From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Dec 22 11:10: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D07114D7F for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id LAA27748; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:10:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 11:10:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912221910.LAA27748@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: bin/2258: route add/delete Reply-To: Adrian Chadd Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/2258; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Adrian Chadd To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: jin@george.lbl.gov, adrian@freebsd.org, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/2258: route add/delete Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:05:41 +0100 On Tue, Dec 21, 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > Greetings, > > On Sun, 19 Sep 1999 15:12:14 -0700 (PDT), jin@george.lbl.gov wrote: > > > If this field has been changed to netmask in 2.2.x or later, then this > > is the problem. I will look into the code later next week to see if > > this is true. > > Did you find time to look into this? Yup, its actually a netmask field being parsed by route, and the route code in the kernel messes up non-contiguous netmasks. I suggested that we stick a bogon filter in there for this, but garret poked me back saying that non-contiguous netmasks were meant to work.. I haven't looked at it much after that, and I'm on holidays. when I'm back, and its assigned to me, I'll poke at it more. Adrian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message