From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 00:50:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F729106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 00:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADA28FC18 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 00:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JY9jn-0008Fy-0L for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:50:03 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:50:03 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:50:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:47:54 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: <7tc6t35of1jp07s0b72paqin7bbi898q3k@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Sender: news Subject: [7.0] Stuck at "md0: Preloaded image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:50:06 -0000 Hello I looked at the archives and the FAQ, but didn't find a solution: Using a 7.0 boot CD, FreeBSD gets stuck right after this message trying to install itself on a 80GB Hitachi Deskstart IDE drive: hptrr: no controller detected md0: Preloaded image ... bytes at 0x... I can successfully run and install FreeBSD 6.2 on the same host/hard-disk. Any idea what could cause this? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 01:19:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3CF106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@snap.net.nz) Received: from viper.snap.net.nz (viper.snap.net.nz [202.37.101.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63688FC21 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@snap.net.nz) Received: from octopus.local (102.109.124.202.static.snap.net.nz [202.124.109.102]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with SMTP id 378E13DA58A for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +1300 (NZDT) Message-ID: <47D33691.4030604@snap.net.nz> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:00:01 +1300 From: Peter Toth User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sophos Puremessage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:19:38 -0000 Anyone is running Sophos Puremessage out there on FreeBSD 6.3 or 7.0? Sophos has official support for 6.2 and just wondering if it's worth to risk 6.3 or 7.0 for a big production box. Regards, Peter Toth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 01:32:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF901065673 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comperr@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0708.google.com (wr-out-0708.google.com [64.233.184.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932C18FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 01:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comperr@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b72so2483027wra.6 for ; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:32:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <672f21c6-f8ba-44bd-b196-31412348a663@h25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:32:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.95.19 with SMTP id s19mr268980anb.17.1205026354759; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:32:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20080307195024.GC82940@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> X-IP: 24.45.43.202 References: <1f43c6f8-0c9b-45a2-92a2-3b51c731a5fd@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <20080307195024.GC82940@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 FreeBSD/i386 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) From: comperr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: subversion -make error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:32:35 -0000 make distclean && make returns the same exact erro On Mar 7, 7:50 pm, David Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 10:34:55AM -0800, comperr wrote: > > Hey - when I try "make install clean" on subversion I get > > "make install clean" usually works but it only says to build the install > and clean targets, doesn't say in what order. > > "make install && make clean" resolves the ambiguity. > > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@HiWAAY.net > ======================================================================== > Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing listhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 03:25:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA47B106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from nlpiport16.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport16.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799B48FC15 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuhHAFvn0ke9pQErPGdsb2JhbACID4hkAQEBATYBmH0E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,468,1199685600"; d="scan'208";a="56301141" Received: from nlpiport06.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.105]) by nlpiport16.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2008 21:18:16 -0600 Received: from dsl-189-165-1-43.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO morena) ([189.165.1.43]) by nlpiport06.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2008 21:18:15 -0600 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 20:18:17 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <58d1e8d30803041406y7a99b5acn9616efff83ac683b@mail.gmail.com> <58d1e8d30803041855r754efa3s62ceb5df4fec223@mail.gmail.com> <64c038660803050444j5bbb0863q53cc9b19273f29ca@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038660803050444j5bbb0863q53cc9b19273f29ca@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803082018.17817.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> Subject: Re: Printing with a laserjet 1018 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:25:01 -0000 El Mi=E9 05 Mar 2008, Modulok escribi=F3: > Did you upload the firmware to the printer? > > I'm not sure if this printer is the same as mine (1020), but I think > this is a dumb printer, which requires a firware upload each time it > is power cycled. Unfortunately in my case, the FreeBSD USB driver had > to be modified in order to talk with the printer, as it was not > capable of communicating in a USB compliant manner, prior to the > firmware upload. (Genius.) > > -Modulok- > I had the LaserJet 1018 and have the problem with the upload of the firmwar= e,=20 can you share what modification made to the USB driver? TIA maps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 03:28:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A6D106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5917A8FC17 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuhHAIbo0ke9pQErPGdsb2JhbACID4hkAQEBATYBmHkE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,468,1199685600"; d="scan'208";a="56565737" Received: from nlpiport06.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.105]) by nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2008 21:28:51 -0600 Received: from dsl-189-165-1-43.prod-infinitum.com.mx (HELO morena) ([189.165.1.43]) by nlpiport06.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2008 21:28:51 -0600 From: Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 20:28:53 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1101.63.65.46.186.1204732996.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> In-Reply-To: <1101.63.65.46.186.1204732996.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803082028.53856.mapsware@prodigy.net.mx> Subject: Re: Printing with a laserjet 1018 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:28:55 -0000 El Mi=E9 05 Mar 2008, Peter escribi=F3: > > cat /usr/local/share/foo2zjs/firmware/sihp1018.dl > /dev/ugen0.1 > > you might need to change your 'ugen0.1' to whatever USB port your printer > is plugged into. Before you can use the printer, you have to do that > above 'cat' command to load firmware. > > make sure regular users can use the printer: [chmod 666] > dsl:#ls -l /dev/ugen0.1 > crw-rw-rw- 1 root operator 0, 40 Mar 4 23:32 /dev/ugen0.1 > Since your printer is attached to ugen, this mean that you made a custom=20 kernel where you take off the ulpt driver maps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 03:29:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5641065674 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1EA8FC16 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 03:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JYCEI-0005qt-0Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:29:42 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:29:42 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:29:42 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:29:33 +0100 Lines: 34 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Sender: news Subject: [6.2] Fails downloading packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:29:48 -0000 Hello Since 7.0 fails installing on a Hitachi IDE drive, I installed a Minimal 6.2, but once done, its fails downloading packages: freebsd# pkg_add -r bash Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz' by URL Indeed, there's no /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/ Found it under /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/shells/ So... 1. cd /tmp 2. fetched bash-3.2.33.tbz 3. pkg_add -r ./bash-3.2.33.tbz Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/./bash-3.2.33.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/./bash-3.2.33.tbz' by URL Am I missing some configuration somewhere that would explain why 6.2 is having a hard time finding packages on the official site? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 05:10:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76881065670 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8122D8FC19 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE8D5089B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:10:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voyCxljuaU1Y for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:10:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2DEBF50869; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:10:03 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080309051004.2DEBF50869@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:10:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2008-02-17 - 2008-03-08 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:10:09 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 05:16:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2151065672 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from mail.united-ware.com (am-productions.biz [69.61.164.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C30C8FC1E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 05:16:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (adsl-68-250-179-2.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [68.250.179.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.united-ware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m294x7hb095035 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:59:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 23:54:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1715673.M6pTofpbkq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803082354.43446.mistry.7@osu.edu> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6171/Sat Mar 8 06:39:11 2008 on mail.united-ware.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Internal SD/MMC Card Slot Driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:16:38 -0000 --nextPart1715673.M6pTofpbkq Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I've got an internal O2 Micro SD/MMC Card Slot on my Fujitsu P8010 I'd=20 like to get working. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE amd64. I've got the=20 mmcsd and mmc devices loaded. But these aren't attaching to the pci=20 device. Is there something else that needs to be load for it work? http://am-productions.biz/docs/pciconf.txt none2@pci0:28:3:2: class=3D0x080501 card=3D0x143d10cf chip=3D0x71201217=20 rev=3D0x02 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'O2 Micro Inc' device =3D 'Unknown device O2Micro Integrated MMC/SD controller' class =3D base peripheral =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --nextPart1715673.M6pTofpbkq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkfTbYsACgkQxqA5ziudZT3+uQCfWsk+uACxv0vJk+Ip4NHe23s5 alEAn39c0kS5Kqj1zo9SGapMMg2A1liZ =4/oG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1715673.M6pTofpbkq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 06:39:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184EF1065682 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 06:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from quack.kfu.com (6to4.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4001::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BCE8FC21 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 06:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Received: from bacchus.kfu.com (bacchus.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4002:0:216:cbff:fea9:7b6f]) (authenticated bits=0) by quack.kfu.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m296d7ER013522 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:39:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@kfu.com) Message-Id: <0036C1EC-A309-4DB2-B408-5A07E02784B8@kfu.com> From: Nick Sayer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 22:39:06 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (quack.kfu.com [IPv6:2002:478d:4001:0:217:31ff:fee9:bc66]); Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:39:09 -0800 (PST) Subject: 7.0-RELEASE panics in ip_output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:39:13 -0000 Since upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE, I seem to get a panic about once a week or so. I have 6to4 set up on this machine, and the stack trace I get from kgdb usually looks something like this: #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:195 #1 0xc062e2a7 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/ kern_shutdown.c:409 #2 0xc062e569 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:563 #3 0xc084ce2c in trap_fatal (frame=0xe679875c, eva=76) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:899 #4 0xc084d0b0 in trap_pfault (frame=0xe679875c, usermode=0, eva=76) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:812 #5 0xc084da5c in trap (frame=0xe679875c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/ trap.c:490 #6 0xc0833d3b in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139 #7 0xc06f23b9 in ip_output (m=0xc4494e00, opt=0x0, ro=0xc3eabbc4, flags=0, imo=0x0, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:169 #8 0xc06ca751 in stf_output (ifp=0xc3ee1000, m=0xc4494e00, dst=0xc3ee5bdc, rt=0xc3fb5780) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_stf.c:533 #9 0xc077772d in nd6_output (ifp=0xc3ee1000, origifp=0xc3ee1000, m0=0xc4494e00, dst=0xc3ee5bdc, rt0=0xc3fb5780) at /usr/src/sys/netinet6/nd6.c:2123 #10 0xc07749f2 in ip6_output (m0=0xc4494e00, opt=0xc4089c80, ro=0xe6798a0c, flags=0, im6o=0x0, ifpp=0x0, inp=0xc3fb2924) at /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_output.c:927 #11 0xc0785a27 in udp6_send (so=0xc424d630, flags=0, m=0xc4494e00, addr=0xc3e4d880, control=0x0, td=0xc4246210) at /usr/src/sys/netinet6/udp6_usrreq.c:675 #12 0xc0681785 in sosend_generic (so=0xc424d630, addr=0xc3e4d880, uio=0xe6798bd4, top=0xc4494e00, control=0x0, flags=0, td=0xc4246210) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1240 #13 0xc067d74f in sosend (so=0xc424d630, addr=0xc3e4d880, uio=0xe6798bd4, top=0x0, control=0x0, flags=0, td=0xc4246210) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1286 #14 0xc0683ed6 in kern_sendit (td=0xc4246210, s=27, mp=0xe6798c58, flags=0, control=0x0, segflg=UIO_USERSPACE) at /usr/src/sys/kern/ uipc_syscalls.c:789 #15 0xc0686f91 in sendit (td=0xc4246210, s=27, mp=0xe6798c58, flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:730 #16 0xc0687031 in sendmsg (td=0xc4246210, uap=0xe6798cfc) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:922 #17 0xc084d405 in syscall (frame=0xe6798d38) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1035 #18 0xc0833da0 in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/ exception.s:196 #19 0x00000033 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) The exact details can vary, but the line where things seem to blow up is always in this code in ip_output.c: /* * If there is a cached route, * check that it is to the same destination * and is still up. If not, free it and try again. * The address family should also be checked in case of sharing the * cache with IPv6. */ if (ro->ro_rt && ((ro->ro_rt->rt_flags & RTF_UP) == 0 || dst->sin_family != AF_INET || dst->sin_addr.s_addr != ip->ip_dst.s_addr)) { RTFREE(ro->ro_rt); ro->ro_rt = (struct rtentry *)NULL; } on the RTFREE line. Is it just me, or is this something other folks have seen as well? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 08:25:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84B11065670 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dotyao@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4738FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dotyao@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so418361anc.13 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:25:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZxAkcxjyeCydXxtL6uFfly2Coj5PgQ2sELuUSyKZrqo=; b=vu0SucWLWN6Txgn4saxRQKc655BwxlqxJfLOFBWQ4XC6StFWMoM/zOwjIhJI9+wxL3sumyYrMvbdiyg11csvPICNNRpNraOvgJJzu+KwDZwm5ebZCCXLuFW5yk9KG4sS7o6u+G1mahXiyp0j1htDhQRGuWZICiGbprV23oz8KT8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oPlH3dj0DC+1/iOwCAqnj9UCiWRNHz59mhxkvYsQXkSzNsf03aDjpTp4JfegaJ3ypQE0av4GcOJ/7/VESCiUXZGUskHqaVodZskpfsFQhiAf3OoW2KMguTXGkKY1T0OyuYs9H2FFawDHWVtuIq02h0y2awZ1WBvjkAglGiklAZQ= Received: by 10.100.43.13 with SMTP id q13mr8224001anq.119.1205049549505; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:59:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from roy.wauee.com ( [222.49.92.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm12326818rng.8.2008.03.08.23.59.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:59:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47D40943.5080802@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:58:59 +0000 From: roy lee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Large numbers of Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:25:48 -0000 this is a web server,use nginx, Large numbers of Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec. I need help. dmesg： Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 14 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 9 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 12 to 5 packets/sec Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec ....... uname -a FreeBSD qz14253.tmdxy.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar 8 20:41:05 UTC 2008 roy@qz14253.tmdxy.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ qz2kernel i386 nginx.conf: user www www; worker_processes 5; pid /var/run/nginx.pid; error_log /var/log/www/error.log warn; events { worker_connections 10240; use kqueue; } http { include mime.types; default_type application/octet-stream; log_format main '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] $request ' '"$status" $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" ' '"$http_user_agent" "$http_x_forwarded_for"'; sendfile on; #tcp_nopush on; #keepalive_timeout 0; keepalive_timeout 65; #gzip on; include website.conf; } sysctl.conf: net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 net.inet.tcp.msl=2500 net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 kern.ipc.shmall=32768 kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 kern.ipc.semmap=256 loader.conf: autoboot_delay="3" kern.maxfiles="32768" kern.ipc.semmni="256" kern.ipc.semmns="512" kern.ipc.semmnu="256" kern.ipc.nmbclusters="32768" netstat -n | awk '/^tcp/ {++S[$NF]} END {for(a in S) print a, S[a]}': FIN_WAIT_1 634 FIN_WAIT_2 2192 LAST_ACK 52 CLOSING 1 SYN_RCVD 10 TIME_WAIT 16 ESTABLISHED 2959 netstat -m: 484/2336/2820 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 105/965/1070/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 105/919 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/ cache) 0/65/65/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/ total/max) 0/0/0/6400 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/3200 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 331K/2774K/3105K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 104/175/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 401 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 09:20:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96561065670 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F8E8FC19 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-287704.home.otenet.gr [85.73.171.118]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m299KAQx029393; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:20:11 +0200 Message-ID: <47D3ABD0.5090108@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:20:16 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roy lee References: <47D40943.5080802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47D40943.5080802@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large numbers of Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:20:14 -0000 roy lee wrote: > this is a web server,use nginx, Large numbers of Limiting > open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec. > > I need help. > > dmesg： > Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 14 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 9 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 12 to 5 packets/sec > Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec > ....... > > uname -a > FreeBSD qz14253.tmdxy.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar > 8 20:41:05 UTC 2008 roy@qz14253.tmdxy.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ > qz2kernel i386 > > > > sysctl.conf: > net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 > net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 > net.inet.tcp.msl=2500 > net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 > kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 > kern.ipc.shmall=32768 > kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 > kern.ipc.semmap=256 > > ICMP packets are rate-limited by the kernel, but you limited them even more with this: net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 This is the cause of your messages. Adjust it to about 500. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 09:45:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317841065674 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dotyao@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D790D8FC16 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:45:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dotyao@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so423800anc.13 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:45:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=autvQQTsOq/gdFzgnviMHOfYrA17xrKxCxKebKAp4Ts=; b=NNo2f2WgaWoNoBStwOKqYkvq3mRCcah/JwptIP/HnowX/BzW1ZU50ZMyzmS0Jh3s7gwDmVfHjc7xL/JLqqES3DTKPjdNlDIeKuZ3Ag6MSDbeLhBmdCBV8hSn2L5DPfpT5T/sAUylpV/OOLfoHNfXwRLGQe6VSwSuXt1iEf/kpUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=N+/FJhSETDOfTTKfdZMp1kUih//yUyhCJJEVDHECHtY4VNk+vbCueSlvbI9eh6CWNB75ZvGR8W0XcMJLuO/QX82P442J4cXcOvKrNZ9A6wmgef18pNYNOikbUfaUjsnxCzexov4FLB82ZL/7LKKBv4+ol2Ac9EIP/sg+YuG9ZJ0= Received: by 10.100.196.17 with SMTP id t17mr8561883anf.63.1205055954159; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from roy.wauee.com ( [222.49.92.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s54sm12533612rnb.14.2008.03.09.01.45.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:45:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47D42247.103@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:45:43 +0000 From: roy lee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <47D40943.5080802@gmail.com> <47D3ABD0.5090108@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47D3ABD0.5090108@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large numbers of Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:45:55 -0000 Manolis Kiagias 写道: > > > roy lee wrote: >> this is a web server,use nginx, Large numbers of Limiting >> open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec. >> >> I need help. >> >> dmesg： >> Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 14 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 9 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 12 to 5 packets/sec >> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >> ....... >> >> uname -a >> FreeBSD qz14253.tmdxy.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar >> 8 20:41:05 UTC 2008 roy@qz14253.tmdxy.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ >> qz2kernel i386 >> >> >> >> sysctl.conf: >> net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 >> net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 >> net.inet.tcp.msl=2500 >> net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 >> kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 >> kern.ipc.shmall=32768 >> kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 >> kern.ipc.semmap=256 >> >> > ICMP packets are rate-limited by the kernel, but you limited them even > more with this: > > net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 > > This is the cause of your messages. Adjust it to about 500. > > if sysctl net.inet.icmp.icmplim=500 ， the services will stop， twisted log : writev() failed (32: Broken pipe) while sending request to upstream From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 10:00:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3E61065674 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB018FC18 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-287704.home.otenet.gr [85.73.171.118]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m29A06Pj025494; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:00:06 +0200 Message-ID: <47D3B52C.4040304@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:00:12 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: roy lee References: <47D40943.5080802@gmail.com> <47D3ABD0.5090108@otenet.gr> <47D42247.103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47D42247.103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large numbers of Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:00:09 -0000 roy lee wrote: > Manolis Kiagias 写道: >> >> >> roy lee wrote: >>> this is a web server,use nginx, Large numbers of Limiting >>> open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec. >>> >>> I need help. >>> >>> dmesg： >>> Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 14 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 9 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 12 to 5 packets/sec >>> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >>> ....... >>> >>> uname -a >>> FreeBSD qz14253.tmdxy.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar >>> 8 20:41:05 UTC 2008 roy@qz14253.tmdxy.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ >>> qz2kernel i386 >>> >>> >>> >>> sysctl.conf: >>> net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 >>> net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 >>> net.inet.tcp.msl=2500 >>> net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 >>> kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 >>> kern.ipc.shmall=32768 >>> kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 >>> kern.ipc.semmap=256 >>> >>> >> ICMP packets are rate-limited by the kernel, but you limited them >> even more with this: >> >> net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 >> >> This is the cause of your messages. Adjust it to about 500. >> >> > if sysctl net.inet.icmp.icmplim=500 ， the services will stop， > twisted log : writev() failed (32: Broken pipe) while sending request > to upstream This is weird. We use 500 on a production web server (large torrent site). Kernel default is 200, you may wish to use this value. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 10:25:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E461065671 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B398FC16; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47D3BB0E.7000507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:25:18 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gilles References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [6.2] Fails downloading packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:25:19 -0000 Gilles wrote: > Hello > > Since 7.0 fails installing on a Hitachi IDE drive, I installed a > Minimal 6.2, but once done, its fails downloading packages: > > freebsd# pkg_add -r bash > > Error: FTP Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch > 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz' > by URL > > Indeed, there's no > /pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/ They were presumably removed for space reasons (6.3 is the latest release). You can use ftp-archive or switch to the latest packages (packages-6-stable). Use PACKAGESITE or related environment variables to do this, see the pkg_add manpage. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 10:26:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD691065672 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:26:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B258FC18; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47D3BB5A.7090001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:26:34 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Sayer References: <0036C1EC-A309-4DB2-B408-5A07E02784B8@kfu.com> In-Reply-To: <0036C1EC-A309-4DB2-B408-5A07E02784B8@kfu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0-RELEASE panics in ip_output X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:26:36 -0000 Nick Sayer wrote: > Since upgrading to 7.0-RELEASE, I seem to get a panic about once a week > or so. > > I have 6to4 set up on this machine, and the stack trace I get from kgdb > usually looks something like this: Best to send this to freebsd-net@ instead, and file a PR if it doesnt get picked up right away. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 10:39:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9493106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dotyao@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667958FC18 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dotyao@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1456934wxd.7 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:39:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Z4JRAV393nPGxwYlrmQtO2c8xf14/GRW0XFdz6G+skU=; b=oMWCyGbLnpOSzQenRLT9PTYYengza346uc5Z5xl6Z4mf/hBLL7+7cppsFjhp16wUr1SAnxVA+/elA30FfXX+Yk2S56GMVeYjPFNRx3czB5apbbnOVKn4WfboOpRRxVWOp0+DAHBKPx5ro8tVphLIpby2mJLHEspxfq68sfdbFLQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U0MuVUIeWwgnsE2KgUBIDvaGopWl+9dy4TvXPcqkXp70Uimk/fZnuY1unRESU/i+4J6KT48+g9hEw+WNdSUeXYNC7CQG2gIy73cWD4nRcAzfNYvnTwKB2Tm7Hs//hfn+4UGEyt+7tfjo7ClvlbbMiUGxGNBWRg5jP4lnv4CYHcc= Received: by 10.100.167.3 with SMTP id p3mr8524234ane.90.1205059166794; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from roy.wauee.com ( [222.49.92.171]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i52sm12591605rne.9.2008.03.09.03.39.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47D42ED2.20605@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:39:14 +0000 From: roy lee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <47D40943.5080802@gmail.com> <47D3ABD0.5090108@otenet.gr> <47D42247.103@gmail.com> <47D3B52C.4040304@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47D3B52C.4040304@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Large numbers of Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:39:27 -0000 Manolis Kiagias 写道: > roy lee wrote: >> Manolis Kiagias 写道: >>> >>> >>> roy lee wrote: >>>> this is a web server,use nginx, Large numbers of Limiting >>>> open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec. >>>> >>>> I need help. >>>> >>>> dmesg： >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 8 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 7 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 14 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 11 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 9 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 12 to 5 packets/sec >>>> Limiting open port RST response from 6 to 5 packets/sec >>>> ....... >>>> >>>> uname -a >>>> FreeBSD qz14253.tmdxy.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sat Mar >>>> 8 20:41:05 UTC 2008 roy@qz14253.tmdxy.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ >>>> qz2kernel i386 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> sysctl.conf: >>>> net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1 >>>> net.inet.icmp.log_redirect=1 >>>> net.inet.tcp.msl=2500 >>>> net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 >>>> kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 >>>> kern.ipc.shmall=32768 >>>> kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 >>>> kern.ipc.semmap=256 >>>> >>>> >>> ICMP packets are rate-limited by the kernel, but you limited them >>> even more with this: >>> >>> net.inet.icmp.icmplim=5 >>> >>> This is the cause of your messages. Adjust it to about 500. >>> >>> >> if sysctl net.inet.icmp.icmplim=500 ， the services will stop， >> twisted log : writev() failed (32: Broken pipe) while sending request >> to upstream > This is weird. We use 500 on a production web server (large torrent > site). Kernel default is 200, you may wish to use this value. > > Revised to 200,At present normal,I will continue to follow. thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 11:55:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF271065675 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nuambenzina@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D23D8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nuambenzina@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1636258waf.3 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:55:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=rppShcEd11iuY6XLfU30uxnH2kY8pYAT+LfJZc7BiNg=; b=bHEkj5PpBxiK0gJgjBzDN/+KjmZ6q1uCG5n/DDNY7USjlQMKLQUtfRdxGjMGRIeKGVfbpkuubG+PiOcn5wNrJ+RrJB8SMyzXFvfGVp6A/a1FjnCHKE0ImPlir1mrHL176rBnrcwKi3O/IVtrrfnLCu3hIMFNab8NClO++6A16Uc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=b/RjtZK0wiCmVglnjtoA0x5h3yWGhngIqnW/8vyasNJoLsNvTr4XvSyuFSZcWtRGP+AhzHAXttUN+ZiPPCPG/krxgy4kzAK/pKoz31K9eFnsvG2gTaxrtQQH2uh63r/5ACZbJ+6x+0MoycqMaRbVXvn8DZKgWSdIN0MqDHfzLag= Received: by 10.114.144.1 with SMTP id r1mr1754761wad.53.1205062097440; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.77.9 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4bdb2e0b0803090428j60c67b54q8fc74f415d316cf4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:28:17 +0200 From: "Marcel Cuculici" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: CPU Frequency Scaling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:55:25 -0000 Hello everyone! My system hardware is Asus P5B with Intel Core Duo 2 e6600. I installed on it freeBSD 7.0 Release yesterday, but I don`t understand something. In Gnome there is CPU Frequency Scaling Monitor Witch it`s set to Performance, and the Cpu freq. is 2.39 Ghz, I can change it MANUALLY to other freq as can bee see it in the link`s above, but can not set to Economy :| In bios I have Intel Speed Step Enabled, and Cpu Freq set to AUTO. However, in Windows XP, my power scheme is set to Minimal Power Management And the cpu freq stay at 1.58-1.60, and when computer need more cpu power it AUTOMATICALY jump`s to 2.40 Ghz. The same thing happen`s in Ubuntu linux 7.10 and Debian Etch, the Cpu stay at ~1.60 Ghz and it jump`s auto when more Cpu resources is needed. I don`t undersntand why in linux and windows the cpu is automatically controlled by operating system and in freeBSD I need to set it manually. How can be this changed for freeBSD, to act as windows/linux at cpu freq scaling chapter? Thank`s in advance, and have a nice day! :) freeBSD Cpu Freq ScreenShot http://img291.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshotda4.png http://img87.imageshack.us/my.php?image=screenshot1yc6.png CPU settings Bios ScreenShot http://img99.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cartilasala0017nb9.jpg http://img100.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cartilasala0017fkq7.jpg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 12:02:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D1F106567B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECF98FC16 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:62469 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JYKEb-0007dJ-7J for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:02:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 92665 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2008 13:02:30 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 9 Mar 2008 13:02:30 +0100 Received: (qmail 16339 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Mar 2008 13:02:30 +0100 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:02:30 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Marcel Cuculici Message-ID: <20080309120230.GA16246@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Marcel Cuculici , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4bdb2e0b0803090428j60c67b54q8fc74f415d316cf4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4bdb2e0b0803090428j60c67b54q8fc74f415d316cf4@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JYKEb-0007dJ-7J. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JYKEb-0007dJ-7J 01a4afbce44dda37f33407b116735486 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPU Frequency Scaling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:02:39 -0000 On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:28:17PM +0200, Marcel Cuculici wrote: > Hello everyone! My system hardware is Asus P5B with Intel Core Duo 2 e6600. > I installed on it freeBSD 7.0 Release yesterday, but I don`t understand > something. In Gnome there is CPU Frequency Scaling Monitor Witch it`s set to > Performance, and the Cpu freq. is 2.39 Ghz, I can change it MANUALLY to > other freq as can bee see it in the link`s above, but can not set to Economy > :| > > In bios I have Intel Speed Step Enabled, and Cpu Freq set to AUTO. > > However, in Windows XP, my power scheme is set to Minimal Power Management > And the cpu freq stay at 1.58-1.60, and when computer need more cpu power > it AUTOMATICALY jump`s to 2.40 Ghz. > The same thing happen`s in Ubuntu linux 7.10 and Debian Etch, the Cpu stay > at ~1.60 Ghz and it jump`s auto when more Cpu resources is needed. > > I don`t undersntand why in linux and windows the cpu is automatically > controlled by operating system and in freeBSD I need to set it manually. How > can be this changed for freeBSD, to act as windows/linux at cpu freq scaling > chapter? You can have it done automatically on FreeBSD too. First you need to have 'device cpufreq' in your kernel config or load the cpufreq kernel module with "kldload cpufreq". If you can change the frequency manually, then this is probably already done. Then you need to run the powerd(8) daemon. It can be enabled to start automatically at boot time by putting the line 'powerd_enable="YES"' in /etc/rc.conf -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 12:07:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1771065673 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mullated@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB0A8FC14 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mullated@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1642746waf.3 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 05:07:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=7w0mbdLgYDr/Hxx2lsztxRKhtW7ckKFlXcBwq+Ik+XI=; b=MvTe0BF0nWjf/ttOXqGOzg8oNsquiRKMiqt5O7NMKUtTkPVTP5Cxd18tgkyBkbMpDFpqBHFjkoWmypp9yy+96qCItuDXt9ayvTUODtJ73jMf5D8MGWLS5FGA2z7od+SUBhshBosqTW+t3Fb/TxL/PMf223TQ7P5thHuJN5oWakA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=EN+jklJvmD7T0WSDeHWvtInlC6Q4oFdMs11RI0mrOaUMj6Y3PzNVvcSRU5BjqTadNlIL+GRTb9XNZATmowmBz6fgRbKw6RRbGZfKtBIlvsHqpXp6bHon1uk9KjtViSSSVkb0q/RMDT9W7YBUX+u7L6cSsAn3rSXn98r/1Y24ldQ= Received: by 10.115.58.1 with SMTP id l1mr1772549wak.110.1205062914067; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.12 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 04:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <35e542ab0803090441j66464273kfdb8656d1c633114@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:41:54 +0200 From: "Viktor Penkov" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ext3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:07:53 -0000 Hi everybody!!!I've installed the new release of fbsd, but I can't mount my ext3 partitions.can somebody help me with this? best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 12:23:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D91D106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACC58FC1B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from joshua.ath.cx (athedsl-305854.home.otenet.gr [85.73.242.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m29CNEs3029787; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:23:14 +0200 Message-ID: <47D3D6B2.9020102@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:23:14 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080108) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Viktor Penkov References: <35e542ab0803090441j66464273kfdb8656d1c633114@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <35e542ab0803090441j66464273kfdb8656d1c633114@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ext3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:23:17 -0000 Viktor Penkov wrote: > Hi everybody!!!I've installed the new release of fbsd, but I can't mount my > ext3 partitions.can somebody help me with this? > best regards > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Have a look at man 5 ext2fs for instructions. You will have to mount ext3 as ext2. This is possible as long as the ext3 filesystem is not "dirty" (i.e. the journal is clean, meaning the volume was properly dismounted last time you used it). Mind you, IIRC, if you write something to the disk while it is mounted as ext2, it will probably go through a long fsck next time you reboot into Linux (assuming you are sharing this partition between Linux and FreeBSD). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 12:34:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209831065672 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:34:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0218FC1F for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:34:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7B62842F for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DC70A1CC49; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:34:18 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <15921128.post@talk.nabble.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:34:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <15921128.post@talk.nabble.com> (Ofloo's message of "Sat\, 8 Mar 2008 14\:09\:27 -0800 \(PST\)") Message-ID: <44bq5om5yt.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:34:23 -0000 Ofloo writes: > When using 6to4 extensively the system crashes I've never had this with gif > tunnels though every since I've started using 6to4 and stf interface this > happens especially when the v6 gateway is unreachable for short time, .. > > I haven't seen the error yet but I do know i had this before, well it's not > showing in the /var/log/all.log nor /var/log/messages, however I do remember > something about non-sleeping thread or something.. > > If anyone needs more info let me know I'll be more then happy to provide a > system to test on if required currently i have 3 exact systems which have > this issue. See the kernel debugging section in the Developers' Handbook. You don't mention what version you're running, but you may want to update to something recent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 12:40:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D80B106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E338FC14 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from Lowell-Desk.lan (Lowell-Desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C911228430; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by Lowell-Desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5D5F11CC34; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:40:37 -0400 (EDT) To: comperr References: <1f43c6f8-0c9b-45a2-92a2-3b51c731a5fd@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:40:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1f43c6f8-0c9b-45a2-92a2-3b51c731a5fd@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> (comperr@gmail.com's message of "Fri\, 7 Mar 2008 10\:34\:55 -0800 \(PST\)") Message-ID: <447igcm5oa.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: subversion -make error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:40:40 -0000 comperr writes: > Hey - when I try "make install clean" on subversion I get > sr/local/bin/ifnames-2.61 AUTOM4TE=/usr/local/bin/autom4te-2.61 > AUTORECONF=/usr/local/bin/autoreconf-2.61 AUTOSCAN=/usr/local/bin/ > autoscan-2.61 AUTOUPDATE=/usr/local/bin/autoupdate-2.61 > AUTOCONF_VERSION=261 LIBTOOL=/usr/local/bin/libtool LIBTOOLIZE=/usr/ > local/bin/libtoolize LIBTOOL_M4=/usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 > lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=262144 /bin/sh ./buildconf > buildconf: checking installation... > buildconf: python not found. > You need python installed > to build APR from SVN. > *** Error code 1 > > This is when I know I have python installed Is python installed from the ports system? What does "which python" tell you? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 13:47:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86F21065670 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik.mlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8673D8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:47:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik.mlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so956443rvb.43 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:47:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=1v02F3pUDNI3OUPMVniHIN6Fnia8qKWfFeKRXl3y2i8=; b=BnqyDPeFsqqk32SVwkFr/E8JKk40ecnjwkHdpKHmFI6wKkGBZrYzLr1Lp4qLjlMmLEOsb3/ZTL6uN2kd38e2zjru9Ue/SYn86Q9QE7wIN5kyP1+9MR/uXijWROjwVdTjByc1x6f0LEzv6A2ERjZXeG4EkvzLiB8Iu3hSAO/bh6c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=wa9G5AgEeNS76gXyrlTJN5ACt7mWVpqHyJrxMEb33YwJ8ZZUq07GpJJifMM4Yq9rUKlcPsLxYnpJJgKVzYwokOyAZvvxm4yvScCLU5KuztZadpe6TbCIS4JujcrEmkt84nks9eDHVEaLD6SMX/zsqlShgW8pVdo3I8zOMaoXYPc= Received: by 10.141.193.1 with SMTP id v1mr2413186rvp.73.1205068927413; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.141.10 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:22:07 -0400 From: "erik Wilson" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Help with pf ruleset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:47:00 -0000 I'm pulling my hair out here. I've been working on this for days without any success. I've whittled the ruleset down to the barest possible rules and even that doesn't work. I'm at my wits end. I would really appreciate it if someone could show me where i'm being a complete and total moron. Here's the situation. I have a somewhat unique environment. It consists of 2 WAN's, an internal LAN, and numerous VLANS (isolated clients, which need to be accessible from the internet, but not to each other). This runs in a VMWare esx server, but that's not really important. FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE em0 = lan (10.0.0.x) em2 = WAN1 (y.y.y.y) (dhcp) em3 = WAN2 (x.x.x.x) (static /28 subnet) the default gateway is on nic2. nic3 will need to forward ip:port's to various vlans. nic2 is used for all outbound lan traffic (internet). nic2 will need to failover to nic3 eventually, and nic3 will have to failover to nic2 (for outbound, obviously no choice for inbound). So here's the problem. I can't even get nic2 or nic3 to respond to a ping request from outside my network when pf is enabled. I know the interfaces are set up correct, as I can ping the default gateways of both interfaces. Also, outbound NAT works perfectly on wan1. Here's my ruleset. lan_if="em0" wan1_if="em2" wan2_if="em3" set block-policy return set skip on lo0 nat on $wan1_if from $lan_if:network to any -> ($wan1_if) block in log pass out log keep state pass in log inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq keep state pass in log quick on $lan_if Looks simple enough, right? Why won't it work? All i want is to get a ping from both of the firewalls WAN's from outside the network. Any ideas? Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default y.y.y.129 UGS 0 4433 em2 10.0.0.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 em0 10.0.0.1 00:0c:29:a9:e5:75 UHLW 1 338 em0 1177 10.0.0.2 00:0c:29:c0:74:57 UHLW 1 3291 em0 1041 10.0.0.10 00:19:db:b1:07:78 UHLW 1 4827 em0 1185 10.0.1.0/24 link#7 UC 0 0 vlan0 10.0.2.0/24 link#8 UC 0 0 vlan1 10.0.2.2 00:0c:29:e9:8c:d2 UHLW 1 251 vlan1 1190 10.0.3.0/24 link#9 UC 0 0 vlan2 10.0.3.2 00:50:56:9c:53:89 UHLW 1 420 vlan2 1152 10.0.4.0/24 link#10 UC 0 0 vlan3 10.0.5.0/24 link#11 UC 0 0 vlan4 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 y.y.y.128/25 link#3 UC 0 0 em2 x.x.x.144/28 link#4 UC 0 0 em3 x.x.x.146 00:0c:29:b5:0e:bb UHLW 1 6 lo0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 13:57:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111811065670 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ervin23@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D279F8FC25 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ervin23@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so1359177wfa.7 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=orlAZMW4GZl8fEnZ1kHe3toVGTLtuG0RPKxnGmSmMik=; b=q7RmOksSKEOsjY9Niot+kjzlYHWaJOvfPM628qezLYz1syx41uR24BNGn0sGTR+ScUfoZNeksH5N7hSf9G1kxK+gcjWdvwHeYNJ5XnDieiMDqkwsG9UOk6yKr+pIu4ytQXPzWZMhCwZyhLqYgjrn5O4012Q4vesyQjBvZ27zp28= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bw+WwmhUGpmYDNqZJHZKJw7CVR/RfP4WfiXhP9kcq0SH/F64Q3+GqNV2dkTNWuUHfDw5r6qzFNYCe8ywPIWCyQDfT4kB09gtAuSX9b0JUJnEA6TyNdyaolboo9U+jSMtuDK8o4y+pWXQyefoxP6n84nJGmf+czV5N5PpRi/sX+M= Received: by 10.142.177.7 with SMTP id z7mr1358623wfe.238.1205070646035; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.11.10 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 06:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:50:46 +0100 From: ervin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: IPFW - kernel: drop session / too many entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:57:05 -0000 I'm running FreeBSD FreeWeb.local 6.3-RELEASE-p1 with apache2 php5 mysql5 On 09/03/2008, ervin wrote: > I get this message in the /etc/security file: > > Mar 9 14:24:45 FreeWeb kernel: drop session 80.198.0.217:61236 -> > 192.168.1.99:80, too many entries > > which causes a delay when accessing the web server (one of them is > www.valentin-jensen.org) > > I have the following in my sysctl.conf: > > net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 > net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=5 > net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max=8192 > > Any ideas ? > > > -- > > mvh/best regards ervin > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 14:08:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB85F106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ervin23@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DB58FC15 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ervin23@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so1362336wfa.7 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 07:08:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=alC9xa3OsnOKaOOxrL4uxje+PTc5r4p8HxJX9zIupI8=; b=vbPZO4fkItbuDf9Nhu03ashuj9DLLFtgo6kjH/Oy4VrVkCOGyY/SnCo/f5Ao87TIRSeMiltACGKrKawMBUToGqXQLRCb7iWZKx7yqGx6f2Jz+mXxiOV3V7yPaKlS2g5Sz8QlMiZG/eitZmiLMY1WjQmR22hexfp1wCll/8mq/Ik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=stbyNBm8NjZoCN9Ojk6nEzHULwJTr0+9TSVW9Zz+o9U5TlbzZmRSIAPKTdsRWCd9O918xpxNEwVbb9bgYWZeLY/7JI0KR5sfmFGa0ZPaowDDvXSeA/6rNRD8YZzgKqwKU5zGfgCz5HLo1ZqkSYOG3lOsfEiiIrgbwYxYQRC86wU= Received: by 10.142.255.12 with SMTP id c12mr1398442wfi.26.1205070263418; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 06:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.11.10 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 06:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:44:23 +0100 From: ervin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: IPFW - kernel: drop session / too many entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:08:27 -0000 I get this message in the /etc/security file: Mar 9 14:24:45 FreeWeb kernel: drop session 80.198.0.217:61236 -> 192.168.1.99:80, too many entries which causes a delay when accessing the web server (one of them is www.valentin-jensen.org) I have the following in my sysctl.conf: net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=5 net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max=8192 Any ideas ? -- mvh/best regards ervin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 14:53:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46311065677 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx05.cern.ch [137.138.166.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710E28FC28 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX05 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg40.cern.ch ([137.138.137.186]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:41:02 +0100 Received: from cernfe13.cern.ch ([137.138.140.38]) by cernxchg40.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:41:02 +0100 Received: from lxplus216.cern.ch (137.138.4.37) by smtp.cern.ch (137.138.140.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:41:01 +0100 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:41:01 +0100 From: Luca Presotto X-X-Sender: presotto@lxplus216.cern.ch To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2008 14:41:02.0139 (UTC) FILETIME=[98D808B0:01C881F3] Subject: WLan randomly suffering from heavy package lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:53:08 -0000 Hi everyone. I'm currently running freebsd-7.0-release GENERIC on a dell Inspiron 6400 (i386). I have a problem when networking via wifi. I have an intel 3945abg integrated card and I'm using the wpi drivers. I can connect to my wlan but after one minute or so of perfect connection the network starts to be terribly slow. I have tried pinging and I discovered that I have a 60% package lost when pinging something like google or other sites, that goes up to 90% or more when I increase the package size. When pinging my router or other computers inside my network I get even worse performances. (Something like 97% package lost or 100% if increasing the package size to something like 1400) With other OSes in my pc everything is fine, other pcs connect without problem. If I connect via etherneth to the same hub where the wifi transmitter is connected everything is fine. I have tried adding to resolv.conf, automatically generated by dhclient, the addresses of the DNSs of my ISP and browsing the internet has become a liiitle better, but still very far from the normal speed. And connecting to other pcs inside my network is still a pain.. Any idea? Thank you, Luca resolve .conf: nameserver 192.168.1.1 (my router) nameserver .......(my ISP DNS) #ifconfig wpi0 wpi0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:77:23:a3:9e inet6 fe80::21b:77ff:fe23:a39e%wpi0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.1.250 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/24Mbps) status: associated ssid Maldives channel 6 (2437 Mhz 11g) bssid 00:11:95:18:83:45 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 50 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 15:11:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500BA106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C0E8FC1B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYNBh-0007gF-QA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0700 Message-ID: <15936498.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:11:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Ofloo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44bq5om5yt.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: nospam@ofloo.net References: <15921128.post@talk.nabble.com> <44bq5om5yt.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:11:47 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Ofloo writes: > >> When using 6to4 extensively the system crashes I've never had this with >> gif >> tunnels though every since I've started using 6to4 and stf interface this >> happens especially when the v6 gateway is unreachable for short time, .. >> >> I haven't seen the error yet but I do know i had this before, well it's >> not >> showing in the /var/log/all.log nor /var/log/messages, however I do >> remember >> something about non-sleeping thread or something.. >> >> If anyone needs more info let me know I'll be more then happy to provide >> a >> system to test on if required currently i have 3 exact systems which have >> this issue. > > See the kernel debugging section in the Developers' Handbook. > > You don't mention what version you're running, but you may want to > update to something recent. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > It doesn't matter, I've had it since 6.0 and it is still present in version 6.3,.. not sure about 5.3 though from the point I've started using IPv6 and SMP FreeBSD has been letting me down. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPv6-6to4-tp15921128p15936498.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 15:12:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D111065672 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7FA8FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:12:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYNCl-0007hX-KF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 08:12:51 -0700 Message-ID: <15936498.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 08:12:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Ofloo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: nospam@ofloo.net Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:12:52 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > Ofloo writes: > >> When using 6to4 extensively the system crashes I've never had this with >> gif >> tunnels though every since I've started using 6to4 and stf interface this >> happens especially when the v6 gateway is unreachable for short time, .. >> >> I haven't seen the error yet but I do know i had this before, well it's >> not >> showing in the /var/log/all.log nor /var/log/messages, however I do >> remember >> something about non-sleeping thread or something.. >> >> If anyone needs more info let me know I'll be more then happy to provide >> a >> system to test on if required currently i have 3 exact systems which have >> this issue. > > See the kernel debugging section in the Developers' Handbook. > > You don't mention what version you're running, but you may want to > update to something recent. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > It doesn't matter, I've had it since 6.0 and it is still present in version 6.3,.. not sure but I think it was already pressent in 5.3 though from the point I've started using IPv6 and/or SMP FreeBSD has been letting me down. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/IPv6-6to4-tp15921128p15936498.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 15:34:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED576106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75898FC15 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEB4782C; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:34:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49D4E6DA1C3; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:34:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:34:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <35e542ab0803090441j66464273kfdb8656d1c633114@mail.gmail.com> <47D3D6B2.9020102@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47D3D6B2.9020102@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1414690.j6CzJ7tFTK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803091034.54633.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Manolis Kiagias , Viktor Penkov Subject: Re: ext3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:34:55 -0000 --nextPart1414690.j6CzJ7tFTK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 09 March 2008 07:23:14 am Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Viktor Penkov wrote: > > Hi everybody!!!I've installed the new release of fbsd, but I can't mount > > my ext3 partitions.can somebody help me with this? > > best regards > > Have a look at > > man 5 ext2fs > > for instructions. > > You will have to mount ext3 as ext2. This is possible as long as the > ext3 filesystem is not "dirty" (i.e. the journal is clean, meaning the > volume was properly dismounted last time you used it). Mind you, IIRC, > if you write something to the disk while it is mounted as ext2, it will > probably go through a long fsck next time you reboot into Linux > (assuming you are sharing this partition between Linux and FreeBSD). This may be mentioned in the manpage, but in case it's not, sysutils/e2fspr= ogs=20 is an invaluable tool for those wishing to deal with ext[2|3]fs on FreeBSD. =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart1414690.j6CzJ7tFTK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBH1AOeJvkB8SevrssRAhSuAJwPE0Ku507bPikiXxTTBzJlFMBhDACgkSDE UNUbxKJO9l8HBwFLAAoznqY= =Bdqb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1414690.j6CzJ7tFTK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 15:41:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B63106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1C38FC17 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FDD789D; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:41:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A78C16DA1A5; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:41:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:40:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart109575625.voINgCYF9X"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803091041.03862.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: erik Wilson Subject: Re: Help with pf ruleset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:41:03 -0000 --nextPart109575625.voINgCYF9X Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 09 March 2008 08:22:07 am erik Wilson wrote: > I'm pulling my hair out here. I've been working on this for days without > any success. > > I've whittled the ruleset down to the barest possible rules and even that > doesn't work. I'm at my wits end. I would really appreciate it if someone > could show me where i'm being a complete and total moron. > > Here's the situation. I have a somewhat unique environment. It consists of > 2 WAN's, an internal LAN, and numerous VLANS (isolated clients, which need > to be accessible from the internet, but not to each other). This runs in a > VMWare esx server, but that's not really important. > > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE > > em0 =3D lan (10.0.0.x) > em2 =3D WAN1 (y.y.y.y) (dhcp) > em3 =3D WAN2 (x.x.x.x) (static /28 subnet) > > the default gateway is on nic2. nic3 will need to forward ip:port's to > various vlans. nic2 is used for all outbound lan traffic (internet). nic2 > will need to failover to nic3 eventually, and nic3 will have to failover = to > nic2 (for outbound, obviously no choice for inbound). > > So here's the problem. I can't even get nic2 or nic3 to respond to a ping > request from outside my network when pf is enabled. I know the interfaces > are set up correct, as I can ping the default gateways of both interfaces. > > Also, outbound NAT works perfectly on wan1. > > Here's my ruleset. > > lan_if=3D"em0" > wan1_if=3D"em2" > wan2_if=3D"em3" > set block-policy return > set skip on lo0 > nat on $wan1_if from $lan_if:network to any -> ($wan1_if) > block in log > pass out log keep state > pass in log inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq keep state > pass in log quick on $lan_if > > Looks simple enough, right? Why won't it work? All i want is to get a ping > from both of the firewalls WAN's from outside the network. > > Any ideas? > > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default y.y.y.129 UGS 0 4433 em2 > 10.0.0.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 em0 > 10.0.0.1 00:0c:29:a9:e5:75 UHLW 1 338 em0 1177 > 10.0.0.2 00:0c:29:c0:74:57 UHLW 1 3291 em0 1041 > 10.0.0.10 00:19:db:b1:07:78 UHLW 1 4827 em0 1185 > 10.0.1.0/24 link#7 UC 0 0 vlan0 > 10.0.2.0/24 link#8 UC 0 0 vlan1 > 10.0.2.2 00:0c:29:e9:8c:d2 UHLW 1 251 vlan1 1190 > 10.0.3.0/24 link#9 UC 0 0 vlan2 > 10.0.3.2 00:50:56:9c:53:89 UHLW 1 420 vlan2 1152 > 10.0.4.0/24 link#10 UC 0 0 vlan3 > 10.0.5.0/24 link#11 UC 0 0 vlan4 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 > y.y.y.128/25 link#3 UC 0 0 em2 > x.x.x.144/28 link#4 UC 0 0 em3 > x.x.x.146 00:0c:29:b5:0e:bb UHLW 1 6 lo0 The obfusication is making it harder for my brain to deal with than it shou= ld=20 be. At any rate, em3 isn't going to work properly without a route-to rule = to=20 get it to answer back to pings out the proper gateway. I'm not entirely su= re=20 why you can't ping the ip on em2, could you provide the output of tcpdump -= i=20 em2 while you ping it? Also, what did you do with em1? :) =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart109575625.voINgCYF9X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBH1AUPJvkB8SevrssRAqkoAJ9th07bo7gPl1Co3d27iXSU2mAMJgCeN7yt vYyNQ/LVnIZwLvJgZcC8LN0= =IMgX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart109575625.voINgCYF9X-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 16:31:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951FD1065671 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linman800@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFEA8FC20 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linman800@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so991544rvb.43 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:31:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=tTeuiWo5w+b8nBV11ja06Wg+8+VKNgPx4Mv2qBvBHwc=; b=l5gVtyp/RokYFQ/eOBBFmYZKyYvFNgU7yO019m6xOVBkl0dwQZLMy855NeomNhRF4epPeLc6oIYCOT3JVfhd6Z1BBFQ/TBaLr5L7nETysMleJzitdlyOk+/797tAW8BDCEBvBaW48J/Yn23amHy9DwrMjYJBs7Ne+6Ydb5tXRkg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=C+COh6e3LauzVdnsV+z+Buhml45Cn0pL929rm0L0Fv40PcnHH03lJqBny+gcVW9IeyIMkho09+4B0XecjB8tvuuOj2JDw0vtnz+SFr4sXVcISPgO7SSXMRqLFRgtlnhoFfkDMyIWIVlZfYFjaEgGCrJyxB5xaOM3Bg1OU9T0Uhw= Received: by 10.141.22.1 with SMTP id z1mr2499339rvi.67.1205080292910; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.203.16 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <73505da00803090931w4bd01fc3r408b17d9c2549fbb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:31:33 +0200 From: "Anatoli Marinov" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ifconfig ral0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:31:34 -0000 How I can turn on fast frame and turbo modes for ralink wireless card: ral0@pci0:2:11:0: class=0x028000 card=0x25611814 chip=0x03011814 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Ralink Technology, Corp' device = 'RT2561/RT61 802.11g PCI' class = network The card supports these features under windows but here (freebsd 7.0 stable) I could not switch the on. ifconfig -v ral0 ral0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 00:0e:2e:ec:e1:3d inet 172.16.4.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.4.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid freebsdap channel 1 (2412 Mhz 11g) bssid 00:0e:2e:ec:e1:3d authmode WPA privacy MIXED deftxkey 3 TKIP 2:128-bit TKIP 3:128-bit powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 txpower 50 txpowmax 50.0 rtsthreshold 2346 fragthreshold 2346 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 -bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi11a 7 roam:rate11a 12 roam:rssi11b 7 roam:rate11b 1 roam:rssi11g 7 roam:rate11g 5 -pureg protmode CTS -ht -htcompat -ampdu ampdulimit 8k ampdudensity - -amsdu -shortgi htprotmode RTSCTS -puren -wme -burst -ff -dturbo -hidessid apbridge dtimperiod 1 doth inact bintval 100 I tried to execute ifconfig ral0 ff ifconfig ral0 dturbo ifconfig ral0 burst But all lines filed.. Maybe the BSD driver does not support them. What do you think? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 16:46:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874A91065686 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ervin23@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51EEB8FC28 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ervin23@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so1413409wfa.7 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=WUn9eGh9nsXGFRC8ajdsPCEri+v3lxqrjgOErZP0aYA=; b=OIeTzWQONvqs7vm/L5Gm7Yo8uAfMhQnCqURtLUXODdsPvVnQboJv4EXMRdqp4ZcI1R6OWfSF9e+uOaRQ+Xp+fT7ssSP1vDIEFfi7qh0NQOvY/Os3p/xYXpUQBO3geecHlst4Zu/kHdMakT78bORgeu0Kv/2eYjJl0VnToMzNI8A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BGI4jfRhiG48NGpD9zxgcutgUb3csKfdGplD1OLRVbGFQhr5+LyqTBCHKwecxuY0LkPotyJFo69zRmrv5pADkgzNeYWWRZ1gcag1m8SMoxdP1dE6XFBCEtty5UWbqMpOJcMIV+MsDpth7ZO9VSMJdr9Ms+ctwqB8tYIVDbDI1Og= Received: by 10.142.188.4 with SMTP id l4mr1391804wff.183.1205081176927; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.11.10 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:46:16 +0100 From: ervin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Subject: Re: IPFW - kernel: drop session / too many entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:46:50 -0000 solved change the "limit src-addr x" to a reasonable higher value (for me a 2 to 4 modification made the difference) On 09/03/2008, ervin wrote: > I'm running > > FreeBSD FreeWeb.local 6.3-RELEASE-p1 with apache2 php5 mysql5 > > > > On 09/03/2008, ervin wrote: > > I get this message in the /etc/security file: > > > > Mar 9 14:24:45 FreeWeb kernel: drop session 80.198.0.217:61236 -> > > 192.168.1.99:80, too many entries > > > > which causes a delay when accessing the web server (one of them is > > www.valentin-jensen.org) > > > > I have the following in my sysctl.conf: > > > > net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1 > > net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=5 > > net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max=8192 > > > > Any ideas ? > > > > > > -- > > > > mvh/best regards ervin > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 17:28:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53271065671 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DF98FC22 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so458728anc.13 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:28:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=EIFAcaYPdo14DjqjKxLM7JswiCidIrpQqQiDywbBAps=; b=P2keCG5Zd5bDMFc5GfPIrZkM3Kh9OfcSYaeg/liH4ScQAXS691dXSQq2c8uJZ7kKz57XitrZA99/sbO46y5xl2qG8xpLYM1z+YPtjbYWJYWey0cpHonE5nBb4hPU2r1Lc+MtyEc2ltoXM9W/IlVMg+Nea50DlIxiUa+EE5LkEr0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XBG70/l0KlYqpjVBhi6fwSKEs74+k/2gpSgQyK/p5Gn0370RTFdFBFhXi65CEk7zPx20zVi9sArZNZWGLXnOcHSAw3Jvw/Ysz0L5GmhcJ2MOI7wv6RfPxvK/WTslfofMtgWnCqtoascKektuRVtrvxQVote7ZIIiq7DHTITdeco= Received: by 10.100.165.13 with SMTP id n13mr9079752ane.116.1205083683938; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.31.20 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 10:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6293ba970803091028v51449aeax32cbd14617cc4967@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:28:03 -0400 From: Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: cdrecord, CD-R error messages with 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:28:05 -0000 When trying to burn an ISO with cdrecord: cdrecord -v -sao fs=32m dev=1,0,0 speed=24 7.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso I'm seeing these syslog messages: Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - MODE_SELECT_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x26 ascq=0x00 sks=0x00 0x00 0x0c Mar 9 12:40:06 server last message repeated 2 times Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - MODE_SELECT_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x26 ascq=0x00 sks=0x00 0x00 0x0a Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BUFFER ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x20 ascq=0x00 Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BUFFER ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x20 ascq=0x00 Mar 9 12:40:16 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_TOC ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x40 0x00 0x02 Mar 9 12:43:32 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - MODE_SELECT_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x26 ascq=0x00 sks=0x00 0x00 0x07 The two CD-R's I've recorded verify with an md5 okay. Any ideas about these error messages? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 18:14:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555B4106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0533E8FC14 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:14:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JYQ2b-0000MR-GE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:14:33 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:14:33 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:14:33 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:14:24 +0100 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <7tc6t35of1jp07s0b72paqin7bbi898q3k@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Sender: news Subject: Re: [7.0] Stuck at "md0: Preloaded image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:14:36 -0000 On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:47:54 +0100, Gilles wrote: >I can successfully run and install FreeBSD 6.2 on the same >host/hard-disk. Any idea what could cause this? I only get one line further with a 20GB Seagate ST320413A, where FreeBSD gets stuck at the line that says "ad0: 19092MB Seagate etc.". Could it be linked to ACPI and all those things? I booted as usual, using the default boot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 18:20:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C6C1065671 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4CC8FC1E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29IK1w2001615; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:20:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m29IJrVp001606; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:19:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:19:53 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Walker In-Reply-To: <6293ba970803091028v51449aeax32cbd14617cc4967@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080309191627.J1605@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <6293ba970803091028v51449aeax32cbd14617cc4967@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrecord, CD-R error messages with 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:20:38 -0000 it's good idea to remove atapicd from kernel while using atapicam - don't keep both. personally - i use only atapicam. > When trying to burn an ISO with cdrecord: > > cdrecord -v -sao fs=32m dev=1,0,0 speed=24 7.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > > I'm seeing these syslog messages: > > Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - > MODE_SELECT_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x26 ascq=0x00 sks=0x00 0x00 0x0c > Mar 9 12:40:06 server last message repeated 2 times > Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - > MODE_SELECT_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x26 ascq=0x00 sks=0x00 0x00 0x0a > Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BUFFER > ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x20 ascq=0x00 > Mar 9 12:40:06 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_BUFFER > ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x20 ascq=0x00 > Mar 9 12:40:16 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - READ_TOC > ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x40 0x00 0x02 > Mar 9 12:43:32 server kernel: acd0: FAILURE - > MODE_SELECT_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x26 ascq=0x00 sks=0x00 0x00 0x07 > > The two CD-R's I've recorded verify with an md5 okay. Any ideas about > these error messages? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 18:35:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9968A1065672 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjd.wong@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5658FC22 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cjd.wong@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m63so1335803hsc.11 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:35:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=l3AxEDdr4JNgSchM1F/CaHK5dOxgk5yCs1IUTUxdKtc=; b=WiSA4ich+NuqXdy+QjuoiMQsXbBdpZyHJa8wZZ7MJEj2cK9W+wDjwfeGl9Rq1hbBQE1xVQ4R6W2cWb+j2pcp3KnncTXkeXM9lwIzw7cenvn/pWeU9+yGgVR5BDriVGx0Upe6mHEL0WgcloMKMVKcHzNn279FYj52zjOAVWwVIPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=KTAOgYedJP5nbexhnKLe5J66GpMus/4zao0qzz2H49a1ABVqRU28J01d4d2owpQw8TcY5Tx8iOqgn1PCrEWZQQOzaEuYTA8A1qR6Od53ZzwxpsfXIXH5hUMGbONy5qu32rJGUxpIi6AJYl1e1kl0N/CxPr46Ff878xSU6Fo7mjc= Received: by 10.140.82.38 with SMTP id f38mr2566657rvb.30.1205086023751; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.164.3 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5a054730803091107u79ae4fa3m5ef4dd7000e196c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:07:03 +0100 From: "Christian J. Wong Cruz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: freebsd iso dvd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:35:13 -0000 Hello, I'm Christian Wong and I'm new in this list, I've bought a computer with baseboard Intel DP35DP and Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6750 and I don'= t have internet connection, can someone tell me where can I download the best iso dvd for my pc? Thanks --=20 Christian J. Wong Cruz Estudiante de Ciencias de la Computaci=F3n Universidad Nacional de San Agust=EDn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 18:51:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B5A106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214F18FC19 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JYQcj-0004BC-2X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:51:53 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:51:53 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:51:53 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:51:43 +0100 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <47D3BB0E.7000507@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Sender: news Subject: Re: [6.2] Fails downloading packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:51:57 -0000 On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:25:18 +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote: >They were presumably removed for space reasons (6.3 is the latest >release). You can use ftp-archive or switch to the latest packages >(packages-6-stable). OK, thanks for the tip. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 18:59:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49DE106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290468FC1B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-287704.home.otenet.gr [85.73.171.118]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m29IxhM6009259; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <47D433AA.5050106@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:59:54 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Christian J. Wong Cruz" References: <5a054730803091107u79ae4fa3m5ef4dd7000e196c4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5a054730803091107u79ae4fa3m5ef4dd7000e196c4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd iso dvd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:59:45 -0000 Christian J. Wong Cruz wrote: > Hello, I'm Christian Wong and I'm new in this list, I've bought a computer > with baseboard Intel DP35DP and Intel Core 2 Duo Processor E6750 and I don't > have internet connection, can someone tell me where can I download the best > iso dvd for my pc? > > Thanks > > Ready made DVD ISO for 7.0-RELEASE here: http://www.tuxdistro.com/torrents-details.php?id=921 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 19:20:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B999106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD8B8FC1C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from sleipner.local (unknown [192.168.0.62]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3921C0847; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:20:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D4388A.2090604@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:20:42 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: erik Wilson References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with pf ruleset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:20:45 -0000 erik Wilson wrote: > I'm pulling my hair out here. I've been working on this for days without > any success. > > I've whittled the ruleset down to the barest possible rules and even that > doesn't work. I'm at my wits end. I would really appreciate it if someone > could show me where i'm being a complete and total moron. > > Here's the situation. I have a somewhat unique environment. It consists of > 2 WAN's, an internal LAN, and numerous VLANS (isolated clients, which need > to be accessible from the internet, but not to each other). This runs in a > VMWare esx server, but that's not really important. > > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE > > em0 = lan (10.0.0.x) > em2 = WAN1 (y.y.y.y) (dhcp) > em3 = WAN2 (x.x.x.x) (static /28 subnet) > > the default gateway is on nic2. nic3 will need to forward ip:port's to > various vlans. nic2 is used for all outbound lan traffic (internet). nic2 > will need to failover to nic3 eventually, and nic3 will have to failover to > nic2 (for outbound, obviously no choice for inbound). > > So here's the problem. I can't even get nic2 or nic3 to respond to a ping > request from outside my network when pf is enabled. I know the interfaces > are set up correct, as I can ping the default gateways of both interfaces. > > Also, outbound NAT works perfectly on wan1. > > Here's my ruleset. > > lan_if="em0" > wan1_if="em2" > wan2_if="em3" > set block-policy return > set skip on lo0 > nat on $wan1_if from $lan_if:network to any -> ($wan1_if) > block in log > pass out log keep state > pass in log inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq keep state > pass in log quick on $lan_if > > Looks simple enough, right? Why won't it work? All i want is to get a ping > from both of the firewalls WAN's from outside the network. > > Any ideas? How about the log? I know you have cut away a lot of rules, but maybe that just makes things more confusing. Try to nest your rules in the following order: direction - interface - protocol - src net - dst net - port/type You should need no "out" rules if you have "in" rules with keep state. At each branch level make a catchup rule at the end with default action and "quick" key word to make sure packets don't spill over and get matched by other rules. Hopefully this will help you pin down where things go wrong. Cheers, Erik -- Erik Nrgaard Ph: +34.666334818 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 19:33:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C370A106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:33:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik.mlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481B08FC1C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:33:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik.mlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1032029rvb.43 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:33:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=iL0ThUq0tqL6MDqSdr277b5eZKd+/Sw1Cb/becxHEvM=; b=CELgZUJgKX8YO8j+b/TS0XOBU3wKFLDZkSK4ad1Mk9KudtZW7I4Fr3vzGtAGOChj7pIcagKwYDrIVyRrSiNONd5+iF7CaJ6SjFAVBzhFZ55pD8iEN+Cfmsut6LT+EcZlrQdKeN+2f7owHKCmQ52K0oABuVYnsUJLat2ng4XYzA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=suNMbLdk0lx1nWHGfl2JMeiAGSik/kiKZetVy/nLDDyx+r+u5Q5JyMJwz9YTpYrMstaN+pWJlgLv8gO5CruWdSAhivysG0+/wL/ap7Y3yXFbkG4q9S7HXLG/vwYiX9RWgQCFxeCqQjLnb4PiedybCphAVE56MaLhEMFAfsRBN0A= Received: by 10.141.33.21 with SMTP id l21mr2550140rvj.251.1205091183777; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.141.10 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:33:03 -0400 From: "Erik Wilson" To: "Erik Norgaard" In-Reply-To: <47D4388A.2090604@locolomo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47D4388A.2090604@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with pf ruleset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:33:05 -0000 On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote: > erik Wilson wrote: > > I'm pulling my hair out here. I've been working on this for days without > > any success. > > > > I've whittled the ruleset down to the barest possible rules and even > that > > doesn't work. I'm at my wits end. I would really appreciate it if > someone > > could show me where i'm being a complete and total moron. > > > > Here's the situation. I have a somewhat unique environment. It consists > of > > 2 WAN's, an internal LAN, and numerous VLANS (isolated clients, which > need > > to be accessible from the internet, but not to each other). This runs in > a > > VMWare esx server, but that's not really important. > > > > FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE > > > > em0 = lan (10.0.0.x) > > em2 = WAN1 (y.y.y.y) (dhcp) > > em3 = WAN2 (x.x.x.x) (static /28 subnet) > > > > the default gateway is on nic2. nic3 will need to forward ip:port's to > > various vlans. nic2 is used for all outbound lan traffic (internet). > nic2 > > will need to failover to nic3 eventually, and nic3 will have to failover > to > > nic2 (for outbound, obviously no choice for inbound). > > > > So here's the problem. I can't even get nic2 or nic3 to respond to a > ping > > request from outside my network when pf is enabled. I know the > interfaces > > are set up correct, as I can ping the default gateways of both > interfaces. > > > > Also, outbound NAT works perfectly on wan1. > > > > Here's my ruleset. > > > > lan_if="em0" > > wan1_if="em2" > > wan2_if="em3" > > set block-policy return > > set skip on lo0 > > nat on $wan1_if from $lan_if:network to any -> ($wan1_if) > > block in log > > pass out log keep state > > pass in log inet proto icmp all icmp-type echoreq keep state > > pass in log quick on $lan_if > > > > Looks simple enough, right? Why won't it work? All i want is to get a > ping > > from both of the firewalls WAN's from outside the network. > > > > Any ideas? > > How about the log? I'll post some log info as soon as I can bring down the network again to do some testing. > I know you have cut away a lot of rules, but maybe that just makes > things more confusing. Try to nest your rules in the following order: > > direction - interface - protocol - src net - dst net - port/type > > You should need no "out" rules if you have "in" rules with keep state. > At each branch level make a catchup rule at the end with default action > and "quick" key word to make sure packets don't spill over and get > matched by other rules. Good advice, thanks. I'm afraid i've tried so many different options and variations to get this to work that it's not as pretty as it should be. I got some of these rules from various examples posted on the web, and tweaked them into unrecognizability ;) Do you think that Josh is right about needing a route-to rule for the second WAN interface? Since you're handing out best practices ;) Is it better to use a nat pass or rdr pass rule than seperate nat/rdr and pass statements? Why? I think my biggest frustration is not finding a single place that is detailed enough about things. I've rad the book of pf, the man pages, the handbooks, etc.. they all give pieces of the puzzle. Maybe once i master this i'll work on a "pf bible" ;) > Hopefully this will help you pin down where things go wrong. > > Cheers, Erik > Cheers yourself Erik ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 20:04:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A161065671 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamt@sonic.net) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CFF8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamt@sonic.net) Received: from williamt.noc.sonic.net (williamt.noc.sonic.net [64.142.18.38]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m29JdG6T009858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:39:16 -0700 Received: from williamt.noc.sonic.net (testing.localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by williamt.noc.sonic.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29JdG6L000343 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:39:16 -0700 Received: (from wt@localhost) by williamt.noc.sonic.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m29JdGbB000341 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:39:16 -0700 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:39:16 -0700 From: William Taylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080309193916.GB32697@williamt.noc.sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 w/ 3ware 9650SE-24M8 no JBOD disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:04:42 -0000 I just installed FreeBSD 7.0 w/ a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 controller. I set the controller to export JBOD disks but they don't show up in FreeBSD for some reason. I have verified that they do show up in CentOS so I don't think the controller is setup wrong. If I create an array it will show up in FreeBSD as da0. I have tried disabling the onboard sata controller as well to see if that made a difference. Also I couldn't find anything else in the kernel that might pertain to this. BTW I had to use the onboard sata controller for the install because the disks were not showing up. uname -a: FreeBSD localhost 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 9 06:00:53 UTC 2008 root@localhost:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LDS amd64 Potentialy relevent dmesg output: 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.70.05.001 twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xd8000000-0xd9ffffff,0xda300000-0xda300fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci9 twa0: [ITHREAD] twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0053): Battery capacity test is overdue: twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9650SE-24M8, 24 ports, Firmware FE9X 3.08.00.016, BIOS BE9X 3.08.00.004 da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 5721984MB (11718623232 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 729450C) FreeBSD has no problems detecting the disk w/ the onboard sata controller: ad4: 953869MB at ata2-master SATA300 ad6: 953869MB at ata3-master SATA300 ad8: 953869MB at ata4-master SATA300 ad10: 953869MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 953869MB at ata6-master SATA300 ad14: 953869MB at ata7-master SATA300 Thanks, William From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 20:08:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34297106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamt@sonic.net) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C568FC19 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamt@sonic.net) Received: from williamt.noc.sonic.net (williamt.noc.sonic.net [64.142.18.38]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m29Jb5kv009234 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:37:06 -0700 Received: from williamt.noc.sonic.net (testing.localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by williamt.noc.sonic.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29Jb50O000328 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:37:05 -0700 Received: (from wt@localhost) by williamt.noc.sonic.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m29Jb5WK000326 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:37:05 -0700 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:37:05 -0700 From: William Taylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080309193705.GA32697@williamt.noc.sonic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Subject: FreeBSD 7.0 w/ 9650SE-24M8 no JBOD disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:08:04 -0000 I just installed FreeBSD 7.0 w/ a 3ware 9650SE-24M8 controller. I set the controller to export JBOD disks but they don't show up in FreeBSD for some reason. I have verified that they do show up in CentOS so I don't think the controller is setup wrong. If I create an array it will show up in FreeBSD as da0. I have tried disabling the onboard sata controller as well to see if that made a difference. Also I couldn't find anything else in the kernel that might pertain to this. BTW I had to use the onboard sata controller for the install because the disks were not showing up. uname -a: FreeBSD localhost 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun Mar 9 06:00:53 UTC 2008 root@localhost:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LDS amd64 Potentialy relevent dmesg output: 3ware device driver for 9000 series storage controllers, version: 3.70.05.001 twa0: <3ware 9000 series Storage Controller> port 0x3000-0x30ff mem 0xd8000000-0xd9ffffff,0xda300000-0xda300fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci9 twa0: [ITHREAD] twa0: INFO: (0x04: 0x0053): Battery capacity test is overdue: twa0: INFO: (0x15: 0x1300): Controller details:: Model 9650SE-24M8, 24 ports, Firmware FE9X 3.08.00.016, BIOS BE9X 3.08.00.004 da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device da0: 100.000MB/s transfers da0: 5721984MB (11718623232 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 729450C) FreeBSD has no problems detecting the disk w/ the onboard sata controller: ad4: 953869MB at ata2-master SATA300 ad6: 953869MB at ata3-master SATA300 ad8: 953869MB at ata4-master SATA300 ad10: 953869MB at ata5-master SATA300 ad12: 953869MB at ata6-master SATA300 ad14: 953869MB at ata7-master SATA300 Thanks, William From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 20:15:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13347106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@jcornwall.me.uk) Received: from vps1.jcornwall.me.uk (vps1.jcornwall.me.uk [193.227.111.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75668FC16 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@jcornwall.me.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (evilrealms.demon.co.uk [62.49.12.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vps1.jcornwall.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1171D5200EA for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:56:28 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47D440EC.2080507@jcornwall.me.uk> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:56:28 +0000 From: "Jay L. T. Cornwall" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Read-only, diskless boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:15:47 -0000 Hi, I am trying to install FreeBSD onto a CompactFlash card for an ALIX system. This guide precisely documents my goals: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/solid-state/ro-fs.html Unfortunately, it has not been updated for FreeBSD 7. Crucial files such as /etc/rc.diskless2 have been replaced by a new mechanism in /etc/rc.initdiskless. The little documentation I have scraped from the web is too focused on PXE boots with NFS-mounted directories for me to figure the new system out. All I need is: * / partition to work in read-only mode. * Volatile directories such as /root, /var and /tmp to be populated into a memory filesystem on boot. The /conf system seems to be related to this, however /etc/rc.initdiskless specifically says that it is not the correct mechanism to use for /var. (Quite what is, I've no idea.) Can someone give me a leg up? -- Jay L. T. Cornwall http://www.jcornwall.me.uk/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 20:30:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2F7106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from mail.locolomo.org (97.pool85-48-194.static.orange.es [85.48.194.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FE38FC18 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from sleipner.local (unknown [192.168.0.62]) by mail.locolomo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AF11C0847; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:30:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D448DE.2090907@locolomo.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:30:22 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Wilson References: <47D4388A.2090604@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with pf ruleset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:30:24 -0000 Erik Wilson wrote: > I know you have cut away a lot of rules, but maybe that just makes > things more confusing. Try to nest your rules in the following order: > > direction - interface - protocol - src net - dst net - port/type > > You should need no "out" rules if you have "in" rules with keep state. > At each branch level make a catchup rule at the end with default action > and "quick" key word to make sure packets don't spill over and get > matched by other rules. > > > Good advice, thanks. I'm afraid i've tried so many different options > and variations to get this to work that it's not as pretty as it should > be. I got some of these rules from various examples posted on the web, > and tweaked them into unrecognizability ;) Do you think that Josh is > right about needing a route-to rule for the second WAN interface? It is absolutely possible that the problem is that the ping or response get sent the wrong way. Use snort to see what goes on. I did not analyze your setup to the point that I can tell you that. > Since you're handing out best practices ;) Is it better to use a nat > pass or rdr pass rule than seperate nat/rdr and pass statements? Why? I prefer to separate things. I know the less lines you have, the less lines can contain an error. But on the other hand, the less lines you have the more obscure and difficult to debug they become. It is very common that people believe they have errors in their filter rules when in fact it's nat rules that are wrong. When you have both rdr, nat and binat be careful to understand which order they take effect. They are first match. But since rdr is done on the way IN while nat is done on the way OUT, an rdr rule can take effect before the intended nat rule despite it being after the nat rule. So, to avoid such confusion, write first your rdr, then nat. Also, use the log statement in your nat rules while debugging. Cheers, Erik -- Erik Nrgaard Ph: +34.666334818 http://www.locolomo.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:01:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EE1106567C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (mail.smart-serv.net [208.68.18.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5C48FC2E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from localhost (ldap.smart-serv.net [208.68.18.197]) by mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 622292E5C60 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:01:05 -0600 (MDT) Received: from sleet.dwncrk.bc.ssnet.ca (S0106000d87073d15.nb.shawcable.net [70.74.68.215]) by mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E326F2E5C5E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:01:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <47D45E21.5010709@smart-serv.net> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:01:05 -0700 From: Jeremy Johnston User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080308) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: K8N-VM CSM not seeing over 2240MB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:01:06 -0000 I have been trying to trouble shoot a problem where my 32bit kernel will not see past 2240MB of RAM where as the BIOS reports it as 3GB. Windows on the same machine sees all 3GB. My dmesg can be found at http://www.smart-serv.net/~jeremy/dmesg.txt Any suggestions on what could be the cause of this would be greatly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:17:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97755106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@bluebottle.com) Received: from mi1.bluebottle.com (mi1.bluebottle.com [206.188.25.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AEC8FC20 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xyin@bluebottle.com) Received: from fe1.bluebottle.com (internal.bluebottle.com [206.188.24.43]) by mi1.bluebottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m29L1FjU029757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:01:15 -0700 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=bluebottle.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version: content-type:x-trusted-delivery; b=P2UTl5QfinS9PQdFlxKR78p+lKyWmntWcIARZTHK9qsrVUbSleWFHme9hgOuf0JnS p3trFkbZH+DYiJquwGRdohNVcuBS/da5OcnDzZXasMEJMC/Dh0VF0UuvFCtaoVa Received: from dell (pool-71-166-37-231.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [71.166.37.231]) (authenticated bits=0) by fe1.bluebottle.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m29L19c6012952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:01:15 -0700 Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:01:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Xihong Yin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Trusted-Delivery: Subject: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:17:11 -0000 Hi, My FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time. How should I fix it? 'zdump -v /etc/localtime | grep 2008' output: /etc/localtime Sun Mar 9 06:59:59 2008 UTC = Sun Mar 9 01:59:59 2008 EST isdst=0 gmtoff=-18000 /etc/localtime Sun Mar 9 07:00:00 2008 UTC = Sun Mar 9 03:00:00 2008 EDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-14400 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 2 05:59:59 2008 UTC = Sun Nov 2 01:59:59 2008 EDT isdst=1 gmtoff=-14400 /etc/localtime Sun Nov 2 06:00:00 2008 UTC = Sun Nov 2 01:00:00 2008 EST isdst=0 gmtoff=-18000 Xihong ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get a free email account with anti spam protection. http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:26:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BC8106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi029.prodigy.net (nlpi029.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256858FC1B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:26:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi029.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29MQYPl029013 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:26:35 -0500 Message-ID: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:26:35 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:26:39 -0000 I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache module. It runs fine without the module directives that are automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is compiled and installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. Mar 9 15:21:03 ns2 kernel: pid 67406 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) The httpd-error.log does not seem to indicate a problem. Anyone else experiencing this? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:32:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A122F1065671 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik.mlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E368FC1B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erik.mlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1074434rvb.43 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=wqjyQ6XfjgZvAUcGnkK0de9+gOLAGi14n9v7FfyvoaE=; b=nZOTBzfnS9onSQTKF1za2lKniB80Lk8EzPgp/oiKh+JHR9gj2TUC22V8jGrSc4Svvg6GeMBZsdbwMxWNmA3KSQGbfmGhbedvxZCsSYCWy8iMm0kWTOFvW2tsJMZv5OYIiXZrsHNxI46CMLuyeQ1av3KhdNJd/OJBtmmP5oFVe5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=KcHx+OVdwsb7s2PUUlBzawlavcMsbVnt1Skm3FNUXF92ulMXwF3xh//iXMlGosAzgdqKwW3SKTyjEd2BLd45FqC9PCwyuWMEuYs7cN7WpA9BPfv4eEb8M3IlX9U39y2ch0mEnUGiMuAdw31fBnOPjYkhlk6O8oS1AeWCfp5HMNM= Received: by 10.141.34.12 with SMTP id m12mr2679290rvj.26.1205101920475; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.141.10 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:32:00 -0400 From: "Erik Wilson" To: "Chris Maness" In-Reply-To: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:32:01 -0000 On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache > module. It runs fine without the module directives that are > automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is compiled and > installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. > Have you upgraded to the latest version of apache to go with the latest version of php5? Perhaps you have an older version that isn't binary compatible with the latest compiled php. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:38:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938861065676 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi043.prodigy.net (nlpi043.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7458FC1E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi043.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29McLD1026752; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:38:22 -0500 Message-ID: <47D466DD.8090805@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:38:21 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Wilson References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:38:28 -0000 Erik Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Chris Maness > wrote: > > I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache > module. It runs fine without the module directives that are > automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is > compiled and > installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. > > > Have you upgraded to the latest version of apache to go with the > latest version of php5? Perhaps you have an older version that isn't > binary compatible with the latest compiled php. > I just synced my port tree several days ago and rebuilt both. I will try it again. Chris Maness From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:46:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527401065670 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4EE8FC18 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB841CCAC; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:46:44 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:46:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Chris Maness , Erik Wilson Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:46:46 -0000 On Sunday 09 March 2008 23:32:00 Erik Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Chris Maness wrote: > > I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache > > module. It runs fine without the module directives that are > > automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is compiled and > > installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. > > Have you upgraded to the latest version of apache to go with the latest > version of php5? Perhaps you have an older version that isn't binary > compatible with the latest compiled php. Bogus. Php works with any apache version it supports. Chris: juggle order of /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, see archive for discussion as to why this can't be handled normally. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 22:51:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25D0106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi015.prodigy.net (nlpi015.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7258FC1E for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:51:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi015.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29MouQV030328; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:50:56 -0500 Message-ID: <47D469D0.7080903@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:50:56 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:51:01 -0000 Mel wrote: > On Sunday 09 March 2008 23:32:00 Erik Wilson wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Chris Maness wrote: >> >>> I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache >>> module. It runs fine without the module directives that are >>> automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is compiled and >>> installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. >>> >> Have you upgraded to the latest version of apache to go with the latest >> version of php5? Perhaps you have an older version that isn't binary >> compatible with the latest compiled php. >> > > Bogus. Php works with any apache version it supports. > > Chris: juggle order of /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, see archive for > discussion as to why this can't be handled normally. > > OK, after my php finishes building ;o) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 23:01:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05547106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@jcornwall.me.uk) Received: from vps1.jcornwall.me.uk (vps1.jcornwall.me.uk [193.227.111.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70478FC18 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@jcornwall.me.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (evilrealms.demon.co.uk [62.49.12.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vps1.jcornwall.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F025200EA for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:01:55 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47D46C63.6060203@jcornwall.me.uk> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:01:55 +0000 From: "Jay L. T. Cornwall" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D440EC.2080507@jcornwall.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <47D440EC.2080507@jcornwall.me.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Read-only, diskless boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:01:57 -0000 Jay L. T. Cornwall wrote: > All I need is: > * / partition to work in read-only mode. > * Volatile directories such as /root, /var and /tmp to be populated > into a memory filesystem on boot. OK, this turned out to be easier after I spent some time reading through the /etc/rc.initdiskless script. All that was needed was to create: /conf/base/root /conf/base/tmp /conf/base/var And fill them with the files to be populated in a memory filesystem on reboot. A md_size file inside each dir tweaks the size of the memory disks according to the script. Then touch /etc/diskless and the magic happens! -- Jay L. T. Cornwall http://www.jcornwall.me.uk/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 23:10:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C338106566C for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@mkdev.eu) Received: from natrium.sulf.at (natrium.sulf.at [88.198.116.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FFA8FC12 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@mkdev.eu) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (unknown [77.210.21.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by natrium.sulf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398FC114B4 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47D46A4B.6050409@mkdev.eu> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:52:59 +0100 From: Markus Klaschka Organization: mkdev.eu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20080208 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010408080203000400010607" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: tar( bzip2 parts of manpage ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:10:28 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010408080203000400010607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I never used built-in bzip functionality of tar, but I like bzip2 more than gzip, so I just searched and found following: -j (c mode only) Compress the resulting archive with bzip2(1). In extract or list modes, this option is ignored. Note that, unlike other tar implementations, this implementation recognizes bzip2 compression automatically when reading archives. and -y (c mode only) Compress the resulting archive with bzip2(1). In extract or list modes, this option is ignored. Note that, unlike other tar implementations, this implementation recognizes bzip2 compression automatically when reading archives. what's going on there? I tested the -j option, works good. I created a file.tar.bz2 and like the manpage describes, tar -cvf is enough to unpack the tarball, Is that a FreeBSD feature, how is it on other platforms? Is bzip2 used, or is that build in as a tar? Cheers - Markus Klaschka MKDev - Markus Klaschka Development http://www.mkdev.eu Spain: 0034 - 63 747 23 07 UK: 0044 - 750 910 2718 Mail: mk@mkdev.eu Skype: mark-use IRC: mark-use @ irc.freenode.net : #freebsd, ##security, #freebsd-src, #bsdforen.de, #bsdgroup.de --------------010408080203000400010607-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 23:20:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22B9106566B for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl (smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl [213.51.146.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9768FC24 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danny@ricin.com) Received: from [213.51.146.190] (port=33420 helo=smtp1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl) by smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYUok-0005B7-Lt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:20:34 +0100 Received: from cp1228410-a.dbsch1.nb.home.nl ([84.27.217.164]:62272 helo=desktop.homenet) by smtp1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYUoj-0006UT-QN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:20:34 +0100 Received: by desktop.homenet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:19:33 +0100 From: "Danny Pansters" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:19:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D46A4B.6050409@mkdev.eu> In-Reply-To: <47D46A4B.6050409@mkdev.eu> X-Face: (Zs+'ncTcchkOX|~t6{?Iii=O!G#WEK!+OD0|-F=i%1pvP5V_Sz4PaJC8o)=?utf-8?q?MiSnH/JMJFy=0A=09oBN-My?=, v":S7, (=?utf-8?q?mmkPm=27U=7BMgT+eM=2EBd=5Cp/P!dr=5DhOTXqpse21O!=25Ct=60SE=2EOodq?= =?utf-8?q?=5Dry=5E=23kU=5E=0A=09-?=GT.[8D}i$6P>=" =?utf-8?q?=23=0A=09*J+4d=7E?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803100019.33200.danny@ricin.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: Re: tar( bzip2 parts of manpage ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:20:36 -0000 On Sunday 09 March 2008 23:52:59 Markus Klaschka wrote: > Hi, > I never used built-in bzip functionality of tar, but I like bzip2 more > than gzip, so I just searched and found following: > -j (c mode only) Compress the resulting archive with bzip2(1). > In extract or list modes, this option is ignored. Note that, unlike > other tar implementations, this implementation recognizes > bzip2 compression automatically when reading archives. > and > -y (c mode only) Compress the resulting archive with bzip2(1). > In extract or list modes, this option is ignored. Note that, unlike > other tar implementations, this implementation recognizes > bzip2 compression automatically when reading archives. > > what's going on there? > > I tested the -j option, works good. I created a file.tar.bz2 and like > the manpage describes, tar -cvf is enough to unpack the tarball, you mean tar xvf > Is that a FreeBSD feature, how is it on other platforms? > Is bzip2 used, or is that build in as a tar? bsdtar != gtar In bsdtar -j (-y) indeed uses bzip2 to compress rather than gzip and upon unpacking it handles both tgz and tbz transparantly that's why you don't need to specify -j there (different from gtar IIRC). I think -j and -y are mainly there to be compatible with gtar but I'm not sure. Note that both bsdtar and bzip2 are in base and have been for a while so it seems like a logical feature for bsdtar. Knowing whether its a gzip or bzip2 compressed is easy to see from magic numbers. Cheers, Dan > > Cheers > > - > Markus Klaschka > MKDev - Markus Klaschka Development > http://www.mkdev.eu > > Spain: 0034 - 63 747 23 07 > UK: > 0044 - 750 910 2718 > Mail: mk@mkdev.eu > Skype: mark-use > IRC: mark-use @ irc.freenode.net : #freebsd, ##security, #freebsd-src, > #bsdforen.de, #bsdgroup.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 9 23:24:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677091065673 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:24:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi001.prodigy.net (nlpi001.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EDD8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi001.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m29NOhgT025538; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 18:24:45 -0500 Message-ID: <47D471BB.6090200@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:24:43 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Erik Wilson Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:24:48 -0000 Mel wrote: > On Sunday 09 March 2008 23:32:00 Erik Wilson wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Chris Maness wrote: >> >>> I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache >>> module. It runs fine without the module directives that are >>> automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is compiled and >>> installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. >>> >> Have you upgraded to the latest version of apache to go with the latest >> version of php5? Perhaps you have an older version that isn't binary >> compatible with the latest compiled php. >> > > Bogus. Php works with any apache version it supports. > > Chris: juggle order of /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, see archive for > discussion as to why this can't be handled normally. > > I deleted the file and reinstalled php5 and now it appears to be working. Thanks. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 00:02:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027531065673 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comperr@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0708.google.com (wr-out-0708.google.com [64.233.184.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555D28FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:02:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comperr@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b72so4436685wra.6 for ; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.174.2 with SMTP id w2mr406443ane.16.1205107344811; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <447igcm5oa.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> X-IP: 24.45.43.202 References: <1f43c6f8-0c9b-45a2-92a2-3b51c731a5fd@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <447igcm5oa.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 FreeBSD/i386 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) From: comperr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: subversion -make error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:02:27 -0000 On Mar 9, 12:40 pm, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > comperr writes: > > Hey - when I try "make install clean" on subversion I get > > sr/local/bin/ifnames-2.61 AUTOM4TE=/usr/local/bin/autom4te-2.61 > > AUTORECONF=/usr/local/bin/autoreconf-2.61 AUTOSCAN=/usr/local/bin/ > > autoscan-2.61 AUTOUPDATE=/usr/local/bin/autoupdate-2.61 > > AUTOCONF_VERSION=261 LIBTOOL=/usr/local/bin/libtool LIBTOOLIZE=/usr/ > > local/bin/libtoolize LIBTOOL_M4=/usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool.m4 > > lt_cv_sys_max_cmd_len=262144 /bin/sh ./buildconf > > buildconf: checking installation... > > buildconf: python not found. > > You need python installed > > to build APR from SVN. > > *** Error code 1 > > > This is when I know I have python installed > > Is python installed from the ports system? > What does "which python" tell you? > > -- > Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area > http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing listhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" [root@starfx ~]# which python [root@starfx ~]# pkg_info -x python Information for python-2.5,2: .... Information for python25-2.5.2_1: [root@starfx ~]# pkg_info |grep python python-2.5,2 The "meta-port" for the default version of Python interpret python25-2.5.2_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming language From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 00:37:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69573106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny-mail-01+f.questions20080309@palaceofretention.ca) Received: from www.giovannetti.ca (www.giovannetti.ca [206.248.136.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02AB8FC22 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny-mail-01+f.questions20080309@palaceofretention.ca) Received: from the.palaceofretention.ca (intgateway.palaceofretention.ca [10.10.10.42]) by www.giovannetti.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B7B11435 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:11:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:12:45 -0400 From: Vinny User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:37:49 -0000 Hello Everyone, I was trying to use portupgrade on totem and ran into a problem with references for libc.so.7 failing to resolve. I have a libc.so.6, of course, seeing as libc.so.7 is for FreeBSD 7, isn't it? uname -a FreeBSD the.pal...ofretention.ca 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jan 16 09:32:16 EST 2008 root@the.pal...ofretention.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THE i386 Here is the history output of what I've done: 125 18:45 cd /usr/ports 126 18:45 whereis totem 127 18:45 cd multimedia/totem 128 18:45 portupgrade -rRpP multimedia/totem ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst 129 20:14 cd ../../textproc/libxslt 130 20:14 make clean 131 20:14 make install package ...failed here due to a deinstall/reinstall issue for libgcrypt, just to vex me. 132 20:17 make install package -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst 133 20:18 make clean 134 20:19 make ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst 135 20:20 ls /lib/libc.* ...only libc.so.6 136 20:20 cd ../.. 137 20:20 cvsup self-ports-supfile 138 20:27 cd textproc/libxslt ...update ports tree and try again 139 20:27 make clean 140 20:27 make install package ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst and so on. My current theory is that I've fetched a package that was linked on a FreeBSD 7 system. How can I find out which one? The command that was likely the culprit was: portupgrade -rRpP multimedia/totem Check this out: $ cd /usr/local/bin $ ldd totem totem: libtotem-plparser.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libtotem-plparser.so.1 (0x280bc000) libhal.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libhal.so.1 (0x280cb000) libglade-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglade-2.0.so.0 (0x280d4000) libgnome-desktop-2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2 (0x280ea000) libgnomeui-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 (0x280fd000) libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 (0x28186000) libstartup-notification-1.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libstartup-notification-1.so.0 (0x281a3000) libbonoboui-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 (0x281ab000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28204000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x2820c000) libgnome-keyring.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0 (0x28223000) libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 (0x28232000) libgnome-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnome-2.so.0 (0x2825e000) libgnomevfs-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 (0x28271000) libssl.so.4 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.4 (0x282c9000) libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x282f8000) libavahi-glib.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libavahi-glib.so.1 (0x283f0000) libavahi-client.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libavahi-client.so.3 (0x283f3000) libavahi-common.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libavahi-common.so.3 (0x28401000) libutil.so.5 => /lib/libutil.so.5 (0x2840c000) libesd.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libesd.so.2 (0x28419000) libaudiofile.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libaudiofile.so.0 (0x28422000) libpopt.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so.0 (0x28447000) libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 (0x2844e000) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x28464000) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x287d3000) libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x28858000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x28871000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x28889000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x28892000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x28895000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x288a6000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x288af000) libcairo.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x288b4000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x2892a000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x2894c000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x2897a000) libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x289a4000) libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x289c5000) libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x28a2b000) libbonobo-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0 (0x28a66000) libbonobo-activation.so.4 => /usr/local/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4 (0x28abf000) libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0 (0x28ad3000) libgconf-2.so.4 => /usr/local/lib/libgconf-2.so.4 (0x28ad8000) libORBit-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 (0x28b0a000) libgstvideo-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstvideo-0.10.so.0 (0x28b5c000) libgstaudio-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstaudio-0.10.so.0 (0x28b5f000) libgstbase-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0 (0x28b76000) libgstinterfaces-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstinterfaces-0.10.so.0 (0x28b9a000) libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x28ba3000) libdbus-glib-1.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2 (0x28ba8000) libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libdbus-1.so.3 (0x28bc2000) libXtst.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXtst.so.6 (0x28bf9000) libgstpbutils-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstpbutils-0.10.so.0 (0x28bfe000) libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 (0x28c08000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x28c9a000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x28cd4000) libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 (0x28cd8000) libxml2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 (0x28cdd000) libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28dff000) libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x28e10000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x28e29000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x28ec8000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x28ed1000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x28fc6000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28fcc000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x28fd9000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28fe1000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x290c5000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x290c8000) librpcsvc.so.3 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x290cd000) libpthread.so.2 => /lib/libpthread.so.2 (0x290d5000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x290f9000) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libicui18n.so.36 => /usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.36 (0x291db000) libpcre.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x29301000) libgailutil.so.18 => /usr/local/lib/libgailutil.so.18 (0x29325000) libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0x2932c000) libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x2932f000) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) libicuuc.so.36 => /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.36 (0x29332000) libicudata.so.36 => /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.36 (0x29439000) libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x29de9000) Does anyone have any guidance on how to recover from this? Also, have any packages built on FreeBSD 7 been inadvertently placed in a 6.x repository? Am I missing something obvious? Other possible problem: Power cycle crash occurred a day or so earlier. The fsck processes did not required manual intervention on the next boot--is this an indication that no files were lost? Could I have lost some files (like libc.so.7, for instance) because of the crash? Thanks for helping, Vinny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 02:16:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4B01065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi029.prodigy.net (nlpi029.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ECB8FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi029.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2A2GhOO014407; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:16:46 -0500 Message-ID: <47D49A0C.4090801@chrismaness.com> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:16:44 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:16:49 -0000 Mel wrote: > On Sunday 09 March 2008 23:32:00 Erik Wilson wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Chris Maness wrote: >> >>> I am having apache core dump after I install php5 with the apache >>> module. It runs fine without the module directives that are >>> automagically added to the http.conf file, but after it is compiled and >>> installed my main log (var log messages) indicates a core dump. >>> >> Have you upgraded to the latest version of apache to go with the latest >> version of php5? Perhaps you have an older version that isn't binary >> compatible with the latest compiled php. >> > > Bogus. Php works with any apache version it supports. > > Chris: juggle order of /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini, see archive for > discussion as to why this can't be handled normally. > > OK, after I was able to get apache to load without crashing, none of my php aps worked correctly. I suppose this had to do with me deleting extensions.ini and only rebuilding php5 and not its dependencies. Well, after rebuilding all of the deps, I now have a extensions.ini file again. I tried re-arranging as suggested in the archive, but this did not solve the problem. I am only having this issue on my 7.0-R box. 6.3-R seems to be working ok, but I haven't been fooling with it. I am having the issue on my test box. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 02:53:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CFD1065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EA48FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from localhost (ool-44c03822.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.56.34]) by mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with SMTP id <0JXH00FU2UOA6BG0@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:52:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:52:58 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" In-reply-to: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> To: Vinny Message-id: <20080309225258.22232a58.ejcerejo@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:53:24 -0000 On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:12:45 -0400 Vinny wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I was trying to use portupgrade on totem and ran into a problem with > references for libc.so.7 failing to resolve. I have a libc.so.6, of > course, seeing as libc.so.7 is for FreeBSD 7, isn't it? > > uname -a > FreeBSD the.pal...ofretention.ca 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE > #0: Wed Jan 16 09:32:16 EST 2008 > root@the.pal...ofretention.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THE i386 > > Here is the history output of what I've done: > > 125 18:45 cd /usr/ports > 126 18:45 whereis totem > 127 18:45 cd multimedia/totem > 128 18:45 portupgrade -rRpP multimedia/totem > ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst > > 129 20:14 cd ../../textproc/libxslt > 130 20:14 make clean > 131 20:14 make install package > ...failed here due to a deinstall/reinstall issue for libgcrypt, just > to vex me. > > 132 20:17 make install package -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER > ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst > > 133 20:18 make clean > 134 20:19 make > ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst > > 135 20:20 ls /lib/libc.* > ...only libc.so.6 > 136 20:20 cd ../.. > 137 20:20 cvsup self-ports-supfile > 138 20:27 cd textproc/libxslt > > ...update ports tree and try again > 139 20:27 make clean > 140 20:27 make install package > ...failed here due to libc.so.7 reference in libxlst > > and so on. > > My current theory is that I've fetched a package that was linked > on a FreeBSD 7 system. > > How can I find out which one? The command that was likely the > culprit was: portupgrade -rRpP multimedia/totem > > > Check this out: > $ cd /usr/local/bin > $ ldd totem > totem: > libtotem-plparser.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libtotem-plparser.so.1 > (0x280bc000) > libhal.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libhal.so.1 (0x280cb000) > libglade-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglade-2.0.so.0 (0x280d4000) > libgnome-desktop-2.so.2 => > /usr/local/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.so.2 (0x280ea000) > libgnomeui-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0 (0x280fd000) > libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 (0x28186000) > libstartup-notification-1.so.0 => > /usr/local/lib/libstartup-notification-1.so.0 (0x281a3000) > libbonoboui-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0 > (0x281ab000) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28204000) > libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x2820c000) > libgnome-keyring.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnome-keyring.so.0 > (0x28223000) > libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so.0 > (0x28232000) > libgnome-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnome-2.so.0 (0x2825e000) > libgnomevfs-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0 > (0x28271000) > libssl.so.4 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.4 (0x282c9000) > libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x282f8000) > libavahi-glib.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libavahi-glib.so.1 > (0x283f0000) > libavahi-client.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libavahi-client.so.3 > (0x283f3000) > libavahi-common.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libavahi-common.so.3 > (0x28401000) > libutil.so.5 => /lib/libutil.so.5 (0x2840c000) > libesd.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libesd.so.2 (0x28419000) > libaudiofile.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libaudiofile.so.0 (0x28422000) > libpopt.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpopt.so.0 (0x28447000) > libart_lgpl_2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.5 > (0x2844e000) > libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 > (0x28464000) > libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 > (0x287d3000) > libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x28858000) > libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 > (0x28871000) > libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 > (0x28889000) > libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x28892000) > libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x28895000) > libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x288a6000) > libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x288af000) > libcairo.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x288b4000) > libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x2892a000) > libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 > (0x2894c000) > libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > (0x2897a000) > libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x289a4000) > libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x289c5000) > libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x28a2b000) > libbonobo-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0 (0x28a66000) > libbonobo-activation.so.4 => > /usr/local/lib/libbonobo-activation.so.4 (0x28abf000) > libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0 => > /usr/local/lib/libORBitCosNaming-2.so.0 (0x28ad3000) > libgconf-2.so.4 => /usr/local/lib/libgconf-2.so.4 (0x28ad8000) > libORBit-2.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libORBit-2.so.0 (0x28b0a000) > libgstvideo-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstvideo-0.10.so.0 > (0x28b5c000) > libgstaudio-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstaudio-0.10.so.0 > (0x28b5f000) > libgstbase-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstbase-0.10.so.0 > (0x28b76000) > libgstinterfaces-0.10.so.0 => > /usr/local/lib/libgstinterfaces-0.10.so.0 (0x28b9a000) > libXxf86vm.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXxf86vm.so.1 (0x28ba3000) > libdbus-glib-1.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libdbus-glib-1.so.2 > (0x28ba8000) > libdbus-1.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libdbus-1.so.3 (0x28bc2000) > libXtst.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXtst.so.6 (0x28bf9000) > libgstpbutils-0.10.so.0 => > /usr/local/lib/libgstpbutils-0.10.so.0 (0x28bfe000) > libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgstreamer-0.10.so.0 > (0x28c08000) > libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > (0x28c9a000) > libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 > (0x28cd4000) > libgthread-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 > (0x28cd8000) > libxml2.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 (0x28cdd000) > libz.so.3 => /lib/libz.so.3 (0x28dff000) > libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x28e10000) > libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x28e29000) > libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x28ec8000) > libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x28ed1000) > libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x28fc6000) > libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28fcc000) > libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x28fd9000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28fe1000) > libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x290c5000) > libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x290c8000) > librpcsvc.so.3 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.3 (0x290cd000) > libpthread.so.2 => /lib/libpthread.so.2 (0x290d5000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x290f9000) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libicui18n.so.36 => /usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.36 (0x291db000) > libpcre.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x29301000) > libgailutil.so.18 => /usr/local/lib/libgailutil.so.18 (0x29325000) > libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 > (0x2932c000) > libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x2932f000) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libthr.so.3 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libz.so.4 => not found (0x0) > libm.so.5 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libc.so.7 => not found (0x0) > libicuuc.so.36 => /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.36 (0x29332000) > libicudata.so.36 => /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.36 (0x29439000) > libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x29de9000) > > > Does anyone have any guidance on how to recover from this? > > Also, have any packages built on FreeBSD 7 been inadvertently > placed in a 6.x repository? > > Am I missing something obvious? > > Other possible problem: Power cycle crash occurred a day > or so earlier. The fsck processes did not required manual > intervention on the next boot--is this an indication that > no files were lost? Could I have lost some files (like > libc.so.7, for instance) because of the crash? > > Thanks for helping, > Vinny > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You updated the port that put libc.so.6 in your system, you need to find out which port it came from and then find out which which ports depend on it and rebuild them also and then the problem will be fixed. I use /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdadminscripts which tells me exactly which ports need to be rebuilt. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 03:17:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31371065674 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB768FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:17:04 -0700 Message-ID: <47D4A82F.20900@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:17:03 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070919) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <47CF03A8.9030404@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <47CF03A8.9030404@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Freebsd7, mail/mailman, www/apache22, and sendmail [take 2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:17:04 -0000 No comments, suggestions ? Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Issue: > > The www/apache22 integration seems to be fine; however, the sendmail > integration isn't quite right. > > client computer: > $ echo `uname -a` | mail -s "`date`" mailman@lists.domain.tld > > Mail Server: > /var/log/maillog > m25JwCEk065018: m25JwCEl065018: DSN: unknown mailer error 255 > > m25JwCEl065018: to=, delay=00:00:00 \ > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=mailman, pri=32149, \ > relay=lists.p6m7g8.net, dsn=5.3.0, stat=unknown mailer error 255 > > m25JwCEm065018: return to sender: unknown mailer error 255 > > The setup: > --------------------------------------------------------- > /etc/make.conf > [snipped] > > # SASL (cyrus-sasl v2) sendmail build flags... > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib > SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 > # Adding to enable alternate port (smtps) for sendmail... > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -D_FFR_SMTP_SSL > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/usr/ports/mail/mailman*} > WITH_SENDMAIL= yes > WITH_HTDIG= yes > .endif > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/usr/ports/www/apache22*} > WITH_SSL= yes > WITH_APR_FROM_PORTS= yes > WITH_FULLBUILD= yes > WITH_MYSQL= yes > WITH_PCRE_FROM_PORTS= yes > > WITH_LOG_FORENSIC= yes > WITH_PROXY_CONNECT= yes > WITH_PROXY_FTP= yes > WITH_PROXY_HTTP= yes > WITH_PROXY_AJP= yes > WITH_PROXY_BALANCER= yes > > WITHOUT_MEM_CACHED= yes > .endif > > --------------------------------------------------------- > /var/db/pkg > [snipped] > apache-2.2.8 > apr-nothr-1.2.8_2 > bash-static-3.2.33 > mailman-with-htdig-2.1.9_5 > mysql-client-5.1.23 > pcre-7.6 > python25-2.5.2_1 > cyrus-sasl-2.1.22 > cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.22 > > users: > id mailnull > uid=26(mailnull) gid=26(mailnull) groups=26(mailnull) > > id mailman > uid=91(mailman) gid=91(mailman) groups=91(mailman) > > id www > uid=80(www) gid=80(www) groups=80(www) > > --------------------------------------------------------- > /etc/mail/host.mc > [snipped] > define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/mail/aliases,/etc/mail/lists') > > FEATURE(`smrsh') > FEATURE(mailertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable') > FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') > VIRTUSER_DOMAIN(`lists.domain.tld') > > dnl FEATURE(`limited_masquerade') > dnl MASQUERADE_AS(`lists.domain.tld') > > Mmailman, P=/etc/mail/mm-handler, F=rDFMhlqSu, U=mailman:mailman, > S=EnvFromL, R=EnvToL/HdrToL, > A=mm-handler $h $u > > --------------------------------------------------------- > $ whereis smrsh > smrsh: /usr/libexec/smrsh > > $ strings /usr/libexec/smrsh | grep bin |head -1 > /usr/libexec/sm.bin > > $ ls -l /usr/libexec/sm.bin/ > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 31B Mar 4 18:43:32 2008 mailman@ -> > /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman > > $ ls -l /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mailman - 15K Mar 4 12:45:40 2008 > /usr/local/mailman/mail/mailman* > > $ /usr/local/mailman> sudo bin/check_perms -f > No problems found > > $ cat /etc/mail/mailertable > lists.domain.tld mailman:lists.domain.tld > > $ ls -l /etc/mail/mm-handler > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 5.8K Mar 4 19:10:53 2008 mm-handler* > > --------------------------------------------------------- > /etc/rc.conf > [snipped] > sendmail_enable="YES" > mailman_enable="YES" > apache22_enable="YES" > apache22_http_accept_enable="YES" > > --------------------------------------------------------- > /usr/local/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py > from Defaults import * > > MTA = None > > DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST = 'lists.domain.tld' > DEFAULT_URL_HOST = 'lists.domain.tld' > DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'http://%s/mailman/' > > --------------------------------------------------------- > /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf > User www > Group www > > /usr/local/etc/apache22/vhosts/tld.domain.lists.conf > > > ServerName lists.domain.tld > > DocumentRoot /usr/local/mailman > Alias /icons/ "/usr/local/mailman/icons/" > > Alias /pipermail/ "/usr/local/mailman/archives/public/" > ScriptAlias /mailman/ "/usr/local/mailman/cgi-bin/" > > ErrorLog "/usr/local/mailman/logs/httpd-error_log" > CustomLog "/usr/local/mailman/logs/httpd-access_log" common > CustomLog "/usr/local/mailman/logs/httpd-combined_log" combined > > > Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI > AllowOverride None > Order allow,deny > Allow from all > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > $ uname -a > FreeBSD host.domain.tld 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Sun Mar 2 > 09:48:59 EST 2008 root@builder.domain.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST > i386 > > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 03:35:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFEE106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from bee.hiwaay.net (bee.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB348FC16 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from [10.0.0.183] ([216.186.148.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by bee.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2A3KaB71315378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:20:44 -0500 (CDT) From: David Kelly To: comperr In-Reply-To: References: <1f43c6f8-0c9b-45a2-92a2-3b51c731a5fd@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <447igcm5oa.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:20:36 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: subversion -make error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:35:41 -0000 On Mar 9, 2008, at 7:02 PM, comperr wrote: > On Mar 9, 12:40 pm, Lowell Gilbert well.ilk.org> wrote: >> >> Is python installed from the ports system? >> What does "which python" tell you? >> > [root@starfx ~]# which python > [root@starfx ~]# pkg_info -x python > Information for python-2.5,2: > .... > Information for python25-2.5.2_1: > [root@starfx ~]# pkg_info |grep python > python-2.5,2 The "meta-port" for the default version of Python > interpret > python25-2.5.2_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming > language Python should have been found in /usr/local/bin/python: dkelly@Grumpy {1009} which python /usr/local/bin/python -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 03:49:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3069D106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny-mail-01+f.questions20080309@palaceofretention.ca) Received: from www.giovannetti.ca (www.giovannetti.ca [206.248.136.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0058FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny-mail-01+f.questions20080309@palaceofretention.ca) Received: from the.palaceofretention.ca (intgateway.palaceofretention.ca [10.10.10.42]) by www.giovannetti.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3003D11435 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 22:48:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47D4AFD6.5020401@palaceofretention.ca> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:49:42 -0400 From: Vinny User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> <20080309225258.22232a58.ejcerejo@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <20080309225258.22232a58.ejcerejo@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:49:55 -0000 E. J. Cerejo wrote: > On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:12:45 -0400 Vinny > wrote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I was trying to use portupgrade on totem and ran into a problem >> with references for libc.so.7 failing to resolve. I have a >> libc.so.6, of course, seeing as libc.so.7 is for FreeBSD 7, isn't >> it? >> >> uname -a FreeBSD the.pal...ofretention.ca 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD >> 6.3-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jan 16 09:32:16 EST 2008 >> root@the.pal...ofretention.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THE i386 >> [snip] > > You updated the port that put libc.so.6 in your system, you need to > find out which port it came from and then find out which which ports > depend on it and rebuild them also and then the problem will be > fixed. I use /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdadminscripts which tells me > exactly which ports need to be rebuilt. Hi E. J., Is it true that a port put libc.so.6 in my system? I thought it was part of the base system (i.e. the world as in buildworld). I'm a bit (more) confused now. Vinny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 04:00:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F51E106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782C18FC1A for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from localhost (ool-44c03822.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.56.34]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with SMTP id <0JXH001N5XTBQGF0@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:46 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" In-reply-to: <47D4AFD6.5020401@palaceofretention.ca> To: Vinny Message-id: <20080310000046.6b0d9bc0.ejcerejo@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> <20080309225258.22232a58.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47D4AFD6.5020401@palaceofretention.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:00:48 -0000 On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:49:42 -0400 Vinny wrote: > E. J. Cerejo wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:12:45 -0400 Vinny > > wrote: > > > >> Hello Everyone, > >> > >> I was trying to use portupgrade on totem and ran into a problem > >> with references for libc.so.7 failing to resolve. I have a > >> libc.so.6, of course, seeing as libc.so.7 is for FreeBSD 7, isn't > >> it? > >> > >> uname -a FreeBSD the.pal...ofretention.ca 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD > >> 6.3-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jan 16 09:32:16 EST 2008 > >> root@the.pal...ofretention.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THE i386 > >> > [snip] > > > > > > You updated the port that put libc.so.6 in your system, you need to > > find out which port it came from and then find out which which ports > > depend on it and rebuild them also and then the problem will be > > fixed. I use /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdadminscripts which tells me > > exactly which ports need to be rebuilt. > > > Hi E. J., > > Is it true that a port put libc.so.6 in my system? > I thought it was part of the base system (i.e. the world as in > buildworld). > > I'm a bit (more) confused now. > > Vinny > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Then you're running FreeBSD 6.x and you updated your ports tree after FreeBSD 7.0 release. The latest ports tree no longer supports 6.x I believe. So you should upgrade to 7 release or stable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 04:29:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B5B106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny-mail-01+f.questions20080309@palaceofretention.ca) Received: from www.giovannetti.ca (www.giovannetti.ca [206.248.136.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A818FC17 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vinny-mail-01+f.questions20080309@palaceofretention.ca) Received: from the.palaceofretention.ca (intgateway.palaceofretention.ca [10.10.10.42]) by www.giovannetti.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FD911435 for ; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:27:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47D4B904.3050800@palaceofretention.ca> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:28:52 -0400 From: Vinny User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080301) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> In-Reply-To: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:29:05 -0000 Vinny wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I was trying to use portupgrade on totem and ran into a problem with > references for libc.so.7 failing to resolve. I have a libc.so.6, of > course, seeing as libc.so.7 is for FreeBSD 7, isn't it? > > uname -a > FreeBSD the.pal...ofretention.ca 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE > #0: Wed Jan 16 09:32:16 EST 2008 > root@the.pal...ofretention.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THE i386 > [snip] Well, am I embarrassed. I found an old setting in pkgtools.conf that I set some time ago when I was experimenting with something: PKG_SITES = [ 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-stable/', ] Since 7 is now stable, I get packages built on 7. D'oh. I'll just reset that to the default: pkg_site_mirror() Another self-inflicted problem solved. I just have to rebuild all the affected ports manually. Vinny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 04:42:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF6D1065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thanasi@web01.ahp.ftl.affinity.com) Received: from lvs00-fl-n30.ftl.affinity.com (lvs00-fl-n30.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967328FC1B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thanasi@web01.ahp.ftl.affinity.com) Received: from [64.70.190.10] ([64.70.190.10]:10155 "HELO web01.ahp.ftl.affinity.com") by ams030.ftl.affinity.com with SMTP id S603903AbYCIUn3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:43:29 -0400 Received: by web01.ahp.ftl.affinity.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:43:29 -0400 From: "thelawcorp.com" Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:43:29 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Subject: YOU WON 610,000.00 Euros X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: axainsurre@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:42:57 -0000 Euro Million Lottery Spain Reference Number: ESP/976/08/34 Batch Number: EML/2367/34/08. Dear Winner, We wish to congratulate you over your email success in our computer balloting sweepstake held on the 7TH of March, 2008. This is a Millennium scientific computer game in which email addresses were Used. It is a promotional program aimed at encouraging internet users; Therefore you do not need to buy ticket to enter for it. Your email address Attached to ticket number (25-831-71) drew the lucky numbers 17-50-34-62 which consequently won the draw in the Second category. You have been approve for the star prize of Six Hundred and Ten Thousand Euros (610,000.00 Euros) EQUIVALENT to Nine Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars (900,000.00 UNITED STATES DOLLARS) you are advised to keep this Winning very confidential until you receive your lump prize in your Account this is a protective measure to avoid double claiming by people you May tell as we have had cases like this before, in other to claim your (900,000.00 USD) prize winning, which has been deposited in a Designated bank. However, you will have to fill the form below and send it to Our registered claim agent (AXA INSURANCE COMPANY) for verification and You will be directed to the bank where youre winning funds as been Deposited in your favor. FULL NAMES: AGE: SEX: ADDRESS: EMAIL: PHONE : OCCUPATION: COUNTRY: AMOUNT WON: BATCH NUMBER: REFERENCE NUMBER: Please you are advised to complete the form and send it immediately to Your claims agent (AXA INSURANCE S.A) through this email address: (axainsurre@gmail.com) to help you process your claim For prompt collection of your fund from the designated bank. AXA INSURANCE S.A MADRID SPAIN Contact Person: Mr. William Oscar (Foreign Services Manager) Email: axainsurre@gmail.com Tel: 34 634 193 456 Note: All prize funds must be claimed before the 21TH of March 2008 After this date all funds will be returned back to the Lottery Company As unclaimed fund. Congratulations once again. Yours Faithfully, Mrs.Anna Garcia (Vice President) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 06:08:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F551065676 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:08:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyotr@pisem.net) Received: from mx1.samaradom.ru (june.samaradom.ru [85.113.63.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D1E8FC1D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:08:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyotr@pisem.net) Received: from [10.62.201.191] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx1.samaradom.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JYan0-0001ZV-Ss for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:43:10 +0400 Message-ID: <47D4CA5B.7040905@pisem.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:42:51 +0400 From: "pyotr@pisem.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071030 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 09.03.2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: gmirror panic on smp unloaded but not nextboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:08:48 -0000 Hello everyone, I tried the 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade with cvsup & Co. i already had the gmirror device functioning properly after first mergemaster -p i did boot the 7.0 with nextboot to try. ok, the second mergemaster passed smooth and i tried to boot with old kernel cause forgot about the nextboot last time. ok, on the console i saw the error about wrong gmirror labels version. So to boot the built 7.0 kernel i used the oot loader commands: === unload ( means to unload ALL kernel AND modules, the 6.3 stuff gets completely unloaded ) load /boot/kernel/kernel.70 boot -s === And... see kernel trap 1 right after ata0 and ata1 detection! Sorry no debug information to attach cause it's remote kvm system... More about the hardware: celeron 1.6 dual / 1G / atapi 2x80. Should i submit a PR? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 06:11:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321181065670 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:11:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyotr@pisem.net) Received: from mx1.samaradom.ru (june.samaradom.ru [85.113.63.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9F68FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyotr@pisem.net) Received: from [10.62.201.191] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx1.samaradom.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JYamJ-0001Ya-JB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:42:27 +0400 Message-ID: <47D4CA2A.90603@pisem.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:42:02 +0400 From: "pyotr@pisem.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071030 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 09.03.2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: gmirror panic on smp unloaded but not nextboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:11:51 -0000 Hello everyone, I tried the 6.3 to 7.0 upgrade with cvsup & Co. i already had the gmirror device functioning properly after first mergemaster -p i did boot the 7.0 with nextboot to try. ok, the second mergemaster passed smooth and i tried to boot with old kernel cause forgot about the nextboot last time. ok, on the console i saw the error about wrong gmirror labels version. So to boot the built 7.0 kernel i used the oot loader commands: === unload ( means to unload ALL kernel AND modules, the 6.3 stuff gets completely unloaded ) load /boot/kernel/kernel.70 boot -s === And... see kernel trap 1 right after ata0 and ata1 detection! Sorry no debug information to attach cause it's remote kvm system... More about the hardware: celeron 1.6 dual / 1G / atapi 2x80. Should i submit a PR? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 06:35:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB8B106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161C58FC26 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2A6YrZ3094568; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:34:55 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2A6YrZ3094568 Message-ID: <47D4D686.8070905@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:34:46 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <47CF03A8.9030404@p6m7g8.com> <47D4A82F.20900@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <47D4A82F.20900@p6m7g8.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9735966ADC5F7ECAC73BFE73" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:34:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6188/Sun Mar 9 19:28:13 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Freebsd7, mail/mailman, www/apache22, and sendmail [take 2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:35:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9735966ADC5F7ECAC73BFE73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> /etc/mail/host.mc >> [snipped] >> define(`ALIAS_FILE', `/etc/mail/aliases,/etc/mail/lists') >> >> FEATURE(`smrsh') >> FEATURE(mailertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable') >> FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') >> VIRTUSER_DOMAIN(`lists.domain.tld') >> >> dnl FEATURE(`limited_masquerade') >> dnl MASQUERADE_AS(`lists.domain.tld') You need MAILER_DEFINITIONS right about here in your .mc file. >> Mmailman, P=3D/etc/mail/mm-handler, F=3DrDFMhlqSu, U=3Dmailman:m= ailman, >> S=3DEnvFromL, R=3DEnvToL/HdrToL, >> A=3Dmm-handler $h $u You may also need some custom rulesets so that sendmail knows when to hand off messages to the mailman mailer, either under LOCAL_RULESETS or one of the other special LOCAL_* macros -- see /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README particularly the section headed 'ADDING NEW MAILERS OR RULESETS'. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9735966ADC5F7ECAC73BFE73 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkfU1o0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzbowCfYW5rqpOziSlA1O2SENX/zC1p Tk0AnjGc7mSX2tVMWJcNjAbdG/YovsXd =cdxm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9735966ADC5F7ECAC73BFE73-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 06:46:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D694E106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EDA8FC1D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from smgellar.p6m7g8.net (70.88.236.22) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Sun, 9 Mar 2008 23:46:42 -0700 Message-ID: <47D4D953.8010109@p6m7g8.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:46:43 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071217) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <47CF03A8.9030404@p6m7g8.com> <47D4A82F.20900@p6m7g8.com> <47D4D686.8070905@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <47D4D686.8070905@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Freebsd7, mail/mailman, www/apache22, and sendmail [take 2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:46:42 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: OOOh, I got the correct person to respond.... :) > You need MAILER_DEFINITIONS right about here in your .mc file. I snipped them out -- full file is available here: http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/sendmail.mc > You may also need some custom rulesets so that sendmail knows > when to hand off messages to the mailman mailer, either under > LOCAL_RULESETS or one of the other special LOCAL_* macros -- see > /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README particularly the section headed > 'ADDING NEW MAILERS OR RULESETS'. I thought the mailertable table took care of this which I listed the previous mail. I have no user accounts on lists.domain.tld; however, I do have user email accounts on domain.tld and otherdomains.tld Thanks for the help. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c:703.336.9354 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.txt http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 06:55:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03944106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1308FC1C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2A6tZpV036991; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:36 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2A6tZpV036991 Message-ID: <47D4DB60.1000901@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:28 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "E. J. Cerejo" References: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> <20080309225258.22232a58.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47D4AFD6.5020401@palaceofretention.ca> <20080310000046.6b0d9bc0.ejcerejo@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <20080310000046.6b0d9bc0.ejcerejo@optonline.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig13FE3DF99F946E8C7366A034" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6188/Sun Mar 9 19:28:13 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions , Vinny Subject: Re: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 06:55:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig13FE3DF99F946E8C7366A034 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable E. J. Cerejo wrote: > On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:49:42 -0400 > Vinny wrote: >=20 >> E. J. Cerejo wrote: >>> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:12:45 -0400 Vinny >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> I was trying to use portupgrade on totem and ran into a problem >>>> with references for libc.so.7 failing to resolve. I have a >>>> libc.so.6, of course, seeing as libc.so.7 is for FreeBSD 7, isn't >>>> it? >>>> >>>> uname -a FreeBSD the.pal...ofretention.ca 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD >>>> 6.3-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jan 16 09:32:16 EST 2008=20 >>>> root@the.pal...ofretention.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THE i386 >>>> >> [snip] >> >> >>> You updated the port that put libc.so.6 in your system, you need to >>> find out which port it came from and then find out which which ports >>> depend on it and rebuild them also and then the problem will be >>> fixed. I use /usr/ports/sysutils/bsdadminscripts which tells me >>> exactly which ports need to be rebuilt. >> >> Hi E. J., >> >> Is it true that a port put libc.so.6 in my system? >> I thought it was part of the base system (i.e. the world as in >> buildworld). >> >> I'm a bit (more) confused now. libc.so.6 is part of the base system. > Then you're running FreeBSD 6.x and you updated your ports tree after > FreeBSD 7.0 release. The latest ports tree no longer supports 6.x I > believe. So you should upgrade to 7 release or stable. Utter twaddle. The ports tree certainly does still support 6.x. To the OP: yes, your initial thought that libc.so.6 comes with RELENG_6_X and libc.so.7 is part of anything RELENG_7_X -- that is completely correct. If you're running a 6.x machine, then nothing should be linking against libc.so.7 -- that sort of forward compatibility is not possible. (Unlike= the inverse case, where you can have applications linked against a 6.x world running under 7.x). I suspect that what has happened is that you've inadvertently installed packages compiled for release 7.0 on a 6.3 system -- which as you've foun= d, does not work. This is a problem that can *only* occur with pre-compiled= packages. If you build the software out of ports directly on your 6.3 machines, it will automatically have the correct linkage to libc.so.6. =20 Note that you may need to rebuild applications further up the dependency tree than just the particular one you pointed out: shlibs and loadable modules can depend on other shlibs in as arbitrarily complex a fashion as= you can imagine. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig13FE3DF99F946E8C7366A034 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkfU22cACgkQ8Mjk52CukIycMACghDzX0kyxT09bhRanSyhgmc/N 6ZUAmwbYVyMOfmO1w9992wdoDRudA0oI =uz5N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig13FE3DF99F946E8C7366A034-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 07:46:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F59106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D078FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from smgellar.p6m7g8.net (70.88.236.22) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:46:45 -0700 Message-ID: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 03:46:46 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071217) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: atacontrol mode D PIO4 persist across reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:46:46 -0000 /var/run/dmesg.boot ad2: 28667MB at ata1-master UDMA33 ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711965 ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0 ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711951 ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0 ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711964 ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=0 .... 10-30 minutes later, it finally gets through the boot. /etc/fstab: /dev/ad2s1 /X ufs rw 2 2 the problem here is the device needs to be PIO4 $ atacontrol mode ad2 PIO4 current mode = PIO4 My problem is how do I get this to persist across reboot ? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c:703.336.9354 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.txt http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 07:47:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940A11065670 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:47:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05428FC1B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2A7l5N3001216; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:47:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2A7kdCG001082; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:46:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:46:39 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jeremy Johnston In-Reply-To: <47D45E21.5010709@smart-serv.net> Message-ID: <20080310084628.T1013@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47D45E21.5010709@smart-serv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: K8N-VM CSM not seeing over 2240MB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:47:29 -0000 use PAE or (even better) 64-bit kernel On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Jeremy Johnston wrote: > I have been trying to trouble shoot a problem where my 32bit kernel will > not see past 2240MB of RAM where as the BIOS reports it as 3GB. Windows > on the same machine sees all 3GB. > > My dmesg can be found at http://www.smart-serv.net/~jeremy/dmesg.txt > > Any suggestions on what could be the cause of this would be greatly > appreciated. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 07:50:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176411065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (mail.smart-serv.net [208.68.18.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FED8FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "") Received: from localhost (ldap.smart-serv.net [208.68.18.197]) by mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 8367A2E5C5D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:50:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.0.41] (S0106000d87073d15.nb.shawcable.net [70.74.68.215]) by mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60652E5C5B; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:50:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <47D4E841.6030700@smart-serv.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:50:25 -0600 From: Jeremy Johnston User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <47D45E21.5010709@smart-serv.net> <20080310084628.T1013@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080310084628.T1013@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: K8N-VM CSM not seeing over 2240MB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:50:47 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > use PAE or (even better) 64-bit kernel > > > On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Jeremy Johnston wrote: > >> I have been trying to trouble shoot a problem where my 32bit kernel will >> not see past 2240MB of RAM where as the BIOS reports it as 3GB. Windows >> on the same machine sees all 3GB. >> >> My dmesg can be found at http://www.smart-serv.net/~jeremy/dmesg.txt >> >> Any suggestions on what could be the cause of this would be greatly >> appreciated. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > I attempted PAE but it panics with some modules I require. And I would gladly go to 64bit if I didnt need the nvidia drivers. But there is no reason the kernel should see less then 3GB when x86 can handle up to 4. Bit confused on this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 08:06:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B864106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BC18FC1D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-287704.home.otenet.gr [85.73.171.118]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m2A86Hpf029049; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:06:18 +0200 Message-ID: <47D4EC0C.9010300@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:06:36 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd Questions Subject: Re: atacontrol mode D PIO4 persist across reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:06:21 -0000 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > /var/run/dmesg.boot > ad2: 28667MB at ata1-master UDMA33 > ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711965 > ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=0 > ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711951 > ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (0 retries left) LBA=0 > ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=58711964 > ad2: FAILURE - READ_DMA timed out LBA=0 > .... > 10-30 minutes later, it finally gets through the boot. > > /etc/fstab: > /dev/ad2s1 /X ufs rw 2 2 > > the problem here is the device needs to be PIO4 > > $ atacontrol mode ad2 PIO4 > current mode = PIO4 > > My problem is how do I get this to persist across reboot ? > > Have a look at man 4 ata Your answer is probably: hw.ata.ata_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf Are you sure it is not a faulty (or failing) disk though? This size / age drive should have no problem running in DMA mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 08:33:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C3E1065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D57F8FC27 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from smgellar.p6m7g8.net (70.88.236.22) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:33:34 -0700 Message-ID: <47D4F25F.5050109@p6m7g8.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 04:33:35 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071217) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> <47D4EC0C.9010300@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47D4EC0C.9010300@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd Questions Subject: Re: atacontrol mode D PIO4 persist across reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:33:34 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Have a look at man 4 ata > Your answer is probably: > > hw.ata.ata_dma=0 This sets it for all controllers I only want to set it for ata1 which contains ad2. Thanks for the tip though. ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] ad0: 19092MB at ata0-master UDMA33 ad1: 38166MB at ata0-slave UDMA33 ad2: 28667MB at ata1-master UDMA33 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c:703.336.9354 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.txt http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 08:50:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4B4106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:50:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3CC8FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JYdhs-0003FN-E2; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:50:04 +0000 Received: from melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id m2A8VnPL029555; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:31:49 GMT Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 68133FCA4B0; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:31:43 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:31:43 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Jeremy Johnston Message-ID: <20080310083143.GB622@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <47D45E21.5010709@smart-serv.net> <20080310084628.T1013@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47D4E841.6030700@smart-serv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D4E841.6030700@smart-serv.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:31:50 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: K8N-VM CSM not seeing over 2240MB RAM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:50:10 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 01:50:25AM -0600, Jeremy Johnston wrote: > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >use PAE or (even better) 64-bit kernel > > > > > >On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Jeremy Johnston wrote: > > > >>I have been trying to trouble shoot a problem where my 32bit kernel will > >>not see past 2240MB of RAM where as the BIOS reports it as 3GB. Windows > >>on the same machine sees all 3GB. > >> > >>My dmesg can be found at http://www.smart-serv.net/~jeremy/dmesg.txt > >> > >>Any suggestions on what could be the cause of this would be greatly > >>appreciated. > >> > > > > I attempted PAE but it panics with some modules I require. And I would > gladly go to 64bit if I didnt need the nvidia drivers. > But there is no reason the kernel should see less then 3GB when x86 can > handle up to 4. Bit confused on this. > You could try putting: hw.physmem="2951045120" in /boot/loader.conf -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 10:17:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEAB1065673; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.schuller@infidyne.com) Received: from smtp.infidyne.com (ds9.infidyne.com [88.80.6.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6288FC17; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.schuller@infidyne.com) Received: from c-a916e555.03-51-73746f3.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (c-a916e555.03-51-73746f3.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [85.229.22.169]) by smtp.infidyne.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C210279E6C; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:01:00 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Schuller To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:02:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1442571.c9xNI2Xnyr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803101102.42533.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> Cc: Chris , Adrian Chadd , Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:17:05 -0000 --nextPart1442571.c9xNI2Xnyr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > The people complaining about hardware compatibility need > to pull their heads out. If they are buying brand new systems > they are utter fools if they don't check out in advance > what works and what doesen't. It's not like there's a > shortage of experienced people on this list who could > tell them what to buy. And if after the fact they find out > their shiny new PC won't run FreeBSD - then they take it > back to the retailer and exchange it for a different model. > Why is this so difficult? The difficulty is not in checking out hardware before hand, the problem is= =20 =46INDING hardware that satisfies your requirements. Just because I know th= at=20 NIC so-and-so is recommended, it does not mean that I can find a complete=20 server that: * Is within the budget. * Whose NIC is recommended for use in FreeBSD. * Whose disk/raid controller is recommended for use in FreeBSD - Including proper handling of write caching, cache flushing, etc * Is being sold in a fashion that is acceptable with respect to hardware=20 support / replacement parts. * Otherwise is known to work with well FreeBSD. If you are a large company buying 200 servers I'm sure it's not a problem t= o=20 get sample servers to try things on, or go for more expensive options just= =20 because of perceived FreeBSD compatibility.=20 If you're a poor sod trying to get *one* machine for personal or small-comp= any=20 use and you want something that works and is stable, especially if you want= =20 it rack mountable, it is NOT necessarily trivial. Part of it is the problem= =20 of finding a solution that meets the requirements, and parts of it is about= =20 figuring out whether a particular solution DOES meet the requirements. =46or example, once your cheaper Dell server has arrived and you suddenly n= otice=20 that it's delivered without a BBU, and clearly has write caching turned on= =20 based on performance, try asking (remember, this is a lonely customer with = a=20 single service) Dell hardware support whether that particular controller wi= ll=20 honor cache flush requests right down to the constituent drives... I did, a= nd=20 eventually got a response after 1-2 weeks. But the response was such that I= =20 could not feel confident that the question was accurately forwarded to the= =20 right individual. =2D-=20 / Peter Schuller PGP userID: 0xE9758B7D or 'Peter Schuller ' Key retrieval: Send an E-Mail to getpgpkey@scode.org E-Mail: peter.schuller@infidyne.com Web: http://www.scode.org --nextPart1442571.c9xNI2Xnyr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBH1QdCDNor2+l1i30RAib3AKCrjKK4aI6tGOZB9mwm5BGBy/9YTQCg19lt fyqQQSluStAW9X3czd2joj0= =nQK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1442571.c9xNI2Xnyr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 10:19:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1116B106567D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:19:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FCB8FC22 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC2E10E689; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:18:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBFKvg4ViEDK; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:18:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C730710E6DF; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:18:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:21:21 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.3) Professional Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1108801208.20080310112121@rulez.sk> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> References: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd Questions Subject: Re: atacontrol mode D PIO4 persist across reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:19:26 -0000 Hello Philip, Monday, March 10, 2008, 8:46:46 AM, you wrote: > $ atacontrol mode ad2 PIO4 > current mode = PIO4 > My problem is how do I get this to persist across reboot ? putting it into /etc/rc.conf.local should work... -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 10:26:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141DE1065754 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net (ptb-relay02.plus.net [212.159.14.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B96A8FC23 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=kestrel.milibyte.co.uk) by ptb-relay02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JYfCl-0006o3-8s; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:03 +0000 Received: by kestrel.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JYfCj-0000MY-Iw; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:02 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:00 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <6293ba970803091028v51449aeax32cbd14617cc4967@mail.gmail.com> <20080309191627.J1605@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080309191627.J1605@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803101026.01220.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on kestrel.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: d135e4bf47ef047a6ce2aeed3d67a809 Subject: Re: cdrecord, CD-R error messages with 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:07 -0000 On Sunday 09 March 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > it's good idea to remove atapicd from kernel while using atapicam - don't > keep both. > > personally - i use only atapicam. I have a similar problem so tried removing atapicd from my kernel but still have the problem. At boot time I get: Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle unknown: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x48 0x00 0x01 unknown: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x48 0x00 0x01 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 3.300MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [1592080 x 2048 byte records] Then when writing and verifying a CD I get: unknown: WARNING - unknown CMD (0xac) read data overrun 8>0 unknown: WARNING - unknown CMD (0xac) read data overrun 8>0 unknown: WARNING - unknown CMD (0xac) read data overrun 8>0 unknown: WARNING - unknown CMD (0xac) read data overrun 8>0 unknown: FAILURE - READ_DVD_STRUCTURE ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x30 ascq=0x02 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - READ_BUFFER ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - READ_TOC ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 unknown: FAILURE - MODE_SENSE_BIG ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00 sks=0x4d 0x00 0x02 cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 262144 bytes, which is greater than DFLTPHYS(65536) cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 260096 bytes, which is greater than DFLTPHYS(65536) cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 258048 bytes, which is greater than DFLTPHYS(65536) cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 256000 bytes, which is greater than DFLTPHYS(65536) cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 253952 bytes, which is greater than DFLTPHYS(65536) cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 251904 bytes, which is greater than DFLTPHYS(65536) followed by lots more cam_periph_mapmem warnings. Desoite all this the CD verifies OK - should I worry? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 10:49:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0751D106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:49:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ibb_orac@mbox.contact.bg) Received: from sd97.btc-net.bg (SD97.btc-net.bg [212.39.90.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C69D8FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ibb_orac@mbox.contact.bg) Received: (qmail 27359 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 10:22:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chameleon) (83.228.34.40) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 10:22:45 -0000 Message-ID: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> From: "Ivailo Bonev" To: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:22:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: mail server from Windows to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:49:28 -0000 Hello FreeBSDers, I have a Windows machine that get all e-mails, from few accounts, from different Internet providers. I want to setup FreeBSD machine that get all mails from accounts and remote and local users get their mails from that FreeBSD mail storage server. I don't own a domain or MX records. I read many docs in Intrernet, and now I have installed FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE, with installed fetchmail port (to get mail from various accounts), sendmail-sasl port, and dovecot for IMAP server. But now I'm lost, from where to start configuring FreeBSD mail server? And one last thing, how can deliver all mail messages from Outlook Express client from Windows machine to FreeBSD mail server machine? Any help is appreciated! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 11:08:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE56C1065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859D78FC1A for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDC41EE88C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:42:06 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.07 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.07 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.199, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jsiu8OMRCOwI for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:41:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917CD1EE901 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:41:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D51077.9010407@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:41:59 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080127) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: CUPS installation, ghostscript patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:08:09 -0000 I'm installing CUPS and I get the question below. I honestly don't know what filename to write. Any suggestions? Thanks Leslie ---------------------------------------------------------------- > ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/ghostscript. => Attempting to fetch from http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ghostscript/. ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2 100% of 12 MB 890 kBps 00m00s => Font.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/ghostscript. => Attempting to fetch from http://www.interq.or.jp/mars/cherry/mac/. Font.tar.bz2 100% of 2198 B 9670 kBps ===> Extracting for ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2. => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ijs-0.35.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ijs-0.35.tar.bz2. => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/epag-3.09.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/epag-3.09.tar.gz. => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/Font.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/Font.tar.bz2. >>> in post-extract ... >>> extracting epag-3.09.tar.gz ... >>> extracting Font.tar.bz2 ... ===> Patching for ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 File to patch: ----------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 12:06:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191961065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B691D8FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:09:20 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m2AC6oii013814; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:06:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:06:50 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Leslie Jensen Message-ID: <20080310120648.GA13530@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <47D51077.9010407@eskk.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <47D51077.9010407@eskk.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2008 12:09:20.0993 (UTC) FILETIME=[928D1D10:01C882A7] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CUPS installation, ghostscript patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:06:54 -0000 El da Monday, March 10, 2008 a las 11:41:59AM +0100, Leslie Jensen escribi: > I'm installing CUPS and I get the question below. I honestly don't know > what filename to write. Any suggestions? > > Thanks > Leslie On my 7.0R after updating all ports with portsnap fetch/extract this port installed fine: $ pkg_info | fgrep ghostscript-gpl ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 GPL Postscript interpreter I've just looked into the Makefile of this port and it was commited on March 4 of this year; matthias > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in > /usr/ports/distfiles/ghostscript. > => Attempting to fetch from > http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/ghostscript/. > ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2 100% of 12 MB 890 kBps > 00m00s > => Font.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/ghostscript. > => Attempting to fetch from http://www.interq.or.jp/mars/cherry/mac/. > Font.tar.bz2 100% of 2198 B 9670 kBps > ===> Extracting for ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 > => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ghostscript-8.61.tar.bz2. > => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ijs-0.35.tar.bz2. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/ijs-0.35.tar.bz2. > => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/epag-3.09.tar.gz. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/epag-3.09.tar.gz. > => MD5 Checksum OK for ghostscript/Font.tar.bz2. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for ghostscript/Font.tar.bz2. > >>> in post-extract ... > >>> extracting epag-3.09.tar.gz ... > >>> extracting Font.tar.bz2 ... > ===> Patching for ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ghostscript-gpl-8.61_3 > File to patch: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ Don't top-post, read RFC1855 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 12:10:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8581065670 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D008FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id B956578D22; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:55 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [83.205.52.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1963178CCC for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D52116.2010008@nicoelro.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:52:54 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Import bayes_* for SpamAssassin from Debian to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:10:30 -0000 Hello, I must export a SpamAssassin configuration in a GNU/Linux Debian 4.0. See these files: root@fidji .spamassassin # file * auto-whitelist: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order) auto-whitelist.mutex: ASCII text bayes_journal: ASCII text bayes.mutex: ASCII text bayes_seen: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order) bayes_toks: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 8, native byte-order) bayes_toks.dump: ASCII text user_prefs: ASCII English text root@fidji .spamassassin # spamc -V SpamAssassin Client version 3.1.5 This is my SpamAssassin on FreeBSD (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin port) : root@trinite .spamassassin # spamc -V SpamAssassin Client version 3.2.4 compiled with SSL support (OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007) However, when I use these files in my ~/.spamassassin, on my FreeBSD, I have errors: spamd[51854]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate file type or format spamd[51854]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate file type or format spamd[51854]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist: Inappropriate file type or format I don't understand, because they're only Berkeley databases... See the command file on these files in FreeBSD: auto-whitelist: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order) auto-whitelist.mutex: ASCII text bayes.mutex: ASCII text bayes_journal: ASCII text bayes_seen: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 7, native byte-order) bayes_toks: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 8, native byte-order) bayes_toks.dump: ASCII text user_prefs: ASCII English text I tried to just import a dump from Debian (with db4.1_dump) and rebuild the database in FreeBSD (with db41_load), the problem is the same. How could I re-use these files? They are very important. Thanks for your help. -Nicolas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 12:57:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD721065679 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDF88FC27 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2ACvahu010262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:36 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2ACvahu010262 Message-ID: <47D53040.8000508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:36 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nicolas@nicoelro.net References: <47D52116.2010008@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <47D52116.2010008@nicoelro.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:37 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6191/Mon Mar 10 10:45:33 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Import bayes_* for SpamAssassin from Debian to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:57:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Nicolas Letellier wrote: > However, when I use these files in my ~/.spamassassin, on my FreeBSD, I > have errors: > > spamd[51854]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases > /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate > file type or format > spamd[51854]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases > /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate > file type or format > spamd[51854]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: > auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path > /var/spool/spamd/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist: Inappropriate file type > or format > > I don't understand, because they're only Berkeley databases... You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as you were using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules SpamAssassin uses for BerkeleyDB access to use that version too. "Same" in this context means the first two field in the BDB version number should match -- the last field (a.k.a 'patchlevel') isn't significant. You can install multiple BDB versions in parallel from the ports tree, but to force the perl ports to link against the chosen variant you'll need something like: WITH_BDB_VER= 44 in /etc/make.conf. (See /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk for the possible values) Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREDAAYFAkfVMEAACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VaEDQCgpriBLoXycXtGmJPYDzMLfkoz a4AAoJsKhFvStJpGXdNBXyZnL4xYy8N9 =dNeE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 13:12:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6EA106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AD18FC1E for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 5157678D23; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:12:04 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [83.205.52.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF9878CCC; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:12:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D533A2.9030409@nicoelro.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:12:02 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman , FreeBSD Questions References: <47D52116.2010008@nicoelro.net> <47D53040.8000508@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <47D53040.8000508@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Import bayes_* for SpamAssassin from Debian to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:12:05 -0000 Matthew Seaman a écrit : > You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as you were > using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules SpamAssassin > uses for BerkeleyDB access to use that version too. I use the same BerkeleyDB. I use db41 on FreeBSD (and db41* commands) and db41 on Debian (and db.41* commands). `file`commands returns the same headers of the file on Debian and the defaults ~/.spamassassin/tok*. When I try this: root@trinite .spamassassin # sa-learn --import --dbpath . bayes: cannot open bayes databases ./bayes_* R/O: tie failed: Inappropriate file type or format upgrading to DB_File, please be patient: ./old_bayes_seen DB_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied GDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied NDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied SDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied upgrading to DB_File, please be patient: ./old_bayes_toks DB_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied GDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied NDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied SDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied import failed, original files saved with "old" prefix What must I do? Do you think it's a Perl problem? -Nicolas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 13:28:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DF6106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFD418FC17 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: (qmail 8190 invoked by uid 79); 10 Mar 2008 13:01:52 -0000 Received: from 192.168.64.1 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/6188. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(192.168.64.1):. Processed in 0.019554 secs); 10 Mar 2008 13:01:52 -0000 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.64.1):. Processed in 0.019554 secs Process 8183) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo.ipad.com.br) (mario.lobo@ipad.com.br@192.168.64.1) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 13:01:52 -0000 From: Mario Lobo Organization: IPAD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:01:57 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 X-Face: ,55PTLsK{\?org*WH[[%>IJpi}pb?lwVxsDL<:}(Ti2yN(w/k\"enXx"?CbN[hp Subject: [OT?] tcpdump overhead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:28:36 -0000 Hi there; =46orgive this possible OT (and lame) question. I am writing a final paper for a PG course and I need to take precise=20 measurements on network performance. I gonna be doing lots of packet dumps= =20 and I would like to know you guys' opinion on how much of tcpdump overhead= =20 (if meaningful for these measurements) I should take into account. If there are any readings on the subject you could point me to... Thanks =2D-=20 Mario Lobo Seguran=E7a de Redes - Desenvolvimento e An=E1lise IPAD - Instituto de Pesquisa e Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Tecnol=F3gico e=20 Cient=EDfico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 13:43:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C0C1065674 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230038FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 09:43:50 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OMO59517; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:43:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 08:42:46 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:43:57 -0400 To: Xihong Yin In-Reply-To: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:43:55 -0000 Xihong Yin writes: > My FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time. How should I fix > it? I'm having the same problem with -CURRENT. I have updated the zoneinfo files (using misc/zoneinfo) and (re-)run tzsetup, but am still a hour behind. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 13:52:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA1B1065679 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:52:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@semaphore-software.com) Received: from smtp2.semaphore-software.com (smtp2.semaphore-software.com [66.7.149.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A80A8FC25 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@semaphore-software.com) Received: from smtp.software-programming-india.com ([66.7.149.60]) by smtp2.semaphore-software.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.0.1.2(4.0.1.38868)); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:30:34 -0500 X-VirtualServer: semaphore-software.com, smtp2.semaphore-software.com, 66.7.149.64 X-VirtualServerGroup: semaphore-software.com X-Destination-ID: questions@freebsd.org X-MailingID: 1193137112::603::811::700::3448::3448 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-SMFBL: cXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3Jn X-Mailer: StrongMail Enterprise 4.0.1.2(4.0.1.38868) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=semaphore; d=semaphore-software.com; q=dns; b=Psa5LO2fbXhX0jVwecyuyDyChSfpyBBHrb35aets2goX/Gc1UnBa9LUM08TiXKXZMXWrj3HmLiv3ITYFvGPUKliCdC1tZ6knkHUaRsEhOfAJOhqW5fjgja5sM0oxg+Z0Q1SmHJkXc/hjq/DI6B6FgTxgAKc9yhhLjTZltAK9P2o= DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=semaphore-software.com; s=semaphore; i=@semaphore-software.com; h=Content-Disposition: Content-Type:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Date:To: From; b=RY4KbuAm/y4E+hI3mweADs4yhB3zTgCV1QOGCgJe0YmR207lAJOfb+OkK opiT4WZ9dBiS9jPycNFBUTIHsisNO7m4T7i0Ozf1873+7K9zNdpfTrZmj+B4r1MN ScmZxkPBcZ6/CxHwTIoL8mYNJBKk7tp6huzpPID1Usv6hgn2I8= Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <1193137112.3448@semaphore-software.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:30:33 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org From: "Semaphore Software" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Offshore software service offer from Semaphore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: info@semaphore-software.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:52:25 -0000 **Advertisement** [1]Offshore Software Deveopment Company | Semaphore | CMMi3 [2]COMPANY | [3]OFFSHORE DEVELOPMENT | [4]SERVICES | [5]TECHNOLOGY | [6]BPO | [7]CLIENTELE | [8]CONTACT [nox_top_bg.jpg] OUR COMPANY [bullet_green.gif] A fastest growing Indian Software Development Company with more than 15 years of industry experience [bullet_green.gif] SEI CMMi Level 3 Organization [bullet_green.gif] ISO/IEC 27001 Information Security [bullet_green.gif] Have completed more than 1500+ offshore software development projects [bullet_green.gif] Successful track record of 100% offshore projects delivery [bullet_green.gif] Offshore Development Center at India with strength of more than 300 [box_bot_bg.jpg] [nox_top_bg.jpg] WHAT WE OFFER Semaphore's highly skilled & experienced team is offering Offshore Development Services in the following areas: [bullet_green.gif] Software Development services in Microsoft .NET, Java, Linux [bullet_green.gif] Custom Internet Solutions, e-Commerce and CMS [bullet_green.gif] Website Design & Development, Portals & Multimedia Services [bullet_green.gif] Legacy Application Re-engineering, Software Porting and Migration Services [bullet_green.gif] Software Product Development and Maintenance Services [box_bot_bg.jpg] Call us on 201-777-2366 to know more [9]Requst A Quote Semaphore Software 124 Windsor St. 2nd Floor, Kearny, NJ 07032 United States Phone : 201-777-2366 Fax : 201-917-1367 Email : [10]info@semaphore-software.com Website : [11]www.semaphore-software.com If you feel you receive this message in error, then [12]"click here" Please give us 48 hours to remove you from our mailing list. References 1. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmpexA-qd.html#MapMap 2. http://www.semaphore-software.com/offshore_outsourcing_india/aboutus.htm 3. http://semaphore-software.com/offshore-outsourcing/offshore_outsourcing_services.htm 4. http://semaphore-software.com/software-solution/offshore_software_web_bpo_services.htm 5. http://semaphore-software.com/technology_offering/technology_offering.htm 6. http://semaphore-software.com/bpo_business_process_outsourcing/bpo_business_process_outsourcing.htm 7. http://semaphore-software.com/offshore_outsourcing_india/clientele.htm 8. http://semaphore-software.com/offshore_outsourcing_india/contactus.htm 9. LYNXIMGMAP:file://localhost/tmp/tmpexA-qd.html#Map2Map 10. mailto:info@semaphore-software.com 11. http://www.semaphore-software.com/ 12. http://www.semaphore-software.com/unsubscribe.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 13:57:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3326D106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC58B8FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2ADvro7011005 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:53 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2ADvro7011005 Message-ID: <47D53E60.4000509@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nicolas@nicoelro.net References: <47D52116.2010008@nicoelro.net> <47D53040.8000508@infracaninophile.co.uk> <47D533A2.9030409@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <47D533A2.9030409@nicoelro.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6191/Mon Mar 10 10:45:33 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Import bayes_* for SpamAssassin from Debian to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:57:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Nicolas Letellier wrote: > Matthew Seaman a écrit : >> You'll need to install the same version of Berkeley DB on FreeBSD as >> you were >> using on Debian -- and you'll have to compile the perl modules >> SpamAssassin >> uses for BerkeleyDB access to use that version too. > I use the same BerkeleyDB. I use db41 on FreeBSD (and db41* commands) > and db41 on Debian (and db.41* commands). > `file`commands returns the same headers of the file on Debian and the > defaults ~/.spamassassin/tok*. > > When I try this: > root@trinite .spamassassin # sa-learn --import --dbpath . > bayes: cannot open bayes databases ./bayes_* R/O: tie failed: > Inappropriate file type or format > upgrading to DB_File, please be patient: ./old_bayes_seen > DB_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > GDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > NDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > SDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > upgrading to DB_File, please be patient: ./old_bayes_toks > DB_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > GDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > NDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > SDBM_File: no database of that kind found, nothing copied > import failed, original files saved with "old" prefix > > > What must I do? Do you think it's a Perl problem? Hmmm.... assuming that the debian box and the new FreeBSD box have the same CPU architecture -- ie. both i386 machines the .db files should be compatible. I /think/ they're compatible between a 32 and a 64 bit machine of the same endian-ness BICBW. Can you confirm that the copies of the files on the FreeBSD box are byte-for-byte identical to the originals on the Debian box? The easiest way to do this is to generate MD5 or similar checksums on both. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREDAAYFAkfVPmAACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VYxAQCeJmgCIqh5A7SzvGfiOmV/lGWU jBoAnjYBv8F+fh/0Nx9Ms1nizDFz7oSu =OUTN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:11:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10CF106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6BE8FC20 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AEAUPQ074699; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:10:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:12:19 -0500 To: Robert Huff , Xihong Yin From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 03/09/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:11:00 -0000 At 07:43 AM 3/10/2008, Robert Huff wrote: >Xihong Yin writes: > > > My FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time. How should I fix > > it? > > I'm having the same problem with -CURRENT. I have updated the >zoneinfo files (using misc/zoneinfo) and (re-)run tzsetup, but am >still a hour behind. > > > Robert Huff Are you running ntpd? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:17:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93BE106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24A18FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 10:17:48 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JTX24355; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:17:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 09:16:40 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:17:51 -0400 To: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:17:52 -0000 Derek Ragona writes: > > > My FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time. How should I fix > > > it? > > > > I'm having the same problem with -CURRENT. I have updated the > >zoneinfo files (using misc/zoneinfo) and (re-)run tzsetup, but am > >still a hour behind. > > > > > > Robert Huff > > Are you running ntpd? I am. (If it matters, I have rebooted the system since updating the tz files/settings.) Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:28:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CF51065670 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D838FC1D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AERped075033; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:27:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:29:40 -0500 To: Robert Huff From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 03/09/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:28:24 -0000 At 08:17 AM 3/10/2008, Robert Huff wrote: >Derek Ragona writes: > > > > > My FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time. How should > I fix > > > > it? > > > > > > I'm having the same problem with -CURRENT. I have updated the > > >zoneinfo files (using misc/zoneinfo) and (re-)run tzsetup, but am > > >still a hour behind. > > > > > > > > > Robert Huff > > > > Are you running ntpd? > > I am. > (If it matters, I have rebooted the system since updating the >tz files/settings.) > > > Robert Huff Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too large, and you have to stop nrpd and run ntpdate instead, then start ntpd. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:38:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356D81065675 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:38:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7248FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1654472fgg.35 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=3jmt4nka+howeh5VF56UdF7bADI6BhiH63+w0Q/inVs=; b=Vp7eJcEETOap9AgDqYDYZWtoEeZ3CZCkGxZeGUGFhR2QYCjLLnY+hBDTSZpf2M5ZUyWfHnm4NIl3OJW0uiz3I2ETz0S8QP+iwpOQw6UYY/9r2ipuKqwobP23PJmNtVLEGIcv4WWYNwR5UM9ryqTr/63xpjPchzJDf4y5e2zOvPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=QoOSP+2JGTaiUVct/9MBatjFUV/S9oYrxk/mDfRkS3emGzrUSPtG6rYbsde4HkXs22hBJt751NQLNQ5UMJviqMaHBjXVj7mpuwQWR/w/xImxeaS5Y2jMgTXH7RXTXL/btdqG3BuWrjJjrirJuhdS9ZHKNQvBMuXnESAw7Yyeh7Y= Received: by 10.82.146.10 with SMTP id t10mr13321614bud.6.1205159897218; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:38:17 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: b173146507f873a3 Subject: portupgrade can't fetch packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:38:19 -0000 Hi all, Earlier today I ran "portupgrade -aP" to update my system. Alas, everytime it tried to download a package, it failed and resorted to downloading and compiling the source. For example: [...] ---> Checking for the latest package of 'lang/python25' ---> Fetching the package(s) for 'python25-2.5.2_1' (lang/python25) ---> Fetching python25-2.5.2_1 fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/python25-2.5.2_1.tbz: Can't open data connection ** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1 ** Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/python25-2.5.2_1.tbz fetch: ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/python25-2.5.2_1.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) ** The command returned a non-zero exit status: 1 ** Failed to fetch ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/python25-2.5.2_1.tgz ** Failed to fetch python25-2.5.2_1 ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! python25-2.5.2_1 (fetch error) ** Could not find the latest version (2.5.2_1) ---> Using the port instead of a package [...] However, I could copy and paste the given URL, , into another terminal window and download it manually with wget, ftp, fetch, and/or curl (I tested them all). What could be preventing portupgrade from being able to download the packages itself? Thanks. $ uname -r 7.0-STABLE -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:38:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C331065678 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057648FC2B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 10:38:50 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JTX35887; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 09:37:40 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18389.18414.669287.817617@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:38:38 -0400 To: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:38:51 -0000 Derek Ragona writes: > Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is > running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too > large, and you have to stop ntpd and run ntpdate instead, then > start ntpd. I genuflect in your direction, sir. That did it. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:41:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103D81065674 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91DA8FC22 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:41:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AEfOfO075445; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:41:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310094253.02452a08@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:43:13 -0500 To: Robert Huff From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <18389.18414.669287.817617@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.18414.669287.817617@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 03/09/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:41:49 -0000 At 09:38 AM 3/10/2008, Robert Huff wrote: >Derek Ragona writes: > > > Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is > > running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too > > large, and you have to stop ntpd and run ntpdate instead, then > > start ntpd. > > I genuflect in your direction, sir. That did it. > > > Robert Huff Glad I could help. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 14:51:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B41B106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96DC8FC16 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:51:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from njm@njm.f2s.com) X-Trace: 23710573/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$ACCEPTED/freedom2Surf-customers/195.137.21.170 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 195.137.21.170 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: njm@njm.f2s.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcEALrk1EfDiRWq/2dsb2JhbACBVqdu X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from i-195-137-21-170.freedom2surf.net (HELO oberon.njm.f2s.com) ([195.137.21.170]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 10 Mar 2008 14:37:41 +0000 Received: from oberon.njm.f2s.com (localhost.njm.f2s.com [127.0.0.1]) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2AEbUmk049178; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:37:30 GMT (envelope-from njm@oberon.njm.f2s.com) Received: (from njm@localhost) by oberon.njm.f2s.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2AEbUhL049177; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:37:30 GMT (envelope-from njm) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:37:30 +0000 From: "N.J. Mann" To: Derek Ragona Message-ID: <20080310143730.GB45023@oberon.njm.f2s.com> Mail-Followup-To: Derek Ragona , Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17cvs (2008-02-27) Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:51:16 -0000 In message <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com>, Derek Ragona (derek@computinginnovations.com) wrote: > At 08:17 AM 3/10/2008, Robert Huff wrote: >> Derek Ragona writes: >> >> > > > My FreeBSD 6.2 doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time. How >> should I fix >> > > > it? >> > > >> > > I'm having the same problem with -CURRENT. I have updated the >> > >zoneinfo files (using misc/zoneinfo) and (re-)run tzsetup, but am >> > >still a hour behind. >> > >> > Are you running ntpd? >> >> I am. >> (If it matters, I have rebooted the system since updating the >> tz files/settings.) >> > Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is > running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too large, and > you have to stop nrpd and run ntpdate instead, then start ntpd. If you have securelevel greater than 1 the kernel prevent large time changes. See man init(8). Cheers, Nick. -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:28:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2886C106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB3D8FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 11:28:17 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OMO80034; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:28:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 10:27:15 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18389.21389.893977.421468@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:28:13 -0400 To: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310094253.02452a08@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.18414.669287.817617@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310094253.02452a08@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:28:18 -0000 Derek Ragona writes: > > > Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is > > > running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too > > > large, and you have to stop ntpd and run ntpdate instead, then > > > start ntpd. > > > > I genuflect in your direction, sir. That did it. > > Glad I could help. However, now I'm curious - isn't this going to be a recurring problem (admittedly only twice a year) for the non-trivial number of machines that do run ntpd for various reasons? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:36:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF54C106567B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6897B8FC1C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AFZmri076422; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:35:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080310103455.024d3c18@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:37:36 -0500 To: Robert Huff From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <18389.21389.893977.421468@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.18414.669287.817617@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310094253.02452a08@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.21389.893977.421468@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080309-0, 03/09/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Robert Huff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:36:17 -0000 At 10:28 AM 3/10/2008, Robert Huff wrote: >Derek Ragona writes: > > > > > > Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is > > > > running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too > > > > large, and you have to stop ntpd and run ntpdate instead, then > > > > start ntpd. > > > > > > I genuflect in your direction, sir. That did it. > > > > Glad I could help. > > However, now I'm curious - isn't this going to be a recurring >problem (admittedly only twice a year) for the non-trivial number of >machines that do run ntpd for various reasons? > > > Robert Huff Shouldn't be a recurring problem but it can depend on what version of FreeBSD you are running. I've had no problem with 6.X and 7.X updating automatically this weekend. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:40:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B651065674 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363128FC22 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:58672 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JYk7P-0007sW-3e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:40:51 +0100 Received: (qmail 2604 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2008 16:40:48 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 16:40:48 +0100 Received: (qmail 40929 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Mar 2008 16:40:48 +0100 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:40:48 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20080310154048.GA40842@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Huff , Derek Ragona , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Xihong Yin References: <20080309155724.U988@qryy.zlubzr.jrfgryy.pbz> <18389.11533.698402.135680@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310090343.024be350@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.13567.233607.687102@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310092732.024d7678@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.18414.669287.817617@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080310094253.02452a08@mail.computinginnovations.com> <18389.21389.893977.421468@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18389.21389.893977.421468@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JYk7P-0007sW-3e. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JYk7P-0007sW-3e 162b498545bd31fe4e527d5e007346cc Cc: Xihong Yin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: doesn't change to Daylight Saving Time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:40:52 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:28:13AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > Derek Ragona writes: > > > > > > Have you checked the ntpd log file for errors, and verified it is > > > > running. Often ntpd won't reset the time if the delta is too > > > > large, and you have to stop ntpd and run ntpdate instead, then > > > > start ntpd. > > > > > > I genuflect in your direction, sir. That did it. > > > > Glad I could help. > > However, now I'm curious - isn't this going to be a recurring > problem (admittedly only twice a year) for the non-trivial number of > machines that do run ntpd for various reasons? I suspect that it is only a problem for those whose machines are a) Having the CMOS clock set to local time (instead of UTC) and b) Having their computers turned off when the switch to/from DST is being made - thus preventing adjkerntz(8) from adjusting the CMOS clock appropriately. Running ntpd(8) will by itself not cause any problems - but in the above scenario it will not adjust the time to be correct either - the jump will be too large. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:42:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBEF8106567D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B5C8FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C03B3F6181 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:42:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E163F617C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:42:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D55722.1060905@laposte.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:43:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080305 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: GEOM label of a read-only partition is not properly handled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:42:32 -0000 Hi, I have an UFS partition mounted read-only. There is a label on it, and it appears twice under dev: as ad10s1h and as ufs/LIBRARY. Unlike RW-mounted filesystems, the entry under ufs is not deleted after mounting (either using /dev/ad10s1h or /dev/ufs/LIBRARY as special argument of mount). Was this behavior remarked by others? I have not found a PR about this, I maybe should do this, right? Cheers -- Michal $ uname -a FreeBSD Llea.celt.neu 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #11: Wed Mar 5 00:59:32 CET 2008 root@Llea:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LLEA amd64 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:45:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C569C1065678 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:45:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A278FC2A for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:45:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AFiqGH005688; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:44:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2AFikEY005684; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:44:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:44:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Mario Lobo In-Reply-To: <200803101001.58362.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> Message-ID: <20080310164418.D5681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200803101001.58362.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT?] tcpdump overhead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:45:27 -0000 > > I am writing a final paper for a PG course and I need to take precise > measurements on network performance. I gonna be doing lots of packet dumps > and I would like to know you guys' opinion on how much of tcpdump overhead > (if meaningful for these measurements) I should take into account. > > If there are any readings on the subject you could point me to... no idea but small for sure. it would rather cause tcpdump to not catch all packets that network performance drop. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:46:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2669D106567C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4145E8FC5D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:46:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AFk1Sx005705; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:46:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2AFjt6f005702; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:45:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:45:55 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Mike Clarke In-Reply-To: <200803101026.01220.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> Message-ID: <20080310164516.C5681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <6293ba970803091028v51449aeax32cbd14617cc4967@mail.gmail.com> <20080309191627.J1605@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200803101026.01220.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdrecord, CD-R error messages with 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:46:21 -0000 > DFLTPHYS(65536) > cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 251904 bytes, which is greater than > DFLTPHYS(65536) > > followed by lots more cam_periph_mapmem warnings. > > Desoite all this the CD verifies OK - should I worry? no :) but it is strange anyway. i use cdrecord sometimes and get no errors. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 15:59:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA3D1065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536E68FC1B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:59:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AFxRi9005790; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:59:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2AFxNXH005787; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:59:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:59:23 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= In-Reply-To: <47D55722.1060905@laposte.net> Message-ID: <20080310165854.G5727@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47D55722.1060905@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM label of a read-only partition is not properly handled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:59:52 -0000 > /dev/ad10s1h or /dev/ufs/LIBRARY as special argument of mount). > > Was this behavior remarked by others? I have not found a PR about this, I > maybe should do this, right? this is right behaviour. you may use the device many times if read-only, but not read-write. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 16:30:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2617D1065673 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8138FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C563A3F618C; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:30:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6953F6149; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:30:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D56274.6020506@laposte.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:31:48 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080305 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <47D55722.1060905@laposte.net> <20080310165854.G5727@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080310165854.G5727@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM label of a read-only partition is not properly handled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:30:56 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> /dev/ad10s1h or /dev/ufs/LIBRARY as special argument of mount). >> >> Was this behavior remarked by others? I have not found a PR about >> this, I maybe should do this, right? > > this is right behaviour. you may use the device many times if read-only, > but not read-write. Fine, thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 16:34:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B515B106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235E8FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=kestrel.milibyte.co.uk) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JYkxP-00030H-BT; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:35 +0000 Received: by kestrel.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JYkxK-000Mny-TO; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:31 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:29 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <6293ba970803091028v51449aeax32cbd14617cc4967@mail.gmail.com> <200803101026.01220.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> <20080310164516.C5681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080310164516.C5681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803101634.30532.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on kestrel.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: ce074f11f50d229ac2086ce350f5e839 Subject: Re: cdrecord, CD-R error messages with 7.0-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:34:40 -0000 On Monday 10 March 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > DFLTPHYS(65536) > > cam_periph_mapmem: attempt to map 251904 bytes, which is greater than > > DFLTPHYS(65536) > > > > followed by lots more cam_periph_mapmem warnings. > > > > Desoite all this the CD verifies OK - should I worry? > > no :) > > but it is strange anyway. i use cdrecord sometimes and get no errors. I wonder if it's a hardware related issue with that particular drive. I think I might have a Mitsumi CD writer I could install as a temporary test in place of the Pioneer. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 17:08:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD93E106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@splitstreams.com) Received: from mailer.splitstreams.com (mailer.splitstreams.com [208.42.101.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788888FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@splitstreams.com) Received: from mail.splitstreams.com (mail.splitstreams.com [10.0.0.25]) by mailer.splitstreams.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453DD22827 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:08:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [209.180.20.178] (monkey.oss.uswest.net [209.180.20.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jay@splitstreams.com) by mail.splitstreams.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22254AC55 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:08:27 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <47D56B0A.1070209@splitstreams.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:08:26 -0500 From: Jay Deiman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47C8AB02.3000305@splitstreams.com> <47D2ED98.5090406@crackmonkey.us> <08f801c88158$913c9170$b3b5b450$@Org> <47D2F6CC.3080800@crackmonkey.us> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on postfix.splitstreams.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Upgrading from 6.2 to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:08:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 08/03/2008, Adam J Richardson wrote: >> The-IRC Hosting Administration Team wrote: >> > There is nothing wrong with obtaining the source code of 7.X and doing a >> > full recompile to upgrade your version sanely. >> >> >> Ah, really? Good news. I heard somewhere there were problems upgrading >> like that across a major version boundary. Or was it to a BETA? That >> might have been it. > > AFIK, that was 4.x -> 5/6 > OR > Ports, which are bound to be a problem across > major versions.* > Also, 8.x has a recent change which prevents > easy upgrading from early versions of 5/6(/7?). > > In any case, I had no problems upgrading to 7 via > normal methods as outlined in /usr/src/UPDATING > for two machines running 6.x Well, I'm going to give this a try on a machine today. Thanks for all the input everyone. > > > > * literally everything explodes and your fish dies. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH1WsKQ0lr+ZVKSBgRAmuvAKCRZRx9+L0XUHGS5jzkthuwv09d8QCggBo3 xmSEd4j08pL/Y/PzcRfaVcU= =+S0d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 17:33:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CED91065684 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D74C8FC28 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mario.lobo@ipad.com.br) Received: (qmail 60975 invoked by uid 79); 10 Mar 2008 17:33:12 -0000 Received: from 192.168.64.1 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/6188. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:1(192.168.64.1):. Processed in 0.022185 secs); 10 Mar 2008 17:33:12 -0000 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mario.lobo@ipad.com.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(192.168.64.1):. Processed in 0.022185 secs Process 60967) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo.ipad.com.br) (mario.lobo@ipad.com.br@192.168.64.1) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 17:33:12 -0000 From: Mario Lobo Organization: IPAD To: Wojciech Puchar Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:33:17 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200803101001.58362.mario.lobo@ipad.com.br> <20080310164418.D5681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080310164418.D5681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Face: ,55PTLsK{\?org*WH[[%>IJpi}pb?lwVxsDL<:}(Ti2yN(w/k\"enXx"?CbN[hp Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT?] tcpdump overhead X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:33:17 -0000 On Monday 10 March 2008, you wrote: > > I am writing a final paper for a PG course and I need to take precise > > measurements on network performance. I gonna be doing lots of packet > > dumps and I would like to know you guys' opinion on how much of tcpdump > > overhead (if meaningful for these measurements) I should take into > > account. > > > > If there are any readings on the subject you could point me to... > > no idea but small for sure. it would rather cause tcpdump to not catch all > packets that network performance drop. Thanks for the reply Wojciech. =46orgive my english but I couldn't quite get what you meant by: "it would rather cause tcpdump to not catch all packets that network=20 performance drop." Could you rephrase that for me please ? Thanks =2D-=20 Mario Lobo Seguran=E7a de Redes - Desenvolvimento e An=E1lise IPAD - Instituto de Pesquisa e Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Tecnol=F3gico e=20 Cient=EDfico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 17:39:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D25B106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9F48FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.72.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAE3405BE4; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:39:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D57251.8080805@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:39:29 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080303) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "E. J. Cerejo" References: <47D47CFD.7000001@palaceofretention.ca> <20080309225258.22232a58.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47D4AFD6.5020401@palaceofretention.ca> <20080310000046.6b0d9bc0.ejcerejo@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <20080310000046.6b0d9bc0.ejcerejo@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions , Vinny Subject: Re: How did references to libc.so.7 get in my 6.3 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:39:35 -0000 E. J. Cerejo wrote: > Then you're running FreeBSD 6.x and you updated your ports tree after FreeBSD 7.0 release. The latest ports tree no longer supports 6.x I believe. So you should upgrade to 7 release or stable. You made my day. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 17:44:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C24F106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snow.mountains.4@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5879B8FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snow.mountains.4@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so1956216wfa.7 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:44:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=3y+fSHA5yGpA4NxTLopByoufndTVibEzI9uE++l/8Qs=; b=DD1UBWDbqZltRwFlUIhR4/Tl2SHJkCxdEkI2olcBAxzv6EPZre+GuAVGW6ryZY/8UHUIfKDAWgbo7b3C0pCtlwOsotBWW8Y0KmOc8Hvw1ELrCFm+h0xVi6FEo5VtxBcz9EuPD4cI0Z90tI8gUOeUy+T6CkgffHoSsrDbG7hDrTo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=luowWoogjCVrjhtU5RNtyz7BStsY4R61Xah9EoWlc7o8DNHmCl7SsS86yWBcxVMX/6EXQNnHst8nfAEj7WU898dEl/kTRDJB/w4kG0peFXWlOLoHnymB+jlniifbaLCDTf2wD7vpBNt4PIL2D8HlkOdHQnNrcdppG/YBTIvl2p0= Received: by 10.142.131.18 with SMTP id e18mr1955581wfd.147.1205169519323; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:18:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3cf9f8920803101018i573a5c26l986b9508495fcd5a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:18:39 +0100 From: "Snow Mountains" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: no ad1s3a,b,d... on ad1s3 after bsdlabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:44:14 -0000 Hi I try to understand bsdlabel. I have former fat slice (ad1s3) on my disk and I want to make several BSD partitions on it. I did this: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1s3 bs=1k count=1024 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1048576 bytes transferred in 0.318986 secs (3287217 bytes/sec) # bsdlabel -w ad1s3 # bsdlabel -e ad1s3 (edit) # bsdlabel ad1s3 # /dev/ad1s3: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 10000000 16 4.2BSD 0 0 0 b: 10000000 10000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 c: 47616660 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 27616644 20000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # newfs -U /dev/ad1s3a newfs: /dev/ad1s3a: could not find special device # ls /dev/ad1s3* /dev/ad1s3 # What I miss because I don't have ad1s3a,b,d? If repeat same procedure on disk (big file) mounted as /dev/md0, a see /dev/md0,a,b,d,e... after this group of commands. thanks SergiM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 18:20:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2805106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1E28FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC8E1CCAC; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:20:34 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:20:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47D49A0C.4090801@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: <47D49A0C.4090801@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803101920.32918.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Chris Maness Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:20:36 -0000 On Monday 10 March 2008 03:16:44 Chris Maness wrote: > OK, after I was able to get apache to load without crashing, none of my > php aps worked correctly. I suppose this had to do with me deleting > > extensions.ini and only rebuilding php5 and not its dependencies. Well, > after rebuilding all of the deps, I now have a extensions.ini file again. > I tried re-arranging as suggested in the archive, but this did not solve > the problem. I am only having this issue on my 7.0-R box. 6.3-R seems to > be working ok, but I haven't been fooling with it. I am having the issue > on my test box. Hmm, "worked correctly" is about as broad as "slow internet". Can you be sure the errors are related? First try to make sure, the core dump is gone (php -v shouldn't coredump), then resolve the errors in your apps. They might be caused by different issues, like you're missing a module, paths changed, dunno. Will have to see the errors :) -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 18:26:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8224106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774C08FC1C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4172B1CCAC; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:26:11 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:26:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D46A4B.6050409@mkdev.eu> <200803100019.33200.danny@ricin.com> In-Reply-To: <200803100019.33200.danny@ricin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803101926.10043.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Danny Pansters Subject: Re: tar( bzip2 parts of manpage ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:26:12 -0000 On Monday 10 March 2008 00:19:33 Danny Pansters wrote: > Note that both > bsdtar and bzip2 are in base and have been for a while so it seems like a > logical feature for bsdtar. Knowing whether its a gzip or bzip2 compressed > is easy to see from magic numbers. And done by the fabolous base library: libarchive(3). -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 18:33:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37208106567C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE038FC26 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AIXUl6028262; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:33:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 52DACB82A; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:33:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:33:30 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Ivailo Bonev Message-ID: <20080310183330.GA50364@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Ivailo Bonev , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail server from Windows to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:33:33 -0000 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:22:39PM +0200, Ivailo Bonev wrote: > I have a Windows machine that get all e-mails, from few accounts, from=20 > different Internet providers. I want to setup FreeBSD machine that get al= l=20 > mails from accounts and remote and local users get their mails from that= =20 > FreeBSD mail storage server. I don't own a domain or MX records. Ok. > I read many docs in Intrernet, and now I have installed FreeBSD 7.0=20 > RELEASE, with installed fetchmail port (to get mail from various accounts= ),=20 Fetchmail is the right tool for the job. > sendmail-sasl port, and dovecot for IMAP server. But now I'm lost, from= =20 > where to start configuring FreeBSD mail server? IMHO postfix is easier to set up than sendmail, but the principles are the same. I would make users on the FreeBSD machine for everyone that needs to download mail from the machine. Use a non-existent home-directory and /usr/bin/nologin as the shell for these accounts. Use the virtual hosts feature to deliver mail for different addresses to local users. See e.g. http://mathforum.org/~sasha/tech/sendmailvhosts.html I haven't used dovecot, so I can't help you much with that. If your FreeBSD server and the windows clients are on a trusted private subnet, I would probably just use plain text authentication. > And one last thing, how can deliver all mail messages from Outlook Expres= s=20 > client from Windows machine to FreeBSD mail server machine? You can set the FreeBSD machine as the outgoing mail server in Outlook. But this might not work, depending on your set-up. If you relay the mail to your ISP's mailserver, it probably won't handle incoming mail from addresses outside his domain. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfVfvoACgkQEnfvsMMhpyU1uQCggjQkcD9ow3cl2jMrVrkEaRts ZLoAnR9Bx+LzmH0/YcBBFY0y16WcyDrM =mIlz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 18:42:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DDC106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@zeus.utelcom.ru) Received: from zeus.utelcom.ru (zeus.utelcom.ru [195.209.228.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8820F8FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@zeus.utelcom.ru) Received: from zeus.utelcom.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.utelcom.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AAPYHS076988 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:25:35 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from www@zeus.utelcom.ru) Received: (from www@localhost) by zeus.utelcom.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m2AAPXO6076987; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:25:33 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from www) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:25:33 +0300 (MSK) Message-Id: <200803101025.m2AAPXO6076987@zeus.utelcom.ru> To: questions@freebsd.org X-PHP-Script: snopsy.spb.ru/cache/ini.php for 212.100.71.49, 212.100.250.217 From: James Adamati MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: From James Adamati X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jamesadamati8@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:42:52 -0000 Hi, How are you doing today? My name is James Adamati I live in London and work in a financial institution here in United Kingdom. There is a potential transaction relating to a dormant account of one of our deceased customers, which I would like us to handle the fund actualization together. Secondly, I hope to relocate and acquire a home for my family with a view to establishing over there. I will be needing your assistance and co-operation in this endeavor. Let me know if I can trust you with the above and more information will be sent to you as quickly as possible.For further details,please contact me through my private email- Respectfully, James Adamati From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 19:39:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990361065677 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC9F8FC26 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j2so892122tid.3 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.203.8 with SMTP id a8mr2993911ybg.125.1205177959346; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm13793644aga.18.2008.03.10.12.39.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:39:01 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080310153901.6836e824@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080310183330.GA50364@slackbox.xs4all.nl> References: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> <20080310183330.GA50364@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD-6.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/WfatAriQKS2a+JaKkDlgvtf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: mail server from Windows to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:39:23 -0000 --Sig_/WfatAriQKS2a+JaKkDlgvtf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:33:30 +0100 Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:22:39PM +0200, Ivailo Bonev wrote: > > I have a Windows machine that get all e-mails, from few accounts, > > from different Internet providers. I want to setup FreeBSD machine > > that get all mails from accounts and remote and local users get > > their mails from that FreeBSD mail storage server. I don't own a > > domain or MX records. >=20 > Ok. >=20 > > I read many docs in Intrernet, and now I have installed FreeBSD 7.0=20 > > RELEASE, with installed fetchmail port (to get mail from various > > accounts),=20 >=20 > Fetchmail is the right tool for the job. >=20 > > sendmail-sasl port, and dovecot for IMAP server. But now I'm lost, > > from where to start configuring FreeBSD mail server? >=20 > IMHO postfix is easier to set up than sendmail, but the principles are > the same. >=20 > I would make users on the FreeBSD machine for everyone that needs to > download mail from the machine. Use a non-existent home-directory and > /usr/bin/nologin as the shell for these accounts. >=20 > Use the virtual hosts feature to deliver mail for different addresses > to local users. See e.g. > http://mathforum.org/~sasha/tech/sendmailvhosts.html Use 'virtual' for all users, local or not if Postfix is employed. It makes setting up the system a whole lot easier and potentially more secure. =20 > I haven't used dovecot, so I can't help you much with that. If your > FreeBSD server and the windows clients are on a trusted private > subnet, I would probably just use plain text authentication. Setting up SSL/TLS on Postfix is really trivial. I use it myself. Again, it increases the security factor. > > And one last thing, how can deliver all mail messages from Outlook > > Express client from Windows machine to FreeBSD mail server machine? >=20 > You can set the FreeBSD machine as the outgoing mail server in > Outlook. But this might not work, depending on your set-up. If you > relay the mail to your ISP's mailserver, it probably won't handle > incoming mail from addresses outside his domain. Unless there is some weird firewall, I don't see what the problem would be. =20 > Roland --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Falling in love makes smoking pot all day look like the ultimate in restraint. Dave Sim, author of "Cerebus" --Sig_/WfatAriQKS2a+JaKkDlgvtf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfVjl0ACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMmbTQCgxV/mmjcYgK2s4ENn6LWM0vXP P5IAoMA1Nzsq7THHHBWXzPnmQd3KR8gH =/j+D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/WfatAriQKS2a+JaKkDlgvtf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 20:38:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB361065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.39.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 503EC8FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 20781 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Mar 2008 20:11:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=wcZijfitG0GVjmOEn5gNktRzYn5+uyCHv4JKoqdw4vdmTuQNJhQb949M/ybYEZD2aW+ETQvxdJWMzy5EDMtWb8C3QtvlDMSRU1Ea5XqsPrX0clGxZdRTav7zR7HjJTbYaUIerOedwVQCtttEUsPlso9ac74UwmqVFJHFi8b8ZAA=; X-YMail-OSG: DqvD98IVM1nF1iWxFO4FCr3QBZ4v1e0u99o86.ZrOU92eoMfjsyJFr5P73O.MT.VsDRZZl87Ra0uys7d3vhsTxy7_ybFiCbYt11Crf4Z7PbG97TOIJVXrN0EiqFnXQ-- Received: from [78.27.38.46] by web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:11:21 PDT Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:11:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <726997.20669.qm@web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: error when upgrading gnome-panel on FreeBSD 6.2 (AMD64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:38:02 -0000 Hi folks, I'm updating my ports and ran across this error message when I update my freebsd 6.2 amd64 system. When upgrading gnome-panel I get the following error: Making install in gnome-panel gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' gmake install-am gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' test -z "/usr/local/bin" || /usr/local/bin/gmkdir -p "/usr/local/bin" /bin/sh /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-libtool --mode=install install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 'gnome-panel' '/usr/local/bin/gnome-panel' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 -s gnome-panel /usr/local/bin/gnome-panel /bin/sh /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-libtool --mode=install install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 'gnome-desktop-item-edit' '/usr/local/bin/gnome-desktop-item-edit' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 -s gnome-desktop-item-edit /usr/local/bin/gnome-desktop-item-edit if test -z "" ; then \ for p in panel-compatibility.schemas panel-global.schemas panel-general.schemas panel-toplevel.schemas panel-object.schemas ; do \ GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml:merged:/usr/local/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults /usr/local/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule ../gnome-panel/$p ; \ done ; \ /usr/local/bin/gconftool-2 --direct --config-source=xml:merged:/usr/local/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults --load ./panel-default-setup.entries ; \ /usr/local/bin/gconftool-2 --direct --config-source=xml:merged:/usr/local/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults --load ./panel-default-setup.entries /apps/panel ; \ fi /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" gmake[3]: *** [install-data-local] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' gmake[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' gmake[1]: *** [install] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel. *** Error code 1 What is happening here? What can I do to solve this? --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 20:12:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5476C106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gligor_lucian@yahoo.com) Received: from n54.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n54.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [98.136.44.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F1038FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gligor_lucian@yahoo.com) Received: from [216.252.122.217] by n54.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Mar 2008 19:59:38 -0000 Received: from [69.147.65.154] by t2.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Mar 2008 19:59:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp402.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Mar 2008 19:59:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 614747.85346.bm@omp402.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 75343 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Mar 2008 19:59:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=aMDZtbNIexChR4VqO7HrOK+v9jl0un7lVuBwy2drhI6Ic/InmaUTLQ2mG8MkDh39/NjUKtS+jaZxzSYvdDfxWyaj3bIkMdxZbLWmMAOFF6rzq7xo+vmqOK+zInECLlDjbnMDxYkLNmz09/HvVMAAvpDxPG2nxI5iD4aBnoHbDJQ=; X-YMail-OSG: J4FHF_EVM1mMRkCYzv6J03.mW0up55W5.7KyMxQI Received: from [78.96.92.233] by web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:59:38 PDT Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:59:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Gligor Lucian To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:38:08 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:12:24 -0000 Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 20:46:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533891065670; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao101.cox.net (eastrmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.240.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C148FC14; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080310204655.FQM22791.eastrmmtao101.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:46:55 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id zYmU1Y0054iy4EG02YmUQc; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:46:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:48:28 -0500 To: "Dino Vliet" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <726997.20669.qm@web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <726997.20669.qm@web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.26 (Linux) Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error when upgrading gnome-panel on FreeBSD 6.2 (AMD64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:46:56 -0000 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:11:21 -0500, Dino Vliet = wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm updating my ports and ran across this error message when I update = = > my freebsd 6.2 amd64 system. > > When upgrading gnome-panel I get the following error: > > Making install in gnome-panel > gmake[1]: Entering directory = > `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' > gmake install-am > gmake[2]: Entering directory = > `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' > gmake[3]: Entering directory = > `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' > test -z "/usr/local/bin" || /usr/local/bin/gmkdir -p "/usr/local/bin"= > /bin/sh /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-libtool --mode=3Dinst= all = > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 'gnome-panel' = > '/usr/local/bin/gnome-panel' > install -o root -g wheel -m 555 -s gnome-panel = > /usr/local/bin/gnome-panel > /bin/sh /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-libtool --mode=3Dinst= all = > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 'gnome-desktop-item-edit' = > '/usr/local/bin/gnome-desktop-item-edit' > install -o root -g wheel -m 555 -s gnome-desktop-item-edit = > /usr/local/bin/gnome-desktop-item-edit > if test -z "" ; then \ > for p in panel-compatibility.schemas = > panel-global.schemas panel-general.schemas panel-toplevel.schemas = > panel-object.schemas ; do \ > GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=3Dxml:merged:/usr/local/etc/g= conf/gconf.xml.defaults = > /usr/local/bin/gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule ../gnome-panel/$p ;= \ > done ; \ > /usr/local/bin/gconftool-2 --direct = > --config-source=3Dxml:merged:/usr/local/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults = > --load ./panel-default-setup.entries ; \ > /usr/local/bin/gconftool-2 --direct = > --config-source=3Dxml:merged:/usr/local/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults = > --load ./panel-default-setup.entries /apps/panel ; \ > fi > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, = > required by "gconftool-2" > gmake[3]: *** [install-data-local] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory = > `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' > gmake[2]: *** [install-am] Error 2 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory = > `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' > gmake[1]: *** [install] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory = > `/usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel/work/gnome-panel-2.20.3/gnome-panel' > gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > *** Error code 2 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel. > *** Error code 1 > > What is happening here? Sometime ago, maintainer has updated icu and the library version has bee= n = bumped. He has refused to add in /usr/ports/UPDATING. > What can I do to solve this? You have to reinstall all ports that depend on icu by use portupgrade or= = portmaster. # portupgrade -rf icu\* or # portmaster -r icu\* Cheers, Mezz -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 20:47:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83E910656C7 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kent@khauser.net) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598848FC22 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kent@khauser.net) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e11so1467818rng.7 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.73.1 with SMTP id v1mr3949569waa.16.1205180529923; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.15.6 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6004effe0803101322h3501ec70pee102901eefebfc2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:22:09 -1000 From: "Kent Hauser" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: SATA Tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:07 -0000 Hi, I need to replace a failed DAT72 drive. My current one is SCSI, but I'd like to use a SATA replacement. Will this work? Thanks. Kent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 20:47:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2C01065683 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C00F8FC29 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1041051ele.12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:47:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=+LlBQLRiZBgoeBrjocl/nRi0OKrdLqN0q/ER5v04Dd0=; b=nfqibnkJU+IlPE8WyQAkaR1YtSi8Yqp0pMgwsh5hHy1uzIc/jzbUg0+7+CsPoKHf6cLghbR+WB8Cdvpc4hjKRgP67Kvel1yC/bW04ZltATvvcmKSyWl3dQmS01QfXZNKdvnLt5kMjhBClzg66UXreQrVTweAdnvKvAmvfdYf8Ec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c6w7efALGYzrEGUz8mx2Hhzzmjyp5dEd2yeovux3lck/dN4O97unhtkYRExheLahSJ+0dQRctXoE9SaRJpeYFbJZAye26/MGTS6L3sqDnJFOVt6rCViv09MoVM6omTOT29UdGqk0hvZmAG5DHESf5TTlilREnhIE454n3fuy+IE= Received: by 10.140.208.14 with SMTP id f14mr3536541rvg.283.1205182052298; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.170.5 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:47:32 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Dino Vliet" In-Reply-To: <726997.20669.qm@web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <726997.20669.qm@web51110.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error when upgrading gnome-panel on FreeBSD 6.2 (AMD64) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:47:34 -0000 On 10/03/2008, Dino Vliet wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm updating my ports and ran across this error message when I update my freebsd 6.2 amd64 system. > > When upgrading gnome-panel I get the following error: . . . > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.36" not found, required by "gconftool-2" . . . > What is happening here? What can I do to solve this? > You upgraded icu at some point past, but did not upgrade some of the things that depend on icu which gnome-panel depend upon. I would advise that you issue: # portupgrade -fr icu* although that will rebuild quite a bit. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 20:54:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161C3106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [207.115.11.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E414A8FC3B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with ESMTP id <20080310204124H0400a7e1le>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:41:25 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D59CE5.5060401@datapipe.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:41:09 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gligor Lucian References: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:54:45 -0000 Gligor Lucian wrote: > Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? > > > > --------------------------------- > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Yes, usb printers are attached as normal in FreeBSD. It's up to you to provide the necessary utilities for speaking to it. CUPS for instance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:00:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910001065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dduong@goldenmunky.org) Received: from goldenmunky.org (206-248-139-62.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAEB8FC1E for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dduong@goldenmunky.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by goldenmunky.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46742202231; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:42:54 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mercury.goldenmunky.org X-Spam-Score: -4.17 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.17 tagged_above=-1000 required=2 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.229, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from goldenmunky.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.goldenmunky.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7oUj10kXFrLb; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:42:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by goldenmunky.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E2E200C79; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:42:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47D59D47.1070403@goldenmunky.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:42:47 -0500 From: David Duong User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gligor Lucian References: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:00:49 -0000 Gligor Lucian wrote: > Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? > > > > --------------------------------- > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Should be able to: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/printing-intro-setup.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:01:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7B3106567A for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kent@khauser.net) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4688FC14 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kent@khauser.net) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so2036904wfa.7 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.240.9 with SMTP id n9mr2265147wfh.136.1205181395451; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.15.6 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:36:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6004effe0803101336u2453722fsa348f42bab002f80@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:36:35 -1000 From: "Kent Hauser" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: SATA Tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:01:41 -0000 Hi, I need to replace a failed DAT72 drive. My current one is SCSI, but I'd like to use a SATA replacement. Will this work? Thanks. Kent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:06:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51301065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4B08FC1C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2AL63jo007831; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m2AL63MJ007828; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:06:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.kq6up.org: chris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:06:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Maness X-X-Sender: chris@ns1.kq6up.org To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200803101920.32918.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Message-ID: <20080310135835.M6788@ns1.kq6up.org> References: <47D4641B.9080609@chrismaness.com> <200803092346.41551.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47D49A0C.4090801@chrismaness.com> <200803101920.32918.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:06:20 -0000 On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Mel wrote: > On Monday 10 March 2008 03:16:44 Chris Maness wrote: > >> OK, after I was able to get apache to load without crashing, none of my >> php aps worked correctly. I suppose this had to do with me deleting >> >> extensions.ini and only rebuilding php5 and not its dependencies. Well, >> after rebuilding all of the deps, I now have a extensions.ini file again. >> I tried re-arranging as suggested in the archive, but this did not solve >> the problem. I am only having this issue on my 7.0-R box. 6.3-R seems to >> be working ok, but I haven't been fooling with it. I am having the issue >> on my test box. > > Hmm, "worked correctly" is about as broad as "slow internet". Can you be sure > the errors are related? > First try to make sure, the core dump is gone (php -v shouldn't coredump), > then resolve the errors in your apps. They might be caused by different > issues, like you're missing a module, paths changed, dunno. Will have to see > the errors :) > > -- > Mel > > Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules > and never get to the software part. > The pages were not displaying correctly. The squirrelmail page came up blank. My joomla page complained of an internal error. I imagine this was do to the fact that I removed the extension.ini file completely, but when I rebuilt all of the modules for php, there was a new extension.ini file. It seems like the issue is related to the extension.ini file somehow, but rearranging the arguments haven no effect. Also, there are no log entries for apache when it dumps. It dies without any errors in the log. It is almost like it needs to be debugged with a non-stripped binary. However, I am not an apache developer, and would have no idea how to do this. Also, my configuration file and installation is default, so this should just work out of the box. Very frustrating. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:07:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711AB1065684 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc@default.co.yu) Received: from smtp1.default.co.yu (bv.default.co.yu [87.237.201.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1EDB8FC15 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc@default.co.yu) Received: (qmail 40543 invoked by uid 89); 10 Mar 2008 21:07:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.5.7.109?) (bc@default.co.yu@213.198.226.187) by smtp1.default.co.yu with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 21:07:13 -0000 Message-ID: <47D5A301.2080509@default.co.yu> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:07:13 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Qm9nZGFuIMSGdWxpYnJr?= Organization: Default Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freeBSD Mailing List References: <539c60b90803061528x3965e30dh2e93b18ca9e63d38@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90803061528x3965e30dh2e93b18ca9e63d38@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: kldload: exec format error on newly built GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:07:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Franks wrote: | I just added a device driver source file to the appropriate location | and rebuilt: | | dystant# cd /usr/src | dystant# make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC | ... | dystant# make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC | dystant# init 6 | ... | [steve@dystant /usr/home/steve]$ sudo kldload ucp | kldload: can't load ucp: Exec format error | | ??? What am I doing wrong? | You are using some 3rd party driver for freebsd. Just like you got new kernel, get new driver for it. wtf is ucp anyway? cba to check google :/ - -- Best regards, Bogdan Culibrk bc@default.co.yu http://default.co.yu/~bc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkfVowEACgkQo6C4vAhYtCAEYgCfXArpJL7ncCrDa2DcqCVdmiGt KD0An3RM+cmLore6XMxCrdsBytTTVMbX =x6yC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:14:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631181065671 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62AD8FC23 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 26890 invoked by uid 0); 10 Mar 2008 20:47:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp1.knology.net with SMTP; 10 Mar 2008 20:47:44 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id D046128440; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:47:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:47:43 -0500 From: David Kelly To: Gligor Lucian Message-ID: <20080310204743.GB81013@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <423536.74794.qm@web43131.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:25 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian wrote: > Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? Yes. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:15:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F24106567D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA90A8FC2E for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so2278741wxd.7 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.57.13 with SMTP id f13mr6258591wxa.84.1205183718023; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h17sm123787wxd.24.2008.03.10.14.14.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:14:31 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080310171431.5a2b8062@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD-6.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/qioisQ_JvKyoKZcV5kKT/0Y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Error message with hp-toolbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:15:19 -0000 --Sig_/qioisQ_JvKyoKZcV5kKT/0Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am getting an error message when using the hp-toolbox (print/hplip) version 2.7.12 on a FreeBSD-6.3 machine. When I start the program, this is displayed: Mar 10 16:49:57 scorpio python: hp-toolbox[35348]: error: Invalid locale: C.utf8 Next, when I click on the 'Send FAX' button, this is displayed: Mar 10 16:50:51 scorpio python: hp-fab[35369]: error: Invalid locale: C.utf8 Mar 10 16:51:10 scorpio python: hp-fab[35371]: error: Invalid locale: C.utf8 In any case, the message is faxed correctly, so I assume that the error message is really just a warning. Is there anything that I can do to correct this problem or should I just ignore it? Thanks! --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net I poured spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone. Steven Wright --Sig_/qioisQ_JvKyoKZcV5kKT/0Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfVpLgACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMlZFwCeLVcOmXAmwfHbM8x7Tl27kit8 y0MAoOEA5msJA7XXfOacc1MWjMlAydDm =ai5J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qioisQ_JvKyoKZcV5kKT/0Y-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:47:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527601065676 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hanson.alex@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35BC8FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hanson.alex@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2422492waf.3 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=KoCo7ltMgg8ogtDSOULYfzD1VWWh1A4OmEkRit2/ono=; b=RybTcvcRn3RtewgLAyNLczE7IsQpC+C71Re/Sj07dm+dZ6TBJ0td6wEbC7M+c6eYAUXdWAFJCQa1eK6399pO6onuPjav/nIRKcC2KZ55WR0DntAU5hRcIeag/AppsG+3gCqNYetbrz+EWYnClstgQ2rsy5QQwCfjoS5NDbjAiKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZZNIpR1XauEF+mDV6GonCiwcpdkozgSwFqk6Yj2zmk65109Mi3UKKDNvWJmr7QMSTmODKdkj7qkQiMWPe6bCaVHcqE6poVCzlbJaf+UMNIDsS52oy6JzCazDJm/5TN5lHxGR4TS7eou795ZrRyCCFIzoiIkhd+e0Q6hZGUpBiN8= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr3830921wal.98.1205183953012; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.74.10 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5cc715c00803101419n7531b40dmff3eab0e0c63dc7a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:19:12 -0700 From: "Alex Hanson" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:47:42 -0000 I was trying to install FreeBSD and kept getting an Umass error. The problem was that i had a thumb drive pluged in, you may want to put that in the manual From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:54:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F378C106566C for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9934A8FC18 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:54:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so2294728wxd.7 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:54:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=HDVb38wr4lgD/AK55XU22XsGVG6Y493UGy4QJO0kI24=; b=mK704R0ul1+C5I40CKnS/euNQaz3PqBe50Jym6IBhXJSTc1w3tVWnRdnHMrXvgsmXi42GLalUQ22Dw/SGyCDdxwsHgv+Ow3G4bpF4x/DkN1hbSwwXibLRpp0kzantDvsgBNps8KIYGyD+YhKffLYUAVRYwwup9tYusulP73h8eM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=VdjOGTUZQjzIa5QiOWtf/Q+5BtC+neRpbOT2HuoFbmWZn5sE/UK9NcH4rK2gioivVbfQ+fyp2zgcGIITHhgpZLGyvFQpMMjYQ1TtJkCnFXsph4NkXo6zvW7e49FbrSdTxoazNKeVtnnaXK8rWWomQvJMT8AtMmuny5rNjfY0brA= Received: by 10.78.136.9 with SMTP id j9mr15290879hud.78.1205186075864; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:54:35 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:54:39 -0000 Hello, I am using FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE-p1. What should I be diagnosing if I cannot use traceroute? Whatever domain I try to check, it always times out. The box is behind a hardware firewall. It also uses pf to some minor degree. However, pfctl -d does not allow me to traceroute either. $ traceroute -v freebsd.org traceroute to freebsd.org (69.147.83.40), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 * * * 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * * * It goes on like this until it reaches 64 hops and then it finishes printing no additional information. Many thanks for any hint what to check! -- Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 22:05:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4D81065673 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05528FC20 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AM5Jnl088358 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:05:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 899C9B82A; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:05:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:05:19 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080310220519.GA57111@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> <20080310183330.GA50364@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080310153901.6836e824@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080310153901.6836e824@scorpio> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: mail server from Windows to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:05:22 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 03:39:01PM -0400, Gerard wrote: > > > And one last thing, how can deliver all mail messages from Outlook > > > Express client from Windows machine to FreeBSD mail server machine? > >=20 > > You can set the FreeBSD machine as the outgoing mail server in > > Outlook. But this might not work, depending on your set-up. If you > > relay the mail to your ISP's mailserver, it probably won't handle > > incoming mail from addresses outside his domain. >=20 > Unless there is some weird firewall, I don't see what the problem would > be. A lot of ISPs don't relay anymore because of spam. Say your ISP is foobar.com. Their mail server where clients can drop their outgoing mail will only accept mail coming from @foobar.com addresses. Since the original poster mentioned people collecting mail (and assumingly sending) from different ISPs (not the one the OP is on) they would run into this problem. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfVsJ8ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWNAACgngvKamQypEvkzSJrcN3vBj9t mDQAoIhqHB1fU8SWgTpr7ht/ufDHAAUm =Sw5s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 21:06:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D191065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gligor_lucian@yahoo.com) Received: from n55.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n55.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [98.136.44.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21D4A8FC1D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gligor_lucian@yahoo.com) Received: from [216.252.122.217] by n55.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Mar 2008 20:52:54 -0000 Received: from [69.147.84.34] by t2.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Mar 2008 20:52:54 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp210.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Mar 2008 20:52:54 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 419108.49602.bm@omp210.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 35340 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Mar 2008 20:52:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=cyJ3fkgZmYGu3OVhCzxo2fnICF3C2Yl4VtBKl9b+SwAn6bCceBI9po/xoYqeXXW49+cZh+yM2wgcygnbOIrvp1gM2Dyx5DOEud+eISAu/a+PhNe40Cnn2krldTwfCFRZI17Kqou2cDEmW83GxAoBGJgWpv8ImSsfZobKP1fLEzQ=; X-YMail-OSG: l7uUF3AVM1muMxDd9__L2DGuop8JOwbDa5dktYbJ Received: from [78.96.92.233] by web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:52:53 PDT Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:52:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Gligor Lucian To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20080310204743.GB81013@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:14:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:06:21 -0000 David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: >> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? >Yes. Thank you very much for your answer. All the best, Gligor Lucian. --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 22:16:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C823F106567D for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4C38FC22 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AMG02D007468; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:16:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2AMFuOO007465; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:15:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:15:56 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Zbigniew Szalbot In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:16:18 -0000 > What should I be diagnosing if I cannot use traceroute? Whatever > domain I try to check, it always times out. The box is behind a > hardware firewall. It also uses pf to some minor degree. However, what do you mean "hardware firewall"? > pfctl -d does not allow me to traceroute either. > > $ traceroute -v freebsd.org > traceroute to freebsd.org (69.147.83.40), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets > > 1 * * * > 2 * * * > 3 * * * > 4 * * * your firewall (whatever "hardware" means) probably block traceroute packets From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 22:20:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7074106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9FE8FC20 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so910500nfb.33 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=R3kDMEoHdB9dq2js3e7GHuTDc6daL22ZB6ikoLig8uU=; b=dnfcbrqCtecEwoqZVtd4HyI6O328itsDk9W9cbgGz/LjE3xoMMaWKb4wnpa0Ea4aIPDFNJQn2HB2qJ15UmFgq6dddZHrkJHxfKQVyYYU+PtokSznMSKI/2hyBDvZKOdMMcBCOAy5s/5kk0YFjesJiNuBOp6foILJ3m8NIp5tvtQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k0zcJRoTNEHM/fEU8h7KWkoH2vR7otGPHNnovH8nkwDJwXF6YPQ53BVIOA6qlNP9c7mY7HN7DSsiIEfsNUWrsSOq/KqK6yZkk8VKZLx6/JqlAuczjJzUwyHoqAwHmpCkO6gKtdlZNTmRIw9gkvS99exSAk+NVmu2NHSyydDv6p4= Received: by 10.78.202.19 with SMTP id z19mr15489344huf.67.1205187655211; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:20:55 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:20:57 -0000 Hello, 2008/3/10, Wojciech Puchar : > > What should I be diagnosing if I cannot use traceroute? Whatever > > domain I try to check, it always times out. The box is behind a > > hardware firewall. It also uses pf to some minor degree. However, > > > what do you mean "hardware firewall"? Dlink DFL-700. > > > > pfctl -d does not allow me to traceroute either. > > > > $ traceroute -v freebsd.org > > traceroute to freebsd.org (69.147.83.40), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets > > > > 1 * * * > > 2 * * * > > 3 * * * > > 4 * * * > > > your firewall (whatever "hardware" means) probably block traceroute > packets Right - thanks. I will see if I can unblock it then. -- Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 22:30:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A252106566B for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0B98FC13 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AMUEKC007538; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:30:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2AMU5ik007534; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:30:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:30:05 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Zbigniew Szalbot In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:30:34 -0000 >> >> what do you mean "hardware firewall"? > > Dlink DFL-700. AFAIK it doesn't contain in-silicon logic to route/block/pass packets according to rules. it works in the same way like computer running say FreeBSD with network cards, just it's dedicated box. today the "hardware" is abused too much. true "hardware" routers/firewalls begins at about 10Gbit/s range, where making this into hardware make sense. >> > 4 * * * >> >> >> your firewall (whatever "hardware" means) probably block traceroute >> packets > > Right - thanks. I will see if I can unblock it then. > traceroute uses UDP packets, no special port numbers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 22:50:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413D41065676 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [207.115.11.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157718FC25 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with ESMTP id <20080310225030H0400a8rohe>; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:50:30 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D5BB26.6080103@datapipe.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:50:14 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: [FreeBSD 7] 3 Terabyte Array Doesn't Attach X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:50:31 -0000 Howdy, Been searching mailling lists and reading the FBSD documentation, but couldn't find an answer. I'm hoping this list can point me in the correct direction. I have a client that wants a raid 6 array, w/ 6 x 750G drives (i.e. 3Terabytes). The machine has a 'HP Smart Array P400' controller (ciss), which we use quite often, just not on an array of this magnitute before. Configuring the array through the raid bios is pretty simple as it's just like any other you would setup. However, the kernel is unable to `attach` the device as is. I am wondering if a) anyone has run into this issue before, and/or b) knows of any good workaround. Here are errors from the logs: Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): got CAM status 0x4 Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): fatal error, failed to attach to device Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): lost device Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): removing device entry Some things I have tried: 2 raid5 arrays w/ gstripe - This yields a usable 3Terabyte partition but this isn't an option due to client restrictions. zfs - works like a charm, but client unwilling to use something 'new'. Restrictions can sometimes be a pain I tell ya. I should mention the mahcine is amd64, not sure if this has any relavance. Help? -P Thanks, Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 23:17:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB491065672 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from twhoffma@math.uio.no) Received: from pat.uio.no (pat.uio.no [129.240.10.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FC88FC1A for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from twhoffma@math.uio.no) Received: from mail-mx8.uio.no ([129.240.10.38]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYqzi-00056S-P8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:01:22 +0100 Received: from smtp.uio.no ([129.240.10.9] helo=mail-mx8.uio.no) by mail-mx8.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYqzi-00010V-Hi for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:01:22 +0100 Received: from mail-web2.uio.no ([129.240.10.19] helo=webmail.uio.no) by mail-mx8.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYqzi-00010R-DI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:01:22 +0100 Received: from 80.202.84.193 (SquirrelMail authenticated user twhoffma) by webmail.uio.no with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:01:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <21440.80.202.84.193.1205190082.squirrel@webmail.uio.no> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:01:22 +0100 (CET) From: "Torgeir Hoffmann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-UiO-Resend: resent X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5) X-UiO-Scanned: B9DED91FDC3DD43A7698D34B4A282D1B10BA9701 X-UiO-SR-test: 95BBD0FEDA30D8AA5609BD44C167B2780EF60D3F X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 129.240.10.9 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 12 total 7331718 max/h 8345 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Subject: [7.0] xorg 7.3 and ati/radeon 6.8.0 woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: twhoffma@student.matnat.uio.no List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:17:49 -0000 Hi, after upgrading my IBM T42 with ati radeon M10/9700) to 7-release via freebsd-update (which went very well), and running portsnap+portupgrade -afP, I tried starting xorg. This results in a complete freeze of the machine, no Ctrl-Alt-Backspace, Ctrl-Alt-Delete, changing terminals or anything else works. I can start xorg as root with the 'vesa' driver. However, any config in xorg.conf with the 'ati'/'radeon' driver causes a freeze. Mostly, it will freeze with either a black screen (backlight on), or simply freeze after printing (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf". I have tried disabling glx, dri, setting NoAccel and AGPMode to "1". Nothing seems to work. The funny thing is that neither /var/log/messages or /var/log/Xorg.0.log has any mention at all of any problems, let alone that I even started Xorg. Also, using xorg 7.2/7.3 in 6.2-release and 6.3-release did not seem to cause any problems. I am at loss to what would be the cause. Will gladly post xorg.conf (generated by Xorg -configure, changed keyboard), and any logs necessary. Hope for quick reply, Best Regards, //Torgeir From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 23:52:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8621065670 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian.minard@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED27C8FC12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian.minard@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1113318ele.12 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:52:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=dm1Uf6W084+ygffkzeuiL/0DlBPtrRfg6Q8TVDlz48M=; b=JaSbndYxPrBQCPeU+akc7n2ETiwbONPqkUKIlE68ZcGLObOAP50BKdUlbLasZVIh3sGXZHO8Rql69O819KVEX7F4l8kRLJTWcIltSs2OGEPCI/6nMU6OdtbCgjdzZrq79RIh2hO+ERakLrTncllv42OpXJLh+wjN+pnIKWiQd9M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=yGd7v/D58iLv1bmaLUrIc+jQgUPl6zpGVTJk8db7WLm6q40NJrVUdr8hw2J1YIVXCnvwZI+TiD1aYvb6YZWtczChlXR5cPJOPJ3trEiHDEHWusMKxJA38ySJZMvEGKS2Ghd/s2n4hRTEibI/ic1zbC1HRSWOAR7eOU0QAQpRUcM= Received: by 10.150.157.11 with SMTP id f11mr3147864ybe.54.1205191535152; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.226.3 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:25:35 -0400 From: "Brian Minard" Sender: brian.minard@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: b058e26e50b1d593 Subject: Trouble Rescuing a System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:52:16 -0000 I am trying to use the Fixit shell from FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE to rescue a system running 7.0 STABLE. The problem is that I can't make the root partition (i.e., "/") for the hard disk writable. I can mount other partitions on the hard disks as writable. The hard disks contain a mirrored GEOM file system. In creating the GEOM mirror I mapped /dev/da0 to /dev/mirror/gm0 and then mirrored gm0 on /dev/da1. (All of the GEOM configuration was done under 6.1 and the system was recently upgraded to 7.0). The fstab I created in the Fixit shell contains the following lines: /dev/da0s1a /mnt/root ufs ro 0 /dev/da0s1d /mnt/var ufs rw 0 Fixit# mount /mnt/root Fixit# mount -u -w /mnt/root mount: /dev/da0s1a: Operation not permitted. Mounting the /var file system works as expected. What can I do to make /mnt/root a writable file system? Thanks, Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 10 23:59:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D323C1065670 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@endries.org) Received: from www.endries.org (www.endries.org [216.230.164.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4326B8FC19 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@endries.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.endries.org [127.0.0.1]) by www.endries.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95052A664CE for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:40:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at endries.org Received: from www.endries.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.endries.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with LMTP id bVi-DKwgDRli for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:40:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.20.30.3] (cpe-74-67-72-121.stny.res.rr.com [74.67.72.121]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.endries.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2945FA664AF for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:40:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47D5C705.2030909@endries.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:40:53 -0400 From: Josh Endries User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Questions about camcontrol, hot-swapping, ciss and Compaq SmartArray X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:35 -0000 Hello, Today I saw that one of my disks seems to be dead/dying in a RAID 5 array I have: http://pastebin.ca/937249 loki.domain.int ciss0: *** Fatal drive error, SCSI port 1 ID 0 loki.domain.int (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 c ae 3f d0 0 0 20 0 loki.domain.int (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error loki.domain.int (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition loki.domain.int (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): MEDIUM ERROR asc:11,0 loki.domain.int (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): Unrecovered read error loki.domain.int (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) I see messages for port 0 only, but varying ID 0-3, and I'm not sure what that means (partition?). After a while the error messages "went away", though the disks were/are still being used. I found cciss_vol_status online but it says the volume is OK (not degraded), which doesn't really make sense to me: # cciss_vol_status /dev/ciss0 /dev/ciss0: (Smart Array 642) RAID 0 Volume 0(?) status: OK. /dev/ciss0: (Smart Array 642) RAID 5 Volume 1(?) status: OK. Is there a way I can tell which port/disk is bad from these messages? Assuming I can determine which disk it is, do I need to do anything in the OS before/after I swap out a drive? I've seen people talk about rescanning and running other camcontrol commands before... Any other tips? Thanks, Josh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 00:00:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC291065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net (fmailhost03.isp.att.net [204.127.217.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9908FC1B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with ESMTP id <20080311000040H0300ickure>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:41 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D5CB98.1030200@datapipe.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:00:24 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org References: <47D5BB26.6080103@datapipe.com> In-Reply-To: <47D5BB26.6080103@datapipe.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [FreeBSD 7] 3 Terabyte Array Doesn't Attach X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:42 -0000 Paul A. Procacci wrote: > Howdy, > > Been searching mailling lists and reading the FBSD documentation, but > couldn't find an answer. I'm hoping this list can point me in the > correct direction. > > I have a client that wants a raid 6 array, w/ 6 x 750G drives (i.e. > 3Terabytes). > > The machine has a 'HP Smart Array P400' controller (ciss), which we > use quite often, just not on an array of this magnitute before. > > Configuring the array through the raid bios is pretty simple as it's > just like any other you would setup. However, the kernel is unable to > `attach` the device as is. I am wondering if a) anyone has run into > this issue before, and/or b) knows of any good workaround. > > Here are errors from the logs: > > Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): got CAM status 0x4 > Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): fatal error, failed > to attach to device > Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): lost device > Mar 6 01:58:40 store1 kernel: (da1:ciss0:0:1:0): removing device entry > > Some things I have tried: > 2 raid5 arrays w/ gstripe - This yields a usable 3Terabyte partition > but this isn't an option due to client restrictions. > zfs - works like a charm, but client unwilling to use something > 'new'. Restrictions can sometimes be a pain I tell ya. > > I should mention the mahcine is amd64, not sure if this has any > relavance. > > Help? -P > > Thanks, > Paul > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Well, I've done more research and came across this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2008-January/027855.html This is disappointing. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 00:34:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518311065672 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net (eastrmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.240.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2628FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080311003403.QCDI24940.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:34:03 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.230.186.138]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id zcZc1Y00J2zbV0s02cZca9; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:33:36 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:34:02 -0400 From: Bob Hall To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20080311003402.GA6673@dublin.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , freebsd-questions References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:34:04 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:30:05PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > traceroute uses UDP packets, no special port numbers. Outgoing is UDP. The return packet is ICMP type 11. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 00:37:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752BD1065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:37:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comperr@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1516.google.com (ug-out-1516.google.com [66.249.92.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC398FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from comperr@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1516.google.com with SMTP id k24so4921909uge.13 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:37:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.198.14 with SMTP id v14mr123379ybf.27.1205195834216; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:37:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-IP: 24.45.43.202 References: <1f43c6f8-0c9b-45a2-92a2-3b51c731a5fd@e31g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <447igcm5oa.fsf@Lowell-Desk.lan> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080201 FreeBSD/i386 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) From: comperr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: subversion -make error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:37:16 -0000 SOLVED following some advice I received on IRC I reinstalled python. On Mar 10, 3:20 am, David Kelly wrote: > On Mar 9, 2008, at 7:02 PM, comperr wrote: > > > > > On Mar 9, 12:40 pm, Lowell Gilbert > well.ilk.org> wrote: > > >> Is python installed from the ports system? > >> What does "which python" tell you? > > > [root@starfx ~]# which python > > [root@starfx ~]# pkg_info -x python > > Information for python-2.5,2: > > .... > > Information for python25-2.5.2_1: > > [root@starfx ~]# pkg_info |grep python > > python-2.5,2 The "meta-port" for the default version of Python > > interpret > > python25-2.5.2_1 An interpreted object-oriented programming > > language > > Python should have been found in /usr/local/bin/python: > > dkelly@Grumpy {1009} which python > /usr/local/bin/python > > -- > David Kelly N4HHE, dke...@HiWAAY.net > ======================================================================== > Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org mailing listhttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 01:05:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79131065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from catalin@starcomms.com) Received: from webmail.starcomms.com (starcomms.com [41.205.191.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 572478FC1E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from catalin@starcomms.com) Received: from (mars.starcomms.local [172.16.2.31]) by webmail.starcomms.com with smtp id 48f0_a81203d4_eefa_11dc_bbaa_001143cecab4; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:35:24 +0100 Received: from STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local ([172.16.2.28]) by webmail.starcomms.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:38:34 +0100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:38:40 +0100 Message-ID: <3A0AA7018522134597ED63B3B794C92A0180F1FB@STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Right way to build package from non-port software Thread-Index: AciDBu/MHsXd2Cq3Qq+eQXBiFNiGKA== From: "Catalin Miclaus" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Mar 2008 23:38:34.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB4FA9E0:01C88307] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Right way to build package from non-port software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:05:38 -0000 Hello guys, =20 What is the right way of building packages for non-ports applications? AFAIK 'make package' and ' pkg_create -b name' are based on ports installed packages. Is there any way of using same commands or additional scripts to achieve similar results? If it matters I'm trying to create packages from net-snmp-5.4.1 sources (needed for 64-bits counters feature) since ports version is based on 5.3.2. Suggestions are welcome. =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 BR, =20 Catalin Miclaus Senior Network/Security Administrator From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 01:12:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BDAC106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329868FC12 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080311011242.QWLI5710.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:12:42 +0000 Message-ID: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:11:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:12:43 -0000 Hello, I've got a 6.2 or 3 box that i'm wanting to update to 7.0. I've cvsupped my source, made world, and built a kernel, all went successfully. This is the GENERIC kernel. When i do a make installkernel i am getting the error kldxref: file isn't dynamically linked Is this a show stopping error/ if so is there a workaround? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 01:56:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342D21065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [74.1.12.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD098FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 12449 invoked by uid 1008); 11 Mar 2008 01:35:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kalins-macbook-pro.local) (kalin@el.net@74.1.12.115) by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 11 Mar 2008 01:35:29 -0000 Message-ID: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:29:49 -0400 From: kalin m User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:56:31 -0000 hi ... i have a simple RAID question(s). this is from the dmesg of a newly installed bsd7: ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 238475MB at ata3-master SATA150 ar0: 238472MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master from what i understand here is that if at the time of installation i install the system on ar0 that means i'd have RAID1 made out of ad4 and ad6. right? is there any configuration to be done? how do i know what driver is being used? it says: hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Feb 24 2008 19:59:27) ............................................. hptrr: no controller detected.' that's it. thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 00:03:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDEB1065680 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:03:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) Received: from apca.co.ug (mail.apca.co.ug [212.88.116.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C178FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) Received: from [192.168.0.103] (helo=IT) by apca.co.ug with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JYgwW-0001qn-AL for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:17:32 +0300 From: "Dedan Kiruri" To: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:19:48 +0300 Organization: APCA Message-ID: <001c01c882a9$0b7881f0$226985d0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AciCqQhXH9REhJWCTfuYD77XPgaofg== Content-Language: en-us X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:19:00 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: How do i regularly update my free bsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:03:47 -0000 Hi I would be interested in getting help through your mailing list spam concerning my free bsd mail server I would like to learn administration using linux/updating virus definitions and scanners. Thank you Dedan Kiruri IT Support Co-ordinator African Palliative Care Association PO Box 72518 Plot 850 Dr Gibbons Road Kampala, Uganda Mob: +256 752 664 514 Tel: +256 414 266251 Fax: +256 414 266217 email: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug www.apca.co.ug APCA's Mission Statement is to promote and support affordable and culturally appropriate Palliative Care throughout Africa This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender ( dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) immediately and destroy all copies of the original e-mail message and any attachments. Any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is prohibited From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 02:38:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EF21065672 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [202.89.146.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82998FC24 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:38:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B836285BC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:38:22 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:38:22 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20080311023822.GA55240@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:38:25 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:30:05PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: [...] > traceroute uses UDP packets, no special port numbers. traceroute(8) indicates that the default UDP port number used is udp/33434, incrementing for each hop out. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- When all else fails, RTFM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 02:40:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175D2106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C428FC1F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F253BE855A; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:40:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: Dave In-Reply-To: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:40:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1205203242.9441.0.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:40:53 -0000 Hi, you have to exec "make installworld" before exec "make installkernel" .. bye Norman Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 21:11 -0400 schrieb Dave: > Hello, > I've got a 6.2 or 3 box that i'm wanting to update to 7.0. I've cvsupped > my source, made world, and built a kernel, all went successfully. This is > the GENERIC kernel. When i do a make installkernel i am getting the error > > kldxref: file isn't dynamically linked > > Is this a show stopping error/ if so is there a workaround? > Thanks. > Dave. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 02:56:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7F31065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from ns.mahan.org (ns.mahan.org [67.116.10.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8788FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:56:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from widowmaker.local (crowTrobot [67.116.10.140]) by ns.mahan.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2B2uTMB063452; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:56:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Message-ID: <47D5F4B5.1030309@mahan.org> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:55:49 -0700 From: Patrick Mahan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Chen References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080311023822.GA55240@osiris.chen.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20080311023822.GA55240@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:56:00 -0000 Jonathan Chen presented these words - circa 3/10/08 7:38 PM-> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:30:05PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > [...] >> traceroute uses UDP packets, no special port numbers. > > traceroute(8) indicates that the default UDP port number used is > udp/33434, incrementing for each hop out. The incrementing is the TTL count in the IP header, not the port number. It works by sending out a UDP packet for a (generally) unused port with the TTL field to a specific number and looking for ICMP errors to indicate how far the packet went (the last node address is contained in the ICMP error reply). However, be warned, some network administrators disable their routers from sending back these types of ICMP messages to prevent you from learning about their routing paths. In these cases, you get back the "1 * * *" type of output from traceroute. Also, by default traceroute attempts to do a reverse DNS on the IP address, so you can speed things up by doing a 'traceroute -n' to avoid this look-up. Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 03:19:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CA51065676 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B28828FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 16042 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2008 02:52:31 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:Thread-Index:In-Reply-To; b=i8vcim6dzhm3ktsBX402Jl+E8lZiiwIP90tJ1nwkltFIAdm5GbZKJUnpUlJ+wPpXd6xd9OtfM9uzcbj+7PJk1niLgIc744u2at9WjeyNJlDf49s0QyTSJyFevJOWcI6m/YqGHxfwB8f06I5n4C8DC4Trec3iBhD2YFDTLdgv66g= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@99.224.65.182 with login) by smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 02:52:31 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: 8doEwC0VM1kvzx4BbODoVg7p52VuUXnj2wSqAi0IbyMKxFJRkzTXXeBmG_JxpyartQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Tamouh H." To: "'kalin m'" , References: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:50:45 -0400 Message-ID: <283601c88322$b4ba8af0$6900a8c0@tamouh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AciDGzI48G6DHIgPSY6taswwYes1JQAB1Ulw In-Reply-To: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> Cc: Subject: RE: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:19:12 -0000 > hi ... >=20 > i have a simple RAID question(s). >=20 > this is from the dmesg of a newly installed bsd7: >=20 > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad6: 238475MB at ata3-master SATA150 > ar0: 238472MB status: READY > ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master > ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master >=20 > from what i understand here is that if at the time of=20 > installation i install the system on ar0 that means i'd have=20 > RAID1 made out of ad4 and ad6. > right? > is there any configuration to be done? > how do i know what driver is being used? it says: > hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Feb 24 2008=20 > 19:59:27) ............................................. > hptrr: no controller detected.' >=20 >=20 > that's it. thanks. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 It is saying "ar0: 238472MB status: READY" So assume it is onboard Intel RAID. When configuring FBSD setup, just = make sure you're selecting the ar0 controller and partition it as you = like. That is it! Tamouh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 03:41:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5AAE106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1768B8FC15 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A75130D62 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id e4J-v+tUWd0T for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C62A8130D61 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:18 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080311034118.GA6115@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080214021958.GA11647@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <47B3B61C.5080701@ongame.com.br> <20080219200958.GA7193@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080219200958.GA7193@phoenix.nasreddine.info> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Fwd: [ Unable to compile sysutils/e2fsprogs ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:41:26 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Wael Nasreddine said, On = Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 09:09:58PM +0100: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Vinicius Vianna said, On = Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 01:31:40AM -0200: > > Hi, > > I think something is broken with your compiler/libs, try to reinstall t= he=20 > > developer packages with sysinstall, or maybe a "make buildworld" to mak= e=20 > > sure everything is ok with your system. > > If someone can please help more, your logs show that basically nothing= =20 > > could be compiled in the ./configure section. > > HTH > Hello, > I tried 'make buildworld', following the comments at the beginning of > this script[1], everything went smoothly during buildworld, but I > still have the same issue... > [1]: http://www.unixadmin.cc/freebsd_buildworld/ Hi guys, I really don't know what's going on, I rebuilt the system with FreeBSD 7.0-Release with just BASE installed and everything's else compiled, I tried compiling e2fsprogs but got the same error, maybe it's something wrong in my /etc/make.conf ?? /etc/make.conf: -------CUT CFLAGS+=3D"-march=3Dpentium4" WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes -------CUT Thanks > > Wael Nasreddine wrote: > >> Hello, I have sent this email to freebsd-ports but I haven't got an > >> answer could you please help me out, I need e2fsprogs because I have 3 > >> External HDDs (USB, a 160, 500 and 750 Gb) and they are ext3 ( The > >> reason that they are ext3 not UFS or other, is because They are USB > >> Hdds, and I sometime connect them to a Linux or Windows box, and ext3 > >> works nicely on windows using http://www.fs-driver.org/ if you know > >> something better please do tell me... > >> Please don't forget to read the forwarded message below which is what > >> this e-mail is all about lol. > >> ----- Forwarded message from Wael Nasreddine ----- > >>> From: Wael Nasreddine > >>> Subject: Unable to compile sysutils/e2fsprogs > >>> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > >>> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:05:52 +0100 > >>> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) > >>> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice i686 > >>> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Feb 4 2008=20 > >>> 15:13:47) > >>> X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc > >>> Message-ID: <20080211020552.GB19613@phoenix.nasreddine.info> > >>> Hello, > >>> I'm having a problem installing e2fsprogs, as you can see in the build > >>> log[1] there's something wrong with the headers... > >>> Thank you. > >>> [1]: http://nopaste.nasreddine.com/64acab1275.html > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH1f9eVWU5RcjdGKIRAjWtAJ9Zmp7AQXfa9nYYEGifnxYSTwvrcgCcCawK 7sAU3h60uOaOMn4VHQZKCco= =Syw0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 03:44:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54921065675 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fchang@cs.ubc.ca) Received: from smtp.cs.ubc.ca (smtp.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.6.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6858FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fchang@cs.ubc.ca) Received: from cascade.cs.ubc.ca (cascade.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.7.7]) by smtp.cs.ubc.ca (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2B3SfHX021306 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:28:42 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:28:40 -0700 (PDT) From: fchang@cs.ubc.ca To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Disable EHCI at boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:44:53 -0000 Hi: Is there a way to disable EHCI at the loader prompt, without having to recompile your kernel? I tried "set hint.ehci.0.disabled=1" but that didn't have any effect. Thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 03:46:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5115C106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:46:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19D4C8FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:46:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 41131 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2008 03:20:04 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=prodigy.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=P1loISU7evpnRACRO1dNKVOYeuAiH+NR/WVE3dUkm1Ff/p8RWQlDyK3AHn2qyTQPsghgNYik92M/XYe12bk+u/4pExzhTIwO7fVxL5Go0xjGORDsOqcuxY3h0ylxTx8msNDi/1aKT6iZxR22YHl6nzVqnPLytj/J05IFh+qfcxA= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?75.7.236.228?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@75.7.236.228 with plain) by smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 03:20:04 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: cDbuplMVM1kYESuHmKzB3zhH7sKhGBysblPpIPOq0cmqOfcBVhsmKoWnUoFkd7nDHMRLqhdZTg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <22c1f1e5cca8ccef59f6c8b107160fd2@prodigy.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: jekillen Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:18:37 -0800 To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: jekillen Subject: re subscribing to the list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:46:45 -0000 Hello; I have unsubscribed form this list but have an emergency and need some suggestions, that are not covered in the manuals or Absolute FreeBSD. Specifically, I have had a machine running with the same root password for some 3 years. There was a power failure tonight and when I rebooted the machine I found I was unable to log in as root. No one other than me uses the machine, but it does run several internet servers, Apache, named, postfix. I doubt that it has been compromised to that degree over the network because I have tcp wrappers blocking ftp and ssh access and have telnet disabled. I have it shut down now incase that is the situation (someone was able to change or corrupt the root password) But it appears that it somehow has just gotten corrupted so it won't work. Is that possible. The long and short is I want to avoid having to re install the system and software. I do not have Apache and Postfix starting automatically at boot. Thanks in advance; Jeff K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 04:41:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0686E1065674 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from schrodinger.com (thermidore.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB628FC21 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from toni.schrodinger.com (toni.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.56]) by schrodinger.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m2B4E9nk032131 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Received: from [10.10.18.38] (sub22-20.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.22.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by toni.schrodinger.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2B4E866048050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gao@schrodinger.com) Message-ID: <47D6070A.1050206@schrodinger.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:02 -0700 From: Simon Gao User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'User Questions'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99]); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Upgrade 4.11 to 7.0, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:05 -0000 Hi, I am trying to see if it's possible to upgrade 4.11 to 7.0 by using cvsup. When I run "make buildworld", I got these errors. Are there packages missing? -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) -------------------------------------------------------------- rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make -DOLD_JOKE=1 -DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200408120\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELLNAME=\"sh\" /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash_tables.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/lst.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/proc.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/shell.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c:107: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c:59: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c:97: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c:55: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c:131: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c:82: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c:80: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c:86: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c:49: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c:102: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c:84: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c:59: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c:96: /usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/make. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 04:42:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E721065674 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2D08FC39 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080311044201.QXVA13220.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com@satellite>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:42:01 +0000 Message-ID: <002801c88332$205c9140$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: "Norman Maurer" References: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> <1205203242.9441.0.camel@norman-laptop> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:41:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:42:02 -0000 Hello, Previously i've done make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel, shutdown to single user mode, mergemaster -p, make installworld, mergemaster, boot multiuser. Has this procedure changed? Thanks. Dave. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Norman Maurer" To: "Dave" Cc: Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 10:40 PM Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 > Hi, > > you have to exec "make installworld" before exec "make installkernel" > .. > > bye > Norman > > Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 21:11 -0400 schrieb Dave: >> Hello, >> I've got a 6.2 or 3 box that i'm wanting to update to 7.0. I've >> cvsupped >> my source, made world, and built a kernel, all went successfully. This is >> the GENERIC kernel. When i do a make installkernel i am getting the error >> >> kldxref: file isn't dynamically linked >> >> Is this a show stopping error/ if so is there a workaround? >> Thanks. >> Dave. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 04:48:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8368106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9AE8FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:48:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2008 00:48:07 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OMQ50753; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:48:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2008 23:47:08 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18390.3860.464819.813587@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:48:20 -0400 To: Simon Gao In-Reply-To: <47D6070A.1050206@schrodinger.com> References: <47D6070A.1050206@schrodinger.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: 'User Questions' Subject: Upgrade 4.11 to 7.0, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:48:09 -0000 Simon Gao writes: > I am trying to see if it's possible to upgrade 4.11 to 7.0 by > using cvsup. Might be possible, certainly wouldn't call it wise. Unless this is an intellectual exercise, get a new disk and install fresh. You'll lose the accumulated cruft, not have to worry about bad configuration files, and can mount the old disk read-only for as long as it takes to believe you have all the desirable data transferred. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 04:50:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7682E1065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ezat@ezatech.com.au) Received: from mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA548FC17 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ezat@ezatech.com.au) Received: from [10.122.95.32] (msgext.cmc.optus.net.au [61.88.171.148]) (authenticated sender ezyt) by mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2B4oG8H023191; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:50:17 +1100 Message-ID: <47D60F89.1090402@ezatech.com.au> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:50:17 +1100 From: Ezat - Ezatech User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) To: Ivailo Bonev References: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> In-Reply-To: <002a01c88298$aac49930$f800000a@chameleon> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail server from Windows to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:50:20 -0000 Hello Ivailo, This is possibly the best how to guide I have found which sets up postfix, dovecot, spamassassin, postfixadmin etc. Currently I have multiple domains which the mail server handles and they all have access either via webmail(Squirrelmail), IMAP & pop. [1]http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4 Regards, ezat Ivailo Bonev wrote: Hello FreeBSDers, I have a Windows machine that get all e-mails, from few accounts, from different Internet providers. I want to setup FreeBSD machine that get all mails from accounts and remote and local users get their mails from that FreeBSD mail storage server. I don't own a domain or MX records. I read many docs in Intrernet, and now I have installed FreeBSD 7.0 RELEASE, with installed fetchmail port (to get mail from various accounts), sendmail-sasl port, and dovecot for IMAP server. But now I'm lost, from where to start configuring FreeBSD mail server? And one last thing, how can deliver all mail messages from Outlook Express client from Windows machine to FreeBSD mail server machine? Any help is appreciated! _______________________________________________ [2]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list [3]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [4]"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" References 1. http://www.purplehat.org/?page_id=4 2. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 3. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions 4. mailto:freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 04:58:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE6F106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDC88FC1F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 156D327E41B; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E61A27E41A; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:58:33 +0000 (UTC) From: D Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Dave In-Reply-To: <002801c88332$205c9140$0200a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: References: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> <1205203242.9441.0.camel@norman-laptop> <002801c88332$205c9140$0200a8c0@satellite> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (BSF 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Norman Maurer Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:58:34 -0000 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 at 00:41 -0400, dmehler26@woh.rr.com confabulated: > Hello, > Previously i've done make buildworld, make buildkernel, make > installkernel, shutdown to single user mode, mergemaster -p, make > installworld, mergemaster, boot multiuser. Has this procedure changed? > Thanks. > Dave. According to: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html under the heading "23.4.1 The Canonical Way to Updating Your System" you would be correct. ----- _|_ |_| | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 05:24:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50E5106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D408FC13 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:24:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080311052428.RIUO13220.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com@satellite>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:24:28 +0000 Message-ID: <004001c88338$0ed05280$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: "D Hill" References: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite><1205203242.9441.0.camel@norman-laptop><002801c88332$205c9140$0200a8c0@satellite> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:23:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Norman Maurer Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:24:29 -0000 Hi, Thanks for your reply. What's my issue with this kernel msg? Thanks. Dave. ----- Original Message ----- From: "D Hill" To: "Dave" Cc: ; "Norman Maurer" Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:58 AM Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 > On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 at 00:41 -0400, dmehler26@woh.rr.com confabulated: > >> Hello, >> Previously i've done make buildworld, make buildkernel, make >> installkernel, shutdown to single user mode, mergemaster -p, make >> installworld, mergemaster, boot multiuser. Has this procedure changed? >> Thanks. >> Dave. > > According to: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html > > under the heading "23.4.1 The Canonical Way to Updating Your System" you > would be correct. > > ----- > _|_ > |_| | > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 05:48:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA2C106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: from duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (duane.dbq.yournetplus.com [65.124.230.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478318FC1A for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from d.hill@yournetplus.com) Received: by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5931927E41B; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duane.dbq.yournetplus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574A727E41A; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:48:49 +0000 (UTC) From: D Hill X-X-Sender: d.hill@duane.dbq.yournetplus.com To: Dave In-Reply-To: <004001c88338$0ed05280$0200a8c0@satellite> Message-ID: References: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite><1205203242.9441.0.camel@norman-laptop><002801c88332$205c9140$0200a8c0@satellite> <004001c88338$0ed05280$0200a8c0@satellite> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (BSF 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Norman Maurer Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:48:50 -0000 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 at 01:23 -0400, dmehler26@woh.rr.com confabulated: > Hi, > Thanks for your reply. What's my issue with this kernel msg? > Thanks. > Dave. > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "D Hill" > To: "Dave" > Cc: ; "Norman Maurer" > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:58 AM > Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 > > >> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 at 00:41 -0400, dmehler26@woh.rr.com confabulated: >> >>> Hello, >>> Previously i've done make buildworld, make buildkernel, make >>> installkernel, shutdown to single user mode, mergemaster -p, make >>> installworld, mergemaster, boot multiuser. Has this procedure changed? >>> Thanks. >>> Dave. >> >> According to: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html >> >> under the heading "23.4.1 The Canonical Way to Updating Your System" you >> would be correct. Someone else will have to pipe in as I do not know the answer to your question. I was just reponding to your procedural response on updating the FBSD OS. ----- _|_ |_| | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 06:17:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D680F106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED888FC20 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6072B3F6172; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:17:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319243F6171; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:17:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D62436.80808@laposte.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:18:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080305 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Catalin Miclaus References: <3A0AA7018522134597ED63B3B794C92A0180F1FB@STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local> In-Reply-To: <3A0AA7018522134597ED63B3B794C92A0180F1FB@STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Right way to build package from non-port software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:17:30 -0000 Catalin Miclaus wrote: > Hello guys, > > > > What is the right way of building packages for non-ports applications? > > AFAIK 'make package' and ' pkg_create -b name' are based on ports > installed packages. > > Is there any way of using same commands or additional scripts to achieve > similar results? > > If it matters I'm trying to create packages from net-snmp-5.4.1 sources > (needed for 64-bits counters feature) since ports version is based on > 5.3.2. > > Suggestions are welcome. What I would do is: 1. check if there is a PR pending, with an update to the new version; 2. try to adapt the existing port to the new version. Doing 2. should not be much more complicated than building from source, see Porter's Handbook, mainly the ``quick porting'' if you want to do it this way. You do not really need the port infrastructure to use pkg_create, so it seems to be the right tool you were looking for. Hope this helps, -- Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 06:21:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0691065672 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madhabhaktula@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621058FC23 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:21:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from madhabhaktula@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so5258560uge.37 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:21:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=IAjmR5A6RF0DAmfc77rzLbNJHyJeGgZKnXoKRy8U9yI=; b=jm2NZuLBPHdz7WUlrXM0jnLxsJTTqdy0Xh2zu8NtE6WL0aYquUMSxz4p513vCPeodGjkVg+ArGX6iNJYQeqEHyKZ55S4WMOelQG6roQw93cIwNeFYaPDdDIih8UNZuU7H9o8TzqodulwfNwcOkqLqQcguBJDBBLxEVnqnsiFDNU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=aXZeuxf+srvKFpBQhS83DK2HE0ECtNNMCsuSeRqux883U2Uzae/Zk2YPvDCvngaQNb3DEklucfCUBaYGrfa8mybRc8uypMAb26J1nRsWe61HnT4IFNR1LsIJkDyqy67l8YLeLrFIz38BKOuP9d5m6JJpQaUzILX6a5af0v2cF+Y= Received: by 10.66.244.2 with SMTP id r2mr4456389ugh.64.1205214952628; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.238.17 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4bdebb200803102255l77c60234h828ffb6b8e47abc2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:25:52 +0530 From: "venkata kiran madhabhaktula" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Interested in FreeBSD project developement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:21:40 -0000 Hello team, I am a software engineer, having an experience of above 2 years in programming with C, C++ on UNIX platform. I have the strong programming skills in C and C++. I have seen the list of projects that are available. I am interested to involve in the project developement of FreeBSD projects, but no idea about how to proceed on this. So please guide me, about whom to contact and how to proceed further. Thanks in advance. Regards Kiran. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 06:24:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F85106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: from hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (hal.Rescomp.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D808FC1A for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu) Received: by hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu (Postfix, from userid 1225) id EF4BA3C04B2; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:24:33 -0700 From: Christopher Cowart To: Catalin Miclaus Message-ID: <20080311062433.GY30324@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Catalin Miclaus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3A0AA7018522134597ED63B3B794C92A0180F1FB@STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e8znkWhb8vS+si4n" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A0AA7018522134597ED63B3B794C92A0180F1FB@STA-HQ-S001.starcomms.local> Organization: RSSP-IT, UC Berkeley User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Right way to build package from non-port software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:34 -0000 --e8znkWhb8vS+si4n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:38:40AM +0100, Catalin Miclaus wrote: > What is the right way of building packages for non-ports applications? >=20 > AFAIK 'make package' and ' pkg_create -b name' are based on ports > installed packages. >=20 > Is there any way of using same commands or additional scripts to achieve > similar results? >=20 > If it matters I'm trying to create packages from net-snmp-5.4.1 sources > (needed for 64-bits counters feature) since ports version is based on > 5.3.2. >=20 > Suggestions are welcome. In this situation, my team generally gets its hands dirty and bumps the port. Usually it's as easy as updating the PORTVERSION variable. Then attach the port diff to a PR and it'll be updated in the official ports tree fast.=20 Unfortunately, net-snmp looks like a pretty complex port that isn't going to be quite so easy. You might consider pinging the maintainer about the new upstream version to see if there's any interest in bumping the port. You might also just be able to write your own port for the new version =66rom scratch (it sounds like you just grabbed the source tarball and didn't apply all the FreeBSD patches). See the handbook [1]. Your best bet may be a combination of the two approaches.=20 [1] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick= -porting.html Good luck, --=20 Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley --e8znkWhb8vS+si4n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iQIVAwUBR9YloSPHEDszU3zYAQI4PA/+Knq3+HEooQp7ONHhOABBqZPKTuJ4Ed2k Rqc6Dj0lDKUkuwVmNIYGj3mZswrAYRISCPxRHE/C9TmNl+LI5lKv8bTmBckE6UuS PKYCrRr+N+l3+QMySYCsXMJqnw8inajfMBHtq8qBz0ltsCmmnxlqyGEtwxack19i n7WA9KOrnPBepfddM6uL9Vdjc8vVeg1ZhWUB7wAYhs/MaRSClT+QqdbYQImqQjqj yAxSI/fla/ZWZMsmxig3mb9J6leajy3eM7sqlpOx4hH3hKlr6ZBaEyRTMHc0oVvz BD2wtsBLiGjZXZ0c7yySJzkap+Xl79ByMg7ohn09GWue0HmuihZCuP1e9EPrfzK/ 9YZwlvCZYFZvavirHcBbcleF/zIOkjQ0kqcBPrevVPBG6C40RPt9VtCO+Y7hVmXm +kapmynqjsTKAGcIv/5YJfXGXhFSVYK1+/4+J5k3WVH1JKs/GZMTDIam8p8W8wOI z3syydw9JjeoHR7RkHtPgole8ueiSogmLXHbc/doVeJ4FO28khOZZUFHNc6fmwvl iAPnizFOU1u5MAIMKrKgtWlVw5Sm8OBGWgzqJLrOfajxF83bbBmPIidj7Y0Qc8gT uCuFVES3qyEmu85VZ2AobzGPwF+lkQuKxyWmQ5BD4TzVrVdeokI2ZLssKZKLFYo2 MDnYJUMvLdI= =0lRz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e8znkWhb8vS+si4n-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 06:24:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9251065682 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85A78FC17 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2B6O1UR002682; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:24:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2B6No50002679; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:23:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:23:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Patrick Mahan In-Reply-To: <47D5F4B5.1030309@mahan.org> Message-ID: <20080311072300.K2678@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080311023822.GA55240@osiris.chen.org.nz> <47D5F4B5.1030309@mahan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , freebsd-questions , Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:24:43 -0000 > to prevent you from learning about their routing paths. In these cases, > you get back the "1 * * *" type of output from traceroute. Also, by > default traceroute attempts to do a reverse DNS on the IP address, so > you can speed things up by doing a 'traceroute -n' to avoid this look-up. > many commercial firewalls, including those in integrated devices, tend to block everything excluding often used services. some even block ICMP ping. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 07:09:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88766106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:09:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BBD8FC19 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2B79e5b030295; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:09:41 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2B79e5b030295 Message-ID: <47D6302E.7000400@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:09:34 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <001c01c88314$e2c53a20$0200a8c0@satellite> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig327A0895DBC5BFC70C2E60DF" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:09:41 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6193/Mon Mar 10 23:22:45 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel error when upgrading to 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:09:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig327A0895DBC5BFC70C2E60DF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got a 6.2 or 3 box that i'm wanting to update to 7.0. I've=20 > cvsupped my source, made world, and built a kernel, all went=20 > successfully. This is the GENERIC kernel. When i do a make installkerne= l=20 > i am getting the error >=20 > kldxref: file isn't dynamically linked >=20 > Is this a show stopping error/ if so is there a workaround? This is harmless and can be ignored. It's caused by 6.x utilities trying to operate on a 7.0 kernel and its loadable modules, which doesn't work. Just proceed with the next steps in the upgrade=20 procedure and it will all work fine. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig327A0895DBC5BFC70C2E60DF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkfWMDQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyqfQCfS8sbENSRZm7Utxj7c0ie7B3r 10YAnRq/Zmm5Yy9TuBG+Qyi96SVTh/v6 =X3IN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig327A0895DBC5BFC70C2E60DF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 08:08:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BE41065684 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com) Received: from ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF808FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAIfW1Ud5LUIl/2dsb2JhbACBWKlR X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,479,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="71027992" Received: from ppp121-45-66-37.lns10.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO mail.clearchain.com) ([121.45.66.37]) by ipmail04.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2008 18:23:09 +1030 Received: from [192.168.155.236] (taurus.internal.clearchain.com [192.168.155.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.clearchain.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2B7qsuR016049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:22:55 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from Benjamin.Close@clearchain.com) Message-ID: <47D63A65.8010507@clearchain.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:23:09 +1030 From: Benjamin Close User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <47C078EC.4020907@student.utwente.nl> <47C08AA4.80009@student.utwente.nl> <47C19257.9050202@student.utwente.nl> <200802241730.13328.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200802241730.13328.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on pegasus.clearchain.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.clearchain.com [192.168.154.1]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:22:57 +1030 (CST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Wireless] Can't connect to wlan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:08:42 -0000 Mel, Do the recent patches by Andrew make a difference? http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_head.diff http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_releng7.diff Mel wrote: > Redirect -> freebsd-mobile, cc Ben > > Ref: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-November/080653.html > > On Sunday 24 February 2008 16:50:47 Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > >> Okay, so here goes: >> >> SYNOPSIS >> >> Wireless network gets detected, but has "no carrier". So I can't connect. >> >> PROMPT >> >> All prompts are indicated as $ to avoid confusion with #-comment lines, but >> in reality most things are done by root. >> >> THE NETWORK >> >> SSID: SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> radio type: 11g >> security type: WPA2-PSK >> PSK: known >> Station: Thomson ST 780 WL Wireless modem >> Signal: present (Windows picks it up right away) and generally excellent >> >> THE COMPUTER >> >> Thoshiba Satellite P200 1A4 notebook >> Wireless card: Intel 3945ABG >> OS: FreeBSD 7.0-RC3 >> >> KERNEL >> >> The driver for the Intel 3945ABG card is wpi. >> As instructed by its manpage, my /boot/loader.conf reads: >> >> $ cat /boot/loader.conf >> if_wpi_load="YES" >> wlan_load="YES" >> wlan_amrr_load="YES" >> firmware_load="YES" >> wpifw_load="YES" >> wlan_xauth_load="YES" >> >> legal.intel_wpi.license_ack=1 >> $ >> >> Relevant dmesg greps: >> >> $ dmesg|grep wpi >> wpi0: mem 0xd8000000-0xd8000fff irq 17 at >> device 0.0 on pci4 >> wpi0: Ethernet address: 00:1b:77:b5:98:bd >> wpi0: [ITHREAD] >> wpi0: 11a rates: 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps >> wpi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps >> wpi0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps >> 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps >> $ dmesg|grep wlan >> $ dmesg|grep firmware >> $ >> >> CONFIGURATION >> >> My /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf: >> > > As you can see in the aboved mentioned URL, wpi and wpa_supplicant don't play > nice. I had the same problem yesterday, setting wpi through ifconfig (WEP in > my case) and the card just works. > I also had the bluetooth message, but Fonz doesn't seem to have that. > > # ident /boot/kernel/if_wpi.ko > /boot/kernel/if_wpi.ko: > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/wpi/if_wpi.c,v 1.5.2.2 2008/02/02 06:49:57 sam Exp > $ > > My kernel is GENERIC with ULE scheduler rather then 4BSD. I want to > investigate more this week, with a debug kernel and/or wpi in debug mode. > Since RELENG_7 is probably thawed/frozen, is there patches from -current you > can backport to have tested? > > Leaving the rest of the email in tact so you have a full report. > > >> $ cat /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf >> #eapol_version=2 >> >> network={ >> ssid="SpeedTouch1EC5E8" >> psk="********" (the correct preshared key, that is) >> # bssid=00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 >> mode=0 >> proto=WPA RSN >> # key_mgmt=WPA-PSK >> # pairwise=CCMP >> # group=CCMP >> scan_ssid=1 >> } >> $ >> >> STEPS >> >> $ wpa_supplicant -d -i wpi0 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant >> Initializing interface 'wpi0' conf '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf' driver >> 'default' ctrl_interface 'N/A' bridge 'N/A' >> Configuration file '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf' -> '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf' >> Reading configuration file '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf' >> Priority group 0 >> id=0 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> Initializing interface (2) 'wpi0' >> EAPOL: SUPP_PAE entering state DISCONNECTED >> EAPOL: KEY_RX entering state NO_KEY_RECEIVE >> EAPOL: SUPP_BE entering state INITIALIZE >> EAP: EAP entering state DISABLED >> EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0 >> Own MAC address: 00:1b:77:b5:98:bd >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_wpa: enabled=1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_wpa_internal: wpa=3 privacy=1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_del_key: keyidx=0 >> wpa_driver_bsd_del_key: keyidx=1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_del_key: keyidx=2 >> wpa_driver_bsd_del_key: keyidx=3 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_countermeasures: enabled=0 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1 >> Setting scan request: 0 sec 100000 usec >> Added interface wpi0 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> State: DISCONNECTED -> SCANNING >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Trying to get current scan results first without requesting a new scan to >> speed up initial association >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 0 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (0 BSSes) >> Scan results: 0 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> No suitable AP found. >> Setting scan request: 5 sec 0 usec >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (1 BSSes) >> Scan results: 1 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> 0: 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa_ie_len=30 rsn_ie_len=26 >> caps=0x11 >> selected based on RSN IE >> selected WPA AP 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> Trying to associate with 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 (SSID='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> freq=2437 MHz) >> Cancelling scan request >> WPA: clearing own WPA/RSN IE >> Automatic auth_alg selection: 0x1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_auth_alg alg 0x1 authmode 1 >> RSN: using IEEE 802.11i/D9.0 >> WPA: Selected cipher suites: group 8 pairwise 24 key_mgmt 2 proto 2 >> WPA: set AP WPA IE - hexdump(len=30): dd 1c 00 50 f2 01 01 00 00 50 f2 02 >> 02 00 00 50 f2 04 00 50 f2 02 01 00 00 50 f2 02 0c 00 >> WPA: set AP RSN IE - hexdump(len=26): 30 18 01 00 00 0f ac 02 02 00 00 0f >> ac 04 00 0f ac 02 01 00 00 0f ac 02 0c 00 >> WPA: using GTK TKIP >> WPA: using PTK CCMP >> WPA: using KEY_MGMT WPA-PSK >> WPA: Set own WPA IE default - hexdump(len=22): 30 14 01 00 00 0f ac 02 01 >> 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 02 00 00 >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1 >> State: SCANNING -> ASSOCIATING >> wpa_driver_bsd_associate: ssid 'SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa ie len 22 pairwise 3 >> group 2 key mgmt 1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_associate: set PRIVACY 1 >> Setting authentication timeout: 10 sec 0 usec >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP fail=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portControl=Auto >> RSN: Ignored PMKID candidate without preauth flag >> Authentication with 00:00:00:00:00:00 timed out. >> Added BSSID 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 into blacklist >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> State: ASSOCIATING -> DISCONNECTED >> EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0 >> Setting scan request: 0 sec 0 usec >> State: DISCONNECTED -> SCANNING >> Starting AP scan (specific SSID) >> Scan SSID - hexdump_ascii(len=16): >> 53 70 65 65 64 54 6f 75 63 68 31 45 43 35 45 38 SpeedTouch1EC5E8 >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (1 BSSes) >> Scan results: 1 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> 0: 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa_ie_len=30 rsn_ie_len=26 >> caps=0x11 >> selected based on RSN IE >> selected WPA AP 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> Trying to associate with 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 (SSID='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> freq=2437 MHz) >> Cancelling scan request >> WPA: clearing own WPA/RSN IE >> Automatic auth_alg selection: 0x1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_auth_alg alg 0x1 authmode 1 >> RSN: using IEEE 802.11i/D9.0 >> WPA: Selected cipher suites: group 8 pairwise 24 key_mgmt 2 proto 2 >> WPA: set AP WPA IE - hexdump(len=30): dd 1c 00 50 f2 01 01 00 00 50 f2 02 >> 02 00 00 50 f2 04 00 50 f2 02 01 00 00 50 f2 02 0c 00 >> WPA: set AP RSN IE - hexdump(len=26): 30 18 01 00 00 0f ac 02 02 00 00 0f >> ac 04 00 0f ac 02 01 00 00 0f ac 02 0c 00 >> WPA: using GTK TKIP >> WPA: using PTK CCMP >> WPA: using KEY_MGMT WPA-PSK >> WPA: Set own WPA IE default - hexdump(len=22): 30 14 01 00 00 0f ac 02 01 >> 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 02 00 00 >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1 >> State: SCANNING -> ASSOCIATING >> wpa_driver_bsd_associate: ssid 'SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa ie len 22 pairwise 3 >> group 2 key mgmt 1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_associate: set PRIVACY 1 >> Setting authentication timeout: 10 sec 0 usec >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP fail=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portControl=Auto >> RSN: Ignored PMKID candidate without preauth flag >> Authentication with 00:00:00:00:00:00 timed out. >> BSSID 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 blacklist count incremented to 2 >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> State: ASSOCIATING -> DISCONNECTED >> EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0 >> Setting scan request: 0 sec 0 usec >> State: DISCONNECTED -> SCANNING >> Starting AP scan (broadcast SSID) >> Received 0 bytes of scan results (1 BSSes) >> Scan results: 1 >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> 0: 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa_ie_len=30 rsn_ie_len=26 >> caps=0x11 >> skip - blacklisted >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> 0: 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa_ie_len=30 rsn_ie_len=26 >> caps=0x11 >> skip - blacklisted >> No APs found - clear blacklist and try again >> Removed BSSID 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 from blacklist (clear) >> Selecting BSS from priority group 0 >> Try to find WPA-enabled AP >> 0: 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa_ie_len=30 rsn_ie_len=26 >> caps=0x11 >> selected based on RSN IE >> selected WPA AP 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 ssid='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> Try to find non-WPA AP >> Trying to associate with 00:90:d0:f3:e1:d2 (SSID='SpeedTouch1EC5E8' >> freq=2437 MHz) >> Cancelling scan request >> WPA: clearing own WPA/RSN IE >> Automatic auth_alg selection: 0x1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_auth_alg alg 0x1 authmode 1 >> RSN: using IEEE 802.11i/D9.0 >> WPA: Selected cipher suites: group 8 pairwise 24 key_mgmt 2 proto 2 >> WPA: set AP WPA IE - hexdump(len=30): dd 1c 00 50 f2 01 01 00 00 50 f2 02 >> 02 00 00 50 f2 04 00 50 f2 02 01 00 00 50 f2 02 0c 00 >> WPA: set AP RSN IE - hexdump(len=26): 30 18 01 00 00 0f ac 02 02 00 00 0f >> ac 04 00 0f ac 02 01 00 00 0f ac 02 0c 00 >> WPA: using GTK TKIP >> WPA: using PTK CCMP >> WPA: using KEY_MGMT WPA-PSK >> WPA: Set own WPA IE default - hexdump(len=22): 30 14 01 00 00 0f ac 02 01 >> 00 00 0f ac 04 01 00 00 0f ac 02 00 00 >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1 >> State: SCANNING -> ASSOCIATING >> wpa_driver_bsd_associate: ssid 'SpeedTouch1EC5E8' wpa ie len 22 pairwise 3 >> group 2 key mgmt 1 >> wpa_driver_bsd_associate: set PRIVACY 1 >> Setting authentication timeout: 10 sec 0 usec >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP success=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - EAP fail=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portControl=Auto >> RSN: Ignored PMKID candidate without preauth flag >> >> (after which it keeps repeating the above story until I stop it) >> >> CTRL-EVENT-TERMINATING - signal 2 received >> Removing interface wpi0 >> State: ASSOCIATING -> DISCONNECTED >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> EAPOL: External notification - portEnabled=0 >> EAPOL: External notification - portValid=0 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_wpa: enabled=0 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_wpa_internal: wpa=0 privacy=0 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=0 >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_countermeasures: enabled=0 >> No keys have been configured - skip key clearing >> Cancelling scan request >> Cancelling authentication timeout >> wpa_driver_bsd_set_wpa_internal: wpa=0 privacy=1 >> $ >> >> After this: >> >> $ ifcondig wpi0 >> wpi0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> ether 00:1b:77:b5:98:bd >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g (DS/1Mbps) >> status: no carrier >> ssid SpeedTouch1EC5E8 channel 6 (2437 Mhz 11g) >> authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF txpower 50 bmiss 7 >> scanvalid 60 protmode CTS roaming MANUAL >> $ >> >> As you can see, there's still no carrier, so >> >> $ dhclient wpi0 >> wpi0: no link .............. giving up >> $ >> >> If there's anything else you need to know, just holler. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Alphons >> > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 09:02:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5031065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wearabnet@yahoo.ca) Received: from web33708.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33708.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A4838FC1E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wearabnet@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 98942 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Mar 2008 09:02:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=fBd3BmFrRfYv8rYOf0St2zQMr8757KlkzXWBMMMO9wMFvxrXhRbPR+ajy0hTFMA+Ex4uEvN3UFLXGaD688D7seweXSpnGto+kzmurgZNd7zJUGDhseFqicmbG4OuzEGABb70DyRjz6dl53AMRq85v+LrxAFNsbadYkMLCr3M1vw=; X-YMail-OSG: .pagVQEVM1kb4L5.h2FK3XaSUPUALb5JxAMA3X_EsyjI3T46q6_kEPXPvP7p.mH3GJQWuL2jJDLXwnW5fey4zL04.Kt0KZeFoO0Sfnmv4fQRXqCZFE8- Received: from [212.77.203.38] by web33708.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:02:56 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/902.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.162 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:02:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri To: Simon Gao , User Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <714254.98550.qm@web33708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrade 4.11 to 7.0, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:02:57 -0000 ----- Original Message ---- > From: Simon Gao > To: User Questions > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:14:02 AM > Subject: Upgrade 4.11 to 7.0, possible? > > Hi, > > I am trying to see if it's possible to upgrade 4.11 to 7.0 by using cvsup. > > When I run "make buildworld", I got these errors. Are there packages > missing? > > Simon Upgrade to RELENG_5 then to RELENG_6 then to RELENG_7 Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 09:43:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C044D106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941618FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2B9gRMk001855; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:42:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2B9gMws001852; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:42:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:42:22 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Brian Minard In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080311104216.P1845@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble Rescuing a System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:43:11 -0000 > > /dev/da0s1a /mnt/root ufs ro 0 > /dev/da0s1d /mnt/var ufs rw 0 > > Fixit# mount /mnt/root > Fixit# mount -u -w /mnt/root > mount: /dev/da0s1a: Operation not permitted. fsck it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 10:06:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBDE1065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdragan@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2A08FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdragan@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so2662344fka.11 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:06:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PLVyFeiWZ3Cf08SLyT9pSXSLAgAr22fjkiHazAvGlqQ=; b=O2oAAus6N2ioqaG5LgOzTd/PfaYAkiMqrv3CVVYdIay9pfi07jUCLscUVGM7o9ldBwLZzAw6Aio63QTVSj7Qcdj85PBNEVCPuX4SzkpJ1JxN254Fq9XveC6Md/0fqz12rgwPDLTYhuVkWb6hBYXb8ClGmpTV8vfgIGznpv/cZ4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pqEMoIi2K22BPgTJkM+sU9SaaQb+aKm8Q9Ozd4sNAogr2XMFRW+djjtSV3Z+PAAtNC4H2Uu8fTdiEi8cMr7/5o8jlUJzvVfWcs5XT9oXMqVgpILJCtVMqS/PvaASfeZ41xt1qRQ/Eg0wVP5TM9lPzGNQvo5hAxk0PEf9Z0WRLeY= Received: by 10.82.138.6 with SMTP id l6mr15951829bud.35.1205229983860; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?10.0.2.206? ( [87.116.145.63]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q9sm1610507gve.10.2008.03.11.03.06.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47D65995.40508@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:06:13 +0100 From: Dragan Jovelic User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47AAFBE8.7080307@gmail.com> <200802071412.26884.wundram@beenic.net> <47AB1993.70507@gmail.com> <200802071551.00599.wundram@beenic.net> In-Reply-To: <200802071551.00599.wundram@beenic.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Strange apache logs [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:06:25 -0000 Last month I posted a question to this list, about strange entires in httpd access log, which were connections from localhost, looking like this: ::1 - - [06/Feb/2008:13:43:58 -0500] "OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0" 200 - After some investigation I found out what is the cause of this. When I turned on in httpd.conf to log UserAgent string as well, found out that UserAgent for this requests is "internal dummy connection". Google search for that, gave this page on apache site, which explains what is it about: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/InternalDummyConnection From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 10:40:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7CC106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC73A8FC26 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id B18AA78D3B; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:40:43 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [83.205.52.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4538178D22 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:40:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D661AA.1080400@nicoelro.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:40:42 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How specify an other mail directory for users? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:40:45 -0000 Hello, In my FreeBSD 7.0 (with postfix), when a user receive an email, it is stocked in /var/mail$/USER. How change this? I would like mails be stocked in /var/mail/users/$USER. I don't find a file to change this. Is it a system conf, or a SMTP conf? Thanks. - Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 10:51:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E12106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from mail.nicoelro.net (helm.nicoelro.net [87.98.216.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637FA8FC2A for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id A2CAB78D3B; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:51:11 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on helm.nicoelro.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [83.205.52.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@nicoelro.net) by mail.nicoelro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EC078D22 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:51:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D6641E.2050605@nicoelro.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:51:10 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <47D661AA.1080400@nicoelro.net> In-Reply-To: <47D661AA.1080400@nicoelro.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: How specify an other mail directory for users? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:51:12 -0000 Nicolas Letellier a crit : > Hello, > > In my FreeBSD 7.0 (with postfix), when a user receive an email, it is stocked in /var/mail$/USER. > How change this? I would like mails be stocked in /var/mail/users/$USER. > > I don't find a file to change this. Is it a system conf, or a SMTP conf? > > Thanks. > > - Nicolas. > Hum... In main.cf: mail_spool_directory = /var/mail/users It works. -Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 12:09:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A805106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:09:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4189D8FC1E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:09:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E178F1CCAC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:09:38 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:09:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <22c1f1e5cca8ccef59f6c8b107160fd2@prodigy.net> In-Reply-To: <22c1f1e5cca8ccef59f6c8b107160fd2@prodigy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803111309.37340.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: jekillen Subject: Re: re subscribing to the list X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:09:41 -0000 On Tuesday 11 March 2008 05:18:37 jekillen wrote: > I have it shut down now incase that is the situation (someone was able to > change or corrupt the root password) But it appears that it somehow has > just gotten corrupted so it won't work. Is that possible. > The long and short is I want to avoid having to re install the system > and software. So boot into single user mode: # fsck -p / # mount -u / # mount -o ro /usr # env EDITOR=/usr/bin/vi vipw On the root entry, change the part between the first and second colon (':') to a star ('*'), write and exit (:wq) and set password for using passwd command. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 12:38:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1769106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA298FC24 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4E01CCAC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:38:34 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:38:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <5cc715c00803101419n7531b40dmff3eab0e0c63dc7a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5cc715c00803101419n7531b40dmff3eab0e0c63dc7a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803111338.33142.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Alex Hanson Subject: Re: Solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:38:35 -0000 On Monday 10 March 2008 22:19:12 Alex Hanson wrote: > I was trying to install FreeBSD and kept getting an Umass error. > > The problem was that i had a thumb drive pluged in, you may want to put > that in the manual Because? Install failed? Because you had 'boot from usb' set in BIOS before boot from CD/HDD? You may want to use send-pr(1). -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 12:43:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6DD106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@web4.danhost.dk) Received: from asmtp.danhost.dk (asmtp.danhost.dk [195.140.132.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A328FC22 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nobody@web4.danhost.dk) Received: from web4.danhost.dk (web4.danhost.dk [195.140.132.204]) by asmtp.danhost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8780B101D85 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:18:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from web4.danhost.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web4.danhost.dk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BCIrgf063572 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:18:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nobody@web4.danhost.dk) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by web4.danhost.dk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m2BCIqx0063571; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:18:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nobody) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:18:52 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200803111218.m2BCIqx0063571@web4.danhost.dk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-PHP-Script: www.toftehoej.dk/docs/mail.php for 41.211.230.94, 81.169.145.25, 81.169.145.25 From: Hameed Faizal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: RE: Enquiry For Quotation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: hameedfaizal22@iraq.ir List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:36 -0000 Attention: The Managing Director, RE: Enquiry For Quotation. Can your company quote for an urgent project for both Iraq and Afghanistan Governments under a Joint Contracting Command program? If it is in your jurisdiction, then kindly respond and send a presentational information on your specialty and working terms for immediate evaluation. We would appreciate to discuss this important project with ONLY the top most official of your establishment. Thank you and kindly treat as urgent. Reply to: hameedfaizal22@iraq.ir Hameed Faizal, Foreign Affairs Ministry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 12:43:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832251065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ibb_orac@mbox.contact.bg) Received: from sd97.btc-net.bg (SD97.btc-net.bg [212.39.90.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F173D8FC13 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ibb_orac@mbox.contact.bg) Received: (qmail 17810 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2008 12:43:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chameleon) (83.228.34.40) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 12:43:47 -0000 Message-ID: <041f01c88375$88739e70$f800000a@chameleon> From: "Ivailo Bonev" To: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:43:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="windows-1251"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: SMTP Autentication and sendmail-sasl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:49 -0000 Is sendmail-sasl port doing everything from what is written in SMTP Autentication section in Handbook? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 13:00:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D651065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meitolake@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83F48FC1A for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meitolake@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e11so1561268rng.7 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=eS/LYmyI5pj9vaBOX8Q282FnUrrKHkuW2UiMytZ0qqU=; b=fXt6fhO0+wFF6Hjp3Q+sSXUwg/GZlg8/pylvX/3B8w8dLuerhioph33ytvuUj+Dp1KurftBNGm/zNWWp5Bi8flRMO5xFbRou9JgOHJqjYor/kAthgbLp3mmKlOiMPQfeoTacZ3SflK22yftU5GzI/DDbClwPDOA7HB2VYsGcQpo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=u7NMdnSk3jm7JREqRiHoExojyusFS4Swob0EfxBEtpRtqnzXLyCgwegZ2argdRG1Kq6XiyANloMPQy+EEYfbLCo4fQsrztO+M5iEZdX1M7p52DizXJ4bHbtcSMt9X+6XqQTRb68KWu6qIHASD28wMBLV8lFgCdVZg40clDotbAs= Received: by 10.151.12.1 with SMTP id p1mr3609276ybi.152.1205238930761; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.96.19 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:35:30 +0800 From: "Liang Zhang" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: xorg 7.3 i810 screen frozen X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:00:13 -0000 My graphics chipsets is i810. I updated to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE via freebsd-update and installed xorg 7.3 from Ports. I tried starting xorg, my screen is frozen. I can start xorg with the 'vesa' driver. However, any config in xorg.conf with the 'i810' or 'intel' driver causes a freeze. I use xorg 7.3 in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE did not seem to cause any problems. Hope for reply. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 13:31:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A378106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:31:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2D58FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JXK00AA9IW9NI20@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:31:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2BDVKfS001094; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:31:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:31:15 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <4bdebb200803102255l77c60234h828ffb6b8e47abc2@mail.gmail.com> To: venkata kiran madhabhaktula Message-id: <47D689A3.9090103@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 References: <4bdebb200803102255l77c60234h828ffb6b8e47abc2@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080309) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Interested in FreeBSD project developement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:31:24 -0000 venkata kiran madhabhaktula wrote: > Hello team, > > I am a software engineer, having an experience of above 2 years in > programming with C, C++ on UNIX platform. I have the strong programming > skills in C and C++. > I have seen the list of projects that are available. I am interested to > involve in the project developement of FreeBSD projects, but no idea about > how to proceed on this. > So please guide me, about whom to contact and how to proceed further. Thanks > in advance. > There seems to be no "official" way to do it but must people seem to start by looking through the PR database and selecting PR's they think they can solve and do it. You should read the developers handbook, porters guide and the internals of FreeBSD before you do anything too heavy though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 13:33:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C76106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD2C8FC1F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:33:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JXK00C0QIZYTXR0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:33:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2BDXYAZ001103; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:33:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:33:29 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <47D689A3.9090103@gmail.com> To: venkata kiran madhabhaktula Message-id: <47D68A29.1080308@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 References: <4bdebb200803102255l77c60234h828ffb6b8e47abc2@mail.gmail.com> <47D689A3.9090103@gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080309) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Interested in FreeBSD project developement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:33:53 -0000 > > There seems to be no "official" way to do it but must people seem to > start by looking through the PR database and selecting PR's they think > they can solve and do it. You should read the developers handbook, > porters guide and the internals of FreeBSD before you do anything too > heavy though. Forgot to mention a fantastic place to start might be to figure out why none of the precompiled JDK's work on 8-current From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 15:18:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32141065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549098FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BFHrOR031928; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:17:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080311095236.02506560@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:19:40 -0500 To: Simon Gao , "'User Questions'" From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <47D6070A.1050206@schrodinger.com> References: <47D6070A.1050206@schrodinger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080310-0, 03/10/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrade 4.11 to 7.0, possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:18:22 -0000 At 11:14 PM 3/10/2008, Simon Gao wrote: >Hi, > >I am trying to see if it's possible to upgrade 4.11 to 7.0 by using cvsup. > >When I run "make buildworld", I got these errors. Are there packages missing? > >-------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) >-------------------------------------------------------------- >rm -f .depend >mkdep -f .depend -a -I/usr/src/usr.bin/make -DOLD_JOKE=1 >-DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200408120\" -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -DDEFSHELLNAME=\"sh\" >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/buf.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/hash_tables.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/lst.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/proc.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/shell.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/arch.c:107: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/cond.c:59: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/dir.c:97: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/for.c:55: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/job.c:131: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/main.c:82: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/make.c:80: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/parse.c:86: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/str.c:49: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/suff.c:102: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/targ.c:84: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/util.c:59: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >In file included from /usr/src/usr.bin/make/var.c:96: >/usr/src/usr.bin/make/globals.h:49: stdint.h: No such file or directory >mkdep: compile failed >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/make. >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/src. >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/src. > > > >Simon I have upgraded from 4.11 to 5.X, then from 5.X to 6.x, then from 6.X to 7.0. I don't think you can jump major versions as too much changes with each major version. You could download the ISO's and do binary upgrades to the major versions which would be faster. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 15:47:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBBE1065682 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386928FC2B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613A3F61AA for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:47:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0343F619F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:47:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:48:32 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080305 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:47:31 -0000 Hi, I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like a copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) nominated, but I really did not find one! In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say they ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, ftpmirror and ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to be useful. I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my ISP, I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the very end, I noticed the key-piece was missing! -- Cheers, Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 16:10:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF2110656E9 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukejee@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18458FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukejee@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so748782anc.13 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:content-transfer-encoding:date:cc; bh=1HS1JIasFm1vp1o+IzBSJBJw4izvyzabX7agSct2M5c=; b=r0Q3TTCBjiQMG7vwDQL48SDOKDbtEe6uxrmrVarnLpkX02N8DC54uhPyEZWecDqvoKhEY0CRi+QzC5p373MKE4PajqVojZW/EVhEUyV9fV93t563jUvEq78TAzOvW3LobRWaVt5+LBoR+Ia0gzW3U6k1ASeRiNVyH5/MY78rsYI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:x-mailer:mime-version:subject:content-transfer-encoding:date:cc; b=KinS31J3JI6Q9XRjCDJsMq/G1QU04Ft0LCpnurgoLqBggxPzZZRyV6OzTKgZKsdkLn7GfFRWpYEt2o1H67UurW+eoYnfh/YvnCwU+XaVylc3gejgvUjaliFdlQdpneOQm1kS4YNYhsyIP1sKC079IoKyPDumqXcUrffz+5MAR24= Received: by 10.100.13.2 with SMTP id 2mr13588223anm.29.1205251841829; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.184? ( [218.90.29.236]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm16890121ana.5.2008.03.11.09.10.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:10:40 -0700 (PDT) References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> Message-Id: <800975D5-00C9-48E0-8552-0A6321044BCD@gmail.com> From: Luke Jee To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl_Gr=C3=BCnewald?= In-Reply-To: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (4A93) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 4A93) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:10:23 +0800 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:10:43 -0000 Try rsync Luke Jee Prevantage Inc. On 2008-3-11, at =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=8811:48, Micha=C3=ABl Gr=C3=BCnewald = wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like =20= > a copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) =20 > nominated, but I really did not find one! > > In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say =20 > they ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, =20= > ftpmirror and ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to =20= > be useful. > > > I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my =20 > ISP, I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the =20 > very end, I noticed the key-piece was missing! > --=20 > Cheers, > Micha=C3=ABl > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=20 > " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 16:20:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC6E1065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17D18FC21 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CA61CCAC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:20:49 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:20:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803111720.48636.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:20:51 -0000 On Tuesday 11 March 2008 16:48:32 Micha=EBl Gr=FCnewald wrote: > I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my ISP, > I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the very end, I > noticed the key-piece was missing! If you use KDEwebdev (formerly Quanta), define a project and you will have = the=20 option to publish it to remote site, which will do exactly what you want. =2D-=20 Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 16:22:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF42D1065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [206.29.77.83]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B16B8FC17 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:22:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4526C5DDE5B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:03:30 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at honeypot.net Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPKriwINaV9u for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:03:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [10.45.12.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0561E5F0CA8 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:24:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:24:51 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <47D4E766.6060005@p6m7g8.com> <47D4EC0C.9010300@otenet.gr> <47D4F25F.5050109@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <47D4F25F.5050109@p6m7g8.com> X-Face: T+/_{qmjgbosI0J/e83I~w[&VF'w)!((xEpj///^bA/6?jHHS?nq+T8_+`nh"WnEWCWG, \}]Y2$)) =?utf-8?q?vLVz4ACChrEcb=7DCO=5EtYmMG=5C=0A=09ts=2Em=3F=5B7=5B6OwE*dAJ*9f+m?= =?utf-8?q?X=2E7R32qeN=5EDJ=5C?=(k@evW?IRQCy.^ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3925195.Fu8P5Yvnhz"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803110924.55142.kirk@strauser.com> Subject: Re: atacontrol mode D PIO4 persist across reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:22:58 -0000 --nextPart3925195.Fu8P5Yvnhz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 10 March 2008, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > This sets it for all controllers I only want to set it for ata1 which > contains ad2. Thanks for the tip though. Globally disable it on boot, then write a script named /etc/rc.local that=20 selectively re-enables it for certain drives. Here's mine: =2D--------- #!/bin/sh echo echo 'Setting controllers to DMA mode' atacontrol mode acd1 udma33 =2D--------- I had to do that because my DVD-ROM would autodetect UDMA66 or higher and=20 hang. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart3925195.Fu8P5Yvnhz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBH1pY35sRg+Y0CpvERAoByAJ0di4MnRZWxDbDGvBnhSgOLJa6NpQCdHf6F H6jfyl5YMwvFcs7t3BsnabQ= =wMGB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3925195.Fu8P5Yvnhz-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 16:27:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B00106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.ross@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FF1F8FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.ross@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2008 16:27:07 -0000 Received: from e176157073.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO [192.168.20.80]) [85.176.157.73] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 17:27:07 +0100 X-Authenticated: #11429267 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18YZrwUtnAY8rinePNBK39Dfdi8S5docOGN1y/3/s UhBBmdbSN6rBtI Message-ID: <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:27:07 +0100 From: Michael Ross User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> In-Reply-To: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:27:10 -0000 Michal Grnewald schrieb: > Hi, > > I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like a > copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) nominated, > but I really did not find one! > > In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say they > ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, ftpmirror > and ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to be useful. > > > I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my ISP, > I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the very end, I > noticed the key-piece was missing! I usually do it with lftp, in a script like: [michael@serafina ~]$ cat work/websites/foobar/lftp.upload #!/usr/local/bin/lftp -f debug 3; set dns:fatal-timeout 30; set ftp:ssl-allow true; open -u username,password host; put upload/updating.php -o /index.php || exit 1 mirror --verbose=1 --parallel=1 --delete --reverse \ --exclude ".htaccess" --exclude ".htpasswd" \ --exclude "index.php" --exclude "updating.php" \ upload / || exit 1 put upload/index.php -o /index.php || exit 1 Then I'll call ./lftp.upload and be done. Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 16:35:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C471065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494558FC13 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 26411 invoked by uid 0); 11 Mar 2008 16:35:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp5.knology.net with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 16:35:03 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id E029C2840A; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:35:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:35:02 -0500 From: David Kelly To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20080311163502.GA85603@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <800975D5-00C9-48E0-8552-0A6321044BCD@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <800975D5-00C9-48E0-8552-0A6321044BCD@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Micha??l Gr??newald Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:35:05 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:10:23AM +0800, Luke Jee top-posted: > Try rsync [...] > >I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like > >a copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) > >nominated, but I really did not find one! rsync isn't going to work unless one has more control over the http server than one usually gets. Must install rsync on each end. If one has that much control then I'd say use svn or cvs to keep the website in sync. You need version control anyway, might as well use it as your synchronization utility. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 16:51:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C368B1065674 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5948FC22 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2DF3F6260; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:51:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB2F3F615B; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:51:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D6B8C9.70400@laposte.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:52:25 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080305 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Ross References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:51:29 -0000 Michael Ross a crit : > Michal Grnewald schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like a >> copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) >> nominated, but I really did not find one! >> >> In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say they >> ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, >> ftpmirror and ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to >> be useful. >> >> >> I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my >> ISP, I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the very >> end, I noticed the key-piece was missing! > > I usually do it with lftp, in a script like: > > [michael@serafina ~]$ cat work/websites/foobar/lftp.upload > #!/usr/local/bin/lftp -f > debug 3; > > set dns:fatal-timeout 30; > > set ftp:ssl-allow true; > > open -u username,password host; > > put upload/updating.php -o /index.php || exit 1 > > mirror --verbose=1 --parallel=1 --delete --reverse \ > --exclude ".htaccess" --exclude ".htpasswd" \ > --exclude "index.php" --exclude "updating.php" \ > upload / || exit 1 > > put upload/index.php -o /index.php || exit 1 > > > Then I'll call ./lftp.upload and be done. I like this way, thank you, -- Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 17:20:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1EC1065674 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelvin@zednought.net) Received: from exedra.zednought.net (cpc2-cbly3-0-0-cust101.glfd.cable.ntl.com [86.13.152.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CDE8FC14 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelvin@zednought.net) Received: from webmail.zednought.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exedra.zednought.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088BB5C78 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:49:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 204.104.55.243 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kelvin) by webmail.zednought.net with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:49:03 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> In-Reply-To: <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:49:03 -0000 (GMT) From: "Kelvin Woods" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:20:19 -0000 On Tue, March 11, 2008 16:27, Michael Ross wrote: > Michal Grnewald schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like >> a >> copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) >> nominated, >> but I really did not find one! >> >> In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say >> they >> ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, >> ftpmirror >> and ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to be >> useful. >> >> >> I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my >> ISP, >> I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the very >> end, I >> noticed the key-piece was missing! > > I usually do it with lftp, in a script like: > > [michael@serafina ~]$ cat work/websites/foobar/lftp.upload > #!/usr/local/bin/lftp -f > debug 3; > > set dns:fatal-timeout 30; > > set ftp:ssl-allow true; > > open -u username,password host; > > put upload/updating.php -o /index.php || exit 1 > > mirror --verbose=1 --parallel=1 --delete --reverse \ > --exclude ".htaccess" --exclude ".htpasswd" \ > --exclude "index.php" --exclude "updating.php" \ > upload / || exit 1 > > put upload/index.php -o /index.php || exit 1 > > > Then I'll call ./lftp.upload and be done. > > > Michael > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'd support this suggestion as well. Using lftp (from the ports tree) requires nothing more that an FTP server at the remote end (i.e. the ISP). It can "mirror" in both directions, i.e. client -> server and server -> client. -- Kelvin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 17:55:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0287F1065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anonymous@elisha.fastestserver.com) Received: from elisha.fastestserver.com (elisha.fastestserver.com [24.227.88.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CF48FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anonymous@elisha.fastestserver.com) Received: (qmail 6113 invoked by uid 48); 11 Mar 2008 18:06:26 -0000 Date: 11 Mar 2008 18:06:26 -0000 Message-ID: <20080311180626.6112.qmail@24.227.88.70> To: questions@freebsd.org From: Abbey National Bank Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Alert : Update your Bank Account X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:55:07 -0000 Abbey _________________________________________________________________ Dear Customer During our regular scheduled, account maintenance and verification procedures we have detected a slight error in your billing information. 1. A recent change in your personal information ( i.e. change of address). 2. Submitting invalid information during the initial sign up process. 3. An inability to accurately verify your selected option of payment due to an internal error within our processors. You have 12 hours to confirm account information or your account will be blocked. To Get Started, Please Click On [1]http://www.abbey.co.uk/update/acc This email was sent by the Abbey Online server. This is done for your protection. Abbey National Society Security Advisor Abbey Bank. _________________________________________________________________ Please do not reply to this e-mail. Mail sent to this address cannot be answered. References 1. http://www.griffandjones.co.uk/includes/Abbey-online/Abbey-online/dert.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 17:59:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CB8106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4CB8FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:59:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BHvIPI001135; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:57:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BHvIgc001134; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:57:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:57:17 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: bsd Message-ID: <20080311175717.GI665@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <31276AFE-3326-40BC-8D1B-7CF3B6EC1B64@todoo.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <31276AFE-3326-40BC-8D1B-7CF3B6EC1B64@todoo.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Space needed on device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:59:42 -0000 On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:59:35PM +0100, bsd wrote: > Hello, > > After an update I have little space left on the / device > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ar0s1a 3.8G 3.1G 414M 88% / > devfs 1.0K 1.0K 0B 100% /dev > /dev/ar0s1d 60G 2.2G 53G 4% /home > > > I wanted to know if I can safely delete /usr/local/etc/cvsup/sup Probably but it might not help much. The big problem is that it looks like you have /var and /uar in root. Those can grow unexpectedly - especially /var when logs and mail grow. /usr can grow when you install ports. So, your best bet might be to move /var or /var/mail, /var/spool and /var/log to /home and make symlinks. You could also put /usr/src and /usr/ports in /home and make symlinks. That would give you lots of room and eliminate most unexpected growth. Really, it is also a good idea to have /tmp in its own partition as well for the same protection of unexpected growth issue. If you don't want to deal with moving thing and making symlinks (I do that a lot and it is easy) you could back everything up and then repartition and make file systems for /usr. /var and /tmp. ////jerry > > This beeing the default base for my previous kernel / system update > > > *default host=cvsup5.fr.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr/local/etc/cvsup > *default prefix=/usr > *default tag=RELENG_5_5 > *default release=cvs delete use-rel-suffix compress > src-all > > > > Are there any other file I should be removing ? > > Knowing that I have already removed /boot/kernel.old > > ? > > > > Thanks for your support. > > > > > Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD > bsd @at@ todoo.biz > > > P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing > this e-mail" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:12:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B93A1065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A218FC1A for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BIAJdA001185; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:10:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BIAHdU001184; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:10:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:10:17 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20080311181017.GJ665@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47CEDD64.4090100@ourweb.net> <20080305192330.S8517@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080305192330.S8517@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Bill Banks Subject: Re: starting a program at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:12:42 -0000 On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >how do i start a program at boot time? > > simplest to add to rc.local > > or as a user - add > > @reboot command > in crontab Not really. The more proper way is to add a startup script in /usr/local/rc.d/ There are notes and documentation for that and some samples. ////jerry > > > >-- > >----------------------------------------------- > >Bill Banks 508-829-2005 > >Wachusett Programming Ourweb > >http://www.ourweb.net > >http://www.ourwebtemplates.com > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:18:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F96C106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B908FC1E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:18:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BIIIeU001989; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:18:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2BIHvAc001984; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:18:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:17:57 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= In-Reply-To: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> Message-ID: <20080311191748.J1974@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1769294756-1205259477=:1974" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:18:56 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-1769294756-1205259477=:1974 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT > > I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like a copy of > a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) nominated, but I really mirror -R in lftp > did not find one! > > In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say they > ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, ftpmirror and > ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to be useful. > > > I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my ISP, I am > writing a script that automates publication, and at the very end, I noticed > the key-piece was missing! > -- > Cheers, > Michal > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --0-1769294756-1205259477=:1974-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:19:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438E91065677 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:19:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eagletree@hughes.net) Received: from n120.sc0.he.tucows.com (smtpout1077.sc0.he.tucows.com [64.97.144.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1976A8FC24 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eagletree@hughes.net) Received: from sc0-out06.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.131.2) by n120.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 476BFC8101223285 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:55:39 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2, 0, 0, e94432dd8b101f2f, 92445a3070131dd0, eagletree@hughes.net, -, RULES_HIT:355:379:481:541:564:966:967:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1766:1792:2196:2199:2393:2525:2559:2563:2682:2685:2857:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3350:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:4250:4362:4385:5007:7652:7679, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian: 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:none, DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from [192.168.0.3] (dpc6744118153.direcpc.com [67.44.118.153]) (Authenticated sender: eagletree@hughes.net) by sc0-out06.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chris Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:45:52 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Subject: ipfw, if_bridge and diverting for snort X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snagit@cbpratt.prohosting.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:19:51 -0000 Hello, I read Nick Rogness' helpful article on using snort-inline with ipfw. It mentions that diverting to a snort process can't be done with bridging because of "interaction of DIVERT sockets and bridging in the kernel". The article is not dated and it made me wonder if this is referring to the previous bridge capability rather than the newer if_bridge. I'm using if_bridge in my implementation. The question is, is it still a problem to divert to snort-inline from ipfw when using if_bridge? Thanks, Chris Ref: http://freebsd.rogness.net/snort-inline 5th paragraph entitled "BEFORE YOU START" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:21:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C7F106571F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20F68FC24 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:21:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99482EBC0C; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:21:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:21:25 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <20080311142125.1dc6b386.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080311181017.GJ665@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47CEDD64.4090100@ourweb.net> <20080305192330.S8517@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080311181017.GJ665@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , FreeBSD Questions , Bill Banks Subject: Re: starting a program at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:21:28 -0000 In response to Jerry McAllister : > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >how do i start a program at boot time? > > > > simplest to add to rc.local > > > > or as a user - add > > > > @reboot command > > in crontab > > Not really. > > The more proper way is to add a startup script in /usr/local/rc.d/ Just for the sanity of the OP: that directory is /usr/local/etc/rc.d -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:24:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33CA106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264148FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2BI4LM2022274; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:04:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m2BI4LU0022271; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:04:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:04:21 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: Kelvin Woods In-Reply-To: <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> Message-ID: <20080311135549.K5563@fledge.watson.org> References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="621616949-1756029767-1205258661=:5563" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:04:21 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:24:50 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --621616949-1756029767-1205258661=:5563 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Kelvin Woods wrote: > On Tue, March 11, 2008 16:27, Michael Ross wrote: >> Micha=EBl Gr=FCnewald schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like a c= opy=20 >>> of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) nominated, but = I=20 >>> really did not find one! >>> >>> In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say they= =20 >>> ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, ftpmirro= r and=20 >>> ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to be useful. >>> >>> >>> I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my ISP,= I am=20 >>> writing a script that automates publication, and at the very end, I >>> noticed the key-piece was missing! >> >> I usually do it with lftp, in a script like: >> >> [michael@serafina ~]$ cat work/websites/foobar/lftp.upload >> #!/usr/local/bin/lftp -f >> debug 3; >> set dns:fatal-timeout 30; >> set ftp:ssl-allow true; >> open -u username,password host; >> put upload/updating.php -o /index.php || exit 1 >> mirror --verbose=3D1 --parallel=3D1 --delete --reverse \ >> --exclude ".htaccess" --exclude ".htpasswd" \ >> --exclude "index.php" --exclude "updating.php" \ >> upload / || exit 1 >> put upload/index.php -o /index.php || exit 1 >> >> Then I'll call ./lftp.upload and be done. >> >> Michael >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > I'd support this suggestion as well. Using lftp (from the ports tree) > requires nothing more that an FTP server at the remote end (i.e. the > ISP). It can "mirror" in both directions, i.e. client -> server and > server -> client. > lftp is neat and new (to me). It reminds me of the advice given by Evi Neme= th=20 gave in the first Unix book I read some years ago, paraphrased as, "look at= all=20 the man pages every so often". If the ISP supports ssh, putting a key on the server allows easy update for= a=20 few files: scp [-r] [path-to-file/]newfile.html id@isp.server.com:/path-to-html/ --621616949-1756029767-1205258661=:5563-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:35:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC02F1065679 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755008FC25 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BIZKR4002131; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:35:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2BIZ4N3002125; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:35:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:35:04 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: doug@safeport.com In-Reply-To: <20080311135549.K5563@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20080311193455.T2100@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> <20080311135549.K5563@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kelvin Woods , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:35:50 -0000 > all the man pages every so often". > > If the ISP supports ssh, putting a key on the server allows easy update for a > few files: > > scp [-r] [path-to-file/]newfile.html id@isp.server.com:/path-to-html/ > for more use rsync -e "ssh -C" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:42:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF9E106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [74.1.12.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C03A8FC1B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 16381 invoked by uid 1008); 11 Mar 2008 18:47:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kalins-macbook-pro.local) (kalin@el.net@74.1.12.115) by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 11 Mar 2008 18:47:43 -0000 Message-ID: <47D6D277.40806@el.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:41:59 -0400 From: kalin m User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tamouh H." References: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> <283601c88322$b4ba8af0$6900a8c0@tamouh> In-Reply-To: <283601c88322$b4ba8af0$6900a8c0@tamouh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:02 -0000 thanks.... i did install the system now on ar0. the dmesg output below didn't change. the df does show only one drive - ar0 - with a few slices... assuming now that i have RAID1 working is there any way to monitor disks individually? or as an array? how can i be sure that the RAID is actually working? or get any stats? i figured the driver for the must be iir. bit from the iir man page ther is not much about monitoring or status... thanks... Tamouh H. wrote: >> hi ... >> >> i have a simple RAID question(s). >> >> this is from the dmesg of a newly installed bsd7: >> >> ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 >> ad6: 238475MB at ata3-master SATA150 >> ar0: 238472MB status: READY >> ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master >> ar0: disk1 READY (mirror) using ad6 at ata3-master >> >> from what i understand here is that if at the time of >> installation i install the system on ar0 that means i'd have >> RAID1 made out of ad4 and ad6. >> right? >> is there any configuration to be done? >> how do i know what driver is being used? it says: >> hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Feb 24 2008 >> 19:59:27) ............................................. >> hptrr: no controller detected.' >> >> >> that's it. thanks. >> >> >> >> >> > > It is saying "ar0: 238472MB status: READY" > > So assume it is onboard Intel RAID. When configuring FBSD setup, just make sure you're selecting the ar0 controller and partition it as you like. That is it! > > Tamouh > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:42:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464181065676 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCB98FC2F for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2BIgXod024570; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:42:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m2BIgWh0024566; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:42:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:42:32 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com X-X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20080311193455.T2100@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Message-ID: <20080311144112.X5563@fledge.watson.org> References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> <20080311135549.K5563@fledge.watson.org> <20080311193455.T2100@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:42:33 -0500 (EST) Cc: Kelvin Woods , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@fledge.watson.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:42:35 -0000 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> all the man pages every so often". >> >> If the ISP supports ssh, putting a key on the server allows easy update for >> a few files: >> >> scp [-r] [path-to-file/]newfile.html id@isp.server.com:/path-to-html/ >> > for more use rsync -e "ssh -C" As pointed out earlier in this thread, the use of rsync may require some assistance by the ISP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:43:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00421065678 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC1C8FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39011CE83; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:43:18 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:43:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803111943.17922.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Colin Brace Subject: Re: portupgrade can't fetch packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:43:19 -0000 On Monday 10 March 2008 15:38:17 Colin Brace wrote: > Hi all, > > Earlier today I ran "portupgrade -aP" to update my system. Alas, > everytime it tried to download a package, it failed and resorted to > downloading and compiling the source. For example: > > [...] > ---> Checking for the latest package of 'lang/python25' > ---> Fetching the package(s) for 'python25-2.5.2_1' (lang/python25) > ---> Fetching python25-2.5.2_1 > fetch: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7-stable/All/python25 >-2.5.2_1.tbz: Can't open data connection If this is a persistent rather then temporary problem, the only way I can see that happening, is that you have FTP_PASSIVE_MODE set to 'no' in pkgtools.conf. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 18:57:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E3C1065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652998FC18 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED77B3F6342; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:57:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A407F3F62A1; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:57:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D6D649.9070101@laposte.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:58:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080305 SeaMonkey/1.1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kelvin Woods References: <47D6A9D0.9050308@laposte.net> <47D6B2DB.5000308@gmx.net> <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> In-Reply-To: <5920.204.104.55.243.1205254143.squirrel@webmail.zednought.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for a FTP sync'er suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:57:40 -0000 Kelvin Woods a crit : > On Tue, March 11, 2008 16:27, Michael Ross wrote: >> Michal Grnewald schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am looking for a program able to make a remote FTP site look like >>> a >>> copy of a local dir. I feel as if I were dunce-cap-awards(R) >>> nominated, >>> but I really did not find one! >>> >>> In ports/ftp many programs say they do the reverse, and a few say >>> they >>> ``mirror'' without more explanation. I gave a tried to mirror, >>> ftpmirror >>> and ftpsync (among others), all of them broke or failed to be >>> useful. >>> >>> >>> I need this to publish a web site on a space allocated to me by my >>> ISP, >>> I am writing a script that automates publication, and at the very >>> end, I >>> noticed the key-piece was missing! >> I usually do it with lftp, in a script like: > > I'd support this suggestion as well. Using lftp (from the ports tree) > requires nothing more that an FTP server at the remote end (i.e. the > ISP). It can "mirror" in both directions, i.e. client -> server and > server -> client. I just tried LFTP, and this is a program I missed several times before, thank you to point it to me! -- Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 19:03:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B661065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8498FC17 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BJ1Vx1001614; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:01:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BJ1UxR001613; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:01:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:01:30 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Kent Hauser Message-ID: <20080311190130.GB1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <6004effe0803101322h3501ec70pee102901eefebfc2@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6004effe0803101322h3501ec70pee102901eefebfc2@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA Tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:03:54 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:22:09AM -1000, Kent Hauser wrote: > Hi, > > I need to replace a failed DAT72 drive. My current one is SCSI, but I'd like > to use a SATA replacement. Will this work? I have never seen a DAT drive on a SATA controller. Do they make them? ////jerry > > Thanks. Kent > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 19:09:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270811065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:09:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF56D8FC1B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:09:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BJ6kNs001643; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:06:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BJ6kdo001642; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:06:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:06:46 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Brian Minard Message-ID: <20080311190646.GC1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble Rescuing a System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:09:11 -0000 On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 07:25:35PM -0400, Brian Minard wrote: > I am trying to use the Fixit shell from FreeBSD 6.1 STABLE to rescue a > system running 7.0 STABLE. The problem is that I can't make the root > partition (i.e., "/") for the hard disk writable. I can mount other > partitions on the hard disks as writable. The hard disks contain a > mirrored GEOM file system. In creating the GEOM mirror I mapped > /dev/da0 to /dev/mirror/gm0 and then mirrored gm0 on /dev/da1. (All of > the GEOM configuration was done under 6.1 and the system was recently > upgraded to 7.0). > > The fstab I created in the Fixit shell contains the following lines: > > /dev/da0s1a /mnt/root ufs ro 0 > /dev/da0s1d /mnt/var ufs rw 0 Well, when you have it marked as 'ro' as in the line above, it will be mounted read only. Try changing that to 'rw' Make sure it is not already mounted. Do: mount -u /mnt/root ////jerry > > Fixit# mount /mnt/root > Fixit# mount -u -w /mnt/root > mount: /dev/da0s1a: Operation not permitted. > > Mounting the /var file system works as expected. > > What can I do to make /mnt/root a writable file system? > > Thanks, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 19:15:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23ADC1065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D178A8FC29 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BJD4HY001685; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:13:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BJD4dY001684; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:13:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:13:04 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20080311191304.GD1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47CEDD64.4090100@ourweb.net> <20080305192330.S8517@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080311181017.GJ665@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080311142125.1dc6b386.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080311142125.1dc6b386.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister , Wojciech Puchar , FreeBSD Questions , Bill Banks Subject: Re: starting a program at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:15:28 -0000 On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 02:21:25PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Jerry McAllister : > > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > > >how do i start a program at boot time? > > > > > > simplest to add to rc.local > > > > > > or as a user - add > > > > > > @reboot command > > > in crontab > > > > Not really. > > > > The more proper way is to add a startup script in /usr/local/rc.d/ > > Just for the sanity of the OP: that directory is /usr/local/etc/rc.d Oops. Sorry, you are right. I apparently dozed off while typing it. It is: /usr/local/etc/rc.d ////jerry > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 19:18:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611281065672 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:18:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDCD8FC12 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:17:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BJH8rA002278; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:17:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2BJGcEg002275; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:16:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:16:38 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20080311190130.GB1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: <20080311201627.T2250@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <6004effe0803101322h3501ec70pee102901eefebfc2@mail.gmail.com> <20080311190130.GB1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Kent Hauser Subject: Re: SATA Tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:18:08 -0000 >> to use a SATA replacement. Will this work? > > I have never seen a DAT drive on a SATA controller. > Do they make them? i found only SCSI and USB in Poland. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 19:25:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB751065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kent@khauser.net) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0C78FC15 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kent@khauser.net) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2939519waf.3 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.144.1 with SMTP id r1mr5346242wad.135.1205263503740; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.15.6 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6004effe0803111225i1132ba3ex200bd0f519024da4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:25:03 -1000 From: "Kent Hauser" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080311190130.GB1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6004effe0803101322h3501ec70pee102901eefebfc2@mail.gmail.com> <20080311190130.GB1531@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: SATA Tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:25:04 -0000 On the quantum web site, the internal DAT72 drives are choice of SATA, USB, or SCSI. SATA listed first. The SATA drive part # is CD72SH-SB. I'd love to not have to use the internal SCSI cabling for replacement. But of course, I'd also like it to work. Hence the query. Kent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 19:52:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4264C1065672 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g7mjv@btinternet.com) Received: from smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9CF58FC2C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g7mjv@btinternet.com) Received: (qmail 24688 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2008 19:25:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=V8tnZjrmqA8Y/d9MJxbWIXQ31tecBpInG4Am1A5WrSzsVhQFEkVEwpMqlKs5+cbXu0/hUwWDulIgqKaHFPUYMCgIIvNsQ0aDxoQftU683j2lPd+e7CRB+roXalR6myWjROYNzuPOXs8c+QMKCkrOXseDwx22+CX63mdr3VYf01Q= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.4?) (g7mjv@btinternet.com@81.132.103.92 with plain) by smtp802.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 19:25:32 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: akpEr0UVM1mqJ2qEI526al9AYdcID1FzjC85FWMf2isIcLclY65qDHZNWWe7CxPZ4cnB9fffIUZ7Mp_9TX87qnImb5PQJTZ5DA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:25:31 +0000 From: Andy Watts User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: newbie internet connection question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:52:14 -0000 Hi People l downloaded FreeBSD 6.3 the other day out of curiosity.. The installation started ok but it all went wrong when it came to connecting to the internet through my wired router http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-post.html l'm really not sure what entries to put in fig 2-29 that will allow my connection. My email address is g7mjv@btinternet.com My router's address is 192.168.1.1 and running ifconfig on my linux machine gives the following: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:6C:E2:58:25 inet addr:192.168.1.4 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::201:6cff:fee2:5825/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:5894 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4431375 (4.2 MB) TX bytes:616025 (601.5 KB) Interrupt:20 Base address:0xe400 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:5380 (5.2 KB) TX bytes:5380 (5.2 KB) Any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated Andy - Salisbury, UK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 20:02:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53526106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3734F8FC1E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd65257.utdallas.edu (utd65257.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDCA65501 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:02:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:02:18 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> References: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: newbie internet connection question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:02:19 -0000 --On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 19:25:31 +0000 Andy Watts wrote: > Hi People > > l downloaded FreeBSD 6.3 the other day out of curiosity.. > > The installation started ok but it all went wrong when it came to connecting > to the internet through my wired router > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-post.html > > l'm really not sure what entries to put in fig 2-29 that will allow my > connection. > > My email address is g7mjv@btinternet.com > > My router's address is 192.168.1.1 and running ifconfig on my linux machine > gives the following: > > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:6C:E2:58:25 inet > addr:192.168.1.4 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::201:6cff:fee2:5825/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:5894 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:4645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:4431375 (4.2 MB) TX bytes:616025 (601.5 KB) > Interrupt:20 Base address:0xe400 > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 > Mask:255.0.0.0 > inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:5380 (5.2 KB) TX bytes:5380 (5.2 KB) > > Any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated > If your router works like most do (and it appears that it does from the IP your linux box is getting), all you need to do is put this into /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_em0="DHCP" (or rerun sysinstall and configure your ethernet card to do dhcp.) # sysinstall Choose Configure/Networking/Interfaces and set your NIC to do dhcp. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 20:08:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5661065671 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DFB8FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) id m2BK84SU054335; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:08:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:08:04 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: kalin m Message-ID: <20080311200804.GA34485@dan.emsphone.com> References: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> <283601c88322$b4ba8af0$6900a8c0@tamouh> <47D6D277.40806@el.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D6D277.40806@el.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: "Tamouh H." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:07 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 11), kalin m said: > thanks.... > i did install the system now on ar0. the dmesg output below didn't change. > the df does show only one drive - ar0 - with a few slices... > assuming now that i have RAID1 working is there any way to monitor disks > individually? or as an array? > how can i be sure that the RAID is actually working? or get any stats? > i figured the driver for the must be iir. bit from > the iir man page ther is not much about monitoring or status... MatrixRAID is one of those not-really-raid controllers that only provides RAID during the boot process, and the OS has to implement RAID in software itself. FreeBSD has an ataraid driver to handle these cards. The atacontrol command lets you view status. See the ataraid and atacontrol manpages for more info. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 20:08:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5E0106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apache@www.kapalua.com) Received: from www.kapalua.com (kapalua.maui.net [64.29.76.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E7A8FC1B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from apache@www.kapalua.com) Received: by www.kapalua.com (Postfix, from userid 48) id F31CE6C07E; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:10:46 -1000 (HST) To: questions@freebsd.org From: Mr M Shadol MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20080311181046.F31CE6C07E@www.kapalua.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:10:46 -1000 (HST) Cc: Subject: Fidelity Investments International X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: m4shadol11@yahoo.es List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:08:32 -0000 Fidelity Investments International Oakhill house,130 Tonbridge, Hildenborough. Kent TN119DZ, United Kingdom. www.fidelity-international.com Attn: I am Mr. Micheal Shadol ,The Fund Manager of Fidelity Investment International. The World Largest Fund Management Company with over 1.2 Trillion Capital Investment Fund. Neverthless, as The Fidelity Fund Manager, I handle all our Investor's Direct Capital Funds and secretly extracted 1.2% Excess Maximum Return Capital Profit (EMRCP) per annum on each of the Investor's Marginal Capital Fund. As an expert,I have made over 25, 745, 000, 00 from the Investor's EMRCP and hereby looking for someone to trust who will stand as an Investor to receive the fund as Annual Investment Proceeds from Fidelity Marginal Capital Fund.All confirmable documents to back up the claims will be made available to you prior to your acceptance.Meanwhile, I have worked out the modalities and technincalities whereby the funds can be claimed in any of our 6 Clearing Houses without any hitches. If you are interested,you should send your direct phone number so we could discuss more on phone as regard the transaction. N:B; Do not contact my office number or email for any reason,mainly for security purposes, all correspondence must be through this private box. Sincerely. Mr Shadol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 20:14:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0B5106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8A68FC13 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BKE995093739; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:14:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 251CCB82A; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:14:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:14:09 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Andy Watts Message-ID: <20080311201408.GA90714@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Andy Watts , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbie internet connection question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:14:12 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 07:25:31PM +0000, Andy Watts wrote: > l downloaded FreeBSD 6.3 the other day out of curiosity.. >=20 > The installation started ok but it all went wrong when it came to=20 > connecting to the internet through my wired router >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-post.ht= ml You're reading the handbook. That's a very good start. :-) =20 > l'm really not sure what entries to put in fig 2-29 that will allow my=20 > connection. Most routers will have a DHCP server running to hand out addresses and such. When it asks 'Do you want to try DHCP configuration of the interface?' Just say 'yes'. Use the IP address of your router as the gateway address. > My router's address is 192.168.1.1 and running ifconfig on my linux machi= ne=20 > gives the following: > Any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated If you don't know what network hardware you have, use alt-F4 to switch to a shell and give the command 'dmesg | grep Ethernet'. On my machine this gives; rl0: Ethernet address: 00:1e:23:2f:1b:g1 indicating that I have hardware using the rl(4) driver. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfW6BAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXEagCfW5Fuejm7Spp2oxPc4b6m1OVv phoAn1jk7727Tl/ld88CbN063lWViqC9 =HQsq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 20:45:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BDB106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from netuno.levier.com.br (netuno.levier.com.br [201.47.3.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9501F8FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:45:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from levier.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netuno.levier.com.br (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2BJo10a046644 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:45:12 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (levier.com.br) Received: from [192.168.32.172] (authenticated as lenzi) by levier.com.br (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 11 Mar 2008 20:45:11 -0000 From: sergio lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:45:05 -0300 Message-Id: <1205268305.52059.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: EVOLUTION SLOW START , a workaround X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:45:15 -0000 Hello all This week I have time to trace the problem with evolution that lasts too much time to start. The problem is that glib on function g_module_load, searchs for a symbol g_module_check_init, g_module_unload... by default. It occurs that the evolution code, that will be loaded, does not have those functions available... so th glib (and dlsym) tries to find the symbol in every load module in memory... and doing so consumes all cpu for several seconds, for each load module.... ! coded a solution for gmodule that tests for those special symbos, and if found, uses dlsymb(RTLD_NEXT,....) instead of dlsym(handler....) so it will search a much less modules, and evolution will start in 3 seconds... (20 times less...) Of course the correct strategy is to correct code evolution module (libevolution-mail.so). will do next time.... modified file: /usr/ports/devel/glib20/files/patch-gmodule::gmodule-dl.c please note this is only a temporary fix... the correct solution is to fix the evolution module.... ============================================= --- gmodule/gmodule-dl.c.orig 2008-02-07 03:24:53.000000000 -0200 +++ gmodule/gmodule-dl.c 2008-03-11 18:53:44.000000000 -0300 @@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ #endif /* RTLD_GLOBAL */ +static char *special_names[]={ + "g_module_check_init", + "g_module_unload", + "e_plugin_lib_enable", + NULL +}; + + /* --- functions --- */ static gchar* fetch_dlerror (gboolean replace_null) @@ -106,6 +114,7 @@ static gpointer _g_module_self (void) { +#ifndef __FreeBSD__ gpointer handle; /* to query symbols from the program itself, special link options @@ -117,6 +126,9 @@ g_module_set_error (fetch_dlerror (TRUE)); return handle; +#else + return RTLD_DEFAULT; +#endif } static void @@ -141,9 +153,19 @@ { gpointer p; gchar *msg; + char **pn; fetch_dlerror (FALSE); - p = dlsym (handle, symbol_name); + + for (pn=special_names;*pn;pn++) { + if (!strcmp(*pn,symbol_name)) { + p=dlsym(RTLD_NEXT,symbol_name); + break; + } + } + + if (! *pn) + p = dlsym (handle, symbol_name); msg = fetch_dlerror (FALSE); if (msg) g_module_set_error (msg); From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 21:15:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F37C1065672 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:15:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6D548FC23 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:15:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 55238 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Mar 2008 20:43:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=uD+vxAsBrq4FdXigFnTPCf9vTZOfY6DNhlT0zv4DUz5KZTJ1U9ccm9yGkXU+f61cxGugmhKYrM5xhPTSNqDbxz/bSdXGQxncDnkUmEk04h/wwa6nMAVf8T2I8vH750TgHxynEZqCsT7cL/U/pJqGo4CmrXYgjNat1aL/n6ekyf0=; X-YMail-OSG: ocoGwQoVM1nEZXTNSJLqV2a_YqZr1rAIeDM8Mk8W7qUwKh4orLPWSYFtnpj_co8ut.x2bm9Eyw-- Received: from [75.41.234.82] by web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:43:26 PDT Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:43:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Busby To: help help MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <347572.54335.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Tyan Motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:15:25 -0000 Looking to build a new server, looking for a dual amd 940 board with sata II support. I have googled, but still looking for a firm success before spending the money. Anyone have success with this Tyan board. Model S2892GNR North Bridge AMD 8131, South Bridge Nvidia nForce Prof. 2200 Other chipset Winbond W83627HF Super I/O ASIC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 22:08:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86329106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758798FC1A for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:08:45 -0700 Message-ID: <47D702EC.2090908@riderway.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:08:44 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Ridecharge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070919) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:08:46 -0000 Hi, I'm setting up a 'chrooted' SFTP only set of users: /etc/make.conf: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/usr/ports/security/openssh-portable*} WITH_SUID_SSH =yes WITH_OPENSSH_CHROOT =yes WITH_HPN =yes WITH_OVERWRITE_BASE =yes .endif /etc/rc.conf: sshd_enable="NO" openssh_enable="YES" /etc/passwd: user:*:3000:3000::0:0:F L:/foo/./user:/bin/sh Access will be with ssh dsa keys only. What is the best way to make this SFTP only and not SSH? 1).ssh/authorization? 2) change user's shell to /usr/local/libexec/sftp-server 3) change user's shell to a custom C wrapper around [2] 4) a combination of them -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 22:18:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4B41065673 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:18:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0F18FC24 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BMGAvj002464; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:16:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BMGAHe002463; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:16:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:16:10 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-ID: <20080311221610.GB2418@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D702EC.2090908@riderway.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D702EC.2090908@riderway.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:18:34 -0000 On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:08:44PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up a 'chrooted' SFTP only set of users: > > /etc/make.conf: > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/usr/ports/security/openssh-portable*} > WITH_SUID_SSH =yes > WITH_OPENSSH_CHROOT =yes > WITH_HPN =yes > WITH_OVERWRITE_BASE =yes > .endif > > /etc/rc.conf: > sshd_enable="NO" > openssh_enable="YES" > > /etc/passwd: > user:*:3000:3000::0:0:F L:/foo/./user:/bin/sh > > Access will be with ssh dsa keys only. > > What is the best way to make this SFTP only and not SSH? > 1).ssh/authorization? > 2) change user's shell to /usr/local/libexec/sftp-server > 3) change user's shell to a custom C wrapper around [2] > 4) a combination of them The usual thing is make the shell /bin/nologin ////jerry > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) > o:703.549.2050x206 > Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. > http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com > 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 22:26:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B1AF106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E568FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:26:52 -0700 Message-ID: <47D7072B.6090501@riderway.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:26:51 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Ridecharge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070919) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry McAllister References: <47D702EC.2090908@riderway.com> <20080311221610.GB2418@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080311221610.GB2418@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:26:53 -0000 >> user:*:3000:3000::0:0:F L:/foo/./user:/bin/sh > The usual thing is make the shell /bin/nologin Hi Jerry, Thanks -- but Changed to /usr/sbin/nologin So thats not in the 'chroot' aka /foo/user/usr/sbin/nologin $ sftp -v -v -v user@devX.domain.tld OpenSSH_4.5p1 FreeBSD-20061110, OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007 debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version OpenSSH_4.7p1-hpn12v20 FreeBSD-openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1-hpn12v20 FreeBSD-openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1 pat OpenSSH* debug2: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 32768 Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed on channel 0 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 22:51:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CC71065674 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi029.prodigy.net (nlpi029.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E698FC2E for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi029.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BMpWl3024195 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:51:34 -0500 Message-ID: <47D71B04.5000603@chrismaness.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:51:32 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Apache -- Analyzing core dump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:51:37 -0000 I used to analyze core dumps with tnos to debug. It has been a coon's age since I've done such. I am having apache crash and core dump. There isn't any error info in the log files. Where is the core dumped to (the main log tells me the core has been dumped)? How do I analyze this dump file to find out what went wrong? Do I have to compile apache with debug features turned on to do this? I am referring to my previous thread: apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 -- Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 23:24:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF481106566B for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from nlpi015.prodigy.net (nlpi015.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B098FC1D for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-ORBL: [76.238.148.150] Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-76-238-148-150.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.150]) by nlpi015.prodigy.net (8.13.8 out.dk.spool/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2BNOQAN004143 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:24:26 -0500 Message-ID: <47D722B6.5050200@chrismaness.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:24:22 -0700 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D71B04.5000603@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: <47D71B04.5000603@chrismaness.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Apache -- Analyzing core dump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:24:30 -0000 Chris Maness wrote: > I used to analyze core dumps with tnos to debug. It has been a coon's > age since I've done such. I am having apache crash and core dump. > There isn't any error info in the log files. > > Where is the core dumped to (the main log tells me the core has been > dumped)? > > How do I analyze this dump file to find out what went wrong? > > Do I have to compile apache with debug features turned on to do this? > > I am referring to my previous thread: > > apache+mod_ssl-1.3.41+2.8.31 crashing with mod_php5 > I was able to find my old e-mails on debugging tnos. I used gdb. Per the gdb man page I was able to figure out how to check the core file. Here is the output: GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `httpd'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypt.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypt.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libmm.so.14...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libmm.so.14 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7 Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mmap_static.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mmap_static.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_vhost_alias.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_vhost_alias.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_env.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_env.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_define.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_define.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_log_config.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_log_config.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mime_magic.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mime_magic.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mime.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_mime.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_negotiation.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_negotiation.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_status.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_status.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_info.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_info.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_include.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_include.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_autoindex.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_autoindex.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_dir.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_dir.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_cgi.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_cgi.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_asis.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_asis.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_imap.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_imap.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_actions.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_actions.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_speling.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_speling.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_userdir.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_userdir.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_alias.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_alias.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_rewrite.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_rewrite.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_access.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_access.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_auth.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_auth.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_auth_anon.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_auth_anon.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_auth_db.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_auth_db.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_digest.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_digest.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/libproxy.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/libproxy.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_cern_meta.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_cern_meta.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_expires.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_headers.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_headers.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_usertrack.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_usertrack.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_log_forensic.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_log_forensic.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_unique_id.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_unique_id.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_setenvif.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/mod_setenvif.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/libssl.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/libssl.so Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libssl.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libssl.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libcrypto.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libcrypto.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp5.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/libexec/apache/libphp5.so Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x28ccda00 in ?? () (gdb) quit ##################################################################################### Earlier this week I was having problems compiling gtk-2. The macro was complaining that I did not have ld-elf.so.1. The output of the script was: iqr.la im-multipress.la > gtk.immodules > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by > "libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0" > gmake[3]: *** [gtk.immodules] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.12.8/modules/input' > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.12.8/modules' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk20/work/gtk+-2.12.8' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade.13565.39 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade > UPGRADE_PORT=gtk-2.12.3 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.12.3 make BATCH=yes > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > ! x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.12.3) (new compiler error) looks like I am missing libm.so.4. If I do a locate libm.so.4 it turns up nothing. However, my FreeBSD 6.3 box has the library. I upgraded by compiling with everything set as default and GENERIC. What happened to libm.so.4? Is it possible that ld-elf.so.1 (the last library loaded) caused apache to crash because it could not find a library like when I was trying to compile gtk-2? Any suggestions? -- Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 23:30:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22F2106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [74.1.12.120]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EE08FC28 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 10235 invoked by uid 1008); 11 Mar 2008 23:36:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kalins-macbook-pro.local) (kalin@el.net@74.1.12.115) by mail.el.net with ESMTPA; 11 Mar 2008 23:36:15 -0000 Message-ID: <47D71617.1070103@el.net> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:30:31 -0400 From: kalin m User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> <283601c88322$b4ba8af0$6900a8c0@tamouh> <47D6D277.40806@el.net> <20080311200804.GA34485@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20080311200804.GA34485@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Tamouh H." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:30:32 -0000 thanks.... i read the atacontrol man. there is a part in there that says: .............. A quick and dirty way to create such a mirrored array (RAID1) on a new system is to boot off the FreeBSD install CD, do a minimal scratch install, abort out of the post install questions, and at the command line issue the com- mand: atacontrol create RAID1 ad4 ad6 then immediately issue a reboot and boot from the installation CD again, and during the installation, you will now see "ar0" listed as a disk to install on, and install on that instead of ad4, ad6, etc. ............. in my case the machine showed me the ar0 to install the system on it without doing this 'quick and dirty way'. and now i get: # atacontrol status ar0 ar0: ATA RAID1 status: READY subdisks: 0 ad4 ONLINE 1 ad6 ONLINE that tells me that i actually do have RAID1 active. which means it's a software one, correct? also if you do not mind please elaborate on "MatrixRAID is one of those not-really-raid controllers that onlyprovides RAID during the boot process..." thank you... Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Mar 11), kalin m said: > >> thanks.... >> i did install the system now on ar0. the dmesg output below didn't change. >> the df does show only one drive - ar0 - with a few slices... >> assuming now that i have RAID1 working is there any way to monitor disks >> individually? or as an array? >> how can i be sure that the RAID is actually working? or get any stats? >> i figured the driver for the must be iir. bit from >> the iir man page ther is not much about monitoring or status... >> > > MatrixRAID is one of those not-really-raid controllers that only > provides RAID during the boot process, and the OS has to implement RAID > in software itself. FreeBSD has an ataraid driver to handle these > cards. The atacontrol command lets you view status. See the ataraid > and atacontrol manpages for more info. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 23:46:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9F61065670 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009028FC16 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2BNlCCs003357; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:47:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2BNlBxd003356; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:47:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:47:11 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Philip M. Gollucci" Message-ID: <20080311234711.GA3306@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D702EC.2090908@riderway.com> <20080311221610.GB2418@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <47D7072B.6090501@riderway.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D7072B.6090501@riderway.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister , "Philip M. Gollucci" , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: security/openssh-portable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:46:50 -0000 On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:26:51PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > >>user:*:3000:3000::0:0:F L:/foo/./user:/bin/sh > >The usual thing is make the shell /bin/nologin > Hi Jerry, Thanks -- but > Changed to /usr/sbin/nologin > > So thats not in the 'chroot' aka /foo/user/usr/sbin/nologin Well, you can make your own nologin. Just copy the other one and make it only executable - not writable. ////jerry > $ sftp -v -v -v user@devX.domain.tld > OpenSSH_4.5p1 FreeBSD-20061110, OpenSSL 0.9.8e 23 Feb 2007 > debug1: Remote protocol version 1.99, remote software version > OpenSSH_4.7p1-hpn12v20 FreeBSD-openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1 > debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.7p1-hpn12v20 > FreeBSD-openssh-portable-overwrite-base-4.7.p1_1,1 pat OpenSSH* > > debug2: channel 0: open confirm rwindow 0 rmax 32768 > Request for subsystem 'sftp' failed on channel 0 > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) > o:703.549.2050x206 > Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. > http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com > 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 23:54:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FB2106566C for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F36D8FC20 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from localhost (ool-44c03822.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.56.34]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with SMTP id <0JXL002AWBPUUBQ0@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:53:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:53:51 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" In-reply-to: <1205268305.52059.16.camel@localhost> To: sergio lenzi Message-id: <20080311195351.d427802d.ejcerejo@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <20080310231502.V7454@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1205268305.52059.16.camel@localhost> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EVOLUTION SLOW START , a workaround X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:54:02 -0000 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:45:05 -0300 sergio lenzi wrote: > Hello all > > This week I have time to trace the problem with evolution that > lasts too much time to start. > > The problem is that glib on function g_module_load, searchs for a symbol > g_module_check_init, g_module_unload... by default. > > It occurs that the evolution code, that will be loaded, does not have > those functions available... so th glib (and dlsym) tries to find the > symbol in every load module in memory... and doing so consumes all cpu > for several seconds, for each load module.... > > ! coded a solution for gmodule that tests for those special symbos, and > if found, uses dlsymb(RTLD_NEXT,....) instead of dlsym(handler....) > so it will search a much less modules, and evolution will start in 3 > seconds... (20 times less...) > > Of course the correct strategy is to correct code evolution module > (libevolution-mail.so). will do next time.... > > modified file: /usr/ports/devel/glib20/files/patch-gmodule::gmodule-dl.c > > please note this is only a temporary fix... the correct solution is to > fix the > evolution module.... > > ============================================= > --- gmodule/gmodule-dl.c.orig 2008-02-07 03:24:53.000000000 -0200 > +++ gmodule/gmodule-dl.c 2008-03-11 18:53:44.000000000 -0300 > @@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ > #endif /* RTLD_GLOBAL */ > > > +static char *special_names[]={ > + "g_module_check_init", > + "g_module_unload", > + "e_plugin_lib_enable", > + NULL > +}; > + > + > /* --- functions --- */ > static gchar* > fetch_dlerror (gboolean replace_null) > @@ -106,6 +114,7 @@ > static gpointer > _g_module_self (void) > { > +#ifndef __FreeBSD__ > gpointer handle; > > /* to query symbols from the program itself, special link options > @@ -117,6 +126,9 @@ > g_module_set_error (fetch_dlerror (TRUE)); > > return handle; > +#else > + return RTLD_DEFAULT; > +#endif > } > > static void > @@ -141,9 +153,19 @@ > { > gpointer p; > gchar *msg; > + char **pn; > > fetch_dlerror (FALSE); > - p = dlsym (handle, symbol_name); > + > + for (pn=special_names;*pn;pn++) { > + if (!strcmp(*pn,symbol_name)) { > + p=dlsym(RTLD_NEXT,symbol_name); > + break; > + } > + } > + > + if (! *pn) > + p = dlsym (handle, symbol_name); > msg = fetch_dlerror (FALSE); > if (msg) > g_module_set_error (msg); > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I stopped using gnome because of evolution and few other admin apps that don't work, it took about 80 seconds to open evolution so I got fed up with it and changed to xfce4, personally I think there's quite a few things broken with gnome, specially the admin part of it which is not a problem with KDE. Posted the problem a few times and all I've got was the freebsd loader spent quit a bit of time looking for every evolution plugin so I disabled them and it still took about 50 seconds to open which was unacceptable to me. Ubuntu on a slower machine only takes about 3 seconds with every plugin enabled so it was obvious to me that there was a bug somewhere. I hope they apply your fix to the gnome port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 00:15:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52F4106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A12D8FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so2620400wfa.7 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:15:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=9Tlpc/Q4MiE5ho1/mNOsqdRV8bLwijwHodwd6xRY3nE=; b=J5u74jtmkRUa73/umr7mnEDnMnAGJU9bWWsZ958B88SF284DP/vvWltingDFtzcIUyRZHFVqeyY38/+h9RytljBs8gkJGLE/vKpkHlVExQWHc1yi872MpEEtSnwb6tCEciDr/vD4l26ACGiQTiPlZsPzqZREApUUkuXkfUZMhm4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=AkZF3GBef+cqNyNPbXQ54fttPSp09fC9ZwRk/uiSbBqdbZNeK5w/S5gLR8RsgCcXRU5bEWL2ED2dgJ21TBDYpgdvJemmBW8wDWG8rWPr/fIeYYZ7LY6BwtMKFuHHkfN5JZs/qf5bs3an0+UN9GAXUzKMRIwDdbAYIhqy9jy3620= Received: by 10.142.241.10 with SMTP id o10mr3164709wfh.217.1205280952226; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.237.12 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:15:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90803111715g5fbbdd0cg4ce817ef72a8161d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:15:52 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "User Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: e0bbf42c6b2fe2a6 Subject: OT: how to get make to run a script before each build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:15:52 -0000 I'd like to keep track of how many times I've run make for a given source. I'm sure someone knows how to get make to run a script before doing anything else, but using the regular build rules (aka. only if a source file has changed). Of course typing any permutation of this question into google gives me 10^life of universe in microseconds hits. Thanks, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 00:46:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51DA1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829B18FC13 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDD81CCAC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:46:15 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, stevefranks@ieee.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:46:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <539c60b90803111715g5fbbdd0cg4ce817ef72a8161d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90803111715g5fbbdd0cg4ce817ef72a8161d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803120146.14003.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: OT: how to get make to run a script before each build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:16 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 01:15:52 Steve Franks wrote: > I'd like to keep track of how many times I've run make for a given > source. I'm sure someone knows how to get make to run a script before > doing anything else, but using the regular build rules (aka. only if a > source file has changed). Of course typing any permutation of this > question into google gives me 10^life of universe in microseconds > hits. mysource.c.o: count=`cat /var/db/makecounter.${.IMPSRC}` count=$$(($$count+1)) echo $$count >/var/db/makecounter.${.IMPSRC} ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -c ${.IMPSRC} or something to that effect, key being, change/override the compilation rule for your specific or all files. Default single/double suffix rules are in /usr/share/mk/sys.mk. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 00:46:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9BD1065686 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from ns.mahan.org (ns.mahan.org [67.116.10.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818628FC20 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from widowmaker.local (crowTrobot [67.116.10.140]) by ns.mahan.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2C0kjZe009831; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:46:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Message-ID: <47D727F0.8060002@mahan.org> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:46:40 -0700 From: Patrick Mahan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbie internet connection question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:46:41 -0000 Paul Schmehl presented these words - circa 3/11/08 1:02 PM-> > --On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 19:25:31 +0000 Andy Watts > wrote: > >> Hi People >> >> l downloaded FreeBSD 6.3 the other day out of curiosity.. >> >> The installation started ok but it all went wrong when it came to >> connecting >> to the internet through my wired router >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-post.html >> >> >> l'm really not sure what entries to put in fig 2-29 that will allow my >> connection. >> >> My email address is g7mjv@btinternet.com >> >> My router's address is 192.168.1.1 and running ifconfig on my linux >> machine >> gives the following: >> >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:6C:E2:58:25 inet >> addr:192.168.1.4 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 >> inet6 addr: fe80::201:6cff:fee2:5825/64 Scope:Link >> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 >> RX packets:5894 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:4645 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 >> RX bytes:4431375 (4.2 MB) TX bytes:616025 (601.5 KB) >> Interrupt:20 Base address:0xe400 >> >> lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 >> Mask:255.0.0.0 >> inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host >> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 >> RX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 >> TX packets:48 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 >> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 >> RX bytes:5380 (5.2 KB) TX bytes:5380 (5.2 KB) >> >> Any pointers in the right direction would be greatly appreciated >> > > If your router works like most do (and it appears that it does from the > IP your linux box is getting), all you need to do is put this into > /etc/rc.conf: > > ifconfig_em0="DHCP" > > (or rerun sysinstall and configure your ethernet card to do dhcp.) > > # sysinstall > > Choose Configure/Networking/Interfaces and set your NIC to do dhcp. > Hmmm, he doesn't need to select DHCP (or maybe he already has) since the interface (eth0) already has an assigned IP address on 192.168.1.0 network (192.168.1.4). Can you ping the router's IP address ('ping 192.168.1.1')? If so then you need to look at your router's external IP address (the one that is actually visible to the Internet via your ISP provided IP address). Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 00:52:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E9B106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:52:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558B68FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rodperson@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id zplm1Y00D0Fqzac540WU00; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:35:38 +0000 Received: from atomizer.opensourcebeef.net ([71.61.13.42]) by OMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 00cY1Z00B0uSFC73U00000; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:36:33 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=54lT7TNUG9NGINUDPgsA:9 a=Oa1kSK6bAdXqU67aWO_QCZGvt88A:4 a=ftFGBYpk1mUA:10 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:36:30 -0400 From: Rod Person To: Mark Busby Message-ID: <20080311203630.085f54d4@atomizer.opensourcebeef.net> In-Reply-To: <347572.54335.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <347572.54335.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: Open Source Beef X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Cc: help help Subject: Re: Tyan Motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 00:52:35 -0000 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkVEIE1FU1NBR0UtLS0tLQ0KSGFzaDogU0hBMQ0KDQpPbiBUdWUs IDExIE1hciAyMDA4IDEzOjQzOjI2IC0wNzAwIChQRFQpDQpNYXJrIEJ1c2J5IDxyZWR0aWNrQHNi Y2dsb2JhbC5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IExvb2tpbmcgdG8gYnVpbGQgYSBuZXcgc2VydmVyLCBs b29raW5nIGZvciBhIGR1YWwgYW1kIDk0MCBib2FyZCB3aXRoDQo+IHNhdGEgSUkgc3VwcG9ydC4g SSBoYXZlIGdvb2dsZWQsIGJ1dCBzdGlsbCBsb29raW5nIGZvciBhIGZpcm0gc3VjY2Vzcw0KPiBi ZWZvcmUgc3BlbmRpbmcgdGhlIG1vbmV5LiANCj4gICBBbnlvbmUgaGF2ZSBzdWNjZXNzIHdpdGgg dGhpcyBUeWFuIGJvYXJkLg0KPiAgIE1vZGVsIFMyODkyR05SIA0KPiAgIE5vcnRoIEJyaWRnZSBB TUQgODEzMSwgU291dGggQnJpZGdlIE52aWRpYSBuRm9yY2UgUHJvZi4gMjIwMA0KPiAgIE90aGVy IGNoaXBzZXQgV2luYm9uZCBXODM2MjdIRiBTdXBlciBJL08gQVNJQw0KDQpJIGhhdmUgdGhlIFR5 YW4gVGh1bmRlciBLOFdFIChTMjg5NSkgYW5kIGl0IHdvcmtzIGdyZWF0Lg0KDQotIC0tIA0KUm9k DQoJDQoiV2hlbiBDb2x1bWJ1cyBkaXNjb3ZlcmVkIEFtZXJjaWEsIHdoZXJlIHdlcmUgd2U/Ig0K ICAtSWduYWNpbyBFaywgTWF5YSwgMTk3MA0KLS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0N ClZlcnNpb246IEdudVBHIHYxLjQuOCAoRnJlZUJTRCkNCg0KaUVZRUFSRUNBQVlGQWtmWEpZNEFD Z2tRV3RGMDRYL2tQMzFGVHdDZ2hnS0UzNExpNEc2WURWclBCSHhvWlRkRw0KVUs4QW5qMXBEZWtz MlZQcEtwM3FKOEVGcklnVzZzZSsNCj1ZN29mDQotLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0N Cg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 01:10:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C341065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE24D8FC1A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:10:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16261CCAC; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:10:49 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:10:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> <47D727F0.8060002@mahan.org> In-Reply-To: <47D727F0.8060002@mahan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803120210.48526.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Paul Schmehl , Patrick Mahan Subject: Re: newbie internet connection question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:10:51 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 01:46:40 Patrick Mahan wrote: > Paul Schmehl presented these words - circa 3/11/08 1:02 PM-> > > > --On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 19:25:31 +0000 Andy Watts > > > > wrote: > >> My router's address is 192.168.1.1 and running ifconfig on my linux > >> machine > >> gives the following: > >> > >> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:6C:E2:58:25 inet > Hmmm, he doesn't need to select DHCP (or maybe he already has) since the > interface (eth0) See the problem with your statement? :p -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 02:48:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8FF106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrett714@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9478FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garrett714@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c49so1974889wra.19 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:48:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=vRBnGHjgD+/x13hZjSX4bEqC+qX3vVLYtoFoRGrIzmw=; b=upS32pUWQFUehjwgnU7JaMTXXO44zVwBgtu4w7Fc1vEEUnAcjLrri0mEihykJGqTr3qcUr1kAvLkJ/O8PSf7KYAPzbo7q5tbq2jDm5TtHXDrnvNEQJIr0TX83P/EA3UGvsjfjINMrmB++O0mBhrUX//Pa/V4Hi+ocV8PL3gS5jI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=pRj4fhOPpgBXw2k6CKFXNJ1gTxsOxbLhutCH/MJfknNEvCg2oixJUtO5m5ZndURXtNTf6Cb54w8XCfc11iQ6jW9SDYkuhEKlnI2QdJSmqJSovu2CcK4+HN2O8lbcweM76ART0D9MVQC8KQqfpRWGWJZktqrdbf+iaSbA9VasUug= Received: by 10.114.157.1 with SMTP id f1mr5975156wae.10.1205288585480; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.77.11 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5191ed200803111923u5f5d3265r5f4562bb23dce3fa@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:23:05 -0500 From: "Mike Garrett" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD 7 and SATA DVD Drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 02:48:47 -0000 Hello, does FreeBSD 7 support booting from SATA DVD drives? When I tried 6.2, it didn't work, and I was hoping it has been fixed by now. Thanks for any info, Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 03:05:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261E61065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:05:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfazio@n3gqf.us) Received: from QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B862D8FC19 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gfazio@n3gqf.us) Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 00ir1Z00b0QuhwU5708f00; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:04:48 +0000 Received: from mail.lunaticcafe.us ([76.117.76.193]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 035a1Z0034ADx4C3N00000; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:05:34 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=7L0P2s4tVbWkzkSPCyoA:9 a=Yk2Jx9WkxmSt__isu-QA:7 a=xljrMFbDdd_ypxJeRSmfDPmOhzYA:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=0dRpvnS4h04A:10 Received: from [10.42.69.30] (gf-xp3200.lunaticcafe.us [10.42.69.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: djdagan) by mail.lunaticcafe.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8C1C3F439; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:05:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47D748C6.9010804@n3gqf.us> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:06:46 -0400 From: George Fazio User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Garrett References: <5191ed200803111923u5f5d3265r5f4562bb23dce3fa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5191ed200803111923u5f5d3265r5f4562bb23dce3fa@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 and SATA DVD Drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:05:36 -0000 Mike Garrett wrote: > Hello, does FreeBSD 7 support booting from SATA DVD drives? When I tried > 6.2, it didn't work, and I was hoping it has been fixed by now. > > Thanks for any info, > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I just built a machine with 7.0R AMD64 and had no trouble booting from the Asus SATA DVD drive that was in it. The motherboard was an Intel P45GC - ICH7 chipset. George From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 05:55:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8944B106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from ns.mahan.org (ns.mahan.org [67.116.10.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC5C8FC12 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from widowmaker.local (crowTrobot [67.116.10.140]) by ns.mahan.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2C5thxt011631; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:55:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Message-ID: <47D77059.7090207@mahan.org> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:55:37 -0700 From: Patrick Mahan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <47D6DCAB.2000907@btinternet.com> <47D727F0.8060002@mahan.org> <200803120210.48526.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803120210.48526.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: newbie internet connection question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:55:38 -0000 Mel presented these words - circa 3/11/08 6:10 PM-> > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 01:46:40 Patrick Mahan wrote: >> Paul Schmehl presented these words - circa 3/11/08 1:02 PM-> >> >>> --On Tuesday, March 11, 2008 19:25:31 +0000 Andy Watts >>> >>> wrote: > > >>>> My router's address is 192.168.1.1 and running ifconfig on my linux >>>> machine >>>> gives the following: >>>> >>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:6C:E2:58:25 inet > >> Hmmm, he doesn't need to select DHCP (or maybe he already has) since the >> interface (eth0) > > See the problem with your statement? :p I see, the info is from his Linux box. So he either needs to ifconfig his interface on FreeBSD or enable DHCP to get it assigned. My bad, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 06:53:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9CE106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dajaasge@internode.on.net) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1F18FC1A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dajaasge@internode.on.net) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAEcV10d5LEw6/2dsb2JhbACpGA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,484,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="73617812" Received: from ppp121-44-76-58.lns10.syd6.internode.on.net (HELO athlon2000) ([121.44.76.58]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2008 17:07:45 +1030 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:37:25 +1100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: dajaasge Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.21 (Win32) Subject: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:53:04 -0000 Hi there As a relatively inexperienced user of FreeBSD I have little input to offer the community as a whole save to suggest that offering a DVD iso image from which to install would save the sometimes extreme tediousness of disc swapping when adding packages. If I knew more about it I would make such an image myself, however, having never had to do it before it is something I will have to pen in for a later time. Just a thought. Thanks, David. -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 08:30:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16880106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6C98FC2A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4776DBE855A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:29:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:29:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1205310589.6953.0.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: pf.conf -> diagramm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:30:00 -0000 Hi all, anyone knows some tool to generate some diagramm from a pf.conf ? I whould like to generate some diagramm from my pf.conf every day to add to the docs.. Thx Norman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 08:38:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FE61065674 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@mkdev.eu) Received: from natrium.sulf.at (natrium.sulf.at [88.198.116.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7E58FC24 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:38:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mk@mkdev.eu) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (unknown [77.210.93.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by natrium.sulf.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E141114B4 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <47D79696.2080702@mkdev.eu> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:38:46 +0100 From: Markus Klaschka Organization: mkdev.eu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20080208 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080900010505090204060809" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: nfsd performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:38:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080900010505090204060809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I use nfs to mount a few dataspaces into jails( some homedirs and the ftp-share ) I realized that the load goes up a lot, i someone is uploading/downloading a lot small files from/to this share) I also shared the virtual maildir, which I mount directly now, cause that brought me a load > 60 ;) So in the end, is there a possibility to optimize something on nfsd, or is there any other solution to mount one share into more jails without using one share for all of the jails? Cheers Markus -- Markus Klaschka MKDev - Markus Klaschka Development http://www.mkdev.eu Spain: 0034 - 63 747 23 07 UK: 0044 - 750 910 2718 Mail: mk@mkdev.eu Skype: mark-use IRC: mark-use @ irc.freenode.net : #freebsd, ##security, #freebsd-src, #bsdforen.de, #bsdgroup.de --------------080900010505090204060809-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 09:14:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3DF106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569058FC19 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix, from userid 106) id 2A07361A5; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C643B619C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from danielby@localhost) by torus.slightlystrange.org (8.14.2/8.13.4/Submit) id m2C9ERFl028576 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:27 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:27 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080312091427.GA47661@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE i386 Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:14:31 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 05:37:25PM +1100, dajaasge wrote: > Hi there >=20 > As a relatively inexperienced user of FreeBSD I have little input to offe= r =20 > the community as a whole save to suggest that offering a DVD iso image = =20 > from which to install would save the sometimes extreme tediousness of dis= c =20 > swapping when adding packages. If I knew more about it I would make such = =20 > an image myself, however, having never had to do it before it is somethin= g =20 > I will have to pen in for a later time. I believe there are a few people/organisations who provide DVD images - I'm sure Google will help you locate them. I think it fair to say that most people will use ports to compile and install software, rather than relying on the packages on the release ISOs, for the simple reason that the ports tree is a moving target - the packages included with any particular release are out of date (as a set, if not individually) quite quickly, because the porters do a fantastic job of adding new software and updating existing ports. So, my suggestion (as an old hack who's been around for almost a=20 decade ;-) would be to familiarise yourself with the ports tree=20 and all its magic - you'll probably find yourself using it in preference to precompiled packages. The handbook is the best place to start, as ever. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH157zixf5fBYiFmoRApp4AJwM78WYxj4LfLaxe3Li2nVMCFEf4ACgy93W NHeVcD4RSVW0GKFVvbvUuLg= =aqnF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 09:17:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1691065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:17:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521278FC1D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2C9FbsL003288; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:15:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2C9FXHs003285; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:15:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:15:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Markus Klaschka In-Reply-To: <47D79696.2080702@mkdev.eu> Message-ID: <20080312101423.F3284@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47D79696.2080702@mkdev.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfsd performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:17:29 -0000 > brought me a load > 60 ;) > > So in the end, is there a possibility to optimize something on nfsd, or is > there any other solution to mount one share into more jails without using one > share for all of the jails? > man mount_nullfs WARNING - at least in 6.1 read-write mounts caused crashes for me. read-only works fine, which i use to get common /usr on all jails, saving disk space and more important - memory, as binaries are shared. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 09:45:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA24106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from fhw-relay07.plus.net (fhw-relay07.plus.net [212.159.14.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CA68FC17 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=kestrel.milibyte.co.uk) by fhw-relay07.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JZNWd-0000Fx-2Z; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:45:31 +0000 Received: by kestrel.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZNWc-0000lR-5J; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:45:30 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:45:29 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803120945.30038.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on kestrel.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: c3b00f43bebf5681889853c8098cf2a4 Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:45:33 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008, dajaasge wrote: > As a relatively inexperienced user of FreeBSD I have little input to offer > =A0 the community as a whole save to suggest that offering a DVD iso image > from which to install would save the sometimes extreme tediousness of disc > swapping when adding packages. If I knew more about it I would make such = an > image myself, however, having never had to do it before it is something I > will have to pen in for a later time. Creating a DVD from the official FreeBSD CD isos (disc[1-3]) is quite=20 straightforward. Take a look at the instructions on=20 . It describes creating a DVD fr= om=20 a 2 CD set but the process is the same for 3, just include an extra step to= =20 mount and copy disc3 in the same way as he describes disc2, then continue=20 with the instructions for disc2 and disc1 in that order. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 09:58:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E2E1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB838FC27 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA41BE855A; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:58:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: arek@wup-katowice.pl In-Reply-To: <47D7A535.6020206@wup-katowice.pl> References: <1205310589.6953.0.camel@norman-laptop> <47D7A535.6020206@wup-katowice.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:58:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1205315885.6953.2.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: pf.conf -> diagramm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:58:15 -0000 Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2008, 10:41 +0100 schrieb Arek Czereszewski: > Norman Maurer pisze: > > Hi all, > > > > anyone knows some tool to generate some diagramm from a pf.conf ? > > > > I whould like to generate some diagramm from my pf.conf every day to add > > to the docs.. > > > You can use pfstat > > Port: pfstat-2.2_3 > Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/pfstat > Info: Utility to render graphical statistics for pf > > Regards > Arek Hi I need something which displays me the rules in a diagramm :-/ Thx Norman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 10:03:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A521A106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mailgate.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [193.26.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFDB98FC12 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 88727 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 11:51:25 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO domino?hq.procreditbank.bg) (172.16.248.123) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2008 11:51:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5191ed200803111923u5f5d3265r5f4562bb23dce3fa@mail.gmail.com> To: "Mike Garrett" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.2 September 26, 2006 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:34:45 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO_HQ/PROCREDITBANK(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 03/12/2008 11:34:44 AM, Serialize complete at 03/12/2008 11:34:44 AM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 and SATA DVD Drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:03:40 -0000 I think you have troubles with the BIOS configuration and the boot from DVD or with the installation media itself. I had no troubles booting from it on my machine. "Mike Garrett" Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 12.03.2008 04:47 To freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org cc Subject FreeBSD 7 and SATA DVD Drives Hello, does FreeBSD 7 support booting from SATA DVD drives? When I tried 6.2, it didn't work, and I was hoping it has been fixed by now. Thanks for any info, Mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 10:09:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167BE1065672 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB468FC17 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from [84.92.153.232] (helo=kestrel.milibyte.co.uk) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1JZNta-00030z-Cf; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:09:14 +0000 Received: by kestrel.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JZNtY-0000nR-LP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:09:13 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:09:12 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080312091427.GA47661@torus.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <20080312091427.GA47661@torus.slightlystrange.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121009.12536.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on kestrel.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Plusnet-Relay: 5abafb372568d358731a443582325199 Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:09:19 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Daniel Bye wrote: > I think it fair to say that most people will use ports to compile and > install software, rather than relying on the packages on the release > ISOs, for the simple reason that the ports tree is a moving target - > the packages included with any particular release are out of date > (as a set, if not individually) quite quickly, because the porters > do a fantastic job of adding new software and updating existing ports. > > So, my suggestion (as an old hack who's been around for almost a > decade ;-) would be to familiarise yourself with the ports tree > and all its magic - you'll probably find yourself using it in > preference to precompiled packages. The handbook is the best place > to start, as ever. I agree that there are advantages in using ports to ensure things are kept up to date but using the packages supplied with the release can be an advantage for a newcomer to FreeBSD. The ports system can be quite daunting until one has become familiar with the system especially if even just one of the ports fails to build. A new user probably won't have the expertise to recognise and fix the cause of the problem. Installing packages from the CD's pretty well ensures that the new user can get a new system up and running without complication. Many new users would prefer a slightly out of date system that works instead of struggling to fix problems in a totally unfamiliar system. When I first started to use FreeBSD I relied on the packages on the CDs, as I gained more familiarity I was much more confident in using ports for the applications that weren't available as precompiled packages. Although I'm now quite comfortable building from ports I still use precompiled packages where they are available because I've got a relatively low powered PC which makes very heavy going with the bigger ports (e.g. gcc, firefox, KDE) -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 10:17:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C4A1065679 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523948FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:17:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so4205020pyb.10 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:17:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=4o/yPXbSP+8G7Lkce44O6Tujr5Ru4rJlIqRYGs1AaYo=; b=tWrRpH6EDhUPuvkPsKjbdpGQyJ4Vm0CfW9JxYcokyRUaHH7wwsGX3rJiQEnZF7FE1zkZUk0eXPMUfG9r58GMzf9SEpdJ7SIdYctdte8sG8rjrhUtjaYaJF0UfpxAjtKQNfTNv/Wn7a/+duQAEcMJ6tEebMRaMAthR740upKP1UE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XnTIDpoHvo1iEIyVA7LaqzCkRr/oVzAFfQqGTgyWsKhOuXgMrynwHMYwbxSZSIbmU99SltFjrrBtxseD/R3l9ZqepQufxhib6xmT6MIQeVWzX3VNi6FUTf2wY/AIOmXHR+4IHMwum2jxp2rjPP2eXW2SMzQJqrfVXA/1685wAEQ= Received: by 10.64.91.15 with SMTP id o15mr1133623qbb.28.1205317048943; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.209.5 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f916c90803120317w1d5a9277j5c49cc1109bcf4e4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:17:28 +0000 From: "Kemian Dang" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: xpdf segmentation fault on FreeBSD 7.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:17:35 -0000 Hi, all, I have installed xpdf 3.02 on a FreeBSD 7.0 Release Box without problem, I can use "xpdf -h" to get the help information, But when ever I just use "xpdf" or "xpdf some.pdf", it will give a "segmentation fault" and without any other note. Is there any one have met such things and please suggest me how can I solve it? Best wishes, Kemian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 10:23:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496AB106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from trinite.amoks-hebergement.com (trinite.amoks-hebergement.com [91.121.14.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1098FC1C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [83.205.52.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nicolas@amoks-hebergement.com) by trinite.amoks-hebergement.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA29E37FEC11 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:05:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D7AAEA.8060702@nicoelro.net> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:05:30 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How use and manage a Berkeley DB 1.85? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:23:48 -0000 Hello, I have a db Berkeley DB 1.85. I have softwares which use it. I would like to know how manage it? How show all datas contained? How delete a data? How insert a data? Is there a port to do this? Thanks. - Nicolas. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 11:27:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C53E106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D9F8FC32 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B48242845C; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:27:56 -0400 (EDT) To: "Snow Mountains" References: <3cf9f8920803101018i573a5c26l986b9508495fcd5a@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:27:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3cf9f8920803101018i573a5c26l986b9508495fcd5a@mail.gmail.com> (Snow Mountains's message of "Mon\, 10 Mar 2008 18\:18\:39 +0100") Message-ID: <444pbcdvwj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no ad1s3a,b,d... on ad1s3 after bsdlabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:27:57 -0000 "Snow Mountains" writes: > I try to understand bsdlabel. > I have former fat slice (ad1s3) on my disk and I want to make several > BSD partitions on it. I did this: > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1s3 bs=1k count=1024 > 1024+0 records in > 1024+0 records out > 1048576 bytes transferred in 0.318986 secs (3287217 bytes/sec) > # bsdlabel -w ad1s3 > # bsdlabel -e ad1s3 > (edit) > # bsdlabel ad1s3 > # /dev/ad1s3: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 10000000 16 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > b: 10000000 10000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > c: 47616660 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > d: 27616644 20000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > # newfs -U /dev/ad1s3a > newfs: /dev/ad1s3a: could not find special device > # ls /dev/ad1s3* > /dev/ad1s3 > # > > What I miss because I don't have ad1s3a,b,d? > If repeat same procedure on disk (big file) mounted as /dev/md0, a see > /dev/md0,a,b,d,e... after this group of commands. On what version of FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 11:30:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F56E1065675 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5742C8FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZPAU-0001HH-0H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:46 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:45 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:45 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:35:07 +0100 Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <47D7AAEA.8060702@nicoelro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD733F6ECCAC3ADF293BC6A3C" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <47D7AAEA.8060702@nicoelro.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: How use and manage a Berkeley DB 1.85? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:30:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD733F6ECCAC3ADF293BC6A3C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicolas Letellier wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I have a db Berkeley DB 1.85. I have softwares which use it. > I would like to know how manage it? How show all datas contained? How > delete a data? How insert a data? > Is there a port to do this? BDB is a single-file key-value database. It's not a SQL or any other transactional database, and it's fairly simple to program for. Unfortunately I don't think there are any friendly utilities to inspect the data. If you know any programming language (C, Python, Perl...), it's almost trivial to write one. See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Ddbopen and the manual page= s linked from there. --------------enigD733F6ECCAC3ADF293BC6A3C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH17/sldnAQVacBcgRAksoAJ9yRfGqiqPnwjIJsRJWtwYH8rBKkQCg5F9W RCfcNpngC0DLd0ySlrg6hT8= =0Byp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD733F6ECCAC3ADF293BC6A3C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 11:41:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1D31065716 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4288FC1C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 35CB12845C; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:41:00 -0400 (EDT) To: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug References: <001c01c882a9$0b7881f0$226985d0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:41:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <001c01c882a9$0b7881f0$226985d0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> (Dedan Kiruri's message of "Mon\, 10 Mar 2008 15\:19\:48 +0300") Message-ID: <44zlt4cgqb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do i regularly update my free bsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:01 -0000 "Dedan Kiruri" writes: > Hi I would be interested in getting help through your mailing list spam > concerning my free bsd mail server > > I would like to learn administration using linux/updating virus definitions > and scanners. FreeBSD isn't Linux. Virus-scanning will be pretty much the same, though; it depends on the software you install for the purpose, and in general they'll be available on both. Did you have a particular one in mind, or already running? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 12:13:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CB1106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pitney.brad@googlemail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1D38FC18 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pitney.brad@googlemail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so1935736rvb.43 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:13:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=/VT7eNwd5mEnuVlMygPZfOXphaxfuJYiV4g95OZprsQ=; b=HjfBId7ZfbutV8ORwHE9armbrvnqO+w/MaeLdQ80pUPQCd+KcL6GX6b+PraplBkkYly+9AOGxncvkbX/Af22imCzq/6Ey5VqPNh7XDjS3C5R+HXtThDZJJKhU6U6mRtUjfwO1evlsXT3RqFIVC7eAKhltgbYgSpJ/ABJ5GpvIL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ZrAdFnTAifxLyVPloOMT2zrlQjodJUkxr1WlwsVMxxkad9TMrGcCsQRfb2KZ0J5zJlVY3lVPG1VJA3HATTrc1jQdS7SQLXaXeWtL2xuoW2izf9Tla46z+N/cGZT3jY1e0dtcaZgvAl52enRgPXePMkp6SXB3MXH5CKslGv3eBw0= Received: by 10.141.96.21 with SMTP id y21mr4998108rvl.132.1205322486941; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.41.8 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3dd203290803120448u48bd32f3vce9db38448fc8001@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:48:06 +0000 From: "Brad Pitney" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Which List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:13:02 -0000 Hello, which list is best for me to post a Lock Order Reversal which is related the ral driver? What about DevFS? the box was running CURRENT until it was branched for RELENG_7 which was running code from September 2007 fine until I updated to "todays" code. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 12:30:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF841065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:30:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snow.mountains.4@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC9C8FC1D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snow.mountains.4@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1533127ele.12 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=M1uHJaEnhnAs3iQC0vWOfnWzJu+t8ed56TUseI4FPa8=; b=wbQsMJLyzKNs/qE4hGAPDvegDV8ZFmpAg3V8ss2+xtqdex6nEnYFfMHmgoRLB57pizrDcgY3e1lFXxdiI1FbHyfXrkCHHwzMh1TIX+LAVCR10clwR2HOX2u9LiXzg08vrz/Ks2d4msL6/rxkdc/xD7aCBMvuUCYmEkObdDaq8rk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IW2H7SrqF4U9IRJpBz9vhwR9r80lBbfKaGOG4WOQTf0Jy1oNbdv5qs26pUvOltSzsDh1cbOx468cc7QRdgYF2ZprQ9WNNfq8BXr5QPeos3CutbymSuherLJZVu4lq+HF7C30nQ9WjQgG0VQ1WGlteRuIlmSt8G6Rx22dgVIiEXo= Received: by 10.142.49.4 with SMTP id w4mr3282780wfw.57.1205325035480; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.3 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3cf9f8920803120530k7f6420bfl5aa203864c058c90@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:30:34 +0100 From: "Snow Mountains" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <444pbcdvwj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3cf9f8920803101018i573a5c26l986b9508495fcd5a@mail.gmail.com> <444pbcdvwj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org Subject: Re: no ad1s3a,b,d... on ad1s3 after bsdlabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:30:41 -0000 2008/3/12, Lowell Gilbert : > "Snow Mountains" writes: > > > I try to understand bsdlabel. > > I have former fat slice (ad1s3) on my disk and I want to make several > > BSD partitions on it. I did this: > > > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1s3 bs=1k count=1024 > > 1024+0 records in > > 1024+0 records out > > 1048576 bytes transferred in 0.318986 secs (3287217 bytes/sec) > > # bsdlabel -w ad1s3 > > # bsdlabel -e ad1s3 > > (edit) > > # bsdlabel ad1s3 > > # /dev/ad1s3: > > 8 partitions: > > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > > a: 10000000 16 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > b: 10000000 10000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > c: 47616660 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit > > d: 27616644 20000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > # newfs -U /dev/ad1s3a > > newfs: /dev/ad1s3a: could not find special device > > # ls /dev/ad1s3* > > /dev/ad1s3 > > # > > > > What I miss because I don't have ad1s3a,b,d? > > If repeat same procedure on disk (big file) mounted as /dev/md0, a see > > /dev/md0,a,b,d,e... after this group of commands. > > > On what version of FreeBSD? > This happens on: # uname -r 6.2-RELEASE-p11 SergiM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 12:31:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27208106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from mail.irbisnet.ru (mail.irbisnet.ru [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:aa:203:baff:fe18:f4c1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4B48FC1F for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([85.172.11.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.irbisnet.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CCUvYk075202 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:30:59 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Message-ID: <47D7CCD4.40105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:30:12 +0300 From: Yuri Pankov User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brad Pitney References: <3dd203290803120448u48bd32f3vce9db38448fc8001@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3dd203290803120448u48bd32f3vce9db38448fc8001@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:31:02 -0000 Brad Pitney wrote: > Hello, > > which list is best for me to post a Lock Order Reversal which is related the > ral driver? > > What about DevFS? > > the box was running CURRENT until it was branched for RELENG_7 which was > running code from September 2007 fine until I updated to "todays" code. Check current@ archives, these LORs may be (and I think they were) already reported. Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 12:52:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9BA1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver@akephalos.de) Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.de [194.25.134.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1C08FC25 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver@akephalos.de) Received: from fwd33.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1JZQRA-0002sr-03; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:52:04 +0100 Received: from localhost (ZYM7kQZO8tVe5nUzfnM+J+fDyp934t6AcHs95H9Y8eLqM-3sBIX0IwmwVRiUPoFf+XpdQxEmlm@[91.21.70.219]) by fwd33.t-online.de with esmtp id 1JZQQu-0DnkCO0; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:48 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:48 +0100 From: Oliver Herold To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080312125148.GA42727@asgard.home> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Herold , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <82f916c90803120317w1d5a9277j5c49cc1109bcf4e4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82f916c90803120317w1d5a9277j5c49cc1109bcf4e4@mail.gmail.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.fixmbr.de/wp-content/uploads/oliver-gpg-key.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ID: ZYM7kQZO8tVe5nUzfnM+J+fDyp934t6AcHs95H9Y8eLqM-3sBIX0IwmwVRiUPoFf+XpdQxEmlm X-TOI-MSGID: 61fc133a-df44-4c16-81fb-35d69908213b Subject: Re: xpdf segmentation fault on FreeBSD 7.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:52:07 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, I'm using it without any problems. Maybe you have some strange configuration in /etc/make.conf? Cheers, Oliver Kemian Dang wrote: > Hi, all, >=20 > I have installed xpdf 3.02 on a FreeBSD 7.0 Release Box without > problem, I can use "xpdf -h" to get the help information, But when > ever I just use "xpdf" or "xpdf some.pdf", it will give a > "segmentation fault" and without any other note. > Is there any one have met such things and please suggest me how can I sol= ve it? >=20 > Best wishes, > Kemian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Q: How do you shoot a blue elephant? A: With a blue-elephant gun. Q: How do you shoot a pink elephant? A: Twist its trunk until it turns blue, then shoot it with a blue-elephant gun. --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfX0eMACgkQbZFSiGSuUEiBrQCfYNc9I2f0jH9Kv9QTBCkkPqe6 AnsAniUSEnReIy9P7jdR1bSaGF7B31cz =6RbN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 13:00:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E9610656BF for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from csmtp2.b-one.net (csmtp2.b-one.net [195.47.247.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39B78FC24 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from [128.70.15.100] (85.248-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.248.85]) by csmtp2.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B566916000B2F for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:38:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:36:30 +0100 From: Luigi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bsd.luigi@alshome.be List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:00:38 -0000 Hi all, Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a superuser password. I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? Thanks Luigi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 13:07:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9F41065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AD78FC2A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-83591.home.otenet.gr [87.203.79.213]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m2CD7brf022070 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:07:37 +0200 Message-ID: <47D7D5C9.6040505@otenet.gr> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:08:25 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200803120945.30038.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200803120945.30038.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:07:41 -0000 Mike Clarke wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008, dajaasge wrote: > > >> As a relatively inexperienced user of FreeBSD I have little input to offer >> the community as a whole save to suggest that offering a DVD iso image >> from which to install would save the sometimes extreme tediousness of disc >> swapping when adding packages. If I knew more about it I would make such an >> image myself, however, having never had to do it before it is something I >> will have to pen in for a later time. >> > > Creating a DVD from the official FreeBSD CD isos (disc[1-3]) is quite > straightforward. Take a look at the instructions on > . It describes creating a DVD from > a 2 CD set but the process is the same for 3, just include an extra step to > mount and copy disc3 in the same way as he describes disc2, then continue > with the instructions for disc2 and disc1 in that order. > > Or, if for some reason you don't want to build it yourself, download this torrent: http://www.tuxdistro.com/torrents-details.php?id=921 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 13:52:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26ACC1065679 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008A08FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DF7EBC0C; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:52:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:52:38 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: bsd.luigi@alshome.be Message-Id: <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:52:41 -0000 In response to Luigi : > Hi all, > > Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. > > I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a > superuser password. > I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? This is a PC-BSD-specific question. There is no such thing as "the superuser" ... it's a colloquialism frequently used by folks to make things sound cooler (or for some other reason I don't understand) PC-BSD has several community lists, including a support list. Have you tried asking there?: http://www.pcbsd.org/content/view/22/29/ -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:25:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBF51065677 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from csmtp2.b-one.net (csmtp2.b-one.net [195.47.247.206]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3648FC13 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from [128.70.15.100] (85.248-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.248.85]) by csmtp2.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DE116001790; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:25:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D7E762.30607@alshome.be> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:23:30 +0100 From: Luigi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bsd.luigi@alshome.be List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:25:39 -0000 Thanks to all. I'll try it. Luigi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:28:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE65B106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952218FC27 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444A51EE86E for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:28:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.09 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.09 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.179, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zX9uJLZXWY30 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:28:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ED41EEA78 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:28:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:28:25 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080127) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:34 -0000 I've done pkg_delete -a on a newly upgraded 7.0-RELEASE. After installing approx. 400 ports I'm trying to install kdebase, kdegames and kdeutils. I do not want to install the kde-metaport that's why I go about it this way. The compile error I get is Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted Any suggestions? Thanks Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:28:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728211065682 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pitney.brad@googlemail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0448FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pitney.brad@googlemail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c49so2223113wra.19 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:28:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=KwRD6rj8QNOGTc33vPAEvXkxvrEGa/+5K9D+u4HbI3w=; b=SY5E4YfosRsPM84f+Hn6Uu9nsrj0BzyeTEH7fBo+7H7v2nCjVdw/lX4jnzMgGmQ14LF2rL7RtyfEwB6mgu/d1YtWaj50hqqhxR3cfhepW5gpRc/+cJaJw39ICb0lEhbUuxdYAHhKQxe86S1j2SbRkNA/DDvRd6p+5SSlR0BqXGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=xp9Z4bvdT6HBVo/HVlloVdDcqRfOhe37+rV3g24NrxeJIhSR/kBihMK8ILZJsv5PgkjuhhxJrXVdJTRjZhrX6foFVORwI1q9ni20iFVwAqeGn3ecxhAIXyfy5ax6VoWn4QgW7gLD74rSIou0tnvCRoIE61y1Utmuf4d+Q17PX4s= Received: by 10.141.161.6 with SMTP id n6mr5127747rvo.201.1205332134555; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.41.8 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 07:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3dd203290803120728i72d06492iec6db9a5fcb41ac8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:54 +0000 From: "Brad Pitney" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <47D7CCD4.40105@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3dd203290803120448u48bd32f3vce9db38448fc8001@mail.gmail.com> <47D7CCD4.40105@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Which List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:28:57 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Brad Pitney wrote: > > Hello, > > > > which list is best for me to post a Lock Order Reversal which is related > the > > ral driver? > > > > What about DevFS? > > > > the box was running CURRENT until it was branched for RELENG_7 which was > > running code from September 2007 fine until I updated to "todays" code. > > Check current@ archives, these LORs may be (and I think they were) > already reported. > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html I found two fairly similar. I'll post to current@ > > > Yuri > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:31:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A021065679 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mailgate.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [193.26.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 754138FC2B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:31:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 13168 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 16:45:48 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO domino?hq.procreditbank.bg) (172.16.248.123) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 12 Mar 2008 16:45:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> To: bsd.luigi@alshome.be MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.2 September 26, 2006 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:29:08 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO_HQ/PROCREDITBANK(Release 7.0.2|September 26, 2006) at 03/12/2008 04:29:06 PM, Serialize complete at 03/12/2008 04:29:06 PM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:31:23 -0000 Is this the root password of the system or something else? Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Luigi Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 12.03.2008 14:59 Please respond to bsd.luigi@alshome.be To freebsd-questions cc Subject Superuser password lost Hi all, Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a superuser password. I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? Thanks Luigi _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:37:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE135106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4318FC1D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) id m2CEbGg4067904; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:37:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:37:15 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: kalin m Message-ID: <20080312143714.GB34485@dan.emsphone.com> References: <47D5E08D.1000203@el.net> <283601c88322$b4ba8af0$6900a8c0@tamouh> <47D6D277.40806@el.net> <20080311200804.GA34485@dan.emsphone.com> <47D71617.1070103@el.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D71617.1070103@el.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: "Tamouh H." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:37:17 -0000 In the last episode (Mar 11), kalin m said: > thanks.... [...] > > in my case the machine showed me the ar0 to install the system on it > without doing this 'quick and dirty way'. > > and now i get: > # atacontrol status ar0 > ar0: ATA RAID1 status: READY > subdisks: > 0 ad4 ONLINE > 1 ad6 ONLINE > > that tells me that i actually do have RAID1 active. which means it's a > software one, correct? Right. The system must have already been set up for RAID when you bought it. > also if you do not mind please elaborate on "MatrixRAID is one of > those not-really-raid controllers that only provides RAID during the > boot process..." All of the controllers handled by the ataraid device are BIOS-only raid controllers. Once the boot process hands control to an operating system, that OS has to manage the RAID itself, making sure that mirrored disks are written to, and rebuilding damaged volumes. This is different from hardware RAID, where external hardware (usually with a battery-backed RAM cache to add performance) manages all of that and the OS just has to read and write blocks to the virtual raid device. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 14:39:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0F3106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from csmtp3.b-one.net (csmtp3.one.com [195.47.247.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874D28FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from [128.70.15.100] (85.248-78-194.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be [194.78.248.85]) by csmtp3.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5717100E840; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:44 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D7EAB5.6020008@alshome.be> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:37:41 +0100 From: Luigi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivailo Tanusheff References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bsd.luigi@alshome.be List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:39:46 -0000 Yes I think it is the root password of the system. Ivailo Tanusheff a crit : > Is this the root password of the system or something else? > > Regards, > Ivailo Tanusheff > > > > > Luigi > Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > 12.03.2008 14:59 > Please respond to > bsd.luigi@alshome.be > > > To > freebsd-questions > cc > > Subject > Superuser password lost > > > > > > > Hi all, > > Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. > > I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a > superuser password. > I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? > > Thanks > > Luigi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:05:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3191065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A688FC20 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2CF650a006472; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:06:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2CF64Bh006471; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:06:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:06:04 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: dajaasge Message-ID: <20080312150604.GB6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:05:45 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 05:37:25PM +1100, dajaasge wrote: > Hi there > > As a relatively inexperienced user of FreeBSD I have little input to offer > the community as a whole save to suggest that offering a DVD iso image > from which to install would save the sometimes extreme tediousness of disc > swapping when adding packages. If I knew more about it I would make such > an image myself, however, having never had to do it before it is something > I will have to pen in for a later time. I think most people install over the net and so only need the CD (DVD) to boot and set up sysinstall. Then there is no swapping of disks and you get the latest in ports. So, people tend not to feel the need for a DVD ISO. But, if you do not have an adequate internet connection, this becomes less practical, unfortunately. ////jerry > > Just a thought. > > Thanks, > > David. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:17:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E90106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ginganutz@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF0E8FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ginganutz@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3421396waf.3 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:17:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hrURtcxd7YG1lEvyZCGy7KBIFzQDNocIwJ+Jd79Vp0c=; b=MLyZvYjgtxubZ8uhH7W7oDa6Cap77vub1wuU6i7YWdUF5cxkcv3nsisHAsg+GlS07rg/2qkitHCtF8DnOuEQM2n4YAgcRHChHIRGEtgoPQDRrrbJWqq96cQusdf0XHhjt+OnOqqG3huBxuyaZSD/o1fRBAGg6e2Y9Ksn9Wbzv5I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BFYNbThI2qnKADXE/Dj9+HIxZmv+4ZqG4YcyczkyFPjIxeDBWyiOcxLfnMYY8vIoXGxUstqyx4NHd72mjsrddWw/99oth9xsVuaxE+lSx2gN/SnPpx7xDQgcl/k8uS3VfJlfxKNsn598XtU9aaKpkI17U7k0f48IMsQG6sAq+oM= Received: by 10.115.54.1 with SMTP id g1mr7687841wak.136.1205335071708; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.130.13 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <101567640803120817rb72c297q498b2743bcf2e2d4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:17:48 +0000 From: "Simon Street" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200803061938.35765.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <101567640802270431h69e443c9n63090e4b260f3a7b@mail.gmail.com> <200803051814.49944.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <101567640803060312x70992ef3k85de3acebc5e39be@mail.gmail.com> <200803061938.35765.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2+PHP+700 sites = DNS Issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:17:52 -0000 On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Mel wrote: > On Thursday 06 March 2008 12:12:05 Simon Street wrote: > > > I've copied resolv.conf to /usr/local/etc and HostnameLookups is > > already enabled, no joy :( (Have restarted apache also). > > > Hmm hmmm. > So apache can look up IP's and write hostname into it's log, but php can't > resolve anything. If it's got something to do with FDSET, then if it has no > traffic at all, the problem should go away. Does it? Not sure if you can test > that, but block all incoming traffic for 30 seconds and run your test script, > shouldn't be too difficult. > > Does this work: > var_dump(gethostbyname("www.example.com")); > > Maybe it isn't related to resolving at all - like, are there any disallowed > functions in your php configuration? var_dump.. etc returns string(15) "www.example.com" disable_functions shows as none in phpinfo! However I've just noticed in the domain logs that its logging IP's not hostnames, I assume this is wrong given "HostnameLookups On" is in a conf file that is included by httpd.conf. Is there any way to confirm at runtime that this directive is being obeyed? Thanks, Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:19:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860601065675 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCF38FC26 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2CFJMp4006538; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:19:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2CFJMLP006537; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:19:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:19:22 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: bsd.luigi@alshome.be, freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:04 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:52:38AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Luigi : > > > Hi all, > > > > Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. > > > > I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a > > superuser password. > > I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? > > This is a PC-BSD-specific question. There is no such thing as "the > superuser" ... it's a colloquialism frequently used by folks to make > things sound cooler (or for some other reason I don't understand) I don't understand this response. Superuser is just another name for the root user which is any user id with a UID of 0. I haven't used PC-BSD flavor, but in general, with BSDs you force them to boot - by killing power if necessary, but a clean shutdown is better (but that usually requires root). Then, while it is booting, make it boot to 'single user' mode. At that point, at the console, you are root. Clean up a little fsck -p mount -u / mount -a swapon -a Then just set a password for root --- and don't forget it. passwd root follow the prompts If PC-BSD doesn't let you boot to single user, then you will need to use an installation CD to get to the point you can write to the passwd and master.passwd files. ////jerry > PC-BSD has several community lists, including a support list. Have > you tried asking there?: > http://www.pcbsd.org/content/view/22/29/ > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:19:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6536910656DE for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227888FC1B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZSjb-0004lQ-Nu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:15 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:15 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:15 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:23:35 +0100 Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig775C2DEB9B831B3095AB1396" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:19:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig775C2DEB9B831B3095AB1396 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dajaasge wrote: > Hi there >=20 > As a relatively inexperienced user of FreeBSD I have little input to > offer the community as a whole save to suggest that offering a DVD iso > image from which to install would save the sometimes extreme tediousnes= s > of disc swapping when adding packages. If I knew more about it I would > make such an image myself, however, having never had to do it before it= > is something I will have to pen in for a later time. As others said, most experienced people install a more-or-less barebones system and add packages over the net. Alternatively, you might try an experimental system such as http://blogs.freebsdish.org/ivoras/2008/02/11/finstall-alpha3/ . --------------enig775C2DEB9B831B3095AB1396 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH1/V3ldnAQVacBcgRAuJpAKDwOHyJEAzNaRPJnkyrd36TVt5EgACfQocU 6oXi6jlItJgNtI6O09Jx46c= =GwDF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig775C2DEB9B831B3095AB1396-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:27:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1651E1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1178FC12 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F41EBC0B; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:27:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:27:36 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: bsd.luigi@alshome.be, freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:27:38 -0000 In response to Jerry McAllister : > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:52:38AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > In response to Luigi : > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. > > > > > > I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a > > > superuser password. > > > I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? > > > > This is a PC-BSD-specific question. There is no such thing as "the > > superuser" ... it's a colloquialism frequently used by folks to make > > things sound cooler (or for some other reason I don't understand) > > I don't understand this response. Superuser is just another > name for the root user which is any user id with a UID of 0. No. The term "superuser" is a made-up term for any way of gaining root privs. In my experience it's confusing as there are two commonly used methods for doing this, the su command and sudo, and they require different passwords. Frankly, I don't know whether PC-BSD is asking for the root password or asking for him to confirm _his_ password for use in a sudo-like operation. I don't know of anywhere in the FreeBSD base system that the term "superuser" is used, so I assume he'll get a more direct answer from the PC-BSD folks. > I haven't used PC-BSD flavor, but in general, with BSDs you force > them to boot - by killing power if necessary, but a clean shutdown > is better (but that usually requires root). The instructions you give are only correct if it's the root password he lost. It's likely you're right and this will get him up and running again, but I didn't know that for sure and didn't want to lead him down a bunch of steps only to find out that it was asking for something different. I was curious about the PC-BSD community and checked their web site. Based on what I saw, the best advice to me seemed to be to direct him to them. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:39:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E37106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B698FC18 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 69F8A1426D6; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:39:34 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889321426CD; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:39:25 +0200 (EET) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:39:23 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <94136a2c0803101454l6ca76c99ma1fa1083d7ea2137@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0803101520p4f044ce4lae76975f899296e7@mail.gmail.com> <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080310232639.K7504@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121739.24408.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: Zbigniew Szalbot , Wojciech Puchar Subject: Re: traceroute problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:35 -0000 On Tuesday 11 March 2008 00:30:05 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Right - thanks. I will see if I can unblock it then. Hm, I wouldn't bet on it, since most of these devices tend to have preconfigured well-hidden firewall rules. > traceroute uses UDP packets, no special port numbers. FreeBSD's traceroute can use TCP or ICMP instead of UDP. You can also force using a specific port, so you can mimic a web browser that uses an insanely small TTL. Something like: "-e -P TCP -p 80 $destination_host" or "-P ICMP $destination_host" I've had success using combinations like the above. Of course, if your NAT device drops ICMP indistinctively or does not relate these ICMP to your LAN address, you're out of luck. I think many DLinks are Linux based, so there is good possibility to have a proper TCP/IP stack and a proper packet filter. Can't tell of the packet filter rules though. HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:39:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359FB1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159578FC14 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CFdVoC011589 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:39:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m2CFdUh8011586 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.kq6up.org: chris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Maness X-X-Sender: chris@ns1.kq6up.org To: FreeBSD List Message-ID: <20080312083150.G11508@ns1.kq6up.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: libm.so.4 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:39:49 -0000 How do I build 7.0 with libm.so.4 compatibility built in? I find it on my 6.3 system. But not on my upgraded 7.0 system. in reference to: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-May/122264.html I see that I should be able to add the variable: COMPAT4X=yes to /etc/make.conf but this flag is not recognized by the Makefile in /usr/src/. Has this been obsoleted? What is the correct way to add this compatibility if possible? What is the function of ld-elf.so.1? Thanks Chris Maness (909) 223-9179 http://www.chrismaness.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:41:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65151106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:41:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mirc@weed.stonednetwork.net) Received: from weed.stonednetwork.net (weed.stonednetwork.net [64.18.156.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1468FC2E for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:41:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mirc@weed.stonednetwork.net) Received: from weed.stonednetwork.net (mirc@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by weed.stonednetwork.net (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m2CDJw2v077335 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:19:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mirc@weed.stonednetwork.net) Received: (from mirc@localhost) by weed.stonednetwork.net (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id m2CDJwXr077334; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mirc) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:58 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200803121319.m2CDJwXr077334@weed.stonednetwork.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "received@postcard.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:41:10 -0000 You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! . You can pick up your postcard at the following web address: . [1]http://dozer.apid.com/~jcapp/postcard.gif.exe . If you can't click on the web address above, you can also visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset . (Your postcard will be available for 60 days.) . Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard, you can do so by visiting this web address: http://www2.postcards.org/ (Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard" button beneath your postcard!) . We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do, please take a moment to send a few yourself! . Regards, 1001 Postcards http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ References 1. http://dozer.apid.com/~jcapp/postcard.gif.exe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:46:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC5D1065684 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor@netmediaservices.net) Received: from fep3.cogeco.net (smtp2.cogeco.ca [216.221.81.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BA48FC34 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from victor@netmediaservices.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (d221-71-130.commercial.cgocable.net [216.221.71.130]) by fep3.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07B42494 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:46:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47D7FAD2.8010907@netmediaservices.net> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:46:26 -0400 From: Victor Farah User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080311-0, 03/11/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: QMail Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:46:36 -0000 Hello I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I made. I start qmail using supervise scripts. Also in my smtproutes file can I use IP's, and do they have to be enclosed inside brackets? E.G. super.com:[1.2.3.4] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:46:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA1F106568D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:46:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFE38FC20 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2CFkwvr006733; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2CFkwbP006732; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:46:58 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20080312154658.GA6696@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister , bsd.luigi@alshome.be, freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:46:40 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:36AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Jerry McAllister : > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:52:38AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > In response to Luigi : > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. > > > > > > > > I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a > > > > superuser password. > > > > I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? > > > > > > This is a PC-BSD-specific question. There is no such thing as "the > > > superuser" ... it's a colloquialism frequently used by folks to make > > > things sound cooler (or for some other reason I don't understand) > > > > I don't understand this response. Superuser is just another > > name for the root user which is any user id with a UID of 0. > > No. The term "superuser" is a made-up term for any way of gaining > root privs. In my experience it's confusing as there are two > commonly used methods for doing this, the su command and sudo, and > they require different passwords. I have never seen the term used that way. I have seen su and sudo referred to as ways of a non-root id gaining superuser priviledge/root priviledge but not a superuser as someone who is not root, but has a method of gaining root priviledge. Anyway, the OP sounds mostly like root is what was needed. ////jerry > > Frankly, I don't know whether PC-BSD is asking for the root password > or asking for him to confirm _his_ password for use in a sudo-like > operation. I don't know of anywhere in the FreeBSD base system > that the term "superuser" is used, so I assume he'll get a more > direct answer from the PC-BSD folks. > > > I haven't used PC-BSD flavor, but in general, with BSDs you force > > them to boot - by killing power if necessary, but a clean shutdown > > is better (but that usually requires root). > > The instructions you give are only correct if it's the root > password he lost. It's likely you're right and this will get him > up and running again, but I didn't know that for sure and didn't want > to lead him down a bunch of steps only to find out that it was asking > for something different. > > I was curious about the PC-BSD community and checked their web site. > Based on what I saw, the best advice to me seemed to be to direct him > to them. > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 15:48:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889ED106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E018FC23 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:53399 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JZTBP-0005UO-8o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:48:00 +0100 Received: (qmail 21019 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 16:41:16 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2008 16:41:16 +0100 Received: (qmail 60136 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Mar 2008 16:41:16 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:41:16 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20080312154116.GA60091@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Moran , Jerry McAllister , bsd.luigi@alshome.be, freebsd-questions References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JZTBP-0005UO-8o. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JZTBP-0005UO-8o 0c1e53fef1fccaee76d6fdd47f528eb2 Cc: Jerry McAllister , bsd.luigi@alshome.be, freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:48:01 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:36AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Jerry McAllister : > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:52:38AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > In response to Luigi : > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Maybe it's a simple question but i'm a newbie lost in my new BSDworld. > > > > > > > > I've installed PC-BSD but when I want to install a software, It ask me a > > > > superuser password. > > > > I think I lost this password. How can I retrieve this superuser password ? > > > > > > This is a PC-BSD-specific question. There is no such thing as "the > > > superuser" ... it's a colloquialism frequently used by folks to make > > > things sound cooler (or for some other reason I don't understand) > > > > I don't understand this response. Superuser is just another > > name for the root user which is any user id with a UID of 0. > > No. The term "superuser" is a made-up term for any way of gaining > root privs. Wrong. "superuser" is, just as the previous poster said, a synonym for "root", i.e. a user account with UID=0 See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superuser or http://catb.org/jargon/html/S/superuser.html -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 16:00:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16111065674 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx07.cern.ch [137.138.166.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1F38FC22 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E7GhK8arMCEFqCZY+76yN4GC9AWHtcSAEtTtGb2V4YYEsfoYDBWviIGrO/DSZ53bGZZDMdNwE9gx0wdGAkD/mGto4j0tApLm/ACjpRtxmi3v9pww30imtrzh2OjqYXaC; Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX07 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg50.cern.ch ([137.138.137.175]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:00:04 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:59:48 +0100 Message-ID: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA0177888C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: selected port (devel/root) is marked as broken Thread-Index: AciEWhjN2vNcUoVwRKSLtyL2sV+tUw== From: "Luca Presotto" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2008 16:00:04.0928 (UTC) FILETIME=[23017400:01C8845A] Subject: selected port (devel/root) is marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:00:07 -0000 Hi, I often use have to use root a program that has been ported to freebsd. If I try portinstall or I go into the directory and do make /make install I get "selected port is marked as broken: Does not compile" Or maybe a slightly different error with the same meaning.(I'm not on that machine now so I cannot cut and paste) That's ok, but I want to have root on freebsd to be able to use that machine more often. I downloaded the sources from root.cern.ch then I tried to compile them. The suggested way is to use a provided script where you type the OS and the arch of your machine and it sets up everything for you. But this script supports only freebsd4/5/6, not 7.0 which I'm currently using. I tried telling him "it's 6" but then when compiling I get some errors, as announced by the previous messages!=20 What can I try to be able to compile it? Will that be hard to do? Do you know if somebody is already working at it and give me some link to them? Thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 16:07:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AC2106568A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333CF8FC23 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) X-Trace: 60985416/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$INTERNET-ACCEPTED/None/62.31.10.181 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 62.31.10.181 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: xfb52@dial.pipex.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnQBAPqc10c+Hwq1/2dsb2JhbAAIqC8 X-IP-Direction: OUT Received: from 62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO [192.168.23.2]) ([62.31.10.181]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2008 16:07:28 +0000 Message-ID: <47D7FFB8.40506@dial.pipex.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:07:20 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:07:57 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >I don't know of anywhere in the FreeBSD base system >that the term "superuser" is used, so I assume he'll get a more >direct answer from the PC-BSD folks. > > Hate to be picky, because I'd agree with most everything else you wrote, but superuser, and its synonym super-user, do appear in many base man pages, for example the su page shown below. Sometimes it's a shortcut for root (or other UID 0 user), like below in su, sometimes just for effective UID 0 in general, for example as in mount(8). > The su utility requests appropriate user credentials via PAM and > switches > to that user ID (the default user is the superuser). A shell is then > executed. I'd contend that the su manpage *should* say root not superuser, since root is hardwired as the default. But for other cases, any user with UID 0 might work just as well (e.g. toor). --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 16:38:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D848106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep32-int.chello.at (viefep32-int.chello.at [62.179.121.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2AF8FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:38:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [80.99.119.182]) by viefep32-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.02 201-2186-121-104-20070414) with ESMTP id <20080312162305.MOCG5985.viefep32-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:23:05 +0100 Message-ID: <47D80366.5040206@shopzeus.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:23:02 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: List of active users, logged in with gdm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:38:31 -0000 Hi, I would like to get the list of the users who are actively logged in remotely with gdm, along with their IP address. The commands 'w' and 'users' does not work. What is the right command to get this list? uname: FreeBSD test.dyndns.org 6.2-RELEASE-p7 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p7 #4: Wed Aug 29 14:01:04 CEST 2007 gandalf@test.dyndns.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DARKSUN i386 (The computer is an application server, serving applications to diskless machines with gdm + gnome.) Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 17:22:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1D8106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [207.115.11.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC718FC22 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with ESMTP id <20080312172246H0400a97h4e>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:22:46 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D81160.2060301@datapipe.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:22:40 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Farah References: <47D7FAD2.8010907@netmediaservices.net> In-Reply-To: <47D7FAD2.8010907@netmediaservices.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: QMail Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:22:47 -0000 Victor Farah wrote: > Hello > I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my > /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM > qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I > made. I start qmail using supervise scripts. > > Also in my smtproutes file can I use IP's, and do they have to be > enclosed inside brackets? > E.G. super.com:[1.2.3.4] > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, This isn't the right place to ask this question. Irregardless of that, since you are using supervise to manage the daemon, try the following: svc -h /path/to/service/directory OR svc -a /path/to/service/directory If neither of those work, you can restart the daemon altogether svc -d /path/to/service/directory followed by svc -u /path/to/service/directory ~Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:16:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76615106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E858FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3541B1CEA4; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:16:49 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:01:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA0177888C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA0177888C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121901.15571.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Luca Presotto Subject: Re: selected port (devel/root) is marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:16:50 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 16:59:48 Luca Presotto wrote: > Hi, > I often use have to use root a program that has been ported to > freebsd. > If I try portinstall or I go into the directory and do make /make > install I get "selected port is marked as broken: Does not compile" > Or maybe a slightly different error with the same meaning.(I'm not on > that machine now so I cannot cut and paste) > That's ok, but I want to have root on freebsd to be able to use that > machine more often. > I downloaded the sources from root.cern.ch then I tried to compile them. > The suggested way is to use a provided script where you type the OS and > the arch of your machine and it sets up everything for you. > But this script supports only freebsd4/5/6, not 7.0 which I'm currently > using. > I tried telling him "it's 6" but then when compiling I get some errors, > as announced by the previous messages! > > What can I try to be able to compile it? > > Will that be hard to do? It fails on gcc3 specific classes. FreeBSD 7 uses gcc 4.x, so the problem lies with root developers. Or...you could install lang/gcc34, then: make -DTRYBROKEN CC=gcc34 CXX=g++34 I'm not sure it'll work though. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:16:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1C410656CB for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA23D8FC5B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69A31CF2C; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:16:49 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:16:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121916.47569.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:16:56 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 15:28:25 Leslie Jensen wrote: > The compile error I get is > > Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted > > Any suggestions? Details maybe? Just one line that's a pretty generic error message, that's likely to be caused by system limits, isn't gonna get you much help. The entire compilation line, the failure up until make returns control back to the shell, that's what you'll need to provide at minimum. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:21:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835B81065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:21:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ds@ongame.com.br) Received: from data1.poli.usp.br (data1.poli.usp.br [143.107.106.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817978FC1D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ds@ongame.com.br) Received: from [192.168.1.67] ([189.78.112.251]) by data1.poli.usp.br with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:21:25 -0300 Message-ID: <47D81F25.70304@ongame.com.br> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:21:25 -0300 From: Vinicius Vianna User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7FAD2.8010907@netmediaservices.net> <47D81160.2060301@datapipe.com> In-Reply-To: <47D81160.2060301@datapipe.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2008 18:21:25.0471 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1CD9EF0:01C8846D] Cc: Victor Farah Subject: Re: QMail Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:21:29 -0000 Paul A. Procacci wrote: > Victor Farah wrote: >> Hello >> I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my >> /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM >> qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I >> made. I start qmail using supervise scripts. >> > Hello, > > This isn't the right place to ask this question. Irregardless of > that, since you are using supervise to manage the daemon, try the > following: > > svc -h /path/to/service/directory > > OR > > svc -a /path/to/service/directory > ~Paul I Agree, this would be better posted to a qmail list, but anyway: I think -ALRM tells qmail to re-run the queue, what you need is to send a HUP signal to the qmail-send, like "pkill -HUP qmail-send", so it will read the control files again. Have you read the Life With Qmail docs? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:23:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F951065679 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBF28FC15 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so3004875wfa.7 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=bPAXIJ8eC4DHJ0GvTJSTqH71eXP1/KnZHqRMn+D3oLk=; b=XdFtewkAOO6tnv0CFVOj4rlihwwxGyVUfPbhnLUALb86rYOEkUXiQmH0ryQDtevwfHi+Aake6DaHu3DhcQ8Ee1R23PVfsGmonjBVoKyhrDWkRhM4woxcUEwA2p/79x3cnrujpBYusoqSEcAKGCfkITLqsy83nTLJBccDNmVijUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ptfmN0tUqV9eB3zb9lL0xnjAsL6Btk6IR2QyzMdoRhr23GSgrBHt/ZcMCB46qmx5Htyeg3qVhSaNudOFFDkPyVUWJ29fHDcK9qQSekxUq91e0YwO5h9JIRd9Nlspg/v/OQct0/dcMZjh+R2qA1ax8/txMQTvCTv3hL4TuvscWbo= Received: by 10.142.101.17 with SMTP id y17mr3773379wfb.20.1205346220946; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.237.12 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <539c60b90803121123p1c4e670bx4a7b5348413f8634@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:23:40 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200803120146.14003.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <539c60b90803111715g5fbbdd0cg4ce817ef72a8161d@mail.gmail.com> <200803120146.14003.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 388b730c94f094c9 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: how to get make to run a script before each build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:23:42 -0000 On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Mel wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 01:15:52 Steve Franks wrote: > > I'd like to keep track of how many times I've run make for a given > > source. I'm sure someone knows how to get make to run a script before > > doing anything else, but using the regular build rules (aka. only if a > > source file has changed). Of course typing any permutation of this > > question into google gives me 10^life of universe in microseconds > > hits. > > mysource.c.o: > count=`cat /var/db/makecounter.${.IMPSRC}` > count=$$(($$count+1)) > echo $$count >/var/db/makecounter.${.IMPSRC} > ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -c ${.IMPSRC} > > or something to that effect, key being, change/override the compilation rule > for your specific or all files. > Default single/double suffix rules are in /usr/share/mk/sys.mk. > -- > Mel > > Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules > and never get to the software part. > Ah! Sorry, I was asking for the make rule, not the script. Which is to say, what am I doing wrong here: %.elf: $(TARGET)BuildNum $(AOBJARM) $(AOBJ) $(COBJARM) $(COBJ) $(CPPOBJ) $(CPPOBJARM) $(LIBS) ... #increment build number $(TARGET)BuildNum: %$(TARGET)BuildNum : *.h *.hpp *.c *.cpp btracer $(TARGET) gives: gmake: *** No rule to make target `*.h', needed by `MainBuildNum'. Stop. Thanks, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:24:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E34C1065674 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595148FC2A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CIOZP1056782; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:24:36 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2CIOZP1056782 Message-ID: <47D81FDB.9080907@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:24:27 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Laszlo Nagy References: <47D80366.5040206@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <47D80366.5040206@shopzeus.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5E58F7FDB75ECCC2C3069F7F" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:24:36 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6212/Wed Mar 12 16:26:20 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List of active users, logged in with gdm X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:24:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5E58F7FDB75ECCC2C3069F7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Laszlo Nagy wrote: > I would like to get the list of the users who are actively logged in=20 > remotely with gdm, along with their IP address. The commands 'w' and=20 > 'users' does not work. What is the right command to get this list? Let me turn that question around slightly: How can I get gdm(8) to record user logins in /var/run/utmp ? It's the utmp file that commands like w(1) and users(1) read in order to present the list of logged-in users. As far as I know this is the only effective means the system uses to record who is logged in when -- I'm not aware of any gdm(1) specific equivalent. Now, in order for a login to be recorded in utmp(5) it should suffice to have a line like: session required pam_lastlog.so no_fail in the appropriate file under /etc/pam.d or /usr/local/etc/pam.d I'm using /etc/pam.d/xdm as a reference -- xdm(8) is functionally similar to gdm(8) and I'd think it would have a very similar PAM configuration. However I haven't positively verified that, and you'ld do well to search for PAM-related info in gdm documentation and so forth. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5E58F7FDB75ECCC2C3069F7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEUEAREIAAYFAkfYH+MACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyBZwCfZF3LpN2W0TsukIMpG667zrdi ufoAmJ5u81UrwyUPvesngch2DanjyBA= =MCCT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5E58F7FDB75ECCC2C3069F7F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:26:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AB71065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACCF8FC39 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819631CF31; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:26:16 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:26:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121926.15130.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Jerry McAllister , Bill Moran Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:26:17 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 16:27:36 Bill Moran wrote: > I don't know of anywhere in the FreeBSD base system > that the term "superuser" is used In the kernel even! suser(9), suser_cred(9), vfs_suser(9) -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:44:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E601106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx06.cern.ch [137.138.166.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2864C8FC20 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -51 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX06 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg44.cern.ch ([137.138.137.146]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:56 +0100 Received: from cernfe11.cern.ch ([137.138.140.36]) by cernxchg44.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:56 +0100 Received: from lxplus218.cern.ch (137.138.4.39) by smtp.cern.ch (137.138.140.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:56 +0100 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:53 +0100 From: Luca Presotto X-X-Sender: presotto@lxplus218.cern.ch To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200803121901.15571.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Message-ID: References: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA0177888C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <200803121901.15571.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2008 18:44:56.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[2AECEC00:01C88471] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: selected port (devel/root) is marked as broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:44:59 -0000 On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Mel wrote: > It fails on gcc3 specific classes. FreeBSD 7 uses gcc 4.x, so the problem lies > with root developers. > Or...you could install lang/gcc34, then: > make -DTRYBROKEN CC=gcc34 CXX=g++34 > > I'm not sure it'll work though. Well, on other OSes they have been compiling new releases with gcc4.2 without any problems for months, so it's not a gcc problem. I have discovered that someone has already submitted a case to the root developing team in middle january. They think the problem lies within the gcc command line options, but from that moment on no new updates are available. I renewed the request to them. So that now they will know that there are 2 people using both root and fbsd! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:49:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EC4106570A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.ipv6.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:100:1:219:d1ff:fe6a:ef49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A288FC19 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:49:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-82-135-9-51.dynamic.mnet-online.de [82.135.9.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2CInVmI066537 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48631130CDD for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6213/Wed Mar 12 18:18:10 2008 on anny.lostinspace.de X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at idefix.lan Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BneWRU2TuNem for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.151] (idefix.idefix.lan [192.168.0.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10E83130CE2 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D825B6.1050207@fechner.net> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:26 +0100 From: Matthias Fechner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (anny.lostinspace.de [80.190.182.2]); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:49:32 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on anny.lostinspace.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Source Upgrade to FreeBSD 7 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:49:40 -0000 Hi, I cvsup the RELENG_7_0 tree today and tried to build the system with make buildworld but I got the following error message: cc -O1 -pipe -march=pentiumpro -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5 -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1 -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/roken -I. -I/usr/local/include -DOPENLDAP=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../include -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -o ipropd-master ipropd_master.o -lkadm5srv -lhdb -lkrb5 -lroken /usr/obj/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../lib/libvers/libvers.a -lasn1 -lcrypto -lcrypt -lcom_err -lldap -llber /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libldap.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libldap.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) /usr/local/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_set_tmp_rsa_callback' ... *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master. *** Error code 1 How can I solve that? Thanks, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:56:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D12106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@bestunion.it) Received: from aa002msb.fastweb.it (aa002msb.fastweb.it [85.18.95.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F7F8FC14 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:56:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@bestunion.it) Received: from mail.bestunion.it (85.18.250.114) by aa002msb.fastweb.it (8.0.013.5) id 47CFF4A800C03B36 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:35 +0100 Received: from [192.168.33.30] (nbcommit.home.commit.it [192.168.33.30] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.bestunion.it (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CIiYW5088638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from aturetta@bestunion.it) Message-ID: <47D82486.5060402@bestunion.it> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:22 +0100 From: Angelo Turetta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on mail.bestunion.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: UFS2 optimization for many small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:56:36 -0000 I recently upgraded the disk of my mail server. The server was initially installed with a single 36GB RAID1 volume with FreeBSD 5 (summer 2004). Over the years I upgraded to FreeBSD 6, and some months ago I added another 36GB RAID1 volume and one 72GB RAID1 volume. I then proceeded to copy my cyrus-imapd partition from /usr/local/mail (on /dev/da0s1f) to the new 76GB /mail (/dev/da2s1d). During this copy I noticed the disk usage of the mailboxes (as reported by du(8)) growing about 20% larger in the process. Please note that cyrus stores mailboxes with 1 file per message, 1 directory per IMAP-folder, and the moved files are in the order of the hundred-thousands, with half of them less than 8 KB large. I tried understanding where the difference was, but I cannot work-out any cause in the file systems: [root@mail /data]# disklabel da0s1 # /dev/da0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 524288 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776 b: 4142832 524288 swap c: 71119692 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 4194304 4667120 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 1048576 8861424 4.2BSD 2048 16384 8 f: 61209692 9910000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 [root@mail /data]# disklabel da2s1 # /dev/da2s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 142253248 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 142253248 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 What can I look at, now? Should I decide to reformat my disk, what newfs parameters you'd advice for my case? Thanks, Angelo. PS: here follows the disk definitions: why the disk formatted during the initial FreeBSD5 setup (da0) has a different geometry than the one formatted later with FreeBSD6 (da1, hardware identical to da0)? Maybe this is influencing the block occupation? --------------------------------------------------------------------- [root@mail /data]# fdisk /dev/da0 ******* Working on device /dev/da0 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=4427 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=4427 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 71119692 (34726 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [root@mail /data]# fdisk /dev/da1 ******* Working on device /dev/da1 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=8716 heads=255 sectors/track=32 (8160 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=8716 heads=255 sectors/track=32 (8160 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 32, size 71122528 (34727 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 32 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [root@mail /data]# fdisk /dev/da2 ******* Working on device /dev/da2 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=17433 heads=255 sectors/track=32 (8160 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=17433 heads=255 sectors/track=32 (8160 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 32, size 142253248 (69459 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 32 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:57:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574F71065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joe.Doll@IFR-Everywhere.com) Received: from pop.ecentral.com (emu.ecentral.com [216.38.223.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4262E8FC26 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joe.Doll@IFR-Everywhere.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.ecentral.com [127.0.0.1]) by pop.ecentral.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F2B57C6 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:38:07 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pop.ecentral.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (emu.ecentral.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 11510-01-2 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:38:06 -0600 (MDT) Received: from c5 (unknown [74.92.215.126]) by pop.ecentral.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F6457B3 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:38:06 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:37:48 -0700 From: Joe Doll X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.07) Professional Organization: Colorcom X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1035372705.20080312123748@IFR-Everywhere.com> To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 2003.09.17 on emu Cc: Subject: Installation sticks on probing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joe Doll List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:57:57 -0000 Hi, I was trying to install BSD 6.3. During the probing process, the probe sticks (forever) when it sees the HD controller which is an Intergrated Technology Express ITE IT8212 ATA. This happened in both a 1998 and 2007 era computer. The hardware manual says that the card is supported. Is there some keystroke or command that will make BSD skip pass the probing? The Linux Slax Live 5.1.7b disk will boot and see the Maxtor 6L200P0 disk drive that is connected to the controller. With Slax, I was previously able to format the Maxtor disk and write files to it, but I'm not able to get past the probing in BSD 6.3. Thanks for you help. -- Best regards, Joe mailto:Joe.Doll@IFR-Everywhere.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:58:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40671065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@violetlan.net) Received: from mail.violetlan.net (www.violetlan.net [80.81.242.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEF88FC2F for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@violetlan.net) Received: from mail.violetlan.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.violetlan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8B31144C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:02:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.violetlan.net (mbali.violetlan.net [10.0.100.150]) by mail.violetlan.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A4E11426 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:02:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 217.41.34.61 (SquirrelMail authenticated user freebsd@violetlan.net) by www.violetlan.net with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:04:07 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <58200.217.41.34.61.1205348647.squirrel@www.violetlan.net> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:04:07 -0000 (GMT) From: "Reinhold" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: removing acl from a directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:58:46 -0000 Hi, I need to remove all the acls from a directory and its files, I've done that successfully using setfacl -bn. This dir is being used by samba but because of the way its now being used we don't need acls on it any more. The thing is every time we create a file either trough samba or from a terminal it adds the acls to the file even after I removed them all. Here is an example of whats happening total 2858 drwxrwx--- 6 user1 test 512B Mar 12 17:54 .svn/ drwxrwx--- 3 user1 test 512B Mar 12 17:54 branches/ drwxrwx--- 3 user1 test 512B Mar 12 17:54 tags/ ----r-----+ 1 root test 0B Mar 12 18:50 test drwxrwx---+ 2 user1 test 512B Mar 12 18:51 test123/ -rwxrwx---+ 1 user1 test 0B Mar 12 18:51 test123_file* drwxrwx--- 5 user1 test 512B Mar 12 17:54 trunk/ -rw-rw---- 1 user1 test 2.7M Mar 12 17:43 trunk.zip Our main problem is the that if the system creates a file or folder it is just adding read permissions to the group Also as you can see the names with the + in them have been created after I removed all the acls. test was created by me from within a shell and test123 was done trough samba. What information do I need to share with you all to see if we can fix this? Best regards Reinhold From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 18:58:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C07B1065675 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACAA8FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274981CEB2; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:58:58 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:58:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <101567640802270431h69e443c9n63090e4b260f3a7b@mail.gmail.com> <200803061938.35765.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <101567640803120817rb72c297q498b2743bcf2e2d4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <101567640803120817rb72c297q498b2743bcf2e2d4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121958.56803.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Simon Street Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2+PHP+700 sites = DNS Issues? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:58:59 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 16:17:48 Simon Street wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Mel wrote: > > On Thursday 06 March 2008 12:12:05 Simon Street wrote: > > > I've copied resolv.conf to /usr/local/etc and HostnameLookups is > > > already enabled, no joy :( (Have restarted apache also). > > > > Hmm hmmm. > > So apache can look up IP's and write hostname into it's log, but php > > can't resolve anything. If it's got something to do with FDSET, then if > > it has no traffic at all, the problem should go away. Does it? Not sure > > if you can test that, but block all incoming traffic for 30 seconds and > > run your test script, shouldn't be too difficult. > > > > Does this work: > > var_dump(gethostbyname("www.example.com")); > > > > Maybe it isn't related to resolving at all - like, are there any > > disallowed functions in your php configuration? > > var_dump.. etc returns string(15) "www.example.com" which means it didn't resolve. > disable_functions shows as none in phpinfo! > > However I've just noticed in the domain logs that its logging IP's not > hostnames, I assume this is wrong given "HostnameLookups On" is in a > conf file that is included by httpd.conf. Is there any way to confirm > at runtime that this directive is being obeyed? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_info.html -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:00:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11C2106569D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [207.181.8.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF9E8FC17 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: by mail.networktest.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 259A378C8C; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.networktest.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from mail.networktest.com (localhost.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2103678C8A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 12.178.36.25 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dnewman@networktest.com) by mail.networktest.com with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <11184.12.178.36.25.1205347265.squirrel@mail.networktest.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:41:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Newman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: source upgrade from 6.3 -> 7.0 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:00:32 -0000 Having trouble upgrading 6.3 to 7.0 from source. This is on a single-CPU amd64 machine. These steps all work OK: 1. cd /usr/src 2. cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/local/etc/security-supfile (tag points to RELENG_7_0) 3. make buildworld 4. make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC 5. make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC 6. reboot to single-user mode 7. mount -u / 8. mount -a 9. mergemaster -p But then I do: 10. make installworld and get this error: install: crt1.o: No such file or directory ***Error code 71 crt1.o does exist in /usr/lib. Thanks in advance for any clues on fixing this upgrade. dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:05:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB01065672 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AE28FC34 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB001CEB2; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:04:58 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, stevefranks@ieee.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:04:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <539c60b90803111715g5fbbdd0cg4ce817ef72a8161d@mail.gmail.com> <200803120146.14003.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <539c60b90803121123p1c4e670bx4a7b5348413f8634@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90803121123p1c4e670bx4a7b5348413f8634@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803122004.57433.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: OT: how to get make to run a script before each build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:05:00 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 19:23:40 Steve Franks wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Mel > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 01:15:52 Steve Franks wrote: > > > I'd like to keep track of how many times I've run make for a given > > > source. I'm sure someone knows how to get make to run a script before > > > doing anything else, but using the regular build rules (aka. only if a > > > source file has changed). Of course typing any permutation of this > > > question into google gives me 10^life of universe in microseconds > > > hits. > > > > mysource.c.o: > > count=`cat /var/db/makecounter.${.IMPSRC}` > > count=$$(($$count+1)) > > echo $$count >/var/db/makecounter.${.IMPSRC} > > ${CC} ${CFLAGS} -c ${.IMPSRC} > > > > or something to that effect, key being, change/override the compilation > > rule for your specific or all files. > > Default single/double suffix rules are in /usr/share/mk/sys.mk. > > -- > > Mel > > > > Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules > > and never get to the software part. > > Ah! Sorry, I was asking for the make rule, not the script. Which is > to say, what am I doing wrong here: > > %.elf: $(TARGET)BuildNum $(AOBJARM) $(AOBJ) $(COBJARM) $(COBJ) > $(CPPOBJ) $(CPPOBJARM) $(LIBS) > ... > > #increment build number > $(TARGET)BuildNum: %$(TARGET)BuildNum : *.h *.hpp *.c *.cpp > btracer $(TARGET) > > gives: > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `*.h', needed by `MainBuildNum'. Stop. Sorry, gmake not my cup of tea, but looks like *.h isn't expanded. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:09:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FAF1065675 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:09:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (mailhost.ssr.com [199.4.235.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 074758FC24 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: (qmail 5222 invoked by uid 103); 12 Mar 2008 18:30:25 -0000 Date: 12 Mar 2008 18:30:25 -0000 Message-ID: <20080312183025.5221.qmail@ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <47D81F25.70304@ongame.com.br> (message from Vinicius Vianna on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:21:25 -0300) References: <47D7FAD2.8010907@netmediaservices.net> <47D81160.2060301@datapipe.com> <47D81F25.70304@ongame.com.br> Subject: Re: QMail Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:09:08 -0000 > Paul A. Procacci wrote: > > Victor Farah wrote: > >> Hello > >> I'm running qmail and I created an smtproutes file, inside my > >> /var/qmail/control/ directory. I then sent a killall -ALRM > >> qmail-send, but it doesn't seem like it uses that smtproutes file I > >> made. I start qmail using supervise scripts. > >> > > Hello, > > > > This isn't the right place to ask this question. Irregardless of > > that, since you are using supervise to manage the daemon, try the > > following: > > > > svc -h /path/to/service/directory > > > > OR > > > > svc -a /path/to/service/directory > > ~Paul > > I Agree, this would be better posted to a qmail list, but anyway: > > I think -ALRM tells qmail to re-run the queue, what you need is to send > a HUP signal to the qmail-send, like "pkill -HUP qmail-send", so it will > read the control files again. > Have you read the Life With Qmail docs? See qmail-control(5) and qmail-remote(8). smtproutes is read by qmail-remote not qmail-send. qmail-remote doesn't require a signal since a new instance is started for each delivery. If smtproutes is not working, something else is wrong. Check the syntax of the file (it is described in qmail-remote man page). You may need to use wild cards to handle all instances for that domain name. If that's all fine, then perhaps there's a problem on the remote host. sdb -- sdb@ssr.com Todays Poem: ((12 + 144 + 20 + (3 * 4^(1/2))) / 7) + (5 * 11) = 9^2 + 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:18:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86741106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC888FC2C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE3B5CF3; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:02:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZ0KehI0sp2u; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:01:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EB965C6E; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:01:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <828E6D60-C685-49AA-B0B4-FAD46D6A9DD3@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Angelo Turetta In-Reply-To: <47D82486.5060402@bestunion.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:01:56 -0700 References: <47D82486.5060402@bestunion.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:18:30 -0000 On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Angelo Turetta wrote: > I then proceeded to copy my cyrus-imapd partition from /usr/local/ > mail (on /dev/da0s1f) to the new 76GB /mail (/dev/da2s1d). During > this copy I noticed the disk usage of the mailboxes (as reported by > du(8)) growing about 20% larger in the process. Please note that > cyrus stores mailboxes with 1 file per message, 1 directory per IMAP- > folder, and the moved files are in the order of the hundred- > thousands, with half of them less than 8 KB large. > > I tried understanding where the difference was, but I cannot work- > out any cause in the file systems: I believe Cyrus will create hard links if the same email message is kept in multiple folders. If your copy did not preserve hard and symlinks, the extra space growth might be a result...consider retrying the copy using the options to rsync/tar/whatever to preserve the links. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:19:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72539106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:19:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5618FC1B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from corinth.polands.org ([75.87.219.217]) by hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20080312191942.XUSB5710.hrndva-omta06.mail.rr.com@corinth.polands.org> for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:19:42 +0000 Received: from email.polands.org (ammon.polands.org [172.16.1.7]) by corinth.polands.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CJJfEk059687 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from 208.49.58.254 (SquirrelMail authenticated user djp) by email.polands.org with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:19:41 -0500 (CDT) From: "Doug Poland" To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/6213/Wed Mar 12 12:18:10 2008 on corinth.polands.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Best practice: sendmail and SMTP auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:19:43 -0000 Hello, Not sure if this is the most appropriate place for this question, but since all my servers are FreeBSD 6.x/7.x, I'll give it a go... I am considering setting up SMTP auth on a number of sendmail instances that I control. After much googling and reading, it is not clear to me that a server with SMTP auth configured/enabled can relay mail in both auth and non-auth modes. If one sendmail configuration cannot accommodate both SMTP auth and access.db, does one setup a dedicated SMTP auth host with a SMART_HOST option and feed incoming email to an non-auth instance of sendmail? Sorry if my terminology is ambiguous, I'm not a sendmail professional by day. -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:20:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C871065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883C08FC17 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 30146 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 19:20:15 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 12 Mar 2008 19:20:15 -0000 Message-ID: <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:20 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gligor Lucian References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gligor Lucian wrote: > > David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: >>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? > >> Yes. > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also tried HP officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work with cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, but either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. > Thank you very much for your answer. > All the best, Gligor Lucian. > > > > --------------------------------- > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2CuMz62J6PPcoOkRAunbAJ96TJd3UZsus+NxCwg8gEk5hnap1gCgn+7/ A8QJVMfDqgAY+4WIFXDD0w8= =450A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:21:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972EE1065674 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692FD8FC13 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351481CEB2; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:21:27 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:21:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D825B6.1050207@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: <47D825B6.1050207@fechner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803122021.25842.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Matthias Fechner Subject: Re: Source Upgrade to FreeBSD 7 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:21:28 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 19:49:26 Matthias Fechner wrote: > Hi, > > I cvsup the RELENG_7_0 tree today and tried to build the system with > make buildworld but I got the following error message: > cc -O1 -pipe -march=pentiumpro > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5 > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/asn1 > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/roke >n -I. -I/usr/local/include -DOPENLDAP=1 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H > -I/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../include > -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib -o ipropd-master > ipropd_master.o -lkadm5srv -lhdb -lkrb5 -lroken > /usr/obj/usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master/../../lib/libvers/libvers. >a -lasn1 -lcrypto -lcrypt -lcom_err -lldap -llber > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libssl.so.4, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libldap.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: warning: libcrypto.so.4, needed by > /usr/local/lib/libldap.so, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) > /usr/local/lib/libldap.so: undefined reference to > `SSL_CTX_set_tmp_rsa_callback' > ... > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/kerberos5/libexec/ipropd-master. > *** Error code 1 > > How can I solve that? How ever did you get something in /usr/src looking for /usr/local/lib/*? What's in /etc/make.conf please? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:24:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5AA106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@bestunion.it) Received: from aa001msb.fastweb.it (aa001msb.fastweb.it [85.18.95.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56418FC1B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:23:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aturetta@bestunion.it) Received: from mail.bestunion.it (85.18.250.114) by aa001msb.fastweb.it (8.0.013.5) id 47CFF5C800BAA03F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:23:57 +0100 Received: from [192.168.33.30] (nbcommit.home.commit.it [192.168.33.30] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.bestunion.it (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CJNj41091350 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:23:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from aturetta@bestunion.it) Message-ID: <47D82DB5.1080305@bestunion.it> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:23:33 +0100 From: Angelo Turetta User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <47D82486.5060402@bestunion.it> <828E6D60-C685-49AA-B0B4-FAD46D6A9DD3@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <828E6D60-C685-49AA-B0B4-FAD46D6A9DD3@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on mail.bestunion.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:24:00 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Angelo Turetta wrote: >> I tried understanding where the difference was, but I cannot work-out >> any cause in the file systems: > > I believe Cyrus will create hard links if the same email message is kept > in multiple folders. Do you know if this includes hard-linking multiple copies of the same message received by different users? If it's only for messages in the same user's mailbox, no way incidence can reach 20% in my case. Angelo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:25:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137BE106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:25:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F77E8FC14 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so3535211fka.11 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=KwLGVsLA4Jwrc0FPUe1u4ITM0NHl3JGFUA8a+SumGYE=; b=Ib9lsKWAmCKiCVWyQtrSJHEkwqjE2DK+H/OLT/ssW+qaSLGTNG0uiefcT8oq8/AJUH0qavKGmymmfa2g7xDt6FkbzFJImMbFVsnP0CQo1TGpz0TxdJE1t52fkAwEtAd3iF4Le9xWUBKRoyAaK45FacUIdghve6ETb4iuO/D1E3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JTJ2TAIikIN9ZOPbIArI6UvLuKaZ5YktIcqkDplEVK82kMTgnyhoxXqd2LbBDwmkKNcqQkuku/HFXp/W4V9VpaGSWTtfOlP2fpsGmh5OFOAydVVO7uH0/IMIVVrhxrUUalUT670Ly0cpRL2H4I20xuvitIHMJPS++vAzmSaOa6Y= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr20595548buc.11.1205349955021; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.160.5 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0803121225v5a44876am64e7b89494c77e4c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:25:54 -0700 From: "Kevin Downey" To: "Chuck Robey" In-Reply-To: <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, Gligor Lucian Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:25:57 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gligor Lucian wrote: > > > > David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: > >>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? > > > >> Yes. > > > > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I > can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on > FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other > systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also tried HP > officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work with > cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, but > either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but > nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. > > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear > about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. > > > Thank you very much for your answer. > > All the best, Gligor Lucian. > > I have CUPS working on my laptop and desktop. I don't have a local printer installed. I am using CUPS to access printers shared from a windows machine. Works fine, except this morning I noticed a pdf not printing correctly but I believe that is Evince's fault. -- The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of personal relationships. Fisheye From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:29:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB96106567C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904758FC22 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAD28102; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:29:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BCAF6DA239; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:29:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:29:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <3cf9f8920803101018i573a5c26l986b9508495fcd5a@mail.gmail.com> <444pbcdvwj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <3cf9f8920803120530k7f6420bfl5aa203864c058c90@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3cf9f8920803120530k7f6420bfl5aa203864c058c90@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1613318.RVZF690VW6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803121429.14760.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Snow Mountains Subject: Re: no ad1s3a,b,d... on ad1s3 after bsdlabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:29:13 -0000 --nextPart1613318.RVZF690VW6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 12 March 2008 07:30:34 am Snow Mountains wrote: > 2008/3/12, Lowell Gilbert : > > "Snow Mountains" writes: > > > I try to understand bsdlabel. > > > I have former fat slice (ad1s3) on my disk and I want to make several > > > BSD partitions on it. I did this: > > > > > > # dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ad1s3 bs=3D1k count=3D1024 > > > 1024+0 records in > > > 1024+0 records out > > > 1048576 bytes transferred in 0.318986 secs (3287217 bytes/sec) > > > # bsdlabel -w ad1s3 > > > # bsdlabel -e ad1s3 > > > (edit) > > > # bsdlabel ad1s3 > > > # /dev/ad1s3: > > > 8 partitions: > > > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > > > a: 10000000 16 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > > b: 10000000 10000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > > c: 47616660 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, > > > don't edit d: 27616644 20000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > > # newfs -U /dev/ad1s3a > > > newfs: /dev/ad1s3a: could not find special device > > > # ls /dev/ad1s3* > > > /dev/ad1s3 > > > # > > > > > > What I miss because I don't have ad1s3a,b,d? > > > If repeat same procedure on disk (big file) mounted as /dev/md0, a s= ee > > > /dev/md0,a,b,d,e... after this group of commands. > > > > On what version of FreeBSD? > > This happens on: > > # uname -r > 6.2-RELEASE-p11 > > SergiM Did you delete and recreate the slice or is it still marked as FAT when you= do=20 fdisk /dev/ad1 If it's still a FAT/DOS slice you might try deleting and recreating it as a= =20 native FreeBSD slice, I'm not entirely sure putting a bsdlabel on a FAT sli= ce=20 is going to do the right thing (although I could be wrong here) =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart1613318.RVZF690VW6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBH2C8KJvkB8SevrssRAmQKAJ9VWTI4Q00WQm/OOxshQyX761OHuwCeLs31 GcOIZwbob0md6SPYlaf1XXo= =5Ri/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1613318.RVZF690VW6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:33:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42971065673; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailsort@magnolia.cisdata.net) Received: from dagobah.cisdata.net (dagobah-out.cisdata.net [65.218.234.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E3E8FC1F; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:33:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailsort@magnolia.cisdata.net) Received: from magnolia.internal.cisdata.net ([192.168.44.86] helo=magnolia.cisdata.net) by dagobah.cisdata.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JZWG4-0005pp-LN; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:05:00 -0700 Received: from mailsort by magnolia.cisdata.net with local (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1JZWG4-000HyJ-CO; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:05:00 -0700 To: "George Fazio" From: "Evan T" Message-Id: Sender: mailsort Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:05:00 -0700 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 and SATA DVD Drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:33:18 -0000 unsubscribe ==================== Evan T. iHOUSE Customer Service support@ihouseweb.com Did you know that iHOUSE Web Solutions has one of the most powerful IDX search solutions on the market? Connected to over 320 MLSs nationwide, IDXPro has become one of the best lead generators on the web. Turn your website into a lead generating machine - Take a test drive today at no cost! http://www.ihouseweb.com/Products/IDXPro On 3/11/2008 20:10:07 "George Fazio" submitted the following request: >Ticket Id: 1565857 >Assigned CSR: Evan T > >Mike Garrett wrote: >> Hello, does FreeBSD 7 support booting from SATA DVD drives? When I tried >> 6.2, it didn't work, and I was hoping it has been fixed by now. >> >> Thanks for any info, >> >> Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >I just built a machine with 7.0R AMD64 and had no trouble booting from >the Asus SATA DVD drive that was in it. The motherboard was an Intel >P45GC - ICH7 chipset. > >George > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:37:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E611065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CEC8FC16 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-83591.home.otenet.gr [87.203.79.213]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m2CJblCf010816; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:37:47 +0200 Message-ID: <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:37:47 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Robey References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, Gligor Lucian Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:37:55 -0000 Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gligor Lucian wrote: > >> David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: >> >>>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? >>>> >>> Yes. >>> > > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I > can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on > FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other > systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also tried HP > officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work with > cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, but > either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but > nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. > > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear > about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. > > >> Thank you very much for your answer. >> All the best, Gligor Lucian. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> I have cups working on my system, printing on locally attached USB printers. I have followed the instructions in dekstopBSD wiki: http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing (though I used ports and not packages) I still have some issues if I disconnect / reconnect the printer, the permissions are not set correctly (although devfs is running). I might be missing some configuration step, but have not researched further yet. Generally speaking, printing works. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:43:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0701065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from top_gun_canada@yahoo.com) Received: from web30904.