From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 20 05:31:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C37516A4CF; Fri, 20 May 2005 05:31:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk (pasmtp.tele.dk [193.162.159.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A5E43D90; Fri, 20 May 2005 05:31:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (0x535c0e2a.sgnxx1.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [83.92.14.42]) by pasmtp.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739361EC30F; Fri, 20 May 2005 07:31:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4K5UuPi024293; Fri, 20 May 2005 07:30:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: "Daniel O'Connor" From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 May 2005 10:01:42 +0930." <200505201001.50476.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 07:30:56 +0200 Message-ID: <24292.1116567056@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: why omshell when no dhcpd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 05:31:11 -0000 In message <200505201001.50476.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, "Daniel O'Connor" writes : >> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> : Why do we have the omshell program in the base system when dhcpd is not >> : there ? >> >> Because you can use it with dhclient. > >Although you need a degree in brain engineering to acttually figure out how > >8-) I usually just look in cat /var/db/dhclient.leases -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.