid", but for entirely different reasons. ;-) > for example, all mail message and > databases are backed up every time. And this sucks. Seems like you need to make a distinction: Use mtime for /var/mail and /var/db/mysql/data (or wherever your db files are), and use ctime for everything else. With find(1) and bsdtar(1) that's pretty easy: # set -f # disable shell-expansion of "*" # MDIRS="( -path ./var/mail/* -o -path /var/db/mysql/data/* )" # FLAG="/var/db/lastbackup.flag" # find . $MDIRS -mnewer $FLAG -o ! $MDIRS -cnewer $FLAG \ | tar -cn -T- -f- | gzip -c > $DESTINATION.tar.gz However, as you pointed out, it will not record the fact that a file has been deleted since the last level-0 backup, so it's not a perfect incremental backup. (However, it's sufficient for me personally. Another solution would be to store the output from "find" along with the level-1 backup, so you can easily find out what files didn't exist anymore when you restore the backup.) You might also use the "-print0" flag on find(1) and the "--null" flag on tar(1) if there's the possibility that file names could contain whitespace ... I omitted some details for brevity. Anyhow, it's just a suggestion. It works perfectly fine for me, but it might not work for you. YMMV. > What is still do not understand is what time gtar uses for > --newer option. > > Man page says: > > --newer date Only store files with creation time newer than > date. > > This is simply not true. NOT creation time defenetly. Sure? Did you test it? > It is either modification time or inode change time. Which one? You can either simply test it by creating a few test files and making a test archive. Or look it up in the source code of gtar. I don't have gtar installed so I can't tell. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Perl is worse than Python because people wanted it worse. -- Larry Wall From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 09:57:40 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4966316A46D for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from thin.berklix.org (thin.berklix.org [194.246.123.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB95713C45E for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:57:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A56A3.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.86.163]) (authenticated bits=128) by thin.berklix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5M9Q2C2027427; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:26:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5M9PoM6011013; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:25:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5M9PovR093323; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:25:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <200706220925.l5M9PovR093323@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, matrix@itlegion.ru In-reply-to: <200706220752.l5M7qW8W034358@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200706220752.l5M7qW8W034358@lurza.secnetix.de> Comments: In-reply-to Oliver Fromme message dated "Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:52:32 +0200." Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:25:50 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:57:40 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > Artem Kuchin wrote: > > Also, i use inode time because i only need files > > which really have been changed. For example, > > i you restore a file from a month ago it will have > > a date which is a month ago. Then that backup > > is destroyed but this file would not be backed up > > because the date is too much in the past. So, we > > loose the file. If i used inode change time the file > > will be backup in any case. However, some > > "stupid" programs like mysql or qmail seem to > > touch files so, > > Pretty much _any_ operation on a file (except reading it) > will update the ctime of the inode. So I'm not surprised > that the ctime of database files and mail files gets > updated often. I was uncertain what & when changed st_ctime st_atime st_mtime when I had to use SCO (ugh!) in 1990, as well as BSD. Not enough source then & there, & manuals were insufficient, so to observe, I wrote http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/statv/ More tools since, but might still be handy. -- Julian Stacey. Munich Computer Consultant, BSD Unix C Linux. http://berklix.com HTML mail unseen. Ihr Rauch=mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Dump cigs 4 snuff. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 10:19:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E96816A41F for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20BD13C4AD for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (rgfelo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5MAJdrV041861 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:19:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l5MAJdvD041860; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:19:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:19:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200706221019.l5MAJdvD041860@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200706220925.l5M9PovR093323@fire.js.berklix.net> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:19:45 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:19:47 -0000 Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Artem Kuchin wrote: > > > Also, i use inode time because i only need files > > > which really have been changed. For example, > > > i you restore a file from a month ago it will have > > > a date which is a month ago. Then that backup > > > is destroyed but this file would not be backed up > > > because the date is too much in the past. So, we > > > loose the file. If i used inode change time the file > > > will be backup in any case. However, some > > > "stupid" programs like mysql or qmail seem to > > > touch files so, > > > > Pretty much _any_ operation on a file (except reading it) > > will update the ctime of the inode. So I'm not surprised > > that the ctime of database files and mail files gets > > updated often. > > I was uncertain what & when changed st_ctime st_atime st_mtime > when I had to use SCO (ugh!) in 1990, as well as BSD. Not enough source > then & there, & manuals were insufficient, so to observe, I wrote > http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/statv/ > More tools since, but might still be handy. Well, this is FreeBSD in 2007. :-) All syscalls that change st_{a,m,c,birth}time should be documented in the stat(2) manpage. I think that those enumerations in the manpage are complete, but if someone finds something that's missing there, then he should file a PR to fix that bug. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the last time you needed one?" -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 11:42:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C908F16A46D for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xazkerx@mail.ru) Received: from mx28.mail.ru (mx28.mail.ru [194.67.23.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8428B13C489 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xazkerx@mail.ru) Received: from f102.mail.ru (f102.mail.ru [194.67.57.10]) by mx28.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id B4129DEDBD for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:20:37 +0400 (MSD) Received: from mail by f102.mail.ru with local id 1I1cVU-0001TF-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:20:32 +0400 Received: from [212.248.18.2] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:20:32 +0400 From: Xazker Xazkerov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [212.248.18.2] Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 10:20:32 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Subject: Have some troubles after deleting group of packages... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Xazker Xazkerov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:42:15 -0000 Recently I've deleted some packages on my server, those packages was installed on It at 21.06.07(DATE) by mistake. What to learn exactly which packages was installed on system, I used command "ls -la /var/db/pkg|grep "Jun 21" ". After it I've deleted those packages by "pkg_delete" command. Firstly it seemed all OK, but later I have collided with such problems: $ sudo tcpdump /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpcap.so.4: Shared object has no run-time symbol table I was trying to rebuild gmake, libpcap, tcpdump but it has not lid to positive results... Except for that, when I was trying to build hping, I've got such error: $ cd /usr/ports/net/hping $ sudo make install clean ===> Building for hping-2.0.0r3,1 .....random.o scan.o hstring.o libars.a -lpcap /usr/lib/libpcap.so: file not recognized: Memory exhausted gmake: *** [hping2] ïÛÉÂËÁ 1 *** Error code 2 $ uname -a FreeBSD fambox.ru 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Jun 8 11:00:49 MSD 2007 root@fambox.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ITHOST-p5 i386 P.S. I am very sorry for my cRoOKeD English. Best Regards, Roman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 13:18:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49A216A41F for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from thin.berklix.org (thin.berklix.org [194.246.123.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423EC13C46E for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A7C81.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.124.129]) (authenticated bits=128) by thin.berklix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l5MDI58E043700 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:18:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l5MDHkMg019209 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:17:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5MDHkGY098315 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:17:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <200706221317.l5MDHkGY098315@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Julian Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix C Net Consultancy, Munich Germany. User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:19:39 +0200." <200706221019.l5MAJdvD041860@lurza.secnetix.de> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:17:46 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.org Subject: Re: When inode change time changes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:18:19 -0000 > Well, this is FreeBSD in 2007. :-) > All syscalls that change st_{a,m,c,birth}time should be I added "birth" to mine, Thanks. :-) -- Julian Stacey. Munich Computer Consultant, BSD Unix C Linux. http://berklix.com HTML mail unseen. Ihr Rauch=mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. Dump cigs 4 snuff. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 13:26:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B7116A468 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018BE13C43E for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (ojuzmj@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5MDQa91051874; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:26:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id l5MDQa2B051873; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:26:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:26:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200706221326.l5MDQa2B051873@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Xazker Xazkerov In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.2-20060425 ("Shillay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: Have some troubles after deleting group of packages... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Xazker Xazkerov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:26:44 -0000 Xazker Xazkerov wrote: > Recently I've deleted some packages on my server, those packages > was installed on It at 21.06.07(DATE) by mistake. What to learn > exactly which packages was installed on system, I used command "ls > -la /var/db/pkg|grep "Jun 21" ". I'm afraid that was a mistake. When you install a package, sometimes new files are written to thesubdirectories of other packages in order to record dependencies. The time of those directories are also updated. If you deleted them all, then you probably deleted too many. To fix that, review the list of deleted packages (if you don't remember it, then try to look for the pkg_delete commands in your shell's history). Install any that might be still needed. > After it I've deleted those packages by "pkg_delete" command. Firstly > it seemed all OK, but later I have collided with such problems: > > $ sudo tcpdump > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpcap.so.4: Shared object has no run-time symbol table That's strange, because /lib/libpcap.so.4 is part of the FreeBSD base system. It doesn't come from any package. It seems that something else was also broken inadvertently, apart from the package deletions. What time stamp does that library have? You might have to reinstall that file from installation media (CD, FTP server or similar). Or, if you have the system sources installed, you can rebuild and install that library in /usr/src/lib/libpcap: # cd /usr/src/lib/libpcap # make clean depend all install > Except for that, when I was trying to build hping, I've got such error: > [...] > /usr/lib/libpcap.so: file not recognized: Memory exhausted That's probably caused by the same thing. > I am very sorry for my cRoOKeD English. You're perfectly comprehendible. I think your English is not worse than mine. :-) Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "In My Egoistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 19:59:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AFF16A400 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (kininvie.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BB413C44C for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) Received: from [10.66.240.106] (public-wireless.sv.svcolo.com [64.13.135.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by kininvie.sv.svcolo.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5MJxcfH059532; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@svcolo.com) In-Reply-To: References: <20070620151306.GM45993@therub.org> <20070620115023971992.49dc4616@kjsl.com> <20070620164749.GN45993@therub.org> <44A91A3E-96EA-46F3-ABE4-01C4662B5A5F@svcolo.com> <20070620200113.GH13981@home.c0mplx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <3A465CC8-03F6-42C8-9565-C24D7A3C518D@svcolo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jo Rhett Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 12:59:31 -0700 To: Dennis Melentyev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Spam-Score: undef - jrhett@svcolo.com is whitelisted. X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-Canit-Stats-ID: 115408 - 0ee71a340101 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 64.13.135.12 Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:59:47 -0000 On Jun 21, 2007, at 1:31 AM, Dennis Melentyev wrote: > While I haven't seen any problem with patch itself since it just > adding a _useful_ knob, I personaly managed to use procmail to filter > most of that SPAM. My solution is not as CPU friendly as patch but > 2000 messages is not an ultimate load for modern comps. Of course not. The trouble is properly writing a script that will recognize normal and not-normal output for thousands of different scripts. And dealing with any failures in that extra script. In short, this solution adds complexity without any improvement over the patch. I've been using this patch for 2 years now. Or, this patch for a year and a not-as-good patch I made a year before that. We push out the revised periodic script using cfengine. But I hate overwriting OS files, and I believe that most people want this behavior. -- Jo Rhett senior geek Silicon Valley Colocation Support Phone: 408-400-0550 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 21:09:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805C716A468 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3E5213C44C for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 43245 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2007 17:42:52 -0300 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 43231, pid: 43234, t: 1.2246s scanners: clamav: 0.90.2/m:43/d:3087 spam: 3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin: -last, FreeBSD Brasil LTDA rulesets: Yes X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=3.7 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.69.69.69?) (201.58.77.190) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 22 Jun 2007 17:42:51 -0300 Message-ID: <467C343C.60707@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:42:36 -0300 From: Patrick Tracanelli Organization: FreeBSD Brasil LTDA User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fli+freebsd-hackers@shapeshifter.se, hackers@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: UPEK/TouchChip Biometric Device problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:09:11 -0000 Hello all, I have used the mentioned devices on FreeBSD 5.4 in the past, and they worked just fine, but now I get problems with the same device, on top of 6.2-STABLE and also 7.0-CURRENT. From `usbdevs -v`, I get: Controller /dev/usb2: addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 port 1 addr 2: full speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Biometric Coprocessor(0x2016), STMicroelectronics(0x0483), rev 0.01 port 2 powered I have security/bsp_upektfmess, security/pam_bsdbioapi and security/bioapi installed. It is a 6.2-STABLE system from 2 hours ago. Listing bsp devices, I get: # bbdm -l bsp UUID {ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff} Example Vendor libbioapi_dummy100.so (BioAPI v1.1 Dummy BSP) UUID {263a41e0-71eb-11d4-9c34-124037000000} BioAPI Consortium libpwbsp.so (BioAPI Password BSP) UUID {5550454b-2054-464d-2f45-535320425350} UPEK, Inc. libtfmessbsp.so (TouchChip TFM/ESS Fingerprint BSP) Backend configurations: # bbdm -l birdb Installed BIRDB modules filedb Filebacked database (b-tree) plain Plain text file And now, the problem: # bbdm -b "{5550454b-2054-464d-2f45-535320425350}" -m filedb -c eksffa bbdm: Failed to initate BSP {5550454b-2054-464d-2f45-535320425350} And on /var/log/messages as well as dmesg, I get: All threads purged from ugen1.1 All threads purged from ugen1.2 All threads purged from ugen1.3 What is this about "threads purged"? Also, the port want libintl.so.6 while 6.2-STABLE has libintl.so.8. I have tried 1) linking .8 to .6 and also copied .6 from another system (also, 6.2-STABLE) to the current one. Didnt work both way. Same behavior, exactly. On 7.0-CURRENT things are worse. libpthread is not found, and the same command core dumps. Anyway, 6.2-STABLE is more important to me right now, since I need this device to work on FreeBSD for an ongoing project, but if a solution to 7.0 happens first my work can move to that version. Can anyone help me? Thank you. -- Patrick Tracanelli From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 22:43:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1F816A421 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@maxlor.com) Received: from popeye1.ggamaur.net (popeye1.ggamaur.net [213.160.40.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5F413C45A for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@maxlor.com) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-82-192-240-247.customer.ggaweb.ch [82.192.240.247]) by popeye1.ggamaur.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) with ESMTP id l5MMRAhQ099668; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:27:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail@maxlor.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D9F2E231; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:27:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at atlantis.intranet Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlantis.intranet [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T94LuK-mdFE2; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:27:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mini.intranet (mini.intranet [10.0.0.17]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3256F2E22A; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:27:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Benjamin Lutz To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:27:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <3A465CC8-03F6-42C8-9565-C24D7A3C518D@svcolo.com> In-Reply-To: <3A465CC8-03F6-42C8-9565-C24D7A3C518D@svcolo.com> X-Face: $Ov27?7*N,h60fIEfNJdb!m,@#4T/d; 1hw|W0zvsHM(a$Yn6BYQ0^SEEXvi8>D`|V*F"=?utf-8?q?=5F+=0A=09R2?=@Aq>+mNb4`,'[[%z9v0Fa~]AD1}xQO3|>b.z&}l#R-_(P`?@Mz"kS; XC>Eti,i3>%@=?utf-8?q?g=3F=0A=094f?=,\c7|Ghwb&ky$b2PJ^\0b83NkLsFKv|smL/cI4UD%Tu8alAD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3339767.erzMvl0mGk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706230027.04039.mail@maxlor.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 213.160.40.60 Cc: Jo Rhett , Kurt Jaeger , Dennis Melentyev Subject: Re: how much beer do I need to get this patch applied? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:43:00 -0000 --nextPart3339767.erzMvl0mGk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 22 June 2007 21:59, Jo Rhett wrote: > I've been using this patch for 2 years now. Or, this patch for a > year and a not-as-good patch I made a year before that. We push out > the revised periodic script using cfengine. But I hate overwriting > OS files, and I believe that most people want this behavior. Yes please! Cheers Benjamin --nextPart3339767.erzMvl0mGk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGfEy0zZEjpyKHuQwRAi7NAJ0VuV2Nq7jkY3VOBmnxziUJ63+27ACeNgoo n0zLyGyKRCaKAjCsABs2oI8= =Erko -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3339767.erzMvl0mGk-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 22 23:48:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D0D16A421 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7269213C458 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE83017F6; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:48:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:48:08 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 17rmlyoeFyRvClNxqS4cOeTSAiMwBRhlWRZwGKN8RJyz 1182556087 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C6218FE9; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:48:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <467C5FB6.70202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:48:06 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070407) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Xazker Xazkerov References: <200706221326.l5MDQa2B051873@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200706221326.l5MDQa2B051873@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Have some troubles after deleting group of packages... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 23:48:08 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > > After it I've deleted those packages by "pkg_delete" command. Firstly > > it seemed all OK, but later I have collided with such problems: > > > > $ sudo tcpdump > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpcap.so.4: Shared object has no run-time symbol table > > That's strange, because /lib/libpcap.so.4 is part of the > FreeBSD base system. It doesn't come from any package. > Was the PCAP_OVERWRITE_BASE option set in the environment during the port build/install? If so pcap could have been overwritten but I believe it *should not* record such an install in the package manifests, therefore it *should not* delete a file which is not owned by the package system. BMS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 00:38:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C6416A400 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from mail.1command.com (mail.1command.com [75.160.109.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF6313C455 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:38:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from mail.1command.com (localhost.1command.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.1command.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l5N0AIvO021581 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:10:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail.1command.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id l5N0AIBG021580 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:10:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from hitme.hitometer.net (hitme.hitometer.net [75.160.109.235]) by webmail.1command.com (H.R. Communications Messaging System) with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:10:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20070622171018.xpuevtgvuowkksc4@webmail.1command.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:10:18 -0700 From: "Chris H." To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: H.R. Communications Internet Messaging System (HCIMS) 4.1 Professional (not for redistribution) / FreeBSD-5.5 Subject: ctype locale: Invalid argument X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:38:57 -0000 Hello, I've been struggling with an error in a perl program I've been working on. Actually, I'm attempting to convert and enhance the freebsd man page cgi program - convert it to PHP and add some additional features. BUT, before I make the conversion I wanted to eliminate an error that the original perl version emits - ctype locale: Invalid argument. I've spent several days searching for an answer. On the FBSD mailing list I found only one reference. But it was Solaris related. Given that MAN(1) gets this information from ENV(1). I ran LOCALE(1) with no args and received the following: LANG= LC_CTYPE="C" LC_COLLATE="C" LC_TIME="C" LC_NUMERIC="C" LC_MONETARY="C" LC_MESSAGES="C" LC_ALL= Given I'm on the west coast of the US (-700). Is the above output correct? Should I have added something to MAKE.CONF(5) before build kernel && build world? Am I even on the right track here? Thank you for all your time and consideration. --Chris -- panic: kernel trap (ignored) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 01:43:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE1716A421; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E8A613C469; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp121-45-89-112.lns10.adl6.internode.on.net [121.45.89.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l5N1h4cT010821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:13:22 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 11:12:32 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <200706221326.l5MDQa2B051873@lurza.secnetix.de> <467C5FB6.70202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <467C5FB6.70202@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1443950.eeHyDyAnel"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200706231112.40616.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.312 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Xazker Xazkerov , "Bruce M. Simpson" Subject: Re: Have some troubles after deleting group of packages... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 01:43:27 -0000 --nextPart1443950.eeHyDyAnel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 23 June 2007 09:18, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > After it I've deleted those packages by "pkg_delete" command. > > > Firstly it seemed all OK, but later I have collided with such > > > problems: > > > > > > $ sudo tcpdump > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpcap.so.4: Shared object has no > > > run-time symbol table > > > > That's strange, because /lib/libpcap.so.4 is part of the > > FreeBSD base system. It doesn't come from any package. > > Was the PCAP_OVERWRITE_BASE option set in the environment during the > port build/install? > > If so pcap could have been overwritten but I believe it *should not* > record such an install in the package manifests, therefore it *should > not* delete a file which is not owned by the package system. It looks like the file was corrupted not deleted though.. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1443950.eeHyDyAnel Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGfHqQ5ZPcIHs/zowRAtiNAJ4hOYpexennWTKRH1G8an/H0YzTPQCfWGGc F9E6+jaiq33Ip3+CCLF1IU0= =fG1B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1443950.eeHyDyAnel-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 08:40:45 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD32C16A421 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe06.swip.net [212.247.154.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD4213C46C for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] Received: from [193.217.102.48] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO [10.0.0.64]) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTPA id 527404785; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:40:41 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:40:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 References: <467C343C.60707@freebsdbrasil.com.br> In-Reply-To: <467C343C.60707@freebsdbrasil.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200706230940.39928.