From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 23:08:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3901065672 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:08:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (dong.ci0.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:2066:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F038FC19 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2VN9lsu008633; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:09:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2VN9kWg008632; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:09:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:09:45 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: Guillaume Ballet Message-ID: <20090331230945.GA8584@ci0.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locore.S question X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:08:19 -0000 On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:06:49PM +0100, Guillaume Ballet wrote: > Hello list, > Hi Guillaume, > I'm working on a FreeBSD port for the BeagleBoard. I'm starting the > kernel with u-boot and wrote my own small loader for this purpose. > That loader puts the kernel at 0x81000000 (physical address, since the > MMU is disabled at this stage). > Nice to hear you're working on that port :) > In locore.S, however, there is the following piece of code that is > executed before the MMU is disabled: > > 112 adr r7, Lunmapped > 113 bic r7, r7, #0xff000000 > 114 orr r7, r7, #PHYSADDR > > (snip, disabling MMU) > > 129 mov pc, r7 > > Since PHYSADDR is set to 0x80000000 (physical start of RAM), then r7 > is set to 0x80000000 + offset(Lunmapped) instead of 0x81000000 + > offset(Lunmapped). Of course it crashes. > > Now, bypassing the problem is relatively easy, but still I was > wondering why it is 0xff000000 instead of 0xf0000000 on line 113? > Honestly, I may have had a reason at some point, but can't remember which. So I went ahead and just committed the change, I doubt it will be a problem. Thanks for working on this ! Olivier From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 23:50:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC97106566C for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (casselton.net [63.165.140.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3F98FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:50:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casselton.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2VNoBU0060974; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:50:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=casselton.net; s=ccnMail; t=1238543411; bh=+K9fJsL7ahZZBmc5yip8iBHdddGkljbdbyS8xGNQeTA=; h=Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To; b=rpd7LE1TOb17Agkoqhp0GFtBREef4f+U/kpoVTg0exwUl5XLP2ziofrz+RBE5hXj5 HZyoF/JnUK/ah0bdRTbu5DAVJnUT//6g7MtbtMg8fhG86O7+XH9xsl3XkirZG+A1S+ mvXK+vHgYaUqfLz0Vq5y/7yq7PfVMH4HVSjkNyAE= Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by casselton.net (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n2VNoAwK060973; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:50:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:50:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <200903312350.n2VNoAwK060973@casselton.net> To: gballet@gmail.com, mlfbsd@ci0.org In-Reply-To: <20090331230945.GA8584@ci0.org> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.1.10 (casselton.net [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:50:11 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locore.S question X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:50:17 -0000 > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:06:49PM +0100, Guillaume Ballet wrote: > > Hello list, > > I'm working on a FreeBSD port for the BeagleBoard. I'm starting the > > kernel with u-boot and wrote my own small loader for this purpose. > > That loader puts the kernel at 0x81000000 (physical address, since the > > MMU is disabled at this stage). > > Nice to hear you're working on that port :) > > > In locore.S, however, there is the following piece of code that is > > executed before the MMU is disabled: > > > > 112 adr r7, Lunmapped > > 113 bic r7, r7, #0xff000000 > > 114 orr r7, r7, #PHYSADDR > > > > (snip, disabling MMU) > > > > 129 mov pc, r7 > > > > Since PHYSADDR is set to 0x80000000 (physical start of RAM), then r7 > > is set to 0x80000000 + offset(Lunmapped) instead of 0x81000000 + > > offset(Lunmapped). Of course it crashes. > > > > Now, bypassing the problem is relatively easy, but still I was > > wondering why it is 0xff000000 instead of 0xf0000000 on line 113? I was wondering why the kernel is loaded 16MB into the physical memory? --Mark. From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 09:36:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F971106566C for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (dong.ci0.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:2066:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7A68FC15 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:36:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: from dong.ci0.org (localhost.ci0.org [127.0.0.1]) by dong.ci0.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n319cH88023693; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:38:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd@dong.ci0.org) Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost) by dong.ci0.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n319cGPr023692; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:38:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mlfbsd) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:38:16 +0200 From: Olivier Houchard To: Mark Tinguely Message-ID: <20090401093815.GA23622@ci0.org> References: <20090331230945.GA8584@ci0.org> <200903312350.n2VNoAwK060973@casselton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903312350.n2VNoAwK060973@casselton.