From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 18:07:30 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0C68408 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87625397A for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7PI7UP1099550 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:07:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports utility library Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:07:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: adamw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Approval Needed X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:07:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926 --- Comment #26 from Adam Weinberger --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #25) > > Fabian, if you believe that the COPYING file should go back into > > ${PREFIX}/share/licenses where you originally had it, I am fine with moving > > it there instead. Past that, I agree with you that LICENSE* is ambiguous. > > > > I'll leave the decision up to you, I am happy to move the file to > > share/licenses or leave it as-is and close this PR. > > I'm less ambivalent. I don't really see the download to using LICENSE_FILE. > If it's a matter of principle then just skip the whole thing. Thanks for your opinion, John, but it's Fabian's opinion, as the maintainer, that I'm after. The terms of the LICENSE make skipping the whole thing not an option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.