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, fli+freebsd-hackers@shapeshifter.se, hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, Patrick Tracanelli Subject: Re: UPEK/TouchChip Biometric Device problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:40:46 -0000 On Friday 22 June 2007 22:42, Patrick Tracanelli wrote: > Hello all, > > I have used the mentioned devices on FreeBSD 5.4 in the past, and they > worked just fine, but now I get problems with the same device, on top of > 6.2-STABLE and also 7.0-CURRENT. > > From `usbdevs -v`, I get: > > Controller /dev/usb2: > addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), > Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 > port 1 addr 2: full speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Biometric > Coprocessor(0x2016), STMicroelectronics(0x0483), rev 0.01 > port 2 powered > > I have security/bsp_upektfmess, security/pam_bsdbioapi and > security/bioapi installed. It is a 6.2-STABLE system from 2 hours ago. > > Listing bsp devices, I get: > > # bbdm -l bsp > UUID {ffffffff-ffff-ffff-ffff-ffffffffffff} > Example Vendor libbioapi_dummy100.so (BioAPI v1.1 Dummy BSP) > UUID {263a41e0-71eb-11d4-9c34-124037000000} > BioAPI Consortium libpwbsp.so (BioAPI Password BSP) > UUID {5550454b-2054-464d-2f45-535320425350} > UPEK, Inc. libtfmessbsp.so (TouchChip TFM/ESS Fingerprint BSP) > > Backend configurations: > > # bbdm -l birdb > Installed BIRDB modules > filedb Filebacked database (b-tree) > plain Plain text file > > And now, the problem: > > # bbdm -b "{5550454b-2054-464d-2f45-535320425350}" -m filedb -c eksffa > bbdm: Failed to initate BSP {5550454b-2054-464d-2f45-535320425350} > > And on /var/log/messages as well as dmesg, I get: > > All threads purged from ugen1.1 > All threads purged from ugen1.2 > All threads purged from ugen1.3 > > What is this about "threads purged"? Also, the port want libintl.so.6 > while 6.2-STABLE has libintl.so.8. I have tried 1) linking .8 to .6 and > also copied .6 from another system (also, 6.2-STABLE) to the current > one. Didnt work both way. Same behavior, exactly. > > On 7.0-CURRENT things are worse. libpthread is not found, and the same > command core dumps. Anyway, 6.2-STABLE is more important to me right > now, since I need this device to work on FreeBSD for an ongoing project, > but if a solution to 7.0 happens first my work can move to that version. > There is a list called "freebsd-usb@freebsd.org" maybe we can handle this issue there. First of all, can you turn on more debugging in your "bbdm"? The default USB kernel is usually not compiled with USB debugging. There exists an: options USB_DEBUG I think. If you have time you can also try the my new USB stack: See: http://www.turbocat.net/~hselasky/usb4bsd/ Download the SVN version. If my new USB stack solves the problem then it is probably a regression issue in 6.2-STABLE, and as I recall there have been lots of changes. What kind of platform are you using? --HPS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 13:43:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFA416A421 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominique.goncalves@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D007913C43E for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominique.goncalves@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so1092609uge for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:43:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=b9K3J6D7u87Y2L3a4Wklnj1sa8TuNhGQqooiRDvkNrbqo1Kyu0rzUFt0beRj7PEMOdMpR3D55jXbL2exEF8TObDG8Tx2A8aJ1oLxbs29IYhjb2L/9N9DPtYR+aOFM2NBljRxKlAn2IuUzD0rw7PBflxxz5CvK6+Zdy+I9Q+Gmqo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=JnPYGcXGTIfk4aA0/L4RbvBgn1L797WOx5oj2QE5/vFfKwE4Co4Bs5gofXM7mQ0titYt/I864mlkbLpEufjRN8NmagYZdaPOsiwFMaitfKW+G/noPTSRLV27wYyfUfmykhc9lOZPp3YUrp3+8wWODXy7q1LCf6z/g34+4g2u210= Received: by 10.66.236.13 with SMTP id j13mr3577501ugh.1182604528462; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.236.12 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 06:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7daacbbe0706230615p4ee58c71pb345f1036eb37810@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:15:28 +0200 From: "Dominique Goncalves" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Unable to use my USB MP4 player: FreeBSD hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 13:43:49 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to connect my USB MP4 player to transfer some video and music files, but when I plug the player FreeBSD hangs at this point: Jun 23 15:00:07 lost kernel: umass1: vendor 0x10d6 USB 2.0(HS) Flash Disk, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 Jun 23 15:00:07 lost kernel: da4 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 Jun 23 15:00:07 lost kernel: da4: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device Jun 23 15:00:07 lost kernel: da4: 40.000MB/s transfers Jun 23 15:00:07 lost kernel: da4: 967MB (1982129 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 967C) I mean by hang that with my gnome session nothing happens when I try to open something and it's the same on a virtual console I can't login or type something. Everything come back when I unplug the reader : Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: umass1: BBB reset failed, IOERROR Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: umass1: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, IOERROR Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: umass1: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: (da4:umass-sim1:1:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x4, scsi status == 0x0 Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: umass1: at uhub1 port 5 (addr 2) disconnected Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: (da4:umass-sim1:1:0:0): lost device Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: (da4:dead_sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry Jun 23 15:00:25 lost kernel: umass1: detached Let me know if you need more informations. Thanks for your help, Regards. %uname -a FreeBSD lost 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Sat Jun 2 15:34:52 CEST 2007 root@lost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 %dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #1: Sat Jun 2 15:34:52 CEST 2007 root@lost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4200+ (2209.90-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x40fb2 Stepping = 2 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x2001 AMD Features=0xea500800 AMD Features2=0x1f,,CR8> Cores per package: 2 real memory = 805240832 (767 MB) avail memory = 770244608 (734 MB) ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 1.