From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 22 02:03:17 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2D116A402
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:03:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx)
Received: from les.ath.cx (15.61.205.61.west.global.alpha-net.ne.jp
	[61.205.61.15])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E1A13C481
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:03:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx)
Received: by les.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2DBC98661F; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:40:32 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:40:32 +0900
From: YONETANI Tomokazu <qhwt+fbsd@les.ath.cx>
To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20070222014032.GA886@les.ath.cx>
References: <B28E9812BAF6E2498B7EC5C427F293A401F0C7CD@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com>
	<200702211745.15043.jhb@freebsd.org> <45DCEB12.2020107@root.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45DCEB12.2020107@root.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Subject: Getting access to newer ACPI-CA?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 02:03:17 -0000

On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 05:00:02PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Yes, I'm hoping we can do that.  Jung-uk Kim is preparing a patch of
> 20070126 so hopefully we can test and integrate that.

I've been tempted to ask this dumb question for a while -- how do I get
access to 20070126 when the published version is still 20061109? 

  http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/license2.htm

Regards.