From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 07:02:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B04C16A4CE; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B606043D6B; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:02:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0KF5UCU021858; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:05:31 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:05:30 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040121.000530.719892310.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: Alexander@Leidinger.net From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <20040119165825.4aa630a8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200401191452.i0JEqDsi040194@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119150116.GC28508@FreeBSD.org> <20040119165825.4aa630a8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: maho@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: eivind@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang Makefile ports/lang/ifc8 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/lang/ifc8/files assert_fail.c cxa_atexit.c cxa_finalize.c errno_location.c exclude exclude_noportdocs ld.c linux_file.c linux_stat.c mcount.S ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 15:02:42 -0000 Hi, Alex, > It's v8 of Intels Fortran Compiler (ifc). v7 is already in the tree. He > follows my leading with icc, but I requested a repo copy of icc to icc7 > whereas he just added the ifc8 port. yes. > I suggest to remove the port and let cvs@ do a repo copy of ifc to ifc7. No. I would like to wait for several months or so, since ifc8 is still inmature state. higaki-san reported several defects of ifc8, and he don't want to recommend to use as a primary fortran compiler. Anyway, ifc8 is not very well tested, and ifc7 is quite tested. so in the meantime, I don't think we need to do repo copy. > The commit message should also have a note about using copies of large > parts of the icc port. I haven't looked at the files yet, but just from You are right. we should acknowledge your hard works. I've done as forced commit. > looking at the commit log there may be something wrong with it, > cxa_finalize.c isn't needed anymore as the entire DSO support is in > cxa_atexit.c now (it has the same line count as the icc one). Committed. thank you very much. Regards, maho