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 1.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 1.2 (no driver attached) ohci0: mem 0xfe02f000-0xfe02ffff irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: nVidia OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfe02e000-0xfe02e0ff irq 22 at device 2.1 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: EHCI version 1.0 usb1: companion controller, 10 ports each: usb0 usb1: on ehci0 usb1: USB revision 2.0 uhub1: nVidia EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib1: at device 4.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xcc00-0xcc3f irq 16 at device 5.0 on pci1 miibus0: on xl0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:24:f0:fc:71 fwohci0: mem 0xfd8ff000-0xfd8ff7ff,0xfd8f8000-0xfd8fbfff irq 19 at device 9.0 on pci1 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:00:0a:e6:ff:69:86:6e fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:00:0a:69:86:6e fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:00:0a:69:86:6e fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) pcm0: mem 0xfe028000-0xfe02bfff irq 23 at device 5.0 on pci0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f at device 6.0 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0x9f0-0x9f7,0xbf0-0xbf3,0x970-0x977,0xb70-0xb73,0xdc00-0xdc0f mem 0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 20 at device 8.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci1 ata3: on atapci1 pcib2: at device 9.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 mskc0: port 0xac00-0xacff mem 0xfdcfc000-0xfdcfffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 msk0: on mskc0 msk0: Ethernet address: 00:19:21:47:fc:89 miibus1: on msk0 e1000phy0: on miibus1 e1000phy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto mskc0: [FAST] pcib4: at device 12.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 nvidia0: mem 0xfb000000-0xfbffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xfc000000-0xfcffffff irq 21 at device 13.0 on pci0 nvidia0: [GIANT-LOCKED] acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfeff0000-0xfeff03ff irq 0,8 on acpi0 device_attach: acpi_hpet0 attach returned 12 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfeff0000-0xfeff03ff irq 0,8 on acpi0 device_attach: acpi_hpet0 attach returned 12 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xd0000-0xd3fff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/20.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. ugen0: vendor 0x041e product 0x401e, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 3 umass0: vendor 0x058f USB Reader, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 4 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2209902166 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33 ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master UDMA33 pcm0: pcm0: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x40 0x00 0x01 cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 da1: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da1: 1.000MB/s transfers da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 2 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da2: 1.000MB/s transfers da2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da3 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 3 da3: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da3: 1.000MB/s transfers da3: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s3a umass1: vendor 0x10d6 USB 2.0(HS) Flash Disk, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 da4 at umass-sim1 bus 1 target 0 lun 0 da4: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da4: 40.000MB/s transfers da4: 967MB (1982129 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 967C) umass1: BBB reset failed, IOERROR umass1: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, IOERROR umass1: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, IOERROR (da4:umass-sim1:1:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x4, scsi status == 0x0 umass1: at uhub1 port 5 (addr 2) disconnected (da4:umass-sim1:1:0:0): lost device (da4:dead_sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry umass1: detached -- There's this old saying: "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for life." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 23 16:07:22 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEA816A469; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1693813C448; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gavin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l5NG7L4q079784; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:07:21 GMT (envelope-from gavin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gavin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l5NG7LfZ079780; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:07:21 GMT (envelope-from gavin) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:07:21 GMT From: Gavin Atkinson Message-Id: <200706231607.l5NG7LfZ079780@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, gavin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/79266: [pci] [patch] RELENG_4 pci CONF1_ENABLE_MSK depend MFCed incorrectly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:07:22 -0000 Synopsis: [pci] [patch] RELENG_4 pci CONF1_ENABLE_MSK depend MFCed incorrectly? State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: gavin State-Changed-When: Sat Jun 23 16:05:52 UTC 2007 State-Changed-Why: Now that 4.x has been marked End-of-Life, this PR is no longer relevant. The problem discussed never existed in 5.x or later. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79266