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: gballet@gmail.com, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locore.S question X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:36:43 -0000 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:50:10PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > I was wondering why the kernel is loaded 16MB into the physical memory? > Don't know in this case, but it often happens the bootloader is loaded at the beginning of the ram, and so won't let you load the kernel there. Olivier From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 10:25:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78241065670 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gballet@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f171.google.com (mail-ew0-f171.google.com [209.85.219.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCD58FC1D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 10:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gballet@gmail.com) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2773423ewy.43 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:25:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jz6r73BGfz0voHU5cpCxxQbK8xt6nNosAvO7fMUlCjI=; b=o/nCtz2IVkXmFyUsiJaYrLCjQkh/wkE7hakRJUpx4icxNdfU4oD+u95nIx+CE5j+nj ItYOvR7EbauF5XRKzVwWUFeGUjGXXoz4NmA4FSIoVGDr7aYW3KEWr71fGvOKr1Sij5y2 /CmDCnYj5XQgptiXVQPzQCnwpgs8VKHAzotrI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fY6+qF09VfTmYcTG1BeHfTmxwGeYsEeJK9ormTxczLVx4URwoHWRi3CfBp3zSjkhIM K9sEtQ+p0Jrj0hJ+uBLxeZpOjbvBmJq4QqKq85O+cO0b7HrqPhBsy44bf/O3p07t+Flb oG6fUW/UbAccRBhQBnW4LSDgFm1uBQj5JkDm8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.47.68 with SMTP id s46mr2498983web.46.1238581552232; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 03:25:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090401093815.GA23622@ci0.org> References: <20090331230945.GA8584@ci0.org> <200903312350.n2VNoAwK060973@casselton.net> <20090401093815.GA23622@ci0.org> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:25:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Guillaume Ballet To: Olivier Houchard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mark Tinguely , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locore.S question X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:25:54 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Olivier Houchard wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:50:10PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >> I was wondering why the kernel is loaded 16MB into the physical memory? >> > > Don't know in this case, but it often happens the bootloader is loaded at > the beginning of the ram, and so won't let you load the kernel there. > > Olivier > I have indeed u-boot and my intermediate kernel-loader that are loaded at the beginning of the RAM. This is not carved in stone: I will probably move the kernel-loader further away and overwrite u-boot. During platform bringup, though, I have put it here. Nothing to worry about, I was just wondering if there was some concealed requirement for the kernel to be below the first 16MB of RAM. Guillaume From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 13:41:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758111065675 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:41:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from newsletter@piekmarketing.eu) Received: from mail.piekmarketing.eu (mail.piekmarketing.eu [94.75.242.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA428FC2D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:41:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from newsletter@piekmarketing.eu) Received: from mail pickup service by mail.piekmarketing.eu with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:58:14 +0200 X-Mailing-Software: Newsletter Manager Pro by www.dfsol.com X-SID: 652647IDEND thread-index: AcmyuMED+fEqca9gTXe5C19VPzrDBg== Thread-Topic: Newsletter PIEK International Education Center I.E.C. From: "Piek International Education Centre \(I.E.C.\)" To: Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 12:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2009 10:58:14.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[C1205CE0:01C9B2B8] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Newsletter PIEK International Education Center I.E.C. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Piek International Education Centre \(I.E.C.\)" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:41:43 -0000 From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 1 18:30:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2761065674 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raj@semihalf.com) Received: from semihalf.com (semihalf.com [206.130.101.55]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71128FC23 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:30:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raj@semihalf.com) Received: from mail.semihalf.com (mail.semihalf.com [83.15.139.206]) by semihalf.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n31HsrDv003579; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:54:54 -0600 Received: from [172.16.9.100] (bny241.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.29.14.241]) by mail.semihalf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E70143B6; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:54:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <8A463EAA-0970-448C-A8D1-DB1E31AD013F@semihalf.com> From: Rafal Jaworowski To: Guillaume Ballet In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 19:54:49 +0200 References: <20090331230945.GA8584@ci0.org> <200903312350.n2VNoAwK060973@casselton.net> <20090401093815.GA23622@ci0.