From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 15 21:03:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DEE16A4CE; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:03:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E500D43D3F; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:03:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472DA137A7; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:03:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 22:04:00 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Loren James Rittle In-Reply-To: <200501131613.j0DGDcnm092474@latour.waar.labs.mot.com> Message-ID: References: <200501081657.j08GvnML053109@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <200501131613.j0DGDcnm092474@latour.waar.labs.mot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: nork@FreeBSD.org cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: Fix -pthread issue on lang/gcc3[34] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:03:57 -0000 On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Loren James Rittle wrote: > David already patched both mainline and 3.4 branch on FSF. > > Thus, I think it is OK to have an equivalent port patch at least > until you start to use an FSF release with the patch. For the FreeBSD ports collection I am using snapshot of the FSF release branches (since these should get increasingly more stable and better and releases do not get specific QA), so whatever is committed to gcc.gnu.org usually ends up in the FreeBSD ports collection within a week. ;-) On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Loren James Rittle wrote: >> I did not realize GCC 3.3 was still being updated. Loren do I have your >> permission to commit the GCC 3.4 fix into the 3.3 branch? I assume this >> branch is open to bug fixes? > You do indeed. Yes, definitely open to per-port bug fixes. Note: It > is unknown to me (at least) whether another release will ever spin off > that branch. GCC 3.3 is still being updated and I believe the release manager is planning to do another (final?) release at some time in spring... Gerald