From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 16:32:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEC91065672 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@harz.behrens.de) Received: from post.behrens.de (post.behrens.de [IPv6:2a01:170:1023::1:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490C48FC0C for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:32:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@harz.behrens.de) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=behrens.de; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=pinky1; t=1228062740; i=frank@harz.behrens.de; bh=r6p54UAm/qgLTCuMLFSqfCTP9KAu+FSqOfN8lDzTvAw=; b=HYUHtIgT94glepVsy8M3SZ7XSOJKybOWJ4AkYAOrpXkPFIgG0j2fquzDkrHjSUyyXRBu43vNFVk/SPl08fZEvA== Received: from [IPv6:2a01:170:1023:21:215:afff:fee7:af4] ([IPv6:2a01:170:1023:21:215:afff:fee7:af4]) (authenticated bits=0) by post.behrens.de (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP(MSP) id mAUGWAh6058442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:32:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from frank@harz.behrens.de) Message-ID: <4932C01C.4020609@harz.behrens.de> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:32:28 +0100 From: Frank Behrens User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <200811272118.mARLIdKH006580@post.behrens.de> <20081129165714.E61259@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20081129165714.E61259@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Hashcash: 1:23:081130:freebsd-jail@freebsd.org::zJI5XMmNB5m5n/1B:000000000YUA9 X-Hashcash: 1:23:081130:bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net::fGghR3Zyy3d9Yuwp:000UEg2 Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone interested in jail patches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:32:24 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Frank Behrens wrote: >> On the other side I still read in the patched jail(2) man page: >> "Similarly, it might be a good idea to add an address alias flag such >> that daemons listening on all IPs (INADDR_ANY) will not bind on that >> address...". Can you explain the current behaviour? > > I think this question is related to your PR kern/84215. Yes. > The current situation is: jails take precendence. So if sshd is > listening on inaddr_any on the host and on inaddr_any inside a jail > the connection to an IP belonging to a jail will end up inside the > jail; any connections to IPs not beloning to jails will end up on the > base. So we have now the desired behaviour. Your explanation should replace the (now incorrect) sentence in the man page. Please excuse my error, it is in jail(8), not jail(2). > Obviously if you stop the jail and ssh to a former jail IP you'll end > up on the bsae system and ssh would complain about different keys > possibly while telnet or similar things won't notice. This is expected and not easily to circumvent. Regards, Frank From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 18:25:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DBAB106568A for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E7A8FC16 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:25:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8980541C65F; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:25:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TiFBKnpaAOex; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:25:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 2D5B141C62D; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 19:25:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D254448D5; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:22:34 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Frank Behrens In-Reply-To: <4932C01C.4020609@harz.behrens.de> Message-ID: <20081130181856.W61259@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200811272118.mARLIdKH006580@post.behrens.de> <20081129165714.E61259@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4932C01C.4020609@harz.behrens.de> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone interested in jail patches? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:25:08 -0000 On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, Frank Behrens wrote: Hi, > Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Frank Behrens wrote: >>> On the other side I still read in the patched jail(2) man page: >>> "Similarly, it might be a good idea to add an address alias flag such >>> that daemons listening on all IPs (INADDR_ANY) will not bind on that >>> address...". Can you explain the current behaviour? >> >> I think this question is related to your PR kern/84215. > Yes. > >> The current situation is: jails take precendence. So if sshd is >> listening on inaddr_any on the host and on inaddr_any inside a jail >> the connection to an IP belonging to a jail will end up inside the >> jail; any connections to IPs not beloning to jails will end up on the >> base. > So we have now the desired behaviour. Your explanation should replace > the (now incorrect) sentence in the man page. Please excuse my error, it is > in jail(8), > not jail(2). > >> Obviously if you stop the jail and ssh to a former jail IP you'll end >> up on the bsae system and ssh would complain about different keys >> possibly while telnet or similar things won't notice. > This is expected and not easily to circumvent. Yes it is. You don't bind your sshd (or whatever) to inaddr_any on the base system but an IP exclusive to the base system. If the jail is stopped, you'll get connection refused instead of an unexpected behaviour. So what is in the man page is not entirely wrong. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 09:45:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA831065670; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCAA8FC08; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFB141C65F; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:45:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o4NBjlNclj60; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:45:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 01C8141C65E; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:45:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75A54448D5; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 09:41:46 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list Subject: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:45:09 -0000 Hi, as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit HEAD. See commit message attached. The bad news first: expect an update on the rc script to make the more obscure rc features like configuring IPs on interfaces when starting jails and giving a possible netmask work with multiple IPs and IPv6. The good news: In case you do not use those features or still only use one IP per jail everything should just work fine and there are no changes needed. More news: In case you want to use multiple IPs or a mix of v4 and v6 addresses you just give them as a comma separated list on both the command line or in rc.conf like: jail / example 192.0.2.250,2001:db8::75,2001:db8::99,2001:db8::55,2001:db8::14,192.0.2.254 /bin/sh or: jail_example_ip="192.0.2.2,2001:db8::2,2001:db8::1,2001:db8::4,2001:db8::13,192.0.2.3" In case you do want to start a jail without any IP, give an empty argument on command line: jail / noip.example.net "" /bin/sh Additionally you can give a jail a name now using the -n option: jail -n "bz's private noip jail" / noip.example.net "" /bin/sh You may not want to use special characters or whitespace but it is just a string, so you can. There are no restrictions and even 10 jails could have the same name. The jail (inside) cannot change the name. It's set upon jail creation and unchangeable from then on. What else is new: the -h option to jail makes it resolve the hostname to IP addresses and will merge those to the jail IPs. Note: that this can give you unexpected results on the primary jail IP. See jail(8) for more information. jls tries to be as backward compatible as possible. That means it will only show one IPv4 if called as `jls`; obviously this won't work well for no-IP or IPv6-only jails. This was done to try to not confuse scripts people have in their classic setups. jls -v will give you the full information, including: - state: usually ACTIVE. - in case you also give '-a' you will also see jails in other states, for example jails hanging around waiting for a socket to timeout but with no processes left after it was stopped; it will say DYING. - Every jail gets its own cpuset inherited from the process that started the jail. You can list, etc the mask by jail id: cpuset -g -j 8 or by set id: cpuset -g -s 5 Or even change it if you want. Threads within jails should be able to further restrict themselves even within the jail but nothing outside their scope. See the cpuset manpages for further information. The IPs will be listed in the following order: the primary IP per AF which is the first IP of that AF given to the jail command and then they should be sorted in ascending order. jexec now takes the optional jail name to attach to a jail but will refuse to do anything if the jail cannot be uniquely identifed. In case you use the jail name you have to give an empty argument for the jail id like: jexec -n "bz's private noip jail" "" /bin/sh You can also give both jail name and jail ID and both will have to match, else it will complain. Obviously only giving the jail id still works. The -h hostname option is gone again. You should use the jail name for management purposes now. A sample full jls output (admittedly a bit ugly this way): sun$ jls -av JID Hostname Path Name State CPUSetID IP Address(es) 21 sun / hangtest DYING 6 192.0.2.99 8 noip.example.net / bz's private noip jail ALIVE 5 3 j3.sunny.example.net /local/jails/j1 ALIVE 4 2001:db8::5 2 j2.sunny.example.net /local/jails/j1 ALIVE 3 192.0.2.1 1 j1.sunny.example.net /local/jails/j1 ALIVE 2 192.0.2.2 192.0.2.3 2001:db8::2 2001:db8::1 2001:db8::4 2001:db8::13 In case you have more questions the man pages do not address, or problem, etc. please follow-up to freebsd-jail@ . Regards, Bjoern PS: the MFC question was answered in the commit message so do not ask. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb Stop bit received. Insert coin for new game. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 14:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Subject: svn commit: r185435 - in head: lib/libc/sys lib/libkvm share/man/man4 sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/kern sys/net sys/netinet sys/netinet6 sys/security/mac_bsdextended sys/sys usr.bin/cpuset usr.sbin/jai... Author: bz Date: Sat Nov 29 14:32:14 2008 New Revision: 185435 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/185435 Log: MFp4: Bring in updated jail support from bz_jail branch. This enhances the current jail implementation to permit multiple addresses per jail. In addtion to IPv4, IPv6 is supported as well. Due to updated checks it is even possible to have jails without an IP address at all, which basically gives one a chroot with restricted process view, no networking,.. SCTP support was updated and supports IPv6 in jails as well. Cpuset support permits jails to be bound to specific processor sets after creation. Jails can have an unrestricted (no duplicate protection, etc.) name in addition to the hostname. The jail name cannot be changed from within a jail and is considered to be used for management purposes or as audit-token in the future. DDB 'show jails' command was added to aid debugging. Proper compat support permits 32bit jail binaries to be used on 64bit systems to manage jails. Also backward compatibility was preserved where possible: for jail v1 syscalls, as well as with user space management utilities. Both jail as well as prison version were updated for the new features. A gap was intentionally left as the intermediate versions had been used by various patches floating around the last years. Bump __FreeBSD_version for the afore mentioned and in kernel changes. Special thanks to: - Pawel Jakub Dawidek (pjd) for his multi-IPv4 patches and Olivier Houchard (cognet) for initial single-IPv6 patches. - Jeff Roberson (jeff) and Randall Stewart (rrs) for their help, ideas and review on cpuset and SCTP support. - Robert Watson (rwatson) for lots and lots of help, discussions, suggestions and review of most of the patch at various stages. - John Baldwin (jhb) for his help. - Simon L. Nielsen (simon) as early adopter testing changes on cluster machines as well as all the testers and people who provided feedback the last months on freebsd-jail and other channels. - My employer, CK Software GmbH, for the support so I could work on this. Reviewed by: (see above) MFC after: 3 months (this is just so that I get the mail) X-MFC Before: 7.2-RELEASE if possible From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 10:56:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D35F1065673 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801498FC1F for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from localhost by koef.zs64.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB1ATTJa049017 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:29:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) (authenticated as stb) Message-Id: <688EA2E2-DA27-4DD3-BD76-150551BB3268@lassitu.de> From: Stefan Bethke To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:29:28 +0100 References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2) Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 10:56:31 -0000 Am 01.12.2008 um 10:41 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb: > as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit > HEAD. See commit message attached. Thank you and everyone who worked so hard on this for so long! I shall proceed to put this into production this year, if I find the time before xmas to move the 10-odd jails over to a new set of machines :-) Stefan -- Stefan Bethke Fon +49 170 346 0140 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 11:06:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCE91065675 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A128FC0C for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB1B6vF6052593 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:06:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mB1B6vUs052589 for freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:06:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:06:57 GMT Message-Id: <200812011106.mB1B6vUs052589@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:06:58 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/119842 jail [smbfs] [jail] "Bad address" with smbfs inside a jail o bin/99566 jail [jail] [patch] fstat(1) according to specified jid s kern/89528 jail [jail] [patch] impossible to kill a jail o kern/72498 jail [libc] [jail] timestamp code on jailed SMP machine gen o kern/68192 jail [quotas] [jail] Cannot use quotas on jailed systems o bin/32828 jail [jail] w(1) incorrectly handles stale utmp slots with 6 problems total. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 11:46:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245231065670; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7E78FC12; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 11:46:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2CF93.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.207.147]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18C42E168; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:29:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0363182D69; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:29:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1228130978; bh=EbV3X1oWOWL/6mM7z13+cq9OVYb0LuRt2 /FqXZqgfu0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=QhvLQdGzOL0ay6jRC1wOr6Y0SeS6SKcZO6LctCu7sgYjGgaCNXKlSv0fLdgEfWOyW hUmfA1ujG2ux5MvIaxAdQ0Qyor7YFwWsSSi98rcnipIRviD8zR9gvrO2K1WCUqgYWKm XbCYD4pIrLAdXb3FIVfCLRPpPpPuirjY9+JQQ3fsq7fwZOMsiSYpgnHGyOVoDq2jwMk wdqWcU+CgapCegzr5MCRRkleKwjspgr0euBtr8tuL0Q3cWbgYbSiBJ2wH5qsqc1kITv tkuhTCqaUlACau85apFlISHlixP5Vt0Jgtodj7XLxX/WWVM8yN0Uxs0ZQ14kWCJGVFi 2Z2XPQJBQ== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id mB1BTc1j023993; Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:29:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:29:37 +0100 Message-ID: <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:29:37 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3) / FreeBSD-8.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: A18C42E168.004A6 X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, ORDB-RBL, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.9, required 6, BAYES_00 -15.00, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:46:49 -0000 Quoting "Bjoern A. Zeeb" (from Mon, 1 =20 Dec 2008 09:41:46 +0000 (UTC)): > Hi, > > as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit > HEAD. See commit message attached. Will this introduce changes how multicast is handled in jails, or is =20 it the same behavior as before (whatever the previous behavior was). > Additionally you can give a jail a name now using the -n option: > jail -n "bz's private noip jail" / noip.example.net "" /bin/sh > You may not want to use special characters or whitespace but it is > just a string, so you can. There are no restrictions and even 10 jails > could have the same name. The jail (inside) cannot change the name. > It's set upon jail creation and unchangeable from then on. Is this private name visible inside the jail (I don't need this =20 feature, so I don't care, but people should know so that they don't =20 put offensive stuff there in case it is visible inside)? Bye, Alexander. --=20 Since we cannot hope for order, let us withdraw with style from the chaos. =09=09-- Tom Stoppard http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 3 02:33:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C4B1065672 for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833648FC1A for ; Wed, 3 Dec 2008 02:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so3176648rvf.43 for ; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:33:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=gAKy5BSywuJvyXMqPdTso9iMwAQAWP4lfbcrFc3Upug=; b=VxcKGHCuzJGLG098hz3flw3MkP9pCAvo8v59JrU4SvCh3LHJS6gMkx/izBabMIGlSG JUOJubOrAV89kvhVWUQNGtX7xD0dGrAlL4kaUV29d03Bu/99Pz2Swk56VQOLpC43KjKd ythVBokhYLLET7RujtZErv1CiM08myUd/x4mk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=XJp7R741lJdulQ23w9DYZ5SsFvjS+tQk5/PDE0BgMQXmrnbmad2/K/Rk58WdL2CCms WOniP/TIKv0FGcz5Lxcvad1SM3srDRVjK1CX52rhtlz+k7OLlCXvyCXHndr70YL9hHQx ZVpbUACfRCk+5Iqsn0PUdnA/RLQkkE/9ZoKSM= Received: by 10.114.145.1 with SMTP id s1mr7770109wad.118.1228269623645; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:00:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.67.7 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:00:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:00:23 -0500 From: alexus To: "Alexander Leidinger" In-Reply-To: <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:33:05 -0000 as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE which according to freebsd.org will be in june 2009, which we all know how accured their schedule is, so, my guess is very well Q4 of 2009 (if we lucky), I somehow was under impression (and i guess i was wrong) that it will come out in 7.1, I have a server that needs to be migrated and really doing so without multi ip patch will be a really big ......... -- http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 03:46:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1D41065672 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 03:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE4D8FC17 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 03:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.194]) by fallbackmx09.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mB4J8qZd006923 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:08:52 +1100 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c122-106-215-175.belrs3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.215.175]) by mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mB4J8nmj018781 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:08:50 +1100 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1]) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mB4J8mWF098652; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:08:48 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id mB4J8mbo098651; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:08:48 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:08:48 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: alexus Message-ID: <20081204190848.GG58682@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VIOdPewhitSMo36n" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: http://members.optusnet.com.au/peterjeremy/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 03:46:29 -0000 --VIOdPewhitSMo36n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus wrote: >as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT Yes. >is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE There are two ways. The first is: 1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD src tree via your chosen source tracker (cvs/cvsup/ctm/...) 2) Follow the instructions in /usr/src/UPDATING to build and install 3) Test well on a non-production box in as close to your production environment as possible. Be prepared to feed back problems and test fixes. 4) Once you are satisfied that it works for you, place it in production. This is basically the same as any other FreeBSD release except that you should test more rigourously. Your second option is to take the patches from r185435 and apply them to your 7.x source tree. This may take some massaging (I'm not sure how much 7 and 8 differ in the affected areas). bz@ may be interested in your experiences. Then test and roll-out as above. >lucky), I somehow was under impression (and i guess i was wrong) that >it will come out in 7.1, It's far too late for any new features in 7.1 but the commit log says it should be in 7.2. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --VIOdPewhitSMo36n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkk4KsAACgkQ/opHv/APuIfbaACeOWujefq2E1KWzntNJY/owAI3 aEAAn3DtpjA263InXIF+6FbfDTTzfwJZ =BxPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VIOdPewhitSMo36n-- From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 09:15:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D721065687; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mail.cksoft.de (mail.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9236D8FC14; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E0841C60F; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:15:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cksoft.de Received: from mail.cksoft.de ([62.111.66.27]) by localhost (amavis.str.cksoft.de [192.168.74.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0KstfloCL0PU; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:15:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id BD95641C64A; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 10:15:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net (maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net [10.111.66.