From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 09:17:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E5837B401; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B2043F93; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h6HGH0kN002399; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.3/Submit) id h6HGH0GS002398; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:17:00 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030717091700.B2145@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20030717080805.GA98878@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030717033620.B51802@xorpc.icir.org> <200307170906.51902.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030717160942.GB46923@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030717160942.GB46923@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:09:42AM -0700 Subject: Re: Things to remove from /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:17:01 -0000 On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:09:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: ... > > I think this is an excellent point. David, can you provide actual numbers > > of how much removing each of these programs saves? > > Then hell, lets just totally duplicate all of /[s]bin into /rescue. > Remember this is BSD, this is Unix. This isn't every other gargantuan > OS. Before you call me facious, seriously ask yourself what is the > purpose of /rescue. whatever it is, certainly the purpose is not to show how good a sysadmin is in using a knife's blade as a screwdriver and a fork and a spoon. Heck, even swiss army knives have these extra tools. I think that if something in /rescue can make the task faster and less error prone, removing it to save 10-50k of disk space would be a big mistake. cheers luigi