From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 10:41:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BF716A41C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:41:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [217.157.39.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8DA43D49 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:41:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ED67D125468; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:41:10 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: Vsevolod Stakhov , freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050615104110.GA56428@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , Vsevolod Stakhov , freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org References: <200506150810.j5F8AEPA013710@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050615090623.GA27207@alaska.cert.siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050615090623.GA27207@alaska.cert.siemens.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Powered-By: FreeBSD http://www.freebsd.org/ Cc: Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:41:13 -0000 On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Udo Schweigert wrote: > As the maintainer of the mutt ports I vote against it. I don't think it is a reasonable position. There will undoubtedly be a number of people willing to give it a try, and the rest is just politics better to be avoided in the ports tree. > 1. The -ng project was launched because there was a feeling by some people > that the mutt developers don't drive the project with enough power. That was > mainly because the main mutt-developer refuses to include patches into > the source tree he considers unstable. This behavior is IMHO reasonable > and OK as I mainly want a stable mail client. > > 2. I think all features of mutt-ng can be compiled into mutt-devel if you > switch on the right knobs. > > 3. When did you try to use the sidebar support (it has been fixed by the > patch-author recently)? I got feedback by another user who said the new > patch fixed his issues. Did you submit a PR on that? Cheers, \Anton. -- The moronity of the universe is a monotonically increasing function. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi