From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 25 18:13:28 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78FAD5C3
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:13:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7AC3A4C
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:13:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7PIDSAO094863
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:13:28 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports
 utility library
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:13:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Approval Needed
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-187926-13-vHzMMOsyPu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-187926-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:13:28 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926

--- Comment #27 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #26)
> Thanks for your opinion, John, but it's Fabian's opinion, as the maintainer,
> that I'm after. The terms of the LICENSE make skipping the whole thing not
> an option.

I believe my point before that the fact this is not enforced in ports and thus
we are not held to it is valid.  By your logic we IMMEDIATELY need to fix all
the ports that violate this.  If you say we don't, then it is an option.

Secondly, I am not actually that comfortable letting Fabian make up his own
licensing scheme as a protest against licensing framework.  In other words, I
don't think it's his call.  At this point, I'm almost ready to get portmgr
involved and make a decree.  Big picture -- because a lot of good points have
been brought up here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.