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30904.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 038998FC22 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from top_gun_canada@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 48138 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Mar 2008 19:43:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=h9yK0v4GQtL5a6m9T6O7+0TECIvqHrA9m3joQKWbtiKl9I9L4CrWr5QC1Tk3VE6ii4R7wHroYsOq9nIpZNc/bnAXERv8YH5yiNIqpBqOrUwxlBP9SyW90Q4UBO9cCl5eDC24hVfLY91FMM1ekFPWh5A4HCWasjbkI9W9dXSsnVk=; X-YMail-OSG: 7xusm0QVM1kP60C4Sc_27SmYwvrc4xqe4Dn6nBR.ViLHVzeJ.my8ASGVzpOzw3xT4iPdh3ERB92UqArepDp1CiRrLl73CCDDCWck4jh3XkxxmiOYKM0- Received: from [70.74.28.140] by web30904.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:43:21 PDT Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:43:21 -0700 (PDT) From: B J To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <279276.48036.qm@web30904.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: ACPI Problem: "acpi_tz0:_TMP value is absurd" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:43:22 -0000 I located a file for upgrading the BIOS for my Compaq machine but it requires Windows to install it. I deleted the Windows that came with the machine several months ago, so, for now, that option is out. I created a file with the following commands: sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1 sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate=1800 sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=0 and run it right after logging in as root using: source xxxx where xxxx is the file name. The message: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-269.8C) still appears, but not as often. I could, of course, adjust it later if temperature might become a problem but, for now, the machine isn't on long enough for that to be a concern. It still doesn't fix the problem of an incorrect temperature, but at least I can read my monitor without it being cluttered with those messages. BMJ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:44:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8C51065674 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0FB68FC2D for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 20385 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2008 19:44:11 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 12 Mar 2008 19:44:11 -0000 Message-ID: <47D83127.8000701@chuckr.org> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:38:15 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org, Gligor Lucian Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:44:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > > > Chuck Robey wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Gligor Lucian wrote: >> >>> David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at >>> 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: >>> >>>>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? >>>>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >> >> You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I >> can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on >> FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other >> systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also >> tried HP >> officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work with >> cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, but >> either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but >> nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. >> >> Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear >> about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. >> >> >>> Thank you very much for your answer. >>> All the best, Gligor Lucian. >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! >>> Search. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> > I have cups working on my system, printing on locally attached USB > printers. > I have followed the instructions in dekstopBSD wiki: > > http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing > > (though I used ports and not packages) > > I still have some issues if I disconnect / reconnect the printer, the > permissions are not set correctly (although devfs is running). > I might be missing some configuration step, but have not researched > further yet. > Generally speaking, printing works. > OK, well, maybe I'm wrong, I'll go take a look. As to that other respondent, the job of doing non-local printers needs much more trivial drivers, so yeah, that always has worked. I had looked about on Google, followed a ton of differing instructions, and hadn't had it come near working yet. But, I will go take another look at this URL, yes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2DEnz62J6PPcoOkRAikGAJ9F/coCFoW64xeWaa8/hA5orR9dTwCaAryV tWWpQg+S3Xwka5bgtSRcfnU= =LxxN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 19:50:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B8D1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C478FC19 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CJnreZ059141; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:49:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080312145003.025592a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:51:39 -0500 To: "David Newman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <11184.12.178.36.25.1205347265.squirrel@mail.networktest.co m> References: <11184.12.178.36.25.1205347265.squirrel@mail.networktest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080311-0, 03/11/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: source upgrade from 6.3 -> 7.0 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:50:16 -0000 At 01:41 PM 3/12/2008, David Newman wrote: >Having trouble upgrading 6.3 to 7.0 from source. This is on a single-CPU >amd64 machine. > >These steps all work OK: > >1. cd /usr/src > >2. cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/local/etc/security-supfile (tag points to RELENG_7_0) > >3. make buildworld > >4. make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC > >5. make installkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC > >6. reboot to single-user mode > >7. mount -u / > >8. mount -a > >9. mergemaster -p > >But then I do: > >10. make installworld > >and get this error: > >install: crt1.o: No such file or directory >***Error code 71 > >crt1.o does exist in /usr/lib. > >Thanks in advance for any clues on fixing this upgrade. > >dn > > I had a similar problem with one server I upgraded this way too. I was running the 7.0 kernel with 6.3 world. I rebuilt world after cleaning everything and the next installworld went fine. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:00:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF401065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADF88FC15; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47D8365D.8090102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:00:29 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Maness References: <20080312083150.G11508@ns1.kq6up.org> In-Reply-To: <20080312083150.G11508@ns1.kq6up.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD List Subject: Re: libm.so.4 not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:34 -0000 Chris Maness wrote: > How do I build 7.0 with libm.so.4 compatibility built in? I find it on > my 6.3 system. But not on my upgraded 7.0 system. > > in reference to: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2006-May/122264.html > > I see that I should be able to add the variable: > > COMPAT4X=yes > > to /etc/make.conf but this flag is not recognized by the Makefile in > /usr/src/. Has this been obsoleted? What is the correct way to add > this compatibility if possible? Yes, it is obsoleted. Install the compat4x port (and make sure your kernel has COMPAT_FREEBSD4). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:18:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B802A106566C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C28F8FC1F for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1C05D1A; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:18:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rNTifmtOscMu; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:18:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31D565D0B; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:18:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: From: Chuck Swiger To: Angelo Turetta In-Reply-To: <47D82DB5.1080305@bestunion.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:18:11 -0700 References: <47D82486.5060402@bestunion.it> <828E6D60-C685-49AA-B0B4-FAD46D6A9DD3@mac.com> <47D82DB5.1080305@bestunion.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:18:16 -0000 On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Angelo Turetta wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: >> On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Angelo Turetta wrote: >>> I tried understanding where the difference was, but I cannot work- >>> out any cause in the file systems: >> I believe Cyrus will create hard links if the same email message is >> kept in multiple folders. > > Do you know if this includes hard-linking multiple copies of the > same message received by different users? If it's only for messages > in the same user's mailbox, no way incidence can reach 20% in my case. That's a good question. I don't see any reason why this couldn't include the same message received by different users, too.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:28:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D8A106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2FF8FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix, from userid 106) id 9C8BA618B; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9E06167 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from danielby@localhost) by torus.slightlystrange.org (8.14.2/8.13.4/Submit) id m2CKSqIO030339 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:52 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:52 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080312202851.GA29909@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080312091427.GA47661@torus.slightlystrange.org> <200803121009.12536.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803121009.12536.jmc-freebsd@milibyte.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE i386 Subject: Re: Installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:28:57 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:09:12AM +0000, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008, Daniel Bye wrote: >=20 > > I think it fair to say that most people will use ports to compile and > > install software, rather than relying on the packages on the release > > ISOs, for the simple reason that the ports tree is a moving target - > > the packages included with any particular release are out of date > > (as a set, if not individually) quite quickly, because the porters > > do a fantastic job of adding new software and updating existing ports. > > > > So, my suggestion (as an old hack who's been around for almost a > > decade ;-) would be to familiarise yourself with the ports tree > > and all its magic - you'll probably find yourself using it in > > preference to precompiled packages. The handbook is the best place > > to start, as ever. >=20 > I agree that there are advantages in using ports to ensure things are kep= t up=20 > to date but using the packages supplied with the release can be an advant= age=20 > for a newcomer to FreeBSD. Of course, a point I realised I missed in my original reply. > The ports system can be quite daunting until one has become familiar with= the=20 > system especially if even just one of the ports fails to build. A new use= r=20 > probably won't have the expertise to recognise and fix the cause of the= =20 > problem. Installing packages from the CD's pretty well ensures that the n= ew=20 > user can get a new system up and running without complication. Many new u= sers=20 > would prefer a slightly out of date system that works instead of struggli= ng=20 > to fix problems in a totally unfamiliar system. When I first started to u= se=20 > FreeBSD I relied on the packages on the CDs, as I gained more familiarity= I=20 > was much more confident in using ports for the applications that weren't= =20 > available as precompiled packages. Yes, of course; you make several good points, Mike. I hope my suggestion didn't come over as sounding like ports is the only way - as you point out below, packages are the sane option for most of us mortals for huge collections of software like KDE. Speaking for myself (it's all I'm qualified to do, after all), I will say that I found the learning process in FreeBSD to be on the whole straight forward and very enjoyable - I emigrated from Linuxland after a particularly frustrating problem for which I got nothing but scorn for being a n00b on the newsgroups (I know most Linux communities these days are not like that - but back then, the one I went to for help most certainly was). All I wanted to do was learn about something other than Windows. So at the recommendation of a couple of colleagues, I tried 4.0-RELEASE, joined this mailing list, and never looked back. From the first day, I can remember being blown away by how easy it was to install from the ports - it resolves dependencies for you? Yeah, right... wait, it's resolving dependencies for me! After wrestling with RPMs, who wouldn't love that? (Again, I know a hell of a lot of work has gone into the various software management tools available for Linuxes, but I still haven't found one I like as much as our own ports.) I could bang on for hours about how much I enjoy using FreeBSD (it has been my primary desktop OS since 4.2, my business is based on FreeBSD VPS services, I supply FreeBSD Internet appliances to my clients, blah blah blah) and about how elegant and well thought out it is. It has its glitches, sure, but it's a huge evolving system. Such an immense amount of intelligence and talent has gone into making FreeBSD what it=20 is, and a good proportion of that intelligence and talent is available=20 at first hand for free on the lists - in my experience, you just don't get that very often. Anyway - to the OP - my apologies for hijacking your thread, and welcome aboard. Keep at it, you'll love it, I'm sure. Keep asking questions -=20 this list is a fantastic resource for newcomers and more experienced users alike. > Although I'm now quite comfortable building from ports I still use precom= piled=20 > packages where they are available because I've got a relatively low power= ed=20 > PC which makes very heavy going with the bigger ports (e.g. gcc, firefox,= =20 > KDE) Indeed. I'll never get back those days waiting for KDE and OO.o to build... Right, that's me done ;-) Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFH2D0Dixf5fBYiFmoRAlDHAKCE1TGRkhaEpvgWIqR+X9QWA+Ny/QCfTs1q J/inc9yVBOIyY/ugi5Kk2AU= =76xb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:31:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 852DF1065670 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp224.math.arizona.edu (smtp224.math.arizona.edu [128.196.224.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DFF8FC29 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZXbJ-000240-UH for FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:31:05 -0700 Received: from 71-220-166-120.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.166.120] helo=.domain.actdsltmp) by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZXay-00022Z-3d; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:30:40 -0700 Message-ID: <47D83D17.1060601@math.arizona.edu> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:29:11 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Robey References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting .domain.actdsltmp is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org, Gligor Lucian Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:31:06 -0000 Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Gligor Lucian wrote: > >> David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: >> >>>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? >>>> >>> Yes. >>> > > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I > can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on > FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other > systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also tried HP > officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work with > cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, but > either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but > nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. > > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear > about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. > > Please do not spread disinformation. Of course CUPS works on FreeBSD as well as thee other spooling systems PDQ, LPD, and LPRng. Cheers, Predrag >> Thank you very much for your answer. >> All the best, Gligor Lucian. >> >> >> >> --------------------------------- >> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFH2CuMz62J6PPcoOkRAunbAJ96TJd3UZsus+NxCwg8gEk5hnap1gCgn+7/ > A8QJVMfDqgAY+4WIFXDD0w8= > =450A > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:42:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6251065678 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1D18FC2B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so934480anc.13 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.195.15 with SMTP id s15mr17290650anf.17.1205354573787; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm23254979anc.32.2008.03.12.13.42.52 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:42:42 -0400 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080312164242.565fcd1b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD-6.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/i3Qw_507DIgF2JgXuiOSgzl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:42:55 -0000 --Sig_/i3Qw_507DIgF2JgXuiOSgzl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:20 -0400 Chuck Robey wrote: > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on > FreeBSD, I can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get > it to work on FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to > one of my other systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, > but I've also tried HP officejets, and I just can't get locally > attached printers to work with cups. I can get them to work with > things like apsfilter very well, but either someone is going to have > to fix the Cups port (it builds, but nothing locally runs) or stop > recommending it. >=20 > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to > hear about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no > success. I have HPLIP working with CUPs perfectly. I even got it to FAX. The printer is accessed via a wireless network too. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net A pipe gives a wise man time to think and a fool something to stick in his mouth. --Sig_/i3Qw_507DIgF2JgXuiOSgzl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkfYQEIACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMnJ5gCgtnaFmtYb5ZrK1JvZxhvryi0o vHQAn2ss2jRX64H3RvTmaf9+hnvX1Ulc =O5NU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/i3Qw_507DIgF2JgXuiOSgzl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:44:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9611065672 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:44:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2ED8FC24 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:43:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so369429uge.37 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:43:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Ft6ZC1CLW2jtfc/0TQ+tEQTobJAfbXLv5lUGG54B1Dc=; b=J3PLKMs3REkHjM9rwBXJTCfWQH1rvZyxwQakHCNpVbD8P7/fih5MLEvMG7SSJPqUuflr3zrQ4O6Dt73Pa/tSMa3S3caxpHSa7eK54mF+wYNNKLy4GwW+m2748ja20ChDxL0J/SSsghKG6/jal6d5W9cUHL8lr/wkMYZ3RAxqtrs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=U3jo9QbtR+L7VPPqYsW9LBIJyyaMkqcUh+X8ItiwFcYQQhEuf1JgZkTI1cnufQFtY2wgIhmvrRj+lEvEBOrZ9z60DLhwoJCDRY0FSwZp5Yuv3PIbw99u6MZ6UrdDqqI3kve3ZIhqwdzBQwmpipdvSoWUY5PMUHREXZnlHyEZgGI= Received: by 10.151.12.1 with SMTP id p1mr4803900ybi.83.1205354264286; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.16 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c0b01820803121337s17f256f7j47402c84610c9b07@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:37:44 -0400 From: "Alexander Sack" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3c0b01820803121329h2c223a6ek66e8f2d4bb7510fe@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3c0b01820803121329h2c223a6ek66e8f2d4bb7510fe@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Switching terminals under VMWare Fusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:44:00 -0000 Btw, the reason why I say its the handling of the ALT key is that I can't get into kdb (ALT-CTLR-ESC, etc.). This is really frustrating! -aps On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > Hello Everydoy: > I apologize if this isn't exactly the right place but I'm out of options! > I've posted on the Fusion community website up on vmware.com but am still > lost. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE under VMWare Fusion on a MBP/Leopard ( > 10.5.1). I've installed the vmware-tools port as well as the tools > shipped with Fusion and made some edits to accommodate 7.0-RELEASE. All > is well minus the fact that either the ALT key or some other issue is > preventing me from switching terminals (ALT-F1, F2, etc.). Has anyone seen > this problem before? If you run Workstation or Fusion have you seen any > issues with switching terminals? > > Any pointers would be much appreciated! > > Thanks! > > -aps > > -- > "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to > what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson > -- "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:54:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EAD106566B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB6F8FC21 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so372673uge.37 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:53:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=ME7JAdrtaZnshX7cnjSesS5EHgG5ohjyb5nlfp1TmME=; b=mmBm7mfFl7uOjmVOGno7NFKCtC89KdvfdYB3ZBdIkFsgrp/5u3QwC0hjPaL/0xM4+hWbx3ZeeQclrY3mydu2mxJPYW5BTcWxSXS6URtjUhqbpRRFfiUUttfCsUS9i/wpoDuTrqkkSkrZaI+yB8QTqd8BAerfanBfZziVFfiI2o0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=X/VRVOZcRrO7iwZoHJKpgNRlovVL38zYWBbPjhlEvXtHoIFIfynvy6pPI73CcQgA5udpwhdahOzmsoziy38LBDZQDTerY3UALOD0Nth+eX9vkroISnKcH9N8lKoYgcSI2aHxb1tFrpzfZ/wFznYmbPk7C0urwq955SduWeFOSeM= Received: by 10.151.60.12 with SMTP id n12mr4791095ybk.97.1205353767639; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.16 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c0b01820803121329h2c223a6ek66e8f2d4bb7510fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:29:27 -0400 From: "Alexander Sack" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Switching terminals under VMWare Fusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:01 -0000 Hello Everydoy: I apologize if this isn't exactly the right place but I'm out of options! I've posted on the Fusion community website up on vmware.com but am still lost. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE under VMWare Fusion on a MBP/Leopard (10.5.1). I've installed the vmware-tools port as well as the tools shipped with Fusion and made some edits to accommodate 7.0-RELEASE. All is well minus the fact that either the ALT key or some other issue is preventing me from switching terminals (ALT-F1, F2, etc.). Has anyone seen this problem before? If you run Workstation or Fusion have you seen any issues with switching terminals? Any pointers would be much appreciated! Thanks! -aps -- "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 20:54:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1661065675 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2C88FC1A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.5.128] (mail8.stratech.com [71.16.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2CKsmhZ061697; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:54:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:54:42 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <3c0b01820803121329h2c223a6ek66e8f2d4bb7510fe@mail.gmail.com> <3c0b01820803121337s17f256f7j47402c84610c9b07@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3c0b01820803121337s17f256f7j47402c84610c9b07@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803121654.42936.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Alexander Sack Subject: Re: Switching terminals under VMWare Fusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:54:50 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 04:37:44 pm Alexander Sack wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > Hello Everydoy: > > I apologize if this isn't exactly the right place but I'm out of > > options! I've posted on the Fusion community website up on vmware.com > > but am still lost. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE under VMWare Fusion on a > > MBP/Leopard ( 10.5.1). I've installed the vmware-tools port as well > > as the tools shipped with Fusion and made some edits to accommodate > > 7.0-RELEASE. All is well minus the fact that either the ALT key or > > some other issue is preventing me from switching terminals (ALT-F1, > > F2, etc.). Has anyone seen this problem before? If you run > > Workstation or Fusion have you seen any issues with switching > > terminals? > > > > Any pointers would be much appreciated! > > > Btw, the reason why I say its the handling of the ALT key is that I > can't get into kdb (ALT-CTLR-ESC, etc.). This is really frustrating! > -aps I just happened to read this from a Workstation VM so I played around with it a bit. The reason ctrl-alt keystrokes don't work is that they never get to the VM. VMware uses them for its own hotkey combos: ctrl-alt = release mouse/keyboard, ctrl-alt-enter = toggle full-screen, ctrl-alt-right = next running VM, etc. I went into the options for VMware (on the host, Windows in my case) and changed the hotkey to ctrl-alt-shift. It didn't take effect immediately, but once I paused my VM, closed VMware and started it back up again I was able to use ctrl-alt combos in my VM. That includes switching to a virtual terminal from X, switching workspaces in xfce (ctrl-alt-left and right), etc. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 21:14:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7F01065672 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1205786958.5801e4@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (3s1.com [209.161.205.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978E68FC1A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david+dated+1205786958.5801e4@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CKnJSL070976 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:49:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1205786958.5801e4@skytracker.ca) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.13.8/8.14.1/Submit) id m2CKnI7U070975 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:49:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1205786958.5801e4@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1205786958.5801e4@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:49:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:49:18 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) From: David Banning X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/6218/Wed Mar 12 15:07:21 2008 on 3s1.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on 3s1.com Cc: Subject: email pop3 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:14:38 -0000 I am using dovecot email on my server - Users can connect via IMAP or POP3. I have a user who is using pop3 but not removing the email from the server - so the email stays on the server, -and- it is collecting on their computer - as the emails build up, will there be a problem with this? For IMAP it stays on the server, so I assume the server will not be presented with any problem - but will the user suffer any problem eventually? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 21:31:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863931065672 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Received: from mail.adventuras.no (mail.adventuras.no [194.63.250.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C4B8FC27 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Received: from ladyda.hovin.local (hjem [84.215.93.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.adventuras.no (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2CLFr3Q054513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:16:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no) Message-ID: <47D84809.7030602@adventuras.no> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:15:53 +0100 From: Lars Kristiansen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080311) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Swiger References: <47D82486.5060402@bestunion.it> <828E6D60-C685-49AA-B0B4-FAD46D6A9DD3@mac.com> <47D82DB5.1080305@bestunion.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Adventuras: du kan filtrere etter AdvSpamScore over 5-10 X-Adventuras-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60) X-MailScanner-From: lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Angelo Turetta , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS2 optimization for many small files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:31:23 -0000 Chuck Swiger skrev: > On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:23 PM, Angelo Turetta wrote: >> Chuck Swiger wrote: >>> On Mar 12, 2008, at 11:44 AM, Angelo Turetta wrote: >>>> I tried understanding where the difference was, but I cannot >>>> work-out any cause in the file systems: >>> I believe Cyrus will create hard links if the same email message is >>> kept in multiple folders. >> >> Do you know if this includes hard-linking multiple copies of the same >> message received by different users? If it's only for messages in the >> same user's mailbox, no way incidence can reach 20% in my case. > > That's a good question. I don't see any reason why this couldn't > include the same message received by different users, too.... It does. You may want to try something like rsync -aH when copying. Regards, Lars From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 22:01:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96907106567C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E67E8FC1A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so388606uge.37 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:01:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=hhyUjxaMfLaZn1jMIwqW1USf2wfvPJ1a3DZRN3/5CTA=; b=h7cH7OFxkxCNF/Rfn0JmTyNQL9tNLZZf1Kgc+MvF/O1qnzcdy4f8nUHt3wSHq0/u6wXEC2TM4gXe9C95XtFHIAD14jbltuSLDMJGAFgv4eM6W81x8aYXwIgbWviYVR7KRNWrOyoEca69gKPmrgP24n1S3ir798dQVVYq96g9+oI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=CDcvgSdU7+w8OigdvpN7y0+dEwp+hDGIQWVq6l3OVEewk0pxJvHmJ82AMKClQ1DoCQAXzE+p4r94zn+fCJJZ384eADPqxCWk4CzLM8TZh0mlgvMExQD9EYJvrNGNvFHYYuFyZ1q0e/I1TqPkDDAs1fRONMKONSaLLcL5RvPWQQU= Received: by 10.151.60.12 with SMTP id n12mr4847290ybk.97.1205359280313; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.16 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c0b01820803121501o45065f61gfba0d0fa8f1e71f1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:01:20 -0400 From: "Alexander Sack" To: "John Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <200803121654.42936.lists@jnielsen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3c0b01820803121329h2c223a6ek66e8f2d4bb7510fe@mail.gmail.com> <3c0b01820803121337s17f256f7j47402c84610c9b07@mail.gmail.com> <200803121654.42936.lists@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching terminals under VMWare Fusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:01:23 -0000 JN: Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, hotkeys on Mac use the Apple button, not ALT so I don't think this applies but I will try to investigate if there is some conflict with ALT and Fusion itself. I can't find anything in Preferences that would lead me to believe that there is a conflict (I do know that normally you have to hit fn+alt/option unless you use an advanced tunable via your .vmx file). Btw, I had this working at some point....hmmmm....I just thought of something...gonna try something else. Thanks! -aps On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:54 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 04:37:44 pm Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Sack > wrote: > > > Hello Everydoy: > > > I apologize if this isn't exactly the right place but I'm out of > > > options! I've posted on the Fusion community website up on vmware.com > > > but am still lost. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE under VMWare Fusion on a > > > MBP/Leopard ( 10.5.1). I've installed the vmware-tools port as well > > > as the tools shipped with Fusion and made some edits to accommodate > > > 7.0-RELEASE. All is well minus the fact that either the ALT key or > > > some other issue is preventing me from switching terminals (ALT-F1, > > > F2, etc.). Has anyone seen this problem before? If you run > > > Workstation or Fusion have you seen any issues with switching > > > terminals? > > > > > > Any pointers would be much appreciated! > > > > > Btw, the reason why I say its the handling of the ALT key is that I > > can't get into kdb (ALT-CTLR-ESC, etc.). This is really frustrating! > > -aps > > I just happened to read this from a Workstation VM so I played around with > it a bit. The reason ctrl-alt keystrokes don't work is that they never > get to the VM. VMware uses them for its own hotkey combos: ctrl-alt = > release mouse/keyboard, ctrl-alt-enter = toggle full-screen, > ctrl-alt-right = next running VM, etc. I went into the options for VMware > (on the host, Windows in my case) and changed the hotkey to > ctrl-alt-shift. It didn't take effect immediately, but once I paused my > VM, closed VMware and started it back up again I was able to use ctrl-alt > combos in my VM. That includes switching to a virtual terminal from X, > switching workspaces in xfce (ctrl-alt-left and right), etc. > > JN > > -- "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 23:28:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABAC1065671 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:28:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CD18FC1A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2CNSIw1007685; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:28:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2CNSE2o007682; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:28:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:28:14 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: David Banning In-Reply-To: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> Message-ID: <20080313002758.V7681@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email pop3 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:28:41 -0000 > I am using dovecot email on my server - Users can connect via IMAP or POP3. > > I have a user who is using pop3 but not removing the email from the > server - so the email stays on the server, -and- it is collecting on their > computer - as the emails build up, will there be a problem with this? > > For IMAP it stays on the server, so I assume the server will not be presented > with any problem - but will the user suffer any problem eventually? all depends how clients are configured. if right - no problems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 23:30:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460151065679 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:30:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@rgbaz.eu) Received: from jasper.secsrv.net (jasper.secsrv.net [66.98.138.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255018FC2B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:30:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@rgbaz.eu) Received: from [77.60.177.2] (helo=[192.168.1.153]) by jasper.secsrv.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZW0X-0006oJ-En; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:48:58 -0400 Message-Id: From: FreeBSD To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200803121926.15130.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:48:35 +0100 References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <200803121926.15130.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - jasper.secsrv.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - rgbaz.eu X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:30:40 -0000 On 12 mrt 2008, at 19:26, Mel wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 16:27:36 Bill Moran wrote: > >> I don't know of anywhere in the FreeBSD base system >> that the term "superuser" is used > > In the kernel even! > suser(9), suser_cred(9), vfs_suser(9) > Have you had a look at 'man su' ? Arno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 00:02:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BBF1065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: from mail.networktest.com (mail.networktest.com [207.181.8.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D048FC14 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dnewman@networktest.com) Received: by mail.networktest.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6696678C8C; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.networktest.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 Received: from mail.networktest.com (localhost.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B1978C8A for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 12.178.36.25 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dnewman@networktest.com) by mail.networktest.com with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <34116.12.178.36.25.1205366526.squirrel@mail.networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080312145003.025592a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> References: <11184.12.178.36.25.1205347265.squirrel@mail.networktest.com> <6.0.0.22.2.20080312145003.025592a8@mail.computinginnovations.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:02:06 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Newman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.10a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: source upgrade from 6.3 -> 7.0 fails SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:02:42 -0000 >>1. cd /usr/src >> >>2. cvsup -g -L 2 /usr/local/etc/security-supfile (tag points to >> RELENG_7_0) >> >>3. make buildworld >> .. >>10. make installworld >> >>and get this error: >> >>install: crt1.o: No such file or directory >>***Error code 71 >> >>crt1.o does exist in /usr/lib. >> >>Thanks in advance for any clues on fixing this upgrade. >> >>dn >> >> > > I had a similar problem with one server I upgraded this way too. I was > running the 7.0 kernel with 6.3 world. I rebuilt world after cleaning > everything and the next installworld went fine. Thanks, that was the problem. After running "make clean" before "make buildworld" the rest of the steps completed successfully. Many thanks! dn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 00:05:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13662106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB448FC37 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:05:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2D05Kmm053823; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:05:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080312190519.0255f878@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:07:06 -0500 To: "Doug Poland" , questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> References: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080312-0, 03/12/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Best practice: sendmail and SMTP auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:05:53 -0000 At 02:19 PM 3/12/2008, Doug Poland wrote: >Hello, > >Not sure if this is the most appropriate place for this question, but >since all my servers are FreeBSD 6.x/7.x, I'll give it a go... > >I am considering setting up SMTP auth on a number of sendmail >instances that I control. After much googling and reading, it is not >clear to me that a server with SMTP auth configured/enabled can relay >mail in both auth and non-auth modes. > >If one sendmail configuration cannot accommodate both SMTP auth and >access.db, does one setup a dedicated SMTP auth host with a SMART_HOST >option and feed incoming email to an non-auth instance of sendmail? > >Sorry if my terminology is ambiguous, I'm not a sendmail professional >by day. > > >-- >Regards, >Doug You can set up sendmail to do both auth and non-auth. However best practice is to use auth only to control any spam relaying. Check the sendmail.org website FAQ's for setting this up. You will want to probably use cyrus-sasl or cyrus-sasl2 ports along with sendmail. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 01:00:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689A8106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 435FF8FC21 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 95148 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 01:00:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=prodigy.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=U6Ppr/E9dI8rhns06PtU8H2n4j06gAUqr6KJjXIfUFqQWcF3ICrJQ/Bu1DPH0rKwii6/cODMr73RtNuGIUfwC6EXOtVinIe7rmP88naK6iNK3g4Y5pe+eSiFlcgyRtVKJSGcOW6uTTLwbJ+ScVnSGA4Q4XY1P97bM4Ulp+agH2M= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?75.7.236.228?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@75.7.236.228 with plain) by smtp118.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 01:00:57 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: dPSq6TkVM1kW1K4h9upzg9ssnp9f8F2BBux1A630pxKC1m.0p2PrRKUt8Rz84KZ8DI9wiMniaQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: jekillen Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:59:35 -0800 To: FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: jekillen Subject: named questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:00:58 -0000 Hello: I have named running as secondary server on v6.2 It will not start without a specific configuration file set on the command line. After doing some investigation it appears that that is because it runs chrooted and there is not a symlink from /etc/namedb. Is that a correct assumption? I read the man page and it specifies the default configuration file as /etc/namedb/named.conf and along with this file there are master and slave directories. Would I make the /etc/namedb/named.conf file to be a symlink to /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf? There are some other entries in rc.conf related to named that appear in my primary nameserver rc.conf file that relate to getting it up at boot but I have lost root access to that machine so I cannot recover the rc.conf details and I do not remember what document- ation I was using to set it up. I was advised to start named as a user other than root but when I tried that named would not start because the user I set it to does not have write permission in the directory that has the pid file. When named starts at boot what user does it run as, by default? Thank you for any guidance. Jeff K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 01:43:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0501065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:43:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D298FC1F for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2D1hCgV062209; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:43:18 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2D1hCgV062209 Message-ID: <47D886AF.1010207@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:43:11 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080312190519.0255f878@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080312190519.0255f878@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5971CE8C335DBECDE734F9D9" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:43:19 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6220/Wed Mar 12 22:33:03 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Doug Poland , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practice: sendmail and SMTP auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:43:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5971CE8C335DBECDE734F9D9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Derek Ragona wrote: > At 02:19 PM 3/12/2008, Doug Poland wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Not sure if this is the most appropriate place for this question, but >> since all my servers are FreeBSD 6.x/7.x, I'll give it a go... >> >> I am considering setting up SMTP auth on a number of sendmail >> instances that I control. After much googling and reading, it is not >> clear to me that a server with SMTP auth configured/enabled can relay >> mail in both auth and non-auth modes. >> >> If one sendmail configuration cannot accommodate both SMTP auth and >> access.db, does one setup a dedicated SMTP auth host with a SMART_HOST= >> option and feed incoming email to an non-auth instance of sendmail? >> >> Sorry if my terminology is ambiguous, I'm not a sendmail professional >> by day. > You can set up sendmail to do both auth and non-auth. However best=20 > practice is to use auth only to control any spam relaying. Check the=20 > sendmail.org website FAQ's for setting this up. You will want to=20 > probably use cyrus-sasl or cyrus-sasl2 ports along with sendmail. A good solution to this is to use port 587 for Authenticated new mail submission and leave port 25 for the normal MTA-MTA type of (not authenticated) traffic. Firstly, to enable authentication you need to compile sendmail against cyrus SASL2 (don't bother with SASL1 -- it's legacy only). Now, you can either do that by installing sendmail from ports, or you can install the cyrus-sasl port and then make the base system sendmail link against it by adding this to /etc/make.conf: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+=3D -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=3D2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+=3D -L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD+=3D -lsasl2 I also like to use these two so that any milters etc. I build from ports interoperate with the base system sendmail. SENDMAIL_MILTER_IN_BASE=3D yes WITH_SENDMAIL_BASE=3D yes In order to do SMTP AUTH most effectively, you should enable STARTSSL support -- I alway feel better knowing that passwords are sent over an encrypted connection. This is a guide to what you need in your $(hostname).mc to add STARTSSL with AUTH /required/ on mail submitted via port 587, but not provided on port 25: first: turn off the default MSA setup, which we'll provide our own settings for later: FEATURE(no_default_msa)dnl ## overridden with DAEMON_OPTIONS below [...] second: basic configuration for SMTP AUTH -- what mechanisms are supporte= d Note that LOGIN should only ever be allowed over encrypted connections as= it sends passwords in plain text. You can also authenticate by using SSL certificates but that is handled directly by sendmail and you don't need = to list EXTERNAL as a SASL mechanism. dnl ## Set SASL options TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl define(`confAUTH_REALM', `your.domain.name')dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl define(`confDONT_BLAME_SENDMAIL',`GroupReadableSASLDBFile')dnl [...] thirdly: insert the IP numbers of your servers into the following rules -= - if you don't use IPv6 you can omit the lines for the external address, bu= t you'll find things seem to work rather smoother if you keep the ::1 entri= es. The M=3DE flag says 'disable ETRN' and the M=3DEa flag says 'require auth= entication (and disable ETRN)' M=3DA means 'don't offer authentication here' Note th= at I'm only requiring authentication on the external interfaces so I implicitly trust= myself to submit e-mails via localhost:587 without it. You requirements may dif= fer. See http://www.sendmail.org/~gshapiro/8.10.Training/DaemonPortOptio= ns.html for an explanation of the capabilities of DAEMON_OPTIONS: dnl dnl Where the sendmail daemon should listen dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DIPv4, Addr=3D12.34.56.78, M=3DA, Family=3Dinet')dn= l DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DIPv4, Addr=3D127.0.0.1, M=3DA, Family=3Dinet')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DIPv6, Addr=3D::1, M=3DA, Family=3Dinet6')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DIPv6, Addr=3D2000:aa:bb:cc::1, M=3DA, Family=3Dine= t6')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DMSA, Addr=3D12.34.56.78, Port=3D587, M=3DEa')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DMSA, Addr=3D127.0.0.1, Port=3D587, M=3DE')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DMSA, Addr=3D2000:aa:bb:cc::1, Port=3D587, M=3DEa, = Family=3Dinet6')dnl DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=3DMSA, Addr=3D::1, Port=3D587, M=3DE, Family=3Dinet6= ')dnl fourthly: enable SSL capabilities in sendmail. See=20 http://aput.net/~jheiss/sendmail/tlsandrelay.shtml for a good article on configuring this stuff (although ignore the section on compiling sendmail: you get that automatically built into the base system sendmail already) dnl dnl TLS stuff dnl define(`CERT_DIR', `MAIL_SETTINGS_DIR`'certs')dnl define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/cacert.pem')dnl define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/cert.pem')dnl define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/key.pem')dnl define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/cert.pem')dnl define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/key.pem')dnl fifthly: there is no fifthly -- you're done. Build a sendmail.cf and tes= t that it all works. Cheers, Matthew=20 --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig5971CE8C335DBECDE734F9D9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkfYhrAACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxpEwCfR28IYZonEuuBTX4kojQt1Uwk WHwAoIcoIoR+rgMf3ZFFwBztCwSQ4HQO =9sCn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5971CE8C335DBECDE734F9D9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 02:04:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2136106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B6C8FC22 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2D1snXP006799; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:49 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (mx-in-02.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.185]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2D1smKB029155; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:48 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl85-95.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.52.95]) by MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2D1seik009922; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:42 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2D1sesX002439; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2D1seAv002438; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:40 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Doug Poland Message-ID: <20080313015440.GA2388@kobe.laptop> References: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practice: sendmail and SMTP auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:04:56 -0000 On 2008-03-12 14:19, Doug Poland wrote: > Hello, > Not sure if this is the most appropriate place for this > question, but since all my servers are FreeBSD 6.x/7.x, I'll > give it a go... > > I am considering setting up SMTP auth on a number of sendmail > instances that I control. After much googling and reading, it > is not clear to me that a server with SMTP auth > configured/enabled can relay mail in both auth and non-auth > modes. > > If one sendmail configuration cannot accommodate both SMTP auth > and access.db, does one setup a dedicated SMTP auth host with a > SMART_HOST option and feed incoming email to an non-auth > instance of sendmail? Sure it can. One of the ways to do something like this is: [1] Configure Sendmail to *require* authentication when one connects to its `submission' port (TCP port 587), and keep using /etc/mail/access for the default listener of the `smtp' port (TCP port 25). [2] Then you can configure your `trusted' clients to connect through port 587, and let everyone else keep using port 25. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 02:14:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DE6106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A498FC12 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:14:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working (c-71-60-127-199.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.60.127.199]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA63EEBC09 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:14:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:14:32 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions Message-Id: <20080312221432.ff2fd465.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080312154658.GA6696@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312154658.GA6696@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:14:34 -0000 Because I don't think it's appropriate to drag this conversation on and on, I'm going to try to answer all the responses in a single email. Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:36AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > [snip] > > > > No. The term "superuser" is a made-up term for any way of gaining > > root privs. In my experience it's confusing as there are two > > commonly used methods for doing this, the su command and sudo, and > > they require different passwords. > > I have never seen the term used that way. > > I have seen su and sudo referred to as ways of a non-root id gaining > superuser priviledge/root priviledge but not a superuser as someone who > is not root, but has a method of gaining root priviledge. Apparently I miscommunicated. My point was that the OP's message used the term "superuser" in an ambiguous way. (i.e. the way I mentioned). To me, it wasn't clear what it was asking for, and thus sending the OP to the PC-BSD community (where folks are probably familiar to the GUI widget he's dealing with) seemed the best thing to do. Erik Trulsson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:36AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: [snip] > > > > No. The term "superuser" is a made-up term for any way of gaining > > root privs. > > Wrong. "superuser" is, just as the previous poster said, a synonym > for "root", i.e. a user account with UID=0 > > See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superuser > or http://catb.org/jargon/html/S/superuser.html Who am I to argue with wikipedia? But the second link you provide does not agree with your explanation. According to The Jargon File, my wmoran account is a superuser, because it's a member of the wheel group. Thus, my argument that the term is ambiguous, which (based on the links you provided) you seem to be backing up. Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > Hate to be picky, because I'd agree with most everything else you wrote, > but superuser, and its synonym super-user, do appear in many base man > pages, for example the su page shown below. Sometimes it's a shortcut > for root (or other UID 0 user), like below in su, sometimes just for > effective UID 0 in general, for example as in mount(8). > > > The su utility requests appropriate user credentials via PAM and > > switches > > to that user ID (the default user is the superuser). A shell is then > > executed. Mel wrote: > > In the kernel even! > suser(9), suser_cred(9), vfs_suser(9) OK, I was wrong on this point. Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > I'd contend that the su manpage *should* say root not superuser, since > root is hardwired as the default. But for other cases, any user with > UID 0 might work just as well (e.g. toor). I agree on this point, but not enough to bother trying to put a patch together that (based on the conversation here) is likely to be controversial. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 02:32:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ECF1065682 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snow.mountains.4@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51A18FC22 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from snow.mountains.4@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so3181215wfa.7 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5aQB94uReqc8XJePF24SU32X28JoG/pIZpXKgu27sJI=; b=dXlQQXVMuk6HN+pFA3Cw8OJEiU1FDlfdEKgVAU5QJ1aL/vC5Q4Pl1Dqoh0Y12KHHcQRGmParTeSFPr4LDHU+dFASr/YOBpCcTeazP148lhVqJxY9EUqahG24oXI0o+DwhdJKUQo8DCY6+kteGPCxgDeVFjTVgcJWsjCLMTZ3nq4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=aVekTAZ85fYW21wT8MUqWYdx5no0hW2OgEWm00uKpG94dOkvNBMCz/IirjBoMi0fbAMXPjuytFSB2t9fvYF9k7ERTyyBoFi7OXd8L6lJP89OcCo8MjP4Skj/NV0tlCrlKSUmoRtM8vwD3rCAKqjFjbjH2lw6Euy9LkCQEqHKT04= Received: by 10.142.242.8 with SMTP id p8mr3964393wfh.212.1205375557190; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.165.3 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3cf9f8920803121932j32caaa79i407dbab8106b3dd8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:32:37 +0100 From: "Snow Mountains" To: "Josh Paetzel" In-Reply-To: <200803121429.14760.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3cf9f8920803101018i573a5c26l986b9508495fcd5a@mail.gmail.com> <444pbcdvwj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <3cf9f8920803120530k7f6420bfl5aa203864c058c90@mail.gmail.com> <200803121429.14760.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no ad1s3a,b,d... on ad1s3 after bsdlabel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:32:38 -0000 2008/3/12, Josh Paetzel : > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 07:30:34 am Snow Mountains wrote: > > 2008/3/12, Lowell Gilbert : > > > "Snow Mountains" writes: > > > > I try to understand bsdlabel. > > > > I have former fat slice (ad1s3) on my disk and I want to make several > > > > BSD partitions on it. I did this: > > > > > > > > # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad1s3 bs=1k count=1024 > > > > 1024+0 records in > > > > 1024+0 records out > > > > 1048576 bytes transferred in 0.318986 secs (3287217 bytes/sec) > > > > # bsdlabel -w ad1s3 > > > > # bsdlabel -e ad1s3 > > > > (edit) > > > > # bsdlabel ad1s3 > > > > # /dev/ad1s3: > > > > 8 partitions: > > > > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > > > > a: 10000000 16 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > > > b: 10000000 10000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > > > c: 47616660 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, > > > > don't edit d: 27616644 20000016 4.2BSD 0 0 0 > > > > # newfs -U /dev/ad1s3a > > > > newfs: /dev/ad1s3a: could not find special device > > > > # ls /dev/ad1s3* > > > > /dev/ad1s3 > > > > # > > > > > > > > What I miss because I don't have ad1s3a,b,d? > > > > If repeat same procedure on disk (big file) mounted as /dev/md0, a see > > > > /dev/md0,a,b,d,e... after this group of commands. > > > > > > On what version of FreeBSD? > > > > This happens on: > > > > # uname -r > > 6.2-RELEASE-p11 > > > > SergiM > > > Did you delete and recreate the slice or is it still marked as FAT when you do > fdisk /dev/ad1 Josh, you are right! No, I did not do it. It was still marked as FAT. I thought that it is enough to overwrite first 1M of slice with zeros. I entered sysinstall and just changed slice's type with T. That was enough. Then, fresh bsdlabel appeared on it. After editing, I now have all BSD partitions (a,b,d...) mountable. However, here handbook is not precise, I think. Please see this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/disks-adding.html I deduced from it that fdisk is necessary only for dedicated and new disks (fdisk -BI da1 #Initialize your new disk). > If it's still a FAT/DOS slice you might try deleting and recreating it as a > native FreeBSD slice, I'm not entirely sure putting a bsdlabel on a FAT slice > is going to do the right thing (although I could be wrong here) > It seems that you are right. But this still confuses me: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/minidisk.bin bs=1k count=100000 ......... # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /home/minidisk.bin -u 2 # ls /dev/md2* /dev/md2 # bsdlabel -w md2 # ls /dev/md2* /dev/md2 /dev/md2a /dev/md2c # bsdlabel -e md2 .......... # ls /dev/md2* /dev/md2 /dev/md2b /dev/md2d /dev/md2a /dev/md2c /dev/md2e and then # fdisk /dev/md2 ******* Working on device /dev/md2 ******* ................ The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 192717 (94 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 11/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: So bsdlabel was enough in this case. Why is this different from real hard disk? And one more question: is disk geometry data somehow written in fdisk W (write) actions? I mean, is it possible to spoil something on existing FreeBSD slices (which contain data) if I set wrong geometry for entire drive when I edit something in fdisk editor? Thank you very much SergiM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 02:52:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAC51065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dale.shaw@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B96E8FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:52:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dale.shaw@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m63so2732402hsc.11 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=9yJCxxU94VRZ8XcXCcj9bjfuen+6wHdr2BqtDNX+YY8=; b=RFyaP42mDTlZlrXMMzDVLUO0OVL5Y0IJAvMauqwpO4Ui/bcQ0EAgqJ4SowK4+r23i9ptngxJhdOXr8uLnsTra/wB7FltoqdsuejbBBdoRyjpg87maTJpkg18xSq1bxF74sGWpicyEQafkL6CGVRsY7ot7r8qJZaLhPj1L0K2xHk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sb5Ci+8Z9sb/gfZUNHVBm3pDrKLSeG6WJqdJw31ZOcF1KH2m7sn41ibnHcIuAftYcF48H946yGDx0zpt05wklv6zgYs8fbCLdIp6rGEz3aF3zRE2anaxaiINrXzjw/l1hRuoNxluM0K5SACL/b0T1LcAX9Q2baFmmGC4ECqiMoA= Received: by 10.100.242.20 with SMTP id p20mr18188989anh.4.1205376739376; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.205.7 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3329cbb40803121952r344b6e82i96fbbbf666c6ed10@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:52:19 +1100 From: "Dale Shaw" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3329cbb40802281347g6a486b8aif856960c08c47854@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3329cbb40802281347g6a486b8aif856960c08c47854@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.2-REL, system lockup, recovers when keyboard pressed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:52:20 -0000 Hi again all, Just an update on my problem (see below). I upgraded the box to 6.3-REL and the problem persisted -- exactly the same behaviour. I've narrowed the problem down to nfdump though -- without the NetFlow collectors (nfcapd) running, the box is rock solid. If anyone out there happens to have seen this problem (with nfdump and friends) before, or has some general advice for troubleshooting something like this (I suspect some system resource tuning may be required), please drop me a line. In the meantime, I'll head on over to the nfdump list. cheers, Dale > On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Dale Shaw wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > [...] > > > I have a vanilla 6.2-RELEASE system running a bunch of network > > > management type tools like RANCID, nfcapd, cacti and so on. > > > > > > After a few days of normal operation, the system (locked away in a > > > data centre) falls off the network. Can't SSH to it, can't ping it. No > > > ARP -- gone! I have no OOB access to this machine (it's a test > > > box/play pen). > > > > I have a vague memory of something like this but cannot point to a > > specific commit that resolved it. > > > > Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 03:00:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056151065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6D68FC1F for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so3663080wxd.7 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=egZqpY0LlsG9UVcYeevLM7V+XOfr6LfnkIs5SX/hrOE=; b=N+e5hxjj+2G3c7hUKx+yRiGR/17uCg2cBx02+su+nOy/Y93BNTYI2SEf5Wixaj8AqeK4UEDKquIuWb3s2pvk2hFOUua2yPJzmEPdl/GeHLW4pcGNKpWHW1LDR99x8hQUQ4ixYL+jzOxLVt1XOAtU2JvXW6o7bUC8CL6JH7c1K2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=M9RZXwfY8LwVw+9wbQd/Eq9a6hTNuaKMYq9K2hYCvhTmxzVYIwOZ1DFeReBTk9XVAqlRzj/JERfdY2QeI8R0BhD+H4PIFGdq/hRhLA/mqeWv0aoUyjg2gAKmUIy7uY+AtqPrX/jf9uR+8JZRS827hj7aj53+EWZDmat8UxBon5A= Received: by 10.100.247.14 with SMTP id u14mr18130562anh.59.1205377246565; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 2590.Belkin ( [66.75.122.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm19185610agb.13.2008.03.12.20.00.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:00:35 -1000 From: Robert Marella To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20080312170035.32b56e67@2590.Belkin> In-Reply-To: <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:00:48 -0000 On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:14:20 -0400 Chuck Robey wrote: > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on > FreeBSD, I can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get > it to work on FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to > one of my other systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, > but I've also tried HP officejets, and I just can't get locally > attached printers to work with cups. I can get them to work with > things like apsfilter very well, but either someone is going to have > to fix the Cups port (it builds, but nothing locally runs) or stop > recommending it. > > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to > hear about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no > success. > FWIW I had cups working (2 USB and 1 parellel) forever on three separate FreeBSD systems until last fall sometime. It had stopped working on each of them after an upgrade that I have long since forgot. After going through all of the removals and reinstalls, I compared what was installed on these systems with a Linux box that cups worked on. I found that I needed the /print/foomatic-db and /print/foomatic-de-engine ports. After I installed these two ports cups is working fine on my FreeBSD systems. HTH Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 03:10:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7A81065678 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [207.115.11.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1C58FC18 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with ESMTP id <20080313031006H0400a8pvie>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:10:08 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D89B07.60200@datapipe.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:09:59 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jekillen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: named questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:10:09 -0000 jekillen wrote: > Hello: > I have named running as secondary server on v6.2 > It will not start without a specific configuration file set > on the command line. After doing some investigation > it appears that that is because it runs chrooted and > there is not a symlink from /etc/namedb. Is that a correct > assumption? I read the man page and it specifies > the default configuration file as /etc/namedb/named.conf > and along with this file there are master and slave directories. > Would I make the /etc/namedb/named.conf file to be a symlink > to /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf? > What you've read is correct. chroot'ing does in fact prevent the program from traversing higher in the file hiarchy. This makes sense as to why you need to specify the configuration file on the command line. I presume named will read the configuration file prior to chrooting. I don't use named though as I have my preference, and can't be 100% without looking at the source code. A symlink does you no good do to my explanation above. If you chroot, you lose the ability to get into /var or vica versa. That's the whole purpose of 'change root'. > There are some other entries in rc.conf related to named that > appear in my primary nameserver rc.conf file that relate to getting > it up at boot but I have lost root access to that machine so I cannot > recover the rc.conf details and I do not remember what document- > ation I was using to set it up. > > I was advised to start named as a user other than root but when I > tried that named would not start because the user I set it to does > not have write permission in the directory that has the pid file. > named must be started as root in order to bind to port 53. Afterwards I assume it changes it's uid using some configuration setting. This is a standard practice now adays amongst utilities needing to bind to reserved ports. Check your config file to set the user you want to run the daemon as after it's done with it's initialization (i.e. binding to the port and creating the /var/run file), but remember you must physically start named as root in order to get named working correctly. > When named starts at boot what user does it run as, by default? > bind That's a guess based on the following: nat# fgrep bind /etc/passwd bind:*:53:53:Bind Sandbox:/:/usr/sbin/nologin > Thank you for any guidance. > Jeff K > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 03:15:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA181065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net (fmailhost03.isp.att.net [207.115.11.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4FE8FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with ESMTP id <20080313031523H0300i1orie>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:15:26 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D89C44.20706@datapipe.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:15:16 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Banning References: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email pop3 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:15:26 -0000 David Banning wrote: > I am using dovecot email on my server - Users can connect via IMAP or POP3. > > I have a user who is using pop3 but not removing the email from the > server - so the email stays on the server, -and- it is collecting on their > computer - as the emails build up, will there be a problem with this? > > For IMAP it stays on the server, so I assume the server will not be presented > with any problem - but will the user suffer any problem eventually? > The assumption that just because the user is using IMAP will alleviate any problems isn't necessarily true. I'd suggest getting over to the dovecot mailling lists and asking them specifically the same question. I don't use dovecot exclusively where I work, but generally when there is a problem, it's because of a user having way too much email. Whether the user keeps their mail on the server via pop or uses imap exclusively, the majority of the time it takes to grab headers and/or parse through all the emails is limited by disk. It's not uncommon for some of our users to have 4000+ emails in their inbox, and it's not uncommon for me to tell them why their pop/imap client is slow. ~Paul > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 03:48:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0AB1065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C72688FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZeQT-0003CT-6f; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:17 +0000 Received: from melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id m2D3mGC4022433; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:16 GMT Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8C19CFCA4B0; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:08 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: David Banning Message-ID: <20080313034808.GA12776@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080312204917.GA69118@skytracker.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:16 +0000 (GMT) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email pop3 question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:48:22 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:49:18PM -0400, David Banning wrote: > > I am using dovecot email on my server - Users can connect via IMAP or POP3. > > I have a user who is using pop3 but not removing the email from the > server - so the email stays on the server, -and- it is collecting on their > computer - as the emails build up, will there be a problem with this? Probably not. But it suggests to me that the user has probably misconfigured his pop client to not delete email after he's picked it up. Unless, he's using some peculiar kind of back-up strategy! > > For IMAP it stays on the server, so I assume the server will not be presented > with any problem - but will the user suffer any problem eventually? He could do. The pop3 protocol is painfully slow and deleting thousands of emails that have built up is no fun. You have to write a script that deletes them one by one unless dovecot supports a "delete all" mode for pop3. You might want to drop them an email to tell them that their email isn't being deleted after collection. Here's a script for deleting them, if he wants it: #!/usr/local/bin/ksh # # Deletes mail off pop3 server # # Usage: e.g: Clear 3000 emails: # #$ clean_pop3 3000 | telnet popserver.net 110 username="user"; password="pass"; MAX_MESS=$1 [ $# -eq 0 ] && exit 1 || : sleep 2 echo USER $username sleep 1 echo PASS $password sleep 2 while [[ $MAX_MESS -gt 0 ]] do echo DELE $MAX_MESS sleep 1 (( MAX_MESS -= 1 )) done sleep 2 echo QUIT sleep 2 -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 04:31:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C30106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from ex.volia.net (ex.volia.net [82.144.192.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50138FC1E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from em.volia.net ([82.144.192.9]) by ex.volia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JZZ0C-000Jvv-Tr for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:49 +0200 Received: from strawly.kettle.volia.net ([77.122.106.156] helo=[192.168.200.202]) by em.volia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JZZ0C-000EV2-K3 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:48 +0200 Message-ID: <47D8528F.3050000@ngc.net.ua> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:00:47 +0200 From: Zinevich Denis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Volia-Original-IP: 77.122.106.156 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practice: sendmail and SMTP auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:31:39 -0000 I dont remember if it can be done by sendmail, but with exim it can be done easy. Doug Poland пишет: > Hello, > > Not sure if this is the most appropriate place for this question, but > since all my servers are FreeBSD 6.x/7.x, I'll give it a go... > > I am considering setting up SMTP auth on a number of sendmail > instances that I control. After much googling and reading, it is not > clear to me that a server with SMTP auth configured/enabled can relay > mail in both auth and non-auth modes. > > If one sendmail configuration cannot accommodate both SMTP auth and > access.db, does one setup a dedicated SMTP auth host with a SMART_HOST > option and feed incoming email to an non-auth instance of sendmail? > > Sorry if my terminology is ambiguous, I'm not a sendmail professional > by day. > > > -- > Regards, > Doug > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 05:58:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7CF106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272898FC18 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4620B154D48 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:58:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <47D8C274.5030107@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:58:12 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: DRI on radeon 9500 using too wide memory bus? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:58:20 -0000 I've had DRI running on a radeon 9500 for a while now, and at some point in time tracking 6-STABLE and continuing now on 7-STABLE I've started seeing rendering artifacts in gl in the form of a cross-hatch pattern of pixels that don't get filled. At first I figured the card was failing, but I remembered a fact about the 9500 that made me doublethink that. The radeon 9500 is an r300 chipset, and differs from the 9700 only in the width of the memory bus (128 bit vs 256 bit) and possibly clock speed. If memory serves, the chip itself had the capacity to address 256 bits, but most 9500s just went out the door with 128 bit memory. I remember at one point in time trying out a hack to the 9500 driver that enabled the 256 bit bus to see if I had a rebadged 9700, and had similar artifacts. So I decided to peruse my X logs, and sure enough I see: (--) RADEON(0): Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (256 bit DDR SDRAM) Is it possible that the radeon driver is using the 256 bus? Is there a way to force it to use a 128 bit bus? Has anyone else seen this? Thanks, Reid From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 06:47:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C69106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from muarwi@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC138FC19 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from muarwi@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m63so2785726hsc.11 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:47:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=NdZtAyuYHZ/Mo9az1ArOeM25ugC9hwML4+Qo4YGHVYA=; b=eCr6plVJiqKdQPTEFrXFKVhbQwuc2FzbVJudb6NkQwo/3paSvsBfr0kSWkr+lxAtdxit2q024/TINfyZR0q2bbcYQbPMzB4Vo24yfV9S9QsUTgRJykzf3iAOuWeEBgBVWU16TgnFtczD6so7Ie6YVh7vS2n0RwsQvY2P+JTrYOg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=ArFGycFDx0GBl3bTkxkkf+fFaFd1yocBDoknZGHa+dS10GOCY0+w5KExRSpeo+2KLEY6deMZp/nLFxGIuGVKMldVk9hjTIxV4/MiHVVUEz63W+z4TF+BIqwz9VhvL3YG2ff5hJruC51yA0wdKYou2nEwPh+R5x+SmnXUONEEK7I= Received: by 10.150.198.14 with SMTP id v14mr5165261ybf.65.1205389288077; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.85.10 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <465d309c0803122321v7039bfb8l4754846425c9e1f7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:26 +0700 From: Fira To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:47:05 -0000 Hi list, I want to mount my /dev/ad1s1e, but it produce error output : root# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data1/ mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted I've checked my /var/log/messages, but it doesn't show any message related to that. I've fsck that slice, and retried to remount, but it failed again. Then, I add in my fstab this entry : ..snip.. /dev/ad1s1e /data1 ufs rw 2 2 and reboot my machine, but still the system didn't want to mount it. This is my bsdlabel output : root# /dev/ad1s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 488392002 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 163840000 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 122880000 163840000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 f: 163840000 286720000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 g: 37832002 450560000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 In my understanding, ad1s1e has been formatted into ufs, and I think there should be no problem to mount it. So, where is the point of my mistake? Thanks a lot for your responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 07:46:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6991A106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AC68FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185141EE87D; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:46:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.092 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.092 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.177, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7x6UTA+6Dyp; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:46:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc01.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6151EE854; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:46:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D8DBC0.3010106@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:46:08 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080312) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803121916.47569.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803121916.47569.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mel Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:46:17 -0000 Mel skrev: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 15:28:25 Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> The compile error I get is >> >> Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted >> >> Any suggestions? > > Details maybe? Just one line that's a pretty generic error message, that's > likely to be caused by system limits, isn't gonna get you much help. > The entire compilation line, the failure up until make returns control back to > the shell, that's what you'll need to provide at minimum. > Yes of course, here are some details: bsdpc01# uname -a FreeBSD bsdpc01.homenet.home 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008 root@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 portsnap fetch update All ports up to date, otherwise compiled and installed. cd /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3/ make ---------------------------------------- c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_LARGE_FILES=1 -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT kdcoplistview.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/kdcoplistview.Tpo -c -o kdcoplistview.o kdcoplistview.cpp mv -f .deps/kdcoplistview.Tpo .deps/kdcoplistview.Po /usr/local/bin/moc kdcopview.h -o kdcopview.moc rm -f kdcopview.cpp echo '#include ' > kdcopview.cpp echo '#include ' >> kdcopview.cpp /usr/local/bin/uic -L /usr/local/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -tr tr2i18n -i kdcopview.h ./kdcopview.ui > kdcopview.cpp.temp ; ret=$?; \ /usr/local/bin/perl -pe "s,tr2i18n( \"\" ),QString::null,g" kdcopview.cpp.temp | /usr/local/bin/perl -pe "s,tr2i18n( \"\"\, \"\" ),QString::null,g" | /usr/local/bin/perl -pe "s,image([0-9][0-9]*)_data,img\$1_kdcopview,g" | /usr/local/bin/perl -pe "s,: QWizard\(,: KWizard(,g" >> kdcopview.cpp ;\ rm -f kdcopview.cpp.temp ;\ if test "$ret" = 0; then echo '#include "kdcopview.moc"' >> kdcopview.cpp; else rm -f kdcopview.cpp ; exit $ret ; fi Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted ------------------------------------------ After this the cli just hangs! Processor goes idle. Disk and memory looks good. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 08:39:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D351065677 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ph.schottey@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F83E8FC28 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ph.schottey@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so3303762wfa.7 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:39:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=3JhkmHTBCT/v6VgNt0pYQR47zzgNKm1UyMc+B0Pgn6U=; b=VKP/ng+95thKlAjN+2YLdKNXxn4kYJUb2kWcUrUf1I3A2R/1B5t0DB7JuqX9XItFlcO1csvogpGxewv9FNh+g++1kz6wbHxPEjNmW7xU43crHpedFeTZVJ1YZraMs0dS90IlyEtrqtlK3peGD6Pw1yNuS6Q7IiVMjhGJ4wEZ8oc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mDSiayPtG+u6/lzxIl0fbNeAb7ap6P0NUyZRnE3WdC5QYRjZtQsY/czDi652l9Go0CBFIq/bQ1AeJxvTRyD36yajBxFXrgKiNvjWUBiaRuR2qBy2dRIaJB99/4kpREkynI304tpiw/Vc+NK6ZtU5WO+sPILwbmYvm+GgZ1dqoww= Received: by 10.142.251.9 with SMTP id y9mr4030463wfh.43.1205395811931; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.170.2 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <382a6af20803130110s7dc1bd34o83c53730dcb542a5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:10:11 +0100 From: "Philippe Schottey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: dell wireless X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:39:26 -0000 Hello, I just bought a dell inspiron 1525. Included is a Dell=99 Wireless 1395 802.11b/g Mini-Card - Europe Can this card be used on FreeBSD? Is there a specific procedure to follow? Thanks, Philippe Schottey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 09:29:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41365106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AD78FC1B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2D9SoZM008596; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:28:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2D9Sjsm008593; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:28:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:28:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Fira In-Reply-To: <465d309c0803122321v7039bfb8l4754846425c9e1f7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080313102833.U8592@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <465d309c0803122321v7039bfb8l4754846425c9e1f7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:29:13 -0000 > Hi list, > > I want to mount my /dev/ad1s1e, but it produce error output : > root# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data1/ > mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted > mount read only or fsck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 09:32:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFA9106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx08.cern.ch [137.138.166.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5898FC28 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX08 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg46.cern.ch ([137.138.137.154]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:32:51 +0100 Received: from cernfe13.cern.ch ([137.138.140.38]) by cernxchg46.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:32:51 +0100 Received: from lxplus217.cern.ch (137.138.4.38) by smtp.cern.ch (137.138.140.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.240.5; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:32:51 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:32:47 +0100 From: Luca Presotto X-X-Sender: presotto@lxplus217.cern.ch To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 09:32:51.0729 (UTC) FILETIME=[355A6010:01C884ED] Subject: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:32:54 -0000 Hi everyone! I was starting to think to recompile everything for my pc to speed up everything. I started googling and I found almost nothing about how to change make.conf on bsd. Almost everything was about Gentoo, somehow not unsurprisingly. The first thing I noticed is that for linux all the instructions are about doing CFLAGS=" value" while it seems from /etc/share/examples/make.conf that in bsd I don't need ". Is it correct? Second question: If I set MAKEOPTS= -j 3 will that be used when portupgrading? (It's really to slow otherwise!) Third question...The most difficult..Which are the best flags for my machine? (freebsd 7.0-RELEASE with an intel centrino core2 duo) I have seen in the ..../examples/etc/make.conf that one of the possible "CPUTYPE" is core2 which looks to me as the right one but a geekier friend of mine that lives inside gentoo-linux told me that this option is unknown is gcc 4.2 and will be working from gcc4.3, so he told me to use "prescott". And what do I have to set to make gcc aware of the type of CPU I have? CPUTYPE= cpu and then CFLAGS= --O2 -pipe (etc..) or should I not write the cputype and then do: CLFAGS= -march=mycpu --O2 etc.... Can someone give me some advice on how to configure this file? Or can you provide me some documentation? Thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 10:34:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645D4106577A for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juliushuang@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C068FC36 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juliushuang@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3882380waf.3 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:34:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gpgmail-state:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=65Ed4VLtr4KK97xhmBAfnMfXlIsr9uzLBAToaoEvlTo=; b=bcDFSR67clM243VYw8DNarh0mBAG2shXnBgTCy6TqV0n9WE1RQdvOjgU46MOIGnlZE7s02J4L1yyRk8r4oZA2V6kE6lcLFoh6QmH5eNDKf3hDvGlGcTv6gMf9xsaloseUW2VSipKrODmlgvPQFyvt++PnN8ek+0j2IyPL73Fb2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gpgmail-state:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=tD0g2AXZwJXXLOssElRGYCRzdXfGbYiy0onap8i9rsxwiDPJNrLrmS8lp7Pz9rZCjQRd8TXhRPyRUaM41yEzeeRsnsP+hTKgxvGnfu+P6EmM12AK3wfXqKL06iZJ7fY0SW7PiS5EI4XcZAT3uHgON87O3XJaQypdiBPkcOvrQ2c= Received: by 10.114.194.1 with SMTP id r1mr8924088waf.40.1205402967642; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?59.124.104.176? ( [59.124.104.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a8sm31027281poa.2.2008.03.13.03.09.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:09:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <47B49F79-13E4-435B-B9DF-F40E28DBBCB9@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julius Huang Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:09:24 +0800 To: Luca Presotto X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:34:01 -0000 On Mar 13, 2008, at 17:32 , Luca Presotto wrote: > Hi everyone! > I was starting to think to recompile everything for my pc to speed > up everything. I started googling and I found almost nothing about > how to > change make.conf on bsd. Almost everything was about Gentoo, > somehow not > unsurprisingly. Try man make.conf J.H. > The first thing I noticed is that for linux all the instructions > are about > doing CFLAGS=" value" while it seems from /etc/share/examples/ > make.conf > that in bsd I don't need ". Is it correct? > Second question: If I set MAKEOPTS= -j 3 will that be used when > portupgrading? (It's really to slow otherwise!) > Third question...The most difficult..Which are the best flags for my > machine? (freebsd 7.0-RELEASE with an intel centrino core2 duo) > I have seen in the ..../examples/etc/make.conf that one of the > possible > "CPUTYPE" is core2 which looks to me as the right one but a geekier > friend > of mine that lives inside gentoo-linux told me that this option is > unknown is gcc 4.2 and will be working from gcc4.3, so he told me > to use > "prescott". > And what do I have to set to make gcc aware of the type of CPU I have? > CPUTYPE= cpu > and then CFLAGS= --O2 -pipe (etc..) > or should I not write the cputype and then do: > CLFAGS= -march=mycpu --O2 etc.... > Can someone give me some advice on how to configure this file? > Or can you provide me some documentation? > Thank you! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 10:34:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DA31065737 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krijg945@planet.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml15.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml15.kpnxchange.com [213.75.38.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D078FC14 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krijg945@planet.nl) Received: from cpsmtp-eml105.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.84.105]) by hpsmtp-eml15.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:22:06 +0100 Received: from [10.0.0.151] ([213.10.147.18]) by cpsmtp-eml105.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:22:06 +0100 Message-ID: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:22:05 +0100 From: Marcin Koziuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071122 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luca Presotto References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 10:22:06.0291 (UTC) FILETIME=[1668C230:01C884F4] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: marcin.koziuk@planet.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:34:10 -0000 Luca Presotto wrote: > Hi everyone! > I was starting to think to recompile everything for my pc to speed > up everything. I started googling and I found almost nothing about how to > change make.conf on bsd. Almost everything was about Gentoo, somehow not > unsurprisingly. > The first thing I noticed is that for linux all the instructions are about > doing CFLAGS=" value" while it seems from /etc/share/examples/make.conf > that in bsd I don't need ". Is it correct? > Second question: If I set MAKEOPTS= -j 3 will that be used when > portupgrading? (It's really to slow otherwise!) > Third question...The most difficult..Which are the best flags for my > machine? (freebsd 7.0-RELEASE with an intel centrino core2 duo) > I have seen in the ..../examples/etc/make.conf that one of the possible > "CPUTYPE" is core2 which looks to me as the right one but a geekier friend > of mine that lives inside gentoo-linux told me that this option is > unknown is gcc 4.2 and will be working from gcc4.3, so he told me to use > "prescott". > And what do I have to set to make gcc aware of the type of CPU I have? > CPUTYPE= cpu > and then CFLAGS= --O2 -pipe (etc..) > or should I not write the cputype and then do: > CLFAGS= -march=mycpu --O2 etc.... > Can someone give me some advice on how to configure this file? > Or can you provide me some documentation? > Thank you! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You're *really* wasting your time. The whole thing about those compiler optimizations is a myth. And most ports are already compiled with -O2 by default IIRC. But why would you spend two days compiling for a 0.1% speed increase? Your system is doing no cpu cycles at all for most of the time anyway. And I really wouldn't recommend aggressive optimizations for stuff like the kernel. Disabling unnecessary services or installing apps you often use without support for X and Y (like installing KDE or Gnome base, then the apps you *really* want on top of it) will give you much better performance than messing with CFLAGS and such. Also, makeopts and -pipe just make _compiling_ faster, not the applications themselves!!!. Please take a look at the following pages, they have a lot more information about this matter ;) http://funroll-loops.info/ http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74072 -- - Marcin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 10:59:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C386106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx05.cern.ch [137.138.166.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289E28FC1A for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XSmclbU24fDH3WisvWS1m6asLw4dVuj3OI+pxl79PQx2gozcaUFhKZNXuFRoUHTiE0E/7Ei7U0jPJcyU4Kn/qCQ5TaejKqht7Joi9gtPN5YHMRT4U+GZnHB+GmIeCO+g; Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX05 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg50.cern.ch ([137.138.137.175]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:58:53 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:58:52 +0100 Message-ID: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Tuning make.conf Thread-Index: AciE9B1a4sXkqyGUSe2IIdL4Md9rZAAAsQVg References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> From: "Luca Presotto" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 10:58:53.0764 (UTC) FILETIME=[3A2A6840:01C884F9] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:59:01 -0000 >You're *really* wasting your time.=20 I supposed that! >Your system is doing no cpu cycles at all for most of=20 >the time anyway. [cut]Also, makeopts and -pipe just make _compiling_ = faster, not the=20 >applications themselves!!!. I agree with everything. In any case I think that a faster compiling = will really be a good thing. I have been reading another time the man of make.conf and I still have = some doubts. Neither in the example either in the man page there is any reference to = "MAKEOPTS". Changing from -j1 to -j3 would really be a huge difference!=20 To be able to set this is very important.=20 Then I don't want an ultra tweaked make.conf like gentooers do. Just a = reasonable one.=20 (And you have convinced me, I won't recompile everything. Just to have a = good compiling when I will be upgrading) I have some doubts about the correct syntax, the man is ambiguous in = this point. If I write CPUTYPE=3D core2 will it automatically sets all the best safe = CFLAGS for my core or just set the -march=3Dcore2 Should my make.conf be like: MAKEOPTS=3D=3D-j3 CPUTYPE=3Dcore2 CFLAGS=3D --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing or just: MAKEOPTS=3D=3D-j3 CPUTYPE=3Dcore2 or maybe: MAKEOPTS=3D=3D-j3 CPUTYPE=3Dcore2 CFLAGS+=3D --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing >Please take a look at the following pages, they have a lot more=20 >information about this matter ;) >http://funroll-loops.info/ >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D74072 Actually that's really funny!! I think that's why there are so many = pages about gentoo and almost none about other OSes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 11:01:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF52106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.ipv6.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2a01:138:100:1:219:d1ff:fe6a:ef49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012B98FC24 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (ppp-82-135-9-51.dynamic.mnet-online.de [82.135.9.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by anny.lostinspace.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2DB0x31000993 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:01:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5F9130CDD for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:00:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6220/Wed Mar 12 23:33:03 2008 on anny.lostinspace.de X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at idefix.lan Received: from server.idefix.lan ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.idefix.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CjUhtSn3IKaY for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:00:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from matthias-fechners-macbook.local (unknown [192.168.1.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0614130CE2 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:00:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D90964.4010605@fechner.net> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:00:52 +0100 From: Matthias Fechner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D825B6.1050207@fechner.net> <200803122021.25842.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803122021.25842.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (anny.lostinspace.de [80.190.182.2]); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:01:00 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,UPPERCASE_50_75 autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on anny.lostinspace.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: Source Upgrade to FreeBSD 7 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:01:04 -0000 Hi Mel, Mel schrieb: > How ever did you get something in /usr/src looking for /usr/local/lib/*? hm not really. I deleted now /usr/src and /usr/obj, did a fresh cvsup and got the same error message. > What's in /etc/make.conf please? hm, that is a bit longer but here: CPUTYPE?=i686 CFLAGS= -O1 -pipe FETCH_ENV= "FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=\"yes\"" USA_RESIDENT=NO HAVE_MOTIF=yes CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes WITH_CUPS=yes NO_LPR=yes WITH_MUTT_COMPRESSED_FOLDERS=yes WITH_MUTT_NCURSES=yes WITH_MUTT_IMAP=yes WITH_MUTT_POP=yes WITH_MUTT_SSL=yes WITH_MUTT_QUOTE_PATCH=yes WITH_MUTT_PGP_PATCH=yes WITH_MUTT_MBOX_HOOK_PATCH=yes WITH_MUTT_IMAP_HEADER_CACHE=yes WITH_MUTT_SIDEBAR_PATCH=yes WITH_MUTT_EDIT_THREADS=yes WITH_MUTT_REVERSE_REPLY_PATCH=yes ASPELL_DE=yes ASPELL_EN=yes WITH_APACHE2=yes WITH_BERKELEYDB=db42 WITH_PROXY_MODULES=yes WITH_SSL_MODULES=yes NET_SNMP_SYS_CONTACT="idefix@fechner.net" NET_SNMP_SYS_LOCATION="Keller" DEFAULT_SNMP_VERSION=3 NET_SNMP_LOGFILE=/var/log/snmpd.log NET_SNMP_PERSISTENTDIR=/var/net-snmp WITH_PERL=yes WITH_SLAPI=yes WITH_BDB_VER=42 A4=yes ISPELL_DENEU=yes WITH_OPENLDAP=yes WITH_CONTENT_SCAN=yes WEBALIZER_LANG=german INSTALL_AS_NCFTP=yes ENABLE_SUIDPERL=yes WITH_MOD_DAV_SVN=yes WITH_CRAM=yes PAGESIZE="a4" WITH_SUID_GPG=yes WEBSVNDIR=../home/http/svn/htdocs WITH_SCPONLY_SVN=yes WITH_SCPONLY_SVNSERVE=yes RUBY_VER=1.8 DRIVER_MANAGER=unixodbc DEFAULT_CVS_SERVER=":pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs2.de.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs" WITHOUT_WEB="YES" WITH_LINUX_BOOTSTRAP="YES" FETCH_CMD=/usr/bin/fetch -ARr WITH_PHP5="YES" PAPERSIZE=a4 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 Bye, Matthias -- "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 12:02:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487EE1065676 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juliushuang@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75DD8FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juliushuang@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c49so2754427wra.19 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:02:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gpgmail-state:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; bh=nB7mRxmxp9X3/Oi5e9v8cAZ1b21z+vlgPKmdPIviHn0=; b=nTc7MPSY/YKVu0Kpn9/avHTEzhB889M6URyVk7S13Tznpo3xn98cGm6NTAuEHBlEHX38PKryHo1tLQOW11OJhD8yig9akxmYw3n8+JFcA1l9QeY+Kh9RM2DuzV9ioBWY50XfWgkKZdpqLeHZ9Jomjics/Ps/7C9TI1dp2WzvmQw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gpgmail-state:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=rWHUVKbhHKj6U/7THkRwHd587AUedQDOx78x+qwL94UiNJnT/rwYNSBf2VZt8gMSnCddn+6gqVZnWC3/2LFDaTsK+vBCZQhj2uIa9mjm6XfJKdFl+HhWme3JgPXjB2G/Ek7C7LaF0Yxi6JjEpsNSri1FpYRgl99ac8njwustgKk= Received: by 10.114.154.1 with SMTP id b1mr9158949wae.34.1205409752402; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?59.124.104.176? ( [59.124.104.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m26sm31180050pof.8.2008.03.13.05.02.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:02:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) X-Gpgmail-State: !signed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <87F851FC-750A-478F-BD01-1B7FED69BF7A@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julius Huang Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:02:24 +0800 To: Luca Presotto X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Cc: marcin.koziuk@planet.nl, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:02:34 -0000 Hi, On Mar 13, 2008, at 18:58 , Luca Presotto wrote: >> You're *really* wasting your time. > I supposed that! > > >> Your system is doing no cpu cycles at all for most of >> the time anyway. [cut]Also, makeopts and -pipe just make >> _compiling_ faster, not the >> applications themselves!!!. > > I agree with everything. In any case I think that a faster > compiling will really be a good thing. > I have been reading another time the man of make.conf and I still > have some doubts. > Neither in the example either in the man page there is any > reference to "MAKEOPTS". Changing from -j1 to -j3 would really be a > huge difference! > Isn't -j depend on how many cpu/core and a faster harddisk / raid? In our small lab we used to install New system on some Very Old SCSI for testing (18G SCSI 2 I think). It takes 2x to 3x more time to build world / kernel than a New SCSI Ultra 320 HD on the Same machine no matter what we put in -j. Faster / Higher IO through put always compile faster. Also there may be problem buildworld and buildkernel if use -j IIRC, other method is required to speed up compiler when build world / kernel. Like not compile everything except what is Really need to be recompile. > To be able to set this is very important. > Then I don't want an ultra tweaked make.conf like gentooers do. > Just a reasonable one. > (And you have convinced me, I won't recompile everything. Just to > have a good compiling when I will be upgrading) > > I have some doubts about the correct syntax, the man is ambiguous > in this point. > If I write CPUTYPE= core2 will it automatically sets all the best > safe CFLAGS for my core or just set the -march=core2 > Should my make.conf be like: > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > CPUTYPE=core2 > CFLAGS= --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing > > or just: > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > CPUTYPE=core2 > > or maybe: > > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > CPUTYPE=core2 > CFLAGS+= --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing > I remember seeing some thread in Stable@, Question@, Performance@ discuss about best CPUTYPE on AMD64 not long ago. J.H. >> Please take a look at the following pages, they have a lot more >> information about this matter ;) >> http://funroll-loops.info/ >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74072 > > Actually that's really funny!! I think that's why there are so many > pages about gentoo and almost none about other OSes. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 12:05:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168DE106568C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from www.liukuma.net (www.liukuma.net [62.220.235.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC5D8FC31 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2591CC6A; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:01:55 +0200 (EET) Received: from www.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id kad8YzxPJJf3; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:01:54 +0200 (EET) Received: from L02D81003 (unknown [195.148.43.236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ignatz@www.liukuma.net) by www.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA331CC68; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:01:53 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <7AB40EFE5B504CD0B1EBF6E0223EB69B@L02D81003> From: "Reko Turja" To: "Luca Presotto" References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:05:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:05:31 -0000 > Should my make.conf be like: > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > CPUTYPE=core2 > CFLAGS= --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing > > or just: > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > CPUTYPE=core2 > > or maybe: > > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > CPUTYPE=core2 > CFLAGS+= --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing Setting CFLAGS can cause errors while compiling and other undesirable effects, so I recommend leaving CFLAGS undefined. If you want to optimise things use COPTFLAGS instead. -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 12:10:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70617106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22BB78FC13 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from corinth.polands.org ([75.87.219.217]) by hrndva-omta05.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20080313121039.QFLZ7571.hrndva-omta05.mail.rr.com@corinth.polands.org>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:39 +0000 Received: from ammon.polands.org (ammon.polands.org [172.16.1.7]) by corinth.polands.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2DCAZHq066413; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:10:35 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@polands.org) Received: from ammon.polands.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ammon.polands.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2DCAYGU035615; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:10:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp@ammon.polands.org) Received: (from djp@localhost) by ammon.polands.org (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m2DCAVfj035614; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:10:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from djp) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:10:31 -0500 From: Doug Poland To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20080313121031.GA35591@polands.org> References: <9587.208.49.58.254.1205349581.squirrel@email.polands.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080312190519.0255f878@mail.computinginnovations.com> <47D886AF.1010207@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D886AF.1010207@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/6223/Thu Mar 13 06:37:57 2008 on corinth.polands.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Doug Poland , questions@freebsd.org, Derek Ragona Subject: Re: Best practice: sendmail and SMTP auth X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:41 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:43:11AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Derek Ragona wrote: > >At 02:19 PM 3/12/2008, Doug Poland wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>Not sure if this is the most appropriate place for this question, > >>but since all my servers are FreeBSD 6.x/7.x, I'll give it a go... > >> > >>I am considering setting up SMTP auth on a number of sendmail > >>instances that I control. After much googling and reading, it is > >>not clear to me that a server with SMTP auth configured/enabled can > >>relay mail in both auth and non-auth modes. > >> > >>If one sendmail configuration cannot accommodate both SMTP auth and > >>access.db, does one setup a dedicated SMTP auth host with a > >>SMART_HOST option and feed incoming email to an non-auth instance of > >>sendmail? > >> > >>Sorry if my terminology is ambiguous, I'm not a sendmail > >>professional by day. > > >You can set up sendmail to do both auth and non-auth. However best > >practice is to use auth only to control any spam relaying. Check the > >sendmail.org website FAQ's for setting this up. You will want to > >probably use cyrus-sasl or cyrus-sasl2 ports along with sendmail. > > A good solution to this is to use port 587 for Authenticated new mail > submission and leave port 25 for the normal MTA-MTA type of (not > authenticated) traffic. Firstly, to enable authentication you need to > compile sendmail against cyrus SASL2 (don't bother with SASL1 -- it's > legacy only). Now, you can either do that by installing sendmail from > ports, or you can install the cyrus-sasl port and then make the base > system sendmail link against it by adding this to /etc/make.conf: > > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS+= -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 > SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS+= -L/usr/local/lib > SENDMAIL_LDADD+= -lsasl2 > > I also like to use these two so that any milters etc. I build from > ports interoperate with the base system sendmail. > > SENDMAIL_MILTER_IN_BASE= yes > WITH_SENDMAIL_BASE= yes > > In order to do SMTP AUTH most effectively, you should enable STARTSSL > support -- I alway feel better knowing that passwords are sent over an > encrypted connection. This is a guide to what you need in your > $(hostname).mc to add STARTSSL with AUTH /required/ on mail submitted > via port 587, but not provided on port 25: > > first: turn off the default MSA setup, which we'll provide our own > settings for later: > > FEATURE(no_default_msa)dnl ## overridden with DAEMON_OPTIONS below > > [...] > > second: basic configuration for SMTP AUTH -- what mechanisms are > supported Note that LOGIN should only ever be allowed over encrypted > connections as it sends passwords in plain text. You can also > authenticate by using SSL certificates but that is handled directly by > sendmail and you don't need to list EXTERNAL as a SASL mechanism. > > dnl ## Set SASL options > TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl > define(`confAUTH_REALM', `your.domain.name')dnl > define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl > define(`confDONT_BLAME_SENDMAIL',`GroupReadableSASLDBFile')dnl > > [...] > > thirdly: insert the IP numbers of your servers into the following > rules -- if you don't use IPv6 you can omit the lines for the external > address, but you'll find things seem to work rather smoother if you > keep the ::1 entries. > > The M=E flag says 'disable ETRN' and the M=Ea flag says 'require > authentication (and disable ETRN)' M=A means 'don't offer > authentication here' Note that I'm only requiring authentication on > the external interfaces so I implicitly trust myself > to submit e-mails via localhost:587 without it. You requirements may > differ. See > http://www.sendmail.org/~gshapiro/8.10.Training/DaemonPortOptions.html > for an explanation of the capabilities of DAEMON_OPTIONS: > > dnl > dnl Where the sendmail daemon should listen > dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Addr=12.34.56.78, M=A, Family=inet')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Addr=127.0.0.1, M=A, Family=inet')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Addr=::1, M=A, Family=inet6')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Addr=2000:aa:bb:cc::1, M=A, Family=inet6')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA, Addr=12.34.56.78, Port=587, M=Ea')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA, Addr=127.0.0.1, Port=587, M=E')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA, Addr=2000:aa:bb:cc::1, Port=587, M=Ea, > Family=inet6')dnl > DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=MSA, Addr=::1, Port=587, M=E, Family=inet6')dnl > > fourthly: enable SSL capabilities in sendmail. See > http://aput.net/~jheiss/sendmail/tlsandrelay.shtml for a good article > on configuring this stuff (although ignore the section on compiling > sendmail: you get that automatically built into the base system > sendmail already) > > dnl > dnl TLS stuff > dnl > define(`CERT_DIR', `MAIL_SETTINGS_DIR`'certs')dnl > define(`confCACERT_PATH', `CERT_DIR')dnl > define(`confCACERT', `CERT_DIR/cacert.pem')dnl > define(`confSERVER_CERT', `CERT_DIR/cert.pem')dnl > define(`confSERVER_KEY', `CERT_DIR/key.pem')dnl > define(`confCLIENT_CERT', `CERT_DIR/cert.pem')dnl > define(`confCLIENT_KEY', `CERT_DIR/key.pem')dnl > > fifthly: there is no fifthly -- you're done. Build a sendmail.cf and > test that it all works. > > Cheers, > Matthew > Thank you very much for that comprehensive explanation. -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 12:30:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EEF1065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx07.cern.ch [137.138.166.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1C08FC1E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Vj61YmFruO0ULG8iiR6CAP8wrde3owdN8YqDQiRgOj4kWaFor7wjC31yVWxygyeQnFrbDHTR6F8vCgCtVKTLWvIQ7qIKbzteZI+QSS9OJT1ACee4BubjJ2oclQa68wra; Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX07 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg50.cern.ch ([137.138.137.175]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:06 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:05 +0100 Message-ID: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9B@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Tuning make.conf Thread-Index: AciFAiLFlFlgCy9SQYKEsGBT+aukYgAAlEkq References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <87F851FC-750A-478F-BD01-1B7FED69BF7A@gmail.com> From: "Luca Presotto" To: "Julius Huang" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 12:30:06.0247 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8050B70:01C88505] Cc: marcin.koziuk@planet.nl, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:30:08 -0000 >Isn't -j depend on how many cpu/core and a faster harddisk / raid? Yes, it is. But with j1 you have only one job running at a time. On a = dual core you can really easily running at least two jobs at the same = time. Then I've read a number of ideas about which is the relation between the = number of cores and the optimal number of jobs. I have been suggested something between n+1 and 2n+1 Of course the optimal number of jobs depends on the disk speed and = similar. But switching between 1 and 3 gives something like halving the time = needed to compile everything. Maybe it's possible that when building the kernel it gives some problem, = but I'm thinking about compiling ports. Or does portupgrade automatically chooses which -j to use? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 12:50:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A26106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx06.cern.ch [137.138.166.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706EB8FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YvL7Dtzqx4j3BN4FQ+A5QMgvjeDCxMyZZJGzPiW1OR2ibpgP3sTrUii57b2mro5gW7sttoXcz0cFBlwKWviSkr/Y1pgJzee3ntj4/aKKaEMhzCKOQP/OofPlTZX87SLM; Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX06 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg50.cern.ch ([137.138.137.175]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:50:11 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:50:11 +0100 Message-ID: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: wpi driver patches Thread-Index: AciFCMZUQuIWrhS4SgG3i4kq9rW7Fw== From: "Luca Presotto" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 12:50:11.0465 (UTC) FILETIME=[C662B790:01C88508] Subject: wpi driver patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:50:15 -0000 Hi, It's still me.=20 I have read past posts about the patches available for the wpi = intel3945abg driver found at: http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/wpi_releng7.diff=20 I see that it's a diff between the newest version and a version dated:2 = february 2008. The wpi drivers I have are from: www.clearchain.com/wiki/FreeBSD_Intel_3945abg_WPI_Wireless_Driver and are last updated in november. If I try to apply the patches with #patch < wpi_releng7.diff I get lots of errors. Hunk #1 failed at 75. Hunk #2 failed at 158. Hunk #3 failed at 188. Hunk #4 failed at 198. Hunk #5 succeeded at 212 (offset 1 line). Hunk #6 succeeded at 220 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line). Hunk #7 succeeded at 300 with fuzz 2 (offset -1 lines). Hunk #8 failed at 461. Hunk #9 failed at 507. and so on for lots of line... When coming to the last file(if_wpivar.h) It tells me: Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y]=20 Any answer I give will give some error. Of course after that if I try to compile it gives lots of error. All that to say that it looks to me like the wrong patch for the drivers = I have. Where can I find more updated drivers to which I can apply these = patches? Thank you! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 13:15:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D2E1065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:15:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47588FC31 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.72.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512BE405BFE; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D928F3.1090408@bsdforen.de> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:31 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luca Presotto References: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> In-Reply-To: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wpi driver patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:15:35 -0000 Luca Presotto wrote: > ... > > Where can I find more updated drivers to which I can apply these patches? > > Thank you! The patches are for the RELENG_7 sources. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 13:21:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237581065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23E68FC13 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458B3163F83 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:01:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C59D0BA7 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:01:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:01:47 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080313130147.70fae093@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <7AB40EFE5B504CD0B1EBF6E0223EB69B@L02D81003> References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <7AB40EFE5B504CD0B1EBF6E0223EB69B@L02D81003> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:21:57 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:05:27 +0200 "Reko Turja" wrote: > > > MAKEOPTS==-j3 > > CPUTYPE=core2 > > CFLAGS+= --O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing > > Setting CFLAGS can cause errors while compiling and other undesirable > effects, so I recommend leaving CFLAGS undefined. > If you want to optimise things use COPTFLAGS instead. Don't set either of them, they both get set automatically, and messing with COPTFLAGS is potentially more dangerous than with messing CFLAGS. Just set CPUTYPE unless you know what you are doing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 13:30:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8874106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx07.cern.ch [137.138.166.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420FF8FC1B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FfDgMI/l0hgDsM9dnolMcwmvRyOxAdLj2Z6BEEL+CMazlVSKtvDOWYJC6DzA+iBCwvPLZ58EJOxvs/GKbmlfT23Z0piJfVHO4IEVNGGkZhMPQM4tA36VsyksS/2PorOl; Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -50 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX07 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg50.cern.ch ([137.138.137.175]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:48 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:29:52 +0100 Message-ID: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9D@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: wpi driver patches Thread-Index: AciFDFWjLo5XXz05RL2rFi+0W9j0pAAAfwcV References: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9C@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <47D928F3.1090408@bsdforen.de> From: "Luca Presotto" To: "Dominic Fandrey" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 13:30:48.0483 (UTC) FILETIME=[72F62730:01C8850E] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: wpi driver patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:50 -0000 >The patches are for the RELENG_7 sources. I could figure that from the name. Where can I find a list of which version are available and where? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 13:31:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEB21065675 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB11B8FC1B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28818D05B3 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:31:15 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080313133115.4b0ebe16@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9B@cernxchg50.cern.ch> References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <87F851FC-750A-478F-BD01-1B7FED69BF7A@gmail.com> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9B@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:31:22 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:30:05 +0100 "Luca Presotto" wrote: > Maybe it's possible that when building the kernel it gives some > problem, but I'm thinking about compiling ports. You need to understand that make.conf affects FreeBSD make, which is used for building the base system, and for the ports infrastructure. It's use in ports in analogous to the python part of the Gentoo portage system. The actual port build itself is normally done by gmake (GNU make), because that's determined by the upstream project. Passing -j directly to a port make doesn't make any sense, and breaks the ports system. What you need to do is pass the -j to the underlying gmake in the build stage. I can't remember offhand how to do that, but you can look in bsd.port.mk to see what variables get used. There is also talk of regularizing this this approach by changes to the ports system. Whether or not an individual port works with -j is mostly a matter for the upstream project; many builds will break or become flakey, so any -j settings need to be made per port rather than globally. (BTW if you want to speed-up builds you might also try devel/ccache.) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:12:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6100F106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com (gv-out-0910.google.com [216.239.58.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7C08FC2D for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:12:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: by gv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n40so915258gve.39 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:12:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=d3tIuTinsJMJBQuruSJs0LkLRfErARq4gSRzfsDk9Fg=; b=R/X1W/UdqB7pi8xTm3GpyqQkP0G0YWhKSp/1gAGmI+3QJSsnpHV4nWGjoL4TLC/rhz9kc3gyzSG2T3YtZLmbXWgS9HUfvaVITiLQ8BkxmyNJmySIiXUVJKu3T4nA9YPwdAWFq5iejvCh0z5YjBlomlzJdh6gP+crEHHupQa0nWI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QpnRUrVozZMGTXcqcrrJzDotAIDJchojsunQF7Ghq/enlgrqbfwtSK4HsbGMGUTBwiSNMs8+GlGi19zNe81qPp4a/syE+Wu7pGRUpj/XmCXIsf7kfbUR2tQcr83kGQ8G/XHoRsYV2Gw0TUcFWl3/HtvBJb1+77wNfTpmJf1PJqw= Received: by 10.150.148.7 with SMTP id v7mr5465466ybd.26.1205417540261; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.16 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:12:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c0b01820803130712j735f3efdi84b0e92f9c592c66@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:12:20 -0400 From: "Alexander Sack" To: "John Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <3c0b01820803121501o45065f61gfba0d0fa8f1e71f1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3c0b01820803121329h2c223a6ek66e8f2d4bb7510fe@mail.gmail.com> <3c0b01820803121337s17f256f7j47402c84610c9b07@mail.gmail.com> <200803121654.42936.lists@jnielsen.net> <3c0b01820803121501o45065f61gfba0d0fa8f1e71f1@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Switching terminals under VMWare Fusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:12:24 -0000 Well, I'm stumped. ALT key just does not work as designed on my Fusion/FreeBSDS-7.0-RELEASE install. Its probably pilot error but I just don't see it. I even tried inverting the Alt/Option key to see if that would work. I thought the issue was I rebuilt a VMWARE kernel stubbing out a lot of unnecessary modules from a normal GENERIC build. I know its far fetched but I thought when this did work once, I was running GENERIC. Man this sucks! :(! -aps On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 6:01 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > JN: > Thanks for the reply! Unfortunately, hotkeys on Mac use the Apple button, > not ALT so I don't think this applies but I will try to investigate if there > is some conflict with ALT and Fusion itself. I can't find anything in > Preferences that would lead me to believe that there is a conflict (I do > know that normally you have to hit fn+alt/option unless you use an advanced > tunable via your .vmx file). > > Btw, I had this working at some point....hmmmm....I just thought of > something...gonna try something else. > > Thanks! > > -aps > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:54 PM, John Nielsen wrote: > > > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 04:37:44 pm Alexander Sack wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Alexander Sack > > wrote: > > > > Hello Everydoy: > > > > I apologize if this isn't exactly the right place but I'm out of > > > > options! I've posted on the Fusion community website up on > > vmware.com > > > > but am still lost. I'm running 7.0-RELEASE under VMWare Fusion on a > > > > MBP/Leopard ( 10.5.1). I've installed the vmware-tools port as well > > > > as the tools shipped with Fusion and made some edits to accommodate > > > > 7.0-RELEASE. All is well minus the fact that either the ALT key or > > > > some other issue is preventing me from switching terminals (ALT-F1, > > > > F2, etc.). Has anyone seen this problem before? If you run > > > > Workstation or Fusion have you seen any issues with switching > > > > terminals? > > > > > > > > Any pointers would be much appreciated! > > > > > > > Btw, the reason why I say its the handling of the ALT key is that I > > > can't get into kdb (ALT-CTLR-ESC, etc.). This is really frustrating! > > > -aps > > > > I just happened to read this from a Workstation VM so I played around > > with > > it a bit. The reason ctrl-alt keystrokes don't work is that they never > > get to the VM. VMware uses them for its own hotkey combos: ctrl-alt = > > release mouse/keyboard, ctrl-alt-enter = toggle full-screen, > > ctrl-alt-right = next running VM, etc. I went into the options for > > VMware > > (on the host, Windows in my case) and changed the hotkey to > > ctrl-alt-shift. It didn't take effect immediately, but once I paused my > > VM, closed VMware and started it back up again I was able to use > > ctrl-alt > > combos in my VM. That includes switching to a virtual terminal from X, > > switching workspaces in xfce (ctrl-alt-left and right), etc. > > > > JN > > > > > > > -- > "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to > what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson > -- "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:16:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C34F106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz12.oekb.co.at (srvdmz12.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEEE8FC1E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:16:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz12.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:53 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:49 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2DDFnwB008014 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:49 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2DDFnxU008013 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:49 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:49 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080313131549.GA7984@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 13:15:49.0846 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B550760:01C8850C] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2008_03_13_14_15_54 Subject: 16GB RAM -> Swap? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:16:03 -0000 Hi, I've got a Blade-system with 16GB RAM, but "only" one 140GB harddisk. My question is about swap-space: Traditional knowledge recommends swap = 2*RAM. This would mean 32GB swap (!). Should I really go for 32GB swap space? Or will e.g. 16GB (= RAM-size) be enough? Please note, that I don't do kernel debugging etc. on this machine - just a production machine used for network monitoring (Mrtg, nfsen, cacti) TIA for any clue, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:20:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567F51065674 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0248C8FC27 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JZoHt-0000Ti-Ru for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:05 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:05 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:05 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:24:32 +0100 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <20080313131549.GA7984@aurora.oekb.co.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig60B679DF8B9ECFB26978B037" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) In-Reply-To: <20080313131549.GA7984@aurora.oekb.co.at> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: 16GB RAM -> Swap? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:11 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig60B679DF8B9ECFB26978B037 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I've got a Blade-system with 16GB RAM, but "only" one 140GB > harddisk. My question is about swap-space: Traditional knowledge > recommends swap =3D 2*RAM. This would mean 32GB swap (!). >=20 > Should I really go for 32GB swap space? Or will e.g. 16GB (=3D RAM-size= ) > be enough?=20 >=20 > Please note, that I don't do kernel debugging etc. on this machine - > just a production machine used for network monitoring (Mrtg, nfsen, > cacti) The only thing you would probably need swap for on such a machine is to catch kernel core dumps in case something goes wrong. And if you're running 7.0, the dumps no longer include entire memory so you'll need much less space (AFAIK, upto kmem_size will be dumped, and this is limited to 2 GB right now). You don't need any swap at all, but I'd still recommend something like 2 GB, just in case. --------------enig60B679DF8B9ECFB26978B037 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2TkgldnAQVacBcgRAnVnAKDieay4J6bKmfj+tPBEjcwQinO0iACg3YwY 9fIv0XTj+NBeQXcuax77gM0= =Gpit -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig60B679DF8B9ECFB26978B037-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:20:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC7B1065692 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2AF8FC2B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3BCD04FF for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:20:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:14 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080313142014.3fd689cf@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080313130147.70fae093@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <7AB40EFE5B504CD0B1EBF6E0223EB69B@L02D81003> <20080313130147.70fae093@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:19 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:01:47 +0000 RW wrote: > Just set CPUTYPE unless you know what you are doing. I forgot to mention, you can set core2 if you want to. At present, it will be automatically translated into either nocona (64-bit) or prescott (32-bit). See /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk. As a generally rule, start from the assumption that everything that Gentoo users say about setting-up FreeBSD is wrong. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:24:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0C11065675 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6E68FC22 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16D4D051D for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:24:18 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080313142418.5fa04b2c@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080313142014.3fd689cf@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl> <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch> <7AB40EFE5B504CD0B1EBF6E0223EB69B@L02D81003> <20080313130147.70fae093@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080313142014.3fd689cf@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:24:22 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:20:14 +0000 RW wrote: > prescott (32-bit). See /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk. That should be /usr/share/mk/bsd.cpu.mk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:29:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D5F1065674 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001B38FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2DESwij098109; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:28:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080313091550.0258da60@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:28:51 -0500 To: jekillen , FreeBSD Mailing List From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080313-0, 03/13/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jekillen Subject: Re: named questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:29:24 -0000 At 08:59 PM 3/12/2008, jekillen wrote: >Hello: >I have named running as secondary server on v6.2 >It will not start without a specific configuration file set >on the command line. After doing some investigation >it appears that that is because it runs chrooted and >there is not a symlink from /etc/namedb. Is that a correct >assumption? I read the man page and it specifies >the default configuration file as /etc/namedb/named.conf >and along with this file there are master and slave directories. >Would I make the /etc/namedb/named.conf file to be a symlink >to /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf? You can run named chrooted or not. The default is to run chrooted. Look in: /etc/defaults/rc.conf for all the named configuration options and default settings. If you run chrooted be sure your chroot environment has writeable directory for the slave files. >There are some other entries in rc.conf related to named that >appear in my primary nameserver rc.conf file that relate to getting >it up at boot but I have lost root access to that machine so I cannot >recover the rc.conf details and I do not remember what document- >ation I was using to set it up. You should not need root access to read /etc/rc.conf. This is usually given read by all perms. However, in my rc.conf I set: named_chroot_autoupdate="NO" # Automatically install/update chrooted named_chrootdir="" # Chroot directory (or "" not to auto-chroot it) named_enable="YES" named_flags= # quoted string for the command line named_uid= # quoted user name to run as "bind" or "root" >I was advised to start named as a user other than root but when I >tried that named would not start because the user I set it to does >not have write permission in the directory that has the pid file. Your chroot environment must be set up correctly with the correct perms to write those files and to read the named.conf file. >When named starts at boot what user does it run as, by default? It will run by the named_uid you set in /etc/rc.conf You will have an easier time getting named to run via the command line, then set /etc/rc.conf for the correct settings. /usr/sbin/named -c [to the path and name for naed.conf] -u [the user name to run as] -t [chroot directory or omit this setting if not chrooting] -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:30:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ED21065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563AF8FC41 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2DEUIdI011530; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:30:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2DEUIag011529; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:30:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:30:18 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20080313143018.GA11507@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D7CE4E.7030508@alshome.be> <20080312095238.35d257d2.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312151922.GC6354@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312112736.47c2c4b5.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080312154658.GA6696@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080312221432.ff2fd465.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080312221432.ff2fd465.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Superuser password lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:02 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:14:32PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > Because I don't think it's appropriate to drag this conversation on > and on, I'm going to try to answer all the responses in a single > email. > > Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:27:36AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > > No. The term "superuser" is a made-up term for any way of gaining > > > root privs. In my experience it's confusing as there are two > > > commonly used methods for doing this, the su command and sudo, and > > > they require different passwords. > > > > I have never seen the term used that way. > > > > I have seen su and sudo referred to as ways of a non-root id gaining > > superuser priviledge/root priviledge but not a superuser as someone who > > is not root, but has a method of gaining root priviledge. > > Apparently I miscommunicated. My point was that the OP's message used > the term "superuser" in an ambiguous way. (i.e. the way I mentioned). > To me, it wasn't clear what it was asking for, and thus sending the OP > to the PC-BSD community (where folks are probably familiar to the > GUI widget he's dealing with) seemed the best thing to do. I don't really care, but when I read the OP, I believed he was looking for root from what was presented and so that was how I responded. The rest is just small talk. But, asking the PC-BSD folk is not a bad idea. ////jerry > ... > ... > > Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > > > I'd contend that the su manpage *should* say root not superuser, since > > root is hardwired as the default. But for other cases, any user with > > UID 0 might work just as well (e.g. toor). > > I agree on this point, but not enough to bother trying to put a patch > together that (based on the conversation here) is likely to be > controversial. > > -- > Bill Moran > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:32:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F081065679 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85EA8FC19 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:32:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2DEW3Tn001922; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:32:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2DEVv6G001919; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:32:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:31:57 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ewald Jenisch In-Reply-To: <20080313131549.GA7984@aurora.oekb.co.at> Message-ID: <20080313153127.W1918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080313131549.GA7984@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 16GB RAM -> Swap? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:32:24 -0000 > Should I really go for 32GB swap space? Or will e.g. 16GB (= RAM-size) > be enough? i think your programs will fit in 16GB without problems. so don't use swap at all From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 14:46:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B451065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) Received: from cernmxlb.cern.ch (cernmx08.cern.ch [137.138.166.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593298FC1E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Luca.Presotto@cern.ch) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=nOdKlhTsTDRaO5/IuWwAPwboDFXU/M5ivm/zCT8U+NNdKTMcbA1RjvVohCvDCWQQM6wr6lX5vSd5huhzDpySAPTBJYtEPjMJcZiMqIGm9Ni7Fk99FJyZWGPtqhcz3EAG; Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -49 Charset: west-latin X-Filter: CERNMX08 CERN MX v2.0 060921.0942 Release Received: from cernxchg50.cern.ch ([137.138.137.175]) by cernmxlb.cern.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:46:51 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:46:51 +0100 Message-ID: <9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E9F@cernxchg50.cern.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Tuning make.conf Thread-Index: AciFFgXm5tK+t76URZ6S4HoJsLrs2QAAal/5 References: <47D9004D.5070407@planet.nl><9A6A62B6B84859469F3EBB5F09D818CA219E98@cernxchg50.cern.ch><7AB40EFE5B504CD0B1EBF6E0223EB69B@L02D81003><20080313130147.70fae093@gumby.homeunix.com.><20080313142014.3fd689cf@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080313142418.5fa04b2c@gumby.homeunix.com.> From: "Luca Presotto" To: "RW" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2008 14:46:52.0174 (UTC) FILETIME=[132222E0:01C88519] Cc: Subject: RE: Tuning make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:46:56 -0000 Thank you for your answers, you have been very clear! I'm still not into recompiling the kernel for the moment! I will have a look at the way to speed up the various ports building = with the gmake. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 16:06:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BF11065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccnp@mail.ru) Received: from mx45.mail.ru (mx45.mail.ru [194.67.23.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A90A8FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ccnp@mail.ru) Received: from f135.mail.ru (f135.mail.ru [194.67.57.116]) by mx45.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 80C6CE013EB8 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:02:19 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail by f135.mail.ru with local id 1JZkGQ-000DWM-00 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:02:18 +0300 Received: from [194.87.88.39] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:02:18 +0300 From: Ivan Dolgorukov To: questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [194.87.88.39] Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:02:18 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Cc: Subject: can't 'kldload zfs' if loaded not via /boot/loader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ivan Dolgorukov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:06:06 -0000 Hi! I'm trying to boot up from my usb stick using grub 1.96 (/boot/loader gave me the 'BTX halted bug') and I've managed to succeed in that. After booting up in the command promth I've issued 'kldload zfs'. The command gives me 'link_elf: symbol hardlink_check_uid undefined', after that kldload fails. If I boot up from standart /boot/loader (on VMWARE or some other PC) there are no such problems exist. Any ideas how to fix it? My idea is that some variable (kenv or sysctl) is missing and link_elf can't find 'hardlink_check_uid' in /boot/kernel/kernel. P.S. uname -a FreeBSD devil.localdomain 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #5: Wed Mar 12 12:19:10 MSK 2008 root@devil.localdomain:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 diff /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/MYKERNEL 19c19 < # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.474.2.3 2008/02/03 07:28:37 scottl Exp $ --- > # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.474.2.2.2.1 2008/02/06 03:24:28 scottl Exp $ 31c31,32 < options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler --- > #options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler > options SCHED_ULE 69a71,74 > # for flash usb > options ROOTDEVNAME=\"ufs:da0s2a\" > device acpi > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 16:10:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369B61065674 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084E38FC1D for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4009064waf.3 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:10:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=9ngG140bEVm25GcWPt7Z3mURgpSXw2s+UuMou8T0fBQ=; b=YYoQAKO+0Ebj80Ix3iwbKqN9+rojFNUauuGymcPgY8Sy3QSQwmqmJZxow/OURAqiFqRRHS8T8mQu0yinJyCiirR+CZSWICunqNGIJYTXXmbE5Erpqf9qPVWgEJHrrxI1m+I3o+a5PTNK4m7i63LUlOo/ajwIVFqN4T/8Vm4vZGQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=n6x/dUm4apOQxcYeILI5YakIhpc+R4F4gF/Y/MKXB+kdGSYj7+fNxNAKD5cbDTkODIMWddO+Fc01n9ez4iieuDfJcGwqv+RCAp2XFcTTXqofGaCm9QueH47J68xU54QEpnD4OJq3yf6eKbvrM+msee3sB3apAJ3sWgdS/mqoa2A= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr9708486wal.64.1205424601582; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.15 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540803130910l2a5badacxe50cd81ace87e1f7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:10:01 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Network programming question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:10:02 -0000 Hi, I'd like to know why the inet_pton(3) doesn't fill in the address family of the proper structure passed into it. I'm at a complete loss for why. Here's the prototype: int inet_pton(int af, const char * restrict src, void * restrict dst); Three arguments only. The address family, hm, I'm passing it in; the address string in printable ASCII text, and a void pointer to the address structure to put the address into, presumably one of the sockaddr_* family structures for AF_INET or AF_INET6 (further, the man page says that this function is only valid for these two families now anyway). >From some coding for a program, I did find that this function, inet_pton(3), *does* in fact mangle the sin_family member of the sockaddr_in structure, so why not "mangle" it to what it should be? I was doing something like this: // valid code above sockaddr_in sa; sa.sin_family = AF_INET; sa.sin_port = htons(3252); inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", &sa); sendto(sa, msg, strlen(msg), 0, (struct sockaddr*)&sa, sizeof(sa)); The call to sendto is wrapped in an if an was failing for errno code 47, Address family not supported by protocol (I was using UDP). I changed the assignment of AF_INET to the sa.sin_family member to *after* the call to inet_pton(3) and suddenly everything worked. Why? Since the address family was used by inet_pton(3) to figure out how to read the address and assign it to sa.sin_addr.s_addr, why not simply assign AF_INET to the address family member in inet_pton(3)? I'm not trying to be argumentative. I'm just curious. It seems like redundancy. I've used the address family to tell inet_pton(3) how to operate, and then this function can't assign it to the sockaddr_in structure passed to it? This makes little sense. In case it's because I'm using older FBSD libraries that had a flaw fixed, I'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4. Is this because that's how POSIX defined it to work? Is this the right venue or should I try one of the other mailing lists? Thanks, Andy -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 16:25:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3A81065676 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost02.isp.att.net (fmailhost02.isp.att.net [204.127.217.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466928FC21 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:25:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from [10.5.21.122] (adsl-241-161-249.bna.bellsouth.net[74.241.161.249]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc02) with ESMTP id <20080313162501H0200acorae>; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:25:01 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [74.241.161.249] Message-ID: <47D95552.8040006@datapipe.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:24:50 -0500 From: "Paul A. Procacci" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fira References: <465d309c0803122321v7039bfb8l4754846425c9e1f7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <465d309c0803122321v7039bfb8l4754846425c9e1f7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:25:02 -0000 Fira wrote: > Hi list, > > I want to mount my /dev/ad1s1e, but it produce error output : > root# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data1/ > mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted > > I've checked my /var/log/messages, but it doesn't show any message related > to that. > I've fsck that slice, and retried to remount, but it failed again. > Then, I add in my fstab this entry : > ...snip.. > /dev/ad1s1e /data1 ufs rw 2 2 > > and reboot my machine, but still the system didn't want to mount it. > > This is my bsdlabel output : > root# /dev/ad1s1: > 8 partitions: > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > c: 488392002 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > edit > d: 163840000 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > e: 122880000 163840000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > f: 163840000 286720000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > g: 37832002 450560000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > In my understanding, ad1s1e has been formatted into ufs, and I think there > should be no problem to mount it. > > So, where is the point of my mistake? > > Thanks a lot for your responses. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > What's your securelevel? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 17:17:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27761065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B413A8FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2DHHKhe012234; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:17:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2DHHK5m012233; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:17:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:17:20 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: "Paul A. Procacci" Message-ID: <20080313171720.GA12198@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <465d309c0803122321v7039bfb8l4754846425c9e1f7@mail.gmail.com> <47D95552.8040006@datapipe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D95552.8040006@datapipe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Fira , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:17:12 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:24:50AM -0500, Paul A. Procacci wrote: > Fira wrote: > >Hi list, > > > >I want to mount my /dev/ad1s1e, but it produce error output : > >root# mount /dev/ad1s1e /data1/ > >mount: /dev/ad1s1e: Operation not permitted > > > >I've checked my /var/log/messages, but it doesn't show any message related > >to that. > >I've fsck that slice, and retried to remount, but it failed again. > >Then, I add in my fstab this entry : > >...snip.. > >/dev/ad1s1e /data1 ufs rw 2 2 > > > >and reboot my machine, but still the system didn't want to mount it. > > > >This is my bsdlabel output : > >root# /dev/ad1s1: > >8 partitions: > ># size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > > c: 488392002 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, > > don't > >edit > > d: 163840000 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > e: 122880000 163840000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > f: 163840000 286720000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > g: 37832002 450560000 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > > > >In my understanding, ad1s1e has been formatted into ufs, and I think there > >should be no problem to mount it. > > > >So, where is the point of my mistake? > >Thanks a lot for your responses. Hmmm. It is difficult to know from this, but here are some questions to check. First, are you doing the mount command as root or a regular user? you generally need to be root unless you set up some extra things. Second, is /dev/ad1s1e already mounted somethere ? run df -k and see if it shows up. Third, what are the ownership and permissions on /data1 ? Fourth, was newfs run on the /dev/ad1s1e partition? Note, that /dev/ad1s1e is a partition not a slice. the associated slice is ad1s1 (eg without specifying the 'e' partition) In FreeBSD, a slice is the primary division of the disk identified by the numbers 1..4 and partitions are subdivisions of slices identified by letters a..h where 'c' is reserved for system use, 'a' is for root on the boot slice but can be anything on other slices and 'b' is commonly used for swap on any drive/slice. ////jerry > > > What's your securelevel? That is another possible issue if the OP messed around with it. /jrm > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 17:26:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8671065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EAA8FC13 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:26:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0071CD18; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:26:02 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:11:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803131311.29221.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: jekillen Subject: Re: named questions. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:26:04 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008 02:59:35 jekillen wrote: > I have named running as secondary server on v6.2 > It will not start without a specific configuration file set > on the command line. After doing some investigation > it appears that that is because it runs chrooted and > there is not a symlink from /etc/namedb. You should start it by: echo 'named_enable="YES"' >>/etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.d/named start This should by default create the symlink and populate the chroot directory. If there is already a directory /etc/namedb or a file /etc/namedb it will warn you. Have a look at /etc/rc.d/named and the named_ variables in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 17:31:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14D91065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9353C8FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 343 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 17:29:56 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 13 Mar 2008 17:29:56 -0000 Message-ID: <47D96335.9050500@chuckr.org> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:24:05 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Predrag Punosevac References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> <47D83D17.1060601@math.arizona.edu> In-Reply-To: <47D83D17.1060601@math.arizona.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org, Gligor Lucian Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:31:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: > Gligor Lucian wrote: > >>>> David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at >>>> 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> > > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I > can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on > FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other > systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also > tried HP > officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work with > cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, but > either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but > nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. > > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear > about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. > > >> Please do not spread disinformation. Of course CUPS works on FreeBSD as >> well as thee other spooling systems >> PDQ, LPD, and LPRng. Well, YOU might note that I _did_ say that others did work (I even gave an example, apsfilter, that worked) and I specified that cups itself worked, just that the job of installing drivers in cups for FreeBSD seemed undocumented. Someone since then found for me a wiki (non-FreeBSD- you note) that gives more help, but it seems that no helkp is forthcoming from FreeBSD itself. I specified in the email that non-local printers, which only use default ps drivers worked fine also, it was only when you tried to install locally based printers, which need local drivers, that you end up in trouble. If you're going to criticize, at least try to read the post first. Cups on FreeBSD is still woefully underdocumented, relying 100% on others sites, when the cups installation has been changed (somewhat) to agree with hier(7). I agree that needed to be done, and would have been complaining if it hadn't, but then there should have been some small notes detailing how to install a local driver. As a general rule in FreeBDS ports, there is (on most ports that have more than 1 version) insufficient care given to detailing the differences in ports, when there are more than one version to choose from. Example? the cups and the cups-base port have the same pkg-descr, so how is anyone to know what the difference is, and under whjat circumstances should one port be chosen over another. Don't answer that question, answer why no care is ever given to correct the woeful state of most multi-option pkg-descr files. >> Cheers, >> Predrag > > > > >>>> Thank you very much for your answer. >>>> All the best, Gligor Lucian. >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------- >>>> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! >>>> Search. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2WM1z62J6PPcoOkRAjQSAKCZ2BR4Z/+qZwydoNllRKZNCNtgxACeLMEU KBp7od1fCaxhw4t9NohhX2c= =pvtD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 17:41:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFD41065679 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2426A8FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:41:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1531CD18; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:41:26 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:41:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D825B6.1050207@fechner.net> <200803122021.25842.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47D90964.4010605@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: <47D90964.4010605@fechner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803131841.24798.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Matthias Fechner Subject: Re: Source Upgrade to FreeBSD 7 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:41:27 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008 12:00:52 Matthias Fechner wrote: > Hi Mel, > > Mel schrieb: > > How ever did you get something in /usr/src looking for /usr/local/lib/*? > > hm not really. I deleted now /usr/src and /usr/obj, did a fresh cvsup > and got the same error message. > > > What's in /etc/make.conf please? > > hm, that is a bit longer but here: > WITH_OPENLDAP=yes libssl.so.4, needed by /usr/local/lib/libldap.so, not found And it looks as though, /usr/src/kerberos5/Makefile.inc sets OPENLDAPBASE to /usr/local if WITH_OPENLDAP is defined. So, chicken and egg problem for you, either fix your openldap build, that currently depends on a non-existing libssl.so.4 (from 6.x I presume) or unset WITH_OPENLDAP for the purpose of building world and then upgrade your ports. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 17:45:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF561065673 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from ns.mahan.org (ns.mahan.org [67.116.10.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9E18FC24 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from widowmaker.local (crowTrobot [67.116.10.140]) by ns.mahan.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2DHjWtH069328; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:45:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Message-ID: <47D9682B.5060402@mahan.org> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:45:15 -0700 From: Patrick Mahan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540803130910l2a5badacxe50cd81ace87e1f7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540803130910l2a5badacxe50cd81ace87e1f7@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Network programming question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:45:17 -0000 Andrew Falanga presented these words - circa 3/13/08 9:10 AM-> > Hi, > > I'd like to know why the inet_pton(3) doesn't fill in the address > family of the proper structure passed into it. I'm at a complete loss > for why. Here's the prototype: > > int inet_pton(int af, const char * restrict src, void * restrict dst); > > > Three arguments only. The address family, hm, I'm passing it in; the > address string in printable ASCII text, and a void pointer to the > address structure to put the address into, presumably one of the > sockaddr_* family structures for AF_INET or AF_INET6 (further, the man > page says that this function is only valid for these two families now > anyway). > >>From some coding for a program, I did find that this function, > inet_pton(3), *does* in fact mangle the sin_family member of the > sockaddr_in structure, so why not "mangle" it to what it should be? I > was doing something like this: > > // valid code above > sockaddr_in sa; > > sa.sin_family = AF_INET; > sa.sin_port = htons(3252); > > inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", &sa); > > sendto(sa, msg, strlen(msg), 0, (struct sockaddr*)&sa, sizeof(sa)); > See man inet_pton . . . for details. Briefly, inet_pton() doesn't understand sockaddr structures. Instead, it only understands in_addr or in6_addr structures which are included inside the sockaddr structure. So your above example should be changed to // valid code above sockaddr_in sa; int res; sa.sin_family = AF_INET; sa.sin_port = htons(3252); if ((res = inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", &sa.sin_addr)) < 0) perror("inet_pton"); if (!res) // error occurred fprintf(stderr, "Address notation incorrect for AF_INET address\n"); > > The call to sendto is wrapped in an if an was failing for errno code > 47, Address family not supported by protocol (I was using UDP). I > changed the assignment of AF_INET to the sa.sin_family member to > *after* the call to inet_pton(3) and suddenly everything worked. Why? > Since the address family was used by inet_pton(3) to figure out how > to read the address and assign it to sa.sin_addr.s_addr, why not > simply assign AF_INET to the address family member in inet_pton(3)? > Because it is treating the sockaddr_in structure as an in_addr structure which is clobbering the sin_family field. > I'm not trying to be argumentative. I'm just curious. It seems like > redundancy. I've used the address family to tell inet_pton(3) how to > operate, and then this function can't assign it to the sockaddr_in > structure passed to it? This makes little sense. In case it's > because I'm using older FBSD libraries that had a flaw fixed, I'm > using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4. Is this because that's how POSIX > defined it to work? Is this the right venue or should I try one of > the other mailing lists? > RTM, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 18:11:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE961065674 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93C88FC19 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so558733uge.37 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:11:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=H+k7LWoDF8h8CRN6LkfH5dZ1G3Yx1/91fQ8u0ssJY44=; b=gRTJBztFJw/IkywttC8lq2lVC2CdLe845y3/5I4WiNwXGZ01pWMdpJUR59lvpg+Ai4pxK+IPRLHF7DVKJA6m6Q/z5S4wPvWfJ0Ga8ujPWft09GX/F3+4bZZJyt5RyJS3HTsRNvulkpQHTX5eIvOJjM03daeJRf3wNss+7TFv5Nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L+VvZ7KIhJHk7t5hRV2q2lELDnWhwv3NS9LxMSIheGx2kkoh+LoqiKf5AYJCL9c1kRMUu7HTWfQ4ISO8JFffTMLX2nyb30JgxuVYDP0OBeJmVRvALvemjNuT4iZXgn0qXwVzFzK5h4qjfUnDFhdmJEpDhQElFX5dppeFrCuxMzY= Received: by 10.114.156.1 with SMTP id d1mr9940808wae.120.1205431888343; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.15 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540803131111g20315740n629ee146bc2f8602@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:11:28 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Patrick Mahan" In-Reply-To: <47D9682B.5060402@mahan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540803130910l2a5badacxe50cd81ace87e1f7@mail.gmail.com> <47D9682B.5060402@mahan.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Network programming question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:11:31 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Patrick Mahan wrote: > > > Andrew Falanga presented these words - circa 3/13/08 9:10 AM-> > > > Hi, > > See man inet_pton . . . for details. > > Briefly, inet_pton() doesn't understand sockaddr structures. Instead, > it only understands in_addr or in6_addr structures which are included > inside the sockaddr structure. So your above example should be changed > to > Ok, I should have thought of that when reading the manual. > > if ((res = inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", &sa.sin_addr)) < 0) > perror("inet_pton"); > > > Because it is treating the sockaddr_in structure as an in_addr structure > which is clobbering the sin_family field. > If this is true, then why are my packets sent at all? The definition of sockaddr_in (from /usr/include/netinet/in.h): struct sockaddr_in { uint8_t sin_len; sa_family_t sin_family; in_port_t sin_port; struct in_addr sin_addr; char sin_zero[8]; }; The definition of in_addr (from /usr/include/netinet/in.h): struct in_addr { in_addr_t s_addr; }; The definition of in_addr_t (from /usr/include/netinet/in.h): typedef uint32_t in_addr_t; Passing in what I have, the address should indeed (as you've pointed out) clobber the sin_family member. However, since in_addr is basically an unsigned integer, i.e. 4 bytes wide, shouldn't inet_pton(3) clobber sin_len, sin_family & sin_port before ever reaching sin_addr? The sin_len & sin_family are 8 bit quantities, the sin_port is 16 bits, that's 32. If inet_pton(3) is expecting only an in_addr I would think that a call to sendto(2) would fail because the address in sin_addr is not filled, correct? Andy -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 18:41:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA111065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A562B8FC14 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 20069 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2008 18:41:55 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 13 Mar 2008 18:41:55 -0000 Message-ID: <47D97415.5000005@chuckr.org> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:36:05 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: pam problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:41:56 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 My messages file is getting completely blasted by error lines like this: Mar 13 11:16:03 april sshd[80704]: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_nologin.so: no pam_sm_authenticate() Anyone got any idea what's causing this? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH2XQUz62J6PPcoOkRAhcuAJ40wFjLvU+P2UCp6baz7b78Lt36wgCfX8p4 y5miBxcZ9Da6l1RGvo15v5s= =qbD5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 18:49:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1051065673 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesh@lanl.gov) Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov (mailwasher.lanl.gov [204.121.3.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A458FC21 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesh@lanl.gov) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 108365406FD; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:42 -0600 (MDT) X-CTN-5-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailwasher.lanl.gov Received: from mailwasher.lanl.gov (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17CC54079A; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:41 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mailrelay3.lanl.gov (mailrelay3.lanl.gov [128.165.4.104]) by mailwasher.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76885406FD; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:41 -0600 (MDT) Received: from oppie-mail.lanl.gov (oppie-mail.lanl.gov [128.165.4.123]) by mailrelay3.lanl.gov (8.13.8/8.13.8/(ccn-5)) with ESMTP id m2DIneqE019384; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:40 -0600 Received: from [128.165.86.60] (p25dual1.lanl.gov [128.165.86.60]) by oppie-mail.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E4C1F8002; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:33 -0600 (MDT) From: James Harrison To: Chuck Robey In-Reply-To: <47D97415.5000005@chuckr.org> References: <47D97415.5000005@chuckr.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Los Alamos National Labs Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:49:33 -0600 Message-Id: <1205434173.20999.46.camel@p25dual1.lanl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-40.el5_1.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTN-5-MailScanner-Information: Please see http://network.lanl.gov/email/virus-scan.php X-CTN-5-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CTN-5-MailScanner-From: jamesh@lanl.gov X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pam problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jamesh@lanl.gov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:49:43 -0000 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2007-September/159008.html That cover you? On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:36 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > My messages file is getting completely blasted by error lines like this: > > Mar 13 11:16:03 april sshd[80704]: in openpam_dispatch(): pam_nologin.so: > no pam_sm_authenticate() > > Anyone got any idea what's causing this? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFH2XQUz62J6PPcoOkRAhcuAJ40wFjLvU+P2UCp6baz7b78Lt36wgCfX8p4 > y5miBxcZ9Da6l1RGvo15v5s= > =qbD5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 19:01:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4FC106568D for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edlinuxguru@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B1A8FC1B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:01:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edlinuxguru@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c49so2984592wra.19 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:01:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=JzxzXEwf4IaC0r8O4O/5kKReHoe7nFKgQ1w4D+R2Uoo=; b=tnVId1gk8cjSR5TFAxufzUFI0Qkv17OLAkW+jyfsHGuTZ5uR6UBBzILSrwKWDWVyBF7RQnIlDSCW0hcWnZs3BzARKLaV4QIcIe/M/udDN6FG6VdSEf/f3W4B9q3OSKtRODzphsEppzlz5nFLCyDn6mc3aqS1QlvzODnQwWOXyAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=HhUPYweUylPY/i47/N0adzQ39K1JsjJedFswl/yqcH5bWZG5v5g7BJCS1jB9pouNs0cIpC+NlOu36BfTkxvnbadRhR1vAdL6XfwGrvSGYN7lQ/WyJItiYmLBWw2zIrwStl44Hw6Xal4o5nRrmbfnOz6/82fW+1lC0gJHTfEn1H8= Received: by 10.140.192.9 with SMTP id p9mr1166012rvf.193.1205434885680; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.63.19 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:01:25 -0400 From: "Eddie C" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: free BSD An Approach for Using LDAP as a Network Information Service X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:01:27 -0000 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2307.html It seems to me that netgroups over LDAP is a powerful concept. From my research into free BSD 6.2 and freeBSD 7.0 it seems that the /etc/nsswitch.conf does not support the netgroups: database. Is there any initiative to implement the functionality of the RFC? Is anyone else using a similar login system? The only way i see to accomplish anything similar is use the filter options of nss_ldap and custom attributes to develop your own workalike nss->ldap From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 19:39:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70271065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: from pop3.ihlas.net.tr (smtp.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1746E8FC1A for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maslak@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 57310 invoked by uid 89); 13 Mar 2008 19:13:11 -0000 X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff-II-2.1 (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/) Received: from unknown (HELO ihlasnetym) (maslak@ihlas.net.tr@213.238.150.220) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2008 19:13:10 -0000 Message-ID: <00c401c8853e$45f6ae00$dc96eed5@ihlasnetym> From: "Yavuz Maslak" To: Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:13:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Subject: Boot problem after reboot during upgrade from frebsd6.1 to freebsd7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:39:55 -0000 I followed http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html to upgrade freebsd6.1 to 7.0. I forgot compile kernel for freebsd7.0. and I rebooted the machine. The server didn't give any error message during the upgrade. The server tried to boot at freebsd6.1. and it could not boot the system. it came " Enter full path of shell" on the screen. How can I do correct that ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:07:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B481065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from ghirai.com (ghirai.com [193.33.187.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D618FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:07:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from deimos.bsd.nix (unknown [89.123.5.114]) by ghirai.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D555316F3C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:07:48 +0200 From: Ghirai To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:07:51 -0000 Hey, I'm running 7.0-RELEASE, x86, SMP. Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / I suspect it's since i upgraded from 7.0-rcX couple times. Any idea where i should start looking for files that are not needed? Thanks. -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:14:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B8A1065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F0B8FC31 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2008 16:14:10 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OMX06264; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:14:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2008 15:13:11 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:22 -0400 To: Ghirai In-Reply-To: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:11 -0000 Ghirai writes: > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / Start with /tmp. Also: du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 25 Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:14:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B238106567B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A168FC27 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B555D3B; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:14:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWVBsNe2lSU4; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:14:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4593B5D1A; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:14:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <70C5EFFD-3B3D-4CA8-AB20-FFC86166BEB8@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Ghirai In-Reply-To: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:14:34 -0700 References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:14:39 -0000 Hi, Ghirai-- On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Ghirai wrote: > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / > > I suspect it's since i upgraded from 7.0-rcX couple times. > > Any idea where i should start looking for files that are not needed? Well, I can tell you how to figure out which directories are consuming space: du -xd1 / Add -h to the flags if you prefer "human-readable" output. Give us that output and we can probably advise you further, if it doesn't help clarify things enough for you to figure out what to do... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:29:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0035A1065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80DA8FC2B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:29:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so5242834pyb.10 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:29:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=IRVb+Tc01TxXexzk20M4i7SayscIO8Gwx8/ix33TZXY=; b=GGT8s9QLpuAvayzFUOUWbbhKjYcTLucqUydgfCk6JlKMlf0Nx6+51867tSe7KVBFc9dfZsrBRhcvEBFwEWEJJqTaO3W1rmbVi8O8X/1xOFp6vrp6w5iFHLXuTGqG2O8FLg6UJRU/1Jc42HFMuP808fTx9tMttvZJuw4CK8guwLo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JBh6iw5+g4UoBT1CQW49TvDiaUFFxEJOcSC5h1zJUgYSyHUFYKrGfUR8EOz/Vq7CqGe4pHIz6PiuSrzZ8/IBqnY9F/XrCCkpiWqIe1BZ8RxAm02m+v+6Yc3wozFaoYYZ4V0nUt47xfGRPFdqcL4Wu3nV3DSf2CxmEpkVP4nJu4c= Received: by 10.65.235.7 with SMTP id m7mr21578766qbr.33.1205440156344; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.209.5 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f916c90803131329t2f8238bdu2ea7abb5f0fa487d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:29:16 +0000 From: "Kemian Dang" To: "Oliver Herold" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080312125148.GA42727@asgard.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f916c90803120317w1d5a9277j5c49cc1109bcf4e4@mail.gmail.com> <20080312125148.GA42727@asgard.home> Cc: Subject: Re: xpdf segmentation fault on FreeBSD 7.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:29:18 -0000 No, I use the default configuration. It used to be OK, and it seems become fault after I upgrade from FB7 RC4 -> Release... Anyway, thank you for reply. Cheers, Kemian On 12/03/2008, Oliver Herold wrote: > No, I'm using it without any problems. Maybe you have some strange > configuration in /etc/make.conf? > > Cheers, > > Oliver > > > Kemian Dang wrote: > > Hi, all, > > > > I have installed xpdf 3.02 on a FreeBSD 7.0 Release Box without > > problem, I can use "xpdf -h" to get the help information, But when > > ever I just use "xpdf" or "xpdf some.pdf", it will give a > > "segmentation fault" and without any other note. > > Is there any one have met such things and please suggest me how can I solve it? > > > > Best wishes, > > Kemian > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- > Q: How do you shoot a blue elephant? > A: With a blue-elephant gun. > > Q: How do you shoot a pink elephant? > A: Twist its trunk until it turns blue, then shoot it with > a blue-elephant gun. > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:36:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDCA106576E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:36:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from ghirai.com (ghirai.com [193.33.187.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0AAA8FC18 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from deimos.bsd.nix (unknown [89.123.5.114]) by ghirai.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4547016F37 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:36:57 +0200 From: Ghirai To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:36:59 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:22 -0400 Robert Huff wrote: > > Ghirai writes: > > > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / > > Start with /tmp. > Also: > > du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 25 > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): 986K /bin 512B /dev 366K /etc/rc.d 270K /lib/geom 250K /etc/mail 170K /libexec 138K /etc/ssh 137M / 121M /boot 118K /etc/periodic 116K /etc/defaults 112M /boot/kernel /tmp is ~2MiB. Atm. i have no clue how df reports 454M used... Thanks. -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:49:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1C51065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FC18FC2E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7115D3B; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:49:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8gkyBM0wDRC; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:49:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C2985C7E; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:49:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Ghirai In-Reply-To: <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:49:11 -0700 References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:49:15 -0000 On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Ghirai wrote: > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > [ ... ] > 121M /boot > 118K /etc/periodic > 116K /etc/defaults > 112M /boot/kernel > > /tmp is ~2MiB. > > Atm. i have no clue how df reports 454M used... Your kernel tree is huge-- on a 6.x system, that's normally around 25MB. If you have a /boot/kernel.old, you can delete that, but you should double-check whether you've specified non-default compiler flags or something which might cause this. Also, if you've deleted things like old logfiles without restarting the daemons or syslogd, you might want to reboot and then recheck the disk usage... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 20:56:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428151065677 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from ghirai.com (ghirai.com [193.33.187.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F908FC2A for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:56:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from deimos.bsd.nix (unknown [89.123.5.114]) by ghirai.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49EF316F37; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:56:46 +0200 From: Ghirai To: Chuck Swiger Message-Id: <20080313225646.a98e6393.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:56:48 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:49:11 -0700 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Ghirai wrote: > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > > > [ ... ] > > 121M /boot > > 118K /etc/periodic > > 116K /etc/defaults > > 112M /boot/kernel > > > > /tmp is ~2MiB. > > > > Atm. i have no clue how df reports 454M used... > > Your kernel tree is huge-- on a 6.x system, that's normally around > 25MB. If you have a /boot/kernel.old, you can delete that, but you > should double-check whether you've specified non-default compiler > flags or something which might cause this. Also, if you've deleted > things like old logfiles without restarting the daemons or syslogd, > you might want to reboot and then recheck the disk usage... > > -- > -Chuck > Are there supposed to be .ko.symbols near the .ko files in /boot/kernel? Those would account for ~80MiB. Also i have a total of 1041 files in /boot/kernel. -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:01:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0F01065678 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADE68FC2C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9FE5C6A; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:01:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KvBCS7ZZvvFw; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:01:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16D475CF3; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:01:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <61A68A7B-779E-449B-8BBB-8D76AD845CBA@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Ghirai In-Reply-To: <20080313225646.a98e6393.ghirai@ghirai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:01:52 -0700 References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> <20080313225646.a98e6393.ghirai@ghirai.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:01:56 -0000 On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Ghirai wrote: > Are there supposed to be .ko.symbols near the .ko files in /boot/ > kernel? > Those would account for ~80MiB. > > Also i have a total of 1041 files in /boot/kernel. They're used for debugging, but can be deleted if you aren't doing kernel hacking or trying to generate a backtrace from a panic. I have ~480 files under /boot/kernel on a 6.3 system.... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:14:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC511065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F2D8FC25 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEF21CD18; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:14:50 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:06:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803132206.59355.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Ghirai Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:14:51 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008 21:36:57 Ghirai wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:22 -0400 > > Robert Huff wrote: > > Ghirai writes: > > > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / > > > > Start with /tmp. > > Also: > > > > du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 25 > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > > 986K /bin > 512B /dev > 366K /etc/rc.d > 270K /lib/geom > 250K /etc/mail > 170K /libexec > 138K /etc/ssh > 137M / > 121M /boot > 118K /etc/periodic > 116K /etc/defaults > 112M /boot/kernel > > /tmp is ~2MiB. > > Atm. i have no clue how df reports 454M used... That's cause you did du -xh | sort, so you're missing the 90M entries. Then again, it reports 137M for /. So, very likely there's a file in /tmp that's unlinked but still opened by a program. fstat -f / or fstat -u myuid should give you a clue. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:14:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BE21065673 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B21C8FC28 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:14:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5065E1CDE4; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:14:51 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:14:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803132214.49024.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:14:52 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008 21:49:11 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 13, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Ghirai wrote: > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > > [ ... ] > > > 121M /boot > > 118K /etc/periodic > > 116K /etc/defaults > > 112M /boot/kernel > > > > /tmp is ~2MiB. > > > > Atm. i have no clue how df reports 454M used... > > Your kernel tree is huge-- on a 6.x system, that's normally around > 25MB. Yeah, but that went up with 7. Majorly. here's one from a 7.x kernel, generic, but with ULE instead of 4BSD: # du -sh /boot/kernel 113M /boot/kernel Also: ssh seven.stable "ls /boot/kernel" |while read FILE; do if test \! -f /boot/kernel/${FILE}; then echo $FILE; fi ; done|wc -l 577 -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:16:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF3A1065671 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75DF8FC1A for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2DLGTSY013241; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:16:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2DLGTqV013240; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:16:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:16:29 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Ghirai Message-ID: <20080313211629.GB13059@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:16:15 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:36:57PM +0200, Ghirai wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:22 -0400 > Robert Huff wrote: > > > > > Ghirai writes: > > > > > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / > > > > Start with /tmp. > > Also: > > > > du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 25 > > > > > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > > 986K /bin > 512B /dev > 366K /etc/rc.d > 270K /lib/geom > 250K /etc/mail > 170K /libexec > 138K /etc/ssh > 137M / > 121M /boot > 118K /etc/periodic > 116K /etc/defaults > 112M /boot/kernel > > /tmp is ~2MiB. try doing a df -k to see what file systems are really there and what they have in them. Then go in to root (/) and do ls -laF That may provide some clues. ////jerry > > Atm. i have no clue how df reports 454M used... > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards, > Ghirai. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:32:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E080D106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:32:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from squid@iog.org.ua) Received: from tazek.iog.org.ua (tazek.iog.org.ua [193.33.49.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726BE8FC16 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from squid@iog.org.ua) Received: from [10.10.10.9] (dodekaedr.techs.com.ua [193.109.101.2]) by tazek.iog.org.ua (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2247A11435 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:12:14 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <47D998AD.2030505@iog.org.ua> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:12:13 +0200 From: Kirill Alpeev User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mpd problem - CCP: rec'd Reset Request X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:32:26 -0000 Hello, There's a problem with my MPD which I cannot reproduce but it appears from time to time. Here's complete session log and mpd configs: Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] using interface ng0 Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] link: OPEN event Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: Open event Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: LayerStart Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: pptp0: connecting to 193.33.48.3 1723 Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: pptp0: connected to 193.33.48.3 1723 Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: pptp0: attached to connection with 193.33.48.3 1723 Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: pptp0-0: outgoing call connected at 64000 bps Mar 10 08:26:23 tazek mpd: [pptp] PPTP call successful Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] link: UP event Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] link: origination is local Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: Up event Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: ACFCOMP Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: PROTOCOMP Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: ACCMAP 0x000a0000 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: MRU 1460 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: MAGICNUM 50e25050 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: rec'd Configure Ack #1 (Req-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: ACFCOMP Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: PROTOCOMP Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: ACCMAP 0x000a0000 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: MRU 1460 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: MAGICNUM 50e25050 Mar 10 08:26:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Rcvd Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Ack-Rcvd --> Req-Sent Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: SendConfigReq #2 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACFCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: PROTOCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACCMAP 0x000a0000 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: MRU 1460 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: MAGICNUM 50e25050 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: rec'd Configure Ack #2 (Req-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACFCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: PROTOCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACCMAP 0x000a0000 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: MRU 1460 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: MAGICNUM 50e25050 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Rcvd Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Ack-Rcvd) Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACCMAP 0x00000000 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: MAGICNUM e11b37fd Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: PROTOCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACFCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: SendConfigAck #1 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACCMAP 0x00000000 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: MAGICNUM e11b37fd Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: PROTOCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: ACFCOMP Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: state change Ack-Rcvd --> Opened Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: auth: peer wants CHAP, I want nothing Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: LayerUp Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: [pptp] CHAP: rec'd CHALLENGE #153 Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: Name: "pptpd" Mar 10 08:26:26 tazek mpd: Using authname "u_sn_kpenergy" Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CHAP: sending RESPONSE len:63 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CHAP: rec'd SUCCESS #153 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: MESG: S=8A3A5371D391A9E723EC05269806C81EA5F42125 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] LCP: authorization successful Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] Bundle up: 1 link, total bandwidth 64000 bps Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: Open event Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: state change Initial --> Starting Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: LayerStart Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: Open event Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: state change Initial --> Starting Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: LayerStart Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: Up event Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: SendConfigReq #1 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: IPADDR 192.168.132.26 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: Up event Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: SendConfigReq #1 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: MPPC Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] can't get stats, link=0: Invalid argument Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: MPPC Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: SendConfigAck #1 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: MPPC Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: rec'd Terminate Ack #1 (Req-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Configure Ack #1 (Ack-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: MPPC Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: LayerUp Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: Compress using: mppc (MPPE(128 bits), stateless) Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: Decompress using: mppc (MPPE(128 bits), stateless) Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, allow comp-cid Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: IPADDR 172.16.30.42 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: 172.16.30.42 is OK Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: SendConfigAck #1 Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, allow comp-cid Mar 10 08:26:27 tazek mpd: IPADDR 172.16.30.42 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: SendConfigReq #2 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: IPADDR 192.168.132.26 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: rec'd Configure Nak #2 (Ack-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: IPADDR 193.33.49.198 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: 193.33.49.198 is OK Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: SendConfigReq #3 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: IPADDR 193.33.49.198 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: rec'd Configure Ack #3 (Ack-Sent) Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: IPADDR 193.33.49.198 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IPCP: LayerUp Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: 193.33.49.198 -> 172.16.30.42 Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] IFACE: Up event Mar 10 08:26:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] rec'd unexpected protocol IP Mar 13 09:16:03 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #2 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:17 tazek mpd: last message repeated 13 times Mar 13 09:16:17 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #3 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:21 tazek mpd: last message repeated 2 times Mar 13 09:16:21 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #4 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:22 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #5 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:29 tazek mpd: last message repeated 5 times Mar 13 09:16:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #6 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:57 tazek mpd: last message repeated 26 times Mar 13 09:16:57 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #7 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:59 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #7 (Opened) Mar 13 09:16:59 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #8 (Opened) Mar 13 09:17:15 tazek mpd: last message repeated 14 times Mar 13 09:17:15 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #9 (Opened) Mar 13 09:17:17 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #9 (Opened) Mar 13 09:17:17 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #10 (Opened) Mar 13 09:17:29 tazek mpd: last message repeated 10 times Mar 13 09:17:29 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #11 (Opened) Mar 13 09:17:35 tazek mpd: last message repeated 5 times Mar 13 09:17:35 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #12 (Opened) Mar 13 09:17:46 tazek mpd: last message repeated 10 times Mar 13 09:17:46 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #13 (Opened) Mar 13 09:18:24 tazek mpd: last message repeated 36 times Mar 13 09:18:24 tazek mpd: [pptp] CCP: rec'd Reset Request #14 (Opened) Mar 13 09:18:43 tazek mpd: last message repeated 17 times [that messages repeated until I reset connection manually] mpd.conf: pptp: new -i ng0 pptp pptp set iface route default set iface disable on-demand set iface disable proxy-arp set iface enable tcpmssfix set iface idle 0 set bundle disable multilink set bundle yes compression set bundle disable noretry set auth authname "u_sn_kpenergy" set auth password "password" set link accept acfcomp protocomp set link accept chap set link keep-alive 10 60 set link max-redial 0 set link mtu 1460 set link mru 1460 set ipcp yes vjcomp set ccp yes mppc set ccp no mpp-e40 set ccp yes mpp-e128 set ccp yes mpp-stateless open mpd.links: pptp: set phys type pptp set pptp peer 193.33.48.3 set pptp enable originate set pptp disable incoming set pptp disable windowing set pptp disable delayed-ack I'm open to any suggestions. My ISP is of no use unfortunately, those Linux lovers... :) 10x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:40:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6601065675 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1278FC34 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12811CD18; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:40:03 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:40:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803121916.47569.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47D8DBC0.3010106@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <47D8DBC0.3010106@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:40:05 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008 08:46:08 Leslie Jensen wrote: > Mel skrev: > > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 15:28:25 Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> The compile error I get is > >> > >> Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted > >> > >> Any suggestions? > > > > Details maybe? Just one line that's a pretty generic error message, > > that's likely to be caused by system limits, isn't gonna get you much > > help. The entire compilation line, the failure up until make returns > > control back to the shell, that's what you'll need to provide at minimum. > > Yes of course, here are some details: > > bsdpc01# uname -a > FreeBSD bsdpc01.homenet.home 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun Feb > 24 19:59:52 UTC 2008 > root@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > > portsnap fetch update > > All ports up to date, otherwise compiled and installed. > > cd /usr/ports/x11/kdebase3/ > > make > > ---------------------------------------- > c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include > -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -I/usr/local/include > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -D_GETOPT_H -D_THREAD_SAFE > -D_LARGE_FILES=1 -Wno-long-long -Wundef -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith > -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe > -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common > -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_ASCII_CAST -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_COMPAT > -DQT_NO_TRANSLATION -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT kdcoplistview.o -MD -MP -MF > .deps/kdcoplistview.Tpo -c -o kdcoplistview.o kdcoplistview.cpp > mv -f .deps/kdcoplistview.Tpo .deps/kdcoplistview.Po > /usr/local/bin/moc kdcopview.h -o kdcopview.moc > rm -f kdcopview.cpp > echo '#include ' > kdcopview.cpp > echo '#include ' >> kdcopview.cpp > /usr/local/bin/uic -L /usr/local/lib/kde3/plugins/designer -nounload -tr > tr2i18n -i kdcopview.h ./kdcopview.ui > kdcopview.cpp.temp ; ret=$?; \ > /usr/local/bin/perl -pe "s,tr2i18n( \"\" ),QString::null,g" > kdcopview.cpp.temp | /usr/local/bin/perl -pe "s,tr2i18n( \"\"\, \"\" > ),QString::null,g" | /usr/local/bin/perl -pe > "s,image([0-9][0-9]*)_data,img\$1_kdcopview,g" | /usr/local/bin/perl -pe > "s,: QWizard\(,: KWizard(,g" >> kdcopview.cpp ;\ > rm -f kdcopview.cpp.temp ;\ > if test "$ret" = 0; then echo '#include "kdcopview.moc"' >> > kdcopview.cpp; else rm -f kdcopview.cpp ; exit $ret ; fi > Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted I think you mixed some threading libraries. That string or variants of it, is nowhere to be found in /usr/src anymore. I found this post: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2004-March/001759.html Any of that relevant for you? like entries in libmap? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 21:45:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FAB106566B for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from a.cs.okstate.edu (a.cs.okstate.edu [139.78.113.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222BD8FC19 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lreid@cs.okstate.edu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.cs.okstate.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1EE154F20 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:45:39 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <47D9A07F.5040108@cs.okstate.edu> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:45:35 -0500 From: Reid Linnemann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071211) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions References: <47D8C274.5030107@cs.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <47D8C274.5030107@cs.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: DRI on radeon 9500 using too wide memory bus? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:45:40 -0000 Written by Reid Linnemann on 03/13/08 00:58>> > I've had DRI running on a radeon 9500 for a while now, and at some point > in time tracking 6-STABLE and continuing now on 7-STABLE I've started > seeing rendering artifacts in gl in the form of a cross-hatch pattern of > pixels that don't get filled. At first I figured the card was failing, > but I remembered a fact about the 9500 that made me doublethink that. > > The radeon 9500 is an r300 chipset, and differs from the 9700 only in > the width of the memory bus (128 bit vs 256 bit) and possibly clock > speed. If memory serves, the chip itself had the capacity to address 256 > bits, but most 9500s just went out the door with 128 bit memory. I > remember at one point in time trying out a hack to the 9500 driver that > enabled the 256 bit bus to see if I had a rebadged 9700, and had similar > artifacts. > > So I decided to peruse my X logs, and sure enough I see: > (--) RADEON(0): Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (256 bit DDR SDRAM) > > Is it possible that the radeon driver is using the 256 bus? Is there a > way to force it to use a 128 bit bus? Has anyone else seen this? > > Thanks, > Reid On further investigation, I tried forcing the driver to switch to a 128 bit bus by setting the R300_MEM_NUM_CHANNELS_MASK bits on RADEON_MEM_CNTL to 0x1, but the problem did not go away. I'll try describing it a little better.. only with gl acceleration, the entire gl context appears to have criss-crossing lines 4 pixels wide that are randomly filled correctly or black, so that they form roughly a chain link fence pattern of trash on the gl context. Anyone have an idea? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 22:02:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0981D1065670 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from csmtp3.b-one.net (csmtp3.one.com [195.47.247.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37B88FC15 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd.luigi@alshome.be) Received: from [192.168.1.46] (unknown [91.86.82.223]) by csmtp3.b-one.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3692100C637; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:02:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47D9A459.4080306@alshome.be> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:02:01 +0100 From: Luigi User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Moore , freebsd-questions References: <47D80406.3060408@gmail.com> <47D80E3A.9080706@pcbsd.com> In-Reply-To: <47D80E3A.9080706@pcbsd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Superuser password lost [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bsd.luigi@alshome.be List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:02:04 -0000 Ok thank you very much it works Luigi Kris Moore a crit : > > Luigi, > > Normally you can't just "look-up" the password, however you can reset > it if you like. To reset, use this procedure: > > 1. Boot the system > 2. At the splash loader screen, choose option "4" single user mode > 3. When it drops you to a boot prompt, hit enter, then type in: > # mount -o rw / > 4. Next enter the password change command: > # passwd > 5. Change your password, and then type: > # exit > > That should be it! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 22:16:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90241106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630E08FC17 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:16:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+T7=60d89361@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FE7D05B5 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:16:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:16:33 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080313221633.6b80ecbc@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200803132214.49024.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> <90A25985-F5A0-49D9-86A2-5479892DD3EF@mac.com> <200803132214.49024.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:16:38 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:14:48 +0100 Mel wrote: > On Thursday 13 March 2008 21:49:11 Chuck Swiger wrote: > > Your kernel tree is huge-- on a 6.x system, that's normally around > > 25MB. > > Yeah, but that went up with 7. Majorly. > here's one from a 7.x kernel, generic, but with ULE instead of 4BSD: > > # du -sh /boot/kernel > 113M /boot/kernel My 7.0 kernel $ du -hd0 /boot/kernel 32M /boot/kernel I have DEBUG=-g commented out, perhaps it's just the symbols. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 22:28:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FEF106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268E28FC1E for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2DMSOBn031825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:28:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:28:22 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Using Install CD To Prepare Hard Disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:28:30 -0000 I would like to use the CD install menus to only prepare the hard disk (Partition, Label, Format) without actually installing anything on the drive. Can this be done? There seems to be no "None" option for Distributions, and I cannot find the right magic to make the installer go ahead and prepare the drive w/o resorting to at least a minimal install. I assume if the answer is "no" then that means this has to be done manually from the fixit command line???? Thanks, -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 22:33:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7520106566C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler_t_granger@yahoo.com) Received: from web39507.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web39507.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.106.91]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B11B8FC36 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tyler_t_granger@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 78271 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Mar 2008 22:06:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=efuqtWLZLWav620fvRK2yM31+LjYEZ45jdE39/KakEhsAQUn+ubfbXd4AaW2grF0yLIa8RtPJP8wqyOo6r3CdITuvs6jjeXnEYZBNEmcPJOMID8iQpUs+RekbK1+4SRbcPI6Oo0Es9m+y6jhmEKD3h+eSxY574kcDqzIWSTELfU=; X-YMail-OSG: usf8UoYVM1kXn5kcFa3fR0RdOmf606LqjpsIegWVhnOV_ounKmHp_QDFvTmQJ.Y2yMoBnj3JvA-- Received: from [69.151.186.2] by web39507.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:06:20 PDT Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:06:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Tyler Granger To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <22225.78192.qm@web39507.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Installing from hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:33:01 -0000 OK, I have all the CDs on my computer in the d:\freebsd\ folder. I did not just copy the cds but put the contents of each cd in that folder... So, just one folder of all the freebsd files. I have one floppy disk... So I booted over time to get to the installer.. I would like to know what I need to do to install freebsd to my C:\ drive. The C & D drives are on the same hard disk. ????? The installer can't seem to find the files on the d:\ partition. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 22:44:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D1E1065674 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866838FC1C for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29D75E1B; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:44:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHYjEkvLhJeX; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:44:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.214.13.96]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC7555E05; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:44:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <2FB616F9-6AA7-4BE5-A5A4-01207D34DA9C@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: tundra@tundraware.com In-Reply-To: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:44:17 -0700 References: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Using Install CD To Prepare Hard Disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:44:22 -0000 On Mar 13, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I would like to use the CD install menus to only prepare the hard > disk (Partition, Label, Format) without actually installing anything > on > the drive. Can this be done? There should be a "(W)rite" option on the various pages which let you at least partition the drive without installing the software. > There seems to be no "None" option for > Distributions, and I cannot find the right magic to make the installer > go ahead and prepare the drive w/o resorting to at least a minimal > install. On the other hand, it would be perfectly reasonable to attach a new drive to a working system and run the fdisk and newfs commands by hand from the CLI or sysinstall, if you prefer doing it that way... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 13 22:49:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D931065672 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A818FC28 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2DMng1m082457 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:49:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <47D9AF85.5010909@tundraware.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:49:41 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> <2FB616F9-6AA7-4BE5-A5A4-01207D34DA9C@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <2FB616F9-6AA7-4BE5-A5A4-01207D34DA9C@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: Using Install CD To Prepare Hard Disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:49:47 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Mar 13, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> I would like to use the CD install menus to only prepare the hard >> disk (Partition, Label, Format) without actually installing anything on >> the drive. Can this be done? > > There should be a "(W)rite" option on the various pages which let you at > least partition the drive without installing the software. Yup that was the magic - I missed it entirely. The option appears in the label editor menu... Thanks! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 00:43:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23EE106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEE88FC13 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560C3130DDA for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:43:33 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id q-qidK0R08O2 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:43:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E7B80130DD8 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:43:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:43:28 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Message-ID: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL" Content-Disposition: inline X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:43:37 -0000 --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP" Content-Disposition: inline --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I have a server at home, I use it as a mail server, as well as P2P instead of running P2P on my Laptop, I run it on the server and I just use clients to control it... Anyway, I switched from Gentoo to FreeBSD like a month ago, I'm quite happy with it, very stable very reliable, but I'm having trouble installing azureus. Since it's a server, that doesn't even have a monitor attached to it, I have no use for any X11 dependencies, so I've added to make.conf --------CUT WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes --------CUT Now when I try to install azureus it pulls a huge number of X11 libraries, which I'm sure I won't be needing with this headless setup, anyway to get rid of them ?? Attached the output of "portmaster --show-work net-p2p/azureus" Thank you. --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="azureus-dependencies.txt" ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/net-p2p/azureus ===>>> Starting check for all dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency list for net-p2p/azureus from ports ===>>> NOT INSTALLED accessibility/atk ===>>> Installed archivers/unzip ===>>> NOT INSTALLED archivers/zip ===>>> Installed converters/libiconv ===>>> NOT INSTALLED devel/apache-ant ===>>> Installed devel/gettext ===>>> Installed devel/glib20 ===>>> Installed devel/gmake ===>>> Installed devel/icu ===>>> Installed devel/libtool15 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED devel/log4j ===>>> Installed devel/m4 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED devel/makedepend ===>>> Installed devel/pcre ===>>> Installed devel/pkg-config ===>>> NOT INSTALLED graphics/cairo ===>>> Installed graphics/jpeg ===>>> NOT INSTALLED graphics/libGL ===>>> NOT INSTALLED graphics/libGLU ===>>> NOT INSTALLED graphics/libdrm ===>>> Installed graphics/png ===>>> Installed graphics/tiff ===>>> NOT INSTALLED java/diablo-jdk15 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED java/jakarta-commons-cli ===>>> NOT INSTALLED java/jakarta-commons-lang ===>>> NOT INSTALLED java/javavmwrapper ===>>> NOT INSTALLED java/jdk15 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED java/junit ===>>> Installed lang/perl5.8 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED misc/compat6x ===>>> NOT INSTALLED misc/hicolor-icon-theme ===>>> NOT INSTALLED misc/shared-mime-info ===>>> Installed print/freetype2 ===>>> Installed textproc/expat2 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED textproc/intltool ===>>> Installed textproc/libxml2 ===>>> Installed textproc/p5-XML-Parser ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/bdftopcf ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/bitstream-vera ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/encodings ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/font-bh-ttf ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/font-misc-ethiopic ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/font-misc-meltho ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/font-util ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/fontcacheproto ===>>> Installed x11-fonts/fontconfig ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/fontsproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/libFS ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/libXfont ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/libXfontcache ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/libXft ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/libfontenc ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/mkfontdir ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/mkfontscale ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/xf86bigfontproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-fonts/xorg-fonts-truetype ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/gtk20 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/libXaw ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/libXmu ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/libXt ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/open-motif ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/pango ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11-toolkits/swt-devel ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/bigreqsproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/compositeproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/damageproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/dmxproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/evieext ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/fixesproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/glproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/inputproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/kbproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libICE ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libSM ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libX11 ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXScrnSaver ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXTrap ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXau ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXcomposite ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXcursor ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXdamage ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXdmcp ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXevie ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXext ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXfixes ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXi ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXinerama ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXp ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXpm ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXprintAppUtil ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXprintUtil ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXrandr ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXrender ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXres ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXtst ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXv ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXvMC ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXxf86dga ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXxf86misc ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libXxf86vm ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libdmx ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/liboldX ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libxkbfile ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/libxkbui ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/printproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/randrproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/recordproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/renderproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/resourceproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/scrnsaverproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/trapproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/videoproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xbitmaps ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xcmiscproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xextproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xf86dgaproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xf86miscproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xf86vidmodeproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xineramaproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xproto ===>>> NOT INSTALLED x11/xtrans --KFztAG8eRSV9hGtP-- --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2cowVWU5RcjdGKIRAicWAJ9hV07r2lDB4ts0BASNLHIM09cGjgCeJdjR 8dmTHeQb+ilQLXnIJcFOJMA= =L+cA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 01:08:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724D51065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9978FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:08:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471931CD18; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:08:46 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:08:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> In-Reply-To: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803140208.44527.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:08:49 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 01:43:28 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > Anyway, I switched from Gentoo to FreeBSD like a month ago, I'm quite > happy with it, very stable very reliable, but I'm having trouble > installing azureus. Since it's a server, that doesn't even have a > monitor attached to it, I have no use for any X11 dependencies, so > I've added to make.conf > > --------CUT > WITHOUT_X11=yes > --------CUT Unfortunately, that switch isn't working as "I don't want anything pulled in that uses X11", but rather as "If this port can be built without X11, then I will obey that, otherwise I will go ahead and install X11". Maybe that's a project for next google's summer of code. Anyway, the port depends on x11-toolkits/swt, which is what pulls in X. If you know that azareus can be built without X, you could request support for it through the send-pr(1) mechanism, but it doesn't look like that'd be an easy job. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 01:24:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B86106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from js.lists@gmail.com) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648B18FC16 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:24:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from js.lists@gmail.com) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so6080698agc.3 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=Ia0UIFfRtkVZUBDIsSq4h+KemvgKaBSe0JL8Db6vO3s=; b=IwNiYgv4hLOy5g0AW5njEeWrAOYzqMxJwdGCWo+O/C/9yF3sobqGfnAj3JiUFb+7yuzZzAG6xwTdEaI4/nuJ0QG3o6zLhdNtGdejkZtiPrYghpyRC/nlDVhnwc90LFYAl7LxuZJYSGcXsCESqawYqgI2lnxIiasPLQ8NcuVFWbc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer; b=YRuOaSLypOkxo5gAKRDJcDBN8+ft8W+WjbjkpqRk8OH5yFIzD4si4pZyoHKvhXr1T1fvQ2Be3ioJ/jnKyggfUE+BvlMexTI05kCfKp8f1v32vKwt3s6/NnSO9pfgDG/SpU0bpqbaBbN3VrE7ustsDmO1yc5KxXkYCDOWsOI3ZEo= Received: by 10.100.137.11 with SMTP id k11mr21313703and.38.1205457875134; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whost10.stevensen.net ( [76.103.60.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s30sm25146204elf.17.2008.03.13.18.24.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <54BB987B-1EE5-40ED-8D13-FF51410FE444@gmail.com> From: Joe To: Jeffrey Smith In-Reply-To: <1205013053.44649.14.camel@mrwizard.futurecis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:24:31 -0700 References: <1205013053.44649.14.camel@mrwizard.futurecis.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS (not sure if this is the place) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:24:36 -0000 This is interesting, especially because I was going to build a 64 bit system for my next storage server. Search through zfs-discuss on opensolaris.org. If you don't find anything, post a message. Sun engineers frequent that list. Be sure to make it clear that you are using FreeBSD 7.0 which I believe is ZFS v5. On Mar 8, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Jeffrey Smith wrote: > I get this on reboot of my system > > # zpool status > pool: pool > state: UNAVAIL > status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are > insufficient > replicas for the pool to continue functioning. > action: Attach the missing device and online it using 'zpool online'. > see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-D3 > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > pool UNAVAIL 0 0 0 insufficient replicas > da0s2 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open > > An import and export fixes this > > # zpool export pool > # zpool import pool > # zpool status > pool: pool > state: ONLINE > scrub: none requested > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > pool ONLINE 0 0 0 > da0s2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > # uname -a > FreeBSD xxx.futurecis.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Sun > Feb 24 > 10:35:36 UTC 2008 > root@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > I have another system running the i386 version of 7.0 and am not > having > this issue. Is this a bug in the 64 bit version, and I was not sure > if > this was the place for this post but I didn't see a dedicated ZFS > list. > Any help will be much appreciated. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 01:29:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A329C106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8F38FC1F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so4195773wxd.7 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=i97D6ZVzlR4/iqc5CYw1CgOzJGAtAht/roE72BAf4rA=; b=LXBV4stPIA19GunAdTQujqKWReMuaAH6UTTwZzZnPE2SRnnMZ8dLVLOD3wf4VEn18+1fUplLW2QMCJAGRDzi81oUxzSN6cQ3krO6Ng8qMhGo773BaIRmJtDVTxQk9PNS2qV0bMpthCp1aNLWdj6rQkNEbVUBcMQWA2BxwSpsno4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dNqytHRlcmWgSJCAxGCd+OxAeYUgShYv8C2VUxA2H4NmXBnZOPpbtL6BXvEoxF6ZdyAAu1wMjslRug3ukvYchdTZDO712PC/XPgZfSv3wAR5r/1/2k4CdobqAQ7O6zuCPIDGxCnwAWbQINIsFysh7NidOfWNXzu1fJ2iEAoaJjI= Received: by 10.70.48.1 with SMTP id v1mr11302912wxv.64.1205458195165; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.70.2 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:29:55 -0600 From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: /usr/local/www a tradition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:29:56 -0000 Is there a compelling reason for placing subversion and web-server data in /usr/local and not somewhere else? I was thinking of keeping all user accounts (human and daemon alike) in one place like, /home/www and /home/svn and so forth. Before I break convention, I just thought I'd see if placing said files in /usr/local was just a tradition or if there was another reason for it. Thanks. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 01:46:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D63F1065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133BD8FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so4202389wxd.7 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:46:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GxhJC+BXvTuG0E0FHhrjZWy6bRM+8Ct6xCFo/w+bh5Q=; b=nGuWzpVYezs6tufGoeQUa/gTZ61A3YlF+3B8hlGqa9cAhZ7e/S2K6YMofx9aJuClTbLYe/MJitdta1Y7OjO71FY1U0s616mn6Xxshv5Rsu/8lUYNjfChDoPgd6PZxyNqwsEFNAiCM2a4a2mzn3cvw/BZO9S4rN7GmcQUyGqVEqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dHD/35ufeDvNcLrc2chEr/Hz3y0QQHys5yAj72b3tSbF+voQ82S5uwrIRV9rl3LbeOnfI3XTm5NJujfu0b928Zyy0gzZMd9QVaWLPgGMGKn617ZJfmnQ8DC/n4jAbX7uzMATuDT6xZPFlssjgeipbgwHBrcBkMD00NZ490CkDCg= Received: by 10.70.113.5 with SMTP id l5mr11353688wxc.31.1205459185007; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.70.2 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660803131846y7e357373v73e0b86d0edae0c5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:46:24 -0600 From: Modulok To: "Mark Busby" In-Reply-To: <347572.54335.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <347572.54335.qm@web81208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: help help Subject: Re: Tyan Motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:46:26 -0000 On 3/11/08, Mark Busby wrote: > Looking to build a new server, looking for a dual amd 940 board with sata II > support. > I have googled, but still looking for a firm success before spending the > money. > > Anyone have success with this Tyan board. > Model S2892GNR > North Bridge AMD 8131, South Bridge Nvidia nForce Prof. 2200 > Other chipset Winbond W83627HF Super I/O ASIC I'm can't say one way or another for the specific board you're looking at, but for what it's worth, I have two Tomcats (S2866A2NRF) and haven't had any problems with them. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 01:58:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D72106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F86A8FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EE2130DC9 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:58:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aKS7UgHuE2OS for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:58:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DB53130DC7 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:58:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:58:08 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314015808.GC28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <200803140208.44527.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803140208.44527.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:58:16 -0000 --wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said= , On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:08:43AM +0100: > On Friday 14 March 2008 01:43:28 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > > Anyway, I switched from Gentoo to FreeBSD like a month ago, I'm quite > > happy with it, very stable very reliable, but I'm having trouble > > installing azureus. Since it's a server, that doesn't even have a > > monitor attached to it, I have no use for any X11 dependencies, so > > I've added to make.conf > > --------CUT > > WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes > > --------CUT > Unfortunately, that switch isn't working as "I don't want anything pulled= in=20 > that uses X11", but rather as "If this port can be built without X11, the= n I=20 > will obey that, otherwise I will go ahead and install X11". > Maybe that's a project for next google's summer of code. > Anyway, the port depends on x11-toolkits/swt, which is what pulls in X. I= f you=20 > know that azareus can be built without X, you could request support for i= t=20 > through the send-pr(1) mechanism, but it doesn't look like that'd be an e= asy=20 > job. Oh that's too bad :S since I need it, I'll just install it with the X dependencies... Thanks anyway, I appreciate your help :) --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2duwVWU5RcjdGKIRAuC5AKCHdB72ARiJeVQgk+MHWkwqNvRMygCePdZM aBA2zRGvXwiyngWU8bzuKbs= =+iAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wTWi5aaYRw9ix9vO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 01:59:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D2D106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (freebsd.alaskaparadise.com [208.79.80.117]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3718C8FC2E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:59:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from 137-42-178-69.gci.net (137-42-178-69.gci.net [69.178.42.137]) by freebsd.alaskaparadise.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BE223836ED; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:59:53 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:59:45 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> X-Face: jC2w\k*Q1\0DA2Q0Eh&BrP/Rt2M,^2O#R07VoT98m*>miQF9%Bi9vy`F6cPjwEe?m,)=?utf-8?q?2=0A=09X=3FM=5C=3AOE9QgZ?="xT3/n3,3MJ7N=Cfkmi%f(w^~X"SUxn>; 27NO; C+)g[7J`$G*SN>{<=?utf-8?q?O=3Bg7=7C=0A=09o=7D=265A=5D4?=@7D`=Eb@Zs1Ln814?]|k@'bG=.Ca"[|8+_.OsNAo8!#?4u MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803131759.49498.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Modulok Subject: Re: /usr/local/www a tradition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Beech Rintoul List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:59:54 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008, Modulok said: > Is there a compelling reason for placing subversion and web-server > data in /usr/local and not somewhere else? I was thinking of > keeping all user accounts (human and daemon alike) in one place > like, /home/www and /home/svn and so forth. > > Before I break convention, I just thought I'd see if placing said > files in /usr/local was just a tradition or if there was another > reason for it. > > Thanks. > -Modulok- Actually you can put webdata anywhere you want. It's common for virtual host sites to be in ~/htdocs so the user has write access to their site. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://www.freebsd.org X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Latest Release: / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 02:25:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE598106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C7A8FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ejcerejo@optonline.net) Received: from localhost (ool-44c03822.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.56.34]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with SMTP id <0JXP003M182MVYA0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:25:29 -0400 From: "E. J. Cerejo" To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <20080313222529.d3d9d904.ejcerejo@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Cc: Subject: Noatun and Kaboodle Skips X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:25:43 -0000 I've just noticed that when I play mp3s with noatun and kaboodle the audio skips and plays too fast sometimes. It doesn't do it with audacious or vlc, a quick search on google tells me it has to do with a bug on aRts but the suggestions from those posts didn't work. Has anyone experienced this problem with these two apps? I'm on FBSD 7-stable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 02:38:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB641106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@serasera.org) Received: from serasera.org (sd-3398.dedibox.fr [88.191.25.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0EF8FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@serasera.org) Received: by serasera.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 655942CEA5A; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:36:51 +0100 (CET) To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Wells Fargo Message-Id: <1307463140.1439@wellsfargo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:36:51 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: EV SSL certification Online Banking update X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:38:09 -0000 Wells Fargo [1]Wells Fargo Home Page Online Banking Dear Wells Fargo Banking Customer, Due to the high number of fraud attempts and phishing scams, it has been decided to implement EV SSL Certification on this Internet Banking website. The use of EV SSL certification works with high security Web browsers to clearly identify whether the site belongs to the company or is another site imitating that company's site. It has been introduced to protect our clients against phishing and other online fraudulent activities. Since most Internet related crimes rely on false identity, Wells Fargo went through a rigorous validation process that meets the Extended Validation guidelines. Please update your account to the new EV SSL certification by [2]Clicking here. You are strictly advised to login into your Wells Fargo account using the above link. Your Wells Fargo account will automatically be added to our recent internet banking security system. (Failure to verify your account details correctly will lead to account suspension) Thank you. Account Sentinel Service Wells Fargo Online Customer Service: 1998 - 2008 (Do not reply to this email. Wells Fargo retains the right to send you periodic updates on alerts and services). References 1. https://www.wellsfargo.com/ 2. http://www.poducateme.com/forum/online.wellsfargo.com|login|EV%20SSL_UPDATE_CODE=ZXJyb3IuY3VzdG9tZXJOb3RNYXRjaGVk/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 02:48:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BC41065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544768FC16 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A0130DCC for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:48:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rtSbSqKmFTMS for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:48:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B7729130DCA for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:48:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:48:39 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314024839.GD28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <200803140208.44527.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080314015808.GC28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314015808.GC28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:48:50 -0000 --ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Wael Nasreddine said, On = Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:58:08AM +0100: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel sa= id, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:08:43AM +0100: > > On Friday 14 March 2008 01:43:28 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > > > Anyway, I switched from Gentoo to FreeBSD like a month ago, I'm quite > > > happy with it, very stable very reliable, but I'm having trouble > > > installing azureus. Since it's a server, that doesn't even have a > > > monitor attached to it, I have no use for any X11 dependencies, so > > > I've added to make.conf > > > --------CUT > > > WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes > > > --------CUT > > Unfortunately, that switch isn't working as "I don't want anything pull= ed in=20 > > that uses X11", but rather as "If this port can be built without X11, t= hen I=20 > > will obey that, otherwise I will go ahead and install X11". > > Maybe that's a project for next google's summer of code. > > Anyway, the port depends on x11-toolkits/swt, which is what pulls in X.= If you=20 > > know that azareus can be built without X, you could request support for= it=20 > > through the send-pr(1) mechanism, but it doesn't look like that'd be an= easy=20 > > job. > Oh that's too bad :S since I need it, I'll just install it with the X > dependencies... > Thanks anyway, I appreciate your help :) I'm having a problem compiling libXext, here's the log: --------CUT =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for libXext-1.0.3,1 =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for libXext-1.0.3,1 =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/lib/libXext-1.0.3.tar.bz2. =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/lib/libXext-1.0.3.tar.bz2. =3D=3D=3D> Patching for libXext-1.0.3,1 =3D=3D=3D> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/= xextproto.pc - found =3D=3D=3D> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/= xproto.pc - found =3D=3D=3D> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/= x11.pc - not found =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc in = /usr/ports/x11/libX11 =3D> No directory for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc. Skipping.. =3D=3D=3D> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/= xau.pc - found =3D=3D=3D> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found =3D=3D=3D> Configuring for libXext-1.0.3,1 configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g whe= el checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7.0 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7.0 checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables...=20 checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for ld used by cc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of c++... gcc3 checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... c++ -E checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-g77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-f77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-xlf... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-frt... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-pgf77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-cf77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-fort77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-fl32... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-af77... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-f90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-xlf90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-pgf90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-pghpf... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-epcf90... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-gfortran... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-g95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-f95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-fort... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-xlf95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-ifort... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-ifc... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-efc... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-pgf95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-lf95... no checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-ftn... no checking for g77... no checking for f77... no checking for xlf... no checking for frt... no checking for pgf77... no checking for cf77... no checking for fort77... no checking for fl32... no checking for af77... no checking for f90... no checking for xlf90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for pghpf... no checking for epcf90... no checking for gfortran... no checking for g95... no checking for f95... no checking for fort... no checking for xlf95... no checking for ifort... no checking for ifc... no checking for efc... no checking for pgf95... no checking for lf95... no checking for ftn... no checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from cc object... ok checking for objdir... .libs checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-ar... no checking for ar... ar checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-strip... no checking for strip... strip checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc static flag -static works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... y= es checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd7.0 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes configure: creating libtool appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool checking for ld used by c++... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... = yes checking for c++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if c++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if c++ static flag -static works... yes checking if c++ supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... = yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd7.0 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-gcc... (cached) cc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether cc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed checking dependency style of cc... (cached) gcc3 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7.0-pkg-config... no checking for pkg-config... /usr/local/bin/pkg-config checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes checking for XEXT... gnome-config: not found configure: error: Package requirements (xproto x11 xextproto xau) were not = met. Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively you may set the XEXT_CFLAGS and XEXT_LIBS environment variabl= es to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to x11@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/x11/libXext/work/libXext-1.0.3/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provi= de an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libXext. =3D=3D=3D>>> make failed for x11/libXext =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for /usr/ports/x11/libXext failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for /usr/ports/x11/libXi failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for /usr/ports/java/diablo-jdk15 failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for /usr/ports/java/jdk15 failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for /usr/ports/devel/apache-ant failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update --------CUT which package provides gnome-config ( pkg_info -W `which gnome-config` ) ?? Thanks --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2eeHVWU5RcjdGKIRAvLdAJ9N5MXXI889pTck+r2utnHX5iUUWgCdF/iP 7hKP9u1UN26fFP7qL7gNyJU= =laUu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ULyIDA2m8JTe+TiX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 02:56:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9761065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8CF8FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so4230554wxd.7 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:56:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=Jk+jmB/cwfuuiUmg402JkDJIo2OIyvkHmzVz7KKVR+8=; b=jHmwba/Mh3rUDaMd60oMdOgQQd14RR4noCEEipcdYV/zCLH9nrV9tu9Veq4u9AtTYSdye89hVYUZsugHXemq1F7QZkHcm/K5NHfHZRfxtm6kNiOu1KE7XX0bd/vUbP7eH0mUK1CCBzLjTYdWZogajW0p9vK7xtVUxbUTRCccpSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=N1gSZqkhPuu7PmiZRfoSfLdAT4sBXCif3X4E5XNtJIkeHJBull7bA4LIYKkQWOWubq3bRvsxMXljfn+87V/NpQOXkrc88Z2RBKaIYoNTzbHsfkpgecw6Zvg8zRYjnTAfB+P7D4/eLBoiD70KoB1WO7Y1UYEdsIzDDASFzgBQgDc= Received: by 10.70.75.12 with SMTP id x12mr11398385wxa.68.1205463365514; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:56:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.2? ( [24.229.62.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i40sm1268129wxd.9.2008.03.13.19.56.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:56:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:56:01 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803132256.01197.glen.j.barber@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: ndis0 no link on 6.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:56:07 -0000 Hello everyone. First off, sorry for the double post, but I'm not 100% certain at where this post belongs. I've found via Google many problems with ndis0 and failure to find a link in 6.3-RELEASE, without resolution. So here's my setup. I'm using a Broadcom 4318 chipset, with drivers created from ndisgen. If you need more specific information on the drivers, I'll be more than happy to provide information, however I believe it to be irrelevant at this moment, as I have used more than one driver version, with the same results. In 6.3-RC1 and below (tested in 6.2-RELEASE, and all -STABLE releases in between), my ndis0 adapter works as exptected, using WPA and DHCP. I can't pinpoint exaclty what changed (I've check in /usr/src/UPDATING, as it seemed to be most relevant), with no avail to finding anything regarding either wpa or dhclient. Since an upgrade to 6.3-RELEASE (both, via csup and a fresh install off of cd), I generate my ndis module, create an /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf, leaving /etc/dhclient as default, and am prompted with: ndis0: no link.......... giving up Upon 'kldunload bcmwl5.ko; kldload bcmwl5.ko', my ndis0 card looses all WPA capabilities. What seems to me to be the interesting part is this: If I 'csup' to 6.3-RELEASE from -RC1, and build a kernel, the problem does not occur -- as long as I do not 'buildworld'. However, once I 'buildworld; installworld', I am faced with the same problems as if I had installed 6.3-RELEASE from cd. I would really like to figure out what is causing this (both for myself, and the other affected ndis0 victims), but I'm not sure where to look -- dhclient, wpa_supplicant or ndis itself. Any other information I could provide, please let me know. Thanks. -- Glen Barber (570)328-0318 http://www.dev-urandom.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 03:40:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AE91065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617868FC1B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ja0lz-0006NS-JN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:39:59 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:39:59 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:39:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:39:51 +0100 Lines: 9 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Sender: news Subject: pkg_list mypackage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:40:02 -0000 Hello The online FreeBSD manual in the "4.4 Using the Packages System" part doesn't mention a command to list the files that were installed through a package. What is the equivalent of eg. "pkg_list mypackage"? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 03:57:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2241065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131158FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so5457422pyb.10 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:57:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8Ufa3gMjhUzSA5wXjgzx1TC7SNYHGLNCZ0iTwcHiZ3E=; b=LxLCkodjI4DlSl4N2Yl4bFknKsI/4iKNAHbnY4ZZuSs+FbUu8hBiaExQ29ld/vTJs4KO/Z2RMbb4z8OzNia3nrc8oPnMEKQL2yyqwwF3UvpB0ObK10epGWwgUO8fOxpgvEOPbxsMKaXaWbVwBe0oVNTTvKTEtFy9/TQdXTO16rw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rNf2gx7R4LAiz+vT9SC4NdCrlOSD6+29vI9euLMD+kAKSxt4de6o5sHUP/pLqAkByvHD76ri8s9gX3ihLI1sTD9hpU8RmEBX6M1RdOkHDfMuGY3TlGaoZ1ijDnBZN/JBzp88piZHytKDqQMSxmJVf9l34nJIJdNYw/nzG5c62wI= Received: by 10.35.63.2 with SMTP id q2mr17253832pyk.50.1205467048000; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:57:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.9.6 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0803132057j78d44c87y2cb246a1785f469f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:57:27 -0400 From: "Josh Carroll" To: Gilles In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_list mypackage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:57:29 -0000 > The online FreeBSD manual in the "4.4 Using the Packages System" part > doesn't mention a command to list the files that were installed > through a package. > > What is the equivalent of eg. "pkg_list mypackage"? Have a look at the pkg_info man page. The option you're looking for is -L. Regards, Josh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 03:59:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A4A1065679 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: from rly-ip02.mx.aol.com (rly-ip02.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA018FC21 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: from smtp-los01.proxy.aol.com (smtp-los01.proxy.aol.com [195.93.24.40]) by rly-ip02.mx.aol.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2E3xAmB001738; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:59:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (AC8DAEEF.ipt.aol.com [172.141.174.239]) by smtp-los01.proxy.aol.com (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m2E3x4wC005584; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:59:08 -0400 Message-ID: <47D9F7E2.5010509@paraklet.net> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:58:26 +0000 From: tomasz dereszynski User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071216) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gilles References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_list mypackage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:59:18 -0000 Gilles wrote: > Hello > > The online FreeBSD manual in the "4.4 Using the Packages System" part > doesn't mention a command to list the files that were installed > through a package. > > What is the equivalent of eg. "pkg_list mypackage"? > > Thank you. > > man pkg_info -L Show the files within each package. This is different from just viewing the packing list, since full pathnames for everything are generated. like pkg_info -L horde-base-3.1.6 Information for horde-base-3.1.6: Files: /usr/local/www/horde/admin/cmdshell.php /usr/local/www/horde/admin/datatree.php /usr/local/www/horde/admin/groups.php /usr/local/www/horde/admin/index.php /usr/local/www/horde/admin/locale/en_US/help.xml .... -- bEsT rEgArDs | "Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem." -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo | "In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different." -- Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 04:11:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417C8106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidrjr@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4378FC1B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidrjr@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0pJu1Z02z0Fqzac5105a00; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:54:24 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([67.184.16.41]) by OMTA08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 0ruj1Z00B0t9eDP3U00000; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:54:57 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=pTCxJec4Fzm8sMjlOlsA:9 a=oIpLoshtNtDOWHOoEvsA:7 a=GS8qkErxRddpe9a5xBA2U5mNbIAA:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=eAqnhAZOXd8A:10 Message-ID: <47DA04F1.6020004@comcast.net> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:54:09 -0600 From: David Reedy Jr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gilles References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_list mypackage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:11:02 -0000 Gilles wrote: > Hello > > The online FreeBSD manual in the "4.4 Using the Packages System" part > doesn't mention a command to list the files that were installed > through a package. > pkg_info -L pkg-name > What is the equivalent of eg. "pkg_list mypackage"? > > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 04:38:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAAA106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@twisted.net) Received: from oz.twisted.net (oz.twisted.net [69.211.34.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A168FC28 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:38:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from troy@twisted.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oz.twisted.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D1CFC49CB for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:22:50 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at twisted.net Received: from oz.twisted.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (oz.twisted.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0d5C9eVyzTmX for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:22:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: by oz.twisted.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7264AFC49AA; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:22:49 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:22:48 -0500 From: Troy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314042248.GA47391@twisted.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Vim insert mode requires 'i' three times X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: troy@twisted.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:38:54 -0000 I'm not sure if anyone has seen this but it started a few months ago. When I startup vim I have to hit 'i' three times to get it to go into insert mode. I started troubleshooting my .vimrc file and figured out that as long as I have a .vimrc file, even if it's completely blank it exhibits this behavior. I notice that there is a 'c' letter in the buffer upon startup but again there is nothing that is in the .vimrc file that is causing this to load. If I delete the .vimrc file and start the program, I can hit 'i' once and it will go into insert mode like it's supposed to. I have had this problem on 6.3 and just upgraded to 7.0 and it still is there. This is happening on two different FreeBSD machines. One machine is running: vim+ruby-7.1.242_5 vim-lite-7.1.242 Anyone have any idea why this is happening? -Troy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 04:56:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F376106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD928FC17 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([71.79.250.82]) by hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080314045612.CNEH18091.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:56:12 +0000 Message-ID: <000b01c8858f$9aee86c0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:55:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: safesquid on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:56:13 -0000 Hello, Is anyone using safesquid from www.safesquid.com on FreeBSD? I read there was a patch for it for 5.3, but didn't see anything for 6 or 7, so was curious. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 05:07:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA591065676 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout1.easydns.com [205.210.42.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D1C8FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:07:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C6A48393 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:07:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id D032EB658F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:07:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:07:27 +0000 References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803140507.29658.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:07:46 -0000 On Wednesday 12 March 2008 19:37:47 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Gligor Lucian wrote: > >> David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: > >>>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? > >>> > >>> Yes. > > > > You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I > > can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on > > FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other > > systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also tried > > HP officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work > > with cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, > > but either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but > > nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. > > > > Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear > > about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. > > > >> Thank you very much for your answer. > >> All the best, Gligor Lucian. > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------- > >> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! > >> Search. _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I have cups working on my system, printing on locally attached USB > printers. I have followed the instructions in dekstopBSD wiki: > > http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing > > (though I used ports and not packages) Did you find it necessary to recompile the kernel with ulpt disabled? I have a HP PSC2110 "All-In-One" that I can use in Linux (printing and scanning) but was unable to get working in FreeBSD. I believe part of the solution is to disable ulpt and recompile the kernel, but I had trouble getting hplip to work. FreeBSD does not have hpoj, which is what I use in Linux with this printer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 05:13:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1B3106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290098FC20 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (athedsl-07801.home.otenet.gr [87.202.30.181]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m2E5DWWi001280; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:13:32 +0200 Message-ID: <47DA097F.1040705@otenet.gr> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:13:35 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pollywog References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> <200803140507.29658.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> In-Reply-To: <200803140507.29658.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:13:35 -0000 Pollywog wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 19:37:47 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> >> I have cups working on my system, printing on locally attached USB >> printers. I have followed the instructions in dekstopBSD wiki: >> >> http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing >> >> (though I used ports and not packages) >> > > Did you find it necessary to recompile the kernel with ulpt disabled? > > I have a HP PSC2110 "All-In-One" that I can use in Linux (printing and > scanning) but was unable to get working in FreeBSD. I believe part of the > solution is to disable ulpt and recompile the kernel, but I had trouble > getting hplip to work. FreeBSD does not have hpoj, which is what I use in > Linux with this printer. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > No, I haven't touched ulpt support in the kernel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 05:47:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7991065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:47:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Gene@Bomgardner.net) Received: from brightstar.bomgardner.net (brightstar.bomgardner.net [209.240.79.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406628FC20 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:47:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Gene@Bomgardner.net) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [192.168.0.2]) by brightstar.bomgardner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8941D119DE9 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:29:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.5.518 [269.21.7/1327]); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:29:31 -0500 Message-ID: <47DA0D3A.7060505@Bomgardner.net> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:29:30 -0500 From: Gene Bomgardner User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Getting .info messages on console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:47:54 -0000 Hi all, I'm running postfix with postgrey on FreeBSD 7.x. For some reason, postgrey is sending info messages such as acxtion=greylist, reason=new, client=xxxxxx, sender=yyyy, ... I've looked in syslog.conf and the postgrey docs without any success. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Gene -- Certified Virus Free (within AVG limits) Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.518 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1327 - Release Date: 3/12/2008 1:27 PM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 05:54:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29FFC1065674 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8AB8FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ja2rv-0002rf-SG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:15 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:15 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:15 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:54:00 +0100 Lines: 5 Message-ID: References: <47DA04F1.6020004@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 Sender: news Subject: Re: pkg_list mypackage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:54:18 -0000 On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:54:09 -0600, David Reedy Jr wrote: >pkg_info -L pkg-name Thanks guys. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 05:57:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F05B106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from ns.mahan.org (ns.mahan.org [67.116.10.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658B28FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Received: from widowmaker.local (crowTrobot [67.116.10.140]) by ns.mahan.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2E5vNYb075290; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:57:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mahan@mahan.org) Message-ID: <47DA13AF.5090804@mahan.org> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:57:03 -0700 From: Patrick Mahan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Falanga References: <340a29540803130910l2a5badacxe50cd81ace87e1f7@mail.gmail.com> <47D9682B.5060402@mahan.org> <340a29540803131111g20315740n629ee146bc2f8602@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <340a29540803131111g20315740n629ee146bc2f8602@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Network programming question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:57:04 -0000 Andrew Falanga presented these words - circa 3/13/08 11:11 AM-> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Patrick Mahan wrote: >> >> Andrew Falanga presented these words - circa 3/13/08 9:10 AM-> >> >>> Hi, >> See man inet_pton . . . for details. >> >> Briefly, inet_pton() doesn't understand sockaddr structures. Instead, >> it only understands in_addr or in6_addr structures which are included >> inside the sockaddr structure. So your above example should be changed >> to >> > > Ok, I should have thought of that when reading the manual. > >> if ((res = inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.1", &sa.sin_addr)) < 0) >> perror("inet_pton"); >> >> >> Because it is treating the sockaddr_in structure as an in_addr structure >> which is clobbering the sin_family field. >> > > If this is true, then why are my packets sent at all? The definition > of sockaddr_in (from /usr/include/netinet/in.h): > > struct sockaddr_in { > uint8_t sin_len; > sa_family_t sin_family; > in_port_t sin_port; > struct in_addr sin_addr; > char sin_zero[8]; > }; > > > The definition of in_addr (from /usr/include/netinet/in.h): > > struct in_addr { > in_addr_t s_addr; > }; > > The definition of in_addr_t (from /usr/include/netinet/in.h): > typedef uint32_t in_addr_t; > > Passing in what I have, the address should indeed (as you've pointed > out) clobber the sin_family member. However, since in_addr is > basically an unsigned integer, i.e. 4 bytes wide, shouldn't > inet_pton(3) clobber sin_len, sin_family & sin_port before ever > reaching sin_addr? The sin_len & sin_family are 8 bit quantities, the > sin_port is 16 bits, that's 32. If inet_pton(3) is expecting only an > in_addr I would think that a call to sendto(2) would fail because the > address in sin_addr is not filled, correct? inet_pton() clobbered the fields you pointed out. In fact the sin_family field was being set to 0x01 which caused your initial EADDRNOTSUPPORT error you were seeing. You quick change fixed that problem. However, (depending on how sockaddr_in structure is actually allocated) the sin_addr field was 0.0.0.0. This is actually an accepted form of the broadcast address for UDP packets. I forget exactly who the culprit was (Sun comes to mind) but there was a need to allow broadcasts to 0.0.0.0 (which is also know as INADDR_ANY). So, therefore, sendto() succeeded, just not in the way you expected. Looking at in_pcbconnect_setup() in the kernel shows that actually the packet is sent to the local primary interface address. Let's look at what really happen to that packet - "192.168.0.1" after being mangled by inet_pton() gives the field sin_addr.s_addr of 0x0100A8C0. This should make your sockaddr_in structure look like - sa.sin_len = 0x01 sa.sin_family = 0x00 sa.sin_port = 0xA8C0 (which is port 49320) sa.sin_addr.s_addr = 0x00000000 So the sendto() call was sending a packet to your local interface for port 49320. And since UDP is a connectionless protocol, you don't have a way (unless it is builtin to your application protocol) to determine an error. For example, TFTP sends back notification for every dgram received. I hope this helps with your understanding. I highly recommend if you are going to do more network programming that you obtain at least some books on the subject. Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 06:54:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B591065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712548FC16 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2E6sgxT002357 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:54:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <47DA2131.9030006@tundraware.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:54:41 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: 6.3 And VIA 8237S Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:54:49 -0000 I just bought a new MSI P4M900M2 mobo. It works just fine with both Windoze and SUSE Linux. When I tried booting 6.2 on it, it refused to set the drive (ad0 - I tried several different drives) into the higher speed UDMA modes. So, I downloaded 6.3, and it *seemed* to be fine. The drives come up as UDMA 100 or UDMA 133. But ... under long disk operations - say untaring a 2G tarball stored on a USB drive - I start to see this: ad0: WARNING WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC ERROR And eventually: ad0: FAILURE WRITE_DMA Status=51 .... Error=84 g_vfs_done():ad0s1f ... What's going on here? Is there a known driver problem with the VIA chipsets? I took the two drives I tried this with, and stuck them in another machine - no problem, so I kind of doubt this is a drive problem. I have replaced the IDE cables as well. Again, this same mobo and drive combo worked flawlessly doing the same thing under SUSE Linux, so I'm thinking this is a software problem. Any help much appreciated... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 06:57:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF61C106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5258FC1F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja3ql-0001bn-OJ for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:57:08 -0700 Received: from 71-220-166-120.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.166.120] helo=.domain.actdsltmp) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja3ql-0001bb-Ep; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:57:07 -0700 Message-ID: <47DA21C0.2030403@math.arizona.edu> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:57:04 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070916) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org, Pollywog References: <212181.35000.qm@web43142.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <47D82B8C.1060402@chuckr.org> <47D8310B.2010501@otenet.gr> <200803140507.29658.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> In-Reply-To: <200803140507.29658.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ACL-Warn: The HELO/EHLO greeting .domain.actdsltmp is invalid X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Cc: Subject: Re: USB printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:57:09 -0000 Pollywog wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2008 19:37:47 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> Chuck Robey wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Gligor Lucian wrote: >>> >>>> David Kelly wrote: >On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at >>>> > 12:59:38PM -0700, Gligor Lucian >wrote: > >>>>>> Does FreeBSD support a USB printer? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> >>> You know, while there are printing utils that actually work on FreeBSD, I >>> can't personally recommend CUPS. I keep on trying to get it to work on >>> FreeBSD efvery year or so, then I need to go over to one of my other >>> systems. Last one I tried was an Epson Stylus C84, but I've also tried >>> HP officejets, and I just can't get locally attached printers to work >>> with cups. I can get them to work with things like apsfilter very well, >>> but either someone is going to have to fix the Cups port (it builds, but >>> nothing locally runs) or stop recommending it. >>> >>> Or, does anyone else have it working on FreeBSD? Sure would like to hear >>> about it, but I've been trying for a long time now, with no success. >>> >>> >>>> Thank you very much for your answer. >>>> All the best, Gligor Lucian. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------- >>>> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! >>>> Search. _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> I have cups working on my system, printing on locally attached USB >> printers. I have followed the instructions in dekstopBSD wiki: >> >> http://desktopbsd.net/wiki/doku.php?id=doc:printing >> >> (though I used ports and not packages) >> > > Did you find it necessary to recompile the kernel with ulpt disabled? > > I have a HP PSC2110 "All-In-One" To get HP PSC2110 just working you can use HPIJS driver and you do not need to recompile the kernel. However if you want to use HPLIP to unlock full functionality (scanner and FAX, PC-copping) you will have to recompile the driver to disable ulpt driver since it is unable to get the vendor name and product ID. That is well-documented. You will probably also need to disable umass driver since it gets attached to printer before the ugen driver. In all honestly that is not well-documented. You will also need to start HPLIP daemons before the CUPS daemon. That is all well-documented. #enable CUPS and related lpd_enable="NO" hpiod_enable="YES" #daemons for HPLIP HP printing hpssd_enable="YES" #daemons for HPLIP HP printing cupsd_enable="YES" umess driver is needed for Floppy and Flash drives so you might want to load manually after the boot and after you unlock your printer. Cheers, Predrag > that I can use in Linux (printing and > scanning) but was unable to get working in FreeBSD. I believe part of the > solution is to disable ulpt and recompile the kernel, but I had trouble > getting hplip to work. FreeBSD does not have hpoj, which is what I use in > Linux with this printer. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 06:59:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE881065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:59:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDDB8FC13 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2E6xouU002551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:59:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <47DA2265.9080308@tundraware.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:59:49 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <47DA2131.9030006@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <47DA2131.9030006@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: 6.3 And VIA 8237S Controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:59:58 -0000 Tim Daneliuk wrote: One point of clarification I neglected to mention in the description below. I have not actually installed FreeBSD on the disk. I paritioned/labeled the disk with the install disk, then rebooted the install disk, went into the Fixit environment and manually mounted ad0x under the various /mnt directories. I then insert the USB drive into the system that has a full image of FreeBSD from another machine on it, stored in a tarball, and mount it under /mnt/mnt. I then start to untar it (to load that image onto my newly labeled disk), and that's when I see the errors. The OS running at that time is the FreeBSD 6.3 Fixit environment. > I just bought a new MSI P4M900M2 mobo. It works just fine with both > Windoze and SUSE Linux. When I tried booting 6.2 on it, it refused to > set the drive (ad0 - I tried several different drives) into the > higher speed UDMA modes. So, I downloaded 6.3, and it *seemed* to > be fine. The drives come up as UDMA 100 or UDMA 133. > > But ... under long disk operations - say untaring a 2G tarball > stored on a USB drive - I start to see this: > > ad0: WARNING WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC ERROR > > And eventually: > > ad0: FAILURE WRITE_DMA Status=51 .... Error=84 > > g_vfs_done():ad0s1f ... > > > What's going on here? Is there a known driver problem with the VIA > chipsets? I took the two drives I tried this with, and stuck them > in another machine - no problem, so I kind of doubt this is a drive > problem. I have replaced the IDE cables as well. Again, this same > mobo and drive combo worked flawlessly doing the same thing under SUSE > Linux, so I'm thinking this is a software problem. > > Any help much appreciated... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 07:09:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A78106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79748FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:09:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA851EE843 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:09:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.093 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.093 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.176, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSlJJUTptz0m for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:09:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230871EE87B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:09:31 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DA24AB.8050709@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:09:31 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080313) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Fwd: Re: Compile error, kde related?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:09:39 -0000 > Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted I think you mixed some threading libraries. That string or variants of it, is nowhere to be found in /usr/src anymore. I found this post: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2004-March/001759.html Any of that relevant for you? like entries in libmap? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. Thank you Mel. I'll check it out. By the way, I tried to CC your mailaddress but it bounced. If you want the information from the bounced mail, Please let me know. Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 07:35:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E53C1065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54408FC27 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2E7PnVo041344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:25:49 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:48:15 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> <2FB616F9-6AA7-4BE5-A5A4-01207D34DA9C@mac.com> <47D9AF85.5010909@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <47D9AF85.5010909@tundraware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803140948.15584.jonathan@hst.org.za> X-Spam-Score: -4.399 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Subject: Re: Using Install CD To Prepare Hard Disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:35:14 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 00:49, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: > > On Mar 13, 2008, at 3:28 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> I would like to use the CD install menus to only prepare the hard > >> disk (Partition, Label, Format) without actually installing anything on > >> the drive. Can this be done? > > > > There should be a "(W)rite" option on the various pages which let you at > > least partition the drive without installing the software. > > Yup that was the magic - I missed it entirely. The option appears > in the label editor menu... > > Thanks! =46rom memory, isn't it also possible to do this by going into the Configur= ation=20 menu rather than entering the Standard installation? Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 08:01:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27402106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from panixgr@yahoo.com) Received: from web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF2AB8FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from panixgr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 66838 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2008 07:34:58 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=6PdQPVuMv9VVcSbNagzWWqx3g378ZSqK6GLIAkMmZ0cmcIkz4hrJWmFFOpG6DMxLmzNUIC+g/gW+At2fOWrr8jj7v0w9jKmOUYw6UkeYbxD/RTD5iEPzmypG1kr+YhKCXmkOuyAZxd1dm9gvQwby6AW4BDzKNJgyW6l7AUPU/lg=; X-YMail-OSG: JKf_HJwVM1lWRBKgsyT.ch1t8wx4tQ6mYd17sH3qi47sw_T6000n18y2pJIKhO1oeZNIQxhlz9mLB_HYWis7fS6LO17AZx21TE2PQ9T7RwubVSHtYks- Received: from [62.103.35.211] by web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:34:58 PDT Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:34:58 -0700 (PDT) From: panix panix To: ejcerejo@optonline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <383544.65998.qm@web31601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Noatun and Kaboodle Skips X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:01:39 -0000 Hi, Sorry for the cross posting, but i found the original msg in -questions while the appropriate list i think would be -multimedia. I have the exact symptoms with E. J. Cerejo. One can easily abandon noatun, kaboodle and run any other player around (anything else i tried seem to work fine, totem, amarok,mpg123,mpg321,etc...), but noatun is the default player, and any non technical users (children/wifes) using FreeBSD home machines face problems playing sound thus creating a negative feeling about the system. Here is my bug report from kde.org, notice how the problem can be twicked around when running both noatun, kaboodle at the same time. http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159256 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 08:12:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D101065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F93B8FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:12:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6801EE872 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:12:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.884 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.884 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.966, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, MISSING_HEADERS=1.581, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvtAAQqSNKYg for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:12:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc01.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1E1EE834 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:12:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DA3366.4090506@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:12:22 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080312) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803121916.47569.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47D8DBC0.3010106@eskk.nu> <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:12:31 -0000 > > I think you mixed some threading libraries. That string or variants of it, is > nowhere to be found in /usr/src anymore. > > I found this post: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2004-March/001759.html > > Any of that relevant for you? like entries in libmap? > I read the thread and checked my libmap.conf. There's none of the entries mentioned in the post. I'd like to add that my system is an upgraded 7.0 - release from 6.2. I made pkg_delete -a because I had a problem with libcrypt that I couldn't fix. I'll appreciate any hint. Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 08:19:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEC71065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CCA8FC27 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:19:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BB11EE85E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:19:13 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.884 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.884 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.966, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, MISSING_HEADERS=1.581, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C0AW2B8cWVaz for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:19:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc01.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D712F1EE86E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:19:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DA34FB.803@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:19:07 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080312) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803121916.47569.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47D8DBC0.3010106@eskk.nu> <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:19:15 -0000 I don't know if it can be of any help but if I ctrl-c the cli when the compiling hangs I get the following. Mutex unlock failure: Operation not permitted ^Cgmake[2]: *** Deleting file `kdcopview.cpp' gmake[2]: *** [kdcopview.cpp] Interrupt: 2 gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Interrupt: 2 gmake: *** [all] Interrupt: 2 /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 09:09:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E231065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9AB8FC25 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D551CDE4; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:09:42 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:09:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47DA0D3A.7060505@Bomgardner.net> In-Reply-To: <47DA0D3A.7060505@Bomgardner.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141009.40716.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Gene Bomgardner Subject: Re: Getting .info messages on console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:09:43 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 06:29:30 Gene Bomgardner wrote: > I'm running postfix with postgrey on FreeBSD 7.x. > > For some reason, postgrey is sending info messages such as > > acxtion=greylist, reason=new, client=xxxxxx, sender=yyyy, ... > > I've looked in syslog.conf and the postgrey docs without any success. > > Can anyone point me in the right direction? syslog_facility => 'mail', See around line 567 how the Net::Server object is setup. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 09:18:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC161065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7122B8FC21 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A127E1CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:18:29 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, troy@twisted.net Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:18:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080314042248.GA47391@twisted.net> In-Reply-To: <20080314042248.GA47391@twisted.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141018.28429.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Vim insert mode requires 'i' three times X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:18:30 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 05:22:48 Troy wrote: > I'm not sure if anyone has seen this but it started a few months ago. > When I startup vim I have to hit 'i' three times to get it to go into > insert mode. I started troubleshooting my .vimrc file and figured out > that as long as I have a .vimrc file, even if it's completely blank it > exhibits this behavior. I notice that there is a 'c' letter in the buffer > upon startup but again there is nothing that is in the .vimrc file that is > causing this to load. > > If I delete the .vimrc file and start the program, I can hit 'i' once and > it will go into insert mode like it's supposed to. > > I have had this problem on 6.3 and just upgraded to 7.0 and it still is > there. This is happening on two different FreeBSD machines. > > One machine is running: > > vim+ruby-7.1.242_5 > vim-lite-7.1.242 > > Anyone have any idea why this is happening? Never seen this, but the only thing consistent throughout installations is the .viminfo file, so maybe delete that? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 09:26:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D5D1065678 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531E38FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383E51CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:26:52 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:26:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <20080314015808.GC28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <20080314024839.GD28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> In-Reply-To: <20080314024839.GD28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141026.50881.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:26:53 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 03:48:39 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Wael Nasreddine said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:58:08AM +0100: > > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:08:43AM +0100: > > > On Friday 14 March 2008 01:43:28 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > > > > Anyway, I switched from Gentoo to FreeBSD like a month ago, I'm quite > > > > happy with it, very stable very reliable, but I'm having trouble > > > > installing azureus. Since it's a server, that doesn't even have a > > > > monitor attached to it, I have no use for any X11 dependencies, so > > > > I've added to make.conf > > > > > > > > --------CUT > > > > WITHOUT_X11=yes > > > > --------CUT > > > > > > Unfortunately, that switch isn't working as "I don't want anything > > > pulled in that uses X11", but rather as "If this port can be built > > > without X11, then I will obey that, otherwise I will go ahead and > > > install X11". > > > Maybe that's a project for next google's summer of code. > > > > > > Anyway, the port depends on x11-toolkits/swt, which is what pulls in X. > > > If you know that azareus can be built without X, you could request > > > support for it through the send-pr(1) mechanism, but it doesn't look > > > like that'd be an easy job. > > > > Oh that's too bad :S since I need it, I'll just install it with the X > > dependencies... > > > > Thanks anyway, I appreciate your help :) > > I'm having a problem compiling libXext, here's the log: > > --------CUT > ===> Cleaning for libXext-1.0.3,1 > > ===> Extracting for libXext-1.0.3,1 > => MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/lib/libXext-1.0.3.tar.bz2. > => SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/lib/libXext-1.0.3.tar.bz2. > ===> Patching for libXext-1.0.3,1 > ===> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xextproto.pc - found ===> libXext-1.0.3,1 > depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xproto.pc - found ===> > libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc - not > found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc in > /usr/ports/x11/libX11 => No directory for > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc. Skipping.. Well, here's the weird part. Are you missing part of your ports tree? Like /usr/ports/x11/libX11? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 09:39:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49505106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E22B8FC16 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545A91CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:39:04 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:39:02 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DA3366.4090506@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <47DA3366.4090506@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141039.03096.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:39:05 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 09:12:22 Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I think you mixed some threading libraries. That string or variants of > > it, is nowhere to be found in /usr/src anymore. > > > > I found this post: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads/2004-March/001759.html > > > > Any of that relevant for you? like entries in libmap? > > I read the thread and checked my libmap.conf. There's none of the > entries mentioned in the post. > > I'd like to add that my system is an upgraded 7.0 - release from 6.2. > I made pkg_delete -a because I had a problem with libcrypt that I > couldn't fix. > > I'll appreciate any hint. Ok, the error is generated by uic: ./src/tools/qmutex_unix.cpp: qWarning("Mutex unlock failure: %s", strerror(ret)); Which fails on pthread_mutex_unlock call. Could you show the output of: ldd /usr/local/bin/uic -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 09:43:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED498106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD31D8FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360281EE905 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:43:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.885 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.885 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.965, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, MISSING_HEADERS=1.581, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ephWanm7nFR for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:43:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD291EE89A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:43:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DA48C1.5010306@eskk.nu> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:43:29 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080313) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803132240.02746.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DA3366.4090506@eskk.nu> <200803141039.03096.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803141039.03096.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:43:38 -0000 > > Ok, the error is generated by uic: > ./src/tools/qmutex_unix.cpp: qWarning("Mutex unlock failure: %s", > strerror(ret)); > > Which fails on pthread_mutex_unlock call. > Could you show the output of: > ldd /usr/local/bin/uic > > bsdpc01# ldd /usr/local/bin/uic /usr/local/bin/uic: libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x280d0000) libmng.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x287b2000) libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 (0x28813000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x28832000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x28857000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x28869000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x28871000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x28879000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x28880000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x28889000) libXft.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x2888c000) libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x2889e000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x2890c000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28936000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28944000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28a31000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x28a39000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x28a50000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x28b45000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x28b5a000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x28b65000) libaudio.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x28c61000) libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x28c77000) liblcms.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x28cc7000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x28cf7000) libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x28cfc000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x28d1c000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x28d1f000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x28d24000) /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 10:51:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424201065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1A8FC2C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D224C32610 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:51:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.5.3 (20071212) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id igZDkxIiN3wS for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:51:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.18.181.36] (unknown [81.253.1.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grego03) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87947325FB for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:51:36 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <3B2A172E-1EFC-4D3B-8502-FBC47256DAF5@todoo.biz> From: bsd To: Liste FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:51:35 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Subject: freebsd-update moving from GENERIC to SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:51:38 -0000 Hello, I have updated my server yesterday from 5.5 to 6.3 using the cvsup =20 classical method. Everything went fine but I forgot to deploy an SMP kernel :-( Is there a way to deploy a 6.3 SMP using freebsd-update method (which =20= is fantastic). Thanks for your answer. =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 10:58:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1271065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukejee@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C158FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lukejee@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4437695waf.3 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:58:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; bh=tujlMIpRmdmDNma9kiMZj7fIQcOOOYgzD9Np7ad8yBo=; b=VA6+/AmP3AOhvFueIbbdQ51U63tF4zbnouij4VxYWt7wfCah2+EVck5UE86qg3ZUG5WrZdq3TYTt9o8AmHo2DExTDei9HSnUqe9pT4MKZxrUfRNumSicYNZOgg5y4Fcmv7LqpOjEknRq97rBhQ2BSjLg8nXzBnx9ahCdbxPAD2A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:x-mailer; b=YfslSVkB//A5wEM6LTOO1wIyYz+pAAdkRyxX8lIq92DjC5ODtPGcVP3PWECm+6VpiVzAEClt59k6CpJ3blhAYRLg5M/JJR52CcRI3LSydksi8UU9wP9aTOjFQLTBmF0giptIjAEsDWekOBDj4qwGyu983qz60GB86ge71uSLefk= Received: by 10.114.95.1 with SMTP id s1mr11485197wab.99.1205492318068; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.217? ( [218.90.32.187]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m31sm28387276wag.28.2008.03.14.03.58.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <7E71E028-410D-4EB5-A496-B5B8E521869E@gmail.com> From: Luke Jee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:58:26 +0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Subject: about mount mfs root on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:58:39 -0000 Hi, guys, I want to make a minimal freebsd boot disc on i386 and amd64. I had created some folders and copyed somy files, include / boot/cdboot, /boot/kernel, etc.... and then i made a mfs root file image, then copy /sbin/init to it, and make a iso for boot. it works on i386, mount root from md is ok, but when i test on amd64 system, after mount root from md, system hang and no more messsages display, so i reboot with boot -v, then see start_init: / sbin/init after mount root from md, how can i solve it? sorry about my poor english. Thanks Luke Jee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 11:00:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832C91065674 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tektonaut@fuckner.net) Received: from dedihh.fuckner.net (dedihh.fuckner.net [81.209.183.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DDE8FC23 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tektonaut@fuckner.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dedihh.fuckner.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94F261D41 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:41:01 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fuckner.net Received: from dedihh.fuckner.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dedihh.fuckner.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id lB66OFy2SFbf for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:40:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.12.3.67] (e176170045.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.176.170.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dedihh.fuckner.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECE3A61D4F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:40:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DA5637.7000209@fuckner.net> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:40:55 +0100 From: Tektonaut User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: bsdlabel offset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:00:53 -0000 Hi, following bsdllabel output caught my attention: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 2097152 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 b: 4194304 2097152 swap c: 312576642 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 33554432 6291456 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 ... I created this disk with sade or sysinstall. What I'm not sure about is that partition 'a' has an offset of 0. With an 8k big /boot/boot I would guess offset should be 16block large. But since the disk is booting, some boot1 loader ist located at sector 0 (from the beginning of this slice). How is it assured, that the first block will never be overwritten? Where is boot1 located, where boot2? Comparing the first sector with boot and boot1 differs already at the first char. (and there were no updates so far) Little bemused regards, Adam -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 06:47:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F7C1065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) Received: from apca.co.ug (mail.apca.co.ug [212.88.116.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5248FC28 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) Received: from [192.168.0.121] (helo=IT) by apca.co.ug with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja3BV-0001nJ-H9 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:14:35 +0300 From: "Dedan Kiruri" To: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:16:56 +0300 Organization: APCA Message-ID: <001501c8859b$0404aee0$0c0e0ca0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AciFmwDOMCzsgjPXTiSMOgcXTFzMUw== Content-Language: en-us X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:40:22 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:47:36 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 5.0 mail server and I need help on updating on the following Updating the antivirus Updating the spam levels /spam assassin Managing the interfaces Basic commands lines Thank you Dedan Kiruri IT Support Co-ordinator African Palliative Care Association PO Box 72518 Plot 850 Dr Gibbons Road Kampala, Uganda Mob: +256 752 664 514 Tel: +256 414 266251 Fax: +256 414 266217 email: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug www.apca.co.ug APCA's Mission Statement is to promote and support affordable and culturally appropriate Palliative Care throughout Africa This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the sender ( dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) immediately and destroy all copies of the original e-mail message and any attachments. Any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is prohibited From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 11:47:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79501065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3628FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-02.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EBlh2U011379; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:47:43 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.32]) by mx-av-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2EBlhfS028265; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:47:43 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (adsl102-242.kln.forthnet.gr [77.49.109.242]) by MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2EBlZHM008968; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:47:37 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-05.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2EBlZcP003335; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:47:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2EBlXvk003334; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:47:33 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:47:33 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Troy Message-ID: <20080314114733.GA3248@kobe.laptop> References: <20080314042248.GA47391@twisted.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314042248.GA47391@twisted.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vim insert mode requires 'i' three times X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:47:48 -0000 On 2008-03-13 23:22, Troy wrote: > I'm not sure if anyone has seen this but it started a few months ago. > When I startup vim I have to hit 'i' three times to get it to go into > insert mode. I started troubleshooting my .vimrc file and figured out > that as long as I have a .vimrc file, even if it's completely blank it > exhibits this behavior. I notice that there is a 'c' letter in the > buffer upon startup but again there is nothing that is in the .vimrc > file that is causing this to load. It sounds like you are using the wrong terminal type. Is this a console-based session of VIM? Is it under X11? What is your TERM value? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 11:48:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58F01065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpefore@yahoo.com) Received: from web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.39.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8654B8FC2D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpefore@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 11240 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2008 11:22:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=xCw48Tm3kSlKGCT7Q8Hk37u0HZhHWxS0TVSULDGws4BMwHHVnQb0Vmf0vQp5kPaI98fAuGolFg5aCnax5bgd2YKwY8KcKNIhRM7Wa7vk9FhaX/dg5tlcDZYtIDfbUmnzml2tA+beHT1+g8kRcUVcV4I/iA4EuZP7aJpMmCCEp2Y=; X-YMail-OSG: yvvICwQVM1lfZYtNNugW.0Rh6ghSV5FXRpaJE2PHP7kEaD17ZuFm0gnKp10PKjMFDw-- Received: from [90.177.48.143] by web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:22:14 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/902.38 YahooMailWebService/0.7.185 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:22:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Demacek To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: Major version binary upgrade 6.3-RELEASE -> 7-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:48:56 -0000 Hi, in my testing environemnt I've tryied binary upgrade from 6.3-RELEASE -> 7-RELEASE by following Colin Percival's article at http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-11-freebsd-major-version-upgrade.html I am stuck at the step "portupgrade -f ruby": ---> Reinstalling 'ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1' (lang/ruby18) ---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/ruby18' ===> Cleaning for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 ===> Found saved configuration for ruby-1.8.6,1 ===> Extracting for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 => MD5 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/dl/h2rb /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/bin/ ===> Patching for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|-l$pthread_lib|-pthread|g' /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure /bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/Win32API /bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/win32ole /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/gdbm /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/iconv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/tk /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ ===> Configuring for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 /usr/bin/touch /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... Bad system call (core dumped) configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. See `config.log' for more details. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to stas@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. ! lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1) (configure error) Any suggestions? Thank you. Dan. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 11:59:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6462106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D078FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3BB51C006; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:59:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (unknown [10.4.16.222]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F7F31E703; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:59:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2EBxQxP002241; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:59:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Tijl Coosemans To: Reid Linnemann Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:59:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D8C274.5030107@cs.okstate.edu> <47D9A07F.5040108@cs.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <47D9A07F.5040108@cs.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141259.25941.tijl@ulyssis.org> X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-Spam-Status: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-49.9, required 5, autolearn=disabled, KUL_SMTPS -50.00, RDNS_NONE 0.10) X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: tijl@ulyssis.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DRI on radeon 9500 using too wide memory bus? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:57 -0000 On Thursday 13 March 2008 22:45:35 Reid Linnemann wrote: > Written by Reid Linnemann on 03/13/08 00:58>> >> I've had DRI running on a radeon 9500 for a while now, and at some >> point in time tracking 6-STABLE and continuing now on 7-STABLE I've >> started seeing rendering artifacts in gl in the form of a >> cross-hatch pattern of pixels that don't get filled. At first I >> figured the card was failing, but I remembered a fact about the 9500 >> that made me doublethink that. >> >> The radeon 9500 is an r300 chipset, and differs from the 9700 only >> in the width of the memory bus (128 bit vs 256 bit) and possibly >> clock speed. If memory serves, the chip itself had the capacity to >> address 256 bits, but most 9500s just went out the door with 128 bit >> memory. I remember at one point in time trying out a hack to the >> 9500 driver that enabled the 256 bit bus to see if I had a rebadged >> 9700, and had similar artifacts. >> >> So I decided to peruse my X logs, and sure enough I see: >> (--) RADEON(0): Mapped VideoRAM: 131072 kByte (256 bit DDR SDRAM) >> >> Is it possible that the radeon driver is using the 256 bus? Is there >> a way to force it to use a 128 bit bus? Has anyone else seen this? > > On further investigation, I tried forcing the driver to switch to a > 128 bit bus by setting the R300_MEM_NUM_CHANNELS_MASK bits on > RADEON_MEM_CNTL to 0x1, but the problem did not go away. > > I'll try describing it a little better.. only with gl acceleration, > the entire gl context appears to have criss-crossing lines 4 pixels > wide that are randomly filled correctly or black, so that they form > roughly a chain link fence pattern of trash on the gl context. Anyone > have an idea? I can't help you with this, but I'm thinking you'll have a higher chance getting an answer on some DRI/DRM mailinglist. You could also ask the port maintainers (x11@). Some of them are also active developers on DRI, and the r300 driver, or at least used to be in the past. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 12:13:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAD0106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400348FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from lack-of-gravitas.thebunker.net (gateway.ash.thebunker.net [213.129.64.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2ECCGhO010549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:12:24 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2ECCGhO010549 Message-ID: <47DA6B9F.8010608@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:12:15 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug References: <001501c8859b$0404aee0$0c0e0ca0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> In-Reply-To: <001501c8859b$0404aee0$0c0e0ca0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:12:24 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6228/Fri Mar 14 04:45:15 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:13:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dedan Kiruri wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 5.0 mail server and I need help on updating on the > following > > > > Updating the antivirus > > Updating the spam levels /spam assassin > > Managing the interfaces > > Basic commands lines > Hmmm... Have you read the FreeBSD handbook? It has realms of good advice covering all aspects of managing FreeBSD machines -- including updating software, network configuration and quite a lot of example command lines for routine operations -- and it is all presented in nice clear English accessible to complete beginners with the OS. It's online at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ If you have any questions arising from what you learn from the handbook, then please feel free to ask again here. For best results please tell us as much as you can about the specifics of what you are trying to do: we are neither omniscient nor telepathic, and unless we have some more detailed information we won't be able to provide you any sensible or meaningful answers. At least tell us what antivirus software, what versions of spam assassin, what MTA you're using (including version numbers). Also, a subject line of 'help' really is not helping yourself at all. Many readers of this list will skip over your e-mail unread because of it. Something like 'how do I update my mail server?' would have been a better choice. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. Flat 3 7 Priory Courtyard PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW, UK -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREDAAYFAkfaa58ACgkQ3jDkPpsZ+VbqegCgmc0yWtBRG5uuFQ7Zy2x7eBRm rIgAn0XrYn9D7KOFK5IDfgigG63HHsim =2lB7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 12:16:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D09106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55AB28FC26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2ECC2T2002083; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:12:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2ECBrH7002080; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:12:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:11:53 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Dedan Kiruri In-Reply-To: <001501c8859b$0404aee0$0c0e0ca0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> Message-ID: <20080314131147.J2079@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <001501c8859b$0404aee0$0c0e0ca0$@kiruri@apca.co.ug> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:16:39 -0000 so start reading manuals NOW On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Dedan Kiruri wrote: > I have a FreeBSD 5.0 mail server and I need help on updating on the > following > > > > Updating the antivirus > > Updating the spam levels /spam assassin > > Managing the interfaces > > Basic commands lines > > > > Thank you > > > > > > Dedan Kiruri > IT Support Co-ordinator > African Palliative Care Association > PO Box 72518 > Plot 850 Dr Gibbons Road > Kampala, Uganda > Mob: +256 752 664 514 > Tel: +256 414 266251 > Fax: +256 414 266217 > email: dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug > > www.apca.co.ug > > APCA's Mission Statement is to promote and support affordable and culturally > appropriate Palliative Care throughout Africa > > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain private, confidential, and/or > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please > advise the sender ( > dedan.kiruri@apca.co.ug) immediately and destroy all copies of the original > e-mail message and any attachments. Any use, distribution, amendment, > copying or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance of this > message or attachments is prohibited > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 12:22:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F831065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B4C8FC1E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2ECMctk045179; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:22:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314072004.025b1ad0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:22:28 -0500 To: Daniel Demacek , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080313-0, 03/13/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Major version binary upgrade 6.3-RELEASE -> 7-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:23:00 -0000 At 06:22 AM 3/14/2008, Daniel Demacek wrote: >Hi, > >in my testing environemnt I've tryied binary upgrade from 6.3-RELEASE -> >7-RELEASE by following Colin Percival's article at >http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-11-freebsd-major-version-upgrade.html > >I am stuck at the step "portupgrade -f ruby": > >---> Reinstalling 'ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1' (lang/ruby18) >---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/ruby18' >===> Cleaning for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 >===> Found saved configuration for ruby-1.8.6,1 >===> Extracting for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 >=> MD5 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. >=> SHA256 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. >/bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/dl/h2rb >/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/bin/ >===> Patching for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 >===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 >/usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e >'s|-l$pthread_lib|-pthread|g' >/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure >/bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/Win32API >/bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/win32ole >/bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/gdbm >/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ >/bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/iconv >/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ >/bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/tk >/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ >===> Configuring for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 >/usr/bin/touch /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure >configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target >checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 >checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 >checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 >checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6-gcc... cc >checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out >checking whether the C compiler works... Bad system call (core dumped) >configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. >If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. >See `config.log' for more details. >===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. >Please report the problem to stas@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the >"/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/config.log" including the output >of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide >an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls >/var/db/pkg`). >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. >*** Error code 1 > >Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. > ! lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1) (configure error) > > > >Any suggestions? Thank you. >Dan. > Try: portupgrade -fP ruby instead to install ruby from the 7.0 built package. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 12:35:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57D11065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsmtkk@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5D38FC15 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hsmtkk@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so2149279ele.12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:35:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FOzs6C9LcvSKYjziVxJxnUUBKtB538asbIlMh3maOJ4=; b=MheozwUQn1ZCvHn0DYdFY2Y1m5Y/FSZGKX4y1U0O20A5EKoO2PJPSpOq/jf1TDr55q9l1Rbb16qyWzkfJ1sR7RhY3RcVNgYRahCY1YXdamypI/Af5e3+dnP76zqzctyDM45VOOyS3tsJFwM3jZEuj2Gm/mEkLKmxiPJ8GPqhEEY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KeGEjzEOMvR30w+FJUzc19eRZPJVn6S0DVgOUk0CsZCuNwS+NBH4+RgCxvLY8JcfiIdx+LmAMnx/4BkJFzN69FbwjX479KV+EZNh5Do97R2fEQd0JV++a8xK4dwsqKNl8I8M1OqdIINOZpxn6MGPcJeOKVzX9RPanfbzOapAlQU= Received: by 10.150.150.3 with SMTP id x3mr6274454ybd.93.1205496563509; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.135.20 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6bae2c430803140509k40d83eebldf7b445fe3f83853@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:09:23 +0900 From: Hashimoto To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Major version binary upgrade 6.3-RELEASE -> 7-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:35:47 -0000 my machine is 7.0-RELEASE # portupgrade -f ruby ===> Found saved configuration for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 ===> Extracting for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 => MD5 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/dl/h2rb /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/bin/ ===> Patching for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|-l$pthread_lib|-pthread|g' /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure /bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/Win32API /bin/rm -rf /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/win32ole /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/gdbm /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/iconv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/tk /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ ===> Configuring for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 /usr/bin/touch /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7 checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd7-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no ...(continuing)... ===> Cleaning for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 ---> Cleaning out obsolete shared libraries successfully finished. can you compile&run C program on your machine? hsmtkk@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 12:53:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CA2106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aline@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C13A8FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aline@riseup.net) Received: from tern.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tern.riseup.net", Issuer "ipsCA CLASEA1 Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E5D5705EF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:52:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: aline@tern.riseup.net) with ESMTP id 3BA5814C263 From: Aline de Freitas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:52:49 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <266882.9012.qm@web50111.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2747064.aQxzo7Ijml"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200803140952.51722.aline@riseup.net> Subject: Re: Major version binary upgrade 6.3-RELEASE -> 7-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:53:00 -0000 --nextPart2747064.aQxzo7Ijml Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Em Friday 14 March 2008 08:22:14 Daniel Demacek escreveu: > Hi, > > in my testing environemnt I've tryied binary upgrade from 6.3-RELEASE -> > 7-RELEASE by following Colin Percival's article at > http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2007-11-11-freebsd-major-version-upgrade.= ht >ml > > I am stuck at the step "portupgrade -f ruby": > > ---> Reinstalling 'ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1' (lang/ruby18) > ---> Building '/usr/ports/lang/ruby18' > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 > =3D=3D=3D> Found saved configuration for ruby-1.8.6,1 > =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 > =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for ruby/ruby-1.8.6-p111.tar.bz2. > /bin/mv /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/dl/h2rb > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/bin/ =3D=3D=3D> Patching for > ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 > =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1 > /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's|-l$pthread_lib|-pthread|g'=20 > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure /bin/rm -rf > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/Win32API /bin/rm -rf > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/win32ole /bin/mv > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/gdbm > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/iconv > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ /bin/mv > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/ext/tk > /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ =3D=3D=3D> Configuring for ruby-1.8.6.111_1= ,1 > /usr/bin/touch /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/configure > configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target > checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 > checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 > checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6 > checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6-gcc... cc > checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > checking whether the C compiler works... Bad system call (core dumped) > configure: error: cannot run C compiled programs. > If you meant to cross compile, use `--host'. > See `config.log' for more details. > =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > Please report the problem to stas@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the > "/usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.6-p111/config.log" including the > output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea > to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an > `ls > /var/db/pkg`). > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ruby18. > ! lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1) (configure error) > > > > Any suggestions? Thank you. > Dan. > > > > In my experience, when I moved from 6.2 to 7.0 I had to recompile portupgra= de=20 at hand first. To do this you need to recompile portupgrade and all his=20 dependencies by doing 'make install clean' in each one. Yes, ruby is one of= =20 the portupgrade dependencies... And after, with a fresh portupgrade compile= d=20 in the new 7.0 environment, I've done portupgrade -fa. =2D-=20 Aline de Freitas - Chave p=FAblica: ID DE632016 / keys.indymedia.org gpg --keyserver keys.indymedia.org --recv-keys DE632016 --nextPart2747064.aQxzo7Ijml Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkfadSMACgkQhLRvs95jIBZUjgCeMLWaYfwu+fhY6uHgHWDdsMwP gNwAnjMRFDKsXn6hLyTS6hlBg2Hhn76U =VfuJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2747064.aQxzo7Ijml-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 13:58:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDF5106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@hosting.vnn.vn) Received: from hosting.vnn.vn (hosting.vnn.vn [203.162.96.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE18FC26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@hosting.vnn.vn) Received: (qmail 12993 invoked by uid 48); 14 Mar 2008 21:00:34 +0700 Date: 14 Mar 2008 21:00:34 +0700 Message-ID: <20080314140034.12992.qmail@hosting.vnn.vn> To: questions@freebsd.org From: "©" 1995-2008 FedEx Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: FedEx Customer Services: Your Missing Package Is Found Urgent Action Needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:58:11 -0000 FEDEX * 18 Argungu Road Abeokuta street, Kaduna Nigeria. TEL.....+234-805-543-8543 DATE: 12/03/2008 Custormers Service Hours--Monday To Saturdays: Office Hours Monday To Saturdays: Attention, Attention, Attention: The FedEx courier Service Company are hereby passing an essential massage to all our valuable customers to be very careful while presenting their receivers residential address to avoid wrong delivery. This is the FedEx courier service company mailing you as per your parcel that was brought to this company to be delivered to you by one Mrs. SHERRY WILLIAMS, along the delivery process there came a misunderstanding between you and the Nicon Insurance Company in regard of their request as per their insurance certificate which happens to be course of your Parcel pending for the past one year. Meanwhile we are hereby happy to inform you that the FedEx Company has finalized everything with Nicon Insurance Company Of Nigeria, the company organization has also listed 24 valuable parcel's to be intact in their office after the released of the parcel's from the Nicon Insurance Company. We are happy to inform you once again that your parcel that contain the sum of $ 1.3 million dollars is among the 24 parcel's listed which is now in our office and also with your name as the receiver despise that we lost your private residential address's, also with your private line which is an indication that you can now re-send your residential address back to the FedEx company where your Parcel can be delivered without hesitation with this e-mail: [1]deliveryservices.fedex@gmail.com fedexdeliveryservices@inMail24.com Meanwhile remember that the sender of this parcel Mrs. Sherry Williams still owes this company the sum of $178.50 US DOLLARS before incident Occurs, this company has spent out of their incomes in the process by recovering back your parcel, so dear costumer we once again appreciate your patronage in our favor. Without hesitations you are to pay for just the balance left by your sender via Money Gram so that your parcel can be delivered to your residential address before it accumulate a demurrage after one week only, as you know your parcel is not just an ordinary parcel but with a huge amount and I think you understand what I mean by accumulating a demurrage? Which you will not allow to happen to your recovery parcel that is almost gone if not for the love that the good God have for you by favoring you with his favour because it was God who did it not by your power but by the spirit say the lord. We assure you that your parcel will arrive at your country in two days time and it will get to your door step by the third Or fourth day as soon as this company receive the balance left by your sender' and the tracking number of your parcel will be sent to you via e-mail immediately so that you can track it yourself to see your parcel coming on the way and you will also know when it will arrive at your country because we operate in trust and loyalty in your favour. And also the FedEx courier Service Company is hereby informing all their customers by eradicating all their communication with the scam mails that are going all-over the world to be careful with their e-mails so that your parcel will not be in danger with their evil planes. FedEx provides access to a growing global marketplace through a network of supply chain,transportation, business and related information services. NOTE: THAT THE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE VIA MONEY GRAM TO THE NAME OF OUR HEAD, ACCOUNT OFFICER MR LOLADE ADEDOYIN IN WEST AFRICA WITH THIS BELOW PAYMENT INFORMATION. SENDERS NAME: RECEIVERS NAME: LOLADE ADEDOYIN SENDERS ADDRESS: DESTINATION: LAGOS-NIGERIA TEXT QUESTION: WHO IS LORD? TEXT ANSWER: HELPER AMOUNT SENT: $178.50 US DOLLARS REF#: (8 DIGITS GIVEN AT THE MONEY GRAM OUTLET ) FedEx is one of the world's great success stories, the start-up that revolutionized the delivery of packages and information. In the past 30 years, we've grown up and grown into a diverse family of companies -a FedExthat's bigger, stronger, better than ever. WAITING TO READ YOUR E-MAIL. YOURS TRULY. LARRY MOORE FEDEX COURIER MANAGING DIRECTOR. FedEx Offers Global Shipping, Logistics Management, Supply Chain Management and More. * References 1. mailto:deliveryservices.fedex@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:17:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684D71065674 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:17:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422208FC2B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:17:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2EFI3N7019922; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:18:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2EFI2S5019921; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:18:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:18:02 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Tim Daneliuk Message-ID: <20080314151802.GB19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Using Install CD To Prepare Hard Disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:17:50 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:28:22PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I would like to use the CD install menus to only prepare the hard > disk (Partition, Label, Format) without actually installing anything on > the drive. Can this be done? There seems to be no "None" option for > Distributions, and I cannot find the right magic to make the installer > go ahead and prepare the drive w/o resorting to at least a minimal install. > > I assume if the answer is "no" then that means this has to be done > manually from the fixit command line???? That is the easiest way that I know. I think you can get past the disk build and just turn off all the stuff to install, but doing fdisk, bsdlabel and newfs is really quite easy and less trouble. ////jerry > > Thanks, > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com > PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:24:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5851065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6498D8FC26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so2217170ele.12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=++tOw/WlrnKV/5L2XdeRUAEr5k6V5tNNleAIRQcQPpk=; b=s1TjFgdV6dKRu8bJLcXumgIw52L3aFEW9vtBExKZC5nfvZlWxWH8vGrKbeGMKhiNm8DQdzs7HU7sEVTe5vWNPuEvLTUylLnDIvPxaCYzq6KIbBFvBniUGikUxUSIoLBXnsRoO/RPIo57Ff26hUS9tN3Q7sSrHBe3y50+14rmwno= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UIh7zuv5B4SpfHm12pdL0c5OwKt0fkReImI/S3UBp27CHQmpyQn3GaCPCKEC78rDTUbknuX7m0DdrqN3Ki6LVZqIileTCCok0SiJCtpm227429BSp+FZ2ib0GF8CqeiqdNnxWJcUH83ARlvxJnlMZlwRjk168GoM83iEKBDfW98= Received: by 10.114.175.16 with SMTP id x16mr11976276wae.12.1205508239606; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.15 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540803140823n6f838fdaj7692571f69003fb5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:23:59 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "Patrick Mahan" In-Reply-To: <47DA13AF.5090804@mahan.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <340a29540803130910l2a5badacxe50cd81ace87e1f7@mail.gmail.com> <47D9682B.5060402@mahan.org> <340a29540803131111g20315740n629ee146bc2f8602@mail.gmail.com> <47DA13AF.5090804@mahan.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Network programming question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:24:01 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Patrick Mahan wrote: > > > > inet_pton() clobbered the fields you pointed out. In fact the sin_family > field was being set to 0x01 which caused your initial EADDRNOTSUPPORT error > you were seeing. You quick change fixed that problem. However, (depending > on how sockaddr_in structure is actually allocated) the sin_addr field was > 0.0.0.0. This is actually an accepted form of the broadcast address for UDP > packets. I forget exactly who the culprit was (Sun comes to mind) but there > was a need to allow broadcasts to 0.0.0.0 (which is also know as INADDR_ANY). > So, therefore, sendto() succeeded, just not in the way you expected. Looking > at in_pcbconnect_setup() in the kernel shows that actually the packet is sent > to the local primary interface address. > > Let's look at what really happen to that packet - > > "192.168.0.1" after being mangled by inet_pton() gives > the field sin_addr.s_addr of 0x0100A8C0. This should make > your sockaddr_in structure look like - > > sa.sin_len = 0x01 > sa.sin_family = 0x00 > sa.sin_port = 0xA8C0 (which is port 49320) > sa.sin_addr.s_addr = 0x00000000 > > So the sendto() call was sending a packet to your local interface for port 49320. > And since UDP is a connectionless protocol, you don't have a way (unless it is > builtin to your application protocol) to determine an error. For example, TFTP > sends back notification for every dgram received. > > I hope this helps with your understanding. I highly recommend if you are going > to do more network programming that you obtain at least some books on the subject. > > > Patrick > Thanks much for this explanation. Books would be good, yes. I guys got to learn somehow. Thanks for taking the time to explain it. That's interesting that a broadcast may be sent to 0.0.0.0. I knew that 0.0.0.0 is equal to INADDR_ANY. However, I thought it wasn't possible to send to that address, only to bind to it locally for a server application. Andy -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:25:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEC01065676 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EB38FC1C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) X-Trace: 28266595/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$INTERNET-ACCEPTED/None/62.31.10.181 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 62.31.10.181 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: xfb52@dial.pipex.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgABAG812kc+Hwq1/2dsb2JhbAAIqVs X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5200,2160,5251"; a="28266595" X-IP-Direction: OUT Received: from 62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO [192.168.23.2]) ([62.31.10.181]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2008 15:25:17 +0000 Message-ID: <47DA98D1.6050907@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:05 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Daneliuk References: <47D9AA86.2040105@tundraware.com> <20080314151802.GB19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080314151802.GB19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Using Install CD To Prepare Hard Disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:19 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:28:22PM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >I would like to use the CD install menus to only prepare the hard >disk (Partition, Label, Format) without actually installing anything on >the drive. Can this be done? There seems to be no "None" option for >Distributions, and I cannot find the right magic to make the installer >go ahead and prepare the drive w/o resorting to at least a minimal install. > Does the "Post install configuration" not give you all the menus you want? It doesn't matter whether you have anything installed or not - you can fdisk, bsdlabel and newfs from the sysinstall interfaces you know and love. And you won't be prompted to install any packages because you're not on a scripted install pathway. If you have bsdlabel and fdisk files which you are trying to replicate then the live filesystem and native tools may be easier, but if you want to play around with sizes etc. without resorting to a calculator then sysinstall has always done the business for me, --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:25:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40AA51065682 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3748FC31 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2EFPrVR019996; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:25:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2EFPrpX019995; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:25:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:25:53 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Modulok Message-ID: <20080314152553.GD19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/www a tradition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:25:40 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:29:55PM -0600, Modulok wrote: > Is there a compelling reason for placing subversion and web-server > data in /usr/local and not somewhere else? I was thinking of keeping > all user accounts (human and daemon alike) in one place like, > /home/www and /home/svn and so forth. > > Before I break convention, I just thought I'd see if placing said > files in /usr/local was just a tradition or if there was another > reason for it. You probably won't break anything, but it is the convention for FreeBSD structure. see: man hier Some things are easier to install when following the conventions because you have to do less special-casing and modifying config files. There may be some badly written utility out there that does not properly check config files and just assumes things are in the conventional places. I don't know of any and FreeBSD tries to avoid this problem. But, the time you find out is usually the most inconvenient time. So, you pays your money and you takes your chances. ////jerry > > Thanks. > -Modulok- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:32:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0DC1065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wearabnet@yahoo.ca) Received: from web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F38498FC1E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:32:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wearabnet@yahoo.ca) Received: (qmail 94489 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2008 15:32:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.ca; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=bsT5xeOO7vMAmL/sKJ5+RACj1t/63wsUfGdQhbIf/4aqUGOA8TSCLleaZ1Od/sZCTbGlc2wP2O0eufu6WLxfKe6Evk30ZXnpUhaCNfxR7/nvHwmY0WBm13rKdMC9Zx+oKfN2YsofYVG26WAYsG7v+WMD2meVqX5+eM3TsT7MFHQ=; X-YMail-OSG: 8S2bkwMVM1mIxAOurgBGKn.qACf8tKfzFswyOTLhx5OmAfqIr_9ppNbAZ_DP9Vari5Wa4VYMwRzBHrwXkbSgpWEZFu2PXuLWwuLttJSste1pr5GcG90- Received: from [89.211.3.3] by web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:32:30 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/902.38 YahooMailWebService/0.7.162 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:32:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Subject: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:32:31 -0000 Hello, I have this problem with apache 2.2.8, and I don't know the reason yet. FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 29 16:57:56 UTC 2008 admin@BB.WeArab.Net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x641d AMD Features=0x20100800 Logical CPUs per core: 2 usable memory = 2139377664 (2040 MB) avail memory = 2064826368 (1969 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 p4tcc1: on cpu1 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 em0: port 0x9000-0x901f mem 0xf9020000-0xf903ffff,0xf9000000-0xf901ffff irq 18 at device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:ba:51:8d em0: [FILTER] pcib3: at device 28.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 vgapci0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 24 at device 2.0 on pci3 pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 atapci0: port 0xb000-0xb03f,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb800-0xb87f mem 0xfd020000-0xfd020fff,0xfd000000-0xfd01ffff irq 23 at device 4.0 on pci4 atapci0: [ITHREAD] atapci0: [ITHREAD] ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci0 ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci0 ata4: [ITHREAD] ata5: on atapci0 ata5: [ITHREAD] isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata0: on atapci1 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci1 ata1: [ITHREAD] pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A sio1: [FILTER] orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 238475MB at ata0-master SATA150 ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 ad6: 381554MB at ata3-master SATA150 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a em0: link state changed to UP pid 8458 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 82334 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 82374 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 82375 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 82423 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 82520 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 here is my make.conf KERNCONF=BB PPP_NOSUID=true # to build ppp with normal permissions NO_BLUETOOTH=true # do not build Bluetooth related stuff NO_I4B=true # do not build isdn4bsd package NO_KERBEROS=true # do not build and install Kerberos 5 (KTH Heimdal) NO_LPR=true # do not build lpr and related programs NO_USB=true # do not build usbd(8) and related programs NO_ATM=true # do not build ATM related programs and libraries NO_GAMES=true # do not build games (games/ subdir) NO_UUCP=true # do not build uucp related programs WITHOUT_X11=true # don't build X11 dependencies in ports BATCH=yes # added by use.perl 2008-03-02 17:37:37 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 Regards, -Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Arab Portal http://www.WeArab.Net/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:48:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351C81065681 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901858FC2D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) X-Trace: 63394245/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$INTERNET-ACCEPTED/None/62.31.10.181 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 62.31.10.181 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: xfb52@dial.pipex.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgABAEs72kc+Hwq1/2dsb2JhbAAIqVw X-IP-Direction: OUT Received: from 62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO [192.168.23.2]) ([62.31.10.181]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2008 15:48:30 +0000 Message-ID: <47DA9E42.4070702@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:48:18 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Modulok References: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> <20080314152553.GD19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080314152553.GD19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/www a tradition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:48:33 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:29:55PM -0600, Modulok wrote: > Is there a compelling reason for placing subversion and web-server > data in /usr/local and not somewhere else? I was thinking of keeping > all user accounts (human and daemon alike) in one place like, > /home/www and /home/svn and so forth. > > Before I break convention, I just thought I'd see if placing said > files in /usr/local was just a tradition or if there was another > reason for it. Break the convention! Where apache or any other web server looks for its "home" is down to *your* apache config. Different vhosts can look wherever they like for their own homes and you can put them wherever you like - no need for them to be in the same place at all. So one vhost could look in /home/project1 and another in /home/project2/Web, for example. You could keep the default server in /usr/local/www and then you get the files the port installs by default, but still control where *your* data goes. I don't know how tied subversion is to it's home in /usr/local but I would hope "not at all". /home/cvs has been the home of my CVS repositories for a long time and if I switched VCS I'd certainly want to follow a pattern like that (certainly for anything that follows a CVS-like model, which subversion does. Something like Hg might be another matter, but then I'd be looking at putting repositories in project-specific locations). I dislike the notion of putting project-specific data under /usr/local. Config files and the like are easy to control, but large trees should be able to live wherever I want them to live. One can usually work around any issue that arise, and if you hit trouble, just mail back here :-) --Alex PS You said "demons" and I'd certainly draw a line between a demon like, say, postfix or bind which has a system-role and ones like apache, subversion or a database which have a project-role. Not sure it's a very firm line though - plenty of grey area. For me, if it's manageable with a simple CVSed config file or ten, then it can stay in /usr/local. If it breeds data, then it belongs somewhere else. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:51:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D9A1065679 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.w.barnes@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A40B8FC29 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.w.barnes@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so4790013fka.11 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=o0gtxnDJgjgkbFl4bLLF7tbTR2SINntua5YyntPOi5o=; b=YFTTK70dDyk5w6+QWQeRCz8RRnb/PfroAHHNgc0KmnPIW1Ik2IYxxrjnZtETfzPXM7fYJTAfiJVscSOBXSAGH9eJ9Nwlyolt9pQDKNxD2A4v2LHTlVjOgbXZHerHR3/PNGZ4r3xKq1kZNVUsIrv1X2QHcpKXp2HqzJIRU1C/gQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dAiyOuk0X68BPu4gCpX5tfoaGP0X/PCNH7HkjHqTxrOEPMR8jcLnfC9XdI1JZrjk7QXqiOla/gnJECLaFxBKZ07Xhp5T0FLgG9ABjg2Sl9SuhrMqePCm7X3P6ZKogwJ7qskSMw31agI51Xb9x9Fzvt6TDe7IHOvpbSgAqQ0GU3k= Received: by 10.82.118.2 with SMTP id q2mr26805486buc.27.1205508297448; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.181.13 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:24:57 -0700 From: "Jason Barnes" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:51:08 -0000 Hi -- I'm running a "Tombstone" machine that's functioning as a server. The machine is located somewhere with a fast connection, and not somewhere that I have easy access to. As such, I want this machine to do its best to boot up and get onto the network, no matter what happens on boot, so that I have a chance to actually fix the problem. Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. Is there a way that I can set the machine to do its best to boot no matter what it finds at boot time? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide, - Jason PS -- Boot messages not available, as the machine is down at the moment and I can't get over there to type " exit" until later this afternoon. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 15:52:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE3A1065678 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9A58FC16 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m2EFqNEV020090; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:52:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m2EFqMul020089; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:52:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:52:22 -0400 From: Jerry McAllister To: Tektonaut Message-ID: <20080314155222.GF19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <47DA5637.7000209@fuckner.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47DA5637.7000209@fuckner.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdlabel offset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:52:10 -0000 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:40:55AM +0100, Tektonaut wrote: > Hi, > > following bsdllabel output caught my attention: > > # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] > a: 2097152 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > b: 4194304 2097152 swap > c: 312576642 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't > edit > d: 33554432 6291456 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 > ... > > I created this disk with sade or sysinstall. What I'm not sure > about is that partition 'a' has an offset of 0. With an 8k big > /boot/boot I would guess offset should be 16block large. > > But since the disk is booting, some boot1 loader ist located at > sector 0 (from the beginning of this slice). How is it assured, > that the first block will never be overwritten? Where is boot1 > located, where boot2? > > Comparing the first sector with boot and boot1 differs already > at the first char. (and there were no updates so far) That sector 0 lies outside of the slice block 0. What you are seeing is not an absolute disk offset, but the offset in to the slice. It is possible to create it otherwise but isn't done that way by default. Nowdays, actually a whole track is held out, instead of just sector 0 and that is where some of the fancier MBRs such as GRUB get their extra space to work. But, the standard FreeBSD MBR sticks to the official standard of just one sector - which is why it is so plain vanilla. ////jerry > > > Little bemused regards, > Adam > > -- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:02:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA0C1065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760128FC21 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.237.85] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JaC7q-0000mT-L2; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:47:18 -0700 Message-ID: <47DA9E07.1020606@ccstores.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:47:19 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (85) Subject: wget / wput X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:02:31 -0000 I began using wput recently. While wput completes a transfer, it always ends with a Segmentation fault: 11 if the wput is forced to fail (with an incorrect password for instance) it issues what appears to be a correct response: "login-Sequence failed .." "Transmission of 1 file failed." but if the transfer completes as expected, Seg fault every time! suggestions would be appreciated. This is on FreeBSD 7.0 i386, however I noticed the same error on 6.2 (and quit using wput for THAT reason). Now I *would* like to use it, but this is disconcerting. thanks, Jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:04:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD41065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D258FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from [192.168.5.128] (jn@stealth.jnielsen.net [74.218.226.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m2EG4AhZ050007; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:04:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:04:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141204.09753.lists@jnielsen.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Jason Barnes Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:04:13 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 11:24:57 am Jason Barnes wrote: > Hi -- I'm running a "Tombstone" machine that's functioning as a > server. The machine is located somewhere with a fast connection, and > not somewhere that I have easy access to. As such, I want this > machine to do its best to boot up and get onto the network, no matter > what happens on boot, so that I have a chance to actually fix the > problem. > > Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that > some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It > says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh > single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly > unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or > not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. You probably want your NFS entries in fstab to have the "noauto" option, and you _definitely_ want the last two fields to be zeroes. Even if you _do_ want the NFS mounts to come up at boot I would still set them to be noauto and then write your own script to try to mount them later. > Is there a way that I can set the machine to do its best to boot no > matter what it finds at boot time? Thanks in advance for any help you > can provide, The bootup rc script is just a sh script, you can hack it to do whatever you want. That said, it only bails out if there's a (potentially) significant problem. Given that this is a remote machine, you should be extra-careful when modifying anything to do with the startup process, especially fstab or any firewall rules. You could also look at options like a serial console, IP KVM, or something like a LightsOut card for your system. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:30:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CE61065680 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from srvdmz12.oekb.co.at (srvdmz12.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BEA88FC57 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:30:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a@jenisch.at) Received: from msc01-n1 [143.245.2.187] by srvdmz12.oekb.co.at - SurfControl E-mail Filter (6.0.0); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:30:33 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:22 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2EGTM7P004221 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:22 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2EGTMQm004220 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:22 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:29:21 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314162921.GA3930@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2008 16:29:22.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F773A60:01C885F0] X-SEF-ZeroHour-RefID: fgs=0 X-SEF-7853D99-ADF1-478E-8894-213D316B8FFA: 1 X-SEF-Processed: 6_0_0_39__2008_03_14_17_30_33 Subject: 16GB AMD Opteron-machine - AMD64 or PAE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:30:35 -0000 Hi, For one of my machines (HP C-class Blade, 2 * AMD Opteron, 16GB RAM) should I go for the i386 or the amd64 Version of FreeBSD 7.0? As far as I've seen kernel and system isn't a problem with the amd64 version, but how about ports? To be specific here's what I'd like to install on this machine: o) mrtg o) cacti o) nfsen o) named (caching DNS only) o) ntpd o) TSM-client (Client for IBM Backup-System running in Linux emulation mode) Does anybody have experience with any of these applications under the amd64-Version of FreeBSD? Caveats any? Thanks in advance for any clue, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:35:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C861065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45A68FC2E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from yavin.vindaloo.com (yavin.vindaloo.com [172.24.144.34]) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6585CD6 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by yavin.vindaloo.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9E1D8253A9; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <8FB78ABB-AE42-412C-8463-A03E18D6C462@vindaloo.com> From: Christopher Sean Hilton To: "Jason Barnes" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes X-Smtp-Server: smtp.vindaloo.com:chris Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:03:00 -0400 References: Resent-From: chris@vindaloo.com Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:06:01 -0400 Resent-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Resent-Message-Id: <20080314160601.9E1D8253A9@yavin.vindaloo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:35:05 -0000 On Mar 14, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Jason Barnes wrote: > Hi -- I'm running a "Tombstone" machine that's functioning as a > server. The machine is located somewhere with a fast connection, and > not somewhere that I have easy access to. As such, I want this > machine to do its best to boot up and get onto the network, no matter > what happens on boot, so that I have a chance to actually fix the > problem. > > Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that > some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It > says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh > single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly > unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or > not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. > > Is there a way that I can set the machine to do its best to boot no > matter what it finds at boot time? Thanks in advance for any help you > can provide, > Depends on the whether or not the system needs something from the NFS mount at boot time. If it doesn't then you would do well to use amd (man 8 amd) to handle the mount. The short of is that amd automates the process of mounting a filesystem by presenting a directory. When a process requests a file within that directory amd performs the mount. Amd helps by deferring the mount until something actually needs something from the remote filesystem. Simpler still would be to change the mounts entry to noauto in /etc/ fstab. However then you or someone else will have to perform the mount when you need the filesystem. -- Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:42:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCFC1065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DB98FC20 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EGci4P009413; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:38:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2EGbrMD009409; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:38:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:37:53 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Ewald Jenisch In-Reply-To: <20080314162921.GA3930@aurora.oekb.co.at> Message-ID: <20080314173704.B9402@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080314162921.GA3930@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 16GB AMD Opteron-machine - AMD64 or PAE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:42:49 -0000 > > For one of my machines (HP C-class Blade, 2 * AMD Opteron, 16GB RAM) > should I go for the i386 or the amd64 Version of FreeBSD 7.0? amd64 version was created exactly for x86-64 systems so why do you like to use another? > > As far as I've seen kernel and system isn't a problem with the amd64 > version, but how about ports? > > To be specific here's what I'd like to install on this machine: > > o) mrtg > o) cacti > o) nfsen > o) named (caching DNS only) > o) ntpd > o) TSM-client (Client for IBM Backup-System running in Linux emulation mode) > > Does anybody have experience with any of these applications under the > amd64-Version of FreeBSD? Caveats any? linux emulation runs fine, named, ntpd, mrtg runs ok too > > Thanks in advance for any clue, > -ewald > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 16:43:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E6710656C2 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0885A8FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E41130E29 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:42:57 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id sxWWg-f9dkg4 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:42:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1946D130E24 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:42:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:42:35 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314164235.GD9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <20080314015808.GC28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <20080314024839.GD28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <200803141026.50881.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bajzpZikUji1w+G9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803141026.50881.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:43:00 -0000 --bajzpZikUji1w+G9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said= , On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:50AM +0100: > On Friday 14 March 2008 03:48:39 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > > This One Time, at Band Camp, Wael Nasreddine said,= On=20 > Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:58:08AM +0100: > > > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel =20 > said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:08:43AM +0100: > > > > On Friday 14 March 2008 01:43:28 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > > > > > Anyway, I switched from Gentoo to FreeBSD like a month ago, I'm q= uite > > > > > happy with it, very stable very reliable, but I'm having trouble > > > > > installing azureus. Since it's a server, that doesn't even have a > > > > > monitor attached to it, I have no use for any X11 dependencies, so > > > > > I've added to make.conf > > > > > --------CUT > > > > > WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes > > > > > --------CUT > > > > Unfortunately, that switch isn't working as "I don't want anything > > > > pulled in that uses X11", but rather as "If this port can be built > > > > without X11, then I will obey that, otherwise I will go ahead and > > > > install X11". > > > > Maybe that's a project for next google's summer of code. > > > > Anyway, the port depends on x11-toolkits/swt, which is what pulls i= n X. > > > > If you know that azareus can be built without X, you could request > > > > support for it through the send-pr(1) mechanism, but it doesn't look > > > > like that'd be an easy job. > > > Oh that's too bad :S since I need it, I'll just install it with the X > > > dependencies... > > > Thanks anyway, I appreciate your help :) > > I'm having a problem compiling libXext, here's the log: > > --------CUT > > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for libXext-1.0.3,1 > > =3D=3D=3D> Extracting for libXext-1.0.3,1 > > =3D> MD5 Checksum OK for xorg/lib/libXext-1.0.3.tar.bz2. > > =3D> SHA256 Checksum OK for xorg/lib/libXext-1.0.3.tar.bz2. > > =3D=3D=3D> Patching for libXext-1.0.3,1 > > =3D=3D=3D> libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: > > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xextproto.pc - found =3D=3D=3D> libXext-= 1.0.3,1 > > depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/xproto.pc - found =3D=3D= =3D> =20 > > libXext-1.0.3,1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc - = not > > found =3D=3D=3D> Verifying install for /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/= x11.pc in > > /usr/ports/x11/libX11 =3D> No directory for > > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/x11.pc. Skipping..=20 > Well, here's the weird part. > Are you missing part of your ports tree? Like /usr/ports/x11/libX11? Yep that was the problem, everytime I ran 'portsnap fetch update', portsnap says the file is corrupted so I just emptied /usr/ports and /var/db/portsnap and did 'portsnap fetch extract' and now it seems fine... --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --bajzpZikUji1w+G9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2qr7VWU5RcjdGKIRAuS1AKDa29C1R6rFphUpoAQYFr1gLPhWQwCeMja1 N14zm4VYhRLXP3hDYnma9ls= =VmJH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bajzpZikUji1w+G9-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:00:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF611065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD048FC17 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEBEAAF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:00:05 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.5.3 (20071212) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZaoENRACjMHw for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:00:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (me.todoo.biz [82.66.93.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grego03) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 332C3AAA for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:00:05 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> From: bsd To: Liste FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Subject: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:00:06 -0000 Hello, I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to =20 make a : # potupgrade -fa Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated =20= ports. Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed =20= ports since I have updated my system? Thanks for your answer. =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD bsd @at@ todoo.biz =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF= =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF P "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing =20 this e-mail" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:01:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9081106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85C98FC17 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B041CDE4; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:01:48 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:08:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803141039.03096.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DA48C1.5010306@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <47DA48C1.5010306@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141208.57610.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:01:50 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 10:43:29 Leslie Jensen wrote: > > Ok, the error is generated by uic: > > ./src/tools/qmutex_unix.cpp: qWarning("Mutex unlock failure: %s", > > strerror(ret)); > > > > Which fails on pthread_mutex_unlock call. > > Could you show the output of: > > ldd /usr/local/bin/uic > > bsdpc01# ldd /usr/local/bin/uic > /usr/local/bin/uic: > libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x280d0000) > libmng.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x287b2000) > libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 (0x28813000) > libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x28832000) > libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x28857000) > libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x28869000) > libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x28871000) > libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x28879000) > libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x28880000) > libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x28889000) > libXft.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x2888c000) > libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x2889e000) > libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 > (0x2890c000) > libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28936000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28944000) > libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28a31000) > libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x28a39000) > libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x28a50000) > libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x28b45000) > libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x28b5a000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x28b65000) > libaudio.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x28c61000) > libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x28c77000) > liblcms.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x28cc7000) > libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x28cf7000) > libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x28cfc000) > libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x28d1c000) > libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x28d1f000) > librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x28d24000) > There's your problem. I don't see a libpthread or better on 7.x a libthr.so linked in: libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x38b55000) is what it shows on my 7.x system. So the question is, why isn't qt built with thread support. I don't see how that's possible with the current ports makefile. Do you have a file /lib/libthr.so*? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:02:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id ACA701065672; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:04 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080314170204.ACA701065672@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:04 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:04 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:02:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id B2BB71065674; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:04 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080314170204.B2BB71065674@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:04 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:02:04 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:04:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA08C106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8B28FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2EH4Vwn017192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:04:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <47DAB01E.6000403@tundraware.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:04:30 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List References: <47DA2131.9030006@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <47DA2131.9030006@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: 6.3 And VIA 8237S Controller - Also USB Drive Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:04:36 -0000 Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I just bought a new MSI P4M900M2 mobo. It works just fine with both > Windoze and SUSE Linux. When I tried booting 6.2 on it, it refused to > set the drive (ad0 - I tried several different drives) into the > higher speed UDMA modes. So, I downloaded 6.3, and it *seemed* to > be fine. The drives come up as UDMA 100 or UDMA 133. > > But ... under long disk operations - say untaring a 2G tarball > stored on a USB drive - I start to see this: > > ad0: WARNING WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC ERROR > I have resolved this and thought I'd share with the class in case anyone else runs into the problem. It occurred to me that this chipset has been around long enough that it was very likely not a driver problem. I went back and replaced the IDE cable with another one known to be good and, voila', problem solved. What's weird about this is that the "bad" cable is a more-or-less new low profile round IDE cable I got from Tiger Direct a while back. It is the 20" variety which may be contributing noise to the problem. Weirder still is that neither Linux nor Windows seemed to have problems with it, though I did not test as thoroughly with those OSs. I'd guess that the FBSD driver is perhaps trying to squeeze the last bit of optimization out of the controller and thus drives the IDE bus to its limits, hence the problem shows up there. Either that, or I just didn't pound on the machine hard enough with Linux especially to see the problem. I should have guessed "cable problem" right away, but given the relative newness of the cable, that seemed unlikely. In a related note: I also discovered that the FreeBSD install CD Fixit environment does flakey things when you try to untar a large file from a USB drive plugged in through an external hub. Plugging the drive directly into one of the mobo ports made that problem go away. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:05:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E51E1065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1038FC26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EH56AA093178; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:05:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314120359.025bb038@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:04:58 -0500 To: bsd , Liste FreeBSD From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> References: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080313-0, 03/13/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:05:55 -0000 At 11:59 AM 3/14/2008, bsd wrote: >Hello, > > >I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to >make a : > ># potupgrade -fa > > >Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated >ports. > > >Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed >ports since I have updated my system? > > > >Thanks for your answer. The libraries change extensively with version upgrades. That is why you should rebuild all your ports. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:12:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC171065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6F68FC23 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:12:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451B71CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:12:19 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:12:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> <20080314152553.GD19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <47DA9E42.4070702@dial.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <47DA9E42.4070702@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141812.17959.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Alex Zbyslaw , Modulok Subject: Re: /usr/local/www a tradition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:12:25 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 16:48:18 Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 07:29:55PM -0600, Modulok wrote: > > Is there a compelling reason for placing subversion and web-server > > data in /usr/local and not somewhere else? I was thinking of keeping > > all user accounts (human and daemon alike) in one place like, > > /home/www and /home/svn and so forth. > > > > Before I break convention, I just thought I'd see if placing said > > files in /usr/local was just a tradition or if there was another > > reason for it. > > Break the convention! > > Where apache or any other web server looks for its "home" is down to > *your* apache config. Different vhosts can look wherever they like for > their own homes and you can put them wherever you like - no need for > them to be in the same place at all. Depends a bit on the user's defenition of 'data'. For some, 'data' includes apps like phpMyAdmin, for some it doesn't. Anything installed by ports should remain in /usr/local. Self-respecting webservers support aliasing weblocations to physical directories, so in most cases it can be worked around. In the event you need multiple installations of the same webapp, either use jails or don't use the ports to install them (and then also don't put them in /usr/local). -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:12:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37328106569B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4598FC2A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EHBidN024660; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:11:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2EHBSQa024653; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:11:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:11:28 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Wael Nasreddine In-Reply-To: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Message-ID: <20080314181055.S24652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:12:35 -0000 > I have a server at home, I use it as a mail server, as well as P2P > instead of running P2P on my Laptop, I run it on the server and I just > use clients to control it... isn't azureus a torrent program. use rtorrent, it's text mode and is fast From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:15:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2362B106576C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@brianwhalen.net) Received: from numail.brianwhalen.net (dsl093-034-172.snd1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.34.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5C68FC18 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@brianwhalen.net) Received: by numail.brianwhalen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5D9DF2E04E; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by numail.brianwhalen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520A32E04C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:59:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314095710.S83410@numail.brianwhalen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: portsnap errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:15:15 -0000 Anyone else seeing corrupt snapshot errors on the portsnap servers? I tried a couple times and got the below. I didnt allow it to complete. Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching snapshot metadata... done. Updating from Thu Mar 13 06:10:47 PDT 2008 to Fri Mar 14 07:19:41 PDT 2008. Fetching 4 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 4 metadata files... gunzip: (stdin): unexpected end of file metadata is corrupt. Fetching 587 new ports or files... /usr/sbin/portsnap: cannot open 1fcb6a83f53e20e2efc4dda71489275f065f73eed6c16dc422287ca081232112.gz: No such file or directory snapshot is corrupt. Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:17:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810121065687 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (thenetnow.com [69.90.69.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA2A8FC2D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANT) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JaDWp-0000Bk-Ss; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:17:12 -0400 Message-ID: <017101c885f7$3dccd6f0$6501a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: "Christopher Sean Hilton" , "Jason Barnes" , References: <8FB78ABB-AE42-412C-8463-A03E18D6C462@vindaloo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:17:11 -0400 Organization: The Net Now MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Cc: Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:17:16 -0000 Yeah, what CHris said. Also, there is an option you can put in fstab to allow the automount, and background the NFS mounts ... so that if the mount fails the boot will continue. Again, as mentioned, this will only work if the OS and your connection method (ssh daemon?) are not dependant on the NFS mounts. Here is what my fstab looks like. Note line 6 that specifies the "-t=10,-b" options (to timeout the mount after 10 seconds and to background the nfs mount). # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/da0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1f /home ufs userquota,rw 0 2 /dev/da0s1d /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1e /var ufs rw 2 2 nfsserver:/mnt /mnt nfs -t=10,-b,rw 0 0 -Grant ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Sean Hilton" To: "Jason Barnes" Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 12:03 PM Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot > > On Mar 14, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Jason Barnes wrote: > >> Hi -- I'm running a "Tombstone" machine that's functioning as a >> server. The machine is located somewhere with a fast connection, and >> not somewhere that I have easy access to. As such, I want this >> machine to do its best to boot up and get onto the network, no matter >> what happens on boot, so that I have a chance to actually fix the >> problem. >> >> Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that >> some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It >> says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh >> single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly >> unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or >> not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. >> >> Is there a way that I can set the machine to do its best to boot no >> matter what it finds at boot time? Thanks in advance for any help you >> can provide, >> > > Depends on the whether or not the system needs something from the NFS > mount at boot time. If it doesn't then you would do well to use amd (man > 8 amd) to handle the mount. The short of is that amd automates the > process of mounting a filesystem by presenting a directory. When a > process requests a file within that directory amd performs the mount. Amd > helps by deferring the mount until something actually needs something > from the remote filesystem. > > Simpler still would be to change the mounts entry to noauto in /etc/ > fstab. However then you or someone else will have to perform the mount > when you need the filesystem. > > -- Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:19:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862A51065673 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akruijff@dds.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml11.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml11.kpnxchange.com [213.75.38.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2D88FC24 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akruijff@dds.nl) Received: from cpsmtp-eml104.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.84.104]) by hpsmtp-eml11.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:07:53 +0100 Received: from ip51cc8423.speed.planet.nl ([81.204.132.35]) by cpsmtp-eml104.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:07:53 +0100 Received: from Alex1.kruijff.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip51cc8423.speed.planet.nl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2EH7nNX002097; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:07:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from akruijff@dds.nl) Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Alex1.kruijff.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2EH7mho002096; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:07:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from akruijff@dds.nl) X-Authentication-Warning: Alex1.kruijff.org: akruijff set sender to akruijff@dds.nl using -f Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:07:47 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20080314170746.GA1076@Alex1.kruijff.org> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> <20080313211629.GB13059@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080313211629.GB13059@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2008 17:07:53.0195 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0B53BB0:01C885F5] Cc: Ghirai , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: akruijff@dds.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:19:58 -0000 On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:16:29PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:36:57PM +0200, Ghirai wrote: > > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:22 -0400 > > Robert Huff wrote: > > > > > > > > Ghirai writes: > > > > > > > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / > > > > > > Start with /tmp. > > > Also: > > > > > > du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 25 > > > > > > > > > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > > > > 986K /bin > > 512B /dev > > 366K /etc/rc.d > > 270K /lib/geom > > 250K /etc/mail > > 170K /libexec > > 138K /etc/ssh > > 137M / > > 121M /boot > > 118K /etc/periodic > > 116K /etc/defaults > > 112M /boot/kernel > > > > /tmp is ~2MiB. > > try doing a df -k to see what file systems are really > there and what they have in them. > Then go in to root (/) and do ls -laF > That may provide some clues. > This seams to be be a partial account of /. Try 'du -x / | grep \[\ 0-9\]*M' instead or 'du -shx /.[^.]* /*'. You can safely remove /boot/kernel/*.symbols -- Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:23:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95772106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4243E8FC28 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDE5130E28 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:23:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id i39CX7TgiWfF for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:22:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A73A8130DC8 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:22:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:22:44 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Message-ID: <20080314172244.GE9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <20080314181055.S24652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314181055.S24652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:23:06 -0000 --qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Wojciech Puchar said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:11:28PM +0100: >> I have a server at home, I use it as a mail server, as well as P2P >> instead of running P2P on my Laptop, I run it on the server and I just >> use clients to control it... > > isn't azureus a torrent program. > Yes it is. > use rtorrent, it's text mode and is fast > rtorrent is a fast text mode, but It has no WEB controller and no multiuser :S I require WEB Controler + Multiuser because my uncle uses my server to download torrents as his ISP filter P2P packets... Thanks. --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2rRkVWU5RcjdGKIRAoscAKC0F1uxKkOAvLRuB/Ob1y+Pv+LCZwCgrGB+ Erj16VNWa5GYHAwYRHuZan8= =hd+o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qFgkTsE6LiHkLPZw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:25:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07560106567E; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BE8FC13; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D741CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:25:11 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:25:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141825.10660.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Jason Barnes Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:13 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 16:24:57 Jason Barnes wrote: > Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that > some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It > says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh > single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly > unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or > not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. man mount_nfs(8), specifically -R, -b, -i and -s. And indeed omit the fsck check as said earlier. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:25:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07560106567E; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BE8FC13; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D741CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:25:11 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:25:10 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141825.10660.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Jason Barnes Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:25:13 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 16:24:57 Jason Barnes wrote: > Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that > some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It > says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh > single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly > unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or > not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. man mount_nfs(8), specifically -R, -b, -i and -s. And indeed omit the fsck check as said earlier. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:32:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5EC1065677 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B298FC25 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542871CD18; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:32:42 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:32:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:32:43 -0000 On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > Hello, > > I have this problem with apache 2.2.8, and I don't know the reason yet. > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 29 16:57:56 UTC 2008 > admin@BB.WeArab.Net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz K8-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > > Features=0xbfebfbffA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x641d > AMD Features=0x20100800 > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > usable memory = 2139377664 (2040 MB) > avail memory = 2064826368 (1969 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > cpu1: on acpi0 > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 > pci2: on pcib2 > em0: port > 0x9000-0x901f mem 0xf9020000-0xf903ffff,0xf9000000-0xf901ffff irq 18 at > device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:ba:51:8d > em0: [FILTER] > pcib3: at device 28.0 on pci0 > pci3: on pcib3 > vgapci0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem > 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 24 at device 2.0 on pci3 > pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 > pci4: on pcib4 > atapci0: port > 0xb000-0xb03f,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb800-0xb87f mem > 0xfd020000-0xfd020fff,0xfd000000-0xfd01ffff irq 23 at device 4.0 on pci4 > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > ata2: on atapci0 > ata2: [ITHREAD] > ata3: on atapci0 > ata3: [ITHREAD] > ata4: on atapci0 > ata4: [ITHREAD] > ata5: on atapci0 > ata5: [ITHREAD] > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci1: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f irq 18 at device 31.2 on > pci0 ata0: on atapci1 > ata0: [ITHREAD] > ata1: on atapci1 > ata1: [ITHREAD] > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio0: port may not be enabled > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio0: port may not be enabled > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > acpi0 sio0: type 16550A > sio0: [FILTER] > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > sio1: port may not be enabled > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > sio1: type 16550A > sio1: [FILTER] > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > ad0: 238475MB at ata0-master SATA150 > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 > ad6: 381554MB at ata3-master SATA150 > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > em0: link state changed to UP > pid 8458 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 82334 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 82374 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 82375 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 82423 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 82520 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when caught) */ If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache compilation, you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only program creating SIGILL? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:43:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9C61065680 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4918FC24 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E018130E2C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:43:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9VVnOcN3c4o7 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:43:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5EFEE130E2B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:43:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:42:50 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314174250.GF9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080314095710.S83410@numail.brianwhalen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O98KdSgI27dgYlM5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314095710.S83410@numail.brianwhalen.net> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: portsnap errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:43:11 -0000 --O98KdSgI27dgYlM5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Brian said, On Fri, Mar = 14, 2008 at 09:59:26AM -0700: > Anyone else seeing corrupt snapshot errors on the portsnap servers? I=20 > tried a couple times and got the below. I didnt allow it to complete. > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Thu Mar 13 06:10:47 PDT 2008 to Fri Mar 14 07:19:41 PDT 200= 8. > Fetching 4 metadata patches. done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 4 metadata files... gunzip: (stdin): unexpected end of file > metadata is corrupt. > > Fetching 587 new ports or files... /usr/sbin/portsnap: cannot open=20 > 1fcb6a83f53e20e2efc4dda71489275f065f73eed6c16dc422287ca081232112.gz: No= =20 > such file or directory > snapshot is corrupt. > > Brian I've had the same problem yesterday solved it with ---------CUT mv /usr/ports /usr/ports-old mv /var/db/portsnap /var/db/portsnap-old portsnap fetch extract mv /var/db/portsnap-old/distfiles/* /var/db/portsnap/distfiles/ ---------CUT You could probably remove the old folders later.... --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --O98KdSgI27dgYlM5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2rkaVWU5RcjdGKIRAhUrAKCIV12EGo3RuKSU1UHLZUPJ1aZ+OwCg6Ao7 ZZOxP60jSmNS/QaaAeGcNO0= =CH5f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O98KdSgI27dgYlM5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:50:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AEC1065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762EE8FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36906130E2E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:50:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id yCyIhCOliHZU for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:49:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 60F76130E2D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:49:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:49:41 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314174941.GG9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080314095710.S83410@numail.brianwhalen.net> <20080314174250.GF9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ulDeV4rPMk/y39in" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314174250.GF9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: portsnap errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:50:02 -0000 --ulDeV4rPMk/y39in Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Wael Nasreddine said, On = Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:42:50PM +0100: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Brian said, On Fri, Ma= r 14, 2008 at 09:59:26AM -0700: > > Anyone else seeing corrupt snapshot errors on the portsnap servers? I= =20 > > tried a couple times and got the below. I didnt allow it to complete. > > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap3.FreeBSD.org... done. > > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > > Updating from Thu Mar 13 06:10:47 PDT 2008 to Fri Mar 14 07:19:41 PDT 2= 008. > > Fetching 4 metadata patches. done. > > Applying metadata patches... done. > > Fetching 4 metadata files... gunzip: (stdin): unexpected end of file > > metadata is corrupt. > > Fetching 587 new ports or files... /usr/sbin/portsnap: cannot open=20 > > 1fcb6a83f53e20e2efc4dda71489275f065f73eed6c16dc422287ca081232112.gz: No= =20 > > such file or directory > > snapshot is corrupt. > > Brian > I've had the same problem yesterday solved it with > ---------CUT > mv /usr/ports /usr/ports-old > mv /var/db/portsnap /var/db/portsnap-old > portsnap fetch extract > mv /var/db/portsnap-old/distfiles/* /var/db/portsnap/distfiles/ > ---------CUT > You could probably remove the old folders later.... Oops sorry I've made a mistake above, the command > mv /var/db/portsnap-old/distfiles/* /var/db/portsnap/distfiles/ Should be mv /usr/ports-old/distfiles/* /usr/ports/distfiles/ Sorry :$ --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --ulDeV4rPMk/y39in Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2rq1VWU5RcjdGKIRAh5bAKCOqLSpRbCb4colXpH93Xqv14WkgQCfaNyk Zl1W2fCYz/rrlQqpnW6XSdI= =oyqb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ulDeV4rPMk/y39in-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:56:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927D1106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC778FC26 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A051C130E2F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:56:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id iLTy999lHWvm for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:56:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E4E0C130E2E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:56:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:55:46 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:56:13 -0000 --QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said= , On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:32:40PM +0100: > On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > Hello, > > I have this problem with apache 2.2.8, and I don't know the reason yet. > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 29 16:57:56 UTC 2008 > > admin@BB.WeArab.Net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB > > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz K8-class CPU) > > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf41 Stepping =3D 1 > > Features=3D0xbfebfbff >A,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > Features2=3D0x641d > > AMD Features=3D0x20100800 > > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > usable memory =3D 2139377664 (2040 MB) > > avail memory =3D 2064826368 (1969 MB) > > ACPI APIC Table: > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 > > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > > acpi0: on motherboard > > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > > acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed > > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > > cpu1: on acpi0 > > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > pci0: on pcib0 > > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > > pci1: on pcib1 > > pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 > > pci2: on pcib2 > > em0: port > > 0x9000-0x901f mem 0xf9020000-0xf903ffff,0xf9000000-0xf901ffff irq 18 at > > device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:ba:51:8d > > em0: [FILTER] > > pcib3: at device 28.0 on pci0 > > pci3: on pcib3 > > vgapci0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem > > 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 24 at device 2.0 on pci3 > > pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) > > pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) > > pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) > > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > > pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 > > pci4: on pcib4 > > atapci0: port > > 0xb000-0xb03f,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb800-0xb87f mem > > 0xfd020000-0xfd020fff,0xfd000000-0xfd01ffff irq 23 at device 4.0 on pci4 > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > ata2: on atapci0 > > ata2: [ITHREAD] > > ata3: on atapci0 > > ata3: [ITHREAD] > > ata4: on atapci0 > > ata4: [ITHREAD] > > ata5: on atapci0 > > ata5: [ITHREAD] > > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > > isa0: on isab0 > > atapci1: port > > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f irq 18 at device 31.2= on > > pci0 ata0: on atapci1 > > ata0: [ITHREAD] > > ata1: on atapci1 > > ata1: [ITHREAD] > > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > > acpi0 sio0: type 16550A > > sio0: [FILTER] > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > > sio1: type 16550A > > sio1: [FILTER] > > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 > > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > kbd0 at atkbd0 > > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on is= a0 > > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > ad0: 238475MB at ata0-master SATA150 > > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 > > ad6: 381554MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > > em0: link state changed to UP > > pid 8458 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 82334 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 82374 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 82375 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 82423 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 82520 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when caught)= */ > If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache compilat= ion,=20 > you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only program creating=20 > SIGILL? I'm having a similar issue, ny dmesg is filled with -------- CUT pid 63364 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 -------- CUT my /etc/make.conf: -------- CUT CFLAGS+=3D"-march=3Dpentium4" WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes # Use Perl with threads WITH_THREADS=3Dyes # added by use.perl 2008-03-13 22:04:11 PERL_VER=3D5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=3D5.8.8 -------- CUT what could be the problem... --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2rwiVWU5RcjdGKIRAgKbAJ4/kGy+5XCbEcMlFX4XhX/qaYAuJwCgmlHL TgIU+W9oAfJ/OxHVqjcnIn0= =czkF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 17:57:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F12106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itz@mushinsky.net) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188348FC1B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itz@mushinsky.net) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so4480925mue.6 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.167.12 with SMTP id p12mr31654123hue.8.1205517431211; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.139.1 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:57:11 -0400 From: "Isaac Mushinsky" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: SATA problems (Abit IP35-Pro) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:57:13 -0000 I am setting up a new system with Abit IP35-Pro (ich9r), 2 WD SATA drives on the controller. There is also a SATA DVDRW to boot from. With the default SATA setup (SATA/IDE) the system cannot find any SATA drive. I was able to boot the install disk, attaching an old IDE CDROM, but still could not make it see the hard drive. If I set SATA controller to AHCI, the system boots (although with some ACPI errors), and I was able to install. However, fdisk thinks that the geometry is "incorrect", and insists on a different one (it says the drives have 476gb rather than 500gb). I can install with this AHCI setup, but have no idea what the implications are. Is there a known fix for SATA/IDE? Or is AHCI better? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 18:15:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBA9106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:15:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2D38FC12 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so4856525fka.11 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:15:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Bv8le+Fr+K0oEvAlmG4RqKJhhm3zNOAoBkbEgByvI4I=; b=XLXu/YXlrbFcKNH5ZISRkNKuumZh/wqxXDs7y7AdHlKmXrDpelBtV+OyxkqvUTzNryqmpkApYq9nZIPMGXYu2SiI7Oro54VFhY8GjHe9Idr2y7wzzEacBnFSskql/EaWTuIP/pm+UmHtEd6s3Ks/b/SceRcN2i/dLfegU5Ux35w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KhKp45bzbLAMeO3Mbtl3UCvyIS5vna5L7olEzvNdmy1o0g3maEGx+qnYvVBzNC/Zh5XGe+u6i3UUfMgPWVyH3IegTZo7a0wRufk0yDipf0Cu1CWVQbM3W/flAtw13XB9chyoezXIK7WsfdCNKG6Mrvh1RKmkqyZs4Z+/hLYfKNA= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr27166016buf.38.1205518500002; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.160.5 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0803141114y1b1c73beh7a8f8d1b3815c6a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:14:59 -0700 From: "Kevin Downey" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:15:02 -0000 I had a similar problem. I fixed it my commenting out one of the extensions listed in /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini I forgot which one. I currently have three of them commented out: #extension=mcrypt.so #extension=mbstring.so #extension=mhash.so On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Wael Nasreddine wrote: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:32:40PM +0100: > > > > On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have this problem with apache 2.2.8, and I don't know the reason yet. > > > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 29 16:57:56 UTC 2008 > > > admin@BB.WeArab.Net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB > > > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz K8-class CPU) > > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > > > > Features=0xbfebfbff > >A,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > > Features2=0x641d > > > AMD Features=0x20100800 > > > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > > usable memory = 2139377664 (2040 MB) > > > avail memory = 2064826368 (1969 MB) > > > ACPI APIC Table: > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > > ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 > > > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > > > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > > > acpi0: on motherboard > > > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > > > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > > > acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed > > > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > > > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 > > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > > > cpu1: on acpi0 > > > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > > pci0: on pcib0 > > > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > > > pci1: on pcib1 > > > pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 > > > pci2: on pcib2 > > > em0: port > > > 0x9000-0x901f mem 0xf9020000-0xf903ffff,0xf9000000-0xf901ffff irq 18 at > > > device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:ba:51:8d > > > em0: [FILTER] > > > pcib3: at device 28.0 on pci0 > > > pci3: on pcib3 > > > vgapci0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem > > > 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 24 at device 2.0 on pci3 > > > pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) > > > pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) > > > pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) > > > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > > > pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 > > > pci4: on pcib4 > > > atapci0: port > > > 0xb000-0xb03f,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb800-0xb87f mem > > > 0xfd020000-0xfd020fff,0xfd000000-0xfd01ffff irq 23 at device 4.0 on pci4 > > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > > ata2: on atapci0 > > > ata2: [ITHREAD] > > > ata3: on atapci0 > > > ata3: [ITHREAD] > > > ata4: on atapci0 > > > ata4: [ITHREAD] > > > ata5: on atapci0 > > > ata5: [ITHREAD] > > > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > > > isa0: on isab0 > > > atapci1: port > > > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f irq 18 at device 31.2 on > > > pci0 ata0: on atapci1 > > > ata0: [ITHREAD] > > > ata1: on atapci1 > > > ata1: [ITHREAD] > > > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > > > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > > > acpi0 sio0: type 16550A > > > sio0: [FILTER] > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > > > sio1: type 16550A > > > sio1: [FILTER] > > > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 > > > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > > > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > > kbd0 at atkbd0 > > > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > > > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > > > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 > > > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > > ad0: 238475MB at ata0-master SATA150 > > > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 > > > ad6: 381554MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > > > em0: link state changed to UP > > > pid 8458 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 82334 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 82374 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 82375 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 82423 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 82520 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when caught) */ > > > If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache compilation, > > you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only program creating > > SIGILL? > > I'm having a similar issue, ny dmesg is filled with > -------- CUT > pid 63364 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 > -------- CUT > > my /etc/make.conf: > -------- CUT > CFLAGS+="-march=pentium4" > WITHOUT_X11=yes > WITHOUT_JAVA=yes > > # Use Perl with threads > WITH_THREADS=yes > > # added by use.perl 2008-03-13 22:04:11 > > PERL_VER=5.8.8 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > -------- CUT > > what could be the problem... > > > -- > Wael Nasreddine > http://wael.nasreddine.com > PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 > > .: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, > would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. > -- The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of personal relationships. Fisheye From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 18:23:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91B21065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Received: from mail2.techvalley.ca (mail2.techvalley.ca [66.199.130.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFA48FC1E for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.techvalley.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25198440058 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:06:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at techvalley.ca Received: from mail2.techvalley.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.techvalley.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id af9tPHzyTQP6 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.techvalley.ca (S0106000ea62b0175.vs.shawcable.net [24.85.105.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.techvalley.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD30B440055 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 03:06:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monsoon2.techvalley.ca ([192.168.1.1]) by mail.techvalley.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EI7F75021840 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:07:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Message-Id: <200803141807.m2EI7F75021840@mail.techvalley.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:06:30 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Tech Valley Internet - Tony Kivits Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: Virtualized FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:23:13 -0000 Hello All, I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized. Given a choice, I would rather use FreeBSD because of the ease of use of keeping the ports current. I am just wondering if anyone has used the virtualized FreeBSD in a producton environment and if so what are the pros and cons? Thanks, Tony Kivits, i-Net+ Network Administrator Tech Valley Internet Solutions www.TechValley.ca 778.892.5251 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 18:26:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5F81065675 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1288FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EIQ8ip077662; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:26:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daleco.biz Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ezekiel.daleco.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0giHSvxbpjgH; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:26:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from archangel.daleco.biz (dsl.daleco.biz [209.125.108.70]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EIPwqf077657; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:25:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <47DAC330.3040506@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:25:52 -0500 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20080213 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mla@nasreddine.com References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> In-Reply-To: <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 11 (was signal 4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:26:09 -0000 Wael Nasreddine wrote: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:32:40PM +0100: >> On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: >>> pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>> pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>> pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>> pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > >> #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when caught) */ > >> If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache compilation, >> you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only program creating >> SIGILL? > > I'm having a similar issue, ny dmesg is filled with > -------- CUT > pid 63364 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 > -------- CUT > > my /etc/make.conf: > -------- CUT > CFLAGS+="-march=pentium4" > WITHOUT_X11=yes > WITHOUT_JAVA=yes > > # Use Perl with threads > WITH_THREADS=yes > > # added by use.perl 2008-03-13 22:04:11 > PERL_VER=5.8.8 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > -------- CUT > > what could be the problem... Well, first, signal 11 isn't signal 4, so the problem isn't very *closely* related, but I'll bite anyway. That said, I've little idea what could be causing your httpd to die with sig 11. In my experience, signal 11s are generally caused by incompatible modules (*.so) loading along with httpd during Apache startup. PHP, in particular, after a portupgrade. Any resemblance to your situation? Kevin Kinsey -- Marry in haste and everyone starts counting the months. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 18:29:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2DF106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1514D8FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EISfKv025773; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:28:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2EISUJo025770; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:28:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:28:30 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Isaac Mushinsky In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080314192711.T25768@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA problems (Abit IP35-Pro) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:29:32 -0000 > errors), and I was able to install. However, fdisk thinks that the geometry > is "incorrect", and insists on a different one (it says the drives have > 476gb rather than 500gb). it says true. 500 billion bytes which is about 465GB - standard marketing trick today. it's all right > > I can install with this AHCI setup, but have no idea what the implications > are. Is there a known fix for SATA/IDE? Or is AHCI better? use AHCI if you can. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 18:30:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F281065678 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97598FC22 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) X-Trace: 63579330/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$INTERNET-ACCEPTED/None/62.31.10.181 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 62.31.10.181 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: xfb52@dial.pipex.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgABAM9g2kc+Hwq1/2dsb2JhbAAIqic X-IP-Direction: OUT Received: from 62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (HELO [192.168.23.2]) ([62.31.10.181]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2008 18:30:04 +0000 Message-ID: <47DAC420.3090806@dial.pipex.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:29:52 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Isaac Mushinsky References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA problems (Abit IP35-Pro) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:30:06 -0000 Isaac Mushinsky wrote: >If I set SATA controller to AHCI, the system boots (although with some ACPI >errors), and I was able to install. However, fdisk thinks that the geometry >is "incorrect", and insists on a different one > Sysinstall nearly always says this, and undoubtedly sysinstall is nearly* always correct. Ignore it and move on. >(it says the drives have >476gb rather than 500gb). > Manufacturers like to make their disks look bigger by using 1000 instead of 1024 when scaling Kb to Gb so: 476 Gb * 1024 * 1024 = 499122176K bytes 500 "Gb" * 1000 * 1000 = 500000000K bytes which is near as dammit the same. --Alex *In ten years of FreeBSD I have seen the warning many times, and seen people asking about the warning many, many, many times. What I never remember seeing is any case where someone needed to do anything about that warning. That doesn't prove anything (my memory is of unknown reliability), but you have my word that it's not *that* bad :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 18:41:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F091065674 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itz@mushinsky.net) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AFF8FC13 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itz@mushinsky.net) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so4504537mue.6 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.147.6 with SMTP id u6mr31658946hud.13.1205520059878; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.139.1 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:40:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:40:59 -0400 From: "Isaac Mushinsky" To: "Alex Zbyslaw" In-Reply-To: <47DAC420.3090806@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47DAC420.3090806@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA problems (Abit IP35-Pro) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:41:07 -0000 On 3/14/08, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > > Isaac Mushinsky wrote: > > >If I set SATA controller to AHCI, the system boots (although with some > ACPI > >errors), and I was able to install. However, fdisk thinks that the > geometry > >is "incorrect", and insists on a different one > > > Sysinstall nearly always says this, and undoubtedly sysinstall is > nearly* always correct. Ignore it and move on. > > >(it says the drives have > >476gb rather than 500gb). > > > Manufacturers like to make their disks look bigger by using 1000 instead > of 1024 when scaling Kb to Gb so: > > 476 Gb * 1024 * 1024 = 499122176K bytes > > 500 "Gb" * 1000 * 1000 = 500000000K bytes > > which is near as dammit the same. > > --Alex > > *In ten years of FreeBSD I have seen the warning many times, and seen > people asking about the warning many, many, many times. What I never > remember seeing is any case where someone needed to do anything about > that warning. That doesn't prove anything (my memory is of unknown > reliability), but you have my word that it's not *that* bad :-) > > > > Thanks. I thought so about the size, just wondered whether there is anything wrong with the geometry warning. I don't remember encountering it before. Although I use FreeBSD since 2.x, my last sysinstall was many years ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 19:21:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D361065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+UA=44817438@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBB68FC1A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+UA=44817438@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85C3163F81 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:54:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22722D05A8 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:54:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:54:53 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314185453.2758ed44@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> References: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:21:57 -0000 On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100 bsd wrote: > Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my > installed ports since I have updated my system? In the long term it's a good idea to do it, but there's no hurry unless you see a specific library problem. You could just install misc/compat5x, wait a bit and then do a portupgrade -f '<2008-03-14' when most ports have been updated anyway. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 19:29:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236AE106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DWassman@etgroup.net) Received: from mail3.etgroup.net (mail3.etgroup.net [66.195.99.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F054F8FC1F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DWassman@etgroup.net) Received: from mail2.etgroup.net (66.195.99.231) by etg6.etg.local (66.195.99.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:29:38 -0500 Received: from mail.etgroup.net ([66.195.99.210]) by mail2.etgroup.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:29:38 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:30:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B038755C3@etg2.etg.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: thread-topic: RE: interactive stop on boot thread-index: AciF9b6uzbUZ32ozQM+kZAFpg5MJLgAEvFPA From: David Wassman To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2008 19:29:38.0560 (UTC) FILETIME=[BE4CF000:01C88609] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:29:39 -0000 Jason, If there isn't anything needed from the NFS mounts, you can add intr,soft options to the /etc/fstab for each NFS share. Intr allows you to interrupt the NFS process with CTRL-C. You may not be available to do this, but you could call a user to do it. Soft allows the NFS client to fail, instead of hang.=20 Or you could just delete the entries or have them noauto. Also, verify that the dump and pass# are set to zero. At least pass#, as if it is any other number, the background fschk will try to run and hang if not available (not ideal to run fschk on NFS mounts anyway) Hope this helps. David Wassman Message: 13 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:24:57 -0700 From: "Jason Barnes" Subject: interactive stop on boot To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 Hi -- I'm running a "Tombstone" machine that's functioning as a server. The machine is located somewhere with a fast connection, and not somewhere that I have easy access to. As such, I want this machine to do its best to boot up and get onto the network, no matter what happens on boot, so that I have a chance to actually fix the problem. Lately when it boots it runs into an NFS mounting error, claiming that some of my NFS-mounted drives have unexpected inconsistencies. It says "unexpected error - help!" and then quits to a /bin/sh single-user-mode prompt. As I am 10 miles away, this is decidedly unhelpful. I don't care if it can't mount some irrelevant drive or not; I want it to boot up and ask me questions later. Is there a way that I can set the machine to do its best to boot no matter what it finds at boot time? Thanks in advance for any help you can provide, - Jason PS -- Boot messages not available, as the machine is down at the moment and I can't get over there to type " exit" until later this afternoon. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 19:41:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4246106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFDA8FC1A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323A4130E3B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:41:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id pbPfmjPiMmEo for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:41:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EAC89130E3A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:41:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:41:10 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314194109.GI9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <47DAC330.3040506@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47DAC330.3040506@daleco.biz> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 11 (was signal 4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:41:34 -0000 --a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Kevin Kinsey said, On Fri, Ma= r 14, 2008 at 01:25:52PM -0500: > Wael Nasreddine wrote: >> This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel = =20 >> said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:32:40PM +0100: >>> On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: >>>> pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>>> pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>>> pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>>> pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 >>> #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when caugh= t)=20 >>> */ >>> If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache=20 >>> compilation, you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only=20 >>> program creating SIGILL? >> I'm having a similar issue, ny dmesg is filled with >> -------- CUT >> pid 63364 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 >> -------- CUT >> my /etc/make.conf: >> -------- CUT >> CFLAGS+=3D"-march=3Dpentium4" >> WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes >> WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes >> # Use Perl with threads >> WITH_THREADS=3Dyes >> # added by use.perl 2008-03-13 22:04:11 >> PERL_VER=3D5.8.8 >> PERL_VERSION=3D5.8.8 >> -------- CUT >> what could be the problem... > > Well, first, signal 11 isn't signal 4, so the > problem isn't very *closely* related, but I'll > bite anyway. > Sorry for being off-topic I thought the solution would be almost the same or he could try whatever solution proposed to both of us, anyway sorry again :$ > That said, I've little idea what could be > causing your httpd to die with sig 11. In > my experience, signal 11s are generally caused > by incompatible modules (*.so) loading along > with httpd during Apache startup. PHP, in > particular, after a portupgrade. Any resemblance > to your situation? > Actuallly it's a fresh 7.0-RELEASE Installation, So I don't think a module might be broken unless it's a bug. > Kevin Kinsey --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2tTVVWU5RcjdGKIRAv6lAJ98V5FDfKrf1s6MTyQVKl/AAqtZ7ACfevL3 RzTeNoQLucvagijMxFKUY/A= =t4q8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a7XSrSxqzVsaECgU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 19:42:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F3A1065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3567A8FC2F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A00130E3B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:42:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 9xYiA5jpDgEK for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CB06F130E3A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:42:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:42:03 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314194203.GJ9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <1d3ed48c0803141114y1b1c73beh7a8f8d1b3815c6a4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VSaCG/zfRnOiPJtU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d3ed48c0803141114y1b1c73beh7a8f8d1b3815c6a4@mail.gmail.com> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:42:30 -0000 --VSaCG/zfRnOiPJtU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Kevin Downey said, On Fri,= Mar 14, 2008 at 11:14:59AM -0700: > I had a similar problem. I fixed it my commenting out one of the > extensions listed in /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini > I forgot which one. I currently have three of them commented out: > #extension=3Dmcrypt.so > #extension=3Dmbstring.so > #extension=3Dmhash.so I have commented the same modules that you have... I will try with it this way and see if it happens again... Thanks > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Wael Nasreddine wr= ote: > > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel = said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:32:40PM +0100: > > > On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have this problem with apache 2.2.8, and I don't know the reason= yet. > > > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 29 16:57:56 UTC 2008 > > > > admin@BB.WeArab.Net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB > > > > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz K8-class CPU) > > > > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf41 Stepping =3D 1 > > > > Features=3D0xbfebfbff > > >A,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > > > Features2=3D0x641d > > > > AMD Features=3D0x20100800 > > > > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > > > usable memory =3D 2139377664 (2040 MB) > > > > avail memory =3D 2064826368 (1969 MB) > > > > ACPI APIC Table: > > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > > > ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 > > > > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > > > > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > > > > acpi0: on motherboard > > > > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > > > > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > > > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > > > > acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed > > > > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > > > > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acp= i0 > > > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > > > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > > > > cpu1: on acpi0 > > > > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > > > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > > > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > > > pci0: on pcib0 > > > > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > > > > pci1: on pcib1 > > > > pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 > > > > pci2: on pcib2 > > > > em0: port > > > > 0x9000-0x901f mem 0xf9020000-0xf903ffff,0xf9000000-0xf901ffff irq = 18 at > > > > device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:ba:51:8d > > > > em0: [FILTER] > > > > pcib3: at device 28.0 on pci0 > > > > pci3: on pcib3 > > > > vgapci0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem > > > > 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 24 at device 2.0 o= n pci3 > > > > pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) > > > > pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) > > > > pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) > > > > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > > > > pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 > > > > pci4: on pcib4 > > > > atapci0: port > > > > 0xb000-0xb03f,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb800-0xb87f mem > > > > 0xfd020000-0xfd020fff,0xfd000000-0xfd01ffff irq 23 at device 4.0 o= n pci4 > > > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > > > ata2: on atapci0 > > > > ata2: [ITHREAD] > > > > ata3: on atapci0 > > > > ata3: [ITHREAD] > > > > ata4: on atapci0 > > > > ata4: [ITHREAD] > > > > ata5: on atapci0 > > > > ata5: [ITHREAD] > > > > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > > > > isa0: on isab0 > > > > atapci1: port > > > > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f irq 18 at device= 31.2 on > > > > pci0 ata0: on atapci1 > > > > ata0: [ITHREAD] > > > > ata1: on atapci1 > > > > ata1: [ITHREAD] > > > > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > > > > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > > > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x= 10 on > > > > acpi0 sio0: type 16550A > > > > sio0: [FILTER] > > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > > > > sio1: type 16550A > > > > sio1: [FILTER] > > > > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 > > > > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > > > > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > > > kbd0 at atkbd0 > > > > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > > > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > > > > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > > > > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff = on isa0 > > > > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > > > ad0: 238475MB at ata0-master SATA150 > > > > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA150 > > > > ad6: 381554MB at ata3-master SATA150 > > > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > > > > em0: link state changed to UP > > > > pid 8458 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 82334 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 82374 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 82375 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 82423 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 82520 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when ca= ught) */ > > > If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache com= pilation, > > > you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only program creati= ng > > > SIGILL? > > I'm having a similar issue, ny dmesg is filled with > > -------- CUT > > pid 63364 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 > > -------- CUT > > my /etc/make.conf: > > -------- CUT > > CFLAGS+=3D"-march=3Dpentium4" > > WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes > > WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes > > # Use Perl with threads > > WITH_THREADS=3Dyes > > # added by use.perl 2008-03-13 22:04:11 > > PERL_VER=3D5.8.8 > > PERL_VERSION=3D5.8.8 > > -------- CUT > > what could be the problem... > > -- > > Wael Nasreddine > > http://wael.nasreddine.com > > PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 > > .: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, > > would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --VSaCG/zfRnOiPJtU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2tULVWU5RcjdGKIRAp3mAKCayOP8fHRYL7HN+qOW3+VFxPhORQCfVvXB /tyy1To6FkD5fgOyiTtdoro= =SOoG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VSaCG/zfRnOiPJtU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 19:51:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A331065676 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DWassman@etgroup.net) Received: from mail3.etgroup.net (mail3.etgroup.net [66.195.99.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9E8FC19 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DWassman@etgroup.net) Received: from mail2.etgroup.net (66.195.99.231) by etg6.etg.local (66.195.99.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:51:50 -0500 Received: from mail.etgroup.net ([66.195.99.210]) by mail2.etgroup.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:51:50 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:52:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B038755E1@etg2.etg.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: thread-topic: Sync or Soft Updates or gjournal for fileserver thread-index: AciGBmCdlzaX1RFKTqm68e2/LVUSYwABotVA From: David Wassman To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Mar 2008 19:51:50.0633 (UTC) FILETIME=[D8472590:01C8860C] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Sync or Soft Updates or gjournal for fileserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:51:51 -0000 All, Here is the system specs: OS: FreeBSD-amd64 7.0-Release Processors: 2 Intel Xeon 5400 Quads Storage: ~438 GB RAID 5 (LSI 85016E & 4 Seagate 15K Cheetahs) My question is with this setup (Have not assembled or installed yet), for a fileserver running Samba to share in mixed environment, what would be better, sync, soft updates or gjournal. From my understanding, sync is the most secure as far as data integrity but suffers from performance. Soft Updates is a mix between the two but from reading Lucas's Absolute FreeBSD, he says that it is best for drives under 80GB. Gjournal sounds like the answer but it is new and from my understand still considered experimental. As a file server, I would like to keep snapshots for quick recovery of files but if I am not mistaken this requires Soft Updates (I have additional backups, but I would like to run them off snapshots to keep the system available). Does gjournal support snapshots as well? Will Soft Updates work fine with this setup? This is for a production environment (it is replacing a Windows 2000 fileserver), so would sync be the best bet to ensure data integrity over the benefits of soft updates and gjournal?=20 I have a fair amount of experience with FreeBSD (5+ years) and would normally just use Soft Updates but with the size of the storage involved, new features in 7, and both data integrity and performance being a concern, I am just not sure which would be best here.=20 Any advice would be helpful.=20 David Wassman, MCP Net+ IT Network Administrator Davis, Monk & Company (800) 344-5034 (352) 372-6300 (352) 375-1583 FAX The information contained in this electronic message is legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Davis, Monk & Company (352) 372-6300 and delete this communication immediately without reading it, making any copies of it or distributing it. =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 20:02:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824C4106566C for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE038FC1F for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4655802waf.3 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=jqBl7fi5EJAof89TqFV7zGYFM97p95Dv1PH/vVP2vfo=; b=H54reTN81DVJNCrkf2rWcLg9Y0ubuXyrlgVobT8oCA5jjNECOoHtKKzCfkHD7syuvd4W8L32hGtq6UaBllcQC1DeZqVcym78EyhSfb0jj0sZTNe5JXrpXE+ggUoAOg4/A4OlXVwbakeEcp9z8nOYTT+ABgF2erKthkbOqZ4u6MI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=BbktS6hFQpsQodMYHIiJW+UOJsv5Pc1c/g1rUeTsPqSwjFNpVO/X8CNkk/XI8A7f1pgDaaCvN/jsjglk+UEyydTLwPo3zJE06SmlhXJuz1Uuc1ATSEtL0RweF9m2JNe2qJXk6AzIsmia1XrJpSu+/6XuO3PCiBZWY2nav6LCFOo= Received: by 10.114.107.19 with SMTP id f19mr12595023wac.113.1205524945725; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.15 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540803141302w66629dddj51b35691adfb8f40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:02:25 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "FreeBSD Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [slightly off topic] Users of tikiwiki (on this list), question about the editors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:02:36 -0000 Hi, I'm looking at possibly using tikiwiki. First off, does anyone here use it? Second, if so, is there a WYSIWYG editor for editing pages in it? I'm very curious to know about that. I've used wiki's before and for my church, I don't think many who would keep content on the site would like to use syntax like: +++ item 1 +++ item 2 etc. (The above is from memory, it's been quite a while and I didn't use it much.) Are there management interfaces that present users with rich text editors and they simply type what they want and the editor translates it to wiki? Thanks, Andy -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 20:17:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B011106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:17:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55B98FC15 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:17:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pisymbol@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e11so2882258rng.7 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:17:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=0lqgAHMh+M6jnOjFJMQAjgmXJRvZ3zTPiOUzIvdz5r4=; b=jVho2purZPyV+68rp1nzFSLZYRjsvfDlLeHPeJZEzYZrnIrD0jeheDfk4U8kJysqzG39uyc0d5fPT6hqZin2DONSQPbtoctexy86Pc0sE1BRjCtOr3wbP2WqvhKE2s4WO4SdRNv6ob9GtyZKiUNVbn+UrX8PE+VXiwIUc5kQMd8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DjfAkGkTbMZ8XWX5Fmijsg1HeVvG2Dro2PfKHt7GmHW4CBz5uzBig6MDkBkjkC1VCwaJZlVDYfgJhfamgb9d5Q7t5HlcnEKczAE+mUar7JYtBKYmKBhaCLhMEqEwb3DAzsZDSHfVZGhiSojizmEFMrYD9a4x9HrWUXikwESTx28= Received: by 10.150.203.8 with SMTP id a8mr6558509ybg.125.1205525873061; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.230.16 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3c0b01820803141317u2a04047axd51c8594bc846f7b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:17:52 -0400 From: "Alexander Sack" To: "Isaac Mushinsky" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SATA problems (Abit IP35-Pro) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:17:54 -0000 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Isaac Mushinsky wrote: > > I can install with this AHCI setup, but have no idea what the implications > are. Is there a known fix for SATA/IDE? Or is AHCI better? If you can you should set it to AHCI which is a true native SATA mode instead of IDE emulation. AHCI is a true SATA hardware interface that exposes a fully featured protocol stack (NCQ, hot-plug, staggered spin-up etc.). Without it, you revert back to classical IDE over a SATA phy which doesn't really slow down the physical connection but adds a lot of driver overhead, i.e. by treating it as an IDE device, the driver performs a lot of unnecessary I/O access such as having to select the drive even though its point-to-point ("serial"), etc. -aps -- "What lies behind us and what lies in front of us is of little concern to what lies within us." -Ralph Waldo Emerson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 20:34:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635FB1065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C9D8FC13 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4DADD2845B; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:34:09 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:34:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> (bsd@todoo.biz's message of "Fri\, 14 Mar 2008 17\:59\:30 +0100") Message-ID: <443aqtm4e6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:34:10 -0000 bsd writes: > I have updated from 5.5 to 6.3 and wanted to know if It advisable to > make a : > > # potupgrade -fa > > > Knowing that I have kept my port tree up to date and have no outdated > ports. > > > Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my installed > ports since I have updated my system? Eventually, yes. Make sure you do it before you add or update any of yourinstalled ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 20:37:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2CD106567A for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:37:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E952F8FC22 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id E91D72845C; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:37:57 -0400 (EDT) To: RW References: <8DF93739-474C-4206-BD82-370160CBC0A6@todoo.biz> <20080314185453.2758ed44@gumby.homeunix.com.> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:37:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080314185453.2758ed44@gumby.homeunix.com.> (RW's message of "Fri\, 14 Mar 2008 18\:54\:53 +0000") Message-ID: <44y78lkpne.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -fa after system upgrade from 5.5 to 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:37:59 -0000 RW writes: > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:59:30 +0100 > bsd wrote: > > >> Simply put, the question is: should I force recompile all my >> installed ports since I have updated my system? > > In the long term it's a good idea to do it, but there's no hurry > unless you see a specific library problem. You could just install > misc/compat5x, wait a bit and then do a portupgrade -f '<2008-03-14' > when most ports have been updated anyway. The problem with that advice is that it's extremely likely to result in some ports getting linked against some libraries from 5 and some from 6, which will probably result in them breaking. It's a much better idea to do everything at once in dependency order, before doing any other kind of port upgrades (or adding new ports, for that matter). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 20:58:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1101065672 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from server1.nasreddine.com (server1.nasreddine.com [82.225.70.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711C08FC14 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mla@nasreddine.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DADC130E42 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:58:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nasreddine.com Received: from server1.nasreddine.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cadmus.nasreddine.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lusgs1z2ilBx for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:58:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from phoenix.nasreddine.info (phoenix.nasreddine.info [192.168.1.3]) by server1.nasreddine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0732D130E41 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:58:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:57:44 +0100 From: Wael Nasreddine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080314205744.GK9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <264730.93904.qm@web33705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200803141832.41139.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20080314175546.GH9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <1d3ed48c0803141114y1b1c73beh7a8f8d1b3815c6a4@mail.gmail.com> <20080314194203.GJ9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kswDJesP0akhmDn8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314194203.GJ9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> X-OS: Linux 2.6.24-tuxonice-r3 i686 X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.1 (2007 May 12, compiled Mar 8 2008 19:37:19) X-PGP-Key: http://wael.nasreddine.com/files/Wael_Nasreddine.