From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 10 07:18:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A61C954 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:18:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBE318E2 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A089A14D250A; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:18:49 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at !change-mydomain-variable!.example.com Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id FF5wbuUcpnp1; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:18:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (54034B4D.catv.pool.telekom.hu [84.3.75.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3DDE14D2462; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:18:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51DD0AD8.60102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:18:48 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/22.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler , Alberto Mijares Subject: Re: RFC: Upgrading to DocBook 5.0 References: <519FA4FE.4030305@FreeBSD.org> <51D3E051.5070506@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:18:51 -0000 Em 10-07-2013 00:10, Eitan Adler escreveu: > top posting, really? > > >> >On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Gabor Kovesdan >>> >>One more thing to discuss: shall we maintain the sect1, sect2, ... elements >>> >>or just use section? > How would this be rendered in HTML? Does this change anything? As already mentioned: no. Not reading history, really? ;) Gabor