From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 13 01:23:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956A1CF for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 01:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from superbisquit@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C03B2A0F for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 01:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id gq1so3904700obb.29 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:23:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5dS0eCzm81fI1emC3RRy4FPEafnUYw5MOJhZuZTcoBg=; b=aGcXvKzlhUH6ZG8Rha/6wymaqVwJi1DHMNMTJqTsJO75crXZrxyZq5YGbgj3E0mAzo BMljl5damXyYI5ibl+zPTXSgDBll3wLd9rz3f3tjWuZqrdB4s/TqCCCWzGLMrHdxLijv Sp2E2LXtypEaa8jRwukq03UapyvRLMMKAoIFGHiHuXjJ1j3wz2ti2FM2R/5HLL4MvbtO CQaqfWOdMTxDMJoOAWcGBVDl+c+m6MdO52WQ4ld7NlBKIDbpQnT6QUz/DXlNQJrjZN2i DVCvb7d2ygxTqqFHSyAE0NNWrG5GXOkFh6heg8we1rdEKUldrVQOr0ZC2aWNvz8sp/g+ V3pA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.118.41 with SMTP id kj9mr21137536oeb.31.1381627414642; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:23:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.106.83 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 18:23:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20131012215729.GA2932@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20131010013338.GA10499@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131012032258.GA98799@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131012215729.GA2932@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:23:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: /usr/src/lib/msun errors From: Joe Nosay To: Steve Kargl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 01:23:35 -0000 I am not top posting. Do not accuse me of this. I am upset and depressed and I do not need you to accuse me of something I am not doing. My system is shitting out on me. I have already told you what is happening. Stop accusing me of something I am not doing. On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Steve Kargl < sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > Please, do not top post. It loses context. > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 04:05:27PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Steve Kargl < > > sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:05:56PM -0400, Joe Nosay wrote: > > > > Is the ALPHA base stable enough to do porting of applications? > > > > > > > > > > Huh? What do you mean? People have been running freebsd-current > > > for years and porting applications to FreeBSD. Alpha is simply > > > a point in time for freebsd-current. > > > > I was rebuilding world using an older CURRENT base and the src from > > 10/07/13. The build kept breaking with libiconv, msun, and a few others. > > The problem you had with msun was caused by you adding additional options > to CFLAGS in make.conf without actually understand what those options may > do. > > > This affected both the base and 3rd party. The system is still usable but > > it isn't stable enough for building a 3rd party application. > > Yes, it is stable enough. Remove your custom CFLAG options. > > > If I reinstall the base with CURRENT from 10/07/13 to present, will > > it be stable enough for building 3rd party? > > Of course. But, you need to read src/UPDATING and ports/UPDATING. > > -- > Steve >