From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Jan 6 22:38:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA16955 for emulation-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 22:38:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA16938; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 22:38:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@word.smith.net.au) Received: from word (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA00809; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 17:00:38 +1030 (CST) Message-Id: <199801070630.RAA00809@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: pb@fasterix.freenix.org (Pierre Beyssac) cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: playing with the Linux JDK 1.1.3 under -current In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jan 1998 01:50:53 BST." <19980107015053.TL50316@@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 17:00:37 +1030 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > It all looks like subtle differences in the handling of non-blocking > sockets between Linux and FreeBSD. Does anyone know about any such > differences? I'm looking into this when I can spare a little time, > but I thought maybe it would be a good idea to ask there first :-) I think the correct answer is "please tell us when you have fixes". 8) Seriously, I don't know of anyone else working in this area at the moment. If/when you have anything that works, *please* let me know and I'll get it committed. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\