From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 12:50:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D4810656D1 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwest@ezwind.net) Received: from ezwind.net (bobby.ezwind.net [209.145.140.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3418FC16 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from LENOVOD6B52A6B by ezwind.net (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id 56-md50000135217.msg for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:50:20 -0500 From: "Jay West" To: "'Mark Felder'" , "'moto kawasaki'" , "'Egoitz Aurrekoetxea'" References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:50:16 -0500 Message-ID: <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHxWby8upHQXKmKvSMOkvVwyLCuCAH/pSmwAkgpUVkBldnuGQOAYma9ArzuchaWrXruIA== Content-Language: en-us X-Authenticated-Sender: jwest@ezwind.net X-Spam-Processed: gateway.ezwind.net, Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:50:20 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 71.81.129.230 X-Return-Path: jwest@ezwind.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 12:50:49 -0000 Just tried the migration scripts on 64bit FreeBSD 9.0-Release & 9.1-Beta XENHVM kernel with PV drivers. Seems to work under Xenserver 6.0 and Xenserver 5.6SP2. I can't say how awesome that is, thank you VERY much to the people who worked on it. Not having stable virtualization with migration for FreeBSD under Xenserver has been a severe shortcoming for this FreeBSD zealot, finally we can roll out a new infrastructure with our preferred OS. Questions: 1) on the stock 64bit 9.0 & 9.1-beta XENHVM kernels, we still had the boot problem where after installing the kernel and rebooting, the boot failed as being unable to find the boot device. We had to pass a boot string of ad0p2 instead of the default ada0p2, and then edit fstab accordingly. I assume others here had to do that as well? 2) I'm sure this will show a lack of understanding on my part, but I'm just curious about the xen-tools port that has been in the ports collection for a little while. As per the pdf on the migration/suspend scripts, this needs to be installed first. I would think the current port - being called "xen-tools", would/should include these migration/suspend scripts. It's not xen-tools (in Citrix parlance) without that capability. So, is this a case of the new scripts just "finish off" the work that went into the current xen-tools script and the xen-tools port in the ports collection is functionally incomplete? I guess I'm unclear as to the history/relationship/status of the xen-tools port and these migration/suspend scripts. 3) In some of my googling on 64 bit XENHVM "how-to's", one of them (can't find it at the moment) mentioned 64 bit Freebsd not working right under Xen with regards to SMP, and the how-to offered several patches to disable SMP amongst other related items. To run the new migration/suspend scripts, did other people here need to use those patches? Jay West EZwind.net PO Box 460474 Saint Louis, MO 63146 Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 Fax: (314) 558-9284 jwest@ezwind.net -------------------------------------------- This e-mail transmission may contain information that is proprietary, privileged and/or confidential and is intended exclusively for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, copying, retention or disclosure by any person other than the intended recipient or the intended recipient's designees is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient or their designee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 12 16:13:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6DF106566B for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79F88FC08 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:12:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Cc:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=AbDjlLc4uM5vDpyRffe1ZiQwazACHouEFE/LYzEwniE=; b=XyEiJ1LnI49RUmhAmuq9m66M6rVVLnDBEo/LPrj2KuwTqognFNwVepEQBx+IncUYG2Rc5k0g06h0xRC4dKWDIrrnd7hFmltdK63bNHQxILbFbK7DU62FIdB2wdy8p4v9; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T0amb-00069A-3x; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:12:54 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1344787965-41577-41576/5/60; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:12:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:12:41 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:13:00 -0000 On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:50:16 -0500, Jay West wrote: > Questions: > 1) on the stock 64bit 9.0 & 9.1-beta XENHVM kernels, we still had the > boot > problem where after installing the kernel and rebooting, the boot failed > as > being unable to find the boot device. We had to pass a boot string of > ad0p2 > instead of the default ada0p2, and then edit fstab accordingly. I assume > others here had to do that as well? > Yes, but I think that's because with the XENHVM kernel the disks are using a different driver. There's a difference between the ad and ada drivers. > 2) I'm sure this will show a lack of understanding on my part, but I'm > just > curious about the xen-tools port that has been in the ports collection > for a > little while. As per the pdf on the migration/suspend scripts, this > needs to > be installed first. I would think the current port - being called > "xen-tools", would/should include these migration/suspend scripts. It's > not > xen-tools (in Citrix parlance) without that capability. So, is this a > case > of the new scripts just "finish off" the work that went into the current > xen-tools script and the xen-tools port in the ports collection is > functionally incomplete? I guess I'm unclear as to the > history/relationship/status of the xen-tools port and these > migration/suspend scripts. This is likely where it will show up. I've been talking to the ports@ team and it seems to make sense that we include it in that port. > > 3) In some of my googling on 64 bit XENHVM "how-to's", one of them (can't > find it at the moment) mentioned 64 bit Freebsd not working right under > Xen > with regards to SMP, and the how-to offered several patches to disable > SMP > amongst other related items. To run the new migration/suspend scripts, > did > other people here need to use those patches? > I have a feeling this is an old/resolved issue as I've not seen it yet. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 01:54:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D172106566B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moto@kawasaki3.org) Received: from kawasaki3.org (blackpearl.kawasaki3.org [173.230.157.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6450B8FC19 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:54:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [113.157.198.194]) (Authenticated sender: moto) by kawasaki3.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C0CC1CD44; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:53:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:53:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120813.105332.66169511.moto@kawasaki3.org> To: egoitz@ramattack.net From: moto kawasaki In-Reply-To: References: <1344606990.2871.7.camel@mactoo> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Face: )._4~w!_D$r6qNS0+; nS|]WNeI4f3o)QnH[ItB[esXuc$~hQ$.,?}$SnLe/[24Hao%^q/Is 'SJtZe#21h;7z;q+iyj[^%7\46.Gg-t7.px<}L-f_:P+6i4-a{DIL[ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 01:54:05 -0000 Hi Egoitz-san, Thank you very much for your reply!! Year, I've tried that in xe-update-guest-attrs: xenstore_write_cached "attr/PVAddons/MajorVersion" "6" xenstore_write_cached "attr/PVAddons/MinorVersion" "0" xenstore_write_cached "attr/PVAddons/MicroVersion" "2" But still XenCenter recognises it as old version of xenserver-tools. >>> was Xenserver 6.2.0 wasn't it?? >> No, it was 6.0.2. I haven't had a chance to figure this out as I >> don't have a 6.0.2 XenServer available right now. This is true. XenServer version is 6.0.2. just for clarification. Best Regards, -- moto kawasaki 090-2464-8454 From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 02:20:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946D1106566C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moto@kawasaki3.org) Received: from kawasaki3.org (blackpearl.kawasaki3.org [173.230.157.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8FE8FC0C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [113.157.198.194]) (Authenticated sender: moto) by kawasaki3.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB65A1CD44 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:18:32 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120813.111832.209986134.moto@kawasaki3.org> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org From: moto kawasaki In-Reply-To: References: <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Face: )._4~w!_D$r6qNS0+; nS|]WNeI4f3o)QnH[ItB[esXuc$~hQ$.,?}$SnLe/[24Hao%^q/Is 'SJtZe#21h;7z;q+iyj[^%7\46.Gg-t7.px<}L-f_:P+6i4-a{DIL[ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 02:20:19 -0000 Hi Mark-san, Thank you very much for your patch. I've applied that patch already, and seems fix the problem. Thank you very very much!! Sincerely, >> Let me check this please but surely it would be something easy to >> solve or something that is not complete on the installation.... > > He's using my modified version of the xen tools scripts and I just > caught this bug this morning. It appears to be fixed here: > > https://github.com/felderado/freebsd-xen-tools-scripts/commit/9250a10ae8a1ab1045f15964bd1cfce1124423bd#src/usr/local/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs -- moto kawasaki 090-2464-8454 From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 08:08:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA72A106564A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krichy@tvnetwork.hu) Received: from krichy.tvnetwork.hu (unknown [IPv6:2a01:be00:0:2::10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394A88FC15 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD36D20156; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krichy.tvnetwork.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CF72001C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:08:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:08:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Richard Kojedzinszky To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: time jumps in xen amd64/hvm instance X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:08:31 -0000 Dear developers/users, I am still facing with time jump problems. Did somebody detect same issues, or only I am doing something wrong. My dom0 is a debian squeeze, my domU is a freebsd-9.0, amd64, kernel compiled by myself. Currently I cannot find the exact steps needed to reproduce the problem, but unfortunately it happens. Actually, in the past weekend it did also, when the server had lower load than in workdays. Where should I look further? Any ideas? Thanks, Kojedzinszky Richard Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:57:09 +0200 (CEST) > From: Richard Kojedzinszky > To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: time jumps in xen amd64/hvm instance > > > just an update, as I remember, this happened to 8.2 bsd in paravirtualized > mode also. > > > Kojedzinszky Richard > Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 21:10:52 +0200 (CEST) >> From: Richard Kojedzinszky >> To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org >> Subject: time jumps in xen amd64/hvm instance >> >> Dear Xen users, >> >> I have a strange problem, my hvm instance sometimes jumps time forward. I >> made a little script to monitor this, and I am attaching its result also. I >> have no clues where to look, why this jump happens, but of course it is not >> normal. And as I have kern.securelevel at 2, ntp cannot correct this. >> >> Could somebody help? >> >> The amd64hvmntp.sh script is run by cron every minute. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Kojedzinszky Richard >> Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 11:07:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848921065688 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550768FC22 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7DB7PI5007324 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:07:25 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7DB7OXh007322 for freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:07:24 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:07:24 GMT Message-Id: <201208131107.q7DB7OXh007322@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:07:25 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/166174 xen [xen] Problems ROOT MOUNT ERROR o kern/165418 xen [xen] Problems mounting root filesystem from XENHVM o kern/164630 xen [xen] XEN HVM kernel: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: stil o kern/164450 xen [xen] Failed to install FreeeBSD 9.0-RELEASE from CD i o kern/162677 xen [xen] FreeBSD not compatible with "Current Stable Xen" o kern/161318 xen [xen] sysinstall crashes with floating point exception o kern/155468 xen [xen] Xen PV i386 multi-kernel CPU system is not worki o kern/155353 xen [xen] [patch] put "nudging TOD" message under boot_ver o kern/154833 xen [xen]: xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.2RC3 i386, XEN kernel. o kern/154473 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386, XEN kernel. Not o kern/154472 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386 xen kernel reboot o kern/154428 xen [xen] xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performan o kern/153674 xen [xen] i386/XEN idle thread shows wrong percentages o kern/153672 xen [xen] [panic] i386/XEN panics under heavy fork load o kern/153620 xen [xen] Xen guest system clock drifts in AWS EC2 (FreeBS o kern/153477 xen [xen] XEN pmap code abuses vm page queue lock o kern/153150 xen [xen] xen/ec2: disable checksum offloading on interfac o kern/152228 xen [xen] [panic] Xen/PV panic with machdep.idle_mwait=1 o kern/144629 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143398 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143340 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor f kern/143069 xen [xen] [panic] Xen Kernel Panic - Memory modified after f kern/135667 xen ufs filesystem corruption on XEN DomU system f kern/135421 xen [xen] FreeBSD Xen PVM DomU network failure - netfronc. f kern/135178 xen [xen] Xen domU outgoing data transfer stall when TSO i p kern/135069 xen [xen] FreeBSD-current/Xen SMP doesn't function at all f i386/124516 xen [xen] FreeBSD-CURRENT Xen Kernel Segfaults when config o kern/118734 xen [xen] FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 and FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 4 fail to b 28 problems total. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 07:00:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BA71065672 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:00:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop03.sare.net (proxypop03.sare.net [194.30.0.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDAA8FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:00:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.244.200.218] (unknown [77.209.226.177]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A93E9DCA03 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:00:09 +0200 (CEST) References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:00:25 +0200 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:00:42 -0000 El 12/08/2012, a las 18:12, Mark Felder escribi=C3=B3: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 07:50:16 -0500, Jay West wrote: >=20 >> Questions: >> 1) on the stock 64bit 9.0 & 9.1-beta XENHVM kernels, we still had the boo= t >> problem where after installing the kernel and rebooting, the boot failed a= s >> being unable to find the boot device. We had to pass a boot string of ad0= p2 >> instead of the default ada0p2, and then edit fstab accordingly. I assume >> others here had to do that as well? >>=20 >=20 > Yes, but I think that's because with the XENHVM kernel the disks are using= a different driver. There's a difference between the ad and ada drivers. That's it...=20 >=20 >> 2) I'm sure this will show a lack of understanding on my part, but I'm j= ust >> curious about the xen-tools port that has been in the ports collection fo= r a >> little while. As per the pdf on the migration/suspend scripts, this needs= to >> be installed first. I would think the current port - being called >> "xen-tools", would/should include these migration/suspend scripts. It's n= ot >> xen-tools (in Citrix parlance) without that capability. So, is this a cas= e >> of the new scripts just "finish off" the work that went into the current >> xen-tools script and the xen-tools port in the ports collection is >> functionally incomplete? I guess I'm unclear as to the >> history/relationship/status of the xen-tools port and these >> migration/suspend scripts. >=20 > This is likely where it will show up. I've been talking to the ports@ team= and it seems to make sense that we include it in that port. I suppose should be different ports... Xenstore is a Xen system capability b= ut the Citrix rules for working with the xapi and xencenter are just for Cit= rix's Xen systems... You don't need them if you're virtualizing in a Gentoo d= om0 for example... I'll create a different port for it in September/October.= .. Which of course install by dependency xen-tools's port... But should not b= e the same port. >=20 >>=20 >> 3) In some of my googling on 64 bit XENHVM "how-to's", one of them (can't= >> find it at the moment) mentioned 64 bit Freebsd not working right under X= en >> with regards to SMP, and the how-to offered several patches to disable SM= P >> amongst other related items. To run the new migration/suspend scripts, di= d >> other people here need to use those patches? >>=20 >=20 Nope and I'm running some big mail systems with it... I haven't seen nothing= related to smp... Unless untill now... > I have a feeling this is an old/resolved issue as I've not seen it yet. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 07:03:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14002106566C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop03.sare.net (proxypop03.sare.net [194.30.0.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18448FC16 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.244.200.218] (unknown [77.209.225.209]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D0919DCA03; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:03:03 +0200 (CEST) References: <1344606990.2871.7.camel@mactoo> <20120813.105332.66169511.moto@kawasaki3.org> In-Reply-To: <20120813.105332.66169511.moto@kawasaki3.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <9846174F-74A2-443E-BF75-737B2EE9D19E@ramattack.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:03:20 +0200 To: moto kawasaki Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:03:29 -0000 I was assuming here you were using my script's... Well anyway all right if s= olved.. But what are you then running now? El 13/08/2012, a las 03:53, moto kawasaki escribi=C3=B3= : >=20 > Hi Egoitz-san, >=20 > Thank you very much for your reply!! >=20 > Year, I've tried that in xe-update-guest-attrs: >=20 > xenstore_write_cached "attr/PVAddons/MajorVersion" "6" > xenstore_write_cached "attr/PVAddons/MinorVersion" "0" > xenstore_write_cached "attr/PVAddons/MicroVersion" "2" >=20 > But still XenCenter recognises it as old version of xenserver-tools. >=20 >=20 >=20 >>>> was Xenserver 6.2.0 wasn't it?? >>> No, it was 6.0.2. I haven't had a chance to figure this out as I >>> don't have a 6.0.2 XenServer available right now. >=20 > This is true. XenServer version is 6.0.2. just for clarification. >=20 >=20 > Best Regards, >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > moto kawasaki 090-2464-8454 From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 12:22:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1497F106564A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06648FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:22:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Message-Id:Cc:To:Date:From:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:References; bh=YbEPXb8CKoBKuFmYqPskNcxjfGcK+1sz5eBifxCfLjM=; b=k4kHDtFua3z478dkzXjwUbw1YJ0bkX+XkL009X6vApGKsLLW3kxu+Gk10Lox/Vpumsg31aL9bKOOiuWTovcCoP2BLkg23u8rJ4H5S/SKBES2h/aLiDGI0DKHeuUd5Y0j; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T1G8x-000MIL-A0; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:22:44 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1344946957-41577-41576/5/61; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:22:37 +0000 References: <1344606990.2871.7.camel@mactoo> <20120813.105332.66169511.moto@kawasaki3.org> <9846174F-74A2-443E-BF75-737B2EE9D19E@ramattack.net> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <9846174F-74A2-443E-BF75-737B2EE9D19E@ramattack.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Mark Felder Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:22:15 -0500 To: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre , moto kawasaki Message-Id: X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:22:48 -0000 Egoitz, I've included a link to my github repository several times now. = I've taken your scripts and made many changes: - no more BASH - some scripts have been completely removed (integrated elsewhere) - no more need for /etc/freebsd-version or temp files in /procfalse - rc script is completely rewritten and compliant with freebsd standards It is much more simplified and I expect this week I will get time to = finish merging everything (except the daemon wrapper) into a single = shell script. There's no need to have so many different scripts to = accomplish this. https://github.com/felderado/freebsd-xen-tools-scripts Please look at what I've done and feel free to contribute additional = changes. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 13:56:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68FE106566B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCFD8FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Cc:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=+WL2aHKwKbO+9IRJFOxdGBCZwqNRKZ9MarspuUHkvTY=; b=aNVGic2yl87HvnMO/oFFpR0lIMA5hY/NmbGGOS9Ks+K7er4z+1Ja5gDK0B8rTzWuJ7a/Xsg/F+B63PYifcGsCx2JccjbaqIznebkBQOYacYh8an5GrZh0TMQZ3HnsGvL; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T1Hbj-000BTT-2Y; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:56:31 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1344952585-41577-41576/5/63; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:56:25 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 13:56:32 -0000 On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:00:25 -0500, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote: > I suppose should be different ports... Xenstore is a Xen system > capability but the Citrix rules for working with the xapi and xencenter > are just for Citrix's Xen systems... You don't need them if you're > virtualizing in a Gentoo dom0 for example... I'll create a different > port for it in September/October... Which of course install by > dependency xen-tools's port... But should not be the same port. The xen-tools should include this work. It has nothing to do with what dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enable it in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if necessary. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely separate port. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 14:10:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1685106564A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwest@ezwind.net) Received: from ezwind.net (bobby.ezwind.net [209.145.140.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AD78FC08 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from LENOVOD6B52A6B by ezwind.net (MDaemon.PRO.v8.1.3.R) with ESMTP id 23-md50000135369.msg for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:10:12 -0500 From: "Jay West" To: "'Mark Felder'" , References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:10:11 -0500 Message-ID: <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHxWby8upHQXKmKvSMOkvVwyLCuCAH/pSmwAkgpUVkBldnuGQOAYma9ArzuchYCXbz64AIbNr4LAYYnc54Bv8b5/5ZyyeXQ Content-Language: en-us X-Authenticated-Sender: jwest@ezwind.net X-Spam-Processed: gateway.ezwind.net, Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:10:12 -0500 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 66.128.111.62 X-Return-Path: jwest@ezwind.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: RE: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:10:21 -0000 Mark Felder wrote... ---------------------- The xen-tools {port} should include this work. It has nothing to do with = what dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't = enable it in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port = if necessary. There's just no sound reason why this should be a = completely separate port. ______________ Wholeheartedly agree. Jay West, President Open Source Associates, LLC PO Box 460454 Saint Louis, MO 63146 Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 Fax: (314) 558-9284 jwest@opensourceassociates.com From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 07:25:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54944106566B for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:25:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop03.sare.net (proxypop03.sare.net [194.30.0.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095AD8FC0C for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.234.33.120] (unknown [77.209.225.221]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11F3E9DCA8A; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:24:55 +0200 (CEST) References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net> In-Reply-To: <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 09:25:10 +0200 To: Jay West Cc: "" Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:25:27 -0000 El 14/08/2012, a las 16:10, "Jay West" escribi=C3=B3: > Mark Felder wrote... > ---------------------- > The xen-tools {port} should include this work. It has nothing to do with w= hat dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enable i= t in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if necessar= y. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely separate por= t. > ______________ >=20 > Wholeheartedly agree. >=20 > Jay West, President > Open Source Associates, LLC > PO Box 460454 > Saint Louis, MO 63146 > Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 > Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 > Fax: (314) 558- Hi, It depend's if the dom0 uses xapi or not for being managed... And this scrip= ts mainly maintain xenstore database for info to be exchanged with XenCenter= a citrix managing product, this is the main reason because I assume that ba= re xen-tools shouldn't include XenServerTools's xenstore management scripts f= or xenstore to be useful with XenCenter. Perhaps using an option for includi= ng them or not in the port could be valid too... But I assume the mere fact o= f using Xentools should not really assume we're going to usr Citrix products= ... This is my opinion. Best Regards, From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 07:41:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A45106564A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Anatoliy.Poloz@onetelecom.od.ua) Received: from main.merlin.com.ua (mail.onetelecom.od.ua [91.194.72.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49108FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.67.100] (unknown [192.168.67.100]) by main.merlin.com.ua (Postmaster) with ESMTP id 3400C5E34C6 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:34:05 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <502B50B8.7010504@onetelecom.od.ua> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:33:12 +0300 From: "Anatoliy.Poloz" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "" References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Anatoliy.Poloz@onetelecom.od.ua List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:41:47 -0000 15.08.2012 10:25, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre пишет: > > El 14/08/2012, a las 16:10, "Jay West" escribió: > >> Mark Felder wrote... >> ---------------------- >> The xen-tools {port} should include this work. It has nothing to do with what dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enable it in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if necessary. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely separate port. >> ______________ >> >> Wholeheartedly agree. >> >> Jay West, President >> Open Source Associates, LLC >> PO Box 460454 >> Saint Louis, MO 63146 >> Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 >> Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 >> Fax: (314) 558- > > Hi, > > It depend's if the dom0 uses xapi or not for being managed... And this scripts mainly maintain xenstore database for info to be exchanged with XenCenter a citrix managing product, this is the main reason because I assume that bare xen-tools shouldn't include XenServerTools's xenstore management scripts for xenstore to be useful with XenCenter. Perhaps using an option for including them or not in the port could be valid too... But I assume the mere fact of using Xentools should not really assume we're going to usr Citrix products... This is my opinion. "Xen Cloud Platform" use XenServerTool's too. > > Best Regards, > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- //wbr Anatoliy Poloz From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 15 15:01:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F441065673 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop03.sare.net (proxypop03.sare.net [194.30.0.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C866A8FC1C for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.234.33.120] (77.209.224.219.red-acceso.airtel.net [77.209.224.219]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C87D79DC5C4; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:00:56 +0200 (CEST) References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <000001cd7889$05e15ac0$11a41040$@ezwind.net> <001b01cd7a26$84b62d50$8e2287f0$@ezwind.net> <502B50B8.7010504@onetelecom.od.ua> In-Reply-To: <502B50B8.7010504@onetelecom.od.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <5AAA9875-3279-429F-B264-A700064B5753@ramattack.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:01:09 +0200 To: "Anatoliy.Poloz@onetelecom.od.ua" Cc: "" Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:01:23 -0000 El 15/08/2012, a las 09:33, "Anatoliy.Poloz" escribi=C3=B3: > 15.08.2012 10:25, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82= : >>=20 >> El 14/08/2012, a las 16:10, "Jay West" escribi=C3=B3: >>=20 >>> Mark Felder wrote... >>> ---------------------- >>> The xen-tools {port} should include this work. It has nothing to do with= what dom0 you're using -- if you don't have a use for this just don't enabl= e it in rc.conf. We could even make it an optional KNOB in the port if neces= sary. There's just no sound reason why this should be a completely separate p= ort. >>> ______________ >>>=20 >>> Wholeheartedly agree. >>>=20 >>> Jay West, President >>> Open Source Associates, LLC >>> PO Box 460454 >>> Saint Louis, MO 63146 >>> Voice: (314) 262-4143 ext 1000 >>> Toll Free: (866) 343-2589 >>> Fax: (314) 558- >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> It depend's if the dom0 uses xapi or not for being managed... And this sc= ripts mainly maintain xenstore database for info to be exchanged with XenCen= ter a citrix managing product, this is the main reason because I assume that= bare xen-tools shouldn't include XenServerTools's xenstore management scrip= ts for xenstore to be useful with XenCenter. Perhaps using an option for inc= luding them or not in the port could be valid too... But I assume the mere f= act of using Xentools should not really assume we're going to usr Citrix pro= ducts... This is my opinion. > "Xen Cloud Platform" use XenServerTool's too. I know and in fact my scripts are tested and working at xcp (as is indicated= in xen.org wiki). But I assume the central idea of what I'm trying to expre= ss is understood. >>=20 >> Best Regards, >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 > --=20 > //wbr Anatoliy Poloz >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 22:01:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3444C1065673 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop04.sare.net (proxypop04.sare.net [194.30.0.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BAE8FC15 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.10.3] (unknown [31.4.246.34]) by proxypop04.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1A39DC620; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea To: moto kawasaki In-Reply-To: References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: etxea Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:01:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1345154501.3738.2.camel@mactoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: egoitz@ramattack.net List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:01:18 -0000 On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 10:31 +0200, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: > Hi!! > > > > El 10/08/2012, a las 03:37, moto kawasaki escribió: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for your quick reply! > > This is moto again. > > > > From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea > > Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts > > Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 22:50:18 +0200 > > > >>> 1) XenCenter shows warning as; > >>> "XenServer Tools out of date (version 6.0 installed)" > > > >> I suppose you'll have to have 6 0 2 in three *version xenstore > >>> attribs... Make some tests... Not just change the micro... > > > > I couldn't find any line in the scripts except for micro version > > mentioned before... X-( > > > > Let me check I'll tell you something today... Should be easy... > > > > >>> 2) "Shutdown" button on XenCenter works but doesn't complete. > > > >> Yep just hit intro twice and you should be done... > > Click on the vm vnc console and two times enter/intro I meant > > > > > > All right, I'll try push shutdown button twice. > > But, this is not critical since I can do it by just logging in and > > shutdown from command line. > > > >>> 3) Moving VM from one member host to another in the pool works. > >>> wow!! > >> > >> Meanwhile suspend works this shoud not be a problem... Why don't you > >>> try Xen Cloud?? > > > > Ah, I'll try. It is from historical and political reasons. > > > > Ok this way you can be running the same env... > > > > > By the way, now my /var/log/messages is filled with the following > > logs. > > Could you please give me any pointer/information if you don't mind ? > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Aug 10 10:31:28 xenserver xe_daemon[10567]: /usr/local/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs: cannot open eth0 | 192.168.227.33 > > Aug 10 10:31:28 xenserver xe_daemon[10567]: eth1 | 192.168.227.161: No such file or directory > > Aug 10 10:32:15 xenserver xe_daemon[126]: /usr/local/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs: cannot open eth0 | 192.168.227.33 > > Aug 10 10:32:15 xenserver xe_daemon[126]: eth1 | 192.168.227.161: No such file or directory > > Aug 10 10:32:28 xenserver xe_daemon[10567]: /usr/local/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs: cannot open eth0 | 192.168.227.33 > > Aug 10 10:32:28 xenserver xe_daemon[10567]: eth1 | 192.168.227.161: No such file or directory > > Aug 10 10:33:15 xenserver xe_daemon[126]: /usr/local/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs: cannot open eth0 | 192.168.227.33 > > Aug 10 10:33:15 xenserver xe_daemon[126]: eth1 | 192.168.227.161: No such file or directory > > > > Let me check this please but surely it would be something easy to solve or something that is not complete on the installation.... > > > > > > And also, I also want to make them ports package. > > If you need tester, just let me know. > > > > > > Thank you very much! > > > > > > You're welcome, > Regards! > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > -- > > moto kawasaki 090-2464-8454 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry in this last mails I was talking about making a port with my own scripts and adaptation.... http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_9.0_64-bit_HVM_on_XCP_1.1 I assume I didn't know about you're project at this date... when I answered this mail... From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 16 22:10:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A9C1065673 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop04.sare.net (proxypop04.sare.net [194.30.0.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC698FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.10.3] (unknown [31.4.246.34]) by proxypop04.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 207339DC61E; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:09:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea To: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: References: <50227A96.7050102@deployis.eu> <20120809.094910.243541404.moto@kawasaki3.org> <5DB2CAF9-D293-4220-9B04-73592BAEFCA7@ramattack.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: etxea Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:10:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1345155038.4195.2.camel@mactoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: egoitz@ramattack.net List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 22:10:20 -0000 On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 09:31 -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > No more bash > Less scripts > No need for /procfalse or any temp files for IPs or memory usage > rc script rewritten and conforms to normal FreeBSD standards > > It's on my github -- https://github.com/felderado/freebsd-xen-tools-scripts Sorry in this last mails I was talking about making a port with my own scripts and adaptation.... http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_9.0_64-bit_HVM_on_XCP_1.1 I assume I didn't know about you're project at this date... when I answered this mail... I'm on holiday sorry for answering so late... From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 14:16:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9332C106564A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:16:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop04.sare.net (proxypop04.sare.net [194.30.0.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8A18FC18 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.52.40.156] (unknown [77.209.226.165]) by proxypop04.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADF929DC61D; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:16:09 +0200 (CEST) References: <61BCA99E-2574-4987-ACD9-E84A3AEBD2A3@ramattack.net> <20120810.034203.52110126.moto@kawasaki3.org> <69EAC334-C51A-4F12-98BE-C25674F10A36@ramattack.net> <20120810.103728.219947649.moto@kawasaki3.org> <1345154501.3738.2.camel@mactoo> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <87925EB9-50D0-4D32-A34A-04C763B6525F@ramattack.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:16:17 +0200 To: Mark Felder Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:16:35 -0000 El 17/08/2012, a las 16:07, Mark Felder escribi=C3=B3: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 17:01:41 -0500, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: >=20 >> Sorry in this last mails I was talking about making a port with my own >> scripts and adaptation.... >> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_9.0_64-bit_HVM_on_XCP_1.1 >> I assume I didn't know about you're project at this date... when I >> answered this mail... >=20 > My work is an improvement on yours. Please take a look at it and feel free= contribute additional changes :-) I'm very glad you were able to get this w= orking and post it for everyone to use. I'll take a look Mark :) sure... Was just clarifying that what I have been s= poken about is about the code adapted by me... You know, I'm on holiday and m= ost of times answering from the smartphone... Sometimes you don't read in th= e street and in so a little screen the contents as you should :) Just that.., But sure although I have my code in production and working :) everything is i= mprovable :) :) Bye!! P.S.: FreeBSD rules!!!= From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 20:05:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7D4106564A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arvind.viswanathan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254528FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so2808452lag.13 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=arSfD00uJ+GfjuInGk2v6WwAiYxIiFTN+67nmPlwD48=; b=x5z7kK4PLLnocTcIp2xSMnGZV3KKk+JxSchIQFbXmkZ6ekdAiwFBG6XzBxhb38uVwU JblCT+sY/TMhKUaI0rKEG3xRIKes3AAr2QtRjWcOOsWYOsTDYI2V6bSx9MBpLlFAcNxt 8Mucxd0FhrwRHnrecVta9qF8ATwuM5aQchMU/fUz1dK9jPNGxcFCvmB5MfcvmTjcrdG6 p808eRapCjNQjKHvWYPnYD6XPQhSyi6s36wFVYsnxLckmpJvzugxKZRwT/FUKknbh6oD FBjvaA4ZylM7f/2qMlB/6cTWtj91E58FxkwiPJmZNe0SPeOPRdD9JpEdAmUugBbGkpxX xd3g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.102.234 with SMTP id fr10mr6100234lab.32.1345233912402; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.24.234 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:05:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:05:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: arvind viswanathan To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: xem PVHVM bootdisk related q X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:05:14 -0000 Hi, I find by PVHVM freebsd double faulting and not able to produce a core dump. The last msg I see are xn0: link state changed to DOWN xn0: link state changed to UP xn1: link state changed to DOWN xn1: link state changed to UP Much b4 these msgs I also see, xbd0: 40960MB at device/vbd/768 on xenbusb_front0 xbd0: attaching as ad0 My question is should we change the the fstab entries from ad0 to xbd0 or is it not required? Thanks Arvind From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 23:43:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2758106564A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:43:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arvind.viswanathan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BB88FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lage12 with SMTP id e12so2910879lag.13 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bjrNuHedQoIYoWPXUlmxUXgfPZmygq2dT9SgGWFkjv0=; b=x3w9C2NEw980tXi1XfQSyPtZ0Th8x4cQyM7SJ+f3Ps/ZOBe/1vojDI8Xrf7+KU7qV7 I5j+9zvRkgpoMxlVbjHcnkqNB7h/v7jyJvR4OH95+/Hg/3antwHYUzCQR6qGpF59WoZy TETpwRj7qqpbn9YAV6DDycbrULRzGFp8XT6wIbDD9VXGqaq7YYo2yezu20cUAWsHrJeA efAjs9yzIPQt0B8p5sXl7L8u2D1dwN8b+6gfMpVdAoOLqvSynbOGweMphyeGDm7zwrlL c/iERAc6pmQAxyhC0zDcz9rsxwHYHrnx6Nx9gqb8P5hdIK+Uc4mEGISpj22CesoLOdoO bnig== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.82.66 with SMTP id g2mr3019136lby.15.1345247010763; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.24.234 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:43:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: arvind viswanathan To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Further debugging X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 23:43:32 -0000 Hi, I experience a double fault and I dont see a core dump happening. I checked the params for core file generation seem to be fine. Not sure how to collect further information. Any pointers will be helpful. Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1d WARNING: / was not properly dismounted Fatal double fault rip =3D 0xffffffff804c5128 rsp =3D 0xfffffffeb3cb4ff8 rbp =3D 0xfffffffeb3cb5010 cpuid =3D 0; apic id =3D 00 kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled =FF=FF=FF=FF=D6n=FF=FF=FF=FF) held by 0xffffff0028f0c350 (tid 100022) too l= ong Process name: irq28: xenpci0 Backtrace: kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled With image built using debug kernel, this is where the debugger stopped and backtrace appears as follows: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1d db> ? Bad character ? db> bt Tracing pid 23 tid 100022 td 0xffffff0028f0c350 kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x41 panic() at panic+0x26d _mtx_lock_sleep() at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x181 _mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_flags+0xa1 trap_pfault() at trap_pfault+0xeb trap() at trap+0x2fa calltrap() at calltrap+0x8 --- trap 0xc, rip =3D 0xffffffff806d0f2d, rsp =3D 0xffffffff9457e3c0, rbp = =3D 0xffffffff9457e3d0 --- ffo_disable_com2() at ffo_disable_com2+0xd panic() at panic+0x230 _mtx_lock_sleep() at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x181 _mtx_lock_flags() at _mtx_lock_flags+0xa1 trap_pfault() at trap_pfault+0xeb trap() at trap+0x2fa calltrap() at calltrap+0x8 --- trap 0xc, rip =3D 0xffffffff806d0f2d, rsp =3D 0xffffffff9457e730, rbp = =3D 0xffffffff9457e740 --- ffo_disable_com2() at ffo_disable_com2+0xd panic() at panic+0x230 _mtx_lock_sleep() at _mtx_lock_sleep+0x181 However this doesnt look like a real reson for faulting Thanks Arvind From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 20:02:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7874F106566B for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359058FC08 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:02:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=wwtc6KLu/CaOpkpOnXk7URov+NT2uL/uaivvJKFNJWU=; b=dqS0/M6iVpjMsagQGOzjSjqAKlSqzXOqY9CNM+o3fccunrbIRn4me/LWBCL8eMzGSEQ4uzLqAY+SeIJoe2QaBNJv5uWG524JDgwkrHIFMyxFOeM0skQGplVmAdZFefSy; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T2pDs-000Ehg-7g for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:02:16 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1345320130-41577-41576/5/77; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:02:10 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org References: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:02:09 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5 X-SA-Score: -1.5 Subject: Re: Citrix Xenserver and FreeBSD migration/suspend scripts X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:02:17 -0000 Hi guys, I've done some recent updates: We're down to a resonable amount of scripts now: %%LOCALBASE%%/etc/rc.d/xe-daemon %%LOCALBASE%%/sbin/xe-daemon %%LOCALBASE%%/sbin/xe-update-guest-attrs %%LOCALBASE%%/sbin/xe_wrapper Other changes: - Cleaner memory reporting - IPs for your network interfaces are reported correctly - New version and build to match what the Linux tools report on XenServer 6.0.2 which should make the "out of date" errors go away Feel free to leave some more feedback. I expect this will be joining the xen-tools port very soon now. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 20:06:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3F7106564A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4798FC14 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:06:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:Subject:To:Content-Type; bh=q/Q43fQbf+/NixpcxTes+MXrpjuCNak66DONRujCOuQ=; b=LXIAnPEEat9t3lu7DSzkdL2A+Edg7jXsKl3X545LTCEcbs+FIviMJZNrzZCVR3ADTHD64uoN4td+XmutOvtvukRjOc1YRN4P6JqHtkAgyVfCsyaOHcgKjuQpjG2HioXf; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1T2pHv-000Ehg-9m for freebsd-xen@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:06:27 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1345320386-41577-41576/5/78; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:06:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:06:25 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.01 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Report: ALL_TRUSTED=-1 X-SA-Score: -1.0 Subject: question about xen-tools versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 20:06:28 -0000 Hi guys, Right now sysutils/xen-tools is on version 4.0.1. The latest version available in the 4.0.x branch is 4.0.4 and there's also 4.1.3 available. Is anyone here close enough to the Xen project that they might know what the difference is or if it's safe to run 4.1.3 tools everywhere? If so, I'll get the port updated to 4.1.3. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 22:27:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BBE1065676 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop03.sare.net (proxypop03.sare.net [194.30.0.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1111F8FC0A for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.206.111.64] (unknown [77.209.226.163]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BD7C9DC48D; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:26:32 +0200 (CEST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <8D2435B8-EE54-4313-8734-88443AD7B835@ramattack.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:26:53 +0200 To: Mark Felder Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: question about xen-tools versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:27:06 -0000 El 18/08/2012, a las 22:06, Mark Felder escribi=C3=B3: > Hi guys, >=20 > Right now sysutils/xen-tools is on version 4.0.1. The latest version avail= able in the 4.0.x branch is 4.0.4 and there's also 4.1.3 available. Is anyon= e here close enough to the Xen project that they might know what the differe= nce is or if it's safe to run 4.1.3 tools everywhere? If so, I'll get the po= rt updated to 4.1.3. >=20 >=20 > Thanks! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi,=20 What exactly you need doing?. I explain... Basically Xen-tools are used for w= ritting to Xenstore database through Xenstored at dom0. If you execute a wri= te and a read for the records of a concretely vm and from it (and same test f= rom dom0 for the vm records) and changes are seen from the own vm and from d= om0 with they're Xen-tools nothing should be worring at all. Apart from this= they don't do nothing else... Unless nothing significant I remember now... T= he important part is the kernel related one. So if you administer you're FreeBSD machine as should (update, use it proper= ly and so...) nothing should happen if previous test indicated has succeded.= Remember you can always backup you're actual Xentools with a pkg_create -Rb= nameofxentoolsport before performing the upgrade. Regards,= From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 23:06:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1C6106566B for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop04.sare.net (proxypop04.sare.net [194.30.0.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534988FC08 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:06:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.10.2] (unknown [31.4.246.19]) by proxypop04.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD3A19DC5B2; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 01:06:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Egoitz Aurrekoetxea To: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: <8D2435B8-EE54-4313-8734-88443AD7B835@ramattack.net> References: <8D2435B8-EE54-4313-8734-88443AD7B835@ramattack.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Organization: etxea Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 01:07:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1345331224.2855.7.camel@mactoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: question about xen-tools versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: egoitz@ramattack.net List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:06:37 -0000 On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 00:26 +0200, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote: > El 18/08/2012, a las 22:06, Mark Felder escribió: > > > Hi guys, > > > > Right now sysutils/xen-tools is on version 4.0.1. The latest version available in the 4.0.x branch is 4.0.4 and there's also 4.1.3 available. Is anyone here close enough to the Xen project that they might know what the difference is or if it's safe to run 4.1.3 tools everywhere? If so, I'll get the port updated to 4.1.3. > > > > > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Hi, > > What exactly you need doing?. I explain... Basically Xen-tools are used for writting to Xenstore database through Xenstored at dom0. If you execute a write and a read for the records of a concretely vm and from it (and same test from dom0 for the vm records) and changes are seen from the own vm and from dom0 with they're Xen-tools nothing should be worring at all. Apart from this they don't do nothing else... Unless nothing significant I remember now... The important part is the kernel related one. > > So if you administer you're FreeBSD machine as should (update, use it properly and so...) nothing should happen if previous test indicated has succeded. Remember you can always backup you're actual Xentools with a pkg_create -Rb nameofxentoolsport before performing the upgrade. > > Regards,_______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry Mark, Are you talking about updating the port at cvs?? Well, I assume there shouldn't be any kind of problem as far as mentioned tests succeed.... but perhaps you could ask it at xen community mailing lists too... I thought you were basically talking about upgrading the version of you're port with cvsup... and that newer versions to be available now in cvs for the port... just that... anyway... I think that said tests would be enough for seeing if it works... but (because of talking about upgrading in cvs machines the port version) it should be tested minimally against last Xen 3, actual Xen 4 systems.... Regards,