From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 5 04:17:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3AF16A41A for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+R3=dc7f89aa@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E47413C44B for ; Sat, 5 Jan 2008 04:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+R3=dc7f89aa@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859CC164255 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:51:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311E823E49A for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:51:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 03:51:44 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080105035144.28a1009e@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080104183556.GC19087@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <179863EA8C3D6945412CA598@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <477E6A7B.3070207@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4133784D8828510FCCC00532@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20080104183556.GC19087@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Paging Matthew Seaman X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:17:01 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:35:56 -0500 Jerry McAllister wrote: > I may be missing what you want, but I try CDing to the directory > and then doing the du -hs * eg > cd /tmp > du -hs * > > It seems to get it when naming the directory doesn't. Personally I tend to use "du -hd1" rather than "du -hs *" "*" relies on shell expansion, so ignores top-level hidden directories, and can show a lot of unwanted clutter from top-level files.