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: apache 2.2.8 uid 80: exited on signal 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:58:15 -0000 --kswDJesP0akhmDn8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This One Time, at Band Camp, Wael Nasreddine said, On = Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 08:42:03PM +0100: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Kevin Downey said, On Fr= i, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:14:59AM -0700: > > I had a similar problem. I fixed it my commenting out one of the > > extensions listed in /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini > > I forgot which one. I currently have three of them commented out: > > #extension=3Dmcrypt.so > > #extension=3Dmbstring.so > > #extension=3Dmhash.so > I have commented the same modules that you have... I will try with it > this way and see if it happens again... > Thanks Ok that actually does work, I did more tests and the modules causing this are extension=3Dmbstring.so extension=3Dmcrypt.so both of them cause the Segfault(11) the nhash.so module is ok... Thanks > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Wael Nasreddine = wrote: > > > This One Time, at Band Camp, Mel said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:32:40PM +0100: > > > > On Friday 14 March 2008 16:32:30 Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > I have this problem with apache 2.2.8, and I don't know the reas= on yet. > > > > > FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 29 16:57:56 UTC 2008 > > > > > admin@BB.WeArab.Net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB > > > > > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz (2800.11-MHz K8-class CPU) > > > > > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf41 Stepping =3D 1 > > > > > Features=3D0xbfebfbff > > > >A,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > > > > Features2=3D0x641d > > > > > AMD Features=3D0x20100800 > > > > > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > > > > usable memory =3D 2139377664 (2040 MB) > > > > > avail memory =3D 2064826368 (1969 MB) > > > > > ACPI APIC Table: > > > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > > > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > > > > ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 4 > > > > > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > > > > > ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard > > > > > acpi0: on motherboard > > > > > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > > > > > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > > > > > acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed > > > > > acpi0: reservation of 100000, 7fde0000 (3) failed > > > > > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > > > > > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on a= cpi0 > > > > > cpu0: on acpi0 > > > > > p4tcc0: on cpu0 > > > > > cpu1: on acpi0 > > > > > p4tcc1: on cpu1 > > > > > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > > > > > pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 > > > > > pci0: on pcib0 > > > > > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > > > > > pci1: on pcib1 > > > > > pcib2: at device 3.0 on pci0 > > > > > pci2: on pcib2 > > > > > em0: port > > > > > 0x9000-0x901f mem 0xf9020000-0xf903ffff,0xf9000000-0xf901ffff ir= q 18 at > > > > > device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Ethernet address: 00:11:d8:ba:51:8d > > > > > em0: [FILTER] > > > > > pcib3: at device 28.0 on pci0 > > > > > pci3: on pcib3 > > > > > vgapci0: port 0xa000-0xa0ff mem > > > > > 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xfc000000-0xfc000fff irq 24 at device 2.0= on pci3 > > > > > pci0: at device 29.0 (no driver attached) > > > > > pci0: at device 29.1 (no driver attached) > > > > > pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) > > > > > pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) > > > > > pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 > > > > > pci4: on pcib4 > > > > > atapci0: port > > > > > 0xb000-0xb03f,0xb400-0xb40f,0xb800-0xb87f mem > > > > > 0xfd020000-0xfd020fff,0xfd000000-0xfd01ffff irq 23 at device 4.0= on pci4 > > > > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > > > > atapci0: [ITHREAD] > > > > > ata2: on atapci0 > > > > > ata2: [ITHREAD] > > > > > ata3: on atapci0 > > > > > ata3: [ITHREAD] > > > > > ata4: on atapci0 > > > > > ata4: [ITHREAD] > > > > > ata5: on atapci0 > > > > > ata5: [ITHREAD] > > > > > isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 > > > > > isa0: on isab0 > > > > > atapci1: port > > > > > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf000-0xf00f irq 18 at devi= ce 31.2 on > > > > > pci0 ata0: on atapci1 > > > > > ata0: [ITHREAD] > > > > > ata1: on atapci1 > > > > > ata1: [ITHREAD] > > > > > pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) > > > > > pci0: at device 31.5 (no driver attached) > > > > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > > > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > > > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags = 0x10 on > > > > > acpi0 sio0: type 16550A > > > > > sio0: [FILTER] > > > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > > > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > > > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acp= i0 > > > > > sio1: type 16550A > > > > > sio1: [FILTER] > > > > > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0 > > > > > atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > > > > > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > > > > > kbd0 at atkbd0 > > > > > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > > > > > atkbd0: [ITHREAD] > > > > > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > > > > > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=3D0x300> > > > > > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbfff= f on isa0 > > > > > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > > > > > ad0: 238475MB at ata0-master SATA= 150 > > > > > ad4: 238475MB at ata2-master SATA= 150 > > > > > ad6: 381554MB at ata3-master SATA= 150 > > > > > SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! > > > > > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > > > > > em0: link state changed to UP > > > > > pid 8458 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 82334 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 82374 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 82375 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 82423 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 82520 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 88487 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 98657 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 52780 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > > pid 58619 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 4 > > > > #define SIGILL 4 /* illegal instr. (not reset when = caught) */ > > > > If you're sure there are no CPU specific flags set during apache c= ompilation, > > > > you might want to get a core dump. Is apache the only program crea= ting > > > > SIGILL? > > > I'm having a similar issue, ny dmesg is filled with > > > -------- CUT > > > pid 63364 (httpd), uid 80: exited on signal 11 > > > -------- CUT > > > my /etc/make.conf: > > > -------- CUT > > > CFLAGS+=3D"-march=3Dpentium4" > > > WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes > > > WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes > > > # Use Perl with threads > > > WITH_THREADS=3Dyes > > > # added by use.perl 2008-03-13 22:04:11 > > > PERL_VER=3D5.8.8 > > > PERL_VERSION=3D5.8.8 > > > -------- CUT > > > what could be the problem... > > > -- > > > Wael Nasreddine > > > http://wael.nasreddine.com > > > PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18= A2 > > > .: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, > > > would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --=20 Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 =2E: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. --kswDJesP0akhmDn8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH2ubIVWU5RcjdGKIRAsq1AKDsg3W8bJH6kT5EHHr4hl0iS6f9jgCg2lkD 3ONA77f2m1Sizd6+KLiHFnA= =XMAK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kswDJesP0akhmDn8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 22:10:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463C1106566B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254468FC15 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:10:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-71-116-247-93.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.116.247.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m2EMAf72088823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: From: Doug Hardie To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:10:40 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/6234/Fri Mar 14 11:12:40 2008 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:10:43 -0000 I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: (gdb) 215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / toMONTHS; (gdb) 223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; (gdb) 224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; (gdb) p c.rmonths $1 = 0 (gdb) p c $2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 '\0', renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} (gdb) p c->rmonths $3 = 6 (gdb) p c.rmonths $4 = 6 Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a shared library though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 22:17:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165531065670 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C9E8FC17 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2EMGnls003704; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:16:50 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:16:39 -0500 To: Doug Hardie , freebsd-questions From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080314-0, 03/14/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:17:26 -0000 At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out >why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped >through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: > >(gdb) >215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / toMONTHS; >(gdb) >223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; >(gdb) >224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; >(gdb) p c.rmonths >$1 = 0 >(gdb) p c >$2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, > type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', > dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 '\0', > renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} >(gdb) p c->rmonths >$3 = 6 >(gdb) p c.rmonths >$4 = 6 > > >Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. >What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. >The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a shared >library though. It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some printf's in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to in actual running code. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 23:00:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAA41065675 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34A78FC1B for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csar@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 19816 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2008 23:11:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.75?) (200.13.161.233) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 2008 23:11:17 -0000 Message-ID: <47DB04E1.20904@123.com.sv> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:06:09 -0600 From: Cesar Amaya User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ewald Jenisch References: <20080314162921.GA3930@aurora.oekb.co.at> In-Reply-To: <20080314162921.GA3930@aurora.oekb.co.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 16GB AMD Opteron-machine - AMD64 or PAE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:00:54 -0000 Ewald Jenisch wrote: > Hi, > > For one of my machines (HP C-class Blade, 2 * AMD Opteron, 16GB RAM) > should I go for the i386 or the amd64 Version of FreeBSD 7.0? > > As far as I've seen kernel and system isn't a problem with the amd64 > version, but how about ports? > > To be specific here's what I'd like to install on this machine: > > o) mrtg > o) cacti > o) nfsen > o) named (caching DNS only) > o) ntpd > o) TSM-client (Client for IBM Backup-System running in Linux emulation mode) > > Does anybody have experience with any of these applications under the > amd64-Version of FreeBSD? Caveats any? > > Thanks in advance for any clue, > -ewald > Search for the subject "RAM not recognized". I have two 2 servers with Quad Core Intel-Xeon running FreeBSD-7.0-AMD64 and I had no problem at all. I installed several ports such as Samba, LDAP, Bind, Ntpd, Perl, Ruby, smbldap-tools. Regards!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 14 23:56:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D711065671 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD728FC1D for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-71-116-247-93.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.116.247.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m2ENuHFR093254 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:56:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: <511EC772-36FD-4799-B4A1-3AE690B6D048@lafn.org> From: Doug Hardie To: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:56:18 -0700 References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/6236/Fri Mar 14 15:39:27 2008 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:56:25 -0000 There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there waiting for me to enter a gdb command. On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote: > At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >> I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out >> why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped >> through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: >> >> (gdb) >> 215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / >> toMONTHS; >> (gdb) >> 223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; >> (gdb) >> 224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; >> (gdb) p c.rmonths >> $1 = 0 >> (gdb) p c >> $2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, >> type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', >> dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 '\0', >> renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} >> (gdb) p c->rmonths >> $3 = 6 >> (gdb) p c.rmonths >> $4 = 6 >> >> >> Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. >> What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. >> The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a shared >> library though. > > It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some > printf's in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to > in actual running code. > > -Derek > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 00:51:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C2C1065674 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:51:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.w.barnes@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7188FC17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jason.w.barnes@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so3610551fgg.35 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=M/NgicUml5IAApXxACyIfQamabkIAmdhMwT1hK+5GoM=; b=RWqQrfjB0PxICmSVqL1qiWPGR/N+qkJZxiJscq3ePf9a0if0Ni0yncfGW87b9mPgtxpO6zeSQY9m7OHImEyXGzMzacY/QFbKfPZqYlYdHFybzlX9/622+DVR40Wiu6S0kcFavJuwZ9SIj3Z4oB8ixuC1QThKVp39isFdOVqs36E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NQ5VcPLSUldAWtHdP+bTg3xZdYBqcXQh7kljA+vfLHOwjiHWuOhEOItECUPbdYnVL+GHoFNzdr4zOcku7T0QD4waRyTp0FtoaoR7PIu2N02Xn7ivlnJpXpZ5pEDAbq0yqJIKOZ7ZGEHuTBe3clMfIHnGMTyOyCkFUweVr9wS4rc= Received: by 10.82.148.7 with SMTP id v7mr28116811bud.37.1205542305093; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.181.13 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:51:45 -0700 From: "Jason Barnes" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B038755C3@etg2.etg.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B038755C3@etg2.etg.local> Cc: Subject: Re: interactive stop on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:51:47 -0000 These suggestions look really good -- thanks for your help everyone. I'll let you know how they work :) - Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 01:31:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D86E106566C for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:31:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C618FC20 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2F1VQCx053124; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:31:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314202817.025de470@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:31:16 -0500 To: Doug Hardie From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <511EC772-36FD-4799-B4A1-3AE690B6D048@lafn.org> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> <511EC772-36FD-4799-B4A1-3AE690B6D048@lafn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080314-0, 03/14/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:31:43 -0000 At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there >waiting for me to enter a gdb command. > > >On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote: > >>At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >>>I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out >>>why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped >>>through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: >>> >>>(gdb) >>>215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / >>>toMONTHS; >>>(gdb) >>>223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; >>>(gdb) >>>224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; >>>(gdb) p c.rmonths >>>$1 = 0 >>>(gdb) p c >>>$2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, >>> type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', >>> dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 '\0', >>> renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} >>>(gdb) p c->rmonths >>>$3 = 6 >>>(gdb) p c.rmonths >>>$4 = 6 >>> >>> >>>Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. >>>What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. >>>The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a shared >>>library though. >> >>It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some >>printf's in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to >>in actual running code. >> >> -Derek I understand it is waiting at a breakpoint in gdb. What I meant was put printf's in your code and run the program and look at the output. You can use fprintf's to stderr if your prefer and just look at the stderr output. It is hard to diagnose what could be a compiler error, or a coding error. Remember in C you can do many things you really shouldn't. It is also advisable to run lint over your source code too. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 01:36:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533EC106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from ti-edu.ch (posta.ti-edu.ch [195.176.176.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76A38FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Virus-Scanned: by cgpav Received: from [193.5.152.27] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) by ti-edu.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 24866138 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:36:11 +0100 Message-ID: <47DB19D8.2010001@supsi.ch> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:35:36 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:36:13 -0000 Hi all. This is driving me mad.. I hope a kind soul can help me out.. This is the relevant environment: # uname -rms FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p23 i386 # hostname jupiter.maindomain.com # cat /etc/mail/local-host-names maindomain.com mydomain1.com # cat /etc/mail/generics-domains mydomain1.com # cat /etc/mail/genericstable md101 john@mydomain1.com md102 jack@mydomain1.com # cat /etc/mail/virtusertable john@mydomain1.com md101 jack@mydomain1.com md102 entries in hostname.mc FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') MX hostnames are all A records. well, as long as the users receive/send emails from/to external domains everything works just fine, but when: john@mydomain1.com sends to jack@mydomain1.com or viceversa the message gets to the right user, but the from header is changed to john@maindomain.com, mailbox that doesn't exists! Any hints/suggestions? Please, help! Thank you. Robi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 01:52:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA971065672 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhomel.chinsio@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8858FC1E for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:52:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhomel.chinsio@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so4203841wfa.7 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=zNN0/V5SZrWkT2TB4sP+G8bAwQdvrtriQ1U9NMKyI50=; b=mOXWUbYQ+9Wr8iD1/xkLqVJZ6l893jm1RFTgUtdqqlJ7R0NY6/JaqjCm5LdNCvTM1j6tTXF8l9v9L4pEvFOqjriNWHIZxqraoNh3CHkn+kA6wVtkFDA23SfSegKcUVB+nUUTDbBm0D5sBOccjaJblKxufPdPLkn8NivuSK1jDGo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=bmFjTBIg3uxFN96tUBQzNTxCDhks4IVd1x6amM4/Ovmz9H2Tr4bFez4BI0/f107t3GTPtBORWfNO8FFWvRFjvoL2Focut056EHIKXoXS8n7yxw2kZCub0OvU2vs5u63G7OrG5otCVmx/v9tYivb0lo6k3v0JEobmEPDGfA0o3JY= Received: by 10.142.83.4 with SMTP id g4mr5442412wfb.103.1205544445643; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.126.19 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:25 -0700 From: "Rhomel Chinsio" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Samba listing same file twice and omitting others X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:52:40 -0000 Hi Everyone, I've got freebsd 7.0 RELEASE AMD64 running with samba and ZFS. Everything seems to work, except samba is incorrectly reporting a small chunk of files. For certain files, the file appears twice on a windows machine but reading from both files yields the same file. For other files, it does not report the file at all. But if you copy the same file again, it will ask you if you want to replace the existing file. Additionally if you go onto the freebsd box and do an ls on the files, they will appear correctly (missing ones show up and duplicates do not). I tried two different windows boxes (vista and windows xp sp2) and both behave the same way. All permissions are set to 777 on all files. Any idea if this is a samba bug? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 02:49:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87162106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1228FC13 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pool-71-116-247-93.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.116.247.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m2F2nT0X001168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:49:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Message-Id: From: Doug Hardie To: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314202817.025de470@mail.computinginnovations.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:49:29 -0700 References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> <511EC772-36FD-4799-B4A1-3AE690B6D048@lafn.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080314202817.025de470@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.7/6238/Fri Mar 14 19:28:24 2008 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:49:33 -0000 On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote: > At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >> There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there >> waiting for me to enter a gdb command. >> >> >> On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote: >> >>> At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >>>> I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure >>>> out >>>> why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped >>>> through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: >>>> >>>> (gdb) >>>> 215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / >>>> toMONTHS; >>>> (gdb) >>>> 223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; >>>> (gdb) >>>> 224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; >>>> (gdb) p c.rmonths >>>> $1 = 0 >>>> (gdb) p c >>>> $2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, >>>> type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', >>>> dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 >>>> '\0', >>>> renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} >>>> (gdb) p c->rmonths >>>> $3 = 6 >>>> (gdb) p c.rmonths >>>> $4 = 6 >>>> >>>> >>>> Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. >>>> What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. >>>> The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a >>>> shared >>>> library though. >>> >>> It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some >>> printf's in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to >>> in actual running code. >>> >>> -Derek > > I understand it is waiting at a breakpoint in gdb. What I meant was > put printf's in your code and run the program and look at the > output. You can use fprintf's to stderr if your prefer and just > look at the stderr output. > > It is hard to diagnose what could be a compiler error, or a coding > error. Remember in C you can do many things you really shouldn't. > It is also advisable to run lint over your source code too. All that lint shows is it doesn't like comments using // and lots of errors in /usr/include files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 04:30:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5DB106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from hpsmtp-eml15.kpnxchange.com (hpsmtp-eml15.kpnxchange.com [213.75.38.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E8F8FC12 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from cpsmtp-eml112.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.84.112]) by hpsmtp-eml15.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:18:47 +0100 Received: from ip51cc8423.speed.planet.nl ([81.204.132.35]) by cpsmtp-eml112.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:18:46 +0100 Received: from Alex1.kruijff.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ip51cc8423.speed.planet.nl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2F4IiXY004379; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:18:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Alex1.kruijff.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2F4IgYG004378; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:18:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) X-Authentication-Warning: Alex1.kruijff.org: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:18:41 +0100 From: Alex de Kruijff To: Alex de Kruijff Message-ID: <20080315041841.GA4314@Alex1.kruijff.org> References: <20080313220748.63be20bf.ghirai@ghirai.com> <18393.35674.442789.638417@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20080313223657.2be87400.ghirai@ghirai.com> <20080313211629.GB13059@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20080314170746.GA1076@Alex1.kruijff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080314170746.GA1076@Alex1.kruijff.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2008 04:18:47.0183 (UTC) FILETIME=[A9F459F0:01C88653] Cc: Jerry McAllister , Ghirai , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:30:52 -0000 On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:07:47PM +0100, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 05:16:29PM -0400, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:36:57PM +0200, Ghirai wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:15:22 -0400 > > > Robert Huff wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Ghirai writes: > > > > > > > > > Can't remember exactly since when, or how, but atm. i see this: > > > > > > > > > > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > > > /dev/ad6s3a 496M 454M 1.8M 100% / > > > > > > > > Start with /tmp. > > > > Also: > > > > > > > > du -x / | sort -nr | head -n 25 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the output (removed a couple other < 100KiB ): > > > > > > 986K /bin > > > 512B /dev > > > 366K /etc/rc.d > > > 270K /lib/geom > > > 250K /etc/mail > > > 170K /libexec > > > 138K /etc/ssh > > > 137M / > > > 121M /boot > > > 118K /etc/periodic > > > 116K /etc/defaults > > > 112M /boot/kernel > > > > > > /tmp is ~2MiB. > > > > try doing a df -k to see what file systems are really > > there and what they have in them. > > Then go in to root (/) and do ls -laF > > That may provide some clues. > > > > This seams to be be a partial account of /. > Try 'du -x / | grep \[\ 0-9\]*M' instead or 'du -shx /.[^.]* /*'. The first command should be: du -hx / | grep ^\[\ \.0-9\]\*M -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. Howtos based on my personal use, including information about setting up a firewall and creating traffic graphs with MRTG http://alex.kruijff.org/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 05:17:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F9A106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F238FC23 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:17:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDSK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m2F5HTgQ076130; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:17:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:18:28 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <200803101102.42533.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:17:30 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Peter Schuller Subject: RE: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:17:31 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Schuller [mailto:peter.schuller@infidyne.com] > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 2:02 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Chris; Adrian Chadd > Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 > > > > The people complaining about hardware compatibility need > > to pull their heads out. If they are buying brand new systems > > they are utter fools if they don't check out in advance > > what works and what doesen't. It's not like there's a > > shortage of experienced people on this list who could > > tell them what to buy. And if after the fact they find out > > their shiny new PC won't run FreeBSD - then they take it > > back to the retailer and exchange it for a different model. > > Why is this so difficult? > > The difficulty is not in checking out hardware before hand, the > problem is > FINDING hardware that satisfies your requirements. Just because I > know that > NIC so-and-so is recommended, it does not mean that I can find a complete > server that: > > * Is within the budget. > * Whose NIC is recommended for use in FreeBSD. > * Whose disk/raid controller is recommended for use in FreeBSD > - Including proper handling of write caching, cache flushing, etc > * Is being sold in a fashion that is acceptable with respect to hardware > support / replacement parts. > * Otherwise is known to work with well FreeBSD. > > If you are a large company buying 200 servers I'm sure it's not a > problem to > get sample servers to try things on, or go for more expensive > options just > because of perceived FreeBSD compatibility. > > If you're a poor sod trying to get *one* machine for personal or > small-company > use and you want something that works and is stable, especially > if you want > it rack mountable, it is NOT necessarily trivial. Part of it is > the problem > of finding a solution that meets the requirements, and parts of > it is about > figuring out whether a particular solution DOES meet the requirements. > > For example, once your cheaper Dell server has arrived and you > suddenly notice > that it's delivered without a BBU, and clearly has write caching > turned on > based on performance, try asking (remember, this is a lonely > customer with a > single service) Dell hardware support whether that particular > controller will > honor cache flush requests right down to the constituent > drives... I did, and > eventually got a response after 1-2 weeks. But the response was > such that I > could not feel confident that the question was accurately > forwarded to the > right individual. > That is exactly why computer consulting firms (like the one that partly owns the ISP I work for) exist. There's a list of them on the FreeBSD website that sell hardware. For the poor sod trying to get 1 machine, he has a choice: pay a trivial couple hundred bucks to a consulting firm that sells PCs to small businesses to supply the system he needs for his business do it himself and deal with all of the research beforehand, and all the post-support hassles with Dell or HP or whatever. You see, the problem is that the small business/home office types see these consumer-adverts in the backs of the newspaper for a $299.99 Dell, and they immediately assume a computer is a computer is a computer, and that they shouldn't have to pay a consultant more than $50 to provide everything with all the trimmings to them - because after all a consultant is going to do is just pick up the phone and place the order, eh? (frankly, the FBSD folk have it easy - this attitude is 10 times worse in the Mickeysoft consulting business) For the home user, his choice is either spending the $300 and crossing his fingers and hope the thing works at all, or actually approaching it from a professional point of view and doing what the businesses are supposed to be doing - that is, hiring a consultant that knows what they are doing, or spending the same amount of time and money that a knowledgeable consultant spent. You think I got my knowledge for free? I have a basement full of old computer hardware I bought over the years while I learned that says otherwise. Care for an $80 CGA card? Now do you see why consultants go crazy with that "your knowledge ain't worth anything" attitude? As long as the FreeBSD community cops the attitude that FBSD is only for do-it-yourselfers, it's going to be largely ignored by most of the business community. In any case, I can count the number of people who have posted "I'm planning on getting a system that is going to run FreeBSD what should I get" questions on the mailing list in the last year on the fingers of 1 hand, I think, so I really tend to discount this argument. I'll repeat, the vast majority of people complaining about hardware problems with FreeBSD are the folks who bought first, THEN when something didn't work, came running to the mailing list. And the vast majority of them claim they cannot take it back because it's past the UCC-mandated 30-day return timeperiod, so returning the stuff isn't an option. (of course, when you really get into the troubleshooting process with them you find the stuff was purchased a year ago with Windows on it, and FBSD was just an afterthought once they got tired of playing with the latest mess from Redmond.) Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 05:47:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3811F1065673 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:47:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B418FC26 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDSK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m2F5lbDc076454; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Jim Pazarena" , "FreeBSD Mailing List" Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:48:36 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <47DA9E07.1020606@ccstores.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Subject: RE: wget / wput X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:47:42 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jim Pazarena > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:47 AM > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: wget / wput > > > I began using wput recently. > > While wput completes a transfer, it always ends with a > > Segmentation fault: 11 > > if the wput is forced to fail (with an incorrect password for > instance) it issues > what appears to be a correct response: > "login-Sequence failed .." > "Transmission of 1 file failed." > > but if the transfer completes as expected, Seg fault every time! > > suggestions would be appreciated. This is on FreeBSD 7.0 i386, however > I noticed the same error on 6.2 (and quit using wput for THAT reason). > Now I *would* like to use it, but this is disconcerting. > File a send-pr, this is obviously a bug with the port and the port maintainer should correct it. seg-faults happen when the programmer makes a mistake in the code, the port manager should have caught this and either corrected the bug or pursued it with the developer of wput. If a porter can't get a program to build without segfaulting under FBSD and they cannot get help from the developer, they should abandon the port. In the meantime, try going to the site that the wput program is hosted at and downloading the source, then compile it according to the directions in the wput distribution, and see if it still segfaults. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 08:00:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26691065671 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1B18FC1A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2F7xqNo029008; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:59:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2F7x9ZB029005; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:59:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:59:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Roberto Nunnari In-Reply-To: <47DB19D8.2010001@supsi.ch> Message-ID: <20080315085852.B28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <47DB19D8.2010001@supsi.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:00:22 -0000 > > entries in hostname.mc > FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') > FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') > GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') > > MX hostnames are all A records. > > well, as long as the users receive/send emails from/to external domains > everything works just fine, but when: > > john@mydomain1.com sends to jack@mydomain1.com or viceversa > > the message gets to the right user, but the from header is > changed to john@maindomain.com, mailbox that doesn't exists! could you please show whole hostname.mc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 08:08:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E453106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68888FC18 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:07:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2F877n7029206; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:07:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2F86VdO029159; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:07:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:06:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: David Wassman In-Reply-To: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B038755E1@etg2.etg.local> Message-ID: <20080315090055.L28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B038755E1@etg2.etg.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync or Soft Updates or gjournal for fileserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:08:05 -0000 > > My question is with this setup (Have not assembled or installed yet), > for a fileserver running Samba to share in mixed environment, what would > be better, sync, soft updates or gjournal. From my understanding, sync first - for the same amount of money, use cheaper and larger SATA disks, no special controller and RAID1 (gmirror), not RAID5. while RAID1 "wastes" half space, with large IDE drives you still get more space, while SATA drives are slightly slower, you still get FASTER system on writes because RAID5 is bad for this, and on reads. gain on not using RAID5 will outperform slower drives. > is the most secure as far as data integrity but suffers from > performance. Soft Updates is a mix between the two but from reading soft updates isn't the mix of two - it's much better. you actually get sync integrity with almost async performance, but with larger CPU usage, which - with modern CPUs - is minimal anyway. just use them :) gjournal will actually slow things down, for avoiding fsck on boot. properly configured freebsd doesn't crash every day so spending an hour (at most) on fsck doesn't make a problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 08:09:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E23F106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004438FC2A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2F896Bs029257; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:09:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m2F882CH029210; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:09:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:08:02 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Tech Valley Internet - Tony Kivits In-Reply-To: <200803141807.m2EI7F75021840@mail.techvalley.ca> Message-ID: <20080315090734.H28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200803141807.m2EI7F75021840@mail.techvalley.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualized FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:09:29 -0000 > I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's but need > to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized. Given a choice, I > would rather use FreeBSD because of the ease of use of keeping the ports > current. > > I am just wondering if anyone has used the virtualized FreeBSD in a producton > environment and if so what are the pros and cons? what is "virtualized FreeBSD"? if you mean FreeBSD jails - yes it runs fine, i use them on 6.3p1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 09:04:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FFE106566C for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556E88FC1A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422471EE819 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:04:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.097 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.172, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGVennyjCsff for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:04:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021271EE85D for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:04:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DB9115.1020208@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:04:21 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080314) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803141039.03096.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DA48C1.5010306@eskk.nu> <200803141208.57610.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803141208.57610.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:04:29 -0000 > There's your problem. I don't see a libpthread or better on 7.x a libthr.so > linked in: > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x38b55000) > > is what it shows on my 7.x system. > > So the question is, why isn't qt built with thread support. I don't see how > that's possible with the current ports makefile. > Do you have a file /lib/libthr.so*? > Yes I do. bsdpc01# find /lib | grep "libthr.so" /lib/libthr.so.3 So what do you suggest I do now? /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 10:05:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060A21065671 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:05:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842978FC1D for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id m2F9ffOc001080 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:41:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:41:42 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080315104142.0000069b@westmark> In-Reply-To: <20080315090734.H28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200803141807.m2EI7F75021840@mail.techvalley.ca> <20080315090734.H28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-pc-solaris2.11) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: Virtualized FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:05:26 -0000 On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:08:02 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's > > but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized. > > Given a choice, I would rather use FreeBSD because of the ease of > > use of keeping the ports current. > > > > I am just wondering if anyone has used the virtualized FreeBSD in a > > producton environment and if so what are the pros and cons? > > what is "virtualized FreeBSD"? > > if you mean FreeBSD jails - yes it runs fine, i use them on 6.3p1 I think it's obvious he means running freebsd as a guest OS on some kind of VM (VMWare, VirtualBox) -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D ++ http://nagual.nl/ + SunOS sxde 01/08 ++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 10:26:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDC4106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: from web51107.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web51107.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4DCC8FC12 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dino_vliet@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 76695 invoked by uid 60001); 15 Mar 2008 10:26:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=YpSit2PDwa2+rN9ZgBegMYgdd4cF0vypq2jm/N9eaPWW8PudWFeTyUyGR26WXuw/+Jezskc8Kbfsg6/P+/oyMUCiMBpMCVNusBxm/nqDs8iebsC7qFH9DuukWXMAjx6y7Tb6M6AmFAGneh6cg/o8N+vHW7SeK2FUCaPItAif/0o=; X-YMail-OSG: mDeOKecVM1mC8ha6LU040oAGEZnfGYC4mj8U8VxqRIhfdq_zhnhqdPfal4r3BfSeKU97vJPK9rWwyV3EV8NxBsK.q0ZDOXMdMjgwTwC4mDcxWuRyk3zLQM3V9k9RVZfrM742FalRrd2ro9J12XDImaNy5g-- Received: from [78.27.38.46] by web51107.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:26:52 PDT Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 03:26:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Dino Vliet To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <91913.75750.qm@web51107.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Failed Upgrading 'gnucash-2.2.0' to 'gnucash-2.2.3_2' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:26:54 -0000 Hi folks, I'm updating my ports and ran across this error message when I update my freebsd 6.2 amd64 system. When upgrading gnucash I get the following error: mkdir .libs c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -o .libs/ofxconnect cmdline.o nodeparser.o ofxpartner.o ofxconnect.o -rpath=/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib ../lib/.libs/libofx.so /usr/local/lib/libosp.so /usr/local/lib/libintl.so -lpthread /usr/local/lib/libcurl.so -L/usr/lib /usr/local/lib/libssh2.so -lssl -lcrypto /usr/local/lib/libxml++-1.0.so /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so -lz /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -lm -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib creating ofxconnect gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/finance/libofx/work/libofx-0.9.0/ofxconnect' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/finance/libofx/work/libofx-0.9.0' ===> Installing for libofx-0.9.0 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if finance/libofx already installed ===> libofx-0.9.0 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of finance/libofx without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/finance/libofx. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/finance/gnucash. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/finance/gnucash. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.36334.1 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=gnucash-2.2.0 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.2.0 make WITH_FAM_SYSTEM=fam ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! finance/gnucash (gnucash-2.2.0) (unknown build error) I've tried make deinstalling libofx, reinstalling, etc etc, all with no success. What can I do to fix this? /usr/ports/UPDATING doesn't have an entry for gnucash nor libofx Thanks in advanced, Dino --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 11:26:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BF91065672 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D28A8FC17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so6342176pyb.10 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:26:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=7/R+3q8bX7NKA0SKXRpi5pjarFFw6jRUjqqIDO+QzHo=; b=vJjWxVmR0vObXOJ9IXce3FA929QL5nNzEvw8VNDxZP6V8C+XRRx+1Nr6sOAMWhfpQTOz71vhm9sZz2xqUbU9+3CXAsL3zV+LXh5elUKT8wXeoim4iasfARXlN8fbVc3WbiTj9reMXoMUF3x1YZpDFfqM3Z8HWSRT0Js66YWHqYs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=K5N0wke37PSZZOkxlJNhDFhUMkgrLaLQbzT00h9xA0tOV5HoS88EzH4jze36Uu3Ff5PItxiKG0pqPRf/2QxN5V/DUE6jlzQKcBQ8j1sdrhdmSAMT0ZEAaUWeRJpgBtmuRpZb2OlhZSo/C6VJQI8IVNCxnPs+5vQjGMO4z7m9lnc= Received: by 10.65.44.5 with SMTP id w5mr25960903qbj.21.1205580412579; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.209.5 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f916c90803150426u6b6ef158sdfbac90d7008c8dc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:26:52 +0000 From: "Kemian Dang" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: System can not boot, seems can not find right partition after add new label X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:26:54 -0000 Hi,there: A short story is: When I boot my laptop, the screen tells me "invalida partition" and then give me the prompt "default: 0:ad(0,a)/boot/kernel/kernel". My FreeBSD / partition is at /dev/ad4s3a, so I tried "4:ad(3,a)/boot/kernel/kernel", but without lucky. Could someone tell me how should I give it the command, thanks in advance. Long story: Because my partition is nearly full, last night I delete a windows ntfs partition and try to use it under FreeBSD 7.0 Release as /home, I used to put /usr and /home together. I can not remember whether I do something stupid, I just dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4s2 to write zero, then when I want to use bsdlabel to create new slice, but the new slice did not show up. So I tried sysinstall, still did not work. I thought it was because it used to be a ntfs partition, so I wanted to boot to windows and delete the partition. But it could not boot till now. There used to be a easyBCD soft to help me boot freebsd from the Windows Vista boot loader, but it did not appear, but a directly Invalid Partition.... Any suggestion appreciated. Best wishes, Kemian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 13:00:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBCA1065670 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9885D8FC22 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2FD08O8056809; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:00:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080315075146.02610a20@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:59:57 -0500 To: Doug Hardie From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> <511EC772-36FD-4799-B4A1-3AE690B6D048@lafn.org> <6.0.0.22.2.20080314202817.025de470@mail.computinginnovations.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080314-0, 03/14/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:00:32 -0000 At 09:49 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >On Mar 14, 2008, at 18:31, Derek Ragona wrote: > >>At 06:56 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >>>There is no code running at that point. Its just sitting there >>>waiting for me to enter a gdb command. >>> >>> >>>On Mar 14, 2008, at 15:16, Derek Ragona wrote: >>> >>>>At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >>>>>I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure >>>>>out >>>>>why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped >>>>>through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: >>>>> >>>>>(gdb) >>>>>215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / >>>>>toMONTHS; >>>>>(gdb) >>>>>223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; >>>>>(gdb) >>>>>224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; >>>>>(gdb) p c.rmonths >>>>>$1 = 0 >>>>>(gdb) p c >>>>>$2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, >>>>> type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', >>>>> dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 >>>>>'\0', >>>>> renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} >>>>>(gdb) p c->rmonths >>>>>$3 = 6 >>>>>(gdb) p c.rmonths >>>>>$4 = 6 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. >>>>>What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. >>>>>The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a >>>>>shared >>>>>library though. >>>> >>>>It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some >>>>printf's in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to >>>>in actual running code. >>>> >>>> -Derek >> >>I understand it is waiting at a breakpoint in gdb. What I meant was >>put printf's in your code and run the program and look at the >>output. You can use fprintf's to stderr if your prefer and just >>look at the stderr output. >> >>It is hard to diagnose what could be a compiler error, or a coding >>error. Remember in C you can do many things you really shouldn't. >>It is also advisable to run lint over your source code too. > >All that lint shows is it doesn't like comments using // and lots of >errors in /usr/include files. This sounds more like a c++ program. c++ does a lot of variable initiation in code you usually won't see. If this is a c++ program, put conditional printf's or cout's in to check the code at actual runtime rather than in the debugger. You may want to use asserts. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 13:08:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0636A106571D for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DWassman@etgroup.net) Received: from mail3.etgroup.net (mail3.etgroup.net [66.195.99.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83B88FC17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DWassman@etgroup.net) Received: from mail2.etgroup.net (66.195.99.231) by etg6.etg.local (66.195.99.250) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:08:27 -0500 Received: from mail.etgroup.net ([66.195.99.210]) by mail2.etgroup.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:08:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:09:28 -0500 Message-ID: <4EFE19E52F4F844D997F24D759C4A23B03875669@etg2.etg.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: Sync or Soft Updates or gjournal Thread-Index: AciGnczL68eCoaVdTCi2VrtbjHYKpQ== From: David Wassman To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2008 13:08:27.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[A842D9C0:01C8869D] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync or Soft Updates or gjournal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:08:28 -0000 Wojciech, =20 Thanks for the response. I like gmirror and actually use it for two production machines but in this case, I think I still prefer to use the hardware RAID5 (for online expansion and rebuilds) and I always prefer to use SAS/SCSI if given a choice. Anyways, the hardware is already purchased. =20 So gjournal will slow it down. It is hard to believe all the hype of journalled filesystems is all about not having to fsck on boot. (Yes I know it is fsck not fschk (other post). Been working with M$ too much). =20 Does anyone know why Michael Lucas would say "up to 80GB" for soft updates? I start FreeBSD with Absolute BSD and Scary Daemons and has always found his advice solid and reliable. I hate to go against it here and be wrong. Especially, when this is a large project with the fate of FreeBSD being used in the environment here at stake.=20 =20 =20 David Wassman, MCP Net+ IT Network Administrator Davis, Monk & Company (800) 344-5034 (352) 372-6300 (352) 375-1583 FAX The information contained in this electronic message is legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify Davis, Monk & Company (352) 372-6300 and delete this communication immediately without reading it, making any copies of it or distributing it. =20 >=20 > My question is with this setup (Have not assembled or installed yet), > for a fileserver running Samba to share in mixed environment, what would > be better, sync, soft updates or gjournal. From my understanding, sync =20 first - for the same amount of money, use cheaper and larger SATA disks, no special controller and RAID1 (gmirror), not RAID5. while RAID1 "wastes" half space, with large IDE drives you still get more=20 space, while SATA drives are slightly slower, you still get FASTER system=20 on writes because RAID5 is bad for this, and on reads. gain on not using RAID5 will outperform slower drives. =20 > is the most secure as far as data integrity but suffers from > performance. Soft Updates is a mix between the two but from reading =20 soft updates isn't the mix of two - it's much better. you actually get=20 sync integrity with almost async performance, but with larger CPU=20 usage, which - with modern CPUs - is minimal anyway. =20 just use them :) =20 gjournal will actually slow things down, for avoiding fsck on boot. =20 properly configured freebsd doesn't crash every day so spending an hour=20 (at most) on fsck doesn't make a problem. =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 14:06:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCEE1065673 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:06:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.a.chalmers@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FA68FC1A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:06:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robert.a.chalmers@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so1378601anc.13 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:05:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:reply-to:from:to:subject:date:organization:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:message-id; bh=8pIRHV8AGLBpzwDZASD1q4aRCuadV4uvBoBsAECWE4s=; b=T1CQzyKQzhY2wKuv6DJPcmxzAFiD9IWmMcr0ctVFh2bzZN+wUDf0PhB7aD2/lwHi4u5j+AYSAUohsosLyApTIAuoJUU002WCpWVi6SHzleLixUkPGEZogsz57yIivITXcAkfItOBLTKeWYQvdv1/8CHs3MtFAbeVY7RO6cF4NBI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=reply-to:from:to:subject:date:organization:mime-version:content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:message-id; b=r2x3hU5aKTemdE83jeXcCe0mNVtHu2dHUaAbtLwP+CCpDSVhtp7+aKiv3jh4EbnPvPyULgZIIbZmLEZhIkNyw6o57LCGIxW9bhM8bvII48ZsdBot0YGScNWsTYe9whtlMUn0A7SQv0M9iT3g+604f43zRdo9grnxdNlU74o/+pY= Received: by 10.100.41.16 with SMTP id o16mr26057945ano.73.1205588220320; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Avalon ( [119.77.64.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm24812680agb.12.2008.03.15.06.36.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:36:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Robert Chalmers" To: Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:36:36 +1000 Organization: China Lights MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AciGoZJOg+EmR759Qd6FRJFn1Dnmww== Content-Language: en-au Message-ID: <47dbd0f9.07025a0a.3ace.00b7@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: A couple of questions about 7.0-RELEASE and X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@chalmers.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:06:00 -0000 I have just installed the new 7.0-RELEASE shown on the www.freebsd.org home page ( still confused as to whether this is CURRENT or STABLE ) and trying to get X working. It doesn't appear to have xorgcfg in it anywhere? Has this handy program been abandoned? I'm running it on an old SAMTRON 5Ei monitor of unknown HorizontalSync and VerticalSync patterns, and the card type is reported as S3. There are a couple of ways to configure the xorg.conf file available - but none seem to be producing any useable results. The handbook is clear and concise - but none of it works. I did a clean install of 7.0 and put X on at the time. But even the manual talks about xorgcfg - but its no where to be found? Should it be there? Or has it been discontinued? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 14:22:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC131065675 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from thenetnow.com (thenetnow.com [69.90.69.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477D58FC24 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANT) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JaXH2-0001lC-8h for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:22:12 -0400 Message-ID: <000b01c886a7$f5fa2150$6501a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:22:11 -0400 Organization: The Net Now MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: Load Averages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:22:13 -0000 Hi all, I have a machine that has be up now for a little over two years: voyager ROOT /var/log > w 10:15AM up 741 days, 2:42, 1 user, load averages: 1.06, 1.02, 1.00 USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE WHAT **** p0 ************ 10:08AM - w and as you can see from the 'w' output above, the load average is running about 1.00 for all three timeframes. This machine is a nameserver only and has only a few processes running on it. I have tried shutting down all but the very necessary of processes and the 1-5-15 minute averages stay the same. This has only started over the past week. At the start of last week, my mrtg graphs showed it spiked at 1.00 for about an hour, then subsided. It did the same a few days later, and today, has been at 1.00 since about midnight. This machine is a Dell PE 500SC (Vintage about 2002), and is running FreeBSD 4.4. Questions: Is there another way (other than top or ps) that will show what is causing the spike? ps and top are showing nothing. Should I be worried? COuld this be an indication of a hardware problem? Here is the top output: last pid: 5181; load averages: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 up 741+02:47:14 10:19:56 23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping CPU states: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2% idle Mem: 34M Active, 102M Inact, 44M Wired, 9924K Cache, 35M Buf, 58M Free Swap: 516M Total, 1416K Used, 514M Free PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 5181 root 28 0 1888K 1004K RUN 0:00 1.35% 0.24% top 4988 root 2 0 12084K 11540K select 0:36 0.10% 0.10% named 182 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 6:05 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod 92063 root 10 0 968K 628K nanslp 4:12 0.00% 0.00% cron 172 root 2 0 940K 428K select 2:52 0.00% 0.00% syslogd 183 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 2:36 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod 184 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 1:57 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod 211 root 2 0 904K 352K select 1:49 0.00% 0.00% usbd 185 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 0:28 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod 38935 root 2 0 2100K 784K select 0:11 0.00% 0.00% sshd 5102 root 2 0 2144K 1332K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sshd 4984 root 2 0 6760K 6052K select 0:00 0.00% 0.00% perl 5107 root 18 0 1296K 816K pause 0:00 0.00% 0.00% csh 5103 gpeel 18 0 1292K 820K pause 0:00 0.00% 0.00% tcsh 291 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 292 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 295 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 293 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 315 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 290 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 294 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 289 root 3 0 944K 288K ttyin 0:00 0.00% 0.00% getty 28 root 18 0 208K 0K pause 0:00 0.00% 0.00% adjkerntz and here is ps: voyager ROOT /var/log > ps -ax PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND 0 ?? DLs 0:40.00 (swapper) 1 ?? ILs 0:00.85 /sbin/init -- 2 ?? DL 1:55.25 (pagedaemon) 3 ?? DL 0:00.00 (vmdaemon) 4 ?? DL 9:38.95 (bufdaemon) 5 ?? DL 1151:29.78 (syncer) 28 ?? Is 0:00.00 adjkerntz -i 172 ?? Ss 2:52.26 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s 182 ?? I 6:05.35 nfsiod -n 4 183 ?? I 2:35.51 nfsiod -n 4 184 ?? I 1:56.52 nfsiod -n 4 185 ?? I 0:27.87 nfsiod -n 4 211 ?? Is 1:49.09 /usr/sbin/usbd 4984 ?? Ss 0:00.09 /usr/bin/perl /usr/local/webmin-1.320/miniserv.pl /etc/webmin/miniserv.co 4988 ?? Ss 0:35.94 named 5102 ?? S 0:00.31 sshd: ******* (sshd) 38935 ?? Is 0:11.12 /usr/sbin/sshd 92063 ?? Is 4:11.62 cron 5103 p0 Is 0:00.02 -tcsh (tcsh) 5107 p0 S 0:00.05 _su (csh) 5195 p0 R+ 0:00.00 ps -ax 315 v0 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv0 289 v1 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv1 290 v2 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv2 291 v3 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv3 292 v4 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv4 293 v5 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv5 294 v6 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv6 295 v7 Is+ 0:00.00 /usr/libexec/getty Pc ttyv7 TIA, -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 14:23:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455AB106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091AD8FC1F for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([71.79.250.82]) by hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080315142309.WOGD6098.hrndva-omta01.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:23:09 +0000 Message-ID: <000f01c886a7$f86de070$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:22:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: freebsd 7.0 sshd authenticating against ldap core dumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:23:10 -0000 Hello, Is anyone using ldap authentication with 7.0? I've got a 7.0-release box that i'm trying to get ldap authentication working with. The 7.0 box is the client in this case. I'm encrypting connections with tls, which is working. On the box itself i can do an ldapsearch for a user and an id for a user plus ls -l information on users shows up correctly. I've added ldap to my /etc/nsswitch.conf file. So far nothing has blown up, i can still log in as normal. My issue comes when i add the line: auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so try_first_pass to /etc/pam.d/sshd and restart sshd. Now whenever i try to log in either as a local user, nonldap or as an ldap user sshd exits with a signal 11, this only occurs with that line in pam.d/sshd, remove it and restart and all is well. I've googled and seen others with this but with no solution. My logs show sshd exiting with the signal 11 then nothing. An ssh -v -v -v shows the connection is closed after the file ~/.ssh/identity is searched for. Any help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 14:29:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C800B1065672 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Received: from mail2.techvalley.ca (mail2.techvalley.ca [66.199.130.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA188FC1D for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.techvalley.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDA1440057; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:31:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at techvalley.ca Received: from mail2.techvalley.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.techvalley.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id l2FambyZeQsr; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.techvalley.ca (S0106000ea62b0175.vs.shawcable.net [24.85.105.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.techvalley.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75948440058; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monsoon2.techvalley.ca ([192.168.1.1]) by mail.techvalley.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2FEVsId042025; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:31:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Message-Id: <200803151431.m2FEVsId042025@mail.techvalley.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:31:06 -0700 To: Wojciech Puchar From: Tech Valley Internet - Tony Kivits In-Reply-To: <20080315090734.H28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200803141807.m2EI7F75021840@mail.techvalley.ca> <20080315090734.H28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualized FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:29:01 -0000 At 01:08 AM 3/15/2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's >>but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is >>virtualized. Given a choice, I would rather use FreeBSD because of >>the ease of use of keeping the ports current. >> >>I am just wondering if anyone has used the virtualized FreeBSD in a >>producton environment and if so what are the pros and cons? > >what is "virtualized FreeBSD"? > >if you mean FreeBSD jails - yes it runs fine, i use them on 6.3p1 Sorry, I meant virtualized as in a guest os under Xen. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 14:48:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BA2106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Received: from mail2.techvalley.ca (mail2.techvalley.ca [66.199.130.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3632A8FC1A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.techvalley.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9C440058 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:33:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at techvalley.ca Received: from mail2.techvalley.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.techvalley.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FX6NuVbgkoZ8 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.techvalley.ca (S0106000ea62b0175.vs.shawcable.net [24.85.105.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.techvalley.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E6C440057 for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:33:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from monsoon2.techvalley.ca ([192.168.1.1]) by mail.techvalley.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2FEYBr7042058 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:34:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tony@techvalley.ca) Message-Id: <200803151434.m2FEYBr7042058@mail.techvalley.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 07:33:22 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Tech Valley Internet - Tony Kivits In-Reply-To: <20080315104142.0000069b@westmark> References: <200803141807.m2EI7F75021840@mail.techvalley.ca> <20080315090734.H28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080315104142.0000069b@westmark> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: Virtualized FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:48:15 -0000 At 02:41 AM 3/15/2008, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: >On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:08:02 +0100 (CET) >Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I am currently running CentOS on a bunch of virtualized guest os's > > > but need to upgrade them. I see that FreeBSD 7.0 is virtualized. > > > Given a choice, I would rather use FreeBSD because of the ease of > > > use of keeping the ports current. > > > > > > I am just wondering if anyone has used the virtualized FreeBSD in a > > > producton environment and if so what are the pros and cons? > > > > what is "virtualized FreeBSD"? > > > > if you mean FreeBSD jails - yes it runs fine, i use them on 6.3p1 > >I think it's obvious he means running freebsd as a guest OS on some >kind of VM (VMWare, VirtualBox) Yes Xen specifically. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 14:56:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3599106567A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892B98FC24 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D521CD18; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 06:56:55 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:56:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803141208.57610.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DB9115.1020208@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <47DB9115.1020208@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803151556.53784.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:56:56 -0000 On Saturday 15 March 2008 10:04:21 Leslie Jensen wrote: > > There's your problem. I don't see a libpthread or better on 7.x a > > libthr.so linked in: > > > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x38b55000) > > > > is what it shows on my 7.x system. > > > > So the question is, why isn't qt built with thread support. I don't see > > how that's possible with the current ports makefile. > > Do you have a file /lib/libthr.so*? > > Yes I do. > > bsdpc01# find /lib | grep "libthr.so" > /lib/libthr.so.3 > > So what do you suggest I do now? > portupgrade -Rf x11-toolkits/qt33 If uic still does not show linked to libthr, I have no clue what causes that on your system. I'd inspect /etc/libmap.conf, /etc/make.conf, the config.log for qt33 and the final link command that produces the uic binary. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 16:09:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3855106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [200.46.204.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CA88FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.1 anthesphoria.net m2FG8sac021985 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anthesphoria.net; s=phero; t=1205597345; bh=f/l1UN+GXQGVG9aTVOdUuS8uyUqzwMROSBgtCpbiH G4=; l=1186; h=X-Bogosity:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:X-Face:X-Operating-System: X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint:X-OpenPGP-Preferred-Keyserver:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=PoA3rQyP0YrRPT6yH8iBPDVL Y7QbLhxmZNY8aOW2ZLkUyRQv5VuKAnt7h5cvYz5sA2TbuibGpp+EmizzNHZbjwVWI1/ ro6xxTDUdQ9pNhOphMikfWfjoPJI8PwSs+9dgSJRZvaL9eB/EDTyCGCE7lYdUHPBnB5 XZDHUwV2wJBos= Received: from anthesphoria.net (adsl-200-42.eunet.yu [213.198.200.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2FG8sac021985 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:08:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:08:53 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= To: "Kemian Dang" Message-ID: <20080315170853.5127383d@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <82f916c90803150426u6b6ef158sdfbac90d7008c8dc@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f916c90803150426u6b6ef158sdfbac90d7008c8dc@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p11 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B X-OpenPGP-Preferred-Keyserver: x-hkp://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: System can not boot, seems can not find right partition after add new label X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:09:07 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:26:52 +0000 "Kemian Dang" wrote: [...] =20 > I can not remember whether I do something stupid, I just dd > if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/dev/ad4s2 to write zero, then when I want to use > bsdlabel to create new slice, but the new slice did not show up. So I > tried sysinstall, still did not work. What exactly did not work? You should use sysinstall (you can use FreeBSD installation CD or liveCD), go to Configure -> Fdisk, then change slice ad4s2 type to 165 and write the changes. I should work. Best regards. - --=20 Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 =3D =D0=9D=D0=B8=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=B0 =D0=9B=D0= =B5=D1=87=D0=B8=D1=9B fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iJwEAQEDAAYFAkfb9KAACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZiZAgQAmEk5apDER6fA5RP2Ja3Ia73m yAQZeuaqgOaFekLnX5YbB47Hkn6EFzezIhGL22O5vsKTQjWrYpjeMZnvqfqCTloT eLf9T8jXH4qt9yO3FNsT9RKPJWxxuzexn2f6TI6lbjTlzCzD5e5R6k2LGg7+xwZO z8v7c9gauY7UkMsHj6Y=3D =3DcOlO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 16:52:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078E5106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:52:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrizach@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EB58FC1F for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrizach@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so6505642pyb.10 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:52:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=zxSptzPGBrmsbyqY0TzJ5KiqnIoyAlLgrjCS5y3c9uk=; b=UfdeImI/7Ynmeexyr/nAkZD1xotvvyTiQjNYEjDuZDNux5YBaPD5GTZ5UpxyLjQFEWbrFCxa3gAXDHjE4QJvpgjlgq1TQbNTYWPD/MqrvC1acF0k1dWDOKzWvojkLGiExWf+ZgGmfq4PDE91nIqhd+g4v6YTMGRXnk4fDY5RRFI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=s7unNeXKpXaoc7F20YOFLrMU7ogAs9rFMpARqcgTVJ5txr63tuVsMFr+zY7cp8vNFZcT6iSuyWP7bAlZ4JZvk9FdpYYhsjd/PJIKJy3hjZXTIP5sOu7hzdz3hKJEKdV5rMD9HGZToXTSRt+1k7SbuI4Ilikzq1aAASVugjCIm0w= Received: by 10.141.107.13 with SMTP id j13mr7029204rvm.276.1205598490601; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.142.18 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4a89d1190803150928yf9acf1bs2b1cae0ddc02a8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:28:10 +0100 From: "Christian Zachariasen" To: "FreeBSD Mailing Lists" In-Reply-To: <20080314172244.GE9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080314004328.GA28414@phoenix.nasreddine.info> <20080314181055.S24652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080314172244.GE9831@phoenix.nasreddine.info> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Headless Azureus with any X11 Dependencies ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:52:27 -0000 I can, from the bottom of my heart, recommend TorrentFlux ( http://www.torrentflux.com). I used it for over two years on my shared server and it worked great. The great thing is - it's in ports! (/net-p2p/torrentflux). On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Wael Nasreddine wrote: > This One Time, at Band Camp, Wojciech Puchar < > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> said, On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:11:28PM > +0100: > >> I have a server at home, I use it as a mail server, as well as P2P > >> instead of running P2P on my Laptop, I run it on the server and I just > >> use clients to control it... > > > > isn't azureus a torrent program. > > > Yes it is. > > > use rtorrent, it's text mode and is fast > > > rtorrent is a fast text mode, but It has no WEB controller and no > multiuser :S > > I require WEB Controler + Multiuser because my uncle uses my server to > download torrents as his ISP filter P2P packets... > > Thanks. > > -- > Wael Nasreddine > http://wael.nasreddine.com > PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 > > .: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, > would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:00:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD8E106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from ti-edu.ch (posta.ti-edu.ch [195.176.176.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC488FC1E for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Virus-Scanned: by cgpav Received: from [193.5.152.27] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) by ti-edu.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 24873405; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:00:17 +0100 Message-ID: <47DC005C.1050203@supsi.ch> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:59:08 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <47DB19D8.2010001@supsi.ch> <20080315085852.B28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080315085852.B28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090201080408090904050602" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:00:20 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090201080408090904050602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yes. here it is. Thank you. Robi. Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> >> entries in hostname.mc >> FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') >> FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') >> GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') >> >> MX hostnames are all A records. >> >> well, as long as the users receive/send emails from/to external domains >> everything works just fine, but when: >> >> john@mydomain1.com sends to jack@mydomain1.com or viceversa >> >> the message gets to the right user, but the from header is >> changed to john@maindomain.com, mailbox that doesn't exists! > > could you please show whole hostname.mc > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------090201080408090904050602 Content-Type: text/plain; name="jupiter.maindomain.com.mc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="jupiter.maindomain.com.mc" divert(-1) # # Copyright (c) 1983 Eric P. Allman # Copyright (c) 1988, 1993 # The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. # # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without # modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions # are met: # 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. # 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright # notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the # documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. # 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software # must display the following acknowledgement: # This product includes software developed by the University of # California, Berkeley and its contributors. # 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors # may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software # without specific prior written permission. # # THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND # ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE # IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE # ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE # FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL # DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS # OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) # HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT # LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY # OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF # SUCH DAMAGE. # # # This is a generic configuration file for FreeBSD 5.X and later systems. # If you want to customize it, copy it to a name appropriate for your # environment and do the modifications there. # # The best documentation for this .mc file is: # /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README or # /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/cf/README # divert(0) VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc,v 1.29 2003/12/24 21:15:09 gshapiro Exp $') OSTYPE(freebsd6) DOMAIN(generic) FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -T /etc/mail/access') FEATURE(blacklist_recipients) FEATURE(local_lmtp) FEATURE(mailertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/mailertable') FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') dnl FEATURE(`stikyhost') dnl FEATURE(always_add_domain) dnl FEATURE(`always_add_domain') dnl FEATURE(`generics_entire_domain') dnl FEATURE(`virtuser_entire_domain') FEATURE(`dnsbl', `relays.ordb.org', `"550 Email rejected due to sending server misconfiguration - see http://www.ordb.org/faq/\#why_rejected"')dnl FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl.spamhaus.org', `"550 Mail from " $`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/"') FEATURE(`dnsbl', `list.dsbl.org', `"550 Mail from " $`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://dsbl.org/"') FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `"450 Mail from " $`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml"') dnl FEATURE(`genericstable') GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter.sock, F=, T=C:15m;S:4m;R:4m;E:10m') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT',`b, j, _, {daemon_name}, {if_name}, {if_addr}')dnl define(`confCW_FILE', `-o /etc/mail/local-host-names') dnl Enable for both IPv4 and IPv6 (optional) DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv4, Family=inet') #DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Name=IPv6, Family=inet6, Modifiers=O') define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBrokenAAAA') define(`confNO_RCPT_ACTION', `add-to-undisclosed') define(`confPRIVACY_FLAGS', `authwarnings,noexpn,novrfy') dnl define(`confDOMAIN_NAME', `jupiter.nunnisoft.ch') dnl MASQUERADE_AS(`maindomain.com') dnl MASQUERADE_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/masquerade-domains') MAILER(local) MAILER(smtp) --------------090201080408090904050602-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:08:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B27E106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285AB8FC1A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 19079 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2008 17:08:27 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 15 Mar 2008 17:08:27 -0000 Message-ID: <47DC0136.5020707@chuckr.org> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:02:46 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Ragona References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:08:28 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derek Ragona wrote: > At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: >> I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out >> why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped >> through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: >> >> (gdb) >> 215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / toMONTHS; >> (gdb) >> 223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; >> (gdb) >> 224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; >> (gdb) p c.rmonths >> $1 = 0 >> (gdb) p c >> $2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, >> type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', >> dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 '\0', >> renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} >> (gdb) p c->rmonths >> $3 = 6 >> (gdb) p c.rmonths >> $4 = 6 >> >> >> Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. >> What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. >> The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a shared >> library though. > > It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some printf's > in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to in actual > running code. 2points: (1) yes, you are right, without the source code, any guesses are at the same level as black magic, useless (2) if the user is learning to use gdb, then it is really bad manners to suggest that printfs should be used. While I have made massive use of printfs before I got used to gdb, gdb is incredibly more powerful, can do any and all that any prints might accomplish, and anyone who is willing to learn to use that debugger should be encouraged, not given bad habits that really should be a fallback only to environments where gdb won't work. > > -Derek > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH3AE2z62J6PPcoOkRAsOeAJ9ZcF4K9Rtonrw5oQXVF3opoxvBjgCcDGJR szL8DpVrdPjMMpV4+I+bTg0= =RKOo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:10:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316941065703 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006C48FC15 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9441EE869 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:10:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.887 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.887 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.963, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, MISSING_HEADERS=1.581, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wDUoPWkJhNmD for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:10:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF381EE86B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:10:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DC02E8.8090005@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:10:00 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080314) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803141208.57610.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DB9115.1020208@eskk.nu> <200803151556.53784.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803151556.53784.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:10:10 -0000 >> > > portupgrade -Rf x11-toolkits/qt33 > If uic still does not show linked to libthr, I have no clue what causes that > on your system. I'd inspect /etc/libmap.conf, /etc/make.conf, the config.log > for qt33 and the final link command that produces the uic binary. > I just did bsdpc01# pkg_info | grep qt3 and found no qt33 installed! So I'll start with installing it :-) I'm not sure what to do with uic but maybe that'll clear when it's installed. If the kdebase port needs qt33 to build, shouldn't it be installed as a dependency? /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:35:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D718106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E398FC16 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DF51CD18; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 09:35:55 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:35:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803151556.53784.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DC02E8.8090005@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <47DC02E8.8090005@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803151835.52594.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Leslie Jensen Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:35:56 -0000 On Saturday 15 March 2008 18:10:00 Leslie Jensen wrote: > > portupgrade -Rf x11-toolkits/qt33 > > If uic still does not show linked to libthr, I have no clue what causes > > that on your system. I'd inspect /etc/libmap.conf, /etc/make.conf, the > > config.log for qt33 and the final link command that produces the uic > > binary. > > I just did > bsdpc01# pkg_info | grep qt3 > and found no qt33 installed! That could be, cause the port is called qt33 but the package once installed qt-3 or qt-copy-3 :P Better: pkg_info qt-* -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:39:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161AD106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:39:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BF28FC13 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:39:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B641EE878 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:39:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.887 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.887 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.963, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, MISSING_HEADERS=1.581, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hRTXO-rEXLO for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:39:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6209B1EE84C for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:39:23 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DC09CB.7090803@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:39:23 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080314) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803151556.53784.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DC02E8.8090005@eskk.nu> <200803151835.52594.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803151835.52594.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:39:32 -0000 > That could be, cause the port is called qt33 but the package once installed > qt-3 or qt-copy-3 :P > Better: pkg_info qt-* Yes I realised that after I wrote my mail. I'm in the progress of portupgrade -Rf x11-toolkits/qt33 I'll report back when it's done. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:47:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61504106567A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A878FC16 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2FHldco039055; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:47:40 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.5.0 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m2FHldco039055 Message-ID: <47DC0BB6.8000806@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:47:34 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080310) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roberto Nunnari References: <47DB19D8.2010001@supsi.ch> <20080315085852.B28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47DC005C.1050203@supsi.ch> In-Reply-To: <47DC005C.1050203@supsi.ch> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFE77AA2508D7B0214C69628D" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:47:40 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6250/Sat Mar 15 15:56:38 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:47:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFE77AA2508D7B0214C69628D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roberto Nunnari wrote: > yes. here it is. >=20 > Thank you. > Robi. >=20 >=20 > Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> >>> entries in hostname.mc >>> FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') >>> FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') >>> GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') >>> >>> MX hostnames are all A records. >>> >>> well, as long as the users receive/send emails from/to external domai= ns >>> everything works just fine, but when: >>> >>> john@mydomain1.com sends to jack@mydomain1.com or viceversa >>> >>> the message gets to the right user, but the from header is >>> changed to john@maindomain.com, mailbox that doesn't exists! >> >> could you please show whole hostname.mc I assume that you've commented out all of the MASQUERADE and GENERICS stu= ff as part of your attempt to debug the problem and that you ultimately inte= nd to enable those capabilities. Hmmm... not entirely certain, but I believe the part you are missing is: FEATURE(limited_masquerade)dnl This causes sendmail to only apply masquerading to the domains listed in class {M} -- ie. what is listed in /etc/mail/generics-domains. Without that sendmail will also masquerade for any host in class {w} which includ= es any contents of /etc/mail/local-host-names, all the interfaces of your server by IP and any names those interfaces resolve into as well. You can see what the resulting lists are on your system by running sendmail -bt and then typing $=3Dw or $=3DM at the prompt. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigFE77AA2508D7B0214C69628D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkfcC7sACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz7FwCeN5r9ocAeknOq7LADZLiZNp47 MacAn3GLvxWcLbRVBETEjT8QJTPSZLRK =Q5jl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFE77AA2508D7B0214C69628D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 18:02:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D8B106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net (eastrmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.240.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACBA8FC12 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080315180246.YXIQ15722.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:02:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.my.domain ([68.97.41.207]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1W2L1Z0044UAjD80000000; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:02:21 -0400 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2FI3iY7025487 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:03:44 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) Received: (from tkgeomap@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m2FI3h9g025486 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:03:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: tkgeomap set sender to user0@tkgeomap.org using -f Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:03:43 -0500 From: Gordon devel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080315180343.GA25380@localhost.ok.cox.net> References: <47dbd0f9.07025a0a.3ace.00b7@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47dbd0f9.07025a0a.3ace.00b7@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: A couple of questions about 7.0-RELEASE and X11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:02:45 -0000 The configure program is now /usr/local/bin/xorgconfig . You might also want to try 'X -configure' , which does some hardware probing and puts a best guess configure file in /root/xorg.conf.new . The X documentation can still be a bit sketchy. Above advice came from books. Cheers, Gordon On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:36:36PM +1000, Robert Chalmers wrote: > I have just installed the new 7.0-RELEASE shown on the www.freebsd.org home > page ( still confused as to whether this is CURRENT or STABLE ) and trying > to get X working. > > It doesn't appear to have xorgcfg in it anywhere? Has this handy program > been abandoned? > > I'm running it on an old SAMTRON 5Ei monitor of unknown HorizontalSync and > VerticalSync patterns, and the card type is reported as S3. > > There are a couple of ways to configure the xorg.conf file available - but > none seem to be producing any useable results. > > The handbook is clear and concise - but none of it works. > > > > I did a clean install of 7.0 and put X on at the time. But even the manual > talks about xorgcfg - but its no where to be found? Should it be there? Or > has it been discontinued? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 17:37:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9131A1065670 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kilmih@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp6.yandex.ru (smtp6.yandex.ru [213.180.200.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D336D8FC24 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:37:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kilmih@yandex.ru) Received: from 89.20.120.214.permonline.ru ([89.20.120.214]:37641 "EHLO kilmih" smtp-auth: "kilmih" TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S5473436AbYCOQ6X (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:58:23 +0300 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp6 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1205600303 X-MsgDayCount: 1 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at smtp6.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: kilmih Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:58:22 +0500 From: "Yandex.RU" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.60.07) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <365422097.20080315215822@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:10:18 +0000 Cc: Subject: Where is packages-6.2-release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Yandex.RU" List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:37:48 -0000 Hello! I have only ONE question. Where is packages-6.2-release? I have FreeBSD 6.2, and tuning it. Where I can download packages for my freebsd version? I wait for reply! defenderx, with love :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 18:52:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0B3106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:52:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from hawk.thalamus.net (hawk.thalamus.net [212.31.160.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7848FC1D for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C3A1EE87A; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:52:41 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thalamus.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.098 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=4.2 tests=[AWL=-1.171, HELO_LH_HOME=3.169, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] Received: from hawk.thalamus.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hawk.thalamus.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MpF3RNvcWa0; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:52:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from lesbsdpc.homenet.home (c-195-216-040-164.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.164]) by hawk.thalamus.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73D11EE84F; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:52:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47DC1AF1.1090101@eskk.nu> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:52:33 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080314) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <47D7E889.8070100@eskk.nu> <200803151556.53784.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <47DC02E8.8090005@eskk.nu> <200803151835.52594.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200803151835.52594.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compile error, kde related? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 18:52:42 -0000 Mel skrev: > On Saturday 15 March 2008 18:10:00 Leslie Jensen wrote: >>> portupgrade -Rf x11-toolkits/qt33 >>> If uic still does not show linked to libthr, I have no clue what causes >>> that on your system. I'd inspect /etc/libmap.conf, /etc/make.conf, the >>> config.log for qt33 and the final link command that produces the uic >>> binary. >> I just did >> bsdpc01# pkg_info | grep qt3 >> and found no qt33 installed! > > That could be, cause the port is called qt33 but the package once installed > qt-3 or qt-copy-3 :P > Better: pkg_info qt-* Now after portupgrade -Rf x11-toolkits/qt33 is seems as if I still have the problem. bsdpc01# ldd /usr/local/bin/uic /usr/local/bin/uic: libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x280d0000) libmng.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libmng.so.1 (0x287b2000) libjpeg.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.9 (0x28813000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x28832000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x28857000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x28869000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x28871000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x28879000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x28880000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x28889000) libXft.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXft.so.2 (0x2888c000) libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x2889e000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x2890c000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x28936000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x28944000) libSM.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x28a31000) libICE.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x28a39000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x28a50000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x28b45000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x28b5a000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x28b65000) libaudio.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libaudio.so.2 (0x28c61000) libXt.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x28c77000) liblcms.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/liblcms.so.1 (0x28cc7000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x28cf7000) libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x28cfc000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x28d1c000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x28d1f000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x28d24000) What do you suggest I do now? /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 19:26:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F24E106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10418FC17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so5062226wxd.7 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:26:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=g14DpU74eGP0/Kni6PC+j60ynl4Gbjk/nOiVn8CcO3E=; b=jfahpyF+aCIACBpDu+xjU2WdX9EMn603DJF/7lp5r0q5t0i6b2sYAj56u7Q/8N/mtV2Y33iOxAYKA+xaEKtTbQVgVxBrIW8n+PgHE7KOQ8iaMRLo5JUk26qjANdO+w14KQkhkh8OZvZNwzIn3pH+bKuQAWl/hU3Cs6wk+JRZ4PU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=AHmQxmZmlLaX/Z/WVzYBhl65RbJkx+Vwb9aF/1BKokJrSaugoC+ZqlpF9h3Jd1IXjXIKoN0wGERsiwDZA4gNU9qmZpK/RXyeW3ewmrwXx/asl7aRfyAEV1yIPJ9ZrplO4ItwcWr+RbtX9kbM8EMVPhszl0JQvQQgjKBJ4McNtbo= Received: by 10.70.32.2 with SMTP id f2mr14055728wxf.63.1205609201295; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hexidigital.org ( [24.229.62.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h39sm1641926wxd.6.2008.03.15.12.26.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gbarber by hexidigital.org with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Jac1c-000JG3-4R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:26:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:26:36 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080315192636.GB68652@orion.hexidigital.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <365422097.20080315215822@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <365422097.20080315215822@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: Where is packages-6.2-release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:26:43 -0000 Yandex.RU said: > > I have only ONE question. > Where is packages-6.2-release? I have FreeBSD 6.2, and tuning it. > Where I can download packages for my freebsd version? > That is two questions. packages-6.2-release is gone, because 6.2-RELEASE has passed its EOL. For 6.X packages, you have a choice of packages-6.3-release or packages-6-stable. -- Glen Barber http://www.dev-urandom.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 19:29:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8674F1065689 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailist@whoweb.com) Received: from whoweb.com (whoweb.com [66.180.172.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5578FC2F for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:28:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailist@whoweb.com) Received: from whoweb.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whoweb.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m2FJPKbX084852 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:25:20 -0500 (EST) Received: (from mailist@localhost) by whoweb.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id m2FJPKe2084851 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:25:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:25:20 -0500 (EST) From: Incoming Mail List Message-Id: <200803151925.m2FJPKe2084851@whoweb.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Where is packages-6.2-release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:29:20 -0000 >I have only ONE question. >Where is packages-6.2-release? I have FreeBSD 6.2, and tuning it. >Where I can download packages for my freebsd version? Thats a great question, and it appears that the 6.2-release packages repository has been removed. Looking in ftp.freebsd.org I see 5-stable, 6-stable, 6.3-release, 7-stable, 7.0-release, and 8-current. There is no 6.2-release directory so "pkg_add -r" returns an error for any package that you try to load. Very aggravating. Apparently the release team is only providing packages for the most recent streams. I'd like to know why that is, and also why they insist on listing "packages" under "ports". The documentation makes it very clear there is a difference between the two. Why anyone on the release team thinks it's intuitive to look for a ready-to-go "package" under a "ports" directory which has been defined by documentation as something that needs to be compiled, is a mystery to simpletons like myself. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 19:41:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F309106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from mail1.etv.net (mail1.etv.net [66.111.113.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB758FC24 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from efinley04.etv.net ([74.214.237.51] helo=science3.efinley.com) by mail1.etv.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Jaby5-000PfS-46; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:22:57 -0600 From: Elliot Finley To: "Rhomel Chinsio" Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:22:57 -0600 Organization: Emery Telcom Message-ID: <3f8ot3tt4j4vgs0ude779fsa0o9f33ql2q@4ax.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.1/32.1088 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba listing same file twice and omitting others X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: efinleywork@efinley.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:41:34 -0000 =46ound in FreeBSD-Current: >With prompting, I found a suitable pre-existing bug report. > >bugzilla.samba.org bug 4715 > >They added the option to set "directory name cache size =3D 0" on a per = share=20 >basis. This has fixed my problems. On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:25 -0700, you wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >I've got freebsd 7.0 RELEASE AMD64 running with samba and ZFS. = Everything >seems to work, except samba is incorrectly reporting a small chunk of = files. > > >For certain files, the file appears twice on a windows machine but = reading >from both files yields the same file. For other files, it does not = report >the file at all. But if you copy the same file again, it will ask you if= you >want to replace the existing file. Additionally if you go onto the = freebsd >box and do an ls on the files, they will appear correctly (missing ones = show >up and duplicates do not). > >I tried two different windows boxes (vista and windows xp sp2) and both >behave the same way. All permissions are set to 777 on all files. > >Any idea if this is a samba bug? >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 19:43:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BFB1065671 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306EC8FC23 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so5069112wxd.7 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:43:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=MMeQ2/zgR+xREhrRdWo6q+NFDAoRZ8Sh8VnwG7cRqyY=; b=AE81TY4Q9b2xXdh/HL0xOjkoYWeU2ik11k7zoGAizPqgw647OJqeJxEk+T2U2T7tS312GL+6Me064SaIOZ3DHTzyLsVrTIBPMVK6NaeGnn3YrOO/ufWml/3S8IbXPq1eGXEzjEHgp7Wj/XPO7sjS80T6YMlvS+DQJaUJlKTaQfY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=xofhcqiKUvq9DAY64CHlTQ9e1IHWF3ZPPXq8ervWBjQFtIkbpDqgABu4bvSWSeKjbm2Gbk0oXgpVvY0YHTuaF/PUd9zewXg89PiRnFGz+UaAEi0rVVeqvtdNOeEeOgAKWD8StdYS8QQoGTy5teWBvkA05aSO123nkeeBeOLpCgk= Received: by 10.70.32.10 with SMTP id f10mr14116866wxf.20.1205610226056; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hexidigital.org ( [24.229.62.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i36sm4120194wxd.20.2008.03.15.12.43.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 12:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gbarber by hexidigital.org with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JacI9-000JPl-E8 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:43:41 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:43:41 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080315194341.GA74551@orion.hexidigital.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <365422097.20080315215822@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <365422097.20080315215822@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Subject: Re: Where is packages-6.2-release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:43:47 -0000 I forgot to add -- you can change the default ftp server for pkg_add: setenv PACKAGESITE ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/{YOUR_ARCH}/{FREEBSD_VERSION}/Latest -- Glen Barber (570)328-0318 http://www.dev-urandom.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 20:38:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB82B106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from ti-edu.ch (posta.ti-edu.ch [195.176.176.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3376C8FC18 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Virus-Scanned: by cgpav Received: from [193.5.152.27] (HELO [127.0.0.1]) by ti-edu.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.12) with ESMTP id 24874868; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:38:03 +0100 Message-ID: <47DC3362.9050607@supsi.ch> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:36:50 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <47DB19D8.2010001@supsi.ch> <20080315085852.B28960@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47DC005C.1050203@supsi.ch> <47DC0BB6.8000806@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <47DC0BB6.8000806@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail: from virtual address changed to maindomain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 20:38:05 -0000 Hello Matthew. Thank you for your reply. please see my comments below. Matthew Seaman wrote: > Roberto Nunnari wrote: >> yes. here it is. >> >> Thank you. >> Robi. >> >> >> Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>> >>>> entries in hostname.mc >>>> FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') >>>> FEATURE(genericstable, `hash -o /etc/mail/genericstable') >>>> GENERICS_DOMAIN_FILE(`/etc/mail/generics-domains') >>>> >>>> MX hostnames are all A records. >>>> >>>> well, as long as the users receive/send emails from/to external domains >>>> everything works just fine, but when: >>>> >>>> john@mydomain1.com sends to jack@mydomain1.com or viceversa >>>> >>>> the message gets to the right user, but the from header is >>>> changed to john@maindomain.com, mailbox that doesn't exists! >>> >>> could you please show whole hostname.mc > > > I assume that you've commented out all of the MASQUERADE and GENERICS stuff > as part of your attempt to debug the problem and that you ultimately intend > to enable those capabilities. Not sure.. I had masquerading enabled long ago.. but then I took it out and it was working just fine, because the host is already in the right domain.. but now that I need to add virtualdomains I think I may need it.. right? > > Hmmm... not entirely certain, but I believe the part you are missing is: > > FEATURE(limited_masquerade)dnl Tried that, but doesn't help.. but.. one thing that looks odd to me is this: # sendmail -bt ADDRESS TEST MODE (ruleset 3 NOT automatically invoked) Enter
> /map generics a Map named "generics" not found > > /map virtuser a map_lookup: virtuser (a) no match (0) see? it says that it doesn't know about the generics map! Any more thoughts on this, please? Best regards. Robi > > This causes sendmail to only apply masquerading to the domains listed in > class {M} -- ie. what is listed in /etc/mail/generics-domains. Without > that sendmail will also masquerade for any host in class {w} which includes > any contents of /etc/mail/local-host-names, all the interfaces of your > server by IP and any names those interfaces resolve into as well. You > can see what the resulting lists are on your system by running > > sendmail -bt > > and then typing $=w or $=M at the prompt. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 21:00:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7AD1065670 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@jcornwall.me.uk) Received: from vps1.jcornwall.me.uk (vps1.jcornwall.me.uk [193.227.111.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734208FC17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jay@jcornwall.me.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (evilrealms.demon.co.uk [62.49.12.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vps1.jcornwall.me.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158645200EC for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:00:56 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47DC3908.2000604@jcornwall.me.uk> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:00:56 +0000 From: "Jay L. T. Cornwall" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080227) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IPFW / Dummynet problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:00:57 -0000 Hi, My FreeBSD machine is configured as a bridge between two networks: |-----| |-----| | LAN | ---> vr0 <--bridge0--> vr1 --> | WAN | |-----| |-----| The following firewall ruleset works fine: add 00600 allow all from any to any via vr0 keep-state add 00610 allow tcp from any to any 22 in via vr1 setup keep-state add 00611 allow tcp from any to any 23 in via vr1 setup keep-state add 00612 allow tcp from any to any 113 in via vr1 setup keep-state add 00613 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 11 add 00620 check-state add 00630 deny all from any to any via vr1 add 00640 allow all from 192.168.1.30 to any add 00641 allow all from any to 192.168.1.30 I then add the following dummynet rules before these. The LAN continues to work (queueing is only applied to the vr1 WAN interface), the WAN continues to work from the bridge machine itself (192.168.1.30) but outbound HTTP connections from any client on the LAN fail. pipe 1 config bw 2Mbit/s queue 1 pipe 2 config bw 256Kbit/s queue 1 queue 1 config weight 10 pipe 1 queue 20 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 2 config weight 10 pipe 2 queue 20 mask src-ip 0xffffffff queue 3 config weight 2 pipe 1 queue 100 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 4 config weight 2 pipe 2 queue 10 mask src-ip 0xffffffff queue 5 config weight 1 pipe 1 queue 100 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff queue 6 config weight 1 pipe 2 queue 10 mask src-ip 0xffffffff add 00500 queue 1 tcp from any to any in via vr1 tcpflags ack iplen 0-52 add 00501 queue 2 tcp from any to any out via vr1 tcpflags ack iplen 0-52 add 00510 queue 3 udp from any to any in via vr1 add 00511 queue 4 udp from any to any out via vr1 add 00512 queue 3 tcp from any to any 22 in via vr1 add 00513 queue 4 tcp from any to any 22 out via vr1 add 00514 queue 3 tcp from any to any 993 in via vr1 add 00515 queue 4 tcp from any to any 993 out via vr1 add 00520 queue 5 all from any to any in via vr1 add 00521 queue 6 all from any to any out via vr1 I don't understand how queueing rules could affect the passing of any packet, except in delay? They do seem to match the queueing rules, e.g. rules 00520 and 00521 accumulate packets as connection attempts are made. Outbound packets even seem to pass to the WAN, so I can only assume it is an inbound/stateful problem? 00100 52 4548 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00500 30 1420 queue 1 tcp from any to any in via vr1 tcpflags ack iplen 0-52 00501 9 390 queue 2 tcp from any to any out via vr1 tcpflags ack iplen 0-52 00510 2 152 queue 3 udp from any to any in via vr1 00511 7 528 queue 4 udp from any to any out via vr1 00512 0 0 queue 3 tcp from any to any dst-port 22 in via vr1 00513 0 0 queue 4 tcp from any to any dst-port 22 out via vr1 00514 0 0 queue 3 tcp from any to any dst-port 993 in via vr1 00515 18 1228 queue 4 tcp from any to any dst-port 993 out via vr1 00520 26 1988 queue 5 ip from any to any in via vr1 00521 17 964 queue 6 ip from any to any out via vr1 00600 163 10082 allow ip from any to any via vr0 keep-state 00610 0 0 allow tcp from any to any dst-port 22 in via vr1 setup keep-state 00611 0 0 allow tcp from any to any dst-port 23 in via vr1 setup keep-state 00612 0 0 allow tcp from any to any dst-port 113 in via vr1 setup keep-state 00613 0 0 allow icmp from any to any icmptypes 11 00620 0 0 check-state 00630 0 0 deny ip from any to any via vr1 00640 405 102681 allow ip from 192.168.1.30 to any 00641 647 48255 allow ip from any to 192.168.1.30 65535 18 3086 deny ip from any to any Thanks for any light you can shed on this. -- Jay L. T. Cornwall http://www.jcornwall.me.uk/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 21:16:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2399A1065670 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34DD8FC26 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2FLGSMt074593; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:16:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080315161039.0260cbe0@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:16:17 -0500 To: Chuck Robey From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: <47DC0136.5020707@chuckr.org> References: <6.0.0.22.2.20080314171533.023f7c88@mail.computinginnovations.com> <47DC0136.5020707@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080315-0, 03/15/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: C compiler issue perhaps? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:16:49 -0000 At 12:02 PM 3/15/2008, Chuck Robey wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Derek Ragona wrote: > > At 05:10 PM 3/14/2008, Doug Hardie wrote: > >> I have a program I was testing with gdb. I was trying to figure out > >> why c.rmonths was always zero when it should have been 6. Stepped > >> through using the gdb n command. Here is the output: > >> > >> (gdb) > >> 215 c.rmonths = (edate - tdate) / toMONTHS; > >> (gdb) > >> 223 c.dial_in = u.dial_in[0]; > >> (gdb) > >> 224 c.dsl = u.dsl[0]; > >> (gdb) p c.rmonths > >> $1 = 0 > >> (gdb) p c > >> $2 = {fa = 0, pwp = 0, disp_email = 0, imonths = 0, rmonths = 6, > >> type = 73 'I', cd = 0 '\0', dial_in = 82 'R', dsl = 0 '\0', > >> dsl_kit = 0 '\0', ip = 0 '\0', domain = 0 '\0', n_domain = 0 '\0', > >> renewal = 89 'Y', program = "I\000\000"} > >> (gdb) p c->rmonths > >> $3 = 6 > >> (gdb) p c.rmonths > >> $4 = 6 > >> > >> > >> Notice, the first time i print it its zero. The second time its 6. > >> What gives here? I have seen this before but couldn't pin it down. > >> The program is not compiled with any optimization. It is in a shared > >> library though. > > > > It is hard to tell without the code you used. I would put some printf's > > in the code and see what and when that variable gets set to in actual > > running code. > >2points: > >(1) yes, you are right, without the source code, any guesses are at the > same level as black magic, useless >(2) if the user is learning to use gdb, then it is really bad manners to > suggest that printfs should be used. While I have made massive use > of printfs before I got used to gdb, gdb is incredibly more powerful, > can do any and all that any prints might accomplish, and anyone who > is willing to learn to use that debugger should be encouraged, not > given bad habits that really should be a fallback only to environments > where gdb won't work. Chuck, On your point 2 let me say that there are simply times when a developer needs to check run-time code versus running the code in a debugger. Debuggers are a great tool, but they do cause some side-effects as was noted in the original post. If the debugger is not consistent in the variable values, it is of little use if those values are causing a problem. What I originally suggested was using conditionally compiled fprintf's to check those variable values running the program by itself instead of inside gdb. I know adding additional code, even just fprintf's, can change the way a program is compiled and optimized. But this at least gives another way to validate the variables. -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 21:32:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2437D1065671 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BC38FC1B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jadyz-0000Jm-KH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:01 +0000 Received: from 78-1-88-52.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.88.52]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:01 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 78-1-88-52.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:31:52 +0100 Lines: 54 Message-ID: References: <000b01c886a7$f5fa2150$6501a8c0@GRANT> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigC8BB03752D0DC15C582EBD8E" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-88-52.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) In-Reply-To: <000b01c886a7$f5fa2150$6501a8c0@GRANT> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Sender: news Subject: Re: Load Averages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:32:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigC8BB03752D0DC15C582EBD8E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Grant Peel wrote: > last pid: 5181; load averages: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00 up 741+02:47:14=20 > 10:19:56 > 23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping > CPU states: 0.4% user, 0.0% nice, 0.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 99.2= %=20 > idle > Mem: 34M Active, 102M Inact, 44M Wired, 9924K Cache, 35M Buf, 58M Free > Swap: 516M Total, 1416K Used, 514M Free >=20 > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND= > 5181 root 28 0 1888K 1004K RUN 0:00 1.35% 0.24% top > 4988 root 2 0 12084K 11540K select 0:36 0.10% 0.10% named > 182 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 6:05 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod > 92063 root 10 0 968K 628K nanslp 4:12 0.00% 0.00% cron > 172 root 2 0 940K 428K select 2:52 0.00% 0.00% syslogd= > 183 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 2:36 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod > 184 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 1:57 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod > 211 root 2 0 904K 352K select 1:49 0.00% 0.00% usbd > 185 root 10 0 208K 0K nfsidl 0:28 0.00% 0.00% nfsiod > 38935 root 2 0 2100K 784K select 0:11 0.00% 0.00% sshd It looks harmless - the system is mostly idle. Maybe it's an accounting b= ug. Does the "last pid" field increase? I don't know if 4.x has the "show=20 system threads mode" but you might want to try hitting "S" in top and=20 see if it shows kernel-mode processes. --------------enigC8BB03752D0DC15C582EBD8E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH3EBIldnAQVacBcgRAg2GAKD0/2Fxn7l5UYSRupBfKvvABukV0gCeNx95 zLULVg+SS0Rx+otbuqqzzto= =+Dla -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigC8BB03752D0DC15C582EBD8E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 21:35:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FFC106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@wastegate.net) Received: from QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7138FC13 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mav@wastegate.net) Received: from OMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.35]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1Yw61Z00D0lTkoCA502b00; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:18:03 +0000 Received: from wastegate.net ([71.236.100.193]) by OMTA04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 1ZKK1Z0014AMNSF8Q00000; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:19:21 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=WXVGh7kbMo4A:10 a=WljSuWKFdGWGXKeRoHQA:9 a=VyIKN3H6A2gN7IgfMm4A:7 a=r0ZEzb5yuxkoNrkCRXkg4jNKe6kA:4 a=b8hG5vVbyAkA:10 Received: from [192.168.166.53] (dhcp3.wg.local [192.168.166.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mav) by wastegate.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEACBB823 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:19:18 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47DC3D4D.8090808@wastegate.net> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:19:09 -0400 From: Doug Reynolds User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: CAM errors with 7.0-RELEASE and USB hard drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:35:23 -0000 Hello, I've just hooked up my Western Digital MyBook 750G external usb hard drive to my server in order to make some backups. The drive is formated UFS, and it seems to work well. However, when doing large file transfers (ie, using DUMP or gzip'ing files) I keep getting these errors every so often: Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 46 de 70 cf 0 0 80 0 Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:24,1 Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Reserved ASC/ASCQ pair Mar 10 20:08:34 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) Mar 10 20:09:49 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 46 e4 d1 6f 0 0 80 0 Mar 10 20:09:49 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error Mar 10 20:09:49 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition Mar 10 20:09:49 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:24,1 Mar 10 20:09:49 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Reserved ASC/ASCQ pair Mar 10 20:09:49 hive kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) Every thing *seems* to be working ok, but I really would like to know if my backups are actually worth while. I am running this on a P4-2.5ghz system with 1.5G of ram. I am using an add-in USB 2.0 card (the mb doesn't support 2.0). The main drive is a 120G WD. The onboard controller is also disabled in the BIOS. my dmesg and uname -a: FreeBSD hive.wg.local 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #7: Sun Mar 2 13:46:07 EST 2008 root@hive.wg.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HIVE i386 Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #7: Sun Mar 2 13:46:07 EST 2008 root@hive.wg.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HIVE Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.50GHz (2500.11-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebf9ff Features2=0x4400 real memory = 1610547200 (1535 MB) avail memory = 1568702464 (1496 MB) kbd1 at kbdmux0 acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: on hostb0 agp0: aperture size is 256M pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 vgapci0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff,0xd9000000-0xd907ffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci1 xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd000-0xd03f irq 12 at device 9.0 on pci0 miibus0: on xl0 nsphy0: PHY 24 on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:60:08:bd:eb:bd xl0: [ITHREAD] xl1: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xd400-0xd43f irq 10 at device 10.0 on pci0 miibus1: on xl1 nsphy1: PHY 24 on miibus1 nsphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl1: Ethernet address: 00:60:08:bd:eb:7e xl1: [ITHREAD] ohci0: mem 0xdb000000-0xdb000fff irq 5 at device 11.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ohci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: OHCI version 1.0 usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xdb001000-0xdb001fff irq 11 at device 11.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] ohci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: OHCI version 1.0 usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xdb002000-0xdb0020ff irq 12 at device 11.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 5 ports with 5 removable, self powered umass0: on uhub2 isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xd800-0xd80f at device 17.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] acpi_tz0: on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcbfff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2500106444 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert enabled, rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, logging disabled ad0: 114473MB at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO4 ast0: TAPE at ata1-slave PIO4 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 715404MB (1465149168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 91201C) Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 21:39:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B23C1065674 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from mail46.e.nsc.no (mail46.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EE18FC17 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from toreld@netscape.net) Received: from [62.16.172.239] (062016172239.customer.alfanett.no [62.16.172.239]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail46.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m2FLd6h2014824 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:39:07 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <47DC41EB.8070009@netscape.net> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:38:51 +0100 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080229) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200803151925.m2FJPKe2084851@whoweb.com> In-Reply-To: <200803151925.m2FJPKe2084851@whoweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Where is packages-6.2-release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:39:10 -0000 Incoming Mail List wrote: >> I have only ONE question. >> Where is packages-6.2-release? I have FreeBSD 6.2, and tuning it. >> Where I can download packages for my freebsd version? > > Thats a great question, and it appears that the 6.2-release packages > repository has been removed. Looking in ftp.freebsd.org I see 5-stable, > 6-stable, 6.3-release, 7-stable, 7.0-release, and 8-current. There is > no 6.2-release directory so "pkg_add -r" returns an error for any package > that you try to load. Very aggravating. Aggravating indeed. The real question here is why the OP does not upgrade to 6.3-RELEASE. I don't see a problem with not providing disk space for such a specific set of packages, and especially when a number of them can be found on the ISOs for the release in question. -- Tore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 21:51:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB30106566C for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhomel.chinsio@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B488FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhomel.chinsio@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so4523153wfa.7 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=RJ2rH4wd29bGZlw7tmT+qmwY2pR6b4EtZD74q0nb6Ys=; b=pC0bCUW7w9ao7DmLCjt66Ze/lPbZyy3CVHBWN77eu1eLxTDu718myvNBfjy6PzpMnVHenqnzUEnLWTm6btOg0Wab3oiDzIqU2c5Bjx3iBtTsfSVkJ5qBprAjaSnbu78n9b/HEpL1JmHvHvlFVAdjeFesGW37t/sUs67MPhtZwAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=edkMu7JNutkuAIg03glmEXKFFRGrvmaysOqNzAvxzuI8ouX0GaGrKYPT3KBmVNinvg4Bd5cfrMccZ3fRiU/yRy8R0AYpvCz0BknQvu9a5zahT2+XcY4mjuxTCn7ExcV5MES5ozmcJKwvQmFwT2CavuV9w2IxIcXLHzv7d1f9Pgg= Received: by 10.142.49.4 with SMTP id w4mr5530406wfw.220.1205617893277; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.126.19 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:51:33 -0700 From: "Rhomel Chinsio" To: efinleywork@efinley.com In-Reply-To: <3f8ot3tt4j4vgs0ude779fsa0o9f33ql2q@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3f8ot3tt4j4vgs0ude779fsa0o9f33ql2q@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba listing same file twice and omitting others X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 21:51:34 -0000 I added directory name cache size = 0 to smb.conf under [global] and the problem is gone. Thanks for the reference. I'll have to watch this bug report. On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Elliot Finley wrote: > Found in FreeBSD-Current: > > >With prompting, I found a suitable pre-existing bug report. > > > >bugzilla.samba.org bug 4715 > > > >They added the option to set "directory name cache size = 0" on a per > share > >basis. This has fixed my problems. > > > On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:27:25 -0700, you wrote: > > >Hi Everyone, > > > >I've got freebsd 7.0 RELEASE AMD64 running with samba and ZFS. Everything > >seems to work, except samba is incorrectly reporting a small chunk of > files. > > > > > >For certain files, the file appears twice on a windows machine but > reading > >from both files yields the same file. For other files, it does not report > >the file at all. But if you copy the same file again, it will ask you if > you > >want to replace the existing file. Additionally if you go onto the > freebsd > >box and do an ls on the files, they will appear correctly (missing ones > show > >up and duplicates do not). > > > >I tried two different windows boxes (vista and windows xp sp2) and both > >behave the same way. All permissions are set to 777 on all files. > > > >Any idea if this is a samba bug? > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 22:11:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62130106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:11:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F708FC1D for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:11:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so6688569pyb.10 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:11:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=pgmtjDxINSM3UQ/cVROAgg7F2GlHSoQYdZlMxJtwLBg=; b=uJr3d6vbaPYtuArsgJ/JDtjfw5SIXP005JNRipxf/j2lkCEkkRnJaDTpGDO8EyB6cq0VdqYdDXfR8IJHlREMc/U1iMKGzHiXvNpT8Peopfi4xxJlpkLCCrOWQOgKXjQ4gqd+QcZQTwqY0KZpktKKMLcA2UhY4lPjKNiKOc5y6q4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=UzgGsjx3qfhd+a09C2/86AmvHQzbMr2dmAZK/cgPeuyPaV0HqBLc52lhIqoZ8CQ2aKBHJGjrZpngtDbPXpqT/XNgh2zdbuRWZtMGWdfgZHR4FAX3epafMJRoRwZyTm8qQY5b70kwTdZzxfMjSE0OKUAfumVZjzQPSXS/IxnWctc= Received: by 10.64.249.20 with SMTP id w20mr27233359qbh.24.1205619066830; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.70.2 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660803151511r6ae6d229v484769cfe38043bc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:11:06 -0600 From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Can one list permission bits numerically... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:11:09 -0000 Perhaps I missed it somewhere in the man page, but is there a way to list files with their permission bits displayed as numeric (octal, as in chmod(1)), instead of symbolic? Something like: ls -lF -imaginaryFlag 0755 4 Modulok Modulok 512 Dec 17 18:39 dir1/ 0644 1 Modulok Modulok 101786 Feb 23 05:53 file1 0644 1 Modulok Modulok 140097 Feb 13 23:38 file2 ... Thanks. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 22:17:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B161065673 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:17:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460948FC26 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dangkm@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so6691138pyb.10 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:16:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zpiMmq4v04z4l4nP3GmGd+z2mDQW0FtRKXbKgw47Orc=; b=NqMkTcsVfyj1qgL5ol3WJbUTJZ/K2qewpcAw1fpZKtNKitxVlGYGTb8UhabFkcyPOStd7ieQQQa4WU3H9/GS0h2zkMlEQVSjVGd3ZZoRCDxs9QO//0n39RGOU1DLk78wmFWSmyJmHe5P0hy3jOxH9dK3Ti/qVSRamEYhJGonxiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=wG8gQ6Ol0A0JwrO2YzgjMJBaKpxvgTCfzDeBO5KGM38/HG8BmlsjpRMkFjsS6RuCpvlENSVWavUSs087HddxbzXWVYh9wryrYA0a/KgpiBSKwRtjCckBguUnSemzidRjDrLb0Ji1AV3uQhYWBcDabgqh0sWw3AUB+1m+pSLcwHU= Received: by 10.65.180.9 with SMTP id h9mr27583560qbp.31.1205619418609; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.209.5 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82f916c90803151516g26cef076p44c2148577fad9bc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:16:58 +0000 From: "Kemian Dang" To: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nikola_Le=E8i=E6?=" In-Reply-To: <20080315170853.5127383d@anthesphoria.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <82f916c90803150426u6b6ef158sdfbac90d7008c8dc@mail.gmail.com> <20080315170853.5127383d@anthesphoria.net> Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System can not boot, seems can not find right partition after add new label X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:17:00 -0000 VGhhbmtzIGZvciByZXBvbnNlLAoKUHJvYmxlbSBpcyB0aGUgYm9vdCBwYXJ0aXRpb24gY2FuIG5v dCBiZSBmb3VuZC4KSSBidXJuZWQgYSBpbnN0YWxsIGNkbSB1c2luZyBpdCBJIGZpbmQgSSBoYXZl IHNldCBhZDRzMiB0byBiZQpib290YWJsZSwgc28gSSBjaGFuZ2VkIGl0IGJhY2suCkJ1dCB0aGlz IHRpbWUsIHRoZSBzeXN0ZW0gc2FpZCBJIGhhdmUgbWlzc2luZyBzb21ldGhpbmcgb24gYm9vdC4u LgoKSSBkbyBub3Qgd2FudCB0byB3YXN0ZSB0b28gbXVjaCB0aW1lIG9uIGl0LCBhcyBJIGNhbiBo YXZlIHRoZSBiYWNrIHVwCmRhdGEsIFNvIEkgcmUgaW5zdGFsbCB1c2luZyB0aGUgbmV3IGJ1cm5l ZCBDRC4uLgoKQmVzdCB3aGllcywKS2VtaWFuCgpPbiAxNS8wMy8yMDA4LCBOaWtvbGEgTGXEjWnE hyA8bmlrb2xhLmxlY2ljQGFudGhlc3Bob3JpYS5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlOgo+IC0tLS0tQkVHSU4gUEdQ IFNJR05FRCBNRVNTQUdFLS0tLS0KPiAgSGFzaDogUklQRU1EMTYwCj4KPiAgT24gU2F0LCAxNSBN YXIgMjAwOCAxMToyNjo1MiArMDAwMAo+ICAiS2VtaWFuIERhbmciIDxkYW5na21AZ21haWwuY29t PiB3cm90ZToKPgo+ICAgWy4uLl0KPgo+Cj4gID4gSSBjYW4gbm90IHJlbWVtYmVyIHdoZXRoZXIg SSBkbyBzb21ldGhpbmcgc3R1cGlkLCBJIGp1c3QgZGQKPiAgPiBpZj0vZGV2L3plcm8gb2Y9L2Rl di9hZDRzMiB0byB3cml0ZSB6ZXJvLCB0aGVuIHdoZW4gSSB3YW50IHRvIHVzZQo+ICA+IGJzZGxh YmVsIHRvIGNyZWF0ZSBuZXcgc2xpY2UsIGJ1dCB0aGUgbmV3IHNsaWNlIGRpZCBub3Qgc2hvdyB1 cC4gU28gSQo+ICA+IHRyaWVkIHN5c2luc3RhbGwsIHN0aWxsIGRpZCBub3Qgd29yay4KPgo+Cj4g V2hhdCBleGFjdGx5IGRpZCBub3Qgd29yaz8gWW91IHNob3VsZCB1c2Ugc3lzaW5zdGFsbCAoeW91 IGNhbiB1c2UKPiAgRnJlZUJTRCBpbnN0YWxsYXRpb24gQ0Qgb3IgbGl2ZUNEKSwgZ28gdG8gQ29u ZmlndXJlIC0+IEZkaXNrLCB0aGVuCj4gIGNoYW5nZSBzbGljZSBhZDRzMiB0eXBlIHRvIDE2NSBh bmQgd3JpdGUgdGhlIGNoYW5nZXMuIEkgc2hvdWxkIHdvcmsuCj4KPiAgQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLgo+ ICAtIC0tCj4gIE5pa29sYSBMZcSNacSHID0g0J3QuNC60L7Qu9CwINCb0LXRh9C40ZsKPiAgZmlu Z2VycHJpbnQgOiBGRUYzIDY2QUYgQzkwRSBFREMzIEQ4NzggIDdDREMgOTU2RCBGNEFCIEEzNzcg MUM5Qgo+ICB+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+ fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+fn5+Cj4gIC0tLS0tQkVHSU4gUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tCj4gIFZlcnNp b246IEdudVBHIHYyLjAuOCAoRnJlZUJTRCkKPgo+ICBpSndFQVFFREFBWUZBa2ZiOUtBQUNna1Ev TU0vMHJZSW9aaVpBZ1FBbUVrNWFwREVSNmZBNVJQMkphM0lhNzNtCj4gIHlBUVpldWFxZ09hRmVr TG5YNVliQjQ3SGtuNkVGemV6SWhHTDIyTzV2c0tUUWpXcllwamVNWm52cWZxQ1Rsb1QKPiAgZUxm OVQ4alhINHF0OXlPM0ZOc1Q5UktQSld4eHV6ZXhuMmY2VEk2bGJqVGx6Q3pENWU1UjZrMkxHZzcr eHdaTwo+ICB6OHY3YzlnYXVZN1VrTXNIajZZPQo+ICA9Y09sTwo+ICAtLS0tLUVORCBQR1AgU0lH TkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KPgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 22:24:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB80106566C for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648018FC12 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:24:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from modulok@gmail.com) Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id m63so3911849hsc.11 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:24:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=JaqBNxzSzpmsVBW0KVBIxBRl9oZ6tZLDNmOWyU/dod0=; b=YVG074SQJYVINqcBAAdDdOzy7vzD+1Hgmm8vcusGGK5L1AV9zHktB1uXIqppHzGg653KlSgFck/rjGjKQl4tI8uN0OE6kV102I2XH+GnR7HUo0ZpqWO2hJZbX//NnHVaqRgvlyzuONZ8ozlUk6KkKGAeyOpD7dfvIFWBncb76BI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r1OUmEGqD+uKLVYaE8U5VKy+6OVFfw5pXocGo1bmHDSjn5maEqReohrHF/UsTYzSsQU6fWGbRpz9cwq+VNv8PdxdcZQsBi1nzC4ekjrGsUC7Jb0cm5KfoFrEQi90x08dBXGutFMO4NJ0dsriwp7V6XylLyB1JXcsWyWKNdXSWJc= Received: by 10.65.15.19 with SMTP id s19mr27659378qbi.79.1205619854022; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.70.2 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <64c038660803151524x784331a0m589335709fd56e03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:24:13 -0600 From: Modulok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200803141812.17959.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <64c038660803131829q36310d80k3d8a041569e61ff7@mail.gmail.com> <20080314152553.GD19851@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <47DA9E42.4070702@dial.pipex.com> <200803141812.17959.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Subject: Re: /usr/local/www a tradition? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:24:15 -0000 > like system update? > keep it clean keep it simple > what will happen if you will decide to update system/software and > everything will be in random places not where is should be? I'm not too concerned with that. Automatic system updates are the key to temporal instability, arguably at the cost of security, but that's another story best saved for later... > I dislike the notion of putting project-specific data under /usr/local. > Config files and the like are easy to control, but large trees should be > able to live wherever I want them to live. I concur. I thought it would be easiest to keep all non-system data in one place (/home), but thought I'd best get the general consensus first. You have all been quite helpful. Thank you much. -Modulok- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 22:38:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ABE106566B for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [200.46.204.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF258FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.1 anthesphoria.net m2FMc6v9042044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anthesphoria.net; s=phero; t=1205620701; bh=bUynUqJ0o2Ex/QvHBZkmLaT89g6bZ2EsXWnZ2hLiu cE=; l=1087; h=X-Bogosity:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:X-Face:X-Operating-System: X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint:X-OpenPGP-Preferred-Keyserver:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=t1IyQ5uYuZSoPAAEaJU2pnDY H55snweuQFg06GJRgb990RnUBnln1ShTjAGvpZdhVQn7IbcZF+XtdoWfUH2mnzduAHK fLj4RFZ0RmrK72N/xHcCWGhcm1aaJJHqP6AVpCH0q/AXAaH0PRajAwzPvSRE9pFSt+Z EaqYtboyvlkZ4= Received: from anthesphoria.net (adsl-200-42.eunet.yu [213.198.200.42]) (authenticated bits=0) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2FMc6v9042044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:38:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:38:07 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= To: "Kemian Dang" Message-ID: <20080315233807.4909b4b3@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <82f916c90803151516g26cef076p44c2148577fad9bc@mail.gmail.com> References: <82f916c90803150426u6b6ef158sdfbac90d7008c8dc@mail.gmail.com> <20080315170853.5127383d@anthesphoria.net> <82f916c90803151516g26cef076p44c2148577fad9bc@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.8; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p11 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B X-OpenPGP-Preferred-Keyserver: x-hkp://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: System can not boot, seems can not find right partition after add new label X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:38:22 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:16:58 +0000 "Kemian Dang" wrote: =20 > Problem is the boot partition can not be found. > I burned a install cdm using it I find I have set ad4s2 to be > bootable, so I changed it back. > But this time, the system said I have missing something on boot... If you now see ad4s2a but cannot boot, you most probably need=20 'bsdlabel -B /dev/ad4a2' to install the proper bootstrap code there (see bsdlabel manpage). - --=20 Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 =3D =D0=9D=D0=B8=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=B0 =D0=9B=D0= =B5=D1=87=D0=B8=D1=9B fingerprint : FEF3 66AF C90E EDC3 D878 7CDC 956D F4AB A377 1C9B ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD) iJwEAQEDAAYFAkfcT9kACgkQ/MM/0rYIoZh6VAP/UtaQaQ97nfOC7HzHgTIvr8zQ ySi82qffZsqBqQtkZdSsBcfaUeMlC7Oxl5MmHYXY47DJVNzLUXDQhbgyGhWrfBBo 62bpZgaLu63lf1lgKV+er3OGIZe+i3b1jAFpYTAjYzt/CMiPHzAoByXoXIA9PFBV 6o+fKdD4F43emgpNRO4=3D =3DVmTq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 22:42:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8226E1065673 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:42:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542298FC13; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47DC50BA.6000009@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:42:02 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Incoming Mail List References: <200803151925.m2FJPKe2084851@whoweb.com> In-Reply-To: <200803151925.m2FJPKe2084851@whoweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is packages-6.2-release? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:42:02 -0000 Incoming Mail List wrote: >> I have only ONE question. >> Where is packages-6.2-release? I have FreeBSD 6.2, and tuning it. >> Where I can download packages for my freebsd version? > > Thats a great question, and it appears that the 6.2-release packages > repository has been removed. Looking in ftp.freebsd.org I see 5-stable, > 6-stable, 6.3-release, 7-stable, 7.0-release, and 8-current. There is > no 6.2-release directory so "pkg_add -r" returns an error for any package > that you try to load. Very aggravating. > > Apparently the release team is only providing packages for the most > recent streams. I'd like to know why that is, and also why they insist > on listing "packages" under "ports". The documentation makes it very > clear there is a difference between the two. Why anyone on the release > team thinks it's intuitive to look for a ready-to-go "package" under > a "ports" directory which has been defined by documentation as something > that needs to be compiled, is a mystery to simpletons like myself. Disk space is not infinite. ftp-archive has old releases. packages are built from ports and are part of the ports collection. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 23:08:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BF9106564A for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strontium90@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090FB8FC16 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from strontium90@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so1918776nfb.33 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:08:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NUIlo+gfb2Y0S/c39r9CCe3zauj7UIY38+omsgW8RZ4=; b=R+hFOUqs+KkYR6+v299X21nLCrkCxlrN9CDCYWsK1xolsk+9WOJKFdQGamu9gp5w/tyGNhHIu1B+vaEBNvvbQUtW/BTbwul0/WbavZuXOGVnhV5iOkt2JvWv8upz7B0gfBctZUqLsb4HxAWmXxJnKv5ChSqqevTTBgahtkbmnds= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QG7BirvWx49lgXz+slpgTymSgu8xqqUkU1FbXvjbihzdyhE9T7fqji7SnjxLGXcITWwiIRzaeVcyPHreSQgZO/0xLwc0dG2vkl6rEpPecUjlzvQfLx+Gfq/+Nm2UJeJbbuAKPNZLZg0RMYNjmNh0ov/PbakJTz2ijJ6rlwZrhn8= Received: by 10.78.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr36821337hue.2.1205620919999; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?88.86.8.136? ( [88.86.8.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t10sm23089220muh.13.2008.03.15.15.41.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <47DC503D.7020008@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 00:39:57 +0200 From: Razmig K User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061027) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IPFW with user-ppp's NAT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:08:45 -0000 Hello, With IPFW enabled in the kernel, I'd like to use the NAT functionality of user-ppp instead of natd. Do I need the IPDIVERT option in the kernel and the special arrangement of divert and skipto rules in the ruleset? Or, a non-NATed ruleset (as demonstrated in handbook section 28.6.5.6) would suffice? If divert rules are necessary, what argument do I need to pass to action divert in place of natd? Thank you. //rk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 15 23:37:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173BF1065671 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C86F8FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from buhnux@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so4017687fgg.35 for ; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:37:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=0VfBiMwp/lthDKdJRHwKGCYNmATsxfH1CcSXn0xx9Uk=; b=I3wqzFXZIBnWKQoYk1YDbMQipxg9u6xl1cMRmCkUHIZy/oEXTK1amdLlatP4XeS5j6KCFBlnajRE+5MS/9BjxN33cC/j4DXQ8vlshGgCtF2XnE3seu/z43R+DqK7gZqAzkCJpzaF9viWV4gJeWM1nwdLQuQoo8Qvz7XKGsGXIBs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=im82qG9/juk8QL10WnWu/BIXNc4Ta1FrDrNhNVYBQjI3hJ8bVfAkljaQmiadk9rm2JKp2HZ4M78SE4eMJLmz9O6YxANokQYuIvNPKE2zwSscQyXGx/pJ02iCgPwZE2iBNKxAr2gtqKHwQqPJojYuh04dwMvM++ButPi+1B9Kmno= Received: by 10.82.188.15 with SMTP id l15mr31076398buf.15.1205624237886; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.116.2 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:37:17 -0400 From: "Michael Johnson" Sender: buhnux@gmail.com To: "Dino Vliet" In-Reply-To: <91913.75750.qm@web51107.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <91913.75750.qm@web51107.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7fedd01cc23ad795 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failed Upgrading 'gnucash-2.2.0' to 'gnucash-2.2.3_2' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:37:21 -0000 Thanks for the report,its fixed now. update your ports and all will work. Thanks! Michael On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:26 AM, Dino Vliet wrote: > > Hi folks, > I'm updating my ports and ran across this error message when I update > > my freebsd 6.2 amd64 system. When upgrading gnucash I get the following > error: > > > mkdir .libs > c++ -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -o .libs/ofxconnect cmdline.o > nodeparser.o ofxpartner.o ofxconnect.o -rpath=/usr/local/lib > -L/usr/local/lib ../lib/.libs/libofx.so /usr/local/lib/libosp.so > /usr/local/lib/libintl.so -lpthread /usr/local/lib/libcurl.so -L/usr/lib > /usr/local/lib/libssh2.so -lssl -lcrypto /usr/local/lib/libxml++-1.0.so/usr/local/lib/libxml2.so -lz /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -lm -Wl,--rpath > -Wl,/usr/local/lib > creating ofxconnect > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/finance/libofx/work/libofx-0.9.0 > /ofxconnect' > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/finance/libofx/work/libofx-0.9.0' > ===> Installing for libofx-0.9.0 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > ===> Checking if finance/libofx already installed > ===> libofx-0.9.0 is already installed > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of finance/libofx > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/finance/libofx. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/finance/gnucash. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/finance/gnucash. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade.36334.1 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT= > gnucash-2.2.0 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.2.0 make WITH_FAM_SYSTEM=fam > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > ! finance/gnucash (gnucash-2.2.0) (unknown build error) > > > I've tried make deinstalling libofx, reinstalling, etc etc, all with no > success. > What can I do to fix this? > /usr/ports/UPDATING doesn't have an entry for gnucash nor libofx > > Thanks in advanced, > Dino > > > > --------------------------------- > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >