From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 16:01:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BD91065678 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan.slavkov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com (mail-fx0-f158.google.com [209.85.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BE68FC14 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan.slavkov@gmail.com) Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2883406fxm.43 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:01:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=YXuaOxRS7H0lVwo3mUNUOKa32j2mMnbqY9k/pZT4b+I=; b=wUgKCQA3vzKDYoOJv4YUr/fnC9k8nTQPJxVnXF6hTc9MNj5UmRxd1Xg/tjpAzDo09y SyhRGGnrm0eAjXkzzUkmP7rJsvcbbyB0PzljLO9lmkM8c0Lij/LF8fPwBJ+PLeIoxwpJ GJaQHbMKE8BUjACc/Z03xCGu2NP2aeySk+7kE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=RTkmB4V+PR6i4wy14m4FudQz6CiowNBvCVXU6N6wEVfSlNT1yniolqvk7/DrePl7CW sdB3GbuJPiZ4Ft8jz6cMKx5M66zS4vZ+aHR1uhJNaLc1NADFJzr5E2H2NM5qgUTBSZJU GJyzHfs2f0FgmJtIxducCjfMNDof1Ib4Zk680= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.111.19 with SMTP id q19mr8247885fap.58.1236180557203; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:29:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:29:17 +0200 Message-ID: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> From: Ivan Slavkov To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:01:48 -0000 Hello all! Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor (two quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the proceesor in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the new ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. - Ivan From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 16:45:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35E7106566C for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: from dns.magraf.pl (bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.18.236.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA148FC24 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: (qmail 40984 invoked by uid 0); 4 Mar 2009 16:18:25 -0000 Received: from 91.194.159.144 (tomaszd@paraklet.net@91.194.159.144) by first.magraf.pl (envelope-from , uid 0) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.94.1/9065. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:0(91.194.159.144):SA:0(-0.7/5.0):. Processed in 0.363724 secs); 04 Mar 2009 16:18:25 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (tomaszd@paraklet.net@91.194.159.144) by dns.magraf.pl with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 4 Mar 2009 16:18:24 -0000 Message-ID: <49AEA9C8.8000608@paraklet.net> Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:18:16 +0000 From: td User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Slavkov References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:45:09 -0000 Ivan Slavkov wrote: > Hello all! > Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor (two > quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the proceesor > in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the new > ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. > cant you simply disable it in the bios? > - Ivan -- tomasz dereszynski From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 17:24:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEB7106566B for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhollo@cisco.com) Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2D98FC13 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:24:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikhollo@cisco.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,301,1233532800"; d="scan'208";a="39001672" Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2009 16:56:12 +0000 Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n24GuCsI017631 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:56:12 -0500 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n24GuCej018865 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:56:12 GMT Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:56:12 -0500 Received: from dhcp-64-101-131-181.cisco.com ([64.101.131.181]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:56:12 -0500 Message-Id: From: Mike Holloway To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <49AEA9C8.8000608@paraklet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:56:13 -0600 References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> <49AEA9C8.8000608@paraklet.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2009 16:56:12.0205 (UTC) FILETIME=[1F87E5D0:01C99CEA] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=843; t=1236185772; x=1237049772; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mikhollo@cisco.com; z=From:=20Mike=20Holloway=20 |Subject:=20Re=3A=20dual=20cpu=20question |Sender:=20 |To:=20freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org; bh=WBI2/u1Vm1Kx5wnWup+1ffwoy9sN64/Z5EIHfOp4xSk=; b=V1X8sWe1lTOrn2KseOV6zG/1EeSwvbUc8Q1ITGDG4NWKCNARFr8uEOyz1g FgD0qWov8QOoUSoTT/47vHz/gEoaQU0iwobFPFZRO6iauElQAyAdYvMGDcMr 7IKcB9tjpf; Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=mikhollo@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; ); Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:24:47 -0000 Possibly use the cputask(2) utility which should be available in 7.1- RELEASE. -mike On Mar 4, 2009, at 10:18 AM, td wrote: > Ivan Slavkov wrote: >> Hello all! >> Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two- >> processor (two >> quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the >> proceesor >> in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with >> the new >> ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. >> > > cant you simply disable it in the bios? > >> - Ivan > > -- > tomasz dereszynski > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 18:40:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B6A10656C2 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan.slavkov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com (mail-fx0-f158.google.com [209.85.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92618FC15 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan.slavkov@gmail.com) Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2946062fxm.43 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:39:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nq6pi4LXQnpdZcpxzQ9Xz1WduKwtdRLafB6R86qpsxw=; b=JQWDZiIIQE3oeoOSyPUCKyFQpJEDhA5IXtcZDfHwUBoZjCRZBjjkfDlG2AlewpVgAF 6cwdJEgxJzkMm45KqtaRMPZNVgXEO9+OLItNyEAY4GxvqdkW2mlqTSc9/eM/dNL4Sp6l rZRccRwtw/vl5KdxLHZcqriaKLb4F+Vbn/d00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LY5UbW8DMmfYiMS68Wy2a5vi3EQcdVfoNJAze5oyEF3Sm0WYmm4xHa3iRHe36egUHd orUw8VnEN12QXjhw8awqwR1bZ160oWmgza/o/6oAuBxTnCfSC/gJ42LuEe6ojdKd5P/6 05XPSX+MazBs0LOFKG83T3nNUrwLNUxLe8pjE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.126.10 with SMTP id a10mr176895fas.17.1236191998949; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:39:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:39:58 +0200 Message-ID: <60bb96a10903041039l6c8aa0ag72abd676124e127a@mail.gmail.com> From: Ivan Slavkov To: John Cagle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:40:02 -0000 I haven't tried this yet. I will try. The main Idea is to have system with two good-working on FreeBSD. On this stage I cannot have it :( On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:33 PM, John Cagle wrote: > Why don't you rebuild the kernel without SMP support? Then it will only > use one CPU. > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ivan Slavkov wrote: > >> Hello all! >> Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor >> (two >> quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the >> proceesor >> in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the >> new >> ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. >> >> - Ivan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 18:54:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE1F1065674 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcagle@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A5F8FC0C for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcagle@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so2807379qwe.7 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:54:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=obXODs2DfUkBv4EkcYSaDghWtVK7dR0aInI7n3DI3k4=; b=Fy2WFJtPgfF7rjNbavnQuhDQS1R1tHWy1ITsZXg9gJD4oaUZEX4apnKcBWgJflqXev H1/B0P7yuTl6FuWeS+d1Ac69Ch3fNNAWAV7qp/K/OTdMTCaCsoQEVKgqQnarZ8hGDDqz +iKnvJlmY7ZnvKqHs8st0cJoUpeL17kQE/4l0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JdiUud6ZfUhE3QENaV7Di1FsIKg4wRMAfBKeFm1/LUCXjew83kEjZIMWhGuHQJ2Yli XKVsQxyD6gbzFbal0QYsMNG17+wa0Cl1BzdejLrRUv+9plPsmSabkWdz9J/cfZirxRmf KckVWm9RFbct5MVRdfjwM+Uetl/Xbu0LvZ97g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.14.204 with SMTP id h12mr337270qaa.136.1236191626010; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:33:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:33:45 -0600 Message-ID: <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com> From: John Cagle To: Ivan Slavkov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:54:37 -0000 Why don't you rebuild the kernel without SMP support? Then it will only use one CPU. On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ivan Slavkov wrote: > Hello all! > Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor > (two > quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the > proceesor > in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the new > ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. > > - Ivan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 23:25:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623C81065670 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulf@alameda.net) Received: from mail.alameda.net (mail.alameda.net [194.55.105.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D01F8FC12 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulf@alameda.net) Received: by mail.alameda.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 46E651CC80; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:56:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:56:02 -0800 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: Ivan Slavkov Message-ID: <20090304225602.GI51533@evil.alameda.net> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1236812163.61548@/ucXkJgdvxCJmiAXN1kPTQ X-ANI-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 46E651CC80.179C4 X-ANI-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ANI-MailScanner-From: ulf@alameda.net Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:25:11 -0000 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:29:17PM +0200, Ivan Slavkov wrote: > Hello all! > Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor (two > quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the proceesor > in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the new > ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. > > - Ivan You should be able to disable a processor from the bios (F9 prompt). -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204 You can find my resume at: http://www.Alameda.net/~ulf/resume.html From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 23:39:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF5B1065673 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcagle@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE3F8FC17 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcagle@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so2918143qwe.7 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:39:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gQhdfTTOef2lIQLrnoVR18CfMG4WF+QAqYv1cnxZZ1E=; b=RzaKO6lecEXqGo4aXtFfZQ+7vLNyDBVA7BfXywLia3K8gK20iwB1vdhWVunWCkg2Ih /ST2aV8fXTLH4v6kDk9NfF5Ja32G3ZLzHxaZTuisL4kxCIHpakoZF4uQmWsp2wkpT48z m7oDcD1qfryxxp9bnHFUVBamGP20mAoHfARK4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=H4Vpy3rfwAz7GY9rH+8TBYjxiAUSMua/CXztFy9pdHu2Gux4CB04FzOwFdtWqPXA6R zdQzM1bSvU4gST0Kb2X+fCyVSCoZvhPMmEGeh/0Ajz6ekpPnba+zDMRIzlS6koP3iIUL AgEFgpJOlJXF+IEgEvQ9k/5E5TtVUYhT06g5M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.11.17 with SMTP id r17mr797285qar.346.1236209986216; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:39:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090304225602.GI51533@evil.alameda.net> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> <20090304225602.GI51533@evil.alameda.net> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:39:46 -0600 Message-ID: <6863f0c90903041539v3ced4fe7v35cd45789cc3b5cb@mail.gmail.com> From: John Cagle To: ulf@alameda.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:39:47 -0000 On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:29:17PM +0200, Ivan Slavkov wrote: > > Hello all! > > Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor > (two > > quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the > proceesor > > in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the > new > > ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. > > > > - Ivan > > You should be able to disable a processor from the bios (F9 prompt). > > -- > Regards, Ulf. > > The ProLiant BIOS doesn't offer a processor disable option as far as I know. From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 5 00:31:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3544E106568A for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulf@alameda.net) Received: from mail.alameda.net (mail.alameda.net [194.55.105.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBC78FC1A for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulf@alameda.net) Received: by mail.alameda.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EC381CC80; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:31:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:31:00 -0800 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: John Cagle Message-ID: <20090305003100.GJ51533@evil.alameda.net> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> <20090304225602.GI51533@evil.alameda.net> <6863f0c90903041539v3ced4fe7v35cd45789cc3b5cb@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6863f0c90903041539v3ced4fe7v35cd45789cc3b5cb@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1236817863.84735@qlqV+4NqsLEcwpGQFliEZA X-ANI-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-ID: 5EC381CC80.CD66B X-ANI-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ANI-MailScanner-From: ulf@alameda.net Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:31:04 -0000 On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:39:46PM -0600, John Cagle wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 05:29:17PM +0200, Ivan Slavkov wrote: > > Hello all! > > Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor > (two > > quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the > proceesor > > in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the > new > > ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. > > > > - Ivan > > You should be able to disable a processor from the bios (F9 prompt). > > -- > Regards, Ulf. > > > > The ProLiant BIOS doesn't offer a processor disable option as far as I know. Hmmm, the DL360 g5 I just checked indeed doesn't. Don't remember on which server I last looked for it and it had it. Might have been an older DL58x or a blade. -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-865-0204 You can find my resume at: http://www.Alameda.net/~ulf/resume.html