From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 17:10:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2642E16A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from otter3.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1576F43FCB for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:10:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from centtech.com ([192.168.42.24]) by otter3.centtech.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hAJ19s6T034854; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:09:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <3FBAC2DB.1080004@centtech.com> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:09:47 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harald Schmalzbauer References: <20031116120622.O57495@root.org> <200311180346.22259@harrymail> <20031118095752.R64353@root.org> <200311182346.13704@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <200311182346.13704@harrymail> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: acpi_cpu_idle panic (Was: Re: kernel panic with todays source) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 01:10:02 -0000 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >On Tuesday 18 November 2003 18:58, you wrote: > > >>On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: >> >> >>>On Tuesday 18 November 2003 03:37, you wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Sorry I wasn't more clear. I need you to print the contents like this: >>>> print *cpu_cx_count >>>> >>>> >>>cpu_cx_count 1 >>>cpu_cx_lowest 0 >>>cpu_idle_hook c0468300 >>>cpu_cx_next 0 >>> >>>I hope these are the correct values. >>> >>> >>Thanks, those are the correct values for your box. I just posted a patch >>that should address the boot-time panic. Please revert old patches and >>try it. >> >> > >Yep, this looks good. Perhaps you're interested in the following line which >arose for the first time during boot: > >C0? cx_next 0 cx_count 1 > >And here is what you requested in your first patch: > >cale:~> sysctl hw.acpi.cpu >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0 >hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 0/0 > > Ok - what do I need to do to try this new acpi stuff out? I'm running -current as of Nov 14th, and I'd like to help debug/test this on my notebook.. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology All generalizations are false, including this one. ------------------------------------------------------------------