From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 24 17:49:06 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7720B16A403
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net)
Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.88.12.38])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431A213C474
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net)
Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 6F4D51CC81; Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:26:50 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:26:50 +0100
From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org>
Message-ID: <20061224172650.GM92876@droso.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org>, ports@freebsd.org
References: <200612241053.03751.josh@tcbug.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rPH0Y77Oimr1cvNq"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200612241053.03751.josh@tcbug.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 6.2-PRERELEASE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Submitting a new port with dependancies not in the ports tree
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:49:06 -0000


--rPH0Y77Oimr1cvNq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 10:53:03AM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> I'm in the process of writing a port and it has a dependancy that's=20
> not in the ports tree, so I'm porting that as well.  My question is=20
> what's the procedure in such a case?  Should I submit them both as=20
> part of the same pr?  Obviously the one can't be committed without=20
> the other.
>=20
The easiest way is to submit the dependency first, then wait for the
mail from GNATS and submit the second with a clear notice that the other
PR (#10xxx) needs to be committed first.

Cheers,
-erwin

--=20
Erwin Lansing                                     http://droso.org
Security is like an onion.          (o_ _o)
It's made up of several layers   \\\_\   /_///    erwin@FreeBSD.org
And it makes you cry.            <____) (____>    erwin@aauug.dk

--rPH0Y77Oimr1cvNq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFjrhaefbgcXQUYpwRAujtAJ93jxjxyV06H1fwSRhGmD42U8AZGACeN3fA
SfwyPFWFHm/ZfQ89cIbxnIk=
=nGVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rPH0Y77Oimr1cvNq--