From owner-freebsd-proliant@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 4 18:40:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B6A10656C2 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan.slavkov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com (mail-fx0-f158.google.com [209.85.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92618FC15 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivan.slavkov@gmail.com) Received: by fxm2 with SMTP id 2so2946062fxm.43 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:39:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nq6pi4LXQnpdZcpxzQ9Xz1WduKwtdRLafB6R86qpsxw=; b=JQWDZiIIQE3oeoOSyPUCKyFQpJEDhA5IXtcZDfHwUBoZjCRZBjjkfDlG2AlewpVgAF 6cwdJEgxJzkMm45KqtaRMPZNVgXEO9+OLItNyEAY4GxvqdkW2mlqTSc9/eM/dNL4Sp6l rZRccRwtw/vl5KdxLHZcqriaKLb4F+Vbn/d00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=LY5UbW8DMmfYiMS68Wy2a5vi3EQcdVfoNJAze5oyEF3Sm0WYmm4xHa3iRHe36egUHd orUw8VnEN12QXjhw8awqwR1bZ160oWmgza/o/6oAuBxTnCfSC/gJ42LuEe6ojdKd5P/6 05XPSX+MazBs0LOFKG83T3nNUrwLNUxLe8pjE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.126.10 with SMTP id a10mr176895fas.17.1236191998949; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:39:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com> References: <60bb96a10903040729t6f5603bl865b7047960830e7@mail.gmail.com> <6863f0c90903041033mbbeacdt188752e9550b8f51@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:39:58 +0200 Message-ID: <60bb96a10903041039l6c8aa0ag72abd676124e127a@mail.gmail.com> From: Ivan Slavkov To: John Cagle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dual cpu question X-BeenThere: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion of FreeBSD on HP ProLiant server platforms." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:40:02 -0000 I haven't tried this yet. I will try. The main Idea is to have system with two good-working on FreeBSD. On this stage I cannot have it :( On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:33 PM, John Cagle wrote: > Why don't you rebuild the kernel without SMP support? Then it will only > use one CPU. > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Ivan Slavkov wrote: > >> Hello all! >> Is there any software way to stop the second processor of two-processor >> (two >> quad core Xeon) proliant server with FreeBSD without romoving the >> proceesor >> in real? I have dead-locks with the two processors even in 7.1 with the >> new >> ULE schessuler. If I use one processor there are no problems. >> >> - Ivan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >