From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Aug 21 23:33:38 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp2.dti.ne.jp (smtp2.dti.ne.jp [210.170.128.122])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7448E14F99
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 23:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from a-wada@mars.dti.ne.jp)
Received: from a.mars.dti.ne.jp (PPP24.tachikawa-ap4.dti.ne.jp [202.216.255.24]) by smtp2.dti.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id PAA20711; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:33:01 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199908220631.AA00053@a.mars.dti.ne.jp>
From: Akira Wada <a-wada@mars.dti.ne.jp>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:31:53 +0900
To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>
Cc: seiwald@perforce.com (Christopher Seiwald),
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: anybody love qsort.c?
References: <199908220056.AA00050@a.mars.dti.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: AL-Mail32 Version 1.10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Following my previous post:
I wrote ..
>I believe a reversed dataset would be partitioned
>into two subpartitions sorted in order at the 1'st pass of 
>the partitionings. Is this incorrect ?
>
Sorry, I'd confirmed BSD qsort's partitioning logic does not
guarantee that "a reversed dataset would be partitioned
into two subpartitions sorted in order at the 1'st pass
of the partitionings".

-Akira Wada


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message