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F13D4448D5; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:10:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net To: Peter Jeremy In-Reply-To: <20081204190848.GG58682@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20081205085902.K80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <20081204190848.GG58682@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> X-OpenPGP-Key: 0x14003F198FEFA3E77207EE8D2B58B8F83CCF1842 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:15:09 -0000 On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote: Hi, > On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus wrote: >> as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT > > Yes. > >> is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE > > There are two ways. The first is: > 1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD src tree via your chosen source tracker > (cvs/cvsup/ctm/...) > 2) Follow the instructions in /usr/src/UPDATING to build and install > 3) Test well on a non-production box in as close to your production > environment as possible. Be prepared to feed back problems and > test fixes. > 4) Once you are satisfied that it works for you, place it in production. > > This is basically the same as any other FreeBSD release except that you > should test more rigourously. That's for running HEAD. I would be careful doing this on a production system if one does not know what one is really doing when doing this;) > Your second option is to take the patches from r185435 and apply them > to your 7.x source tree. This may take some massaging (I'm not sure > how much 7 and 8 differ in the affected areas). bz@ may be interested > in your experiences. Then test and roll-out as above. There is difference, though not much. Thus just taking the patch won't work but the solution was posted like 2 weeks ago: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2008-November/000615.html Look for where it says "RELENG_7". >> lucky), I somehow was under impression (and i guess i was wrong) that >> it will come out in 7.1, > > It's far too late for any new features in 7.1 but the commit log says > it should be in 7.2. Yupp that's the plan. And the reason it will not be in 7.1-RELEASE is that noone provided the needed bribing money. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2008-November/000619.html (not serious here). It's been just too late. Regards, Bjoern -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is not taking one. From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 13:52:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4894C1065676 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF698FC17 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with SMTP; 5 Dec 2008 08:26:14 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: alexus In-Reply-To: <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-EI4t+pX9vDdRRyxUVUTO" Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:26:14 +0000 Message-Id: <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:52:58 -0000 --=-EI4t+pX9vDdRRyxUVUTO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:00 -0500, alexus wrote: > as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT The trick is to bribe the right people to get it RFP'd into 7.2R. :) ~BAS --=20 Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. --=-EI4t+pX9vDdRRyxUVUTO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk5K/YACgkQCne6BNDQ+R+9eQCfRVFZzzxov4Wgck9iVKefyGnO 2v0AnjUE4aLlxdafu3CrkfB/a++0Hiki =xwwk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-EI4t+pX9vDdRRyxUVUTO-- From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 20:04:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C371065677; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E1E8FC0A; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B57F6D43F; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 19:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 72614844B1; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:47:07 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:47:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> (Brian A. Seklecki's message of "Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:26:14 +0000") Message-ID: <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:04:56 -0000 "Brian A. Seklecki" writes: > alexus writes: > > as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT > The trick is to bribe the right people to get it RFP'd into 7.2R. :) The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new functionality? If the former, it should not be MFCed. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 20:05:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8A41065672 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from collaborativefusion.com (mx01.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6DE8FC16 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2008 20:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from Internal Mail-Server by mx01 (envelope-from bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com) with SMTP; 5 Dec 2008 15:05:29 -0500 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20081201085229.D80401@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20081201122937.81475f0zhfsjya4o@webmail.leidinger.net> <6ae50c2d0812021800x791d2cfeh45d590de120f76df@mail.gmail.com> <1228483574.2805.499.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> <86skp2l804.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3" Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:05:29 -0500 Message-Id: <1228507529.2805.539.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bseklecki@collaborativefusion.com List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:05:36 -0000 --=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new > functionality? The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the latter. --=20 Brian A. Seklecki Collaborative Fusion, Inc. --=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkk5iYkACgkQCne6BNDQ+R8pNgCbBUN98uDRdIGwRyp0AROXaLX5 d+kAn3khdiy56r3w9bvyvnE8qWmMDXcz =oj/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DzfM9tDmMSlP+FSmvwy3--