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) Cc: Mark Tinguely , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locore.S question X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:30:08 -0000 On 2009-04-01, at 12:25, Guillaume Ballet wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Olivier Houchard > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:50:10PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: >>> I was wondering why the kernel is loaded 16MB into the physical >>> memory? >>> >> >> Don't know in this case, but it often happens the bootloader is >> loaded at >> the beginning of the ram, and so won't let you load the kernel there. >> >> Olivier >> > > I have indeed u-boot and my intermediate kernel-loader that are loaded > at the beginning of the RAM. This is not carved in stone: I will > probably move the kernel-loader further away and overwrite u-boot. > During platform bringup, though, I have put it here. > Nothing to worry about, I was just wondering if there was some > concealed requirement for the kernel to be below the first 16MB of > RAM. Ideally, we'd have loader(8) load the kernel to the desired location (set by the user interactively) in memory, which is not in place yet, but also not a difficult thing to do. Rafal From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 08:43:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1D5106566B for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF2B8FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:43:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 36F438FC4E for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:43:36 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C82F08FC1D; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:43:35 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B1BFE39832; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:43:33 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:43:19 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Maksim Yevmenkin Message-Id: <20090403124319.7c9d488d.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Apr 3 12:43:35 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49d5cc37967002160828694 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: s3c24xx port X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:43:38 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:23:59 -0800 Maksim Yevmenkin mentioned: > hello, > > i recently acquired openmoko neo freerunner > (http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner) - "open" gsm phone. i > intend to have as much fun with it as i can :) d-board > (http://us.direct.openmoko.com/products/dboard) will be coming in next > week (hopefully). > > so, i've been doing some research on s3c24xx and freebsd (more > specifically s3c2442b as that is what my moko has). i'm aware of > Andrew Turner's http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSDs3c24xx page. i'm also > poking around projects/arm/s3c2xx0 on perforce.freebsd.org and trying > to collect as much hardware docs as i can from various moko-related > wiki pages on the net. > > arm is something new to me, but that is why i always wanted to try it out :) > > is there a some sort of a "lead" person on freebsd/s3c24xx and/or > freebsd/arm project in general? > > how does one goes about doing the work and making sure to not step on > other person's toes? > I think Andrew is a person to contact to, as he has done a lot of work on s3c24xx and continues to work on this. He has also made a great wiki page on it. The same page can probably be used to communicate on the development. I recently got the openmoko phone too and was going to help out with port but has stuck with $reallife problems. I expect to return to the development soon. It's really great you're going to work on the port too! - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAknVzDMACgkQK/VZk+smlYHs/wCcDVXrzDh+55MearCtQQa9Cqco v0IAmQFm4qn9zJ7MFrLSHeDeQ9jIJPey =uVGq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49d5cc37967002160828694! From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 09:05:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A886F106566C for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [IPv6:2001:16d8:fffb:4::abba]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595868FC08 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 09:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@FreeBSD.org) Received: from DSPAM-Daemon (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E4E18FC2B for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:05:53 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion.SpringDaemons.com (unknown [77.232.3.143]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 012788FC1D; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:05:52 +0400 (MSD) Received: from orion (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.SpringDaemons.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EDBE39832; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:05:48 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:05:44 +0400 From: Stanislav Sedov To: Gavin Mu Message-Id: <20090403130544.3e60a224.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <708189660903270220r7991ae8fq16c0ab4d25312dfa@mail.gmail.com> References: <708189660903270220r7991ae8fq16c0ab4d25312dfa@mail.gmail.com> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-XMPP: ssedov@jabber.ru X-Voice: +7 916 849 20 23 X-PGP-Fingerprint: F21E D6CC 5626 9609 6CE2 A385 2BF5 5993 EB26 9581 X-Mailer: carrier-pigeon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Apr 3 13:05:53 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 1.0000 X-DSPAM-Improbability: 1 in 98689409 chance of being spam X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0023 X-DSPAM-Signature: 49d5d171967008090317306 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does the s3c2xx0 code in perforce compilable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:05:54 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:20:30 +0800 Gavin Mu mentioned: > Hi, > > I downloaded the s3c2xx0 code from perforce web (files in > /sys/arm/s3c2xx0 and file /sys/arm/conf/FS2410), and merged to my > 7-STABLE source tree. when I run ``config FS2410'', an error was > reported that can't find option ARM32_NEW_VM_LAYOUT. does anybody know > if the code is compilable and runable? and where's the option defined > in? Thanks. > At least it was used to compile at some point in past. I suppose, the code in p4 is based on current and may not work with stable. I'd suggesting checking out the entire p4 arm repo and trying it first. - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAknV0WoACgkQK/VZk+smlYFiPgCbBeN/XEJnWfnEteD08S4U8zrB qwYAnAlCVIa26DDMk2Ege4H0FMt8C8Lz =nLMm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49d5d171967008090317306!