From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 16:51:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516C016A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 16:51:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D038743D4C; Tue, 31 May 2005 16:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j4VGp0df008467; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:51:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:51:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= In-Reply-To: <86fyw32yqm.fsf@xps.des.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: nectar@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFR] correct type of addrinfo.ai_addrlen and netent.n_net X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:51:17 -0000 On Tue, 31 May 2005, [iso-8859-1] Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > > No, it is not blind bump. The following libraries refers > > getaddrinfo(3), thus should be bumped: > > > > =09=09=09RELENG_5=09HEAD=09Need to Bump > > [...] > > libpam=09=09=092=09=092 > > =09pam_radius=09=09=09=09o > > =09pam_unix=09=09=09=09o > > You can't just bump libpam; you need to bump all the modules along > with it, because libpam will only load modules with the same major > number as itself. In fact, there is only a single SHLIB_MAJOR for the > entire src/lib/libpam tree, in src/lib/libpam/Makefile.inc. > > Is it really necessary to remove the padding? It gives us a lot of > trouble for zero gain. And sometimes we put padding in place to allow for expansion (ucontext for one). I think the padding should stay. If we ever get symbol versioning, then you can remove it without having to bump library versions. --=20 DE