From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 3 08:14:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A679DC for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93294A99 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 08:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (50-196-156-133-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.156.133]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA38ED22021894 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Nov 2014 00:14:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <5457394E.4050905@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:14:06 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tiwei Bie , Mateusz Guzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] Finish the task 'sysctl reporting current working directory' References: <1414987325-23280-1-git-send-email-btw@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20141103051908.GC29497@dft-labs.eu> <20141103064052.GA1739@freebsd> In-Reply-To: <20141103064052.GA1739@freebsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 08:14:26 -0000 On 11/3/14, 2:40 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 06:19:08AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:02:05PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: >> >>> @@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ TAILQ_HEAD(sysctl_ctx_list, sysctl_ctx_entry); >>> #define KERN_PROC_UMASK 39 /* process umask */ >>> #define KERN_PROC_OSREL 40 /* osreldate for process binary */ >>> #define KERN_PROC_SIGTRAMP 41 /* signal trampoline location */ >>> +#define KERN_PROC_CWD 42 /* process current working directory */ >>> >>> why are you using a fixed sysctl MIB number? I thought we were moving towards dynamic sysctls when we add new ones.