From owner-freebsd-security Wed Apr 15 23:09:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA20543 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:09:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from burka.rdy.com (dima@burka.rdy.com [205.149.163.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA20505; Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:08:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@burka.rdy.com) Received: by burka.rdy.com id XAA03735; (8.8.8/RDY) Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199804160608.XAA03735@burka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: kernel permissions In-Reply-To: from Ted Spradley at "Apr 16, 98 00:59:01 am" To: tsprad@set.spradley.tmi.net (Ted Spradley) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 1998 23:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Cc: dima@best.net, louie@TransSys.COM, trost@cloud.rain.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG X-Class: Fast Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@best.net From: dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Ted Spradley writes: > > > Normal users *do not need* to have an read acces to the kernel. > > They simply don't. > > Normal usersdo not need *not* to have read access to the kernel. If it > ain't broke, don't fix it. I've already gave you an example why it shouldn't be like this. > > -- dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message