From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 22:13:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8367106566C; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88E3150689; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FE7910C.6070807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 15:13:32 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120624 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Kozlov References: <4FE6F010.80609@FreeBSD.org> <20120624123714.GA83824@ravenloft.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20120624123714.GA83824@ravenloft.kiev.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, mi@aldan.algebra.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X11BASE still in use in ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:13:56 -0000 On 06/24/2012 05:37, Alex Kozlov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 03:46:40AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> I noticed a failure in one of my ports today while doing an upgrade, and >> was embarrassed to find that it was due to my port still using X11BASE. >> That led me to do a quick grep of the tree, which seems to indicate that >> there are a non-zero number of uses of it which seem to be erroneous: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/x11base-ports.txt >> >> Note, some of these are actually Ok, I haven't made an attempt to filter >> them out yet. >> >> Is there any interest in cleaning these up? Should we restore the >> definition of X11BASE until all of the ports that are using it are fixed? >> >> I'm kind of surprised by this problem, since the usual way of removing >> something like this is to make sure all of the consumers have been fixed >> first. > I have done a basic analysis. Ports that need to be fixed ('?' - not sure, > '' - should be deleted): http://people.freebsd.org/~ak/x11base.log Thanks Alex! I fixed the obvious ones. Of the ports@ ones, ports/games/ezquake needs a look, since it probably needs more than just a quick edit. I added emulation@ so that they can look at the linux-base ports on your list. It wasn't clear to me how/if those should be changed. And ports/math/wingz3 needs a look too, I'm not sure what _X11BASE_ is about there. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection