From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr 15  7:53:28 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D0C37B81D
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 07:53:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com)
Received: from r84aap011262.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.194.25] helo=rcn.com)
	by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3)
	id 12gTwu-00057D-00
	for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:53:28 -0400
Message-ID: <38F88263.46D9076D@rcn.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 10:53:23 -0400
From: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: problem installing TKhylafax
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hello:
	I just tried to install tkhylafax-3.0b2 and got:

huff@r84aap011262> make
===>  Extracting for tkhylafax-3.0b2
>> Checksum OK for tkhylafax-3.0b2.tar.gz.
===>  Patching for tkhylafax-3.0b2
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for tkhylafax-3.0b2
===>  Configuring for tkhylafax-3.0b2
===>  Building for tkhylafax-3.0b2
huff@r84aap011262> make install
===>  Installing for tkhylafax-3.0b2
===>   tkhylafax-3.0b2 depends on executable: wish8.2 - found
===>   tkhylafax-3.0b2 depends on executable: sendfax - not found
===>    Verifying install for sendfax in /usr/ports/comms/hylafax
===>  hylafax-4.0.2 is forbidden: Security hole (buffer overflow
yielding setuid uucp).
===>   Returning to build of tkhylafax-3.0b2

	So, if one can't install one of the required componenets, shouldn't
tkhylafax be marked as broken?


				Robert Huff


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message