From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 18:31:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D3E424 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B713C3A for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7PIVQWk020775 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:31:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187926] New port: devel/liballium - Tor pluggable transports utility library Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:31:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: adamw@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 18:31:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926 Adam Weinberger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Approval Needed |In Discussion --- Comment #28 from Adam Weinberger --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #27) > (In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #26) > > Thanks for your opinion, John, but it's Fabian's opinion, as the maintainer, > > that I'm after. The terms of the LICENSE make skipping the whole thing not > > an option. > > I believe my point before that the fact this is not enforced in ports and > thus we are not held to it is valid. By your logic we IMMEDIATELY need to > fix all the ports that violate this. If you say we don't, then it is an > option. John, your hyperbolic statements here suggest that you're getting worked up. I would ask that you take a step back and a deep breath and/or a nice sandwich before posting more replies. I'm going to take the sandwich route myself. > Secondly, I am not actually that comfortable letting Fabian make up his own > licensing scheme as a protest against licensing framework. In other words, > I don't think it's his call. At this point, I'm almost ready to get portmgr > involved and make a decree. Big picture -- because a lot of good points > have been brought up here. John, do whatever makes you happy. I stand behind the decision to install a copy of the license, as specified by the terms of the license. Using the combination of LICENSE, LICENSE_FILE, LICENSE_NAME, and LICENSE_PERMS is not mandatory, but honouring the terms of the license is. Fabian, I and the port are not inventing a licensing scheme. We are installing a copy of the license. I ask that you re-read this, because this whole thing is coming down to you objecting to installing a copy of the license. If you would like to involve portmgr then please, by all means seek their input. For now I am going to let the port continue to install its COPYING file, and I am leaving it with the port's maintainer to choose the location he prefers to see